Abstract
Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a severe condition for most organs, which could occur in various tissues including brain, heart, liver, and kidney, etc. As one of the major hazards, reactive oxygen species (ROS) is excessively generated after IRI, which causes severe damage inside tissues and further induces the following injury via inflammatory response. However, current medical strategies could not thoroughly diagnose and prevent this disease, eventually leading to severe sequelae by missing the best time point for therapy. In the past decade, various nanoparticles that could selectively respond to ROS have been developed and applied in IRI. These advanced nanomedicines have shown efficient performance in detecting and treating a series of IRI (e.g., acute kidney injury, acute liver injury, and ischemic stroke, etc.), which are well-summarized in the current review. In addition, the nano-platforms (e.g., anti-IL-6 antibody, rapamycin, and hydrogen sulfide delivering nanoparticles, etc.) for preventing IRI during organ transplantation have also been included. Moreover, the development and challenges of ROS-responsive nanomedicine are systematically discussed for guiding the future direction.
Introduction
Instead of restoring and saving tissues from hypoxic conditions, the reperfusion of blood would cause severe damage to those ischemic organs via oxidative stress, which is referred as ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Normally, IRI is strongly associated with a series of diseases, such as the infraction of organs, including stroke, renal infraction, and trauma, etc. Notably, the concern of IRI often affects the best timing of reperfusion, the most effective therapy for treating ischemic disease, for example, the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (Benjamin et al., 2017). Moreover, the acute myocardial IRI can lead to coronary heart disease (CHD) that accounts for over 366,800 deaths per year and more cases with disability (Benjamin et al., 2018).
In addition to the interruption of cellular homeostasis that could damage cells via apoptotic and autophagic pathways, ischemia-reperfusion would bring great oxidative stress and further injure organs via the generation of redox free radicals, for instance, reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Zhang et al., 2007). Although appropriate ROS is essential for intracellular signaling and immune response against pathogens, the excessive ROS can not be entirely scavenged by cellular antioxidants, which would mediate the severe damage on cells by destroying organelle, cell membrane, and nuclei DNA (Nita and Grzybowski, 2016). To protect injured tissues and prevent further damage of organs during transplantation, the administration of antioxidant reagents for scavenging ROS has been widely applied, such as edaravone (Fu et al., 2020). However, the usage of edaravone is generally accompanied by a series of side effects ranging from bruising to skin inflammation or rash, leading to many concerns and demands of new types of antioxidant reagents.
In the comparison of traditional drugs, the novel nanomedicine has been gifted with more functional features including high cargos loading, specific targeting, and in-situ theranostics (Chen et al., 2018a,b; Qiao et al., 2020). With these highly controllable functions, precision therapy could be achieved. As a representative, paclitaxel albumin-bound nanoparticles (Abraxane), the FDA-approved nanomedicine has been widely employed for fighting cancer. More importantly, various nanoparticles demonstrate excellent redox activity by trapping free radicals or self-oxidation (Ni et al., 2019). Notably, an increasing number of nano-antioxidants [e.g., Mo-based polyoxometalate nanoclusters (POM), framework nucleic acid (FNA), hydrophobic ceria nanoparticles (NPs), etc.] were recruited as ROS scavenger in dealing with various diseases associate with IRI (e.g., acute kidney injury, acute liver injury, and ischemic stroke, etc.). Here, those advanced ROS-responsive nanoparticles along with antioxidants delivering nano-platforms, have been summarized in the current review to highlight the recent innovation of nanomedicine in dealing with IRI associated diseases. Moreover, the perspective of future development and facing challenges are systemically discussed.
IRI and its Threats
Organs will become ischemic if related vasculars were blockaged, which could induce irreservable damage inside the organs. However, the acute reperfusion for ischemics would cause IRI in some patients, which has been widely observed in various diseases including acute coronary syndrome, hepatic/renal acute injury and organ transplantation (Varadarajan et al., 2004). Eventrually, this unexpected complication, IRI will directly lead to a series pathological changes that manifests in brain edema, infarct progression, hemorrhagic transformation, and worsening neurologic system (Zhai et al., 2013; Prabhakaran et al., 2015). More importantly, the severe IRI may further induce systemic diseases including the inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and increase the mortality of patients, especially for those from the intensive care unit (Cryer, 2000).
