ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1598482

This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Information for Patient Education, Volume IIView all 5 articles

Knowledge domain and emerging trends in medication literacy research from 2003 to 2024: A scientometric and bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace and VOSviewer

Provisionally accepted
Penghong  DengPenghong Deng1Xiaoxia  LiuXiaoxia Liu2Caiyun  LiCaiyun Li3,4Xingping  ZhuXingping Zhu5Junli  CuiJunli Cui5Ping  HuaPing Hua5*Gang  ChenGang Chen5*
  • 1Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 2Department of Infectious Diseases, The Affiliated Dongtai Hospital of Nantong University, Dongtai, China
  • 3Department of Pharmacy, Suzhou Hospital of Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Suzhou, China
  • 4Department of Pharmacy, Suzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China
  • 5Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Dongtai Hospital of Nantong University, Dongtai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Medication literacy (ML) has emerged as a critical global public health concern, garnering growing scholarly attention over the past two decades. To delineate major research domains, identify evolving trends, and inform future research priorities, we conducted a scientometric analysis of the scientific literature on ML.: A systematic search was performed to retrieve publications on ML from the Web of Science Core Collection, covering the period from 2003 to 2024. Scientometric analyses were executed using CiteSpace and VOSviewer to visualize and evaluate collaborative networks, including co-citation references, co-occurring keywords, and contributions by countries, institutions, authors, and journals. Results: The analysis incorporated 1,968 eligible publications. A rapidly growing trend in research interest in ML was observed, with an average annual growth rate of 46.1% in publications between 2003 and 2022. Three major research trends were identified: relationship between ML and medication adherence, the development of ML-specific assessment tools, and investigation of psychosocial factors associated with ML. The United States of America, Northwestern University, Davis Tc, and Patient Education and Counseling were identified as the most cited and influential entities within this field, representing the leading country, institution, author, and journal, respectively. Conclusions: Scientometric analysis provides invaluable insights to clinicians and researchers involved in ML research by identifying leading contributors, intellectual bases and research trends. ML is evolving from unidimensional analysis to multidisciplinary exploration of dynamic mechanisms. Future research on ML is facing significant challenges, including the exploration of adherence mechanisms, validation of digital assessment tools, and the moderating effect model of socio-psychological factors on ML.

Keywords: Medication literacy, Scientometric, Bibliometric, Citespace, VOSviewer

Received: 23 Mar 2025; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Deng, Liu, Li, Zhu, Cui, Hua and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Ping Hua, Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Dongtai Hospital of Nantong University, Dongtai, China
Gang Chen, Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Dongtai Hospital of Nantong University, Dongtai, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.