Abstract
Aqueous non-lithium based rechargeable batteries are emerging as promising energy storage devices thanks to their attractive rate capacities, long-cycle life, high safety, low cost, environmental-friendliness, and easy assembly conditions. However, the aqueous electrolytes with high ionic conductivity are always restricted by their intrinsically narrow electrochemical window. Encouragingly, the highly concentrated “water-in-salt” (WIS) electrolytes can efficiently expand the stable operation window, which brings up a series of aqueous high-voltage rechargeable batteries. In the mini review, we summarize the latest progress and contributions of various aqueous electrolytes for non-lithium (Na+, K+, Zn2+, Mg2+, and Al3+) based rechargeable batteries, and give a brief exploration of the operating mechanisms of WIS electrolytes in expanding electrochemically stable windows. Challenges and prospects are also proposed for WIS electrolytes toward aqueous non-lithium rechargeable metal ion batteries.
Introduction
Recently, the safety issues and production costs of rechargeable batteries become the main factors restricting their commercial applications in portable electronic devices (PED), electrical vehicles (EV), and stationary electronic energy storage systems (EESs) (Wang et al., 2007; Suo et al., 2015; Lukatskaya et al., 2018). Thus, how to effectively select appropriate materials involved in batteries has become an important and challenging topic. As an important component of batteries, the electrolytes play a vital role in the superior electrochemical performance of batteries, and have attracted more and more attention in recent years (Kandhasamy et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2012; Suo et al., 2013). Although traditional organic electrolytes have exhibited appealing applications in rechargeable batteries, they inherently contain a large amount of expensive yet flammable organic solvents with certain levels of toxicity, which makes the device assembly conditions relatively harsh (Wang et al., 2012; Xu and Wang, 2016; Yang et al., 2019a). Consequently, aqueous electrolytes have been established as promising alternative candidates for advanced rechargeable batteries since their first application in lithium ion batteries (LIBs) (Li et al., 1994). The aqueous batteries display distinct merits, including low cost, high safety, high electronic conductivity, mild assembly environment, and so on (Wang et al., 2007; Baskar et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2019a). However, the electrochemical stability voltage window of aqueous batteries is as narrow as ~1.23 V, which seriously restricts the optimal choice of cathode and anode materials due to the existence of hydrogen and/or oxygen evolution reactions. This excludes most electrochemical couples that occur above the output voltage of 1.5 V, which limits the enhancement in energy density of full devices (Lu et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2019a; Liu et al., 2020).
Recently, highly concentrated “water-in-salt” (WIS) electrolytes, in which the dissolved salts far outnumbers the water molecules (salt/solvent ratio > 1 by volume or weight), have been reported to expand the stable voltage window up to ~3.0 V (Suo et al., 2016, 2017). In the WIS electrolytes, all water molecules participate in the ion solvation shells, and no “free” water remainders can be found. As a typical system, Suo et al. first developed a high concentration electrolyte with 21 m (mol kg−1) of lithium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) for aqueous rechargeable LIBs (the molar ratio of Li+ to H2O is 2.5) (Wang et al., 2015). However, the economic and environmental concerns, as well as the rarity and increasing consumption of Li resources, restrain the scalable applications of lithium-based electrochemical devices. As a consequence, the development of alternative aqueous rechargeable batteries based on some other earth-abundant elements turns out to be urgent and more meaningful. Therefore, the monovalent (Na+, K+) and/or multivalent (Zn2+, Mg2+, and Al3+) cation based aqueous secondary batteries have been intensively explored recently (Wessells et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2016; Suo et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020).
In this mini review, we mainly addressed the topic of the WIS electrolytes and their latest progress in various non-lithium aqueous rechargeable metal-ion batteries (ARMIBs). In the first section, we gave a brief exploration of the involved mechanism of WIS electrolytes in extending the electrochemical stability voltage window of devices. And then, we provided an extensive overview of the applications of WIS electrolytes in aqueous non-lithium secondary batteries, including aqueous sodium-ion batteries (ASIBs), aqueous potassium-ion batteries (APIBs), aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs), aqueous magnesium-ion batteries (AMIBs), and aqueous aluminum-ion batteries (AAIBs). Finally, we proposed the existing challenges and prospects for the future development of WIS electrolytes toward advanced non-lithium ARMIBs.
The Operating Mechanism of “WIS” Electrolytes in Extending the Electrochemical Window of Devices
It is well-known that free water fraction is one of the key factors affecting the electrochemical stability of electrolytes (McEldrew et al., 2018; Vatamanu and Borodin, 2018). In traditional “salt-in-water” (SIW) electrolytes, the water molecules enormously outnumber the salts, and are relatively free to form hydrogen bonding networks. Thus, a large amount of water molecules will separate or solubilize (or corrode) the electrode material (Dubouis et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019a). With the salt concentration increasing, the tighter solvation shell associated with WIS electrolytes can be formed. Meanwhile, the “freedom” water solvent molecules display a lower mobility. They turn out to be preferentially solvated by metal ions, and thus less available to separate salt anions. Accordingly, the water-water hydrogen bonds are replaced by water-ion-bonding interactions, enhancing the interactions between cations and anions, which can further widen the stable working windows of electrolytes (Azov et al., 2018).
It is also believed that the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer with a high salt concentration on the electrode surface can prevent water reduction, thus positively contributing to the wide electrochemical stability window. To be specific, the OH− generated during the hydrogen oxygen reaction in the first cycle will chemically react with anions (such as TFSI) to mainly form a stable SEI film, which further prevents water reduction, and enhances the oxidative stability of the electrode masteries (Coustan et al., 2018; Dubouis et al., 2018). A typical solvation structure for WIS electrolytes is schematically depicted in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1
It is well-known that it is an effective strategy to increase the energy density of batteries by raising the operating voltage (Xia et al., 2017; Manalastas et al., 2018). The voltage, according to the following Nernst equation, is highly dependent upon the half-cell potentials of both positive and negative electrodes.
where V0 is the standard half-cell reduction potential in respect to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature in kelvins, n is the stoichiometric number of electrons, F is Faraday's constant, Cred is the concentration of the reduced form, Cox is the concentration of the oxidized form, and a and b are exponential powers determined by the coefficients of Cred and Cox in the redox half-reaction, respectively.
