ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Children and Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1614089
This article is part of the Research TopicRisk and Protective Factors, Family Environment and (A)Typical Neurodevelopmental Outcomes - Volume IIView all 7 articles
Family outcomes of a parent-implemented early intervention for neurodevelopmental disorders: An exploratory study of family dynamics
Provisionally accepted- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Neurodevelopmental disorders have become global public health challenges, and early interventions are proved to be effective in mitigating the problems and promoting the longterm functioning of people facing such challenges. These interventions had long been provided only by health professionals, but parents are now recognized for their capabilities. Parent-implemented early interventions are devised to equip parents with specialized knowledge and skills so that they can offer tailored training for their children. As these community-based interventions are designed to be implemented at home, they inevitably influence and are influenced by the family systems. While the family dynamics play a key role in determining the efficacy of the intervention, still little is known about the familial factors as the focus on the existing literature is on the changes of the parent-child dyads. This research bridged this knowledge gap in implementation sciences by investigating how the family members who did not partake in the training reacted to the parent-implemented interventions at home.A qualitative study was conducted between August 2023 to July 2024 in Hong Kong examining the impacts of a localized version of the World Health Organization Caregiver Skills Training. Twenty-two respondents participated in five focus groups. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis was applied to construct codes, themes and frameworks.Four levels of responses-Level 0: Reject, Level 1: Support, Level 2: Attempt, and Level 3: Embrace-were identified, and these themes were on a continuum of families' involvement in the practice of PII. Factors that promoted or discouraged their involvement were discussed. Evidence has confirmed that PII had indirect impacts on family dynamics, and the responses of family members affected the intervention effectiveness and the mental health of the caregiver-participants.This research responded to the call to improve public health evaluations. It moved beyond the linear changing processes in the intervention design, addressed the complexity of the social systems, and explicated the multidimensional changing processes in a family-the immediate context where parent-implemented early intervention was implemented. This research contributed to build initial frameworks on the familial influences and support the future development of the intervention and research designs.
Keywords: neurodiversity, neurodevelopemntal disorders, parent-implemented early intervention program, autism spectral disorder (ASD), Caregiver training, Family dynamics, Program Evaluation, Impact assessment (IA)
Received: 18 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wong, Chan and Wong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Paul W.C. Wong, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.