General Strategies for Dealing IRI
How to deal with the IRI is of clinical importance, therefore arousing the interests of diverse scientific communities. From the aspect of clinical view, three key factors have been focused on improving the efficiency and safety of reperfusion treatment, including developing different generation thrombectomy devices, lowering the time to reperfusion and applying potential imaging techniques for enrolling suitable patients (Prabhakaran et al., 2015). However, the reality of the synergistic role of various biological mechanisms in IRI made it challenging to prevent or treat. Indeed, some medications with predicted benefits to IRI have not been proved with a definite role in prevention or treatment, likely vitamin C (Hill et al., 2019), morphine (Le Corvoisier et al., 2018), etc. In the field of liver transplantation, nearly all randomized clinical trials have ultimately failed to ameliorate liver IRI in patients (Zhai et al., 2013). Therefore, innovative strategies with smart features for targeting local environmental factor, such as ROS would be an exciting direction for IRI treatment in the future.
Nanomedicine Applied in IRI Therapy
Ischemia could be induced via physical conditions (e.g., elevated blood pressure and diabetes, etc.) or damage, which can further trigger following IRI in various organs, ranging from cerebral to renal system. Notably, the elevated ROS after reperfusion mainly contributes to cellular and tissue damage. Recently, a series of novel nanomedicine (e.g., POM and Ceria NPs, etc.) has been designed for treating affected tissues via the smartly ROS-responsive scavenge and imaging of redox in the ischemic area (Table 1).
Table 1
| Application | Type of materials | Nanomedicine | Size (nm) | Mechanism | Investigation | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebral IRI | FNA | aC5a-FNA | 10 | Antioxidant (FNA)/C5a-blocking | Protection for cerebral I/R | Li et al., 2019b |
| Cerebral IRI | Polyoxometalate | POM | ~1 | Antioxidant | Protection for cerebral I/R | Li et al., 2019a |
| Cerebral IRI | Polymer | t-PA@iRNP | 48 ± 2 | Antioxidant (LMW nitroxide)/Thrombolysis | Protection for Middle cerebral artery occlusion | Mei et al., 2019 |
| Cardiac IRI | Polymer | PEG-b-PPS | ~100 | Antioxidant (ginsenoside Rg3) | Protection for Myocardial IRI | Li et al., 2020 |
| Cardiac IRI | Polymer | CLP NPs | 150 ± 18 | Enhanced FL signal via oxidative stress | IVIS imaging of Myocardial IRI | Ziegler et al., 2019 |
| Cardiac IRI | Polymer | MCTD-NPs | 95 | Antioxidant (TPP) | Protection for Myocardial IRI | Cheng et al., 2019 |
| Hepatic IRI | Ceria | Ceria NPs | 4.48 ± 0.8 | Antioxidant | Protection for Partial hepatic IRI | Ni et al., 2019 |
| Hepatic IRI | Ceria | CeO2 | 10–30 | Antioxidant | Protection for Partial hepatic IRI | Manne et al., 2017 |
| Hepatic IRI | Polymer | BRNPs | 100 | Antioxidant (Bilirubin) | Protection for Partial hepatic IRI | Kim et al., 2017 |
| Hepatic IRI | Polymeric | PVO | 550 | Antioxidant (peroxalate esters)/Gas generation | Protection for and US imaging Partial hepatic IRI | Kang et al., 2016 |
| Renal IRI | Carbon QDs | SeCQDs | 40 | Antioxidant (doping selenium) | Protection for Glycerol/Cisplatin-induced AKI Models | Rosenkrans et al., 2020 |
| Renal IRI | FNA | DONs | 90, 120, 400 | Antioxidant | Protection for Glycerol-induced AKI Model | Jiang et al., 2018 |
| Renal IRI | Melanin | MMPP NPs | 4.5 | Antioxidant | Protection for Glycerol-induced AKI Model | Sun et al., 2019 |
| Cardiac IRI | Silica | DATS-MIONs | 230 ± 35 | H2S delivery (DATS) | Protection for Myocardial IRI | Wang et al., 2019 |
| Organ transplant | Polymer | Anti–IL-6–PLGA-NPs | 100 | Anti-IL-6 delivery | Protection for Heart allograft | Solhjou et al., 2017 |
| Organ transplant | Micelles | TRaM | 15.3 ± 2.3 | Rapamycin delivery | Protection for Aortic interposition allografts | Zhu et al., 2018 |
The representatives of novel nanomedicine for treating various IRI via ROS savaging.
