ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Aging and Public Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1453244
This article is part of the Research TopicComprehensive Strategies for Public Health Education across Diverse Audiences and Settings to Control Nosocomial InfectionView all 7 articles
"Caregiver Insights on Challenges and Needs in Fecal Incontinence Products: A Mixed Methods Study" Authors names
Provisionally accepted- department of nursing, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Aims: This study explores the real-world use and challenges of fecal incontinence (FI) collection products-both absorbent items (pads, diapers) and dedicated fecal-collection devices with adhesive fixators-among long-term, bed-bound hospital patients, while also considering broader public-health implications. It seeks to identify barriers to optimal product use and to offer recommendations for improving incontinence management outcomes.Background: Effective FI management is essential to patient well-being and to preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Although multiple FI collection products are available, their use in long-term hospital settings remains suboptimal, largely because of caregiver training gaps and limited resources.This mixed-methods study used an explanatory sequential design. Quantitative data were gathered through online and paper-based surveys administered to caregivers in three hospitals (n = 318). These data were supplemented by qualitative interviews (n = 24) that provided deeper insight into the challenges identified. We performed descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, including logistic regression, and carried out a thematic analysis of interview transcripts to clarify the factors influencing product choice and the related public-health implications.Results: Product choice was shaped by distinct factors across caregiver groups. For family caregivers, household income (OR = 2.380) and living arrangement (OR = 0.344) were major determinants. Among nursing assistants, prior training (OR = 8.817) strongly affected selection. For nurses, incontinence-associated dermatitis training (OR = 3.344) and work environment (OR = 3.304) were critical. Qualitative interviews highlighted mismatches between available products and actual needs, emphasizing the importance of reforming procurement channels, raising awareness, and tailoring caregiver education.Conclusions: Disparities in FI product use stem mainly from economic constraints, training gaps, and limited awareness. Enhancing caregiver training, streamlining product distribution, and broadening insurance support could strengthen FI management and reduce HAIs. Although the findings offer useful guidance for policy and practice, their generalizability is limited by the single geographic setting and reliance on self-reported data. Future studies should examine diverse institutional contexts to validate and extend these results.
Keywords: Fecal Incontinence, bedridden persons, Caregivers, medical devices, Health Policy
Received: 22 Jun 2024; Accepted: 09 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yu, Hao, Li, Hu, Xiong, Chen and Cai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Wenzhi Cai, department of nursing, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.