- 1Shanghai Baoshan Center of Disease Prevention and Control, Baoshan, China
- 2College of Arts and Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
- 3College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- 4College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China
Interventions targeting chronic diseases through urban built environments have gained increasing attention due to their potential population-level health benefits. However, empirical evidence on the relationship between built environment features and cardiovascular health among older adults remains limited, particularly in ultradense Asian cities experiencing rapid population aging. This study analyzed fine-scale built environment data to delineate 15-min walkable neighborhoods around 2,579 stroke emergency visits among adults aged 60 to 80 in Shanghai. Participants were classified as survivors or non-survivors based on outcomes during their initial hospitalization, serving as a proxy for cardiovascular health status. Using binary logistic regression, we examined associations between neighborhood environmental characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes. Results indicated that higher residential building density and proximity to major roads were significantly linked to poorer cardiovascular health, whereas greater neighborhood greenness, measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), was associated with better outcomes, especially within socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Streetscape features such as visible sky and greenery were positively correlated with better cardiovascular health in more affluent areas. Additionally, a U-shaped relationship emerged between the proportion of residential land use and cardiovascular outcomes in disadvantaged communities. These findings provide nuanced, context-specific insights into how fine-scale built environment factors relate to cardiovascular health among aging urban populations, offering valuable implications for land use planning and healthy urban design.
1 Introduction
According to the World Health Organization, the global population aged 60 and above is projected to reach 1.4 billion by 2030, underscoring the urgent need to prioritize healthy aging as a critical public health challenge (1, 2). In China, this demographic transition is occurring at an accelerated pace, with older adults disproportionately affected by chronic diseases due to age-related physiological decline and relatively lower socioeconomic status (3). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), particularly stroke, represent a major health threat for older populations and have become the leading cause of death worldwide (4, 5), placing substantial burdens on healthcare systems and broader societal resources (6).
While pharmacological interventions remain the primary approach for mitigating cardiovascular risk, increasing attention has turned toward the built environment (BE) as a modifiable, non-clinical determinant of health capable of generating sustained population-level benefits through structural and behavioral pathways (7, 8). The BE encompasses human-made physical surroundings that support daily living, including land-use patterns, street connectivity, public infrastructure, and access to green spaces. A widely recognized framework for evaluating BE is the “5D” model, comprising five interrelated dimensions: density, diversity, design, destination accessibility, and distance to transit (8). These dimensions collectively shape individuals’ physical activity, travel behavior, and lifestyle choices, thereby influencing cardiovascular health outcomes (9).
Given the growing recognition of the BE as a key health determinant, it is essential to examine how specific population subgroups interact with their environments. Older adults represent a particularly vulnerable demographic whose health outcomes are highly sensitive to the quality and accessibility of their immediate surroundings. With advancing age, individuals often experience reduced mobility, declining physical capacity, and heightened sensitivity to environmental constraints. Consequently, their spatial behavior becomes more localized, and they increasingly rely on the availability and quality of nearby services, infrastructure, and amenities (10). In this context, the neighborhood environment emerges as a critical setting for promoting physical activity, social participation, and the prevention of chronic diseases such as CVD.
In response to these challenges, urban researchers and planners have increasingly developed actionable planning models that translate theoretical knowledge of the BE into practical, health-supportive interventions, particularly tailored to aging populations. Neighborhood-based spatial planning models emphasizing proximity, accessibility, and walkability have attracted substantial attention. These models operationalize the abstract dimensions of the 5D framework into tangible urban forms that shape residents’ daily experiences, especially for individuals with reduced mobility. This discourse has culminated in the emergence of the “15-min walkable neighborhood” concept—a promising planning paradigm integrating health, equity, and accessibility. Endorsed by urban policies worldwide, the 15-min walkable neighborhood aims to ensure essential services such as healthcare, public transport, recreational facilities, and daily amenities are accessible within a 15-min walk (11–14). By supporting active travel and facilitating routine engagement with one’s environment, this model promotes physical activity, social interaction, and beneficial environmental exposures, which are especially vital for older adults’ health and well-being (15). As such, the 15-min neighborhood holds considerable potential to mitigate spatial isolation, reduce health disparities, and improve cardiovascular outcomes among urban aging populations (16).
Recently, the 15-min neighborhood framework has gained traction in Chinese cities as part of broader strategies to advance public health and sustainable urban development (15). Against this backdrop, the present study investigates associations between fine-grained BE characteristics and cardiovascular health among older adults residing within 15-min walkable neighborhoods in urban China (17, 18). Leveraging high-resolution spatial data, we examine the neighborhood environments of 2,579 Shanghai residents aged 60 to 80. Situated within a densely populated Asian megacity, this study provides novel empirical evidence on spatial mechanisms linking neighborhood-level BE features to health outcomes in later life. Moreover, by incorporating an equity perspective, it explores how these associations vary across neighborhoods with differing socioeconomic profiles, thereby informing both theoretical development and practical strategies for inclusive, health-oriented urban planning.
2 Literature review
Existing studies have investigated the complex relationships between various domains of neighborhood built environment characteristics and cardiovascular health, including land use, open spaces, transportation infrastructure, service facilities, and streetscape features (see Table 1). The built environment influences cardiovascular health primarily through two key pathways (19). The first involves prolonged exposure to environmental stressors such as air pollution and traffic noise, which can disrupt physiological processes by elevating blood pressure and altering lipid and glucose metabolism, thereby increasing cardiovascular risk (20–22). For example, urban roads are major sources of air and noise pollution closely linked to elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (23). The second pathway operates through behavioral and social mechanisms. Access to green spaces supports cardiovascular health by promoting physical activity and facilitating social interactions (24, 25). Moreover, higher land-use mix and greater road connectivity within neighborhoods can reduce travel distances, encourage walking or cycling, and foster more active lifestyles, ultimately contributing to improved cardiovascular health outcomes (26, 27). Collectively, these findings highlight the crucial role of neighborhood built environments in shaping health-related behaviors and mitigating harmful exposures, underscoring their potential as effective targets for public health interventions in urban settings. These mechanisms are central to emerging urban planning concepts such as the 15-min walkable neighborhood, which aim to align everyday accessibility with health-supportive environments.