FNA, Framework nucleic acid; DONs, DNA origami nanostructures; FL, Fluorescence; TPP, Triphenylphosphine; LMW, Low molecular weight; IVIS, in vivo fluorescence imaging system; AKI, Acute kidney injury; PEG, Poly ethylene glycoland; PPS, Poly propylene sulfide.
Nanomedicine for Cerebral IRI
Cerebral ischemia that generally caused by stroke is associated with high mortality and disability rate. More importantly, ROS produced by cerebral ischemia-reperfusion can further damage brain tissues via neurodegeneration. To overcome this severe disease, various of nanomaterials including polymer NPs (Reddy and Labhasetwar, 2009; Petro et al., 2016; Ghosh et al., 2017; Mei et al., 2019; Mukherjee et al., 2019), ceria NPs (Zhang et al., 2018), polyoxometalate (POM) nanoclusters (Li et al., 2019a), and Framework Nucleic Acids (Li et al., 2019b) have been applied as protective agents, indicating the high efficiency in saving cerebral tissue via ROS scavenging. Notably, the high biocompatibility allows the polymer to be widely recruited for delivering antioxidant reagents [i.e., superoxide dismutase (Reddy and Labhasetwar, 2009), antioxidants catalas (Petro et al., 2016), and curcumin (Mukherjee et al., 2019), etc]. Besides, a dual functional polymer NPs, t-PA@iRNP was successfully employed to induce thrombolytic and antioxidant therapies in cerebral tissue (Mei et al., 2019). With the encapsulation of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and conjugation of 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (4-amino-TEMPO), self-assemble t-PA@iRNP (~50 nm) demonstrated an acidic-triggered (pH = 6.2) thrombolytic activity and a significant decrease of ROS production in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model mice. More importantly, the antioxidant effect of t-PA@iRNP efficiently avoided the subarachnoid hemorrhage induced by t-PA, releasing a great potential of this dual therapy via synergistic effect.
In addition, novel bio-responsive nanomaterials containing the different status of metal ion (i.e., Mo5+ and Mo6+) or oxygen-sensitive bio-structure (i.e., DNA) showed excellent capabilities as antioxidants (Li et al., 2019a,b). For instance, a POM nanocluster was developed and employed as an ROS-responsive agent in treating rats with cerebral I/R injury (Li et al., 2019a). After intrathecal injection, POM could efficiently accumulate in the brain and reduce the oxidative pressure, eventually suppressing the apoptosis of cerebral cells, edema, and infarct volume within the brain (for about 40~50% decrease). Accompanied by IRI, excessive inflammation plays as another key factor for neuronal damage. Recently, a framework nucleic acids (FNA) conjugating with anti-C5a aptamer (aC5a) was applied in the therapy against IRI in the brain (Figure 1A) (Li et al., 2019b). More specifically, the aC5a-FNA could effectively reduce the C5a receptor on polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) and microglia, eventually bringing down the chemotaxis induced by C5a. Meanwhile, the concentrations of C5a (within plasma and penumbra) and detrimental ROS in cerebral issues were well-scavenged by aC5a-FNA administration, which efficiently protects brain cells from IRI, with a much smaller infarct volume of 17.0 ± 5.6% in comparison with that in control group (41.6 ± 7.1%).
Figure 1
Nanomedicine for Cardiac IRI
Among the leading causes of death, cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially the myocardial infarction, is extremely dangerous for any patient. As the biggest challenge, the prevention of IRI greatly affects the outcome of therapy for myocardial infarction. To date, several ROS-responsive nanomaterials have been recruited in cardiac IRI therapy via the delivery of antioxidants (i.e., resveratrol and Ginsenoside Rg3, etc.) (Bae et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020). This year, a self-assemble nanoparticle poly ethylene glycol-b-poly propylene sulfide (PEG-b-PPS) that smartly responses to ROS was successfully synthesized and used for ginsenoside Rg3 (Rg3) delivery (Li et al., 2020). PEG-b-PPS-Rg3 exhibited a ROS-dependent release of Rg3 (80% release of Rg3 within 1 day when 1.0 mM ROS was presented) and induced antioxidative stress effects by a strong interaction with FoxO3a (−6.0 kcal/mol). More importantly, the administration of PEG-b-PPS-Rg3 successfully increased the survival rate of I/R rat (90%) in comparison with the group injected with Free Rg3 (40%), indicating its high efficiency in responding to and scavenging cardiac-generated ROS. It is notable that precision targeting may increase therapeutic efficiency. To achieve that, Cheng et al. further modified Szeto-Schiller (SS)-31 and ischemic myocardium targeted peptide (IMTP) for preventing myocardial IRI via mitochondria-targeted antioxidant effect (Cheng et al., 2019). As-prepared MCTD-NPs specifically deliver resveratrol into cardiac tissues, reducing sizes of the infraction and protecting cardiomyocyte from ROS damage.
