Rhodopsins: An Excitingly Versatile Protein Species for Research, Development and Creative Engineering

Abstract

The first member and eponym of the rhodopsin family was identified in the 1930s as the visual pigment of the rod photoreceptor cell in the animal retina. It was found to be a membrane protein, owing its photosensitivity to the presence of a covalently bound chromophoric group. This group, derived from vitamin A, was appropriately dubbed retinal. In the 1970s a microbial counterpart of this species was discovered in an archaeon, being a membrane protein also harbouring retinal as a chromophore, and named bacteriorhodopsin. Since their discovery a photogenic panorama unfolded, where up to date new members and subspecies with a variety of light-driven functionality have been added to this family. The animal branch, meanwhile categorized as type-2 rhodopsins, turned out to form a large subclass in the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors and are essential to multiple elements of light-dependent animal sensory physiology. The microbial branch, the type-1 rhodopsins, largely function as light-driven ion pumps or channels, but also contain sensory-active and enzyme-sustaining subspecies. In this review we will follow the development of this exciting membrane protein panorama in a representative number of highlights and will present a prospect of their extraordinary future potential.

Introduction

The first member and eponym of the rhodopsin family was identified in the 1930s as the visual pigment of the rod photoreceptor cell in the animal retina (Tansley, 1931; Wald, 1935). It turned out to be a membrane protein, owing its photosensitivity to the presence of a covalently bound chromophoric group. This photosensitive group, derived from vitamin A, was appropriately coined retinene, later officially renamed as retinal (Wald, 1935; Morton and Goodwin, 1944; Morton and Pitt, 1957). The visual pigments harboured a special conformer of this polyene compound, in casu the 11-cis configuration (Hubbard and Wald, 1952; Hubbard et al., 1971) (Figure 1). Upon photo-activation the chromophore was converted into the all-trans configuration, which triggered a sequel of conformational changes in the protein, leading to its active state (Wald, 1953; Morton and Pitt, 1957; Dartnall, 1962a). Eventually the chromophore was released as all-trans retinal (Dartnall, 1962c; Wald, 1968; Hubbard et al., 1971; Bridges, 1972). Surprisingly, in the 1970s a microbial counterpart of this protein was discovered in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum (at the time referred to as Halobacterium halobium), which also harboured retinal as a chromophore, and was named bacteriorhodopsin (Oesterhelt and Stoeckenius, 1971). This membrane protein, however, contained the all-trans configuration, which upon photo-activation was converted into the 13-cis configuration (Smith et al., 1985; Oesterhelt, 1998). The resulting active state of the protein in this case thermally decayed in a sequel of steps whereby the chromophore eventually was thermally re-isomerized into the all-trans configuration returning to the original starting state (Oesterhelt, 1998; Lanyi, 2004).

FIGURE 1

Since their discovery a photogenic panorama unfolded, where up to date new members and subspecies with a variety of light-driven functionality have been added to these families. The animal branch, categorized as type-2 rhodopsins, turned out to form part of the major subclass in the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (Bennett et al., 1982; Kühn, 1984; Crescitelli, 1991; Hargrave and McDowell, 1992). Currently they have diversified into at least eleven groups (Opn1–Opn9, R-group, Cn-group) most of which are essential to multiple elements of light-dependent animal sensory physiology. Depending on the animal species, they can be located in multiple tissues next to the eye (Terakita, 2005; Davies et al., 2015). Meanwhile, the microbial branch was named as type-1 rhodopsins, which largely function as light-driven ion pumps or channels, but also contain sensory-active and enzyme-sustaining subspecies (Oesterhelt, 1998; Spudich et al., 2000; Ernst et al., 2014; Leung and Montell, 2017; Nagata and Inoue, 2022). The most recent addition to the microbial rhodopsins is the heliorhodopsin family, which is remarkably different from the type-1 family in their inverted orientation in the membrane, with the N-terminal now residing in the intracellular compartment (Pushkarev et al., 2018; Shihoya et al., 2019; Kovalev et al., 2020b; Rozenberg et al., 2021; Chazan et al., 2022). The physiological function of this new family has not become very clear as of yet.

In this review we follow the historical development of this exciting membrane protein panorama in a representative number of highlights and present a prospect of their extraordinary future potential. We broadly outline their functional diversity and physiological relevance, as a comprehensive description is outside the scope of this review. A large number of excellent reviews on the rhodopsin families have been published, many of which we have referred to where appropriate, along with the most relevant early and recent papers. We refrain from presenting many molecular details, and therefore we refer to the following more recent reviews (DeGrip and Rothschild, 2000; Hofmann, 2000; Spudich et al., 2000; Hofmann et al., 2009; Yizhar et al., 2011; Palczewski and Orban, 2013; Ernst et al., 2014; Imamoto and Shichida, 2014; Inoue et al., 2014; Deisseroth, 2015; Hofmann and Palczewski, 2015; Brown and Ernst, 2017; Bando et al., 2019; El Khatib and Atamian, 2019; Dowling, 2020; Kandori, 2020; Kwon et al., 2020; Baillie et al., 2021; Moraes et al., 2021; Rozenberg et al., 2021; Bondar, 2022; Broser, 2022; Brown, 2022; Khelashvili and Menon, 2022; Nagata and Inoue, 2022).

This review presents a historical perspective and is therefore organized according to the landmark discoveries or progress in the field. In the following sections, we first discuss milestone studies and the common elements of the type-2 and type-1 rhodopsins, followed by individual subsections presenting typical elements for the type-2 and type-1 family, respectively. For the interested reader, we have compiled additional relevant citations in tables accompanying every section.

Discovery

The discovery and identification of rhodopsins was governed by their spectral properties. Since they all absorb photons in the visible spectrum, careful visual observations were the cornerstone for these early studies.

Type-2 Family

Rhodopsin, the founding father of the type-2 family was first identified as the visual pigment of the rod photoreceptor cell. In the 19th century, groundbreaking research on vision by Müller, Boll and Kühne led to the visual perception, that light capture occurred in the distal part of the human retina (Figure 2), in particular the outer segments of the photoreceptor cells (Müller, 1855; Boll, 1877; Ewald and Kühne, 1878). The typical red color of this tissue disappeared upon illumination, which was termed “bleaching,” and could to some extent be regenerated upon subsequent dark adaptation of the isolated eyecup. As of the 1930s it became apparent that a membrane-bound protein in the rod photoreceptor cell was responsible for the red color (Tansley, 1931; Bliss, 1948; Wald, 1953). This protein was named rhodopsin, after the ancient Greek words ροδεοσ (rhodeos, rose-coloured) and οψισ (opsis, which appropriately can be translated as sight or eyes). It was found to owe its spectral properties to a covalently bound cofactor, eventually named retinal (Wald, 1935, 1953, 1968; Hubbard et al., 1971). Subsequently, it was discovered that the cone photoreceptors in the vertebrate retina harboured closely related visual pigments (Morton and Pitt, 1957; Dartnall, 1962c; Mustafi et al., 2009). Thereafter, it became known that the invertebrate retina applied structurally very similar, but photochemically slightly differently operating visual pigments (Hara et al., 1967; Suzuki et al., 1993; Gärtner, 2000). Similar “bi-stable” pigments in fact are also active in the vertebrate retina, like the well-known melanopsins (Provencio et al., 1998; Kumbalasiri and Provencio, 2005). Another highlight was the growing insight that the visual pigments form part of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (Kühn, 1984; Hargrave and McDowell, 1992; Palczewski and Orban, 2013). As a matter of fact, rhodopsin is the cornerstone of the major subfamily in this widespread receptor family.

FIGURE 2

Type-1 Family

In the early 1970s, fascinated by the dark-purple colonies of the salt lake thriving archaeon Halobacterium salinarum, Oesterhelt reported the surprising discovery that an intrinsic membrane protein was dominating purple patches in the cellular membrane of this archaeon and also harboured retinal as the chromophoric cofactor (Oesterhelt and Stoeckenius, 1971; Oesterhelt and Hess, 1973). At that time archaea were considered a subfamily of bacteria, and Oesterhelt coined the name bacteriorhodopsin (BR). Surprisingly, it was discovered that bacteriorhodopsin functions as a light-driven outward-directed proton pump, creating a proton-motive force enabling the cellular ATP-synthase complex to supply the cell with metabolic energy in the form of ATP (Oesterhelt et al., 1991). While bacteriorhodopsin is the dominant photoreceptor in Halobacterium salinarum, this archaeon eventually turned out to harbour several related photosensitive proteins, both with ion transport and sensory functions (Oesterhelt, 1998). Since the 1990s this field exploded, with more strains, including eukaryotic organisms like algae and fungi, and other functionalities being revealed every year (Béjà et al., 2000; Spudich et al., 2000; Brown, 2004; Rozenberg et al., 2021; Broser, 2022; Nagata and Inoue, 2022). More recently even viral rhodopsins have been discovered (Philosof and Béjà, 2013; Bratanov et al., 2019; Zabelskii et al., 2020). The overall structure and photochemistry of these pigments are very similar, and they are now considered to be a primary factor in marine phototrophy and solar energy conversion (Kirchman and Hanson, 2013; Gómez-Consarnau et al., 2019).

Spectral and Structural Properties, and Solubilization

The spectral properties of all rhodopsins were discovered by visual observation, thanks to their absorbance of photons in the visible spectrum (350–750 nm). Accurate recording of their absorbance spectra was complicated in the spectrophotometers available at that time, due to the intense scattering of light by the rhodopsin containing membrane fragments isolated from host cells. Strong chemical reagents or alkaline conditions could dissolve these fragments, but with concomitant denaturation of the proteins and loss of their native spectral properties (bleaching). In the 1950s synthetic surface-active agents, termed detergents, became available, that were able to solubilize these membrane proteins in smaller mixed detergent-lipid-protein micelles, which strongly reduced light scattering (Hallett et al., 1991). Strong detergents like SDS still led to denaturation and release of retinal, but milder detergents were developed to avoid rapid partial unfolding at lab temperature or below. Accurate recording of absorbance spectra could then be established in detergent solutions. If some scattering still remained, or other visible light material interfered, difference spectroscopy was established by recording spectra before and after illumination in the presence of hydroxylamine and taking a difference spectrum. Hydroxylamine captures the released retinal as retinaloxime, which absorbs outside the main absorbance band of most rhodopsins (Wald and Brown, 1953; Hubbard et al., 1971; Kropf, 1975). This usually provides an accurate profile of the main absorbance band or at least the absorbance maximum. (Figure 3). A more recent and elegant approach is to insert a membrane protein into small nanodiscs (Civjan et al., 2003; Borch and Hamann, 2009; Ritchie et al., 2009) (Figure 4). This also strongly reduces light scattering and has the important advantage of embedding the protein in the more stabilizing lipid bilayer environment (Banerjee et al., 2008; Tsukamoto et al., 2011; Zhou and Cross, 2013; Ganapathy et al., 2020). Nanodiscs can be generated using either lipoproteins and membrane scaffold protein derivatives (MSPs) or small synthetic polymers of the amphipol or styrene-maleic acid copolymer family (SMAs) (Knowles et al., 2009; Popot et al., 2011; Hoi et al., 2021). For MSPs usually a brief detergent solubilization step is still required, while SMAs can extract the protein directly from the membrane, but have a smaller pH-profile (Shirzad-Wasei et al., 2015; Dörr et al., 2016; Kopf et al., 2020; Ueta et al., 2020).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 4