Table 1. Existing findings about the association between the built environment and cardiovascular health.
Despite increasing research interest, critical gaps remain in our understanding of the built environment–cardiovascular health nexus. First, empirical findings have been inconsistent (see Table 1). For instance, some studies report a negative association between population density and cardiovascular mortality (28, 29), while others observe an inverted U-shaped relationship or no significant effects (6, 30).
Similar inconsistencies arise concerning land-use mixture and road density (30, 31). These discrepancies may stem from imprecise neighborhood definitions and reliance on coarse spatial measurements, limiting deeper insights into the complex interplay between built environment attributes and health outcomes (28, 32). Second, several potentially important built environment factors remain underexplored, particularly street-level characteristics within walkable areas for older adults (see Table 1). Urban streets, as essential settings for daily activities such as walking and cycling, may directly or indirectly influence residents’ behaviors and health outcomes (33, 34). Positive street elements, such as blue skies, tree shade, and wide, well-maintained sidewalks, can enhance perceived comfort and safety, thereby encouraging outdoor physical activity and supporting cardiovascular health (34, 35).
Although some research acknowledges the role of green visibility, the health implications of other street-level features remain unclear. Third, structural barriers prevalent in many metropolitan areas—such as spatial mismatch, social inequality, and insufficient age-friendly planning—continue to hinder equitable access to health-supportive environments (36–39). These challenges disproportionately affect older adults, who are more vulnerable due to age-related functional decline and a higher dependency on proximate services. Older individuals living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods often face limited access to essential amenities such as healthcare, recreational spaces, and commercial facilities, which restricts opportunities for health-promoting behaviors and exacerbates disparities in cardiovascular outcomes (40–43).
To address these challenges, the present study focuses on older adults residing in large urban areas and examines the relationship between detailed built environment characteristics and cardiovascular health within the framework of 15-min walkable neighborhoods. By concentrating on this high-risk population, the study aims to provide empirical evidence to inform inclusive, health-oriented urban planning strategies that promote active aging and reduce spatial health inequalities.
3 Materials and methods
3.1 Research framework
As previously noted, the pathways through which the built environment influences cardiovascular health can be broadly categorized into exposure-related and behavior-related mechanisms. Exposure-related pathways involve contact with harmful environmental factors such as air pollution and noise, while behavior-related pathways encompass lifestyle factors including diet, physical activity, and social interaction. To conceptualize these mechanisms, we developed a comprehensive analytical framework focusing on the built environment at the scale of a 15-min walkable neighborhood. This framework incorporates five key dimensions: land use, transportation, open space, service facilities, and streetscape features (see Figure 1). We hypothesize that variables within each dimension impact cardiovascular health through these dual pathways.
3.2 Study area and data resource
Shanghai is recognized as a leading global center for economic, financial, trade, shipping, and technological innovation in China. In 2021, the city’s gross domestic product (GDP) reached 4.32 trillion yuan, ranking first among all Chinese cities. This study selects Baoshan District as the empirical research area. Although Baoshan is a suburban district of Shanghai, its population size (about 2.1 million) is comparable to that of many medium-sized cities. In 2019, its population density (3,437 persons/km2) was roughly twice that of Portland (1,684 persons/km2) (44). Meanwhile, the district is experiencing pronounced population aging, with residents aged 60 and above accounting for 41.1% of the total population by 2023. The intersection of high population density and an increasingly older adults population may contribute to elevated cardiovascular risks, making Baoshan a representative case for exploring the relationship between the built environment and cardiovascular health.
Given the high prevalence of stroke among the older adults and its well-documented sensitivity to environmental risk factors, this study categorized participants as survivors or non-survivors based on their initial stroke admission outcomes, which served as a proxy for cardiovascular health status. This approach has been employed in some studies examining the relationship between the built environment and cardiovascular disease (45, 46). A binary health outcome variable was therefore constructed to represent initial stroke severity: “0” denoting survival and “1” denoting death at the initial onset of stroke. Daily stroke incidence data in 2018 were obtained from the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) in Baoshan District. This comprehensive surveillance system captures patient admissions across all levels of medical institutions, including private clinics, community health centers, and public hospitals, ensuring wide coverage and high data reliability. The dataset includes critical patient-level information such as age, gender, date of death, and residential address.
To align with the study’s focus on older adults at elevated cardiovascular risk, the sample was restricted to long-term residents of Baoshan District aged 60–80 years. In determining the minimum residence duration, we referred to previous longitudinal studies examining the relationship between built environment and cardiovascular outcomes. Specifically, a Dutch study based on the Obesogenic Built-environmental Characteristics (OBCT) cohort followed participants for 14 years (47), while a longitudinal study in London, UK reported an average follow-up of 8.4 years (48). Accordingly, we defined the minimum residence period in our study as the average of these durations, i.e., 11 years, ensuring that participants had sufficient long-term exposure to the local environment to plausibly influence cardiovascular health. After applying these criteria, the final dataset included 2,579 anonymized stroke cases. Residential addresses were geocoded using the Baidu Map API to support spatial analysis (see Figure 2).