Notably, the elevated intracellular Ca2+ is strongly associated with the ROS generation in cardiac cells, which provides another therapeutic strategy via the intervention of Ca2+ influx (via anti-L-Type Ca2+ Peptide and CaMKII inhibitor) (Hardy et al., 2015; Wongrakpanich et al., 2017). However, the efficiency of channel blockage is relatively lower. Thus, the combination of antioxidant (i.e., curcumin) reagents and mitochondria-targeting functionalization (i.e., TPP) are required for improving the therapeutic effect.
Besides, several ROS-responsive nano-platforms were also developed for monitoring the status of IRI during the therapy (Yang et al., 2016; Ziegler et al., 2019). Specifically, Peter Lab developed CLP nanoparticles that could smartly light up the ROS-generated myocardium area after ischemic/reperfusion (Ziegler et al., 2019). The presentation of ROS could restore the fluorescent intensity of Ce6 that was attenuated by the aggregation-induced fluorescence quenching. By this strategy, damaged cardiac areas could be real-time detected and monitored throughout the first day after reperfusion.
Nanomedicine for Hepatic IRI
Liver, one of the major organs has played a key role in metabolisms and been involved in various functions, which demands a lot of blood supply. Hepatic ischemia and IRI, a serious complication caused by liver diseases or transplantation would directly trigger irreversible damage in liver tissue. In comparison with other organs, especially the brain, the liver is able to actively “uptake” foreign agents from blood, which allows a series of therapeutic agents to accumulate inside. Thus, antioxidant gene delivery (i.e., expression genes of extracellular superoxide dismutase, catalase or TLR-4 siRNA) (He et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2011), antioxidant prodrug (i.e., BRAP, etc.) (Lee et al., 2015), and nanoparticles (CeO2 and platinum NPS, etc.) (Katsumi et al., 2014; Kang et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2017; Manne et al., 2017; Ni et al., 2019) were recruited in treating herpetic IRI. For example, a nanoparticle was designed to release p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol (HBA) when H2O2 or LPS was presented, which could remove ROS and decrease the level of pro-inflammation factors (i.e., NO and TNF-α) (Lee et al., 2015). Moreover, Kang et al. (2016) developed smartly bio-responsive nanoparticles that could provide ultrasound (US) imaging signal during H2O2 scavenge. As-prepared PVO nanoparticles could quickly react with ROS and generate CO2 in liver tissue with IRI, offering detectable US signals as early as 25 min post injection.
Additionally, metal nanomaterials exhibiting high reducibility were used as therapeutic agents for hepatic IRI. Among all, CeO2 NPS demonstrated high biocompatibility and efficiency. More specifically, a uniform-sized ceria NPs (~4.5 nm) was synthesized, containing two valences of Ce (32.01% of Ce3+ and 67.99% of Ce4+) (Ni et al., 2019). Administration of CeO2 NPS greatly attenuated the IRI in liver tissue as early as 12 h post reperfusion (Figures 1B–D). It is crucial that the ROS scavenge mediated by CeO2 NPS efficiently inhibits the pro-inflammation cytokine secretion (i.e., IL-12, IL-1, and TNF-α, etc.) and an influx of immune cells (i.e., monocyte and neutrophils). Meanwhile, CeO2 NPS also illustrated a high quality in preventing intestinal cells from ROS-based IRI (Gubernatorova et al., 2017).
Nanomedicine for Renal IRI
Acute kidney injury (AKI) that is triggered by diseases or physical damage could lead to renal disorder/failure. In addition to general therapies like dialysis, ROS-responsive nanomedicine may provide another approach for AKI treatment. Mainly, the functional incapacitation of kidney will directly result in passive accumulation of “waste” inside, including nanomedicine injected. By taking this shortcut, advanced nanomaterials with additional functions such as acid-activated (Yoshitomi et al., 2011) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Sun et al., 2019) were designed for dealing AKI via ROS reduction. Moreover, Minami et al. also synthesized a nanomedicine (e.g., APP-103) that could effectively accumulate in non-functional kidneys and protect them from IRI during AKI or transplantation (Minami et al., 2020).