The maximum cell potential (ΔV) is critically determined by the potential subtraction between positive and negative (V0+-V0−). The higher concentration of the oxidized form (Cox) establishes stronger reduction potentials, as shown in Equations 1, 2. The electrolyte concentration and SEI film can effectively control the electrolyte decomposition, which allows even higher-concentration redox ions to participate in electrochemical reactions within the broadened electrochemical voltage window. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations are reported as an effective way to calculate reduction potentials of the anions' salts (Suo et al., 2015; Dawut et al., 2019; Shin et al., 2019).
WIS Electrolytes for Non-Lithium Armibs
Considering some retrieved reviews about WIS electrolytes in lithium-based aqueous batteries (Wang et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2014), this mini-review will mainly focus on the latest progress in highly concentrated WIS electrolytes for non-lithium ARMIBs including ASIBs, APIBs, AZIBs, AMIBs, and AAIBs. The electrochemical properties of these batteries are systematically collected in Table 1.
Table 1
| Metal | Radius (nm) | Electrolytes | Voltage (V) | electrodes | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na | 0.102 | 35 m NaFSI | 2.6 | NaTi2(PO4)3 anode Na3(VOPO4)2F cathode | Kühnel et al., 2017 |
| 18.5 m Na(PTFSI)0.65(TFSI)0.14(OTf)0.213H2O | 2.7 | Vs Na+/Na | Zheng et al., 2019 | ||
| Na(PTFSI)0.65(TFSI)0.14(OTf)0.213H2O | 1.75 | Na3V2(PO4)2F3|NaTi2(PO4)3 full cell | |||
| 17m NaClO4 | 2.8 | Na2MnFe(CN)6| NaTi2(PO4)3 | Nakamoto et al., 2017 | ||
| 17m NaClO4 | 2.7 | Vs Na+/Na | Lee et al., 2019 | ||
| 17m NaClO4 | 1.8 | Na4Fe3(PO4)2(P2O7)|NaTi2(PO4)3 full-cell | |||
| 25m NaFSI + 10m NaTFSI | 1.9 | Na3(VOPO4)2F|NaTi2(PO4)3 full-cell | Reber et al., 2019 | ||
| 9 m NaOTf + 22 m TEAOTf | 3.3 | Vs Ag/AgCl | Jiang et al., 2019a | ||
| K | 0.138 | 27.7 m K(PTFSI)0.12(TFSI)0.08(OTf)0.82H2O | 2.5 | vs K+/K | Zheng et al., 2019 |
| 30 m KAc | 3.2 | KTi2(PO4)3 as anode | Leonard et al., 2018 | ||
| 22 m KCF3SO3 | 3.0 | vs Ag/AgCl | Jiang et al., 2019b | ||
| 22 m KCF3SO3 | 2.6 | KFeMnHCF-3565|PTCDI full cells | |||
| 30 m KFSI | 3.97 | vs. Hg/Hg2Cl2) | Chen et al., 2020 | ||
| Zn | 0.074 | 21 m LiTFSI +0.5 m ZnSO4 | 1.8 | LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 as cathode | Zhao et al., 2016 |
| 21 m LiTFSI+ 1 m Zn(CF3SO3)2 | 1.4 | V2O5 as anode | Hu et al., 2017 | ||
| 2.4 m KOH+1.0 m H2SO4 acid-alkaline dual electrolyte | 2.44 | Zn/Zn(OH)2−anode+ Mn2+/MnO2 as cathode | Liu et al., 2020 | ||
| Al | 0.0535 | 5 m Al(CF3SO3)3 | 2.65 | PBA-type FeFe(CN)6 as cathode | Zhou et al., 2019 |
| Mg | 0.072 | 1 m MgSO4 | 1.5 | PBN-Na1.4Ni1.3Fe(CN)65H2O| polyimide full cells | Xia et al., 2017 |
| 4 m Mg(TFSI)2 | 1.9 | Li3V2(PO4)3|poly pyromellitic dianhydride | Wang et al., 2017 |
The main electrochemical properties for WIS-based aqueous non-lithium batteries.
FSI, bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide; TFSI, bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide; OTf, trifluoromethane sulfonate; PTFSI, N(SO2CF3)(SO2C2F5); TEA, tetraethylammonium; TFSI, bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide; PBN, Prussian blue; PTCDI, 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic diimide.
It is well-known that electrolytes as ionic transport intermediates, with their inherent ionic conductivity, mobility, interfacial characteristics, and other properties, play a critical role in enhancing the cycle performances. Designing and optimizing a functional electrolyte with a stable electrode/electrolyte interfaces has to be considered as an essential way to achieve a superior electrochemical performance in aqueous batteries. The typical design strategies are optimized by varying the electrolyte components, including salts and additives (Peng et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2020).
The choice of salts significantly affects the electrochemical stability of the electrolytes, as well as their ionic conductivity and thermal stability. The salt anions in the aqueous WIS electrolytes can be commonly divided into inorganic (Cl−, , and ) and organic (CF3, FSI−, TFSI−, BETI−, and PTFSI−) ones (Hong et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2020). Inorganic salts are likely to be considered due to their low cost and high ionic conductivity. For instance, the fewer side reactions and low oxidation of Cl− make it suitable for aqueous electrolytes (Zhang et al., 2018). In the case of , the low cost, good compatibility, and exceptional stability make it more attractive; however, some by-products produced by over cycling still limits its practical application (Zhao et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2019b). Another anion is , which has strong oxidability, lowering the potential for explosive risks and high toxicity (Lee et al., 2019). The bulky organic anions (i.e., CF3, FSI−, TFSI−, BETI−, and PTFSI−) in aqueous electrolytes can reduce the solvation effect by occupying a large space. These anions show low ionic conductivity and corrosion issues (Yamada et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2019a; Pan et al., 2019).
