Abstract
Preface: Recently, low-cost perovskite single crystals have attracted intensive attention due to their excellent optoelectronic properties and improved stability when compared to polycrystalline films for various applications, such as solar cells (Kojima et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2012; Tsai et al., 2016; Sahli et al., 2018), lasers (Gu et al., 2016; Veldhuis et al., 2016), radiation detection (Kim et al., 2017), and so on. The unique optoelectronic properties and low-cost growing processes for large-sized single crystals also make them greatly suitable for radiation detection. In this review, we summarize various synthesis methods of perovskite single crystals and introduced the high radiation detection performance of the perovskite single crystal. The advantages and limitations of halide perovskite single crystals as radiation detector candidates will be discussed in detail, and corresponding future development trends can be expected by overcoming current obstacles (Leijtens et al., 2018; Boyd et al., 2019), such as ion migration (Eames et al., 2015), stability, etc.
Introduction to Halide Perovskite Single Crystals
Halide perovskite single crystals arouse broad attention, since they can be grown from low-cost solution processes with great potential for future commercialization in optoelectronic devices, especially for radiation detectors. The unique physical and chemical properties of strong stopping power, absence of deep traps, large mu-tau [mobility (μ) and lifetime (τ), μτ] product, and easy crystallization from low-cost solution processes make perovskite single crystals suitable for next-generation ionization detection materials. The high performance and bright future of perovskite single crystals as X-ray imaging detectors, gamma ray detectors, and scintillators will be discussed in the review. While various methods appeared for growing perovskite single crystal, the crystalline processes are in line with traditional crystallization kinetic theory (Zhao et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2019), basically including nucleation and crystal growth. And the nucleation process, which is of paramount importance for the crystal quality, occurs at the beginning of the entire crystalline process. Crystalline speed and static equilibrium stability of saturation solution are the points for growing a high-quality and large-scale perovskite single crystal. As of now, various growth methods for perovskite single crystals with different composition, size, and exposed facets have been already reported. Herein, perovskite single crystals growth methods, including aqueous solution crystallization by cooling method (Yin et al., 2019), traditional high temperature Bridgman method (Stoumpos et al., 2013a), inverse temperature crystallization method (ITC) (Kadro et al., 2015; Saidaminov et al., 2015; Abdelhady et al., 2016; Zhumekenov et al., 2016), and anti-solvent vapor assisted method (ASV) (Shi et al., 2015; Rakita et al., 2016; Wei et al., 2016). The distinguished advantages of these methods will be discussed in detail.
Single Crystals Growth Strategy
Halide perovskite single crystal was first grown by gradually cooling the temperature of saturated solution from aqueous acid solution (Baikie et al., 2013; Stoumpos et al., 2013a; Pisoni et al., 2014; Dang et al., 2015). In the crystallization process, slowing down the cooling rate normally leads to larger single crystals with fewer seed crystals and higher quality single crystal with fewer defects (Figure 1A), which enables larger crystals dimensional sizes, smoother morphology, and a better optoelectronic performance (Yin et al., 2019). Similar to the controlled cooling processes, perovskite single crystals can be also grown from all-solid raw materials by the traditional high temperature Bridgman method (Stoumpos et al., 2013b; He et al., 2018). Despite the long amount of time and high energy consumption involved, raising temperature above solid's melting point is suitable for raw materials with low solubility, like all-inorganic perovskite. This method was always used to grow large-sized CsPbBr3 single crystal serving as radiation detection (Stoumpos et al., 2013a; He et al., 2018; Figure 1B). Furthermore, perovskite materials are discovered to represent good solubility in highly polar organic solvent, such as N, N-Dimethylformamide (DMF), Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), etc., and presents an inverse temperature crystallization process, which means lower solubility in higher temperatures within a certain temperature range. This crystallization process was so-called inverse temperature crystallization method (ITC); the crystallization velocity is an order magnitude faster than that of high temperature Bridgman method. ITC method attracted intensive investigations on perovskite crystallization.
Figure 1
ITC used for crystals with retrograde solubility allows the saturated solution to reach equilibrium and to be filtered at room temperature, as a result, maximizing the operation window, first. Then perovskite single crystals with inverse solubility can be grown at an elevated temperature, and growth velocity is always finely controlled by temperature (Figure 2A). A great deal of perovskite single crystals by ITC method have been reported as exhibiting excellent properties with fast growth velocity, tunable shape, and high optoelectronic performance, when compared with traditional crystal growth methods; and ITC method has been employed for kinds of high-quality perovskite crystals, such as methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI3), methylammonium lead tribromide (MAPbBr3), formamidinium lead triiodide (FAPbI3), etc. Figure 2B shows different perovskite crystallization processes in which a crystal seed is added into the saturated precursor solution by ITC method, and the crystal grows at faster crystallization rate, resulting in larger crystal size. This is mainly caused by the critical Gibbs free energy G* required for nucleation (Yang et al., 2015, 2017; Ummadisingu et al., 2017). Thus, when a seed occurs in the precursor solution (region II shown in Figure 2B), it can induce spontaneous crystal growth, shorten growth time, and result in a large-sized single crystal (Saidaminov et al., 2015; Han et al., 2016), otherwise, the crystal will disintegrate spontaneously in region I. Nevertheless, a continuously increased temperature during ITC method will inevitably cause the decomposition of perovskite and reduce the atomic utilization efficiency of raw materials.
