Impact Factor 5.221 | CiteScore 4.1
More on impact ›

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Chem., 04 May 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.668186

Modulating Target Protein Biology Through the Re-mapping of Conformational Distributions Using Small Molecules

Alastair D. G. Lawson1*, Malcolm MacCoss2, Dominique L. Baeten1, Alex Macpherson1, Jiye Shi1 and Alistair J. Henry1
  • 1UCB Pharma, Slough, United Kingdom
  • 2Bohicket Consulting LLC, Seabrook Island, SC, United States

Over the last 10 years considerable progress has been made in the application of small molecules to modulating protein-protein interactions (PPIs), and the navigation from “undruggable” to a host of candidate molecules in clinical trials has been well-charted in recent, comprehensive reviews. Structure-based design has played an important role in this scientific journey, with three dimensional structures guiding medicinal chemistry efforts. However, the importance of two additional dimensions: movement and time is only now being realised, as increasing computing power, closely aligned with wet lab validation, is applied to the challenge. Protein dynamics are fundamental to biology and disease, and application to PPI drug discovery has massively widened the scope for new chemical entities to influence function from allosteric, and previously unreported, sites. In this forward-looking perspective we highlight exciting, new opportunities for small molecules to modulate disease biology, by adjusting the frequency profile of natural conformational sampling, through the stabilisation of clinically desired conformers of target proteins.

Introduction

Recent reviews (Lu et al., 2020; Serapian and Colombo, 2020) have skilfully and comprehensively described progress in the development of PPI small molecule modulators, building on the work of pioneers such as Jim Wells in the early 2000s (Arkin and Wells, 2004; Hardy and Wells, 2004), and with the approval of Venetoclax (ABT-199) in 2016, a trail has now been blazed. Venetoclax was the first BCL-2-selective BH3-mimetic to achieve FDA approval for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL), and thus represents a milestone in small molecules targeting PPIs (Roberts and Huang, 2017). Structural Biology has been an important companion on this journey, as three-dimensional structures of proteins continue to inform computer-aided drug design (CADD). However, such images, although visually compelling, do not give us the full picture, often hiding opportunities for allosteric inhibition and stabilisation (Ni et al., 2019), because they lack two vital components: movement and time.

This spatial-temporal relationship is called protein dynamics and is increasingly seen as an important facet of normal biology and pathophysiology (Bu and Callaway, 2011), complementing genetic variation and post-translational modification.

In order to understand the concept of protein dynamics, the importance of conformational sampling of different structural states in biology and disease, and how we can intervene clinically with novel therapeutics to restore normal function, an analogy may be helpful. Let us consider a target protein as a bascule, or lifting bridge, over a canal!

The Canal Bridge

The bridge has two useful functions: enabling road traffic and barge traffic and must adopt two different conformations to service both but at different times. The bridge thus creates an either/or solution using the same structural elements. The distribution of angles of the drawbridge ranges from 0° (fully down and open to road traffic) to 90° (up and open to barges), with 1–89° angles visited during transition. These are the main structural conformations the bridge samples, but in addition there is a time element demonstrating that in normal operation it spends 97% of the time at 0° (allowing the greater volume of road traffic to flow freely), 2% at 90° (allowing the passage of occasional barges) and 1% in the range 1–89° moving between the normal operational states. With the bridge fully functional and free to sample all conformations with appropriate frequency, road hauliers and barge masters are both well and differentially served.

As the bridge spends the majority of its time at 0°, satellite photographs are likely to show it in this closed state and give no clue about its open 90° state. Not only is the 0° state the most likely to be observed, it is also the least energetically costly and will require input of energy to perturb. So it is with crystal structures; there is no evidence that other conformations are possible; we thus have a narrow view and limited options for drug targeting.

In contrast, the 90° state can be thought of as a metastable, higher energy state, that would fall to 0° in the absence of energy input but is still fairly stable once achieved. A hydraulic stepping motor is used to input energy between 0 and 90°, and achieves the desired lift in three stages, briefly pausing at 30 and 60° for re-priming to accommodate ram extensions. These two intermediate states at 30 and 60° can be seen as islands of high energy, sampled during every ascent, and descent but with short residence times.

If there is a problem with the hydraulic lifting mechanism, either a design fault (equivalent to a genetic defect) or a maintenance issue (representing disease), the ability of the bridge to sample the required conformational states, with the appropriate frequency to function effectively, will be compromised.