ASIBS
Sodium, as one an alkali metal, is closely located with lithium in the periodic table and has a relatively low electrochemical potential (−2.71 V vs. SHE). Typically, SIBs share many chemical properties with LIBs (Kim et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013; Boyd and Augustyn, 2018; Zheng et al., 2019). The high concentrated WIS electrolytes produce ASIBs with better cycling stability. However, the easy crystallization of highly concentrated electrolytes at room temperature will seriously limit their practical application, and even damage the batteries (Wu et al., 2015; Reber et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020). Currently, the hydrate melts or bisalt, especially the adoption of asymmetric imide anions (such as FTFSI and PTFSI), are proved to be effective for reducing the viscosity and density as well as restraining crystallization by breaking the water structure and/or changing the probability of solvation structures with ion aggregations (Marcus, 2009; Brini et al., 2017; Suo et al., 2017), which thus results in the high solubility of salt anions (Suo et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2019).
As reported in previous works, the commonly used salts in electrolytes of ASIBs are NaClO4, NaFSI, NaCF3SO3 (NaOTf), and NaTFSI due to their unique properties. Suo et al. first reported a Na+-conducting SEI layer on the surface of the NaTi2(PO4)3 anode in an electrolyte of 9.26 m sodium trifluoromethane sulfonate (NaCF3SO3 or NaOTf), which expands the electrochemical stability window of NaTi2(PO4)3 up to 2.5 V (vs. Na+/Na) (Suo et al., 2017). Kühnel and co-workers obtained an ultra-high-concentration (up to 37 M) sodium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (NaFSI) in water by rapid solidification of the entire supersaturated solution, offering a stable electrochemical window of 2.6 V. Strikingly, an aqueous NaTi2(PO4)3//Na3(VOPO4)2F sodium-ion battery with an electrolyte of 35 m NaFSI shows electrochemically reversible behaviors within an electrochemical window over 2.0 V (Kühnel et al., 2017). The NaFSI electrolytes with different concentrations are also shown to effectively broaden the voltage windows of ASIBs (Zheng et al., 2019). Another well-used electrolyte in ASIBs is NaClO4 solution. When its molality increases to 17 m, a stable electrochemical potential window of ~2.8 V can be realized (Nakamoto et al., 2017, 2018; Lee et al., 2019). However, the potential explosive risk and high toxicity may hinder the extensive use of NaClO4. Battaglia et al. explored a NaTi2(PO4)3//Na3(VOPO4)2F sodium-ion battery by employing the mixed NaFSI/NaFTFSI electrolyte (25 m NaFSI and 10 m NaFTFSI). The unique device demonstrates superb electrochemical performance in terms of cycling stability, reversible capacity, and energy density within a wide operating temperature range from −10 to 30°C, benefiting from the positive role of the mixed electrolyte (Reber et al., 2019). A new type of mixed WIS electrolytes containing inert cations (TEA+) is prepared by dissolving sodium trifluoromethanesulfonate (NaOTf) and tetraethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate (TEAOTf) in water. When the total salt concentration is up to 31 m (9 m NaOTf and 22 m TEAOTf), the unique NaOTf/TEAOTf electrolyte is endowed with a wide voltage window of ~3.3 V, and suppresses the dissolution of the positive transition metal as well (Jiang et al., 2019a).
APIBS
Potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) are also considered to be a promising energy storage system due to their abundant potassium resources (Su et al., 2016; Eftekhari et al., 2017). Generally, potassium owns lower standard redox potential than its counterparts of Na and Li, which will guarantee PIBs with a potentially higher cell voltage. However, the higher ionization potential and larger ionic radius of K itself have limited the choice of electrode materials for advanced APIBs (Suo et al., 2017; Hwang et al., 2018). Thanks to the smaller Stokes radius of solvated K+ owing to its weak Lewis acidity, and the low interfacial reaction resistance due to the small desolvation activation energy, the K-containing electrolytes always display higher conductivity than its Li/Na counterparts (Komaba et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020). Meanwhile, the weak oxidation resistance of electrolytes and the insufficient passivation on the surface of negative electrodes leads to modest reversible capacities, especially at the initial cycle, or in the high-voltage (>4.0 V) operation windows, which limits the huge development of APIBs (Hosaka et al., 2018). Therefore, it is essential to fit the high energy APIBs to purposefully explore suitable electrolytes.
Leonard and co-workers first reported the aqueous electrolyte of 30 m potassium acetate (KAc) for APIBs (Leonard et al., 2018). With the electrolyte, the KTi2(PO4)3 (KTP) anode displays good reversible behaviors within an extended electrochemical window from −1.7 to 1.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). Compared to the KAc and LiTFSI-based electrolytes with the same concentration, the bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide(KFSI)-based electrolytes exhibit higher conductivity (Chen et al., 2020). The electrolyte of 30 m KFSI also displays an electrochemical stability window from −1.55 to 2.42 V (vs. Hg/Hg2Cl2), which enables the b-perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic dianhydride (b-PTCDA), and even b-PTCDA-based full batteries to stably operate in such high-concentration electrolytes without hydrogen evolution and material dissolution (Chen et al., 2020). Jiang et al. also investigated an aqueous 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic diimide (anode)//K1.85Fe0.33Mn0.67[Fe(CN)6]0.98·0.77H2O (cathode) full device with 20 m KCF3SO3 (KOTf) WIS electrolyte, and the full battery exhibits an unprecedented performance in terms of reversible capacities and rate behaviors (Jiang et al., 2019b).
The asymmetric hydrate melts with an optimized eutectic system have been reported as a stable aqueous electrolyte with good fluidity and reduced viscosity/density, in which all water molecules participate in Li+ hydration shells (Yamada et al., 2016). With the introduced stable asymmetric anion (i.e., PTFSI−), the K(PTFSI)0.12(TFSI)0.08(OTf)0.8·2H2O as the alkali melts exhibits excellent water solubility and an expanded operating window of ~2.5 V (~2.14–4.65 V vs. K+/K), but does not suffer from the vulnerable S-F bond. Moreover, the ionic conductivity of the K(PTFSI)0.12(TFSI)0.08(OTf)0.82H2O is maintained at ~34.6 mS cm−1, much higher than other typical non-aqueous electrolytes (~10 mS cm−1) (Zheng et al., 2019).