Figure 2
Anti-solvent vapor-assisted crystallization (AVC) method can greatly improve the atomic utilization efficiency of raw materials. In this method, anti-solvent will gradually diffuse into perovskite solution and precipitate the crystals (Figure 2C). The crystal growth velocity is determined by the diffusion rate of anti-solvent, as well as the corresponding solubility difference in diverse mixture solvent. Another advantage of AVC method lies in that high-quality crystals can be grown at room temperature with low energy consumption (Rakita et al., 2016; Liu X. et al., 2018), which is more suitable for all-inorganic CsPbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) single crystals when compared to the traditional Bridgman and ITC processes. When mixing equal equivalent CsBr and PbBr2 into the solvent, non-stoichiometry crystal nucleus easily appears first in the precursor solution, owing to the mismatched solubility of PbBr2 and CsBr. Hence, to get single crystals with stoichiometric ratio, non-stoichiometry crystal nucleus is normally precluded first before entering into the crystal growth process. Then, the rest of the precursor solution with non-equivalent raw materials is filtered to grow crystals with CsPbBr3 composition. Moreover, another approach to growing CsPbBr3 single crystals is by directly changing the feeding ratio of the raw materials—the optimized ratio for CsBr:PbBr2 being 1:1.5 (Zhang et al., 2017). However, the limitation of AVC methods lies in that it is not easily scaled up in industry, and the reproducibility is not as promising as other methods.
Based on these synthesis methods, different kinds of high-quality perovskite single crystals are grown from solution with the aim to understand the physical and chemical properties of perovskite materials for potential optoelectronic applications. Nevertheless, the applications of perovskite materials in optoelectronic devices are mainly focused on the thin film devices rather than single crystal devices, which are basically limited by their thickness and scaling up problem. A thick semiconductor layer often results in a high potential of charge carrier recombination for solar cells devices and a high possibility of reabsorption of the radiative emission from deep inside for light-emitting diodes, since the photo-electric conversions of both these devices are related to the low-energy UV-visible photons. However, perovskite single crystals are actually appealing for high-energy photon detection. In this sense, the thickness of single crystal is an advantage for high attenuation efficiency, and the charges generated inside the crystal can be extracted by applying a bias voltage on the opposite electrodes.
Halide Perovskite Single Crystal Ionizing Detectors for Imaging
Semiconductor working in direct detection mode normally possesses high sensitivity and high spatial resolution of images. However, there are limited choices of semiconductors for direct detection mode, since it requires semiconductors of high atomic numbers for strong stopping power, large μτ product for high charge collection efficiency, low trap density for less noise and less non-radiative recombination. Halide perovskite single crystal has emerged as a new generation of ionization detection materials working in direct detection mode (Wei et al., 2016; Wei and Huang, 2019), which can directly convert the ionizing charges into readable current by driving the charges with a bias on opposite electrodes. Firstly, perovskite single crystals are easily grown from low-cost solution processes. The estimated price of a perovskite single crystal is about US$ 0.5–1.0 per cm3, when combined with the cost of raw materials and fabrication process (Yakunin et al., 2016). Secondly, perovskite single crystal advances in device performance as a candidate of radiation detector in terms of sensitivity, response speed, imaging spatial resolution, etc. The high atomic number of the elements Pb, Cs, Sn, I, and Br and the large density of perovskite result in comparable attenuation coefficient to CdZnTe, which is much higher than α-Se or Si semiconductors shown in Figure 3A (Huang et al., 2019). This is also the reason that Si cannot be employed for high-energy ionization detection material. Once again, the large μτ product and low trap density ensure a high charge collection efficiency under large bias, although there is polarization effect remaining unsolved for halide perovskite materials. Lastly, halide perovskite comprises a large family, including 3D materials with ABX3 structure, 2D materials with R2An−1BnX3n+1 structure, and double perovskite with A2MM′X6 structure. All of the A+, B2+, M+, M′3+, and R+ ions are variable by following the Goldschmidt tolerance factor principle to stabilize the perovskite phase (Goldschmidt, 1926), which is closely related to the ion's radius. A large variety of chemical and physical properties can be obtained from perovskite by fine-tuning the ions and structures.
