SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1575801
This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Information for Patient Education, Volume IIView all 7 articles
Tools/Instruments for Assessing YouTube Videos on Surgical Procedures for Patient/Consumer Health Education: A Systematic Review
Provisionally accepted
- Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
YouTube is becoming an increasingly popular platform for health education; however, its reliability for surgical patient education remains largely unexplored. Given the global prevalence of preoperative anxiety, it becomes essential to ensure accurate information online.The objective is to assess tools/instruments used to evaluate YouTube videos on surgical procedures created to educate patients or health consumers. Methods: In June 2023, a comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus. Primary studies with empirical data that evaluate English YouTube videos to educate patients about surgical procedures in all specialties were included. Two reviewers independently completed title/abstract and full text screening, and data extraction in duplicate. The data extracted includes the number of videos evaluated, assessment tools, outcomes of significance, specific objectives, and features examined. Results: A total of 41 studies were included in the review. The most commonly used evaluation tools were DISCERN (21 studies), the Global Quality Scale (11 studies), and the JAMA benchmark criteria (11 studies). Notably, 23 studies used a unique assessment instrument, and several studies employed more than one tool concurrently. Of the total studies included, 88% of the articles determined that patients were not adequately educated by YouTube videos per the ratings of the assessment tools, and 19 out of 41 articles mentioned that videos from professional sources were most useful. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that the educational qualities in YouTube videos are substandard. Patients should be cautious when relying solely on YouTube videos for medical guidance. Surgeons and medical institutions are encouraged to direct patients to high-quality patient education sources and create accessible medical content. As there is variability in the quality assessment tools used for evaluation, a standardized approach to creating and assessing online medical videos would improve patient education.
Keywords: Patient Education, Surgical procedure, Social Media, YouTube videos, quality assessment, psychometrics, Health Education
Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pavuloori, Lin and Mi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Manasa Pavuloori, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.