In comparison, Cai's lab successfully developed two nanomedicines specifically targeting to the kidney. Both nanoparticles, SeCQDs and DONs (DNA origami nanostructures) predominantly accumulated in the health murine kidney with ~10 and ~27%ID/g, respectively, while the kidney after AKI further enhanced the accumulation of nanoparticles (Figure 1E) (Jiang et al., 2018; Rosenkrans et al., 2020). With oxidant-sensitive structures (e.g., doped selenium and nuclei acid), SeCQDs and DONs efficiently removed excessive ROS from renal cells (Figures 1F,G).
Alternative Strategies for IRI Therapy and Organ Transplantation
In addition to an active reduction of cellular ROS, cytoprotective reagents such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are also applied as an anti-inflammation agent in various medical situations associated with ischemic diseases. It is notable that various smart nanomedicines have been prepared for H2S delivery, showing promising efficiency (Chen et al., 2019). More specifically, as-designed mesoporous iron oxide and silica nanoparticles could effectively carry and deliver H2S donor diallyl trisulfide (DATS) to ischemic organs (i.e., heart and aortic graft endothelium), eventually reducing the flowing injury caused by reperfusion (Wang et al., 2016, 2019).
Meanwhile, nano-platforms conjugating with immune-modulators could mediate desirable protection for injured or transplanted organs as well. For instance, the modification of antibodies on PLGA NPs successfully moderated the chronic rejection of transplanted heart by targeting IL-6 secreted by allograft-derived dendritic cells (ADDCs) (Solhjou et al., 2017). Furthermore, the endothelial cell inflammation and pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion following tracheal or aortic allografts could be greatly attenuated by the pre-treatment of rapamycin (Nadig et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2018).
Conclusion/Future Directions
ROS generated by ischemic reperfusion plays a crucial role in the following tissue injury. In other words, this also provides an efficient approach for dealing and preventing IRI via the reduction of ROS. Novel nanoparticles that smartly respond or consume ROS have been designed and proved for their promising performance. However, several directions and challenges should be aware for the future design of ROS-responsive nanomedicine. (a) A combination of multiple functions (i.e., imaging and therapy) in single nanomedicine is highly recommended for monitoring and treating IRI diseases; (b) Desirable IRI therapy may be achieved via dual therapy of ROS scavenge and immune-repress (i.e., H2S delivery); (c) Although alternative strategies, such as antioxidant gene delivery, may provide another direction for IRI therapy, the quick response and antioxidant effects are still the key issues for the future design of ROS-responsive nano-platforms; (d) Tissue-depended design is strongly recommended as well. For example, the antioxidant capability is more important than tissue targeting in AKI model (e.g., passive accumulation in AKI); (e) Sub-organ/cell-targeting for IRI therapy is highly suggested (i.e., antibody-induced cell targeting). Specifically, the most of antioxidant nanoparticles would be internalized by Kupffer cells during the liver IRI, which may lower the therapeutic effect of nanomedicine in major hepatic cells such as liver sinusoidal endothelial cells; (f) The antioxidant efficiency and biocompatibility should be balanced. Thus, advanced ROS-responsive nanomedicine have shown high-performance in dealing with various IRI, which exhibits a great potential in clinical translation, especially organ transplantation.
Statements
Author contributions
WC planned and wrote this review with the help of DL. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971668).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors WC.