Figure 3
MAPbBr3 single crystal has been demonstrated to be a promising X-ray imager, exhibiting excellent performance (Yakunin et al., 2015; Wei W. et al., 2017; Liu Y. et al., 2018). In addition, MAPbBr3 single crystal was also successfully integrated on Si devices showing a sensitivity to X-rays over 1,000 times greater than that of α-Se detectors and an ability to image at a 15 to 120-fold weaker X-ray flux, as depicted in Figure 3C. The device can detect a very low dose rate of <0.1 μGyairs−1 with a high sensitivity of 2.1 × 104 μC cm−2 to 8 keV X-rays, providing a strategy to obtain active-matrix flat-panel imagers for further commercialization application as X-ray detector in medical and security check (Wei W. et al., 2017). Also, lead-free perovskite single crystals have developed rapidly in recent years, and Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystal detector has realized a minimum detectable dose rate as low as 59.7 nGyairs−1, comparable to the reported MAPbBr3 (Pan et al., 2017). And, more stable 2D lead-free double perovskite single crystals of (BA)2CsBiBr7 and (NH4)3Bi2I9 have minimum detectable dose rate of 4.5 μGyairs−1 and 55 nGyairs−1, respectively, which are also comparable to that of MAPbBr3 single crystal (Xu et al., 2019; Zhuang et al., 2019).
Halide Perovskite Single Crystal Gamma Ray Detectors for Energy Spectroscopy
The decay of the majority of radioactive isotopes involves the irradiation of gamma (γ) photons with energies of ~200 keV to 10 MeV. Low-cost and highly sensitive detectors, which can operate at ambient temperature, are of critical importance for many applications, such as homeland defense, nuclear reaction inspection, research field, etc. (Milbrath et al., 2008; Sordo et al., 2009). Perovskite semiconductor is one type of promising radiation detection candidates with μτ product of 1 × 10−2 cm2 V−1, stopping power, and bulk resistivity comparable or even better than state-of-the-art detector material Cd1−xZnxTe (x <20%, denoted as CZT) or thallium (I) bromide (TlBr) devices. Furthermore, halide perovskite crystals can be grown from low-cost solution processes based on earth-abundant raw materials, which is more suitable for industrial production when compared to the high-temperature Bridgeman methods. Perovskite single crystals with various composition (MAPbI3, FAPbI3, CsPbBr3, I-treated/Cl-treated MAPbBr3) were applied to serve as solid-state gamma-detecting materials with comparable energy resolution to standard scintillator detectors (Yakunin et al., 2016; Wei H. et al., 2017; He et al., 2018; Wei and Huang, 2019), owing to their superior device signal/noise ratio, which is benefited from a large μτ product of 1.0–1.8 × 10−2 cm2 V−1 (Yakunin et al., 2016; Wei H. et al., 2017) and a low dark current and noise. All of these enable a promising device response to 59.5 keV 241Am γ-source, 122 keV 57Co source, and 662 keV 137Cs source with a sufficient energy resolution of 3.9% (Figure 3B), which is comparable to the commercial NaI (Tl) scintillator. However, the ion migration phenomenon can be still observed in these detection devices, resulting in continuous dark current drift and degraded energy spectrum resolution (Luo et al., 2017).
Perovskite Single Crystals as Scintillator
Scintillator is another kind of ionizing detector working in indirect detection mode, which converts high-energy X-ray photons to low-energy UV-visible photons upon irradiation. A sensitive photodetector is integrated with the scintillator to detect the emitting UV-visible photons (Figure 4A). Therefore, it is important for a scintillator to have: (1) thick single crystal with strong stopping power to fully attenuate the high-energy photons, and transparent enough to emit light with less scattering; (2) large light emission yield to convert the irradiation energy to detectable energy as much as possible; (3) large stokes shift to avoid reabsorption of the emission from the thick scintillator crystals; and (4) fast radiation recombination speed to reduce the response time. In order to satisfy these requirements, scintillator can be composed of 2D materials or quantum dots materials to confine the ionizing charges around a local area to increase the radiative recombination velocity (Zhou et al., 2017, 2018). Foreign ions are often doped into the bulk single crystals to act as radiative emission center, which is a general strategy to enlarge the stokes shift and increase the light emission yield (Cavouras et al., 1996; Uchiyama et al., 2001).
Figure 4
MAPbI3, MAPbBr3, and 2D (EDBE)2PbCl4 [EDBE = 2,2′-(ethylenedioxy)bis(ethylammoniu-m)] (Figure 4B) single crystals have been studied for scintillator application, and photoluminescence (PL) peak of MAPbI3 single crystal is centered at 780 nm. Meanwhile, PL peaks of MAPbBr3 and 2D (EDBE)PbCl4 locate at 550 and 520 nm, respectively (Figure 4B), which can match the common sensitive photodetector (Birowosuto et al., 2016). The bandgap emission of perovskite single crystal scintillator can be easily optimized through engineering of the composition. 2D perovskite structure with long chain organic spacer shows higher light yield (Li et al., 2019; Figure 4C). Recently, Rb2CuBr3 perovskite single crystal showed promising scintillator properties with a light yield of over 9 × 104 Photons/MeV, higher than traditional bright scintillators of CsI:Tl (5.4 × 104 Photons/MeV) and alginate-derived guluronate oligosaccharide (GOS) (6.0 × 104 Photons-/MeV) (Figure 4D), and reaching a low X-ray detection limit of 121.5 nGyairs−1 (Yang et al., 2019; Figure 4E).