AZIBS
Recently, AZIBs, due to their remarkable thermal stability, high theoretical specific capacity (~820 mAh g−1), intrinsic safety, and low cost of the Zn metal, are considered to be the most promising alternative to LIBs. Moreover, the metallic Zn is stable, and can be directly utilized as an electrochemically reversible anode in aqueous electrolytes (Zhang, 1996; Li et al., 2019). However, its extensive applications are still limited by suitable aqueous electrolytes with excellent thermal properties and safety. Previous works have shown that the alkaline aqueous electrolytes result in the formation of zinc dendrite and the by-product of ZnO, causing a poor cycle capacity and low CE values (Zhang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2018a). Similarly, the Zn salts-based neutral or mildly acidic electrolytes with high concentrations are a very effective way to address these issues.
Typically, ZnSO4 and Zn(CF3SO3)2 solutions are commonly used electrolytes for AZIBs because of their excellent stability and compatibility (Song et al., 2018). Zhao et al. assembled a Zn//LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 aqueous hybrid-ion battery with 0.5 m ZnSO4 and 21 m LiTFSI as the WIS electrolyte. The unique device provides a high energy density of ~183 Wh kg−1 and a high operating voltage exceeding 1.8 V (Zhao et al., 2016). However, the ZnSO4 electrolyte for AZIBs always suffers from its intrinsically limited solubility and lower Zn stripping/plating efficiency. In contrast, the Zn(CF3SO3)2 electrolyte exhibits smaller polarization and higher CE values, which makes it suitable for wide application in aqueous ZIBs (Huang et al., 2019b; Xie et al., 2020). Mai's group designed a novel Zn//V2O5 aqueous hybrid-ion battery with the WIS electrolyte of 1 m Zn(CF3SO3)2 and 21 m LiTFSI. Compared to that with the Zn(CF3SO3)2 (1 m), the Zn//V2O5 battery with the WIS-electrolyte (21 m LiTFSI and 1 m Zn(CF3SO3)2) displayed a more stable charge/discharge plateau and cycling performance (Hu et al., 2017). Furthermore, owing to the large-size TFSI− anions, the Zn(TFSI)2, as a novel organic zinc salt can effectively reduce the solvation effect. Wang's group developed a WIS electrolyte of 1 m Zn(TFSI)2 + 20 m LiTFSI, which is capable of retaining the water in an open atmosphere. It effectively promotes the dendrite-free plating/stripping of metallic Zn with nearly 100% CE and brings unprecedented reversibility to the aqueous ZIBs with either LiMn2O4 or O2 cathodes (Wang et al., 2018a). Additionally, a new low-cost WIS electrolyte of 30 m ZnCl2 can deliver a wide electrochemical window of 2.3 V due to its fewer side reactions and low oxidative Cl− (Zhang et al., 2018). In the symmetric Zn||Zn cell with a 30 m ZnCl2 electrolyte, the Zn electrode renders a high CE of 95.4% and a high stable galvanostatic charge-discharge profile of over 600 h without any significant overpotential fluctuation (Zhang et al., 2018).
AMIBS
Multivalent ions, as good transporters, can carry more electrons than monovalent ions. Besides the Zn2+, another bivalent metal ion of Mg2+ with low reduction potential (−2.37 V) is also considered as a predominant charge carrier for AMIBs due to the high volumetric specific capacity of Mg (~3833 mAh L−1) and the total lakc of dendrite growth (Rasul et al., 2012; Song et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2016). The current development and practical applications of the electrolytes for AMIBs are limited by the corrosion of the electrolytes (Wang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2020). The electrochemical Mg dissolution occurs at a high overpotential which restrains the selection of solvents (Hebié et al., 2017). Consequently, the commonly used anions (Cl−, , , CF3) in other ARMIBs cannot be directly applied to AMIBs. Moreover, the high charge density of multivalent ions will induce strong coulombic interactions with both the lattice of electrolyte solvents and electrode materials, which is an adverse factor for improving electrochemical performance (Lapidus et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2018b). So far, the AMIBs are still in its infancy; only a few possible materials based on WIS electrolytes show reversible performance toward AMIBs.
Moreover, Mg(TFSI)2, as a neutral molecule, is completely non-corrosive, safe, and green, and can be anticipated for AMIBs application (Yoo et al., 2013). Wang et al. fabricated a poly pyromellitic dianhydride//Li3V2(PO4)3 device by using 4 m Mg(TFSI)2 as the electrolyte. The full cell exhibits superior electrochemical properties including an excellent rate capability, high power density, and high capacity retention in an electrochemical window of 1.9 V (Wang et al., 2017).
AAIBS
Aluminum is the first abundant metal element in the earth's crust, which has been investigated widely as the anode material for AAIBs (Wang et al., 2016). Moreover, the ion radius of Al3+ (0.054 nm) is much smaller than Li+ (0.076 nm), which ensures the rapid insertion/extraction of Al3+ during the charge/discharge process (Rudd and Gibbons, 1994; Li et al., 2007; Das et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019b). Furthermore, the Al anode possesses a large gravimetric/volumetric capacity (~2,980 mAh g−1/~8,046 mAh cm−3), due to its unique three-electron transfer capability. However, the low ionic conductivity, corrosion with low concentration electrolytes, and dendrites growth still limits the electrochemical stability of electrolytes, thereby limiting its large-scale energy applications (Liu et al., 2012; Nakayama et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2018). So, the key for developing AAIBs is to exploit WIS electrolytes toward high-performance electrodes, which can enable the dissolution of dendrites, thereby significantly improve the cycling stability.