For example, if there is a problem with the hydraulic motor, the bridge may be unable to lift beyond 60° at every attempt, preventing the free passage of barges on the canal. Barge masters face delays and may use the steel bows of their barges to nudge the bridge up from 60° to enable access, which may be thought of as induced fit!

Conversely if the dump valve is mal-functioning, the bridge may be unable to close fully at every attempt, resting at the 30° point and blocking the road. Road hauliers face detours, and joy riders in stolen cars compound the problem by attempting to jump the gap, crashing into the canal and filling hospital beds, relating to disease pathology.

The distribution of potential angles sampled by the faulty bridge is the same, but the distribution of time spent in each state is different. For example with a malfunction rate of 90% the time distribution is:

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of time the bridge spends sampling different angles (0, 1–89, and 90°).

Of course, with the bridge malfunctioning, it may be decided that road transport is more important to the economy and should be prioritised, in which case the bridge could be held in the 0° state and the hydraulic lifting mechanism overcome; this would equate to a blocking antibody approach orthosterically preventing raising by placing a heavy weight at the end of the bridge.

Conversely, should barge traffic be prioritised, the bridge could be tagged for demolition, which would be more like a targeted protein degradation (TPD) approach, where a small molecule brings a target into close proximity with an E3 ligase, leading to ubiquitination of the target and its subsequent destruction.

An elegant and desirable solution to the problem in each case would be to place small wedges in at the hinge of the bridge to facilitate either complete raising or lowering. The wedges can be thought of as small molecules reversibly re-mapping the conformational sampling of target proteins from allosteric sites according to their angles.

Learning From the Professionals

Antibodies have a few 100 million years start on us in targeting PPIs, and hence are well-placed to be our allies in conformational definition of target proteins. We can also meaningfully consider how the immune system has evolved to create extraordinary diversity of binding sites with positive selection of hits and analogues based solely on affinity. Nature worked out that the PPI problem was too difficult to solve by design in time and that selection from ultra-large, constantly replenished libraries of variable region sequences, which are linked to their amplifiable, genetic blueprints, was the practical solution.

In addition, antibodies that modify function can teach us about how they are doing it, and while many will simply be acting orthosterically, some will be binding to allosteric sites and exerting their influence at distal interfaces (Staus et al., 2016). The latter are of particular interest, as in many cases they will be stabilising conformations of interest which are not represented in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). A particularly striking example was provided from the binding of the Fab fragment of an antibody to IgE, an important target in asthma (Drinkwater et al., 2014). This showed the most potent, neutralising Fab molecules stabilising an extended, linear conformation of IgE, very different from the bent form represented in crystal structures. In this case the antibody provided useful wet lab validation for a conformation which had been predicted by molecular dynamics simulations but thought likely to be only very rarely sampled.

Function-modifying antibodies, which are stabilising druggable conformations, can be used as scaffolding to define and present the target in an energy-minimised state, just as scaffolding could be used by a maintenance crew working on the canal bridge to support the 30 or 60° states when checking the wedges. With the target protein frozen in time, hidden pockets only available as the protein passes naturally through transiently sampled conformers can be revealed. These allosteric binding sites are likely to be less well-conserved than orthosteric sites and can be exploited in screens utilising such antibody/target protein complexes, to enable weakly binding, but possibly more specific, chemical starting points to gain a foothold. Following elaboration, binding of the compound becomes robust enough for the antibody scaffolding to be removed. As the antibody has already validated the clinical desirability of the specific target conformation, if the compound can faithfully reproduce this same conformation it can be expected to achieve similar biology, considerably reducing biological risk in small molecule drug discovery (Lawson, 2012). Use of an antibody in this context increases the probability of discovering small molecules that can stabilise interesting conformers of target proteins but does not guarantee that each small molecule that binds to an antibody-stabilised state will be able to define that conformer once the antibody has been removed.

Drug Discovery

The study of molecular dynamics aims to address important gaps in our knowledge to predict possible conformations, reveal cryptic binding sites and support drug discovery through computational modelling (Kuzmanic et al., 2020). With ever increasing amounts of computing power being applied to predicting protein dynamics, we are seeing accuracy increasing, and no doubt machine-learning and artificial intelligence will find their place (Greener and Sternberg, 2018). But such advances are only as good as the quality and quantity of the input data and are thus influenced and possibly curtailed by the bias of previous experience (Rodrigues, 2020). In addition, the timeframe for large protein movements is greater than, and not always compatible with, the computationally power-hungry microsecond to millisecond timeframes needed for meaningful molecular dynamics simulations (Cossins and Lawson, 2015), leading to over emphasis on local effects with potentially important and advantageously druggable conformations remaining unexplored.

