Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1649948

This article is part of the Research TopicCommunity Engagement: Models and EffectivenessView all 17 articles

The effect of youths as change agents on self-rated health status and happiness among adult neighbors: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Sri Lanka

Provisionally accepted
Zobida  IslamZobida Islam1*Tetsuya  MizoueTetsuya Mizoue2Nadeeka  ChandraratneNadeeka Chandraratne3Susantha  IndrawansaSusantha Indrawansa3Nalika  GunawardenaNalika Gunawardena4
  • 1Kokuritsu Kenko Kiki Kanri Kenkyu Kiko, 739298, Shinjuku, Japan
  • 2Kokuritsu Kansensho Kenkyujo, Shinjuku, Japan
  • 3University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
  • 4World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Lifestyle modification intervention may influence the mental health of the participants. The present study examined the effect of youth-led interventions on self-rated health (SRH) and happiness of community adults in Sri Lanka. Methods: This cluster-randomized controlled trial study was conducted in a semi-urban area of Colombo in Sri Lanka. Out of 68 Gramma Niladari (GN) divisions in the selected Divisional Secretariat, 24 GN (intervention=12 and control=12) were randomly selected.The intervention group received health education from their community's young adults (aged 15 to 29 years) to identify and modify the determinants of their undesired health behaviors twice a month. The control group did not receive any intervention. In baseline and 12 th -month follow-up surveys, participants were asked to rate their SRH and happiness using a single-question measure. Multilevel logistic regressions and multilevel linear regressions were used to assess the effects of the intervention on changes in binary and continuous SRH and happiness, respectively, from baseline to end line.Results: At the 12 th -month follow-up, 483 adults aged 27 to 65 years (intervention = 245; control = 238) completed the final assessments out of the 512 participants enrolled at baseline. Participants in the intervention group showed higher odds of achieving good SRH [odds ratio (OR) 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-2.90] compared to those in the control group. They showed a significantly greater change in SRH than controls; the mean difference in SRH change between the two groups was 0.13 (95% CI, 0.002-0.26).There was no significant difference in happiness between the two groups; the OR (95% CI) in the intervention group was 1.37 (0.85-2.22).The results suggest that a youth-led educational program promoting healthier behaviors among their neighbors can effectively improve the SRH of community adults in a semi-urban area of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Trial registration: Trial registration number: SLCTR/2017/002, Name of registry: Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry, Date of registration: 19th January 2017, Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 1st February 2017.

Keywords: Self-reported health, happiness, youth-led intervention, Randomized controlled, Sri Lanka

Received: 19 Jun 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Islam, Mizoue, Chandraratne, Indrawansa and Gunawardena. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zobida Islam, Kokuritsu Kenko Kiki Kanri Kenkyu Kiko, 739298, Shinjuku, Japan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.