AlCl3, due to the ultra-low cost and safety, is widely used as the electrolytes for AAIBs. Pan et al. reported a high-concentration aqueous AlCl3 solution (3.382 m) as the electrolyte for a novel Al/AlCl3/graphite aqueous battery, which can stably operate within an electrochemical stability window of ~4 V, and exhibit a large capacity of ~165 at 500 mA g−1 along with a high CE of 95% over 1,000 cycles (Pan et al., 2019). Additionally, the Al(OTf)3 is another type of electrolyte with a noncorrosive property, which makes it more favorable than corrosive AlCl3 when applied in AAIBs (Das et al., 2017). Chen's group introduced the electrolyte of 5 m Al(OTf)3 for electrochemical evaluation of the Prussian Blue Analogs-type FeFe(CN)6 (FF-PBA) cathode. Appealingly, with the electrolyte, the FF-PBA shows an extraordinarily high initial discharge capacity of ~116 mAh g−1 and long cycle life with a capacity fading of 0.39% per cycle in the expanded operation window of 2.65 V (Zhou et al., 2019). Until now, there are few other WIS electrolytes reported for AAIBs.
Conclusion
Electrolytes, as ionic transport intermediates with inherent ionic conductivity, mobility, interfacial characteristics, and other properties, play a critical role in enhancing the cycle performances, rate capacity, and safety of batteries. WIS electrolytes with highly concentrated salt solutions specifically can expand electrochemical potential windows of aqueous devices up to about 3 V and result in low solvent (water molecules) activities and high chemical stabilities (restraining side reactions). Moreover, the formation of stable SEI film also endows the cells with a high energy density and excellent cycling stability. This mini review mainly focuses on the WIS electrolytes for ARMIBs and summarizes the recent investigation of WIS electrolytes in non-lithium monovalent (Na, K) and multivalent (Zn, Mg, Al) ion batteries.
However, research based on the WIS electrolytes is still at the primary stage, according to the achievements reported so far; the challenges and prospects for the future development of WIS electrolytes toward non-lithium ARMIBs are proposed as follows. First, the scientific foundation for the highly concentrated WIS electrolytes will render some novel yet unknown concepts, which may be in conflict with current classic theories, and should be further unveiled with the elegant combination of in/ex-situ spectroscopic techniques and theoretical simulation/calculation. For instance, an in-depth understanding of intrinsic ionic transport and functional SEI formation mechanisms in the WIS electrolyte, which are distinct from the conventional SIW systems, should be comprehensively conducted. Second, further exploration of appropriate salts, particularly with high thermodynamic stability, super ionic conductivity, and good compatibility with both electrodes at a low cost, should also be taken into account for high-performance WIS electrolytes, considering their practical commercial applications. Third, the balance between high-concentration electrolytes and low viscosity and crystallization also needs to be solved.
Despite facing huge difficulties and challenges, we firmly believe that aqueous rechargeable batteries based on WIS electrolytes will receive rapid and sustained development in the near future. This will result in new avenues for the future energy storage landscape.
Statements
Author contributions
YW: formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, and writing—review & editing. XM: investigation. JS: formal analysis and writing—review & editing. YL: visualization and software. LH: formal analysis, investigation, conceptualization, writing—review & editing, and funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51772131, 51802119), Natural Science Doctoral Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019BEM038, ZR2019BB057), and Natural Science Doctoral Foundation of the University of Jinan (XBS1830).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AzovV. A.EgorovaK. S.SeitkalievaM. M.KashinA. S.AnanikovV. P. (2018). Solvent-in-salt systems for design of new materials in chemistry, biology and energy research. Chem. Soc. Re.47, 1250–1284. 10.1039/c7cs00547d
2
BaskarS.MeyrickD.Kalai SelvanR.MinakshiM. (2014). Facile and large scale combustion synthesis of alpha-CoMoO4: Mimics the redox behavior of a battery in aqueous hybrid device. Chem. Eng. J.253, 502–507. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.068
3
BoydS.AugustynV. (2018). Transition metal oxides for aqueous sodium-ion electrochemical energy storage. Inorg. Chem. Front.5, 999–1015. 10.1039/c8qi00148k
4
BriniE.FennellC. J.Fernandez-SerraM.Hribar-LeeB.LukšičM.DillK. A. (2017). How water's properties are encoded in its molecular structure and energies. Chem. Rev.117, 12385–12414. 10.1021/acs.~chemrev.7b00259.
