ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1651646
How ecological, production, and living spaces jointly shape urban spatial integration through resource sharing and interaction
Provisionally accepted- Faculty of Finance and Economics, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong, Guangdong, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study focuses on the synergistic integration mechanism of urban Production, Living, and Ecological (P-L-E) spaces, employing a structural equation model (SEM) to elucidate their interaction pathways and the moderating effects of policy implementation and public awareness. Based on 750 survey responses from Guangdong Province, the findings indicate that Perceived Quality of Ecological Space (PQES) exerts the strongest influence on the Degree of Urban Spatial Integration (DUSI) (β = 0.236), followed by Production Space Vitality (PSV) and Satisfaction with Living Space (SLS). The key mediating variables-Degree of Shared Access to Spatial Resources (DSSR) and Frequency of Spatial Interaction (FSI)-serve as critical bridges linking the three spatial dimensions to DUSI, with the indirect effect of PQES via FSI being the most pronounced (β = 0.051). Moreover, the Effectiveness of Urban Planning Policy Implementation (EPPI) amplifies the positive impacts of SLS on both resource sharing and interaction frequency, while Public Environmental Awareness (PEA) strengthens the promotive role of ecological space perception in achieving spatial integration. The model explains 43.9% of the variance, unveiling a systematic pathway of "spatial quality enhancement → resource sharing → behavioral interaction → integration achievement." These findings provide a robust theoretical basis for optimizing the quality of urban production, living, and ecological spaces, as well as for refining policy implementation frameworks. The study underscores the necessity of advancing spatial optimization in tandem with public engagement to build efficient, livable, and sustainable urban spatial systems.
Keywords: Urban Spatial Integration, Structural Equation Modeling, mediation effect, Policy implementation, environmental awareness
Received: 22 Jun 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Liu, Zeng and Yan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yanqing Yan, Faculty of Finance and Economics, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong, Guangdong, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.