Similar to the semiconductor in direct detection mode, scintillator single crystals also need a low trap density to avoid the non-radiative recombination in the scintillator material, which often leads to a slow components in scintillation decay and afterglow. Therefore, low trap density single crystals are also necessary for high-performance ionization detection. However, the fluorescence from emission center in single crystal is isotropic, which normally ruins the detectable light emitting yield when there is an absence of an integrating sphere and also results in a low spatial resolution by mutual interference with neighboring pixels on a flat panel (Grim et al., 2012; Heo et al., 2018; Burdette et al., 2019).
Improvement Strategies for Better Device Performance
Defects, which exist at both surface and bulk of perovskite single crystal, are detrimental for improving device performance in most cases despite absence of deep traps in halide perovskite materials (Shao et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019). Passivating the defects in perovskite is a necessary requirement for high-performance devices. MAPbI3, as a typical material in the halide perovskite family, is still rich of shallow defects such as Pb2+ interstitial and I− vacancy, and so on. To reduce the intrinsic bulk defects in MAPbI3 single crystal, large-sized A site cation was doped inside to tune tetragonal phase to more stable cubic phase (Figure 5A) by balancing opposite lattice distortion strains (Mitzi, 2001; Stoumpos et al., 2013b; Peng et al., 2016). Furthermore, long-chain organic cations as A site can result in the so-called quasi-2D perovskite structure, which is more ambient stable compared to the 3D structure halide perovskite (Peng et al., 2016). Moreover, 2D structure can also decrease electron–phonon coupling strength and increase material defects formation energy (Huang et al., 2019). Composition engineering, especially introducing large-sized cations of EA (ethylammonium), DMA (dimethylammonium), and GA (guaniddinium), can obviously increase the charge carrier lifetime and decrease the defect density (Figures 5B,C), i.e., increased μτ product (Peng et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2019), which is of great significance for radiation detectors. In addition to intrinsic bulk defects, crystal surface is also rich in shallow traps. UV-O3 treatment was employed to passivate the defects on MAPbBr3 single crystal top surface (Wei et al., 2016), revealing the Pb2+ dangling bonds passivated by forming oxygen–lead bonds after UV-O3 treatment (Figures 5D,E).
Figure 5
Another obstacle that should be faced for perovskite X-ray detector is the ions migration phenomenon, which normally results in the polarization effect in ionization detection (Eames et al., 2015; Luo et al., 2017; Wei and Huang, 2019). Suppressing the ions migration is challenging in perovskite ionizing detector since a large bias is often applied, and the ionic intrinsic properties of perovskite determine the low activation energy of mobile ions. One strategy to suppress the ions migration is to block the ion mobile path and elevate the corresponding activation energy. Low dimensional perovskite single crystal has long-term stability under operation condition (Smith et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2015; Tsai et al., 2016; Yuan et al., 2016), and the generic structural formula of 2D perovskite is A2Bn−1MnX3n+1 (n is integer), A+ is a primary aliphatic or aromatic alkylammonium cation, M2+ is a divalent metal, and X− is a halide anion. [MX6]4− forms octahedra frame structure, suitably sized B+ cation insert into the octahedra lattice, and bulky A+ cations form an organic spacer existing between the semiconducting inorganic layers, which can effectively suppress the ions migration (depicted in Figure 5F).
Summary and Future Prospects
As one of the high-performance semiconductors, perovskite is proposed to forge a bright future in the radiation detection field for its earth-abundant raw materials, low cost, feasible fabrication, and high-performance characteristics. However, the semiconductor's long-term instability limits its future application in many fields. To improve the long-term stability, researchers have reported various improvement strategies. 1, tuning the ratio of halide ions, such as chlorine incorporation into MAPbBr3 and bromine incorporation into MAPbI3, this can obviously improve the moisture stability of the perovskite (Noh et al., 2013; Wei H. et al., 2017; Boyd et al., 2019; Hieulle et al., 2019). 2, changing the halide into halide substitution, like totally or partly replacing halide with thiocyanate (SCN) ion (Jiang et al., 2015). 3, doping additives (i.e. quantum dots, polymer material and small organic molecules) in precursor (Wang et al., 2017; Hieulle et al., 2019; Yao et al., 2019). What‘s more, 2D perovskites [(A)2(B)n−1MnX3n+1 (n is integer)] have emerged as a more moisture stable material, and researchers designed more inter-molecular interactions in 2D perovskites by tunneling the A-site molecule, which have further improved the stability. On the other hand, researchers have reported lead-free perovskite as non-toxic substitutes, but the performance is still limited, so an urgent objective is to improve the performance of 2D perovskite and lead-free perovskite devices. Obtaining high-quality perovskite crystal materials is crucial for better device performance and stability, and the means of attaining a perovskite crystal with fewer defects and of a larger size remains obviously unsolved. More efforts are still needed to improve the synthesis techniques of the perovskite single crystals and to boost the performance of promising ionization detection applications.