5
ChenH.ZhangZ. Y.WeiZ. X.ChenG.YangX.WangC. Z.et al. (2020). Use of a water-in-salt electrolyte to avoid organic material dissolution and enhance the kinetics of aqueous potassium ion batteries. Sustain. Energy Fuels4, 128–131. 10.1039/c9se00545e
6
CoustanL.ZaghibK.BélangerD. (2018). New insight in the electrochemical behaviour of stainless steel electrode in water-in-salt electrolyte. J. Power Sources399, 299–303. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.114
7
DasS. K.MahapatraS.LahanH. (2017). Aluminium-ion batteries: developments and challenges. J. Mater. Chem. A5, 6347–6367. 10.1039/c7ta00228a
8
DawutG.LuY.MiaoL. C.ChenJ. (2019). High-performance rechargeable aqueous zn-ion batteries with poly(benzoquinonyl sulfide) cathode. Inorg. Chem. Front.5, 1391–1396. 10.1039/c8qI00197a
9
DubouisN.LemaireP.MirvauxB.SalagerE.DeschampsM.GrimaudA. (2018). The role of hydrogen evolution reaction on the solid electrolyte interphase formation mechanism for water-in-salt electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci.11, 3491–3499. 10.1039/c8ee02456a
10
EftekhariA.JianZ. L.JiX. (2017). Potassium secondary batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces9, 4404–4419. 10.1021/acsami.6b07989
11
HebiéS.NgoH. P. K.LeprêtreJ. C.IojoiuC.CointeauxL.BerthelotR.et al. (2017). Electrolyte based on easily synthesized, low cost triphenolate-borohydride salt for high performance Mg(TFSI)2-glyme rechargeable magnesium batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces9, 28377–28385. 10.1021/acsami.7b06022
12
HongS. Y.KimY.ParkY.ChoiA.ChoiN.LeeK. T. (2013). Charge carriers in rechargeable batteries: Na ions vs. Li ions. Energy Environ. Sci.6, 2067–2081. 10.1039/c3ee40811f
13
HosakaT.KubotaK.KojimaH.KomabaS. (2018). Highly concentrated electrolyte solutions for 4 V class potassium-ion batteries. Chem. Comm.54, 8387–8390. 10.1039/c8cc04433c
14
HuP.YanM. Y.ZhuT.WangX. P.WeiX. J.LiJ. T.et al. (2017). Zn/V2O5 Aqueous hybrid-ion battery with high voltage platform and long cycle life. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces9, 42717–42722. 10.1021/acsami.7b13110
15
HuangJ. H.GuoZ. W.MaY. Y.BinD.WangY. G.XiaY. G. (2019a). Recent progress of rechargeable batteries using mild aqueous electrolytes. Small Methods3:1800272. 10.1002/smtd.201800272
16
HuangS.ZhuJ. C.TianJ. L.NiuZ. Q. (2019b). Recent progress in the electrolytes of aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Chem. Eur. J.25, 1–16. 10.1002/chem.201902660
17
HwangJ.-Y.MyungS.-T.SunY.-K. (2018). Recent progress in rechargeable potassium batteries. Adv. Fun. Mater.28:1802938. 10.1002/adfm.201802938
18
JiangL. W.LiuL. L.YueJ. M.ZhangQ. Q.ZhouA. X.BorodinO.et al. (2019a). High-voltage aqueous Na-ion battery enabled by inert-cation-assisted water-in-salt electrolyte. Adv. Mater.32:1904427. 10.1002/adma.201904427
19
JiangL. W.LuY. X.ZhaoC. L.LiuL. L.ZhangJ. N.ZhangQ. Q.et al. (2019b). Building aqueous K-ion batteries for energy storage. Nat. Energy4, 495–503. 10.1038/s41560-019-0388-0
20
KandhasamyS.PandeyA.MinakshiM. (2012). Polyvinylpyrrolidone assisted sol-gel route LiCo1/3Mn1/3Ni1/3PO4 composite cathode for aqueous rechargeable battery. Electrochim. Acta60, 170–176. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.028
21
KimH.HongJ.ParkK.-Y.KimH.KimS.-W.KangK. (2014). Aqueous rechargeable Li and Na ion batteries. Chem. Rev.114, 11788–11827. 10.1021/cr500232y
22
KimH.KimJ. C.BianchiniM.SeoD.-H.Rodriguez-GarciaJ.CederG. (2017). Recent progress and perspective in electrode materials for K-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater.8:1702384. 10.1002/aenm.201702384
23
KimS.-W.SeoD.-H.MaX. H.CederG.KangK. (2012). Electrode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries: potential alternatives to current lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater.2, 710–721. 10.1002/aenm.201200026
24
KomabaS.HasegawaT.DahbiM.KubotaK. (2015). Potassium intercalation into graphite to realize high-voltage/high-power potassium-ion batteries and potassium-ion capacitors. Electrochem. Commun.60, 172–175. 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.09.002
25
KühnelR. S.ReberD.BattagliaC. (2017). A high-voltage aqueous electrolyte for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett.2, 2005–2006. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00623
26
LapidusS. H.RajputN. N.QuX.ChapmanK. W.PerssonK. A.ChupasP. J. (2014). Solvation structure and energetics of electrolytes for multivalent energy storage. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 21941–21945. 10.1039/c4cp03015j
27
LeeM. H.KimS. J.ChangD. H.KimJ. S.MoonS.OhK.et al. (2019). Toward a low-cost high-voltage sodium aqueous rechargeable battery. Mater. Today29, 26–36. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.02.004
28
LeonardD. P.WeiZ. X.ChenG.DuF.JiX. L. (2018). Water-in-salt electrolyte for potassium-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett.3, 373–374. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00009
29
LiC. S.JiW. Q.ChenJ.TaoZ. L. (2007). Metallic aluminum nanorods: synthesis via vapor-deposition and applications in Al/air batteries. Chem. Mater.19, 5812–5814. 10.1021/cm7018795
30
LiW.DahnJ. R.WainwrightD. (1994). Rechargeable lithium batteries with aqueous electrolytes. Science264, 1115–1118. 10.1126/science.264.5162.1115
31
LiX. L.MaL. T.ZhaoY. W.YangQ.WangD. H.HuangZ. D.et al. (2019). Hydrated hybrid vanadium oxide nanowires as the superior cathode for aqueous Zn battery. Mater. Today Energy14:100361. 10.1016/j.mtener.2019.100361
32
LiZ.YoungD.XiangK.CarterW. C.ChiangY.-M. (2013). Towards high power high energy aqueous sodium-ion batteries: the NaTi2(PO4)3/Na0.44MnO2 System. Adv. Energy Mater.3, 290–294. 10.1002/aenm.201200598
33