The spectral profile of rhodopsins in the visible and near-UV region is very similar (Figure 3). It consists of the most red-shifted main absorbance band or α-band, a smaller β-band, both originating in the bound retinal, and the γ-band near 280 nm, that largely originates in the aromatic residues of the protein part termed “opsin.” In all rhodopsins retinal is covalently linked to a lysine residue in the seventh transmembrane segment (TM7) via a Schiff base (Figure 1) which is mostly protonated. The α-band is strongly red-shifted from the absorbance band of free retinal (maximum around 380 nm). This unusual polar grouping in the middle of a membrane protein is stabilized by the negatively charged “counterion complex,” containing one, two or occasionally three protein residues (mostly Glu/Asp, sometimes Lys or in anion pumps a Cl⁻ ion) in a H-bonded network with nearby residues and bound water molecules (Lanyi, 2004; Ernst et al., 2014; Gerwert et al., 2014; Nomura et al., 2018). Thus, the excitation energy in this retinylidene moiety is strongly reduced, compared to free retinal, which results in a red-shift of the absorbance profile. The magnitude of the red-shift strongly depends on the structure of the H-bonded network and counterion complex involving variable electrostatic interactions with the protonated Schiff base and to a lesser extent on the properties of protein residues in the opsin binding pocket (Lesca et al., 2018; Nikolaev et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2021; Shtyrov et al., 2021; Church et al., 2022a). By modifying these elements Nature created the spectacular broad variance in the spectral profile of rhodopsins, allowing them to cover the entire visible region.

The three-dimensional (3-D) structure of rhodopsins has been extensively investigated by classical electron diffraction on 2-D crystals and X-ray crystallography on large 3-D crystals, by solid-state NMR spectroscopy on membrane fragments and more recently by X-ray free electron lasers (XFEL) on small crystals (Schertler and Hargrave, 1995; Palczewski, 2012; Ladizhansky, 2017; Smith, 2021). Cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) has been traditionally performed on micellar solutions, but has also evolved to include nanodiscs (Maeda et al., 1991; Bertazolli-Filho et al., 2001; Hasegawa et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2019; Zhang M. et al., 2021). Only solid-state NMR can be directly applied to membrane suspensions, but overall, there is quite good agreement between the various approaches. The overall structure is quite similar for all rhodopsin families, with the main scaffold consisting of seven closely packed transmembrane α-helices, which creates a tightly fitting binding pocket lined by a lysine residue to covalently bind retinal (Figure 2). The protein N- and C-terminal stretch reside at the extracellular and intracellular side of the membrane, respectively, except for the heliorhodopsin family where this sidedness is reverted (Pushkarev et al., 2018). However, the packing of the α-helices, the size of the loops connecting the α-helices and of the N-terminal and C-terminal stretches outside the membrane differ significantly between the type-1 and type-2 families.

Type-2 Family

Most type-2 rhodopsins, and in particular cone visual pigments and invertebrate pigments are very sensitive to at least partial denaturation upon solubilization in detergent solution (Bliss, 1948; Kropf, 1982; Okano et al., 1989). While commercial detergents like Triton X-100, CTAB, LDAO and Emulphogene BC-720 could dissolve the vertebrate rod pigment rhodopsin into mixed micelles with none or only very slow loss of spectral properties at room temperature, for most other pigments only the very mild agent digitonin could be applied (Tansley, 1931; Knudsen and Hubbell, 1978; Okano et al., 1989; Hofmann and Palczewski, 2015). This natural compound, a steroidal glycone extracted from Digitalis purpurea, however has the disadvantage that its commercial preparations were quite expensive and did vary in composition and aqueous solubility (Bridges, 1977). Major progress was attained in the 1970s upon development of the alkylsaccharide detergents 1-O-n-β-D-octylglucoside (octylglucoside, OG), nonylglucoside (NG) and dodecylmaltoside (DDM) (Stubbs et al., 1976; DeGrip and Bovee-Geurts, 1979). DDM in particular turned out to maintain thermal stability and spectral and photochemical properties of rhodopsin almost as well as digitonin (DeGrip, 1982; VanAken et al., 1986). Additionally, DDM is well accessible and affordable through organic synthesis, and has therefore become the most popular detergent in the membrane protein field. Also, in case a protein purified in DDM needs to be reconstituted in a lipid bilayer for certain applications (nanodisc or proteoliposome, Figure 4), DDM can be easily extracted via cyclodextrin inclusion (DeGrip et al., 1998). More recently, a large number of novel detergents based upon the structural principle of DDM have been developed, some of which provide better thermal stability or better crystallization conditions for selected membrane proteins than DDM, but all requiring more complex synthesis (Hussain et al., 2016; Nguyen et al., 2018; Ehsan et al., 2020; Urner et al., 2020).

The absorbance band profiles of type-2 rhodopsins are quite similar (Figure 3), but the position of the α-band varies strongly for the visual pigments. The vertebrate rod photoreceptor pigment rhodopsin has quite a broad range in its absorbance maximum (Rh1 subset, 440–520 nm), with fresh-water animals slightly red-shifted and marine animals blue-shifted depending on the depth of their habitat (Locket, 1977; Luk et al., 2016; Musilova et al., 2019). Vertebrate cone pigments cover the entire visible spectrum, and can be divided into four subsets, the long-wavelength (LWS, absorbance maximum range 520–640 nm), green (Rh2, 460–530 nm), blue (SWS2, 400–470 nm), and UV (SWS1, 350–450 nm) sensitive pigments (Crescitelli, 1991; Yokoyama and Yokoyama, 2000; Imamoto and Shichida, 2014). This classification is not only based upon spectral sensitivity, but also upon sequence similarity (Nathans, 1987; Hunt and Collin, 2014; Jacobs, 2018; El Khatib and Atamian, 2019). Invertebrate visual pigments are more scattered over the visible region and can range from 340 nm up to 600 nm (Gärtner, 2000; Katz and Minke, 2009; Tsukamoto and Terakita, 2010). Non-visual animal rhodopsins are scattered over the 340–550 nm region (Leung and Montell, 2017; Pérez J. H. et al., 2019; Moraes et al., 2021).

The spectral properties of the type-2 rhodopsins depend on the 11-cis configuration of the retinylidene chromophore. Next to the standard retinal (retinal A1, Figure 1), several natural modifications occur (analogs). In fresh-water and coastal vertebrates 11-cis 3-dehydroretinal (retinal A2) has been observed (Figure 5) (Bridges, 1972; Yoshizawa, 1984; Imai et al., 1999). The longer conjugated chain red-shifts the absorbance maximum by 20–40 nm in rod pigments and up to 70 nm in cone pigments, as compared to retinal A1, to compensate for the lower blue light intensity in their habitat (Dartnall, 1962c; Hubbard et al., 1971). These “A2-rhodopsins” are also referred to as porphyropsins. In insects and some other invertebrates, 11-cis 3-hydroxy- and 4-hydroxyretinals have been detected (Figure 5) (Vogt and Kirschfeld, 1984; Matsui et al., 1988; Seki and Vogt, 1998). These modifications blue-shift the absorbance maximum by 20–40 nm, as compared to retinal A1 (Sekharan et al., 2011).

FIGURE 5

While such natural modifications are exploited to modulate the spectral position of a rhodopsin, the most effective approaches to shift the absorbance spectrum of the rhodopsin chromophore away from that of free retinal (380 nm) are protonation of the Schiff base and mutation of selected opsin residues lining the retinal binding pocket. For instance, only the Schiff base in UV absorbing rhodopsins, which absorb in the 350–380 nm region, is not protonated, while in all other classes it is protonated (Kusnetzow et al., 2004; Imamoto and Shichida, 2014). The large variation in the spectral properties in the latter classes is mainly due to the combined inductive effect of opsin binding pocket residues, in combination with H-bonding networks involving water molecules. On top of that, some vertebrate LWS visual pigments have developed a unique mutation (Glu197->His) creating a chloride binding site that effectuates a further 20–30 nm red-shift (Wang et al., 1993).

With respect to structural biology, bovine rod rhodopsin was a forerunner among all animal intrinsic membrane proteins, presenting the first detailed 3-D structure via X-ray crystallography in 2000, with many more to follow (Palczewski et al., 2000; Li et al., 2004; Okada et al., 2004). The seven transmembrane α-helical scaffold surrounding an accessible cofactor binding pocket proved to be the general motif for the entire G protein-coupled receptor family (Figure 6) (Sanchez-Reyes et al., 2017). This feat has stimulated advances in many other research fields, including drug design in the pharmaceutical sciences, study of protein structure-function correlations, and membrane protein-lipid interactions, both from experimental, theoretical and in-silico standpoints. Several natural factors concurred to enable this important step forward. First of all, rod rhodopsin is one of the few intrinsic membrane proteins that is available in relatively large quantities in domesticated animals, the most used being cattle (up to 1 mg of rhodopsin per eye), bullfrogs (up to 100 μg per eye) and chick (up to 100 μg LWS cone pigment per eye) (DeGrip et al., 1980; Toba and Hanawa, 1985; Yoshizawa and Kuwata, 1991). After enucleation and proper dark adaptation of the eyes, intact rod or cone outer segments (ROS or COS) can be easily isolated in a dark room under dim red light (>650 nm) that will not activate and bleach the pigment (Figure 3). Further, in dark-adapted ROS, rhodopsin makes up about 85% of the total protein content (DeGrip et al., 1980). Eventually, dark-adapted bovine retinae even became commercially available (Hormel Co., Austin, Minnesota, United States). Finally, bovine rod rhodopsin was found to be relatively resistant to destabilization by detergents as compared to most other visual pigments, allowing extensive purification. Likewise, it proved to be sufficiently stable in less mild but more crystal-production-favoring small detergents like OG and NG to facilitate crystallization trials (Palczewski et al., 2000; Park et al., 2008).

FIGURE 6

The bovine rhodopsin amino acid sequence was established thanks to heroic protein sequencing efforts (Abdulaev et al., 1982; Hargrave et al., 1983). Over time, sequence information became available more easily via genome mining and c-DNA-sequencing. Thus, it came out that most invertebrate visual pigments are similar in size to the vertebrate pigments (36–42 kD), but mollusc pigments are significantly larger (46–55 kD), because of the presence of a much longer C-terminal (Ovchinnikov et al., 1988b; Gärtner, 2000). This additional stretch is unique in having an insertion of up to eleven copies of a peculiar pentapeptide sequence (Pro-Pro-Gln-Gly-Tyr), which probably helps in immobilization of the protein in the microvillar membrane (Ryba et al., 1993; Gärtner, 2000). Longer C-terminal stretches are also found in non-visual rhodopsins. For instance, the VA-opsin and melanopsin family also show this feature, except that the pentapeptide insertion does not occur. Here the extra sequence probably has a function in complex regulation of signal processing and desensitization (Valdez-Lopez et al., 2020; Contreras et al., 2021). Some VA-opsins and melanopsins are even produced in two or more splicing isoforms, with longer and shorter C-terminals (Davies et al., 2010).