Statements
Author contributions
HW and WP wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the commenting and review of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Young Talent Thousand Program, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, JLU and JLUSTIRT (2017TD-06), and the Opening funds of State Key Laboratory of Applied Optics, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Science.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbdelhadyA. L.SaidaminovM. I.MuraliB.AdinolfiV.VoznyyO.KatsievK.et al. (2016). Heterovalent dopant incorporation for bandgap and type engineering of perovskite crystals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.7, 295–301. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02681
2
BaikieT.FangY.KadroJ. M.SchreyerM.WeiF.MhaisalkarS. G.et al. (2013). Synthesis and crystal chemistry of the hybrid perovskite (CH3NH3)PbI3 for solid-state sensitised solar cell applications. J. Mater. Chem. A1, 5628–5641. 10.1039/c3ta10518k
3
BirowosutoM. D.CortecchiaD.DrozdowskiW.BrylewK.LachmanskiW.BrunoA.et al. (2016). X-ray scintillation in lead halide perovskite crystals. Sci. Rep.6:37254. 10.1038/srep37254
4
BoydC. C.CheacharoenR.LeijtensT.McGeheeM. D. (2019). Understanding degradation mechanisms and improving stability of perovskite photovoltaics. Chem. Rev.119, 3418–3451. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00336
5
BurdetteM. K.BanderaY. P.ZhangE.TrofimovA.DickeyA.FoulgerI.et al. (2019). Organic fluorophore coated polycrystalline ceramic LSO:Ce scintillators for X-ray bioimaging. Langmuir35, 171–182. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03129
6
CaoD. H.StoumposC. C.FarhaO. K.HuppJ. T.KanatzidisM. G. (2015). 2D homologous perovskites as light-absorbing materials for solar cell applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 7843–7850. 10.1021/jacs.5b03796
7
CavourasD.KandarakisI.PanayiotakisG. S.EvangelouE. K.NomicosC. D. (1996). An evaluation of the Y2O3:Eu3+ scintillator for application in medical x-ray detectors and image receptors. Med. Phys.23, 1965–1975. 10.1118/1.597769
8
ChenY.LiN.WangL.LiL.XuZ.JiaoH.et al. (2019). Impacts of alkaline on the defects property and crystallization kinetics in perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun.10:1112. 10.1038/s41467-019-09093-1
9
DangY.LiuY.SunY.YuanD.LiuX.LuW.et al. (2015). Bulk crystal growth of hybrid perovskite material CH3NH3PbI3. CrystEngComm17, 665–670. 10.1039/C4CE02106A
10
EamesC.FrostJ. M.BarnesP. R.O'ReganB. C.WalshA.IslamM. S. (2015). Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun.6:7497. 10.1038/ncomms8497
11
FrohnaK.DeshpandeT.HarterJ.PengW.BarkerB. A.NeatonJ. B.et al. (2018). Inversion symmetry and bulk Rashba effect in methylammonium lead iodide perovskite single crystals. Nat. Commun.9:1829. 10.1038/s41467-018-04212-w
12
GoldschmidtV. M. (1926). Die Gesetze der Krystallochemie. Naturwissenschaften14, 477–485. 10.1007/BF01507527
13
GrimJ. Q.LiQ.UcerK. B.BurgerA.BizarriG. A.MosesW. W.et al. (2012). The roles of thermalized and hot carrier diffusion in determining light yield and proportionality of scintillators. Physica Status Solidi (a)209, 2421–2426. 10.1002/pssa.201200436
14
GuZ.WangK.SunW.LiJ.LiuS.SongQ.et al. (2016). Two-photon pumped CH3NH3PbBr3 perovskite microwire lasers. Adv. Optic. Mater.4, 472–479. 10.1002/adom.201500597
15
HanQ.BaeS. H.SunP.HsiehY. T.YangY. M.RimY. S.et al. (2016). Single crystal formamidinium lead iodide (FAPbI3): insight into the structural, optical, and electrical properties. Adv. Mater.28, 2253–2258. 10.1002/adma.201505002
16
HeY.MateiL.JungH. J.McCallK. M.ChenM.StoumposC. C.et al. (2018). High spectral resolution of gamma-rays at room temperature by perovskite CsPbBr3 single crystals. Nat. Commun.9:1609. 10.1038/s41467-018-04073-3
17
HeoJ. H.ShinD. H.ParkJ. K.KimD. H.LeeS. J.ImS. H. (2018). High-performance next-generation perovskite nanocrystal scintillator for nondestructive X-ray imaging. Adv. Mater.30:1801743. 10.1002/adma.201801743
18
HieulleJ.WangX.SteckerC.SonD. Y.QiuL.OhmannR.et al. (2019). Unraveling the impact of halide mixing on perovskite stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 3515–3523. 10.1021/jacs.8b11210