LiuC.ChiX. W.HanQ.LiuY. (2020). A high energy density aqueous battery achieved by dual dissolution/deposition reactions separated in acid-alkaline electrolyte. Adv. Energy Mater.10:1903589. 10.1002/aenm.201903589
34
LiuS.HuJ. J.YanN. F.PanG. L.LiG. R.GaoX. P. (2012). Aluminum storage behavior of anatase TiO2 nanotube arrays in aqueous solution for aluminum ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci.5, 9743–9746. 10.1039/c2ee22987k
35
LuY. H.GoodenoughJ. B.KimY. (2011). Aqueous cathode for next-generation alkali-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 5756–5759. 10.1021/ja201118f
36
LukatskayaM. R.FeldblyumJ. I.MackanicD. G.LisselF.MichelsD. L.CuiY.et al. (2018). Concentrated mixed cation acetate water-in-salt solutions as green and low-cost high voltage electrolytes for aqueous batteries. Energy Environ. Sci.11, 2876–2883. 10.1039/c8ee00833g
37
ManalastasW. J.KumarS.VermaV.ZhangL. P.YuanD.SrinivasanM. (2018). Water in rechargeable multivalent-ion batteries: an electrochemical Pandora's box. ChemSusChem.12, 379–396. 10.1002/cssc.201801523
38
MarcusY. (2009). Effect of ions on the structure of water: structure makingand breaking, Chem. Rev.109, 1346–1370. 10.1021/acsami.6b07989
39
McEldrewM.GoodwinZ. A. H.KornyshevA. A.BazantM. Z. (2018). Theory of the double layer in water-in-salt electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.9, 5840–5846. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02543
40
NakamotoK.SakamotoR.ItoM.KitajouA.OkadaS. (2017). Effect of concentrated electrolyte on aqueous sodium-ion battery with sodium manganese hexacyanoferrate cathode. Electrochem.85, 179–185. 10.5796/electrochemistry.85.179
41
NakamotoK.SakamotoR.SawadaY. K.ItoM.OkadaS. (2018). Over 2 V aqueous sodium-ion battery with prussian blue-type electrodes. Small Methods3:1800220. 10.1002/smtd.201800220
42
NakayamaY.SendaY.KawasakiH.KoshitaniN.HosoiS.KudoY.et al. (2015). Sulfone-based electrolytes for aluminium rechargeable batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.17, 5758–5766. 10.1039/c4cp02183e
43
PanW. D.WangY. F.ZhangY. G.KwokH. Y. H.WuM. Y.ZhaoX. L.et al. (2019). A low-cost and dendrite-free rechargeable aluminium-ion battery with superior performance. J. Mater. Chem. A7, 17420–17425. 10.1039/c9ta05207k
44
PengN.ZhaoN.ZhangZ. G.WanH.LinH.LiuM.et al. (2017). Stabilizing Li/electrolyte interface with a transplantable protective layer based on nanoscale LiF domains. Nano Energy39, 662–672. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.052
45
RasulS.SuzukiS.YamaguchiS.MiyayamaM. (2012). High capacity positive electrodes for secondary Mg-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta82, 243–249. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.095
46
ReberD.KühnelR. S.BattagliaC. (2019). Suppressing crystallization of water-in-salt electrolytes by asymmetric anions wnables low-temperature peration of high-voltage aqueous batteries. ACS Materials Lett.1, 44–51. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00043
47
RuddE. J.GibbonsD. W. (1994). High energy density aluminum/oxygen cell. J. Power Sources47, 329–340. 10.1016/0378-7753(94)87012-8
48
ShinJ.ChoiD. S.LeeH. J.JungY. S.ChoiJ. W. (2019). Hydrated intercalation for high-performance aqueous zinc ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater.9:1900083. 10.1002/aenm.201900083
49
SongJ.NokedM.GilletteE.DuayJ.RubloffG.LeeS. B. (2015). Activation of a MnO2 cathode by water-stimulated Mg2+ insertion for a magnesium ion battery. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.17, 5256–5264. 10.1039/c4cp05591h
50
SongM.TanH.ChaoD. L.FanH. J. (2018). Recent advances in Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Fun. Mater.28:1802564. 10.1002/adfm.201802564
51
SuD. W.McDonangA.QiaoS.-, Z.WangG. X. (2016). High-capacity aqueous potassium-ion batteries for large-scale energy storage. Adv. Mater.29:1604007. 10.1002/adma.201604007
52
SunX. Q.DuffortV.MehdiB. L.BrowningN. D.NazarL. F. (2016). Investigation of the mechanism of Mg insertion in birnessite in nonaqueous and aqueous rechargeable Mg-ion batteries. Chem. Mater.28, 534–542. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03983
53
SuoL. M.BorodinO.GaoT.OlguinM.HoJ.FanX. L.et al. (2015). Water-in-salt electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries. Science350, 938–943. 10.1126/science.aab1595
54
SuoL. M.BorodinO.SunW.FanX. L.YangC. Y.WangF.et al. (2016). Advanced high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion battery enabled by water-in-bisalt electrolyte. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 7136–7141. 10.1002/ange.201602397
55
SuoL. M.BorodinOWangY. S.RongX. H.SunW.FanX. L.et al. (2017). Water-in-salt electrolyte makes aqueous sodium-ion battery safe, green, and long-lasting. Adv. Energy Mater.7:1701189. 10.1002/aenm.201701189
56
SuoL. M.HuY. S.LiH.ArmandM.ChenL. Q. (2013). A new class of solvent-in-salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries. Nat. Commun.4:1481. 10.1038/ncomms2513
57
VatamanuJ.BorodinO. (2018). Ramifications of water-in-salt interfacial structure at charged electrodes for electrolyte electrochemical stability. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.8, 4362–4367. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01879
58
WangF.BorodinO.GaoT.FanX. L.SunW.HanF. D.et al. (2018a). Highly reversible zinc metal anode for aqueous batteries. Nat. Mater.17, 543–549. 10.1038/s41563-018-0063-z
59
WangF.FanX. L.GaoT.SunW.MaZ. H.YangC. Y.et al. (2017). High-voltage aqueous magnesium ion batteries. ACS Cent. Sci.3, 1121–1128. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00361
60
WangF. X.YuF.WangX. W.ChangZ.FuL. J.ZhuY. S.et al. (2016). Aqueous rechargeable zinc/aluminum ion battery with good cycling performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces8, 9022–9029. 10.1021/acsami.5b06142
61