3.3 Built environment variables
Based on residential addresses, we were able to pinpoint the locations of participants on the map using ArcGIS Geocoding tool. To define 15-min walkable neighbourhoods for older adults, we created 1,000-meter street-based network buffers around each residence using ArcGIS Network Analyst (see Figure 3). The network buffer represents the area reachable within 15 min based on actual walking paths, excluding non-walkable roads such as highways. Older adults typically walk at 48–60 meters per minute (49), making 1,000 meters a reasonable estimate for a 15-min walk. Compared to circular buffers or administrative boundaries, this method more accurately reflects the built environment people experience in daily life (12, 17).
We selected built environment variables known to influence residents’ behavior and environmental exposure (19, 50), following the guidelines set by the Shanghai Planning Guidance for the 15-min Community-Life Circle. A total of 19 variables across five categories were included, with detailed definitions and calculation methods provided in Table 2. Data sources included point of interest (POI) data for service facilities from Baidu Map,1 vector road network data from OpenStreetMap2 as of 2018, and current land use and building data (2018) from the Shanghai Land Resources & Planning Information Center. Additionally, street view greenery was incorporated to represent residents’ perceived street-level environmental quality (33).
3.4 Covariates
Due to the unavailability of individual-level data on income and education, we used a neighborhood deprivation index to represent socioeconomic status as a potential confounder (51, 52). This index captures material and social deprivation across five domains: poverty, employment, housing, education, and demographic characteristics. Following the approaches of (53, 54), we obtained community-level indicators from the 6th Shanghai National Census (2010), including the proportion of low-income residents, the proportion of unemployed residents, the proportion of individuals with no formal education, the proportion of households with a residential building area below 29 m2 (the smallest category in the official classification), and the proportion of residents without local household registration (55). These indicators were integrated using principal component analysis (PCA) to construct the neighborhood deprivation index, which was subsequently categorized into tertiles for stratified analysis: tertile 1 (least deprived), tertile 2 (moderately deprived), and tertile 3 (most deprived). All models were further adjusted for gender, age, and distance to the nearest emergency department, given their potential influence on cardiovascular outcomes. A summary of all variables is provided in Table 2.
3.5 Statistical analysis
To address multicollinearity, we excluded variables with a variance inflation factor (VIF) greater than 3. We then employed binary logistic regression models to examine the association between built environment characteristics within 15-min walkable neighborhoods and initial stroke severity (0 = survival, 1 = death). Model 1a assessed the overall population. Models 2a and 2b conducted stratified analyses by gender, while Models 3a, 3b, and 3c examined effects across tertiles of neighborhood deprivation (least-, medium-, and most-deprived). All models controlled for age, gender, and distance to the nearest emergency department. Two-tailed p-values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and all analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.
The general form of the logistic regression model used is:
Where Y represents initial stroke severity (0 = survival, 1 = death), X1, X2,……, Xk denote covariates including built environment characteristics, age, gender, and distance to the nearest emergency department, and β0, β1, ……, βk are the regression coefficients.
4 Results
Table 3 summarizes the associations between built environment characteristics within 15-min walkable neighborhoods and stroke mortality, both for the overall sample and stratified by gender. The results show that older adults residing in areas with moderate building density (22.6–37.6%) and a higher proportion of industrial land use (0.3–9.9%) had an increased likelihood of stroke-related mortality (OR = 1.397, 95% CI: 0.971–2.008; and OR = 1.573, 95% CI: 0.997–2.479, respectively). A greater number of metro stations was also associated with elevated stroke mortality risk (OR = 1.480, 95% CI: 1.166–1.879). In contrast, higher levels of greenness, as measured by the average Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (0.002–0.196), were significantly associated with lower odds of stroke mortality (OR = 0.650, 95% CI: 0.488–0.866). Regarding streetscape features, areas with moderate sidewalk coverage (0.023–0.049) showed a positive association with stroke mortality (OR = 1.483, 95% CI: 1.043–2.107). Conversely, greater visual exposure to greenery and sky demonstrated potential protective effects (OR = 0.705, 95% CI: 0.472–1.053; and OR = 0.660, 95% CI: 0.436–0.997, respectively). These associations were generally more pronounced among male participants, suggesting possible gender-specific sensitivities to built environment influences on cardiovascular health.
Table 3. The association between the built environment within the 15-min neighborhood and stroke mortality for all populations and stratified by gender.
Table 4 presents the associations between built environment characteristics and stroke mortality among older adults, stratified by neighborhood deprivation tertiles. In least-deprived neighborhoods, a moderate proportion of sidewalks in the streetscape (0.023–0.049) was significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke mortality (OR = 2.583, 95% CI: 1.039–6.425; OR = 2.694, 95% CI: 1.020–7.111). In contrast, greater visual exposure to greenery and sky was associated with a lower risk, although not all associations reached statistical significance (OR = 0.945, 95% CI: 0.313–2.857; OR = 0.270, 95% CI: 0.059–1.242). In moderately deprived neighborhoods, higher road density (approximately 11–12.7 km/km2) and a greater number of metro stations were linked to significantly increased stroke mortality risk (OR = 3.506, 95% CI: 1.438–8.549; OR = 1.587, 95% CI: 1.000–2.519). Conversely, greater streetscape greenery was associated with a reduced risk of stroke mortality (OR = 0.414, 95% CI: 0.186–0.922). In most-deprived neighborhoods, higher building density was positively associated with stroke mortality, while a higher average NDVI was linked to a lower risk. Additionally, residential land coverage between 50.9 and 71.1% was significantly associated with reduced stroke mortality (OR = 0.399, 95% CI: 0.173–0.920). In contrast, residential land coverage above 71.2% showed a non-significant trend toward increased risk (OR = 1.024, 95% CI: 0.597–1.755).
Table 4. The heterogeneous effects of the built environment within the 15-min neighbourhood and initial stroke severity stratified by neighbourhood deprivation index.