19
HuangY.QiaoL.JiangY.HeT.LongR.YangF.et al. (2019). A-site cation engineering for highly efficient MAPbI3 single-crystal X-ray detector. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn. 58, 17834–17842. 10.1002/anie.201911281
20
JiangQ.RebollarD.GongJ.PiacentinoE. L.ZhengC.XuT. (2015). Pseudohalide-induced moisture tolerance in perovskite CH3NH3Pb(SCN)2I thin films. Angew. Chem.127, 7727–7730. 10.1002/ange.201503038
21
KadroJ. M.NonomuraK.GachetD.GrätzelM.HagfeldtA. (2015). Facile route to freestanding CH3NH3PbI3 crystals using inverse solubility. Sci. Rep.5:11654. 10.1038/srep11654
22
KimY. C.KimK. H.SonD. Y.JeongD. N.SeoJ. Y.ChoiY. S.et al. (2017). Printable organometallic perovskite enables large-area, low-dose X-ray imaging. Nature550, 87–91. 10.1038/nature24032
23
KojimaA.TeshimaK.ShiraiY.MiyasakaT. (2009). Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131, 6050–6051. 10.1021/ja809598r
24
LeeM. M.TeuscherJ.MiyasakaT.MurakamiT. N.SnaithH. J. (2012). Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science338, 643–647. 10.1126/science.1228604
25
LeijtensT.BushK. A.PrasannaR.McGeheeM. D. (2018). Opportunities and challenges for tandem solar cells using metal halide perovskite semiconductors. Nat. Energy3, 828–838. 10.1038/s41560-018-0190-4
26
LiY.ShaoW.OuyangX.ZhuZ.ZhangH.OuyangX.et al. (2019). Scintillation properties of perovskite single crystals. J. Phys. Chem. C123, 17449–17453. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05269
27
LiuX.ZhangH.ZhangB.DongJ.JieW.XuY. (2018). Charge transport behavior in solution-grown methylammonium lead tribromide perovskite single crystal using α particles. J. Phys. Chem. C122, 14355–14361. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03512
28
LiuY.ZhangY.ZhaoK.YangZ.FengJ.ZhangX.et al. (2018). A 1300 mm2 ultrahigh-performance digital imaging assembly using high-quality perovskite single crystals. Adv. Mater.30:1707314. 10.1002/adma.201707314
29
LuoY.KhoramP.BrittmanS.ZhuZ.LaiB.OngS. P.et al. (2017). Direct observation of halide migration and its effect on the photoluminescence of methylammonium lead bromide perovskite single crystals. Adv. Mater.29:1703451. 10.1002/adma.201703451
30
MilbrathB. D.PeurrungA. J.BlissM.WeberW. J. (2008). Radiation detector materials: an overview. J. Mater. Res23, 2561–2581. 10.1557/JMR.2008.0319
31
MitziD. B. (2001). Templating and structural engineering in organic–inorganic perovskites. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.2001, 1–12. 10.1039/b007070j
32
NiklM.YoshikawaA. (2015). Recent RandD trends in inorganic single-crystal scintillator materials for radiation detection. Adv. Optic. Mater.3, 463–481. 10.1002/adom.201400571
33
NohJ. H.ImS. H.HeoJ. H.MandalT. N.SeokS. I.et al. (2013). Chemical management for colorful, efficient, and stable inorganic–organic hybrid nanostructured solar cells. Nano Lett.13, 1764–1769. 10.1021/nl400349b
34
PanW.WuH.LuoJ.DengZ.GeC.ChenC.et al. (2017). Cs2AgBiBr6 single-crystal X-ray detectors with a low detection limit. Nat. Photonics11, 726–732. 10.1038/s41566-017-0012-4
35
PengW.MiaoX.AdinolfiV.AlarousuE.TallO. E.EmwasA. H.et al. (2016). Engineering of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite crystals by alloying large organic cations for enhanced thermal stability and transport properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn.55, 10686–10690. 10.1002/anie.201604880
36
PisoniA.JaćimovićJ.BarišićO. S.SpinaM.GaálR.ForróL.et al. (2014). Ultra-low thermal conductivity in organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite CH3NH3PbI3. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.5, 2488–2492. 10.1021/jz5012109
37
QuanL. N.YuanM.CominR.VoznyyO.BeauregardE. M.HooglandS.et al. (2016). Ligand-stabilized reduced-dimensionality perovskites. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 2649–2655. 10.1021/jacs.5b11740
38
RakitaY.KedemN.GuptaS.SadhanalaA.KalchenkoV.BöhmM. L.et al. (2016). Low-temperature solution-grown CsPbBr3 single crystals and their characterization. Cryst. Growth Des.16, 5717–5725. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00764