While squid provides fair quantities of visual pigment, the first complete 3-D crystal structures only became available since 2008, both because of the much lower stability of the pigments in detergent solution and since crystallization could only be achieved after proteolytic removal of most of the long C-terminal (Murakami and Kouyama, 2008; Shimamura et al., 2008). The overall fold of the seven-transmembrane α-helical scaffold is quite similar to bovine rhodopsin, but the structure of the long C-terminal could not be determined, of course. The position of the retinal chromophore is slightly different, since the Glu residue functioning as the direct counterion for the protonated Schiff base is displaced from the site in the vertebrate pigments (Terakita et al., 2004). The first crystal structure of an arthropod rhodopsin (jumping spider) was only recently published in 2019, and again shows the familiar seven α-helical fold with overall high similarity with the squid structure (Varma et al., 2019). So far, crystal structures of non-visual rhodopsins have not been reported.

The crystal unit cell of bovine rod rhodopsin contains a dimer, but its interaction pattern is very different from the natural one (Fotiadis et al., 2006; Palczewski, 2006). In fact, rhodopsin is equally active as a monomer, and the organization in the ROS disc membranes is still debated (monomer, dimer, longer stretches?) (Fotiadis et al., 2004; Chabre and LeMaire, 2005; Mishra et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016; Feldman et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019). Invertebrate visual rhodopsins are probably rigidly immobilized in their native membrane, which allows to discern the polarization plane of the incoming light (Gärtner, 2000; Stavenga et al., 2000).

The crystal structures are essential to resolve the protein fold of the rhodopsins and have confirmed several conjectures of the binding pocket. Biochemical, vibrational (resonance Raman and FTIR spectroscopy) and solid-state NMR studies already produced very strong evidence that it indeed harboured the 11-cis configuration of retinal (Groenendijk et al., 1980; Mathies et al., 1987; Lugtenburg et al., 1988; DeGrip and Rothschild, 2000; Mathies and Lugtenburg, 2000). Surely enough, this configuration best fitted the non-protein electronic density in the binding pocket. The same is true for the covalent binding of retinal to a lysine residue, for which the above-mentioned techniques also already provided a wealth of evidence (Bownds, 1967; DeGrip et al., 1973; Creemers et al., 1999; Mathies and Lugtenburg, 2000). However, to firmly establish protonation of the Schiff base the resolution of the crystal structures is not high enough. Instead, the evidence produced by vibrational and NMR spectroscopy is very convincing and in fact was later underpinned by quantum-chemical computation (Palings et al., 1987; Herzfeld and Lansing, 2002; Gascón et al., 2005; Tastan et al., 2014).

Type-1 Family

The sensitivity to detergent action also varies strongly between microbial rhodopsins. For instance, while bacteriorhodopsin (BR) is quite stable in OG, Triton X-100 and dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) even as a monomer, the rhodopsin proton pump from the cyanobacterium Gloeobacter violaceus (GR) strongly prefers DDM and is very unstable in DPC (Dencher and Heyn, 1978; Brouillette et al., 1989; Ganapathy et al., 2020). In general, OG and DDM are the preferred agents for solubilization of type-1 rhodopsins.

The spectral range of type-1 rhodopsins (360–690 nm) is comparable to that of type-2. There is less evidence for a clear relation to activity or habitat, an exception being the proton pump proteorhodopsin, which exhibits a blue-shift in deeper marine environments (Béjà et al., 2001; Bielawski et al., 2004). In a major distinction from type-2, microbial rhodopsins invariably exploit retinal A1 in the all-trans configuration as the basis for their light absorbance. Here, as well, a plethora of experimental evidence has demonstrated retinal binding to a lysine residue via a protonated Schiff base (Haupts et al., 1999).

Advanced angular electron diffraction studies on 2-D BR crystals in membrane patches already afforded a first glimpse into the organization of the helical transmembrane segments of type-1 rhodopsins (Henderson and Unwin, 1975; Mitra et al., 1993; Grigorieff et al., 1996; Heymann et al., 1997; Mitsuoka et al., 1999). The first 3-D crystal structures were reported for BR from 1997 onwards, and at a very high resolution slightly before that of bovine rhodopsin (Luecke et al., 1999; Pebay-Peyroula et al., 2000). This progress was aided by its high stability in detergent solutions and the relatively simple isolation from its native source. Bacteriorhodopsin is organized in large singular patches in the cellular membrane of Halobacterium salinarum, which can visually be observed and separated from other membrane fragments quite easily (Oesterhelt and Stoeckenius, 1971). In addition, type-1 rhodopsins complete a full photocycle (see below) and after photo-activation do not release the retinal, but thermally return to the ground state. This obviates the complexity of using dark rooms and shielding all experimental manipulations from room light exposure. Meanwhile, quite a number of crystal structures have been resolved for various classes of type-1 rhodopsins (Table 1). The most recent high resolution 3-D structures actually capitalized on the fantastic progress in cryo-EM (Hirschi et al., 2021; Kishi et al., 2022).

The available type-1 3-D structures show high similarity in protein fold and retinal pocket location. The basic seven α-helical transmembrane organization is comparable to that of type-2 (Figure 6), but for type-1 the helical packing is somewhat different and more compact. The loop segments connecting the helices are generally shorter and the retinal pocket is positioned differently to accommodate the longer all-trans chromophore instead of the curved 11-cis one (Figures 1, 6). Aspects of the binding pocket (retinal isomer and binding to a lysine residue via a Schiff base) again were in line with a wealth of evidence generated by biochemical and spectroscopic techniques (Lanyi, 2004). A recent XFEL study of the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle achieved a very high structural (ca 1.5 Å) and temporal (femtosecond) resolution and produced evidence for protonation of the Schiff base (Nogly et al., 2018). Also in the type-1 case the evidence generated by biophysical techniques like vibrational, EPR and NMR spectroscopy and by quantum-chemical computation is most convincing (Ernst et al., 2014; Brown and Ernst, 2017; Ryazantsev et al., 2019; Nagata and Inoue, 2022).

A conspicuous feature of most type-1 rhodopsins is that they organize in homo-oligomers, whether observed in the native membrane or in host cells. The most common arrangement for bacterial and archaeal rhodopsins are trimers or pentamers, though occasionally hexamers do occur as well (Hussain et al., 2015; Shibata et al., 2018; Kao et al., 2019). Circular dichroism spectroscopy provides evidence for exciton coupling between the chromophores (Cassim, 1992; Fujimoto and Inoue, 2020; Fujimoto, 2021). For eukaryotic type-1 rhodopsins, homo-dimeric as well as hetero-dimeric complexes are observed (Mukherjee et al., 2019; Govorunova et al., 2021; Broser, 2022). Isolated type-1 monomers are also functionally active, indicating that the oligomeric assembly probably affords optimal packing and mutual stabilization, and/or the opportunity to modulate monomer activity by inter-subunit interplay (Iizuka et al., 2019).

A novel feature was discovered in the enzyme-rhodopsins i.e. an additional transmembrane segment at the N-terminal (TM8), which functions as a connector with the cognate soluble enzyme domain and seems to be essential for modulating its activity (Ikuta et al., 2020; Tsunoda et al., 2021).

Interestingly, several thermostable microbial rhodopsins have been discovered. The crystal structure of the highly thermophilic rhodopsin (TR) from Thermus thermophilus was resolved to be very similar to that of the much less thermally stable xanthorhodopsin (XR) from Salinibacter ruber, including the binding crevice for the carotenoid antenna (Tsukamoto et al., 2016). Likewise, the crystal structure of the thermostable rhodopsin proton-pump from Rubrobacter xylanophilus (RxR) is very similar to that of bacteriorhodopsin (Hayashi et al., 2020). An unusually widely stable proton pump (pH, detergent, temperature), named Tara76 rhodopsin, was isolated from uncultured bacteria (Shim et al., 2021). Such data shed new light on the design options to increase thermal and environmental stability without a significant sacrifice in dynamics and activity (Hayashi et al., 2020).

Additional selected references relevant for this section have been compiled in Table 1.

Functional Diversity, Phylogeny

It was relatively simple in the old days. On one hand, we knew of animal rhodopsins, being G protein-coupled receptors, very nicely developed and evolved into a set of proteins allowing photopic vision (color discrimination) and a single class for extremely sensitive scotopic vision (black-and-white). On the other hand, another class of retinal-proteins had evolved in archaea to exploit solar energy for active transport of protons and chloride ions. However, with the awakening of the genome era, this view became totally obsolete. While the notion that the type-1 and type-2 families probably do not have a common ancestor and have little overlap in physiological function was consistent, over time many new members were discovered and their classification revised (Porter et al., 2012; Yee et al., 2013; Zabelskii et al., 2021). In hindsight, it was to be expected that ahead of the large carotenoid and chlorophyll dependent protein complexes in the photosynthetic reaction centers, Nature would have taken advantage of the abundance of solar energy making maximal use of this fantastic toolbox of retinal-proteins, that are relatively simply to bioproduce and adapt.

It is likely that many products of this toolbox are yet to be discovered, but already the genetic and functional diversity is so vast and complex, that we provide a very general overview below and mostly refer to selected reviews.

Type-2 Family

The animal rhodopsins have meanwhile been classified in at least nine gene families (Opn1–Opn9) and two separate sets with some members still awaiting further assignment (Table 2). Physiological function and tissue distribution show incredible diversity (Janssen et al., 2003; Leung and Montell, 2017; Liebert et al., 2021; Moraes et al., 2021; Calligaro et al., 2022). The classical visual pigments come within Opn1 (cone pigments) and Opn2 (rod pigments). Pigments discovered later in the vertebrate retina, such as melanopsin, VA-opsin or neuropsin, peropsin (RRH) and RGR fall under Opn4, unclassified and Opn5, respectively (Table 2). The common thread still is primary signal transduction via at least one of the available G-protein species (Gt, Go, Gi, Gq, and Gs), with cross-activation, modulation or desensitization via a variety of other mediators. However, RGR and its mollusc counterpart retinochrome are exceptional in this context, since they act as photo-isomerases, binding all-trans retinal in the dark state, and releasing 11-cis retinal after photo-activation as a supply for regeneration of visual opsins (Hara et al., 1967; Pepe and Cugnoli, 1992; Zhang et al., 2019; Choi et al., 2021; Vöcking et al., 2021). Another remarkable subset are Opn5L, peropsin and Opn7 members, which also bind all-trans retinal in the dark state, but that seems to be the active state binding the G protein. Upon illumination they generate the 11-cis chromophore, which represents the resting state that in the case of Opn5L members may even thermally revert to the active state (Nagata et al., 2018; Yamashita, 2020; Karapinar et al., 2021; Sakai et al., 2022). An even more surprising observation is that some type-2 pigments may be involved in recognizing temperature differences or mechanical changes, or function as chemosensors or tumorigenic elements, possibly even without requiring their retinal cofactor (Shen et al., 2011; Park et al., 2013; Baker et al., 2015; Pérez-Cerezales et al., 2015; Leung et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020; Córdova et al., 2021; Moraes et al., 2021).