5 Discussion
This study systematically examined the impact of micro-scale built environment characteristics on cardiovascular health among older adults, thereby contributing to the limited evidence on modifiable environmental determinants of cardiovascular outcomes in aging populations. Importantly, by incorporating neighborhood socioeconomic heterogeneity, our findings offer nuanced insights into the complex mechanisms through which neighborhood environments shape cardiovascular health in urban contexts.
A key finding of this study is the significant positive association between higher residential building density and poor cardiovascular health outcomes, including increased stroke mortality, particularly pronounced in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. This likely reflects the compounded negative effects of overcrowding, limited access to natural and recreational spaces, and generally poorer environmental quality—factors that collectively contribute to worsening cardiovascular health (28, 31). Overcrowded living conditions can elevate chronic stress levels and reduce opportunities for physical activity, while insufficient green and open spaces limit engagement in health-promoting behaviors such as walking and social interaction. Moreover, poorer environmental quality often results in higher exposure to air pollution and noise, which are well-known to impair cardiovascular function through mechanisms like elevated blood pressure, systemic inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction (56). These combined stressors create an unfavorable environment that exacerbates poor cardiovascular health among vulnerable older adults. Notably, our findings diverge from many Western studies where moderate residential density often correlates with health benefits by promoting walkability and social interaction (57). Instead, the results align more closely with emerging evidence from other Asian megacities (58, 59), suggesting that extremely high residential densities may impose health burdens on vulnerable populations such as older adults. This discrepancy may stem from differences in urban form, infrastructure quality, and social environment, underscoring the importance of context-specific investigations.
Additionally, our study identified a non-linear, U-shaped relationship between the proportion of residential land use and stroke mortality in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Specifically, stroke risk was lower when residential land use accounted for less than approximately 71.2% of total land area; beyond this threshold, the risk began to increase. This pattern suggests that a balanced land-use mix may facilitate greater accessibility to diverse destinations that encourage walking and active lifestyles (30). Conversely, excessive residential land use likely reflects land-use homogenization, which reduces functional diversity and limits residents’ exposure to environments conducive to physical activity and mental well-being (60). Our findings align with prior research from Kuala Lumpur reporting similar non-linear associations between land-use composition and cardiovascular outcomes, highlighting land-use diversity as a key feature in health-oriented neighborhood planning (61). This non-linear association underscores the importance of considering not just the quantity but also the composition and configuration of land uses when designing urban environments for aging populations. Policies that promote mixed-use development—integrating residential, commercial, recreational, and green spaces—may enhance active living and reduce stroke risk, especially in deprived areas where environmental and social vulnerabilities are more pronounced.
Our study highlights the significant protective effects of neighborhood greenness on cardiovascular health, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. These findings underscore the critical role of green spaces in promoting cardiovascular health through multiple pathways, including the encouragement of physical activity, mitigation of psychological stress, and enhancement of air quality (62, 63). Furthermore, we found that greater street visibility of sky and greenery was associated with improved cardiovascular health, especially in socioeconomically advantaged neighborhoods. Importantly, our results demonstrate that neighborhood greenness, as quantified by average NDVI, supports the Equigenesis hypothesis, suggesting that environmental improvements yield disproportionately greater cardiovascular health benefits for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups (64, 65). Conversely, streetscape greenery measured as visible green exposure at the street level did not follow this pattern. Instead, its protective effects on cardiovascular health were more pronounced in affluent neighborhoods, diverging from findings reported by Wang et al. in Guangzhou, where street-level greenery conferred stronger benefits for disadvantaged groups (33). These observations suggest that different types of green exposure, namely, macro-scale neighborhood vegetation versus micro-scale streetscape features, may influence cardiovascular health through distinct mechanisms and are experienced differently across socioeconomic groups (66, 67).
In contrast to much of the existing literature, the present study identified a positive association between the density of metro stations within a 15-min walking radius and poorer cardiovascular health outcomes. This counterintuitive finding may be attributable to the distinctive characteristics of transit-oriented development in Chinese megacities (68), where metro stations are frequently located in densely populated and highly urbanized zones that are subject to elevated levels of air pollution, noise, and heat (69). These adverse environmental exposures may offset the physical activity benefits that are typically associated with public transit use (70, 71). Moreover, the density of metro stations may function as a proxy for urban intensity and traffic-related pollutant exposure rather than reflecting improved accessibility in itself, or it may indicate the spatial clustering of higher-risk populations in transit-rich areas. Besides, proximity to arterial roads was also found to be associated with increased stroke mortality, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. In such contexts, heavy traffic, vehicular emissions, and excessive noise contribute to adverse cardiovascular outcomes through pathways involving systemic inflammation and oxidative stress (72). Taken together, these findings suggest that expanding transit infrastructure without simultaneously addressing broader environmental quality concerns may fail to achieve the intended cardiovascular health benefits.
In contrast, the presence of sidewalks exhibited an unexpected positive association with poorer cardiovascular outcomes, diverging from the prevailing literature that typically identifies sidewalks as facilitators of walkability and active living. One plausible explanation lies in the distinctive urban morphology of high-density Chinese megacities (73). While wide sidewalks may signal infrastructural readiness for pedestrian activity, they frequently adjoin multi-lane arterial roads characterized by heavy traffic volumes, suboptimal pedestrian-scale design, and insufficient visual or physical buffers from vehicular flows. These conditions may foster perceptions of unsafety, discomfort, and environmental stress, particularly among older adults with mobility limitations. Furthermore, sidewalks in certain districts may suffer from underutilization or inadequate maintenance, diminishing their functional contribution to physical activity promotion. Similar findings have been reported in Seoul (34), where conventional walkability indicators failed to translate into increased walking due to adverse environmental conditions. Consequently, the health implications of sidewalk provision should be interpreted within a broader contextual framework that incorporates aesthetic, environmental, and behavioral mediators, rather than as a unidimensional infrastructure metric.