39
SahliF.WernerJ.KaminoB. A.BräuningerM.MonnardR.Paviet-SalomonB.et al. (2018). Fully textured monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with 25.2% power conversion efficiency. Nat. Mater.17, 820–826. 10.1038/s41563-018-0115-4
40
SaidaminovM. I.AbdelhadyA. L.MuraliB.AlarousuE.BurlakovV. M.PengW.et al. (2015). High-quality bulk hybrid perovskite single crystals within minutes by inverse temperature crystallization. Nat. Commun.6:7586. 10.1038/ncomms8586
41
ShaoY.XiaoZ.BiC.YuanY.HuangJ. (2014). Origin and elimination of photocurrent hysteresis by fullerene passivation in CH3NH3PbI3 planar heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Commun.5:5784. 10.1038/ncomms6784
42
ShiD.AdinolfiV.CominR.YuanM.AlarousuE.BuinA.et al. (2015). Low trap-state density and long carrier diffusion in organolead trihalide perovskite single crystals. Science347, 519. 10.1126/science.aaa2725
43
SmithI. C.HokeE. T.Solis-IbarraD.McGeheeM. D.KarunadasaH. I. (2014). A layered hybrid perovskite solar-cell absorber with enhanced moisture stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn.53, 11232–11235. 10.1002/anie.201406466
44
SordoS. D.AbbeneL.CaroliE.ManciniA. M.ZappettiniA.UbertiniP. (2009). Progress in the development of CdTe and CdZnTe semiconductor radiation detectors for astrophysical and medical applications. Sensors9, 3491–3526. 10.3390/s90503491
45
StoumposC. C.MalliakasC. D.KanatzidisM. G.et al. (2013b). Semiconducting tin and lead iodide perovskites with organic cations: phase transitions, high mobilities, and near-infrared photoluminescent properties. Inorg. Chem.52, 9019–9038. 10.1021/ic401215x
46
StoumposC. C.MalliakasC. D.PetersJ. A.LiuZ.SebastianM.ImJ.et al. (2013a). Crystal growth of the perovskite semiconductor CsPbBr3: a new material for high-energy radiation detection. Cryst. Growth Des.13, 2722–2727. 10.1021/cg400645t
47
TsaiH.NieW.BlanconJ. C.StoumposC. C.AsadpourR.HarutyunyanB.et al. (2016). High-efficiency two-dimensional Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite solar cells. Nature536, 312–316. 10.1038/nature18306
48
UchiyamaY.KoudaM.TanihataC.IsobeN.TakahashiT.MurakamiT.et al. (2001). Study of energy response of Gd2SiO5: Ce3+scintillator for the ASTRO-E hard X-ray detector. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.48, 379–384. 10.1109/23.940084
49
UmmadisinguA.SteierL.SeoJ. Y.MatsuiT.AbateA.TressW.et al. (2017). The effect of illumination on the formation of metal halide perovskite films. Nature545, 208–212. 10.1038/nature22072
50
VeldhuisS. A.BoixP. P.YantaraN.LiM.SumT. C.MathewsN.et al. (2016). Perovskite materials for light-emitting diodes and lasers. Adv. Mater.28, 6804–6834. 10.1002/adma.201600669
51
WangF.BaiS.TressW.HagfeldtA.GaoF.et al. (2018). Defects engineering for high-performance perovskite solar cells. NPJ Flexible Electronics2:22. 10.1038/s41528-018-0035-z
52
WangQ.ZhangX.JinZ.ZhangJ.GaoZ.LiY.et al. (2017). Energy-down-shift CsPbCl3:mn quantum dots for boosting the efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett.2, 1479–1486. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00375
53
WeiH.BaiS.TressW.HagfeldtA.GaoF. (2016). Sensitive X-ray detectors made of methylammonium lead tribromide perovskite single crystals. Nat. Photonics10, 333–339. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.41
54
WeiH.DeSantisD.WeiW.DengY.GuoD.SavenijeT. J.et al. (2017). Dopant compensation in alloyed CH3NH3PbBr3−xClx perovskite single crystals for gamma-ray spectroscopy. Nat. Mater.16, 826–833. 10.1038/nmat4927
55
WeiH.HuangJ. (2019). Halide lead perovskites for ionizing radiation detection. Nat. Commun.10:1066. 10.1038/s41467-019-08981-w
56
WeiW.ZhangY.XuQ.WeiH.FangY.WangQ.et al. (2017). Monolithic integration of hybrid perovskite single crystals with heterogenous substrate for highly sensitive X-ray imaging. Nat. Photonics11, 315–321. 10.1038/nphoton.2017.43
57
XuZ.LiuX.LiY.LiuX.YangT.JiC.et al. (2019). Exploring lead-free hybrid double perovskite crystals of (BA)2CsAgBiBr7 with large mobility-lifetime product toward X-ray detection. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn.58, 15757–15761. 10.1002/anie.201909815