Type-1 Family

Type-1 rhodopsins have been identified in archaea and eubacteria, including cyanobacteria, as well as in unicellular eukaryotes (algae, fungi, yeast) and more recently also in choanoflagellates and viruses (Lamarche et al., 2017; Bratanov et al., 2019; Zabelskii et al., 2020; Rozenberg et al., 2021; Govorunova et al., 2022b; Nagata and Inoue, 2022). Most of these pigments function as light-driven ion transporters or ion channels (Figure 7). The newly discovered xenorhodopsins and schizorhodopsins are exceptional as they perform inward-directed proton transport (Inoue et al., 2018; Inoue et al., 2020; Weissbecker et al., 2021; Brown, 2022). However, some type-1 rhodopsins display a photosensory function (sensory rhodopsins) and signal via a cognate transducer protein, which is totally different functionally and structurally from the animal G-proteins (Bogomolni and Spudich, 1991; Krah et al., 1994; Deininger et al., 1995). Overall, type-1 pigments are the dominant contributors to marine phototrophy (Casey et al., 2017; Larkum et al., 2018; Gómez-Consarnau et al., 2019). In addition, eukaryotic type-1 rhodopsins have been discovered which are intracellularly fused to an enzymatic domain and mediate light-driven enzyme activation (guanylyl cyclase, phosphodiesterase) or inhibition (guanylyl cyclase, based upon histidine kinase activity) (Avelar et al., 2014; Lamarche et al., 2017; Luck et al., 2019; Mukherjee et al., 2019; Tsunoda et al., 2021; Broser, 2022; Tian et al., 2022). These pigments have been termed as enzyme-rhodopsins.

FIGURE 7

The overall structure and photochemistry of all type-1 rhodopsins present a very similar pattern, though the sequence identity can be as low as 12%, and the kinetics of the photocycle can vary up to at least thousand-fold. The most recent addition, the heliorhodopsins, are not very different in their protein fold from e.g. BR in spite of a very low sequence identity (<10%) (Shihoya et al., 2019). Considering their inverted insertion into the membrane, very long photocycle and so far unknown functionality, they probably are better classified separately as type-3 rhodopsins (Tanaka et al., 2020; Chazan et al., 2022).

Heterologous Expression and Purification

The congruent broad heterogeneity in the rhodopsin superfamily offers a fascinating spectrum for mechanistic studies as well as biomimetic adaptation and application. However, mechanistic studies still require large quantities of relatively pure material (at least several mg). With the exception of some visual pigments and archaeal rhodopsins, such quantities are not available from native sources. Besides, purifying minor quantities of rhodopsins out of a large excess of cellular membrane proteins turned out to be a “hell of a job” (Dartnall, 1962b; Hubbard et al., 1971). Furthermore, in-depth mechanistic studies and biomimetic applications need the ability to make modifications biosynthetically at the protein residue level, and synthetically at the chromophore level. And even when in silico molecular dynamics and quantum chemical computation would have reached the time-scale of protein conformational changes (femtoseconds to seconds range) and the native accuracy, then still experimental verification is in order. Experimentally modifying rhodopsins in the native organism was completely out of hand at the time, except for some limited success with bacteriorhodopsin mutants in Halobacterium salinarum which still did not solve the quantity requirement (Krebs et al., 1993). Hence, the search for suitable heterologous expression hosts started in the 1980s, and over time it became obvious that the eukaryotic rhodopsins required quite a different perspective.

With the start of the genome era, recombinant DNA technology (genome mining, DNA and c-DNA sequence information and comparison, DNA sequence modification) became accessible and have now become common experimental tools (Khorana, 1979; Khorana et al., 1987). Likewise, total synthesis of retinal isomers and a plethora of derivatives has improved significantly (Dawadi and Lugtenburg, 2010; Liu and Liu, 2011; Álvarez et al., 2014; El-Tahawy et al., 2020).

Type-2 Family

Type-2 rhodopsins can undergo a variety of posttranslational modifications (disulfide-bridge formation, N- and O-glycosylation, methylation, acetylation, myristylation, palmitoylation, phosphorylation), most of which are not properly executed by the bacterial or archaeal biosynthetic machinery (Table 3). Expression of bovine rhodopsin in bacteria and even yeast did not yield promising results (Mollaaghababa et al., 1996; Abdulaev and Ridge, 2000). Hence, for optimal heterologous expression a eukaryotic cell type had to be selected as a host. Attempts have been made to express type-2 pigments and related receptors in the eye of whole organisms (mouse, Xenopus) and in Caenorhabditis elegans using viral vectors or transgenic animals, but this gave relatively low yields or even led to retinal degeneration (Zhang et al., 2005; Salom et al., 2008; Cao et al., 2012; Salom et al., 2012). Eventually, the best results with sufficient posttranslational modification and targeting to the plasma membrane were obtained in some mammalian cell lines using plasmid transfection (COS, HEK, Neuroblastoma cell lines), in insect cell lines using baculoviral infection (Spodoptera Sf9 and Sf12 and Trichoplusia “High-Five”) and in Xenopus oocytes (Oprian et al., 1987; Janssen et al., 1988; Khorana et al., 1988; Karnik et al., 1993; Kazmi et al., 1996). The highest expression levels of functional pigments, with addition of 11-cis retinal during culture or after isolation of the cells, were obtained in suspension culture of insect cells or specially adapted HEK293 cells, with yields up to 130 nmol/L, equivalent to ca 5 mg bovine rhodopsin per liter (Klaassen and DeGrip, 2000; Reeves et al., 2002). Even then the pigment accounts for maximally 5 percent of the total cellular membrane protein, and further purification is inevitable. Eventually, gene manipulation lent a helping hand and it has now become common practice to add a small sequence tag to the pigment c-DNA, encoding a short peptide sequence to easily identify and purify the expressed pigment. Two approaches have become the most popular in the type-2 rhodopsin field. One exploited the availability of a monoclonal antibody against the C-terminal octapeptide of bovine rhodopsin (Molday, 1989). This allows for highly selective immuno-affinity purification using a suitable detergent like DDM for solubilization (Ridge et al., 1995). By adding to or replacing the native C-terminal with this octapeptide, the resulting tagged protein can be comfortably isolated. The second approach involved extending the C-terminal with six to ten histidine residues (His6-tag to His10-tag), which upon solubilization with a suitable detergent allows metal affinity purification over a matrix containing immobilized Ni²⁺ or Co²⁺ complexes (Janknecht et al., 1991; Janssen et al., 1995). Both approaches are very effective with hardly any perturbation of expression level and functionality of the pigment (Reeves et al., 1999; Bosman et al., 2003). Nevertheless, if necessary, a short target peptide sequence for a selective proteolytic enzyme can be introduced in front of the purification tag to remove it after purification (Sarramegna et al., 2006). Most Opn1 and Opn2 pigments can be satisfactorily purified by either procedure (Vissers and DeGrip, 1996; Shirzad-Wasei and DeGrip, 2016; Katayama et al., 2017; Katayama et al., 2019). Some pigments from the other subsets have been difficult to solubilize or are too unstable in detergent solution to survive purification. The alternative option then is to transfer the protein into the stabilizing lipid environment of nanodiscs (Figure 4), which requires hardly any detergent (amphipol or SMA-type) or very brief exposure to a suitable mild detergent (MSP-type). Exploiting the sequence tag on the incorporated protein, the protein-nanodisc unit is then easily purified again by affinity chromatography (Shirzad-Wasei et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2017; Ganapathy et al., 2020).

The opportunity to modify, bio-generate and purify type-2 pigments in sufficient quantities has given a tremendous boost to all mechanistic and functional studies. Analysis of the native proteins or binding pocket mutants, often in combination with ²H-, ¹³C- or F-labeling and/or chemical modification of retinal and/or with ¹⁵N- and/or ¹³C-labeling of protein residues or inserting modified amino acids, has provided a wealth of data, underpinning, extending and refining the information obtained from crystal structures (see next sections). Groundbreaking details of dark state structures have been excavated by biochemical (e.g. limited proteolysis, selective chemical modification, selective deuteration, atomic force microscopy, cryo-EM) and biophysical studies (e.g. FTIR and resonance Raman spectroscopy, solid-state NMR spectroscopy, EPR spectroscopy) (Table 3). This also fueled a large body of theoretical and in-silico efforts (molecular dynamics, quantum-chemical calculation and modeling) (Ryazantsev et al., 2019; Pedraza-González et al., 2020; Fujimoto, 2021; Mroginski et al., 2021; Church et al., 2022b). As a result of all these exertions, it has already been possible to construct a highly detailed picture of the dark state of bovine rhodopsin.

Type-1 Family

For the archaeal and bacterial type-1 rhodopsins, a heterologous expression host was more easily identified. Escherichia coli strains had already been developed for uncomplicated suspension culture, high productivity, low proteolytic activity and easy transformation. Plasmids with inducible promoters became available, and were further engineered with specific features, like producing the necessary enzymatic machinery to generate all-trans retinal from its precursor β-carotene (Kim et al., 2008). Nevertheless, in most cases just supplementing the cell culture with all-trans retinal together with inducing opsin expression or even after membrane isolation was sufficient to produce the full equivalent of the corresponding rhodopsin (Spudich et al., 2000; Ganapathy et al., 2015). In this way yields up to 20 mg/L have been reported (Ganapathy et al., 2015; Song et al., 2020). For some archaeal pigments, this straightforward approach only gave low yields and had to be adapted e.g. for bacteriorhodopsin itself (Bratanov et al., 2015; Tu et al., 2018). On the other hand, heterologous expression was more problematic for the eukaryotic type-1 rhodopsins, again because of their more complex posttranslational modification profile. Channelrhodopsins are commonly produced in yeast (Pichia pistoris), but successful production of eukaryotic type-1 pigments in insect and mammalian cell lines, Caenorhabditis elegans and Xenopus oocytes is also reported (Nagel et al., 2003; Bruun et al., 2015; Govorunova et al., 2017). An interesting new approach is using the trypanosome Leishmania tarentolae for over-expression (Volkov et al., 2017). For optogenetic applications (see below), functional production and targeting in a mammalian context is imperative, and often requires insertion of trafficking or targeting signals and/or sequence optimization to mammalian genetic code preferences.

The C-terminal His-tag has become the most popular option for purification of archaeal and eubacterial rhodopsins. For eukaryotic type-1 rhodopsins, several tags are used, including the His-tag, although the latter may sometimes interfere with particular electrophysiological or enzymatic analyses (Govorunova et al., 2021; Rozenberg et al., 2021; Tsunoda et al., 2021; Govorunova et al., 2022b).

Thanks to the powerful combination of the recombinant DNA toolbox with heterologous expression and purification making sufficient protein material available, an astounding repertoire of structural and functional data has also become available for the type-1 rhodopsins (Table 3). As a result, bacteriorhodopsin has become the best studied and fathomed membrane protein, with unprecedented insight into its structure and function (Ernst et al., 2014; Larkum et al., 2018; Nogly et al., 2018; Weinert et al., 2019). Next to that, the type-1 community has delivered prospects for a wealth of biotechnological and biomimical applications, far beyond any prognosis (see below).