This study has several limitations. First, as an ecological cross-sectional analysis, it cannot establish causal relationships between built environment characteristics and stroke mortality. Future research should adopt more rigorous designs, such as quasi-experimental or longitudinal approaches, to better evaluate the causal impact of built environment features on cardiovascular health. Second, due to data limitations, this study was unable to control for key individual-level factors such as education, occupation, income, medical history, physical activity, and family history, as well as potential environmental factors including meteorological variables (e.g., wind speed and temperature). Future studies should integrate individual-level health data with environmental exposure information to enhance the explanatory power and scientific validity of the findings. Third, differences in urban contexts across studies and geographic variations between countries lead to distinct lifestyles and living environments. In particular, within Western contexts, significant inequalities exist between the Global North and South, where cities in Latin America and the Caribbean often face greater vulnerability in terms of living conditions, urban infrastructure, and socioeconomic factors. Therefore, future research could consider comparative analyses among Chinese or Western cities or districts with similar size and urban structures to verify potential convergences in the evidence and further enrich the empirical understanding of the relationship between the built environment and cardiovascular health.
6 Conclusion
This study offers new empirical evidence on the associations between micro-scale built environment characteristics and cardiovascular health among older adults, with a particular focus on socioeconomic disparities. The findings show that certain urban design features, including high residential building density, excessive residential land coverage, limited greenery, proximity to major roads, and a greater number of metro stations, are associated with poorer cardiovascular health outcomes, especially among older adults living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. In contrast, greater availability of green space and enhanced visual openness, such as visible sky and streetscape greenery, are linked to better cardiovascular health, particularly in more affluent areas.
Based on the findings of this study, the following planning strategies are proposed to improve cardiovascular health outcomes among older adults, with particular attention to addressing socioeconomic disparities. Urban planning should prioritize the creation and equitable distribution of high-quality green spaces, especially in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Increasing access to parks, vegetation, and visually open environments can help mitigate environmental stressors such as air pollution and psychosocial strain. Incorporating natural elements like trees and visible sky into neighborhood design may encourage outdoor activity, reduce stress, and promote recovery, all of which contribute to improved cardiovascular health. Moreover, planners should adopt human-scaled, mixed-use development strategies that reduce land-use homogenization and improve access to essential services. This includes integrating housing, healthcare, retail, and recreational spaces within walkable neighborhoods to reduce reliance on motorized transport. Special attention should be given to streetscape design by incorporating greenery, shade, and traffic-calming features to ensure a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment, particularly for older adults. Additionally, buffer zones and vegetation barriers should be considered near major roads and transit corridors to reduce residents’ exposure to noise and air pollution. These evidence-based strategies can support active aging and help build more inclusive, healthy, and resilient urban communities. By aligning urban development strategies with public health objectives, particularly for aging and vulnerable populations, these evidence-based approaches can help create healthier, more resilient, and more equitable cities.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Shanghai Baoshan District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
CW: Writing – original draft. XL: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. YX: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft. YM: Visualization, Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Validation, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Software. JW: Visualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Software.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Medical and Health Project of the Shanghai Baoshan District Science and Technology Commission (2023-E-45).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
References
1. Kim, J, Thayabaranathan, T, Donnan, GA, Howard, G, Howard, VJ, Rothwell, PM, et al. Global stroke statistics 2019. Int J Stroke. (2020) 15:819–38. doi: 10.1177/1747493020909545
2. Feigin, VL, and Owolabi, MWorld Stroke Organization–Lancet Neurology Commission Stroke Collaboration Group. Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke a world stroke organization-lancet commission. Lancet Neurol. (2023) 22:1160–206. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00277-6
3. National Center For Cardiovascular Diseases The Writing Committee Of The Report On Cardiovascular Health And Diseases In China. Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2023: An Updated Summary. Biomed Environ Sci, 2024. (2024) 37:949–92. doi: 10.3967/bes2024.162
4. Xu, JW, Jing, Y, Xu, X, Zhang, X, Liu, Y, He, H, et al. Spatial scale analysis for the relationships between the built environment and cardiovascular disease based on multi-source data. Health Place. (2023) 83:103048. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103048
5. Li, X, and Zhang, W. The impacts of health insurance on health care utilization among the older people in China. Soc Sci Med. (2013) 85:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.037
6. Patino, JE, Hong, A, Duque, JC, Rahimi, K, Zapata, S, and Lopera, VM. Built environment and mortality risk from cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Medellin, Colombia: an ecological study. Landsc Urban Plann. (2021) 213:104126. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104126
7. Koohsari, MJ, McCormack, GR, Nakaya, T, and Oka, K. Neighbourhood built environment and cardiovascular disease: knowledge and future directions. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2020) 17:261–3. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0343-6
8. Sallis, JF, Floyd, MF, Rodríguez, DA, and Saelens, BE. Role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. (2012) 125:729–37. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.969022
9. Ewing, R, and Cervero, R. Travel and the built environment. J Am Plan Assoc. (2010) 76:265–94. doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766
10. Yen, IH, Michael, YL, and Perdue, L. Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. (2009) 37:455–63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.022