References
1
BaeS.ParkM.KangC.DilmenS.KangT. H.KangD. G.et al. (2016). Hydrogen peroxide-responsive nanoparticle reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Am. Heart Assoc.5:e003697. 10.1161/JAHA.116.003697
2
BenjaminE. J.BlahaM. J.ChiuveS. E.CushmanM.DasS. R.DeoR.et al. (2017). Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation135, e146–e603. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485
3
BenjaminE. J.ViraniS. S.CallawayC. W.ChamberlainA. M.ChangA. R.ChengS.et al. (2018). Heart disease and stroke statistics-−2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation137, e67–e492. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558
4
ChenW.NiD.RosenkransZ. T.CaoT.CaiW. (2019). Smart H2S-triggered/therapeutic system (SHTS)-based nanomedicine. Adv. Sci.6:1901724. 10.1002/advs.201901724
5
ChenW.ZuoH.LiB.DuanC.RolfeB.ZhangB.et al. (2018a). Clay nanoparticles elicit long-term immune responses by forming biodegradable depots for sustained antigen stimulation. Small14:1704465. 10.1002/smll.201704465
6
ChenW.ZuoH.ZhangE.LiL.Henrich-NoackP.CooperH.et al. (2018b). Brain targeting delivery facilitated by ligand-functionalized layered double hydroxide nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces10, 20326–20333. 10.1021/acsami.8b04613
7
ChengY.LiuD.-Z.ZhangC.-X.CuiH.LiuM.MeiQ.-B.et al. (2019). Mitochondria-targeted antioxidant delivery for precise treatment of myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury through a multistage continuous targeted strategy. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med.16, 236–249. 10.1016/j.nano.2018.12.014
8
CryerH. G. (2000). “Ischemia and reperfusion as a cause of multiple organ failure,” in Multiple Organ Failure, eds A. E. Baue, E. Faist, and D. E. Fry (New York, NY: Springer), 108–113. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1222-5_12
9
FuZ.-Y.WuZ.-J.ZhengJ.-H.LiN.LuJ.-Y.ChenM.-H. (2020). Edaravone ameliorates renal warm ischemia-reperfusion injury by downregulating endoplasmic reticulum stress in a rat resuscitation model. Drug Des. Devel. Ther.14:175. 10.2147/DDDT.S211906
10
GhoshS.SarkarS.ChoudhuryS. T.GhoshT.DasN. (2017). Triphenyl phosphonium coated nano-quercetin for oral delivery: neuroprotective effects in attenuating age related global moderate cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury in rats. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med.13, 2439–2450. 10.1016/j.nano.2017.08.002
11
GubernatorovaE. O.LiuX.OthmanA.MuraokaW. T.KorolevaE. P.AndreescuS.et al. (2017). Europium-doped cerium oxide nanoparticles limit reactive oxygen species formation and ameliorate intestinal ischemia–reperfusion injury. Adv. Healthcare Mater.6:1700176. 10.1002/adhm.201700176
12
HardyN.ViolaH. M.JohnstoneV. P.ClemonsT. D.Cserne SzappanosH.SinghR.et al. (2015). Nanoparticle-mediated dual delivery of an antioxidant and a peptide against the L-type Ca2+ channel enables simultaneous reduction of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. ACS Nano9, 279–289. 10.1021/nn5061404
13
HeS. Q.ZhangY. H.VenugopalS. K.DicusC. W.PerezR. V.RamsamoojR.et al. (2006). Delivery of antioxidative enzyme genes protects against ischemia/reperfusion–induced liver injury in mice. Liver Transpl.12, 1869–1879. 10.1002/lt.21001
14
HillA.ClasenK. C.WendtS.MajorosA. G.StoppeC.AdhikariN. K. J.et al. (2019). Effects of vitamin C on organ function in cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients11:2103. 10.3390/nu11092103
15
JiangD.GeZ.ImH.-J.EnglandC. G.NiD.HouJ.et al. (2018). DNA origami nanostructures can exhibit preferential renal uptake and alleviate acute kidney injury. Nat. Biomed. Eng.2, 865–877. 10.1038/s41551-018-0317-8
16
JiangN.ZhangX.ZhengX.ChenD.ZhangY.SiuL.et al. (2011). Targeted gene silencing of TLR4 using liposomal nanoparticles for preventing liver ischemia reperfusion injury. Am. J. Transpl.11, 1835–1844. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03660.x
17
KangC.ChoW.ParkM.KimJ.ParkS.ShinD.et al. (2016). H2O2-triggered bubble generating antioxidant polymeric nanoparticles as ischemia/reperfusion targeted nanotheranostics. Biomaterials85, 195–203. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.070
18
KatsumiH.FukuiK.SatoK.MaruyamaS.YamashitaS.MizumotoE.et al. (2014). Pharmacokinetics and preventive effects of platinum nanoparticles as reactive oxygen species scavengers on hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Metallomics6, 1050–1056. 10.1039/C4MT00018H
19