It is thus vitally important for such in silico predictions to not become self-fulfilling prophesies, but that they are tested and validated in the real world. Wet lab techniques such as Double Electron-electron Resonance (DEER) are particularly useful in this regard, providing distance measurements which can confirm expected conformers or indicate new states. Existing crystal structures can be adjusted to create working models of target proteins in biologically relevant conformations. Even lowly populated states can be revealed by DEER, such as the distorted trimer of TNF, which had a natural sampling frequency of just 6% (Carrington et al., 2017), but had been predicted by molecular dynamics simulations. This naturally sampled deviation from trimerous symmetry proved to be druggable, with allosteric, orally available small molecules, which stabilise the distorted trimer and inhibit signalling through TNFR1, being discovered from an original fragment hit (O'Connell et al., 2019; McMillan et al., 2021). TNF has long been successfully targeted by biologics acting orthosterically (Lim et al., 2018), and the demonstration that equivalent biology can be achieved by small molecules binding allosterically represents a quantum step forward in tackling high affinity (pM) PPIs featuring large surface areas of engagement. Antibody definition of the specifically distorted state has also provided an extremely useful target engagement biomarker for the small molecule (Lightwood et al., 2021), and offers scope to increase intellectual property rights beyond just the chemical matter.

Compounds working in this way bind during the brief period when the protein is sampling the desired state to stabilise this conformation and re-equilibrate the biology. They thus tend to have slow apparent association rates, while they wait for the protein to sample the correct orientation with limited temporal accessibility, and thus benefit from being cell-penetrant, so that the protein is secreted already in a small molecule-normalised and clinically sought state. In addition, compounds with this mechanism of action have slow dissociation rates, and just like the wedges acting at the hinge in the canal bridge, need to be of rigid, non-flexible construction, so that occupancy of their binding site is enough to translate directly to the desired effect resulting from their binding. Wedges that bend or become distorted when used in the hinge can create a situation of 100% occupancy, but with <100% Emax in functional assays, as the compound-bound protein can occasionally still move sufficiently to sample clinically undesirable conformers (Lawson et al., 2018).

While the illustrations so far have focused primarily on inhibiting PPIs, similar concepts can be applied to promoting desired and naturally occurring PPIs, as in Targeted Protein Degradation, for example. Small molecules may be used as bi-specific reagents (PROTACs) or as molecular glues, and as the target-preferred ligase interactions for the protein-protein complex pre-exist, the energy barrier to agonism may well be easier to overcome with compounds featuring only modest affinity (Schreiber, 2019). In addition, compounds could be used to stabilise one partner in a favourable conformation to augment binding.

Sources of Chemical Matter

During the 1990s constraints on the sampling of chemical diversity, imposed by the archiving and screening logistics associated with high throughput screening (HTS), were addressed by the introduction of libraries featuring low molecular weight fragments capable of representing broader chemical space than conventional compound decks (Hajduk et al., 1997). While the approach has been successful, in that a number of drugs arising from fragment-based discovery have been approved (Valenti et al., 2019; Osborne et al., 2020), experience also shows that it can be a long haul to go from analogues of a millimolar affinity small fragment hit to first get on scale in an activity assay and then to build in sufficient potency for the compound to be considered a lead, particularly for PPI targets, even with structural data to guide the design.

Application of molecular dynamics simulations to provide flexible docking for virtual screening has enabled large libraries of fragments and compounds to be screened and ranked in silico, so that virtual hits can be more accurately prioritised before their binding is confirmed in the wet lab (Bissaro et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2020). Accuracy with this approach is closely linked to increasing computing power, and the method is perhaps most useful in providing valuable information about both druggable sites and concomitant chemical matter.