WangG.FuL.ZhaoN.YangL.WuY.WuH. (2007). An aqueous rechargeable lithium battery with good cycling performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.46, 295–297. 10.1002/anie.200603699
62
WangH.WangM.TangY. B. (2018b). A novel zinc-ion hybrid supercapacitor for long-life and low-cost energy storage applications. Energy Storage Mater.13, 1–7. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.12.022
63
WangP. P.ChenZ.WangH.JiZ. Y.FengY. P.WangJ. Q.et al. (2020). A high performance flexible aqueous Al ion rechargeable battery with long cycle life. Energy Storage Mater.25, 426–435. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.038
64
WangY. G.YiJ.XiaY. G. (2012). Rencent progress in aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater.2, 830–840. 10.1002/aenm.201200065
65
WangY. S.LiuJ.LeeB.QiaoR. M.YangZ. Z.XuS. Y.et al. (2015). Ti-substituted tunnel-type Na0.44MnO2 oxide as a negative electrode for aqueous sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 6. 1–10. 10.1038/ncomms7401
66
WessellsC. D.PeddadaS. V.HugginsR. A.CuiY. (2011). Nickel hexacyanoferrate nanoparticle electrodes for aqueous sodium and potassium ion batteries. Nano Lett.11, 5421–5425. 10.1021/nl203193q
67
WuX. Y.LuoY.SunM. Y.QianJ. F.CaoY. L.AiX. P.et al. (2015). Low-defect Prussian blue nanocubes as high capacity and long life cathodes for aqueous Na-ion batteries. Nano Energy13, 117–124. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.006
68
XiaL.YuL. P.HuD.ChenG. Z. (2017). Electrolytes for electrochemical energy storage. Mater. Chem. Front.1, 584–618. 10.1039/c6qm00169f
69
XieX. S.LiangS. Q.GaoJ. W.GuoS.GuoJ. B.WangC.et al. (2020). Manipulating the ion-transfer kinetics and interface stability for high-performance zinc metal anodes. Energy Environ. Sci.13, 503–510. 10.1039/C9EE03545a
70
XuC. J.ChenY. Y.ShiS.LiJ.KangF. Y.SuD. S. (2015). Secondary batteries with multivalent ions for energy storage. Sci. Rep.5:14120. 10.1038/srep14120
71
XuK.WangC. S. (2016). Batteries: widening voltage windows. Nat. Energy1:16161. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.161
72
YamadaY.UsuiK.SodeyamaK.KoS.TateyamaY.YamadaA. (2016). Hydrate-melt electrolytes for high-energy-density aqueous batteries. Nat. Energy.1:16129. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.129
73
YanJ.WangJ.LiuH.BakenovZ.GosselinkD.ChenP. (2012). Rechargeable hybrid aqueous batteries. J. Power Sources216, 222–226. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.063
74
YangC.ChenJ.JiX.PollardT. P.LuX. J.SunC. J.et al. (2019a). Aqueous Li-ion battery enabled by halogen conversion–intercalation chemistry in graphite. Nature569, 245–250. 10.1038/s41586-019-1175-6
75
YangH. C.LiH. C.LiJ.SunZ. H.HeK.ChengH.-M.et al. (2019b). The rechargeable aluminum battery: opportunities and challenges. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.58, 11978–11996. 10.1002/anie.201814031
76
YooH. D.ShterenbergI.GoferY.GershinskyG.PourN.AurbachD. (2013). Mg rechargeable batteries: an on-going challenge. Energy Environ. Sci.6:2265. 10.1039/c3ee40871j
77
ZhangC.HoloubekJ.WuX. Y.DaniyarA.ZhuL. D.ChenC.et al. (2018). ZnCl2 water-in-salt electrolyte for reversible Zn metal anode. Chem. Commun.54, 14097–14099. 10.1039/c8cc07730d
78
ZhangJ. Y.YaoX. H.MisraR. K.CaiQ.ZhaoY. L. (2020). Progress in electrolytes for beyond-lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. Technol.44, 237–257. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.017
79
ZhangL. Y.ChenL.ZhouX. F.LiuZ. P. (2014). Towards high-voltage aqueous metal-ion batteries beyond 1.5 V: the Zinc/Zinc hexacyanoferrate system. Adv. Energy Mater.5:1400930. 10.1002/aenm.201400930
80
ZhangX. G. (1996). Corrosion and Electrochemistry of Zinc. Berlin: Springer, 283–303. 10.1007/978-1-4757-9877-7_9
81
ZhaoJ. W.LiY. Q.PengX.DongS. M.MaJ.CuiG. L.et al. (2016). High-voltage Zn/LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 aqueous rechargeable battery by virtue of water-in-salt electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun.69, 6–10. 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.05.014
82
ZhaoQ.ZachmanM. J.Al SadatW. I.ZhengJ. X.KourkoutisL. F.ArcherL. (2018). Solid electrolyte interphases for high-energy aqueous aluminum electrochemical cells. Sci. Adv.4:eaau8131. 10.1126/sciadv.aau8131
83
ZhaoX. Y.Zhao-KargerZ. R.FichtnerM.ShenX. D. (2020). Halide-Based Materials and Chemistry for Rechargeable Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59, 5902–5949. 10.1002/anie.201902842
84
ZhengQ. F.MiuraS.MiyazakiK.KoS.WatanabeE.OkoshiM.et al. (2019). Sodium- and potassium-hydrate melts containing asymmetric imide anions for high-voltage aqueous batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.58, 14202–14207. 10.1002/anie.201908830
85
ZhouA. X.JiangL. W.YueJ. M.TongY. X.ZhangQ. Q.LinZ. J.et al. (2019). Water-in-salt electrolyte promotes high capacity FeFe(CN)6 cathode for aqueous Al-ion battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.11, 41356–41362. 10.1021/acsami.9b14149
Summary
Keywords
“water-in-salt” electrolytes, aqueous batteries, non-lithium, rechargeable metal ion batteries, high energy density
Citation
Wang Y, Meng X, Sun J, Liu Y and Hou L (2020) Recent Progress in “Water-in-Salt” Electrolytes Toward Non-lithium Based Rechargeable Batteries. Front. Chem. 8:595. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00595
Received
18 March 2020
Accepted
08 June 2020
Published
07 August 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Kwun Nam Hui, University of Macau, China
Reviewed by
Manickam Minakshi, Murdoch University, Australia; Yan Huang, Harbin Institute of Technology, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Wang, Meng, Sun, Liu and Hou.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Linrui Hou mse_houlr@ujn.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Electrochemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.