KimJ. Y.LeeD. Y.KangS.MiaoW.KimH.LeeY.et al. (2017). Bilirubin nanoparticle preconditioning protects against hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Biomaterials133, 1–10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.011
20
Le CorvoisierP.GalletR.LesaultP. F.AudureauE.PaulM.TernacleJ.et al. (2018). Intra-coronary morphine versus placebo in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the MIAMI randomized controlled trial. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.18:193. 10.1186/s12872-018-0936-8
21
LeeD.ParkS.BaeS.JeongD.ParkM.KangC.et al. (2015). Hydrogen peroxide-activatable antioxidant prodrug as a targeted therapeutic agent for ischemia-reperfusion injury. Sci. Rep.5:16592. 10.1038/srep16592
22
LiH.SunJ.-J.ChenG.-Y.WangW.-W.XieZ.-T.TangG.-F.et al. (2016). Carnosic acid nanoparticles suppress liver ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibition of ROS, caspases and NF-κB signaling pathway in mice. Biomed. Pharmacother.82, 237–246. 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.04.064
23
LiL.WangY.GuoR.LiS.NiJ.GaoS.et al. (2020). Ginsenoside Rg3-loaded, reactive oxygen species-responsive polymeric nanoparticles for alleviating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Control. Release317, 259–272. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.11.032
24
LiS.JiangD.EhlerdingE. B.RosenkransZ. T.EngleJ. W.WangY.et al. (2019a). Intrathecal administration of nanoclusters for protecting neurons against oxidative stress in cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. ACS Nano13, 13382–13389. 10.1021/acsnano.9b06780
25
LiS.JiangD.RosenkransZ. T.BarnhartT. E.EhlerdingE. B.NiD.et al. (2019b). Aptamer-conjugated framework nucleic acids for the repair of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Nano Lett.19, 7334–7341. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02958
26
ManneN. D.ArvapalliR.GraffeoV. A.BandarupalliV. V.ShokuhfarT.PatelS.et al. (2017). Prophylactic treatment with cerium oxide nanoparticles attenuate hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in sprague dawley rats. Cell. Physiol. Biochem.42, 1837–1846. 10.1159/000479540
27
MeiT.KimA.VongL. B.MarushimaA.PuentesS.MatsumaruY.et al. (2019). Encapsulation of tissue plasminogen activator in pH-sensitive self-assembled antioxidant nanoparticles for ischemic stroke treatment–synergistic effect of thrombolysis and antioxidant. Biomaterials215:119209. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.020
28
MinamiK.BaeS.UeharaH.ZhaoC.LeeD.IskeJ.et al. (2020). Targeting of intragraft reactive oxygen species by APP-103, a novel polymer product, mitigates ischemia/reperfusion injury and promotes the survival of renal transplants. Am. J. Transpl.20, 1527–1537. 10.1111/ajt.15794
29
MukherjeeA.SarkarS.JanaS.SwarnakarS.DasN. (2019). Neuro-protective role of nanocapsulated curcumin against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion induced oxidative injury. Brain Res.1704, 164–173. 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.016
30
NadigS. N.DixitS. K.LeveyN.EsckilsenS.MillerK.DennisW.et al. (2015). Immunosuppressive nano-therapeutic micelles downregulate endothelial cell inflammation and immunogenicity. RSC Adv.5, 43552–43562. 10.1039/C5RA04057D
31
NiD.WeiH.ChenW.BaoQ.RosenkransZ. T.BarnhartT. E.et al. (2019). Ceria nanoparticles meet hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury: the perfect imperfection. Adv. Mater.31:1902956. 10.1002/adma.201902956
32
NitaM.GrzybowskiA. (2016). The role of the reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress in the pathomechanism of the age-related ocular diseases and other pathologies of the anterior and posterior eye segments in adults. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2016:3164734. 10.1155/2016/3164734
33
PetroM.JafferH.YangJ.KabuS.MorrisV. B.LabhasetwarV. (2016). Tissue plasminogen activator followed by antioxidant-loaded nanoparticle delivery promotes activation/mobilization of progenitor cells in infarcted rat brain. Biomaterials81, 169–180. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.009
34
PrabhakaranS.RuffI.BernsteinR. A. (2015). Acute stroke intervention: a systematic review. JAMA313, 1451–1462. 10.1001/jama.2015.3058
35
QiaoY.HeJ.ChenW.YuY.LiW.DuZ.et al. (2020). Light-activatable synergistic therapy of drug-resistant bacteria-infected cutaneous chronic wounds and nonhealing keratitis by cupriferous hollow nanoshells. ACS Nano14, 3299–3315. 10.1021/acsnano.9b08930
36