DNA-encoded chemical libraries (Brenner and Lerner, 1992; Neri and Lerner, 2018; Madsen et al., 2020) offer unparalleled diversity and fast hit identification, using technology closely related to antibody phage library panning (Smith, 1985), in that the instructions for synthesis are physically linked to the compound. Early application to the LFA-1/ICAM PPI demonstrated the potential (Kollmann et al., 2014). Nanomolar affinities with commendable solubility and developability can be obtained from hits “straight out of the box,” and although attrition is seen at the re-synthesis and DNA-removal steps, the technology is already fulfilling its promise. In many ways this option would seem to offer the best of both worlds combining strong representation of diverse chemical space with affinity-based one pot selection of hits; the parallels with natural antibody generation are striking. Second round screening in carefully designed activity assays, followed by tertiary screening on cells, can relatively quickly define useful compounds ready to enter the hit-to-lead stage. Libraries of this size are likely to be needed to take full advantage of the new biological space becoming available for PPIs, with traditional chemical collections, which were predominantly designed to service enzyme pockets, sometimes giving very few hits in this area of space.

Discussion

Recent papers show that PPI targets, for long considered the preserve of biologicals, are succumbing to small molecules which bind allosterically at relatively protected, and often less assiduously conserved, allosteric sites. The compounds stabilise naturally sampled conformations of protein targets, which are either incompatible with binding to partner proteins, or promote clinically favourable interactions. Thus, the adage that such interactions were undruggable with small molecules can be overturned through imaginative thinking, advances in technology and by re-mapping the conformational distributions of proteins. By tapping into the natural fine tuning of conformational state space, which underpins biological function and regulation (Schmid and Hugel, 2020), we can advantageously engage small molecules to modulate PPIs in precise and subtle ways.

For all the intellectual elegance of in silico methods and the seductive power of today's technology, serendipity and open minds will remain essential components of innovative drug discovery, and we as an industry should remember that patients don't care how their drugs were discovered; they just want them to be effective and safe, and they want them now.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions generated for the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to scientific concepts and writing the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that this study received funding from UCB Pharma. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

AL, DB, AM, JS and AH are employed by the company UCB Pharma. MM was employed by Bohicket Consulting LLC.

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues at UCB for helpful discussions.

References

Arkin, M. R., and Wells, J. A. (2004). Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 3, 301–317. doi: 10.1038/nrd1343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bissaro, M., Sturlese, M., and Moro, S. (2020). The rise of molecular simulations in fragment-based drug design (FBDD): an overview. Drug Discov. Today 25, 1693–1701. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.06.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brenner, S., and Lerner, R. A. (1992). Encoded combinatorial chemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 5381–5383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5381

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bu, Z., and Callaway, D. J. E. (2011). Proteins move! Protein dynamics and long-range allostery in cell signalling. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 83, 163–221. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381262-9.00005-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carrington, B., Myers, W. K., Horanyi, P., Calmiano, M., and Lawson, A. D. G. (2017). Natural conformational sampling of human TNFα visualized by double electron-electron resonance. Biophys. J. 113, 371–380. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cossins, B. P., and Lawson, A. D. G. (2015). Small molecule targeting of protein-protein interactions through allosteric modulation of dynamics. Molecules 20, 16435–16445. doi: 10.3390/molecules200916435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drinkwater, N., Cossins, B. P., Keeble, A. H., Wright, M., Cain, K., Hailu, H., et al. (2014). Human immunoglobulin E flexes between acutely bent and extended conformations. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 397–404. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Greener, J. G., and Sternberg, M. J. E. (2018). Structure-based prediction of protein allostery. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 50, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hajduk, P. J., Meadows, R. P., and Fesik, S. W. (1997). Discovering high affinity ligands for proteins. Science 278, 497–499. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5337.497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hardy, J. A., and Wells, J. A. (2004). Searching for new allosteric sites in enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 14, 706–715. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.10.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kollmann, C. S., Bai, X., Tsai, C.-H., Yang, H., Lind, K. E., Skinner, S. R., et al. (2014). Application of encoded library technology (ELT) to a protein-protein interaction target: discovery of a potent class of integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) antagonists. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 22, 2353–2365. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.01.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuzmanic, A., Bowman, G. R., Juarez-Jimenez, J., Michel, J., and Gervasio, F. L. (2020). Investigating cryptic binding sites by molecular dynamics simulations. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 654–661. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00613