58
YakuninS.DirinD. N.ShynkarenkoY.MoradV.CherniukhI.NazarenkoO.et al. (2016). Detection of gamma photons using solution-grown single crystals of hybrid lead halide perovskites. Nat. Photonics10, 585–589. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.139
59
YakuninS.SytnykM.KriegnerD.ShresthaS.RichterM.MattG. J.et al. (2015). Detection of X-ray photons by solution-processed lead halide perovskites. Nat. Photonics9, 444–449. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.82
60
YangB.YinL.NiuG.YuanJ. H.XueK. H.TanZ.YangB.et al. (2019). Lead-free halide Rb2CuBr3 as sensitive X-ray scintillator. Adv. Mater.31, 1904711. 10.1002/adma.201904711
61
YangW. S.NohJ. H.JeonN. J.KimY. C.RyuS.SeoJ.et al. (2015). High-performance photovoltaic perovskite layers fabricated through intramolecular exchange. Science348, 1234–1237. 10.1126/science.aaa9272
62
YangW. S.ParkB. W.JungE. H.JeonN. J.KimY. C.LeeD. U.et al. (2017). Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide–based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science356, 1376–1379. 10.1126/science.aan2301
63
YaoD.ZhangC.ZhangS.YangY.DuA.WaclawikE.YaoD.et al. (2019). 2D−3D mixed organic–inorganic perovskite layers for solar cells with enhanced efficiency and stability induced by n-propylammonium iodide additives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces11, 29753–29764. 10.1021/acsami.9b06305
64
YinL.WuH.PanW.YangB.LiP.LuoJ.et al. (2019). Controlled cooling for synthesis of Cs2AgBiBr6 single crystals and its application for X-ray detection. Adv. Optic. Mater.7:1900491. 10.1002/adom.201900491
65
YuanM.QuanL. N.CominR.WaltersG.SabatiniR.VoznyyO.et al. (2016). Perovskite energy funnels for efficient light-emitting diodes. Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 872–877. 10.1038/nnano.2016.110
66
ZhangH.LiuX.DongJ.YuH.ZhouC.ZhangB.et al. (2017). Centimeter-sized inorganic lead halide perovskite CsPbBr3 crystals grown by an improved solution method. Cryst. Growth Des.17, 6426–6431. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01086
67
ZhaoY.TanH.YuanH.YangZ.FanJ. Z.KimJ.et al. (2018). Perovskite seeding growth of formamidinium-lead-iodide-based perovskites for efficient and stable solar cells. Nat. Commun.9:1607. 10.1038/s41467-018-04029-7
68
ZhouC.LinH.TianY.YuanZ.ClarkR.ChenB.et al. (2018). Luminescent zero-dimensional organic metal halide hybrids with near-unity quantum efficiency. Chem. Sci.9, 586–593. 10.1039/c7sc04539e
69
ZhouC.TianY.WangM.RoseA.BesaraT.DoyleN. K.et al. (2017). Low-dimensional organic tin bromide perovskites and their photoinduced structural transformation. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn.56, 9018–9022. 10.1002/anie.201702825
70
ZhuangR.WangX.MaW.WuY.ChenX.TangL.et al. (2019). Highly sensitive X-ray detector made of layered perovskite-like (NH4)3Bi2I9 single crystal with anisotropic response. Nat. Photonics13, 602–608. 10.1038/s41566-019-0466-7
71
ZhumekenovA. A.SaidaminovM. I.HaqueM. A.AlarousuE.SarmahS. P.MuraliB.et al. (2016). Formamidinium lead halide perovskite crystals with unprecedented long carrier dynamics and diffusion length. ACS Energy Lett.1, 32–37. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00002
Summary
Keywords
perovskite, single crystal, synthesis strategies, radiation detection, stability
Citation
Pan W, Wei H and Yang B (2020) Development of Halide Perovskite Single Crystal for Radiation Detection Applications. Front. Chem. 8:268. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00268
Received
30 December 2019
Accepted
19 March 2020
Published
23 April 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Yang Bai, University of Queensland, Australia
Reviewed by
Sagar M. Jain, Swansea University, United Kingdom; Andrew Nattestad, University of Wollongong, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Pan, Wei and Yang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Haotong Wei hweichem@jlu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Inorganic Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.