ReddyM. K.LabhasetwarV. (2009). Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of superoxide dismutase to the brain: an effective strategy to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury. FASEB J.23, 1384–1395. 10.1096/fj.08-116947
37
RosenkransZ. T.SunT.JiangD.ChenW.BarnhartT. E.ZhangZ.et al. (2020). Selenium-doped carbon quantum dots act as broad-spectrum antioxidants for acute kidney injury management. Adv. Sci.7:2000420. 10.1002/advs.202000420
38
SolhjouZ.UeharaM.BahmaniB.MaaroufO. H.IchimuraT.BrooksC. R.et al. (2017). Novel application of localized nanodelivery of anti–interleukin-6 protects organ transplant from ischemia–reperfusion injuries. Am. J. Transpl.17, 2326–2337. 10.1111/ajt.14266
39
SunT.JiangD.RosenkransZ. T.EhlerdingE. B.NiD.QiC.et al. (2019). A melanin-based natural antioxidant defense nanosystem for theranostic application in acute kidney injury. Adv. Funct. Mater.29:1904833. 10.1002/adfm.201904833
40
VaradarajanR.Golden-MasonL.YoungL.McloughlinP.NolanN.McenteeG.et al. (2004). Nitric oxide in early ischaemia reperfusion injury during human orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation78, 250–256. 10.1097/01.TP.0000128188.45553.8C
41
WangW.LiuH.LuY.WangX.ZhangB.CongS.et al. (2019). Controlled-releasing hydrogen sulfide donor based on dual-modal iron oxide nanoparticles protects myocardial tissue from ischemia–reperfusion injury. Int. J. Nanomed.14:875. 10.2147/IJN.S186225
42
WangW.SunX.ZhangH.YangC.LiuY.YangW.et al. (2016). Controlled release hydrogen sulfide delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles protects graft endothelium from ischemia–reperfusion injury. Int. J. Nanomed.11:3255. 10.2147/IJN.S104604
43
WongrakpanichA.MorrisA. S.GearyS. M.Mei-LingA. J.SalemA. K. (2017). Surface-modified particles loaded with CaMKII inhibitor protect cardiac cells against mitochondrial injury. Int. J. Pharm.520, 275–283. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.061
44
YangL.RenY.PanW.YuZ.TongL.LiN.et al. (2016). Fluorescent nanocomposite for visualizing cross-talk between microRNA-21 and hydrogen peroxide in ischemia-reperfusion injury in live cells and in vivo. Anal. Chem.88, 11886–11891. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03701
45
YoshitomiT.HirayamaA.NagasakiY. (2011). The ROS scavenging and renal protective effects of pH-responsive nitroxide radical-containing nanoparticles. Biomaterials32, 8021–8028. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.014
46
ZhaiY.PetrowskyH.HongJ. C.BusuttilR. W.Kupiec-WeglinskiJ. W. (2013). Ischaemia-reperfusion injury in liver transplantation—from bench to bedside. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.10, 79–89. 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.225
47
ZhangT.LiC.-Y.JiaJ.-J.ChiJ.-S.ZhouD.LiJ.-Z.et al. (2018). Combination therapy with LXW7 and ceria nanoparticles protects against acute cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Curr. Med. Sci.38, 144–152. 10.1007/s11596-018-1858-5
48
ZhangW.WangM.XieH.ZhouL.MengX.ShiJ.et al. (2007). Role of reactive oxygen species in mediating hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and its therapeutic applications in liver transplantation. Transpl. Proc.39, 1332–1337. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.11.021
49
ZhuP.AtkinsonC.DixitS.ChengQ.TranD.PatelK.et al. (2018). Organ preservation with targeted rapamycin nanoparticles: a pre-treatment strategy preventing chronic rejection in vivo. RSC Adv.8, 25909–25919. 10.1039/C8RA01555D
50
ZieglerM.XuX.YapM. L.HuH.ZhangJ.PeterK. (2019). A self-assembled fluorescent nanoprobe for imaging and therapy of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury. Adv. Ther.2:1800133. 10.1002/adtp.201800133
Summary
Keywords
bioresponsive nanomedicine, ischemia-reperfusion injury, reactive oxygen species, organ transplantation, nanoparticles
Citation
Chen W and Li D (2020) Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-Responsive Nanomedicine for Solving Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Front. Chem. 8:732. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00732
Received
25 June 2020
Accepted
15 July 2020
Published
21 August 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Dawei Jiang, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Reviewed by
Zhilei Ge, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China; Weijun Wei, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Chen and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Deling Li ttyyneuroli@126.com
This article was submitted to Nanoscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.