11. Logan, TM, Hobbs, MH, Conrow, LC, Reid, NL, Young, RA, and Anderson, MJ. The x-minute city: measuring the 10, 15, 20-minute city and an evaluation of its use for sustainable urban design. Cities. (2022) 131:103924. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103924
12. Caselli, B, Carra, M, Rossetti, S, and Zazzi, M. Exploring the 15-minute neighbourhoods. An evaluation based on the walkability performance to public facilities. Transp Res Proc. (2022) 60:346–53. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.045
13. Lang, JJ, Pinault, L, Colley, RC, Prince, SA, Christidis, T, Tjepkema, M, et al. Neighbourhood walkability and mortality: findings from a 15-year follow-up of a nationally representative cohort of Canadian adults in urban areas. Environ Int. (2022) 161:107141. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107141
14. Yang, Y, Qian, Y, Zeng, J, Wei, X, and Yang, M. Walkability measurement of 15-minute community life circle in Shanghai. Land. (2023) 12:153. doi: 10.3390/land12010153
15. Jiang, ZH, Wu, CL, and Chung, HYC. The 15-minute community life circle for older people: walkability measurement based on service accessibility and street-level built environment - a case study of Suzhou, China. Cities. (2025) 157:105587. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105587
16. Mouratidis, K. Time to challenge the 15-minute city: seven pitfalls for sustainability, equity, livability, and spatial analysis. Cities. (2024) 153:105274. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105274
17. Weng, M, Ding, N, Li, J, Jin, X, Xiao, H, He, Z, et al. The 15-minute walkable neighborhoods: measurement, social inequalities and implications for building healthy communities in urban China. J Transp Health. (2019) 13:259–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.005
18. Lin, L, and Chen, TY. The activity space and the 15-minute neighborhood: An empirical study using big data in Qingdao, China. J Transp Land Use. (2023) 16:1–17. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2023.2159
19. Frank, LD, Iroz-Elardo, N, MacLeod, KE, and Hong, A. Pathways from built environment to health: a conceptual framework linking behavior and exposure-based impacts. J Transp Health. (2019) 12:319–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2018.11.008
20. Münzel, T, Schmidt, FP, Steven, S, Herzog, J, Daiber, A, and Sørensen, M. Environmental noise and the cardiovascular system. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 71:688–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.015
21. Chen, J, Zhou, M, Yang, J, Yin, P, Wang, B, Ou, CQ, et al. The modifying effects of heat and cold wave characteristics on cardiovascular mortality in 31 major Chinese cities. Environ Res Lett. (2020) 15:105009. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abaea0
22. Yin, Q, and Wang, JF. The association between consecutive days' heat wave and cardiovascular disease mortality in Beijing, China. BMC Public Health. (2017) 17:17. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4129-7
23. Haddad, P, Kutlar Joss, M, Weuve, J, Vienneau, D, Atkinson, R, Brook, J, et al. Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyg Environ Health. (2023) 247:114079. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.114079
24. Liu, T, Newman, WE, and Browning, MHEM. Daily Green exposure, mobility, and health: a scoping review. Sustainability. (2024) 16:3412. doi: 10.3390/su16083412
25. Durand, CP, Andalib, M, Dunton, GF, Wolch, J, and Pentz, MA. A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning. Obes Rev. (2011) 12:e173–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00826.x
26. Lu, Y, Xiao, Y, and Ye, Y. Urban density, diversity and design: is more always better for walking? A study from Hong Kong. Prev Med. (2017) 103:S99–S103. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.042
27. Iamtrakul, P, and Chayphong, S. Analyzing the link between built environment and physical activity: a spatial study in suburban area. Frontiers. Built Environ. (2024) 10:10. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2024.1420020
28. Xie, B, Jiao, J, An, Z, Zheng, Y, and Li, Z. Deciphering the stroke-built environment nexus in transitional cities: conceptual framework, empirical evidence, and implications for proactive planning intervention. Cities. (2019) 94:116–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.035
29. Ho, HC, Guo, H, Chan, TC, Shi, Y, Webster, C, and Fong, KNK. Community planning for a "healthy built environment" via a human-environment nexus? A multifactorial assessment of environmental characteristics and age-specific stroke mortality in Hong Kong. Chemosphere. (2022) 287:132043. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132043
30. Kwan, SC, Ismail, R, Ismail, NH, and Mohamed, N. An ecological study of the relationship between urban built environment and cardiovascular hospital admissions (2004−2016) in an Asian developing country. Soc Sci Med. (2021) 276:113868. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113868
31. Xie, H, Wang, Q, Zhou, X, Yang, Y, Mao, Y, and Zhang, X. Built environment factors influencing prevalence of hypertension at community level in China: the case of Wuhan. Sustainability. (2021) 13:5580. doi: 10.3390/su13105580
32. Su, S, Zhang, Q, Pi, J, Wan, C, and Weng, M. Public health in linkage to land use: theoretical framework, empirical evidence, and critical implications for reconnecting health promotion to land use policy. Land Use Policy. (2016) 57:605–18. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.030
33. Wang, R, Dong, P, Dong, G, Xiao, X, Huang, J, Yang, L, et al. Exploring the impacts of street-level greenspace on stroke and cardiovascular diseases in Chinese adults. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. (2022) 243:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113974
34. Xu, JW, Liu, Y, Liu, Y, An, R, and Tong, Z. Integrating street view images and deep learning to explore the association between human perceptions of the built environment and cardiovascular disease in older adults. Soc Sci Med. (2023) 338:116304. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116304
35. Weimann, H, Rylander, L, van den Bosch, MA, Albin, M, Skärbäck, E, Grahn, P, et al. Perception of safety is a prerequisite for the association between neighbourhood green qualities and physical activity: results from a cross-sectional study in Sweden. Health Place. (2017) 45:124–30. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.011
36. Xu, MY, Xin, J, Su, S, Weng, M, and Cai, Z. Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: the role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics. J Transp Geogr. (2017) 62:38–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.05.010
37. McKenzie, BS. Neighborhood access to transit by race, ethnicity, and poverty in Portland, OR. City Comm. (2013) 12:134–55. doi: 10.1111/cico.12022
38. Hawthorne, TL, and Kwan, MP. Using GIS and perceived distance to understand the unequal geographies of healthcare in lower-income urban neighbourhoods. Geogr J. (2012) 178:18–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00411.x
39. Su, SL, Li, Z, Xu, M, Cai, Z, and Weng, M. A geo-big data approach to intra-urban food deserts: transit-varying accessibility, social inequalities, and implications for urban planning. Habitat Int. (2017) 64:22–40. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.007