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lawson, A. D. G. (2012). Antibody-enabled small molecule drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 519–525. doi: 10.1038/nrd3756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lawson, A. D. G., MacCoss, M., and Heer, J. P. (2018). Importance of rigidity in designing small molecule drugs to tackle protein-protein interactions (PPIs) through stabilization of desired conformers. J. Med. Chem. 61, 4283–4289. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lightwood, D. J., Munro, B. J., Porter, J., McMillan, D., Carrington, B., Turner, A., et al. (2021). A conformation-selective monoclonal antibody against a small molecule-stabilised signalling-deficient form of TNF. Nat. Commun. 12:583. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20825-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, H., Lee, S. H., Lee, H. T., Lee, J. U., Son, J. Y., Shin, W., and Heo, Y.-S. (2018). Structural Biology of the TNFα antagonists used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Int. J. Med. Sci. 19, 768–782. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, X., Li, X., and Lin, X. (2020). A review on applications of computational methods in drug screening and design. Molecules 25, 1375–1392. doi: 10.3390/molecules25061375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, H., Zhou, Q., He, J., Jiang, Z., Peng, C., Tong, R., et al. (2020). Recent advances in the development of protein-protein interactions modulators: mechanisms and clinical trials. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 5, 213–245. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00315-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Madsen, D., Azevedo, C., Micco, I., Petersen, L. K., and Hansen, N. J. V. (2020). An overview of DNA-encoded libraries: a versatile tool for drug discovery. Prog. Med. Chem. 59, 181–249. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmch.2020.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McMillan, D., Martinez-Fleites, C., Porter, J., Fox, D. III., Davis, R., Mori, P., et al. (2021). Structural insights into the disruption of TNF-TNFR1 signalling by small molecules stabilising a distorted TNF. Nat. Commun. 12:582. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20828-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neri, D., and Lerner, R. A. (2018). DNA-encoded libraries: a selection system based on endowing organic chemicals with amplifiable information. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 479–502. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012550

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ni, D., Lu, S., and Zhang, J. (2019). Emerging roles of allosteric modulators in the regulation of protein-protein interactions (PPIs): a new paradigm for PPI drug discovery. Med. Res. Rev. 39, 2314–2342. doi: 10.1002/med.21585

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Connell, J., Porter, J., Kroeplein, B., Norman, T., Rapecki, S., Davis, R., et al. (2019). Small molecules that inhibit TNF signalling by stabilising an asymmetric form of the trimer. Nat. Commun. 10, 5795–5807. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13616-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osborne, J., Panova, S., Rapti, M., Urushima, T., and Jhoti, H. (2020). Fragments: where are we now? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 48, 271–280. doi: 10.1042/BST20190694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roberts, A. W., and Huang, D. C. S. (2017). Targeting BCL2 with BH3 mimetics: basic science and clinical application of venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related B cell malignancies. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 101, 89–98. doi: 10.1002/cpt.553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodrigues, T. (2020). The good, the bad, and the ugly in chemical and biological data for machine learning. Drug Discov. Today Tech. 32, 3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmid, S., and Hugel, T. (2020). Controlling protein function by fine-tuning conformational flexibility. eLife 9, e57180–e57194. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schreiber, S. L. (2019). A chemical biology view of bioactive small molecules and a binder-based approach to connect biology to precision medicines. Isr. J. Chem. 59, 52–59. doi: 10.1002/ijch.201800113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Serapian, S. A., and Colombo, G. (2020). Designing molecular spanners to throw in the protein networks. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 4656–4670. doi: 10.1002/chem.201904523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, G. P. (1985). Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science 228, 1315–1317. doi: 10.1126/science.4001944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Staus, D. P., Strachan, R. T., Manglik, A., Pani, B., Kahsai, A. W., Kim, T. H., et al. (2016). Allosteric nanobodies reveal the dynamic range and diverse mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptor activation. Nature 535, 448–452. doi: 10.1038/nature18636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valenti, D., Hristeva, S., Tzalis, D., and Ottmann, C. (2019). Clinical candidates modulating protein-protein interactions: the fragment-based experience. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 167, 76–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.01.084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: protein-protein interactions, conformational sampling, conformational distributions, conformer, allosteric, small molecule, drug discovery, molecular dynamics

Citation: Lawson ADG, MacCoss M, Baeten DL, Macpherson A, Shi J and Henry AJ (2021) Modulating Target Protein Biology Through the Re-mapping of Conformational Distributions Using Small Molecules. Front. Chem. 9:668186. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.668186

Received: 15 February 2021; Accepted: 30 March 2021;
Published: 04 May 2021.

Edited by:

Simona Rapposelli, University of Pisa, Italy

Reviewed by:

Gregory Bowman, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, United States
Chiara Borsari, University of Basel, Switzerland

Copyright © 2021 Lawson, MacCoss, Baeten, Macpherson, Shi and Henry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Alastair D. G. Lawson, alastair.lawson@ucb.com