Photochemical Properties

The initial rapid steps after photoactivation of type-1 and type-2 rhodopsins are quite comparable (Figure 8). Ultrafast photoisomerization of the chromophore leads to the first stable photoproduct within ps. This conversion is extremely efficient with quantum yields between 0.6 and 0.7 for type-2 pigments and varying between 0.3 and 0.7 for type-1 pigments and very low energy loss through fluorescence (Gozem et al., 2017). Often, this red-shifted photoproduct then thermally relaxes via spectrally distinguishable photo-intermediates within ms to a blue-shifted M(eta) intermediate, where the chromophore-binding Schiff base has become deprotonated through transfer of the proton to the direct counterion (Nakagawa et al., 1999; Hofmann, 2000; Tsukamoto and Terakita, 2010; Ernst et al., 2014; Govorunova et al., 2017). This explains the large blue-shift. In some type-1 pigments, a deprotonated M state is not formed, however a protonated L-like equivalent is observed (Spudich et al., 2014; Govorunova et al., 2017; Engelhard et al., 2018). The M or its L-like equivalent intermediate is the active state of the pigment, where the conformational changes in the protein evoke the subsequent cognate activity (grouping with cognate G protein or transducer, opening up an ion channel or vectorial ion pathway, regulating the enzymatic domain, etc.) (Table 4). At the M or L-like stage the type-2 and type-1 pathways take completely different directions.

FIGURE 8

Type-2 Family

For the type-2 rhodopsins ultrarapid spectroscopy data are limited, and mainly available for Opn1, Opn2, and R-type pigments (Shichida et al., 1978; Shichida, 1990; Schoenlein et al., 1991; Vought et al., 2000; Imamoto and Shichida, 2014; Schnedermann et al., 2018). Generally speaking, two schemes have been identified: Monostable pigments eventually release all-trans retinal (all Opn1 and Opn2 rhodopsins, Figure 8A) following which the opsins require supplementation with retinal re-isomerized elsewhere to regenerate the original “dark” state. Bistable pigments (most other type-2 pigments investigated, Table 2) progress until a stable M-intermediate is reached (all-trans chromophore), that requires photo-isomerization to return to the original “dark” state (11-cis chromophore) (Figure 8B) (Hillman et al., 1983; Gärtner, 2000; Stavenga et al., 2000).

The photochemical profile of the monostable bovine rod rhodopsin has been explored in great detail. The native pigment and a variety of isotopically labeled and/or mutant pigments have been investigated by femtosecond optical spectroscopy and vibrational and NMR spectroscopy. These studies have revealed intimate details on the kinetics, conformational changes in the chromophore and surrounding H-bonded networks with constrained water molecules, protein-chromophore interplay and Schiff base (de)protonation (Table 4). Overall protein conformational changes have been elucidated by fluorescence, ESR and NMR spectroscopy and TR-WAXS (DeGrip et al., 1999; Kusnetzow et al., 2006; Alexiev and Farrens, 2014; Malmerberg et al., 2015; Van Eps et al., 2017; Smith, 2021). Crystal structures have been resolved for all photo-intermediates and present a broad structural basis (Table 4). The power of theoretical and quantum-chemical calculations has grown immensely, laying a strong foundation for electronic and energetic elements of the process, in particular (Schapiro et al., 2011; Gozem et al., 2017; Schnedermann et al., 2018; Agathangelou et al., 2021; Nikolaev et al., 2021).

A very effective combination of selectively labeled chromophore with femtosecond spectroscopy and advanced quantum chemical computation resolved many remaining issues in the photoisomerization process of bovine rhodopsin (Schnedermann et al., 2018). The global picture has arisen that after photo-excitation of the chromophore into the Franck-Condon state it rapidly relaxes along a barrierless trajectory on the potential surface to a minimal energy conical intersection (Figure 8D). Here, productive resonance of the electronic wave packet at the excited state potential surface with torsional and HOOP vibrational modes in the twisted C10-C13 segment of the 11-cis chromophore, can prime very effective cross-over to a ground state energy surface, generating a hot all-transoid state (photorhodopsin) within tens of fs (Johnson et al., 2015). This relaxes thermally in about 200 fs into the photoproduct bathorhodopsin, which contains a still highly twisted all-trans chromophore, but is stable below 130 K (Yoshizawa and Wald, 1963). In free retinal, photoexcitation results in formation of several isomers (predominantly all-trans, 13-cis, 9-cis, and 11-cis), but in rhodopsins this conversion is remarkably selective from 11-cis to all-trans. This is clearly facilitated by the constraints of the binding site and the twist in the C10-C13 segment of the chromophore (Bismuth et al., 2007; Weingart, 2007; Schnedermann et al., 2018).

At room temperature, the ca 35 kcal of excitation energy stored in bathorhodopsin (Cooper, 1979) drives further relaxation via several intermediates until the metarhodopsin IIa-IIb equilibrium is reached within ms. This relaxation process subtly rearranges chromophore, protein residues and H-bonded networks up to the metarhodopsin stage, where the Schiff base transfers its proton, the counterion and another Glu at the intracellular side of the protein become protonated and an interhelical activity switch reshuffles helical segments to open up binding residues for the G-protein (Hofmann, 2000; Vogel et al., 2007; Vogel et al., 2008; Pope et al., 2020). The chromophore is subsequently slowly released via hydrolysis of the Schiff base to generate the nearly inactive apoprotein opsin (Wald, 1953; Rothschild et al., 1987; Jastrzebska et al., 2011). In vivo the active state is rapidly inactivated through phosphorylation and arrestin binding, however, which blocks activation of the G protein (Ranganathan and Stevens, 1995).

The photochemical profile of other monostable pigments (human rod rhodopsin, several cone pigments) has been investigated to much less depth, but is quite comparable to the bovine rod pigment (Barry and Mathies, 1987; Kusnetzow et al., 2001; Hofmann and Palczewski, 2015; Kazmin et al., 2015). However, the kinetics differ somewhat. For instance, the investigated cone pigments show more rapid kinetics in most steps (Imai et al., 1997; Vissers et al., 1998; Chen et al., 2012; Sato et al., 2012). Ultra-violet absorbing cone pigments may be more complex, as photoisomerization is accompanied by protonation of the Schiff base (Kusnetzow et al., 2004; Mooney et al., 2012).

The photochemical profile of bistable pigments, investigated thus far (squid, octopus and some insect pigments), follow a scheme similar to the monostable pigments up through formation of the M-intermediate and with comparable kinetics (Figure 8B) (Gärtner, 2000; Stavenga et al., 2000; Vought et al., 2000; Murakami and Kouyama, 2015). It is reported that in cephalopods the M-intermediate in fact forms a pH-dependent equilibrium between a protonated (acid M) and a deprotonated state (alkaline M). This involves the Schiff base of the chromophore, and the alkaline M is strongly blue-shifted (Liang et al., 1994; Vought et al., 2000). Photo-reisomerization of the M state to the original “dark” state is again quite efficient with a quantum yield around 0.4 (Stavenga et al., 2000).

Type-1 Family

The “dark” state of type-1 pigments contains a chromophore with the all-trans, 15-syn configuration (Figure 1). Rapid spectroscopy has been performed on quite a number of type-1 pigments, and the global scheme is quite similar to that of bacteriorhodopsin (Figure 8C). However, the kinetics of the slower steps (M and subsequent ones) and thereby the overall cycle time can vary considerably from ms up to minutes (Rozenberg et al., 2021; Tsunoda et al., 2021; Broser, 2022; Nagata and Inoue, 2022).

Out of all rhodopsins the photochemistry of BR is understood in most detail (Wickstrand et al., 2015; Nango et al., 2016). Femtosecond XFEL crystallography has even revealed very early responses to photoexcitation of the chromophore (Nogly et al., 2018). The adjacent protein residues and water molecules already react to the charge delocalization in the excited chromophore before the isomerization is initiated (Tahara et al., 2019a). During the isomerization process more of the protein environment becomes involved while the chromophore rapidly relaxes along a 2-state trajectory on the excited state potential surface to a conical intersection, where it effectively crosses in ca 500 fs over to a ground state energy surface into a “hot” transient hybrid state (J) and then relaxes thermally in about 3 ps into the photoproduct K, which contains a still significantly twisted 13-cis, 15-anti chromophore, but is stable below 150 K (Lanyi, 2004). Here, a major driving force is the elongation of the C13-C14 bond in the excited state in combination with electrostatic re-arrangement and weakening of the hydrated H-bonded network in the Schiff base region. At room temperature, the ca 15 kcal of excitation energy stored in K (this can be higher in sensory rhodopsins) (Birge et al., 1991; Govorunova et al., 2017; Rozenberg et al., 2021) drives further relaxation via the spectrally distinguishable L intermediate until the M states are reached in ca 50 µs. This relaxation process again subtly re-arranges chromophore, protein helices and H-bonded networks up to the M states, where the Schiff base transfers its proton via a water molecule to the counterion and the hydrated H-bonded network opens up a proton gateway to the extracellular membrane surface. The M-states thermally decay via several intermediates in tens of ms to the BR ground state, during which the Schiff base is reprotonated via proton transfer from residue Asp96, a proton is taken up from the intracellular surface and the chromophore is re-isomerized to the all-trans, 15-syn configuration. In fact, all-trans is the most stable configuration for free retinal (Ganapathy and Liu, 1992). Nevertheless, in some archaeal rhodopsins including BR the chromophore slowly enters an all-trans, 15-anti ↔ 13-cis, 15-syn equilibrium when stored in the dark (dark adaptation). The latter chromophore is photo-excited in the light and via a separate non-productive photocycle rerouted to the ground state BR (Smith et al., 1989; Oesterhelt et al., 1991). In channelrhodopsins the opposite phenomenon is observed, where prolonged illumination reduces the activity, since an equilibrium between pigments with an all-trans, 15-anti and a 13-cis, 15-syn chromophore configuration is generated (light-adaptation with partial desensitization) (Bruun et al., 2015; Kuhne et al., 2019; Rozenberg et al., 2021; Govorunova et al., 2022b).