40. Héritier, H, Vienneau, D, Foraster, M, Eze, IC, Schaffner, E, Thiesse, L, et al. Transportation noise exposure and cardiovascular mortality: a nationwide cohort study from Switzerland. Eur J Epidemiol. (2017) 32:307–15. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0234-2
41. Raymond, CM, Gottwald, S, Kuoppa, J, and Kyttä, M. Integrating multiple elements of environmental justice into urban blue space planning using public participation geographic information systems. Landsc Urban Plan. (2016) 153:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.005
42. Yeager, R, Riggs, DW, DeJarnett, N, Tollerud, DJ, Wilson, J, Conklin, DJ, et al. Association between residential greenness and cardiovascular disease risk. J Am Heart Assoc. (2018) 7:e009117. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009117
43. Wang, R, Grekousis, G, and Lu, Y. Rethinking the link between the availability of neighborhood PA facilities and PA behavior: a comparison between private and public housing. Build Environ. (2022) 207:108401. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108401
44. Li, FZ, Harmer, P, Cardinal, BJ, and Vongjaturapat, N. Built environment and changes in blood pressure in middle aged and older adults. Prev Med. (2009) 48:237–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.01.005
45. Yao, Y, Yin, H, Xu, C, Chen, D, Shao, L, Guan, Q, et al. Assessing myocardial infarction severity from the urban environment perspective in Wuhan, China. J Environ Manag. (2022) 317:115438. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115438
46. Yao, Y, Xu, C, Yin, H, Shao, L, and Wang, R. More visible greenspace, stronger heart? Evidence from ischaemic heart disease emergency department visits by middle-aged and older adults in Hubei, China. Landsc Urban Plan. (2022) 224:104444. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104444
47. Meijer, P, Lam, TM, Beulens, JW, Grobbee, DE, Lakerveld, J, and Vaartjes, I. Association between the Dutch obesogenic built-environmental CharacterisTics (OBCT) index and 14-year cardiovascular disease incidence: a population-based cohort study of 4.4 million adults. Lancet Reg Health Europe. (2025) 59:101494. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101494
48. Hajna, S, Nafilyan, V, and Cummins, S. Associations between residential greenspace exposure and mortality in 4 645 581 adults living in London, UK: a longitudinal study. Lancet Planet Health. (2023) 7:E459–68. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00057-8
49. Bohannon, RW, and Andrews, AW. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. (2011) 97:182–9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004
50. Nieuwenhuijsen, MJ. Urban and transport planning, environmental exposures and health-new concepts, methods and tools to improve health in cities. Environ Health. (2016) 15:38. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0108-1
51. Pampalon, R, and Raymond, G. A deprivation index for health and welfare planning in Quebec. Chronic Dis Can. (2000) 21:104–13.
52. Green, BB, Larson, AE, Huguet, N, Angier, H, Valenzuela, S, and Marino, M. High blood pressure reduction, health insurance status, and social deprivation index in U.S. community health centers. AJPM Focus. (2022) 1:100018. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100018
53. Wan, C, and Su, SL. Neighborhood housing deprivation and public health: Theoretical linkage, empirical evidence, and implications for urban planning. Habitat Int. (2016) 57:11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.010
54. Yuan, Y, and Wu, FL. Regional social inequalities and social deprivation in guangdong province, china. Growth and Change. (2013) 44:149–167. doi: 10.1111/grow.12005
55. Letarte, L, Samadoulougou, S, McKay, R, Quesnel-Vallée, A, Waygood, EOD, Lebel, A, et al. Neighborhood deprivation and obesity: sex-specific effects of cross-sectional, cumulative and residential trajectory indicators. Soc Sci Med. (2022) 306:115049. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115049
56. Kroesen, M, and van Wee, B. Understanding how accessibility influences health via active travel: results from a structural equation model. J Transp Geogr. (2022) 102:103379. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103379
57. Gascon, M, Triguero-Mas, M, Martínez, D, Dadvand, P, Rojas-Rueda, D, Plasència, A, et al. Residential green spaces and mortality: a systematic review. Environ Int. (2016) 86:60–7. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.013
58. Niculita-Hirzel, H, Hirzel, AH, and Wild, P. A GIS-based approach to assess the influence of the urban built environment on cardiac and respiratory outcomes in older adults. Build Environ. (2024) 253:111362. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111362
59. Makram, OM, Nwana, N, Pan, A, Nicolas, JC, Gullapelli, R, Bose, B, et al. Interplay between residential nature exposure and walkability and their association with cardiovascular health. JACC Adv. (2025) 4:101457. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101457
60. Frank, LD, Schmid, TL, Sallis, JF, Chapman, J, and Saelens, BE. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form - findings from SMARTRAQ. Am J Prev Med. (2005) 28:117–25. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
61. Agarwal, M, and Tandon, A. Modeling of the urban heat island in the form of mesoscale wind and of its effect on air pollution dispersal. Appl Math Model. (2010) 34:2520–30. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.11.016
62. Bowler, DE, Buyung-Ali, L, Knight, TM, and Pullin, AS. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landsc Urban Plan. (2010) 97:147–55. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
63. Motomura, M, Koohsari, MJ, Lin, CY, Ishii, K, Shibata, A, Nakaya, T, et al. Associations of public open space attributes with active and sedentary behaviors in dense urban areas: a systematic review of observational studies. Health Place. (2022) 75:102816. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102816
64. Mitchell, R, and Popham, F. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet. (2008) 372:1655–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X
65. Holman, D, Bell, A, Green, M, and Salway, S. Neighbourhood deprivation and intersectional inequalities in biomarkers of healthy ageing in England. Health Place. (2022) 77:102871. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102871
66. Mears, M, Brindley, P, Jorgensen, A, and Maheswaran, R. Population-level linkages between urban greenspace and health inequality: the case for using multiple indicators of neighbourhood greenspace. Health Place. (2020) 62:102284. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102284
67. Liu, Y, Zhao, B, Cheng, Y, Zhao, T, Zhang, A, Cheng, S, et al. Does the quality of street greenspace matter? Examining the associations between multiple greenspace exposures and chronic health conditions of urban residents in a rapidly urbanising Chinese city. Environ Res. (2023) 222:115344. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115344
68. Cervero, R, and Day, J. Suburbanization and transit-oriented development in China. Transp Policy. (2008) 15:315–23. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.011
69. Hong, J. Non-linear influences of the built environment on transportation emissions: focusing on densities. J Transp Land Use. (2017) 10:229–40.
