BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health and Nutrition
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613200
This article is part of the Research TopicUltra-Processed Foods: Impacts on Diet Quality, Health, Consumer Behavior, and Food SystemsView all 6 articles
Nutritional quality of foods according to the Nova food classification system after a behavioral economics intervention in food pantries
Provisionally accepted
- University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Consumption of ultra-processed foods has been linked with poor health outcomes.Using the Nova food classification system to measure the level of food processing, this study assessed whether foods selected by food pantry clients were more favorable following a behavioral economics food pantry intervention.The study analyzed secondary data from a group-randomized evaluation in 11 Minnesota food pantries. Food items selected by 187 clients (85 intervention, 102 control) were categorized according to Nova in one of four categories: (1) unprocessed/minimally processed,(2) culinary ingredients, (3) processed foods, or (4) ultra-processed foods. In each client cart, the energy share (% of total calories) of each Nova food category was calculated. Adjusted mixed linear models were used to test the post-intervention differences in the energy share of Nova food categories between intervention conditions. Results: On average, unprocessed/minimally processed foods represented 34.6% of the energy share among carts in the intervention group and 33.8% among client carts in the control group.Ultra-processed foods represented 43.5% and 41.1% of the foods in the control and intervention groups, respectively. In the adjusted models, no statistically significant differences in the energy share of Nova categories were found between foods selected by clients in the pantries in the two conditions.Discussion: Neither a reduction in client selection of ultra-processed foods nor an increase in unprocessed/minimally processed foods were among the benefits of the intervention. Future research should explore interventions targeting Nova food categories and subgroups to improve the nutritional quality of foods in food pantries.
Keywords: Ultra-Processed foods, NOVA classification system, nutritional quality, Behavioral Economics, Food pantry, consumer behavior
Received: 16 Apr 2025; Accepted: 08 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rossi, Gombi Vaca, Schwartz and Caspi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Maria Gombi Vaca, University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.