Using serial synchrotron crystallography, the slower conformational changes from 5 to ca 40 ms were recorded in the BR photocycle and involve small α-helical rearrangements, chromophore re-isomerization and proton uptake, ending in formation of the ground state (Weinert et al., 2019). A very recent study using advanced high-resolution atomic force spectroscopy at the single-molecule level investigated the BR photocycle after M formation (Perrino et al., 2021). It was concluded that a cytoplasmic gate for proton uptake opens up at about 3 ms after photo-excitation lasting for about 14 ms. Surprisingly, this same study observes a “black-out period” of tens of ms before a recycled ground state can be photo-reactivated. This uncovers a very interesting new phenomenon reminiscent of comparable nonresponsive states in animal voltage-regulated channels (Armstrong, 1992). Meanwhile, XFEL studies have also been performed on other ion pumps and channels. A femtosecond XFEL study of the sodium-pumping rhodopsin from Krokinobacter eikastus (KR2) again observed photo-isomerization of the chromophore to start in the femtosecond range and completed within 2 ps (Skopintsev et al., 2020). Changes in the local structure of the binding site and early conformational changes in the protein backbone are observed in the early nanosecond range. Further subtle rearrangements result in Schiff base deprotonation in µs and in the early ms range a gate opens up and transient binding of a Na ⁺ ion in the vicinity of the Schiff base is observed with release within 20 ms. A femtosecond XFEL study of the chloride pump from the flavobacterium Nonlabens marinus follows the conformational adaptations between 1 and 100 ps after photo-excitation (Yun et al., 2021). It shows the final rearrangements of the chromophore to the 13-cis configuration within 50 ps, together with the dynamics of the hydrated H-bonded network and deformations in the local α-helical elements. Following chromophore isomerization the chloride ion first dissociates from the protonated Schiff base and then starts to diffuse away. Additional molecular details of the interactions and trajectory of the chloride ion are provided by recent ps up to ms studies using time-resolved serial crystallography in combination with spectral and theoretical analysis (Hosaka et al., 2022; Mous et al., 2022). An XFEL study of the channelrhodopsin chimera C1C2, that photochemically behaves like ChR1, investigated the photo-induced conformational changes from 1 µs to 4 ms (Oda et al., 2021). Photo-isomerization induces a kink in the chromophore structure, triggering shifts in the retinal binding lysine residue and TM7, starting at around 1 µs and increasing during formation of the M-state up to 4 ms. This induces small lateral shifts of the chromophore and in TM7 and TM3 at around 50 µs. It is postulated that these rearrangements forebode the subsequent opening of the gates in the cation channel pore, although these were not observed in the crystal. The XFEL and serial crystallography studies beautifully illustrate the powerful but subtle design and the broad potential of the photo-driven nanomachinery. Less detailed studies basically show a similar pattern (Table 4). Subtle differences in early kinetics and conformational adaptation in chromophore and adjacent protein elements following photo-excitation are observed in the ultrarapid studies. A cautious interpretation could be that the structure of the hydrated H-bonding network in the complex counterion is an important roadmap for the light-triggered protein activity, which also depends on the pKa of the direct counterion (Hontani et al., 2017b; Oda et al., 2021; Chang et al., 2022).

In this context it should be realized that crystal structures have their limitations (García-Nafría and Tate, 2020; Guo, 2020). Detergent exposure may affect elements of the protein structure, and the crystal will certainly constrain larger conformational alterations in the protein, which may occur in the slower phase of the photocycle (Weinert et al., 2019; Oda et al., 2021; Govorunova et al., 2022b). Hence, it would be preferable to study the slower photocycle phases with experimental approaches that can handle membrane-bound systems as shown in Figure 4, like time-resolved AFM, cryo-EM and vibrational spectroscopy.

The general scheme for the photocycle of BR (Figure 8C) also holds for other type-1 pigments, though the kinetics after M formation can vary significantly (Wand et al., 2013; Tahara et al., 2015; Han et al., 2020; Smitienko et al., 2021). The decay is much slower for sensory rhodopsins, enzyme-rhodopsins and heliorhodopsins, possibly since longer interaction with their cognate partner is required for regulated signal transduction. In fact, some sensory rhodopsins and enzyme-rhodopsins exhibit a bistable photocycle (Kawanabe et al., 2007; Broser et al., 2020) and proton transfer to the counterion may not occur (Bergo et al., 2006).

Bioengineering

This section samples the impressive expansion in the field of rhodopsins bioengineered by creative exploitation of their design principles. Often, similar strategies are utilized for both type-1 and type-2 pigments, and therefore they are clustered together in the following subsections.

Shifts in Spectral And/or Functional Properties

Chromophore

Very early on in the 1960s, it was realized that the beautiful design and versatility of rhodopsins could be studied and exploited by modifying the chromophore and changing the spectral properties (Blatz et al., 1969; Kropf et al., 1973). Since protein modeling was not really established at that time, this led to a surge of trial-and-error synthetic efforts to test a large number of retinal analogs on their ability to incorporate into the binding site and to modulate spectral and/or functional properties (Balogh-Nair and Nakanishi, 1982; Derguini and Nakanishi, 1986; Liu and Asato, 1990; Crouch et al., 2002). Initially, this was mainly performed on bovine rod rhodopsin and bacteriorhodopsin, which were easily isolated in sufficient quantities. In this way both bathochromic and hypsochromic spectral shifts up to ca 80 nm could be realized, frequently with retardation of photo-kinetics or total loss of function. For instance, using “locked” retinals (blocking functional photo-transformations) it was confirmed that the photo-isomerization process was essential for the functionality and that the ring-polyene chain connection was 6-s-cis in type-2 rhodopsins and 6-s-trans in type-1 pigments (Figure 1) (Crouch et al., 1984; Fukada et al., 1984; Harbinson et al., 1985; van der Steen et al., 1986; DeGrip et al., 1990; Bhattacharya et al., 1992a; Ganapathy et al., 2015). Also, the remarkable observation was made with bovine opsin, that next to the 11-cis and 9-cis retinal, also the 7-cis, 7, 9-dicis, and 7, 9, 13-tricis retinal isomers could form a functional pigment, inducing a 40–50 nm blue-shift but reducing thermostability (DeGrip et al., 1976; Liu et al., 1984). In general, it turned out that the bovine opsin binding pocket could better accommodate more voluminous modifications than the bacterio-opsin pocket, suggesting a more constrained character for the latter one. This was later validated in 3-D structures, but other type-1 pigments or photo-intermediates can be less selective (Popp et al., 1993; Inoue et al., 2012; Mori et al., 2013). New analogs are still frequently generated, in particular because recombinant production of mutated opsins modifies the binding pocket constraints. In addition, protein modeling has become more straightforward and for optogenetics larger spectral shifts and other functionalities like higher photosensitivity or higher fluorescence yields are in demand (see below).

Protein Joins In

Once recombinant DNA technology allowed the production of functional opsins in heterologous hosts, one could use this technology to adapt the intrinsic potential of opsins to one’s need and design. Combining synthetic retinal design with recombinant DNA opsin modification opened up a marvelous toolbox to investigate the structure and functional mechanism of rhodopsins as well as to probe new functionalities and applications. This trend is evolving more and more rapidly. Initially, binding site residues were modified to probe their contribution to the packing, stabilization and spectral tuning of the chromophore (Khorana et al., 1987; Sakmar et al., 1989; Nathans, 1992; Sakmar and Fahmy, 1995; Giesbers et al., 2007). A salient example is the accumulating evidence for type-1 pigments, that three positions around the retinal chromophore, corresponding to L93, P186 and Ala215 in BR, function as natural spectral-tuning modules that systematically shift the absorbance spectrum of the chromophore without affecting molecular function (Table 5). This further inspired detailed analysis with modified and/or labeled retinals (¹³C, ²H, F) and protein residues (¹³C, ¹⁵N, F, azido, spin labels) using fluorescence, vibrational, EPR and NMR spectroscopy (Table 5). This profited from as well as steered development of sophisticated theoretical and in-silico procedures, like DFT, QM/MM and molecular dynamics (Altun et al., 2008; Collette et al., 2018; Del Carmen Marín et al., 2019b; Dokukina et al., 2019; Pieri et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2020; Nikolaev et al., 2021; Scholz and Neugebauer, 2021; Shen et al., 2021; Pedraza-González et al., 2022). All these elements have already profoundly deepened our insight into the structure and mechanism of bovine rod rhodopsin and bacteriorhodopsin, the frontrunners of type-2 and -1, respectively. However, more members are following up. Some recent conspicuous examples are mentioned in the next section.

Conversion

The manipulations described in the previous subsection frequently revealed surprising conversions in activity profile, exemplifying the versatile design principle of the rhodopsins (Kaneko et al., 2017). An interesting example is presented by the Nonlabens marinus inward chloride pump NMR-3 and the Krokinobacter eikastus sodium exporter KR2 (Hosaka et al., 2016; Yun et al., 2020). With only 35% sequence identity, the crystal structures are remarkably similar, but the gating residues for Cl⁻ and Na⁺ are located at the opposite site of the membrane (Kato et al., 2015a; Hosaka et al., 2016; Kovalev et al., 2019; Yun et al., 2020). Another example is the huge mutagenesis effort that converted a thermophilic rhodopsin into the best thermally stable rhodopsin available to date, while retaining pump activity (Yasuda et al., 2022). On the other hand, selective mutations in the opsin could convert BR into an inward chloride pump, the sodium pump KR2 into a selective light-driven cation channel, the proton pumps Archaerhodopsin-3 (AR3) and Coccomyxa subellipsoidea rhodopsin (CsR) into light-driven proton channels, and the proton pump GR from Gloeobacter violaceus into a fluorescent chloride sensor (Sasaki et al., 1995; Brown et al., 1996; Inoue et al., 2015; 2016; Fudim et al., 2019; Vogt et al., 2019; Tutol et al., 2021). Alternatively, a cyanobacterial chloride pump could be converted into a proton pump (Hasemi et al., 2016; Kikukawa, 2021). Novel retinal A1 and A2 analogs with an elongated polyene chain (10 instead of 9 carbons) still could incorporate into the binding pocket of the ReaChR channelrhodopsin inducing red-shifts up to ca 30 nm (Okitsu et al., 2020). However, when tested upon AR3, one A2 analog induced a 41 nm blue-shift and again converted it into a light-driven proton channel (Takayama et al., 2018). Another novel retinal analog (MMAR, Figure 5.) smoothly incorporated into the binding pocket of the proton pump Green Proteorhodopsin (GPR), inducing a 47 nm red-shift, but when combined with a Phe →Ser mutation near the binding pocket, an unprecedented 200 nm red-shift was observed (Ganapathy et al., 2017). This retinal analog not only maintains some pump activity under near-infrared illumination (700–900 nm region; NIR), but also induces strong fluorescence emission in the NIR, probably emitted in the first picoseconds after excitation (Hontani et al., 2018; Mei et al., 2018; 2020). Proton-pumping rhodopsins in several eubacteria (XR, GR and TR) harbor a carotenoid derivative (salinixanthin) close enough to act as an antenna and transfer electronic excitation to the retinal (Balashov et al., 2010; Imasheva et al., 2011; Misra et al., 2019; Jana et al., 2020). This combination significantly broadens the spectral sensitivity of the rhodopsins for blue wavelengths, and the carotenoid binding option can also be introduced into other pigments (Anashkin et al., 2018). Attempts have also been made to generate chimeric pigments with combined functionality. The earliest example was a BR mutant containing loops of rod rhodopsin being able to weakly activate the G protein (Geiser et al., 2006). This concept in BR was further developed (Sasaki et al., 2014; Kaneko et al., 2017; Yoshida et al., 2017) and also found wider application in other rhodopsins (Kaneko et al., 2017). Chimeras could be produced between type-1 and type-2 pigments, often with shared properties and variable potential for G protein activation (Kojima et al., 1996; Geiser et al., 2006; Airan et al., 2009; Nakatsuma et al., 2011; Sasaki et al., 2014; Bedbrook et al., 2017a; Kaneko et al., 2017; Hickey et al., 2021). A remarkable example is that the C1C2 chimera could be crystallized and a high-resolution crystal structure obtained long before its “parent” channelrhodopsins ChR1 and ChR2, (Kato et al., 2012). In a sequel, new chimeric channelrhodopsins with better performance were generated using structure-guided recombination (Bedbrook et al., 2017a). The chimeric concept has also resulted in type-2 recombinants with variable success (Kojima et al., 1996; Giesbers et al., 2007; Hickey et al., 2021).

These selected examples, along with some more references collected in Table 5, already give an impression of the fabulous potential and prospects of the rhodopsin clan. The most impressive flux, however, is noticeable in the optogenetics field.

Optogenetics

Neuronal activity and circuitry are of the essence for multicellular life. Much effort is dedicated to studying activity regulation and circuitry in complex tissues like the brain. This used to be a highly challenging electrophysiological operation, requiring invasive electrodes and precise surgical location. Once it was realized, that rhodopsins could be properly expressed in animal tissues with genetic targeting to specific neurons using selective promoters, it became possible to monitor and regulate neuronal activity by light using endogenously expressed rhodopsins (Boyden et al., 2005). This led to an explosion of research activity in a new field, coined optogenetics (Deisseroth, 2010, 2015; Rost et al., 2017; Kandori, 2020; Friedman, 2021). Initially, only type-1 rhodopsins were considered, since ion fluxes can directly modulate neuronal activity. Also, all-trans retinal is intrinsically available in animal cells and type-1 pigments complete a full photocycle.

In a first breakthrough, a cation-selective channelrhodopsin originally identified in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii termed ChR2 (Nagel et al., 2003) was exploited. ChR2 was shown to elicit action potentials in cultured neurons upon illumination (Boyden et al., 2005; Cardin et al., 2010; Klapoetke et al., 2014; Berndt et al., 2016; Deisseroth and Hegemann, 2017). This domain rapidly expanded into ion pumps, which can activate or silence neuronal activity (Chow et al., 2010). Simultaneously, pigments were modified to change spectral range, increase current output, alter photo- and response kinetics, improve membrane targeting, etc. (Lin et al., 2013; Kushibiki et al., 2014; Kato et al., 2015b; Brinks et al., 2016; Govorunova et al., 2017; Cho et al., 2019; Krol et al., 2019; Kojima et al., 2020b; Gong et al., 2020). Eventually, enzyme-rhodopsins as well as bistable type-2 pigments also entered the field, being able to modulate cellular metabolic processes up to gene expression (Mukherjee et al., 2019; Karapinar et al., 2021; Mahn et al., 2021; Rodgers et al., 2021; Tsunoda et al., 2021; Vierock et al., 2021). Bistable type-1 and -2 pigments allow further control, since their activity is triggered by illumination, but ends near the M(eta) stage, which can be photoreversed by illumination in another spectral range (Sheves and Friedman, 1986; Koyanagi and Terakita, 2014; Mederos et al., 2019; Eickelbeck et al., 2020).

A second breakthrough came with the discovery that the intensity of the fluorescence emission of the proton pumps GPR and AR3, be it quite weak, is modulated by the membrane potential (Kralj et al., 2011; Saint Clair et al., 2012b; Kralj et al., 2012). This triggered another burst of research dedicated to improve the voltage sensing of these pumps (minimizing pump activity, shifting spectral range, improving quantum yield, voltage sensing potential, temporal resolution, etc.) by a range of technologies like directed and scanning mutagenesis, multidimensional directed evolution, library screening and machine learning (McIsaac et al., 2014; Engqvist et al., 2015; McIsaac et al., 2015; Abdelfattah et al., 2016; Karasuyama et al., 2018; Kojima et al., 2020a). This was initially mostly performed on AR3, generating a whole family of mutants with different response characteristics (Quasar1 to 3, pa-Quasar3, Novarch, Archon1 and 2, Arch-EEN, Quasar6, Somarchon to name a few) (Piatkevich et al., 2019; Chien et al., 2021). The fluorescence of these voltage sensors most likely originates in late-stage photo-intermediates (Maclaurin et al., 2013). The introduced mutations may even result in a complex bistable photo-equilibrium between a fluorescent and a non-fluorescent state (Mei et al., 2021; Penzkofer et al., 2021). Meanwhile a host of additional voltage sensors have been developed. Next to optimized rhodopsins and chimeric rhodopsin fusions, fusion proteins of light-sensitive opsin cores with other fluorophores, often GFP derivatives or synthetic dyes, and of other voltage sensors with fluorescent rhodopsins have become popular (Bando et al., 2019; Kannan et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2019; Berglund et al., 2020; Zhang X. M. et al., 2021).

Further control has been sought by combining optogenetics with classical electrophysiology (electro-optogenetics) or combining voltage sensors and neuronal activators and/or silencers both based on rhodopsins (all-optical electrophysiology) (Hochbaum et al., 2014; Afshar Saber et al., 2018; Sridharan et al., 2022). In the latter case, it is important to separate the spectral sensitivities to allow selective control and avoid optical cross-talk. In addition, much effort has been put into shifting the spectral range of the optogenetic tools and sensors as far as possible into the NIR, since NIR radiation penetrates much further into the mammalian brain (up to cm compared to several mm for e.g. blue-green light) (Larkum et al., 2018; Govorunova et al., 2020; Broser, 2022). For this purpose, mutagenesis of far-red absorbing rhodopsins like Crimson and CrimsonSA would be a good starting point (Oda et al., 2018). Another option is the novel channelrhodopsin ChRmine, which has quite unusual properties, including a trimeric structure similar to BR (Marshel et al., 2019; Kishi et al., 2022). A very fascinating example is NeoR, a subunit in the heterodimeric rhodopsin-cyclase from the fungus Rhizoclosmatium globosum. NeoR is quite exceptional, as it harbors three carboxyl residues near the chromophore and has an absorbance maximum at 690 nm with strong fluorescence emission at 707 nm (Broser, 2022). Other gateways could include special optical technologies or local NIR-converting nanoparticles and two-photon spectroscopy, which are more complicated (Sneskov et al., 2013; Chen, 2019; Matarèse et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2019; Adesnik and Abdeladim, 2021; Lehtinen et al., 2022), or designing special retinal analogs. The latter was quite successful, shifting absorbance maxima up to ca 750 nm with fluorescent emission around 800 nm using merocyanine analogs or MMAR (Figure 5) (Derguini et al., 1983; Hoischen et al., 1997; Liu and Asato, 2003; Herwig et al., 2017; Hontani et al., 2018; Mei et al., 2020). The strong red-shift in these analog chromophores, as well as in the A1 chromophore in NeoR is contributed to extensive delocalization of the positive charge from the protonated Schiff base over the polyene element (Figures 1, 5) (Liu and Asato, 2003; Lutnaes et al., 2004; Ganapathy et al., 2019; Broser, 2022). This will strongly reduce the energy gap between the ground and first excited state. Incorporation of retinal A2 into NeoR-opsin already effectuates a further 69 nm red-shift (Broser et al., 2020). Hence, it would be very interesting to investigate whether the combination of NeoR-opsin or mutants with bathochromic analogs like MMAR would even further red-shift the absorbance band and increase the gap with the emission band. Optogenetic application, however, requires invasive administration of the retinal analog and may need transient depletion of the endogenous A1.

So far, the field of optogenetics has progressed spectacularly, from neuron and brain slice cultures, up to intact animals including insects, C. elegans, mice and macaques (Bi et al., 2006; Flytzanis et al., 2014; Inagaki et al., 2014; AzimiHashemi et al., 2019; Babl et al., 2019; Piatkevich et al., 2019; Gong et al., 2020; Wagner et al., 2021; Wright et al., 2021) and is being extended to human disease models (Wright et al., 2017; Williams et al., 2019; Córdova et al., 2021; Fougère et al., 2021; Lindner et al., 2021). Future prospects will be touched upon in the next section.

Cell Factories

While rhodopsins drive important physiological processes in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and can contribute significantly to the energy requirement of their hosts, implementing this into biotechnological resources like cell factories has not yet developed very far (Walter et al., 2010). E. coli can profit from expression of a rhodopsin proton pump (Martinez et al., 2007; Choi et al., 2014; Na et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2017; Song et al., 2020). However, the extent to which this can for instance support production of useful consumables or commodity chemicals needs to be established. Cyanobacteria like Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 and Synechococcus already exploit chlorophyll-based oxidative photosynthesis to gather solar energy and are under intense investigation as cellular factories (Wijffels et al., 2013; Angermayr et al., 2015; Du et al., 2018; Knoot et al., 2018; Carpine et al., 2020). They do not have an endogenous opsin, but do produce all-trans retinal and can serve as a heterologous host for expression of rhodopsin proton pumps (Chen et al., 2016b; Chen et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2019a). Expression of these pumps was considered as a potential extra energy source, but the contribution of these pumps towards cellular energy production appeared to be limited (Chen et al., 2019b). This may be due to the metabolic constraint of proton fluxes, and/or to the chlorophylls and carotenoids absorbing much of the incoming radiation up to ca 650 nm (the PAR region). Attempts to express the GPR F234S mutant in combination with the retinal analog MMAR were successful in generating a proton pump absorbing in the 700–800 nm range, outside the PAR region. However, this still did not generate sufficient additional energy due to the lower pump activity of this mutant and failed to sustain bacterial growth under NIR illumination (Chen et al., 2018).

Prospects

A major asset of the rhodopsin family is the impressive versatility of the design principle: a relatively simple photosensitive ligand, constrained to allow selective photoisomerization with a high quantum yield, triggering subtle but effective conformational changes in the protein opening up specific binding sites or ion transport pathways.

Genome mining will undoubtedly discover new type-1 and type-2 or related variants, especially considering the still vast reservoir of unexplored microbial and invertebrate life forms. For instance, the apparent non-photic activity of (rhod)opsins in certain physiological conditions (thermo-, mechano- or chemo-sensing) may add a new chapter to this family saga (Leung and Montell, 2017; Katana et al., 2019; Baden et al., 2020; Fleming et al., 2020; Hasegawa et al., 2020; Mei et al., 2020; Zabelskii et al., 2021; Feuda et al., 2022). Next to that, insight into the effect of pathological mutations will become an ever more important asset in medical diagnostics and potential treatment. This has already been widely explored in the case of rod rhodopsin and retina-degenerative diseases, (Athanasiou et al., 2018). Expression and functional and structural characterization of new (rhod)opsins or mutants still involves an elaborate effort, but this may be considerably mitigated soon.

The phenomenal progress in artificial intelligence and machine learning already culminated in the design of software packages like RoseTTAFold and Alphafold, that are quite successful in predicting the protein fold from the primary sequence (Humphreys et al., 2021; Jumper et al., 2021). Considering the respectable number of crystal structures for type-1 pigments and G protein-coupled receptors already obtained, this in silico approach will be of invaluable help to close in on the 3-D structures of rhodopsin sequences identified to date, as well as those yet to be identified. A similar track is conceivable for the assessment of spectral and functional properties. Experimental analyses, in combination with in-silico techniques like DFT, machine learning and quantum-chemical computing already made big strides in establishing the contribution of individual opsin residues and water molecules to the spectral tuning of rhodopsins (Kato et al., 2015; Bedbrook et al., 2017b; Karasuyama et al., 2018; Bedbrook et al., 2019; Nikolaev et al., 2020; Inoue et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2022). However, this approach always requires 3-D information. It would be very desirable to build in additional functionalities, e.g. to predict an approximate absorbance maximum, into the sequence-to-structure software packages. This could then be easily expanded towards predicting the effect of mutations and the fit and effects of retinal derivatives or even more distant chromophores. Suggestions for functionality (specific pump or channel, enzymatic domains, thermal stability) probably could also be in reach, though mechanistic details (photoisomerization process, quantum yield of isomerization or fluorescence emission, early conformational changes) may be aiming too high.

Such developments will be a goldmine for optogenetics. Rapid prediction of spectral and functional properties and optimal targeting of desired mutants would be very valuable. Likewise, assessment of new constructs like chimeric pigments, fused monomers, oligomeric assemblies, enzyme activating pigments, new signaling partners and the like can be set up in silico and will require much less experimental justification (Sasaki et al., 2014; Abdelfattah et al., 2020). This would undoubtedly be accompanied by further physiological expansion of optogenetic tools. A wider spectral range of neuronal activity modulators and voltage sensors together with improved optics will increase the scope for (all)-optical electrophysiological characterization of neural circuitry, also lending insight into neuronal function (and dysfunction) in the brain (Villette et al., 2019; Guimarães Backhaus et al., 2021; Sharma et al., 2021; Zou et al., 2021; Prakash et al., 2022; Sridharan et al., 2022; Tan et al., 2022). Other important medical targets may also arise using optogenetics to correct physiological defects and address pathological conditions, where first steps have already been taken (Braun et al., 1995; Deubner et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2020; Acharya et al., 2021; Cokic et al., 2021; Kathe et al., 2021; Gilhooley et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022).

Several concepts to utilize rhodopsins in bioelectronic and biomimic nanotechnology have already been attempted, but did not yet really come to maturation (Khodonov et al., 2000; Kuang et al., 2014; Hirschi et al., 2019; Aprahamian, 2020; Shim et al., 2021). With the rapidly growing insight in the structural and mechanistic potential of the rhodopsin pigments, this is expected to change at short notice. So far, electro-optical phenomena have been investigated in 2D crystals, lipid films and other matrices (Oesterhelt et al., 1991; Miyasaka et al., 1992; Hong, 1994; Wagner et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2015; Ji et al., 2017; Gruber et al., 2022). With help of the above mentioned software packages, the design of specific constructs with high performance and stability under the system’s conditions will be facilitated.

This would also be the case for application in cell factories. The most interesting and rewarding application in this respect is the notion of “synergistic photosynthesis,” the combination of chlorophyll-based oxidative photosynthesis with retinal-based phototrophy, using high-performance rhodopsin proton pumps absorbing in the NIR (Chen et al., 2016a; Chen et al., 2019b). This will also require adaptation of proton regulation in the host cell or introduction of special cellular organelles containing the pump and an ATP-synthase. In eukaryotic cells like algae or fungi, targeting of a proton pump to mitochondria to increase ATP levels for production of commodity chemicals under selected conditions can be further developed (Hoffmann et al., 1994; Hara et al., 2013; Tkatch et al., 2017; Imai et al., 2019; Berry and Wojtovich, 2020). In general, designing highly active ion pumps absorbing in the 700–800 nm region, i.e. outside the PAR region, is essential for productive “synergistic photosynthesis.” Again, artificial intelligence can be a decisive factor here.

Epilogue

In roughly 10 years, the rhodopsin field has reached a century’s worth of experimental investigation. In this review, we have mainly touched upon the surface of the phenomenal development in this field, somewhat like molecular force microscopy. In the coming 10 years we expect its expansion to continue and to eventually require an at least ten-volume book series for full documentation. By that time, we will hopefully have a better understanding of how a selection of twenty amino acids can lead a membrane protein domain of 300–400 amino acids surrounding a small chromophoric group to such mechanistic versatility.

References

• 1

  Abdelfattah A. S. Farhi S. L. Zhao Y. Brinks D. Zou P. Ruangkittisakul A. et al (2016). A Bright and Fast Red Fluorescent Protein Voltage Indicator that Reports Neuronal Activity in Organotypic Brain Slices. J. Neurosci.36, 2458–2472. 10.1523/jneurosci.3484-15.2016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  Abdelfattah A. S. Valenti R. Zheng J. Wong A. Chuong A. S. Hasseman J. P. et al (2020). A General Approach to Engineer Positive-Going eFRET Voltage Indicators. Nat. Commun.11, 3444–34413448. 10.1038/s41467-020-17322-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  Abdulaev N. G. Artamonov I. D. Bogachuk A. S. Feigina M. Y. Kostina M. B. Kudelin A. B. et al (1982). Structure of Light-Activated Proteins - Visual Rhodopsin. Biochem. Int.5, 693–703.

  • Google Scholar

• 4

  Abdulaev N. G. Ridge K. D. (2000). Heterologous Expression of Bovine Opsin in Pichia pastoris. Meth. Enzymol.315, 3–11. 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)15831-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  Acharya A. R. Vandekerckhove B. Larsen L. E. Delbeke J. Wadman W. J. Vonck K. et al (2021). In Vivo blue Light Illumination for Optogenetic Inhibition: Effect on Local Temperature and Excitability of the Rat hippocampus. J. Neural Eng.18, 066038–066031. 10.1088/1741-2552/ac3ef4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Adesnik H. Abdeladim L. (2021). Probing Neural Codes with Two-Photon Holographic Optogenetics. Nat. Neurosci.24, 1356–1366. 10.1038/s41593-021-00902-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  Afshar Saber W. Gasparoli F. M. Dirks M. G. Gunn-Moore F. J. Antkowiak M. (2018). All-Optical Assay to Study Biological Neural Networks. Front. Neurosci.12, 451–451412. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00451

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  Agathangelou D. Orozco-Gonzalez Y. Del Carmen Marín M. Roy P. P. Brazard J. Kandori H. et al (2018). Effect of Point Mutations on the Ultrafast Photo-Isomerization of Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin. Faraday Discuss.in the press. 10.1039/c7fd00200a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  Agathangelou D. Roy P. P. Del Carmen Marín M. Ferré N. Olivucci M. Buckup T. et al (2021). Sub-picosecond C=C Bond Photo-Isomerization: Evidence for the Role of Excited State Mixing. Comptes Rendus Phys.22, 1–28. 10.5802/crphys.41

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  Aguilà M. Toledo D. Morillo M. Dominguez M. Vaz B. Álvarez R. et al (2009). Structural Coupling of 11-Cis-7-Methyl-Retinal and Amino Acids at the Ligand Binding Pocket of Rhodopsin. Photochem. Photobiol.85, 485–493. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00535.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  Airan R. D. Thompson K. R. Fenno L. E. Bernstein H. Deisseroth K. (2009). Temporally Precise In Vivo Control of Intracellular Signalling. Nature458, 1025–1029. 10.1038/nature07926

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  Alabugin A. (2019). Near-IR Photochemistry for Biology: Exploiting the Optical Window of Tissue. Photochem. Photobiol.95, 722–732. 10.1111/php.13068

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  Alexander N. S. Katayama K. Sun W. Y. Salom D. Gulati S. Zhang J. Y. et al (2017). Complex Binding Pathways Determine the Regeneration of Mammalian Green Cone Opsin with a Locked Retinal Analogue. J. Biol. Chem.292, 10983–10997. 10.1074/jbc.m117.780478

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  Alexiev U. Farrens D. L. (2014). Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Rhodopsins: Insights and Approaches. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 694–709. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.10.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  Alexiev U. Mollaaghababa R. Khorana H. G. Heyn M. P. (2000). Evidence for Long Range Allosteric Interactions between the Extracellular and Cytoplasmic Parts of Bacteriorhodopsin from the Mutant R82A and its Second Site Revertant R82A/G231C. J. Biol. Chem.275, 13431–13440. 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13431

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  Alexiev U. Rimke I. Pöhlmann T. (2003). Elucidation of the Nature of the Conformational Changes of the EF-Interhelical Loop in Bacteriorhodopsin and of the Helix VIII on the Cytoplasmic Surface of Bovine Rhodopsin: A Time-Resolved Fluorescence Depolarization Study. J. Mol. Biol.328, 705–719. 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00326-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  Alfonsa H. Lakey J. H. Lightowlers R. N. Trevelyan A. J. (2016). Cl-out Is a Novel Cooperative Optogenetic Tool for Extruding Chloride from Neurons. Nat. Commun.7, 13495–13499. 10.1038/ncomms13495

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  Altenbach C. A. Kusnetzow A. K. Ernst O. P. Hofmann K. P. Hubbell W. L. (2008). High-resolution Distance Mapping in Rhodopsin Reveals the Pattern of Helix Movement Due to Activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 7439–7444. 10.1073/pnas.0802515105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  Altun A. Yokoyama S. Morokuma K. (2008). Spectral Tuning in Visual Pigments: An ONIOM(QM : MM) Study on Bovine Rhodopsin and its Mutants. J. Phys. Chem. B112, 6814–6827. 10.1021/jp709730b

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  Álvarez R. Vaz B. Gronemeyer H. De Lera A. R. (2014). Functions, Therapeutic Applications, and Synthesis of Retinoids and Carotenoids. Chem. Rev.114, 1–125. 10.1021/cr400126u

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  Amsden J. J. Kralj J. M. Chieffo L. R. Wang X. H. Erramilli S. Spudich E. N. et al (2007). Subpicosecond Protein Backbone Changes Detected during the Green-Absorbing Proteorhodopsin Primary Photoreaction. J. Phys. Chem. B111, 11824–11831. 10.1021/jp073490r

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  Anashkin V. A. Bertsova Y. V. Mamedov A. M. Mamedov M. D. Arutyunyan A. M. Baykov A. A. et al (2018). Engineering a Carotenoid-Binding Site in Dokdonia Sp PRO95 Na⁺-Translocating Rhodopsin by a Single Amino Acid Substitution. Photosynth. Res.136, 161–169. 10.1007/s11120-017-0453-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  Angel T. E. Gupta S. Jastrzebska B. Palczewski K. Chance M. R. (2009). Structural Waters Define a Functional Channel Mediating Activation of the GPCR, Rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106, 14367–14372. 10.1073/pnas.0901074106

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  Angermayr S. A. Rovira A. G. Hellingwerf K. J. (2015). Metabolic Engineering of Cyanobacteria for the Synthesis of Commodity Products. Trends Biotechnol.33, 352–361. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  Aprahamian I. (2020). The Future of Molecular Machines. Acs Central Sci.6, 347–358. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00064

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  Armstrong C. M. (1992). Voltage-dependent Ion Channels and Their Gating. Physiol. Rev.72, S5–S13. 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.suppl_4.s5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  Arnaboldi M. Motto M. G. Tsujimoto K. Balogh-Nair V. Nakanishi K. (1979). Hydroretinals and Hydrorhodopsins. J. Am. Chem. Soc.101, 7082–7084. 10.1021/ja00517a059

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  Asenjo A. B. Rim J. Oprian D. D. (1994). Molecular Determinants of Human Red/green Color Discrimination. Neuron12, 1131–1138. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90320-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  Asido M. Kar R. K. Kriebel C. N. Braun M. Glaubitz C. Schapiro I