70. Calvo, F, de Oña, J, and Arán, F. Impact of the Madrid subway on population settlement and land use. Land Use Policy. (2013) 31:627–39. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.008
71. Xiao, CH, Yang, Y, and Chi, GQ. Subway development and obesity: evidence from China. J Transp Health. (2021) 21:101065. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101065
72. Narvaez-Valderrama, JF, González, JD, Trejos-Zapata, N, Cañizarez-Sanguino, SJ, Zuluaga-Viscaya, JN, and Diaz-Ruiz, LV. Noise exposure and its effect on heart rate, blood pressure, and cortisol levels: a review. Iatreia. (2023) 36:525–37.
73. Phan, L, Yu, W, Keralis, JM, Mukhija, K, Dwivedi, P, Brunisholz, KD, et al. Google street view derived built environment indicators and associations with state-level obesity, physical activity, and chronic disease mortality in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:3659. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103659
74. Li, K, Wang, LT, and Feng, MH. Relationship between built environments and risks of ischemic stroke based on meteorological factors: a case study of Wuhan's main urban area. Sci Total Environ. (2021) 769:144331. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144331
75. Li, X, Zhou, L, Liu, X, Dun, Q, Ma, L, and Zou, Y. Community built environment and the associated ischemic heart disease risk: evidence from multi-source data in Wuhan, China. J Transp Health. (2022) 25:101371. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101371
76. Wilker, EH, Wu, CD, McNeely, E, Mostofsky, E, Spengler, J, Wellenius, GA, et al. Green space and mortality following ischemic stroke. Environ Res. (2014) 133:42–8. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.05.005
77. Paquet, C, Orschulok, TP, Coffee, NT, Howard, NJ, Hugo, G, Taylor, AW, et al. Are accessibility and characteristics of public open spaces associated with a better cardiometabolic health? Landsc Urban Plann. (2013) 118:70–8. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.011
78. Kan, HD, Heiss, G, Rose, KM, Whitsel, EA, Lurmann, F, and London, SJ. Prospective analysis of traffic exposure as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Environ Health Perspect. (2008) 116:1463–8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11290
79. Chum, A, and O'Campo, P. Cross-sectional associations between residential environmental exposures and cardiovascular diseases. BMC Public Health. (2015) 15:15. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1788-0
80. Avila-Palencia, I, Rodríguez, DA, Miranda, JJ, Moore, K, Gouveia, N, Moran, MR, et al. Associations of urban environment features with hypertension and blood pressure across 230 Latin American cities. Environ Health Perspect. (2022) 130:27010. doi: 10.1289/EHP7870
81. Unger, E, Diez-Roux, AV, Lloyd-Jones, DM, Mujahid, MS, Nettleton, JA, Bertoni, A, et al. Association of neighborhood characteristics with cardiovascular health in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. (2014) 7:524–31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000698
82. Li, Y, Mallinson, PAC, Bhan, N, Turner, C, Bhogadi, S, Sharma, C, et al. Neighborhood physical food environment and cardiovascular risk factors in India: cross-sectional evidence from APCAPS. Environ Int. (2019) 132:105108. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105108
83. Chum, A, and Patricia, O. Contextual determinants of cardiovascular diseases: overcoming the residential trap by accounting for non-residential context and duration of exposure. Health Place. (2013) 24:73–9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.07.007
84. China Academy of Urban Planning and Design. Available online at: https://www.chinautc.com/templates/H_groupsecond/people.aspx?nodeid=33&page=ContentPage&contentid=92331
85. Wu, W, Tan, W, Wang, R, and Chen, WY. From quantity to quality: effects of urban greenness on life satisfaction and social inequality. Landsc Urban Plan. (2023) 238:104843. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104843
Keywords: cardiovascular health, 15-min walkable neighborhood, cross-sectional study, older adults, health disparity
Citation: Wu C, Liu X, Xu Y, Meng Y and Wu J (2025) Rethinking 15-min walkable neighborhoods for healthy aging: evidence from cardiovascular health in Shanghai’s older adults. Front. Public Health. 13:1687414. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1687414
Edited by:
Dong Wei, Southwest Jiaotong University, ChinaReviewed by:
Patricia M. Alt, Towson University, United StatesDaniella do Amaral Mello Bonatto, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil
Copyright © 2025 Wu, Liu, Xu, Meng and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yanting Xu, MjExMDI5N0B0b25namkuZWR1LmNu; Yang Meng, bWVuZ3lhbmdAYnNjZGMub3JnLmNu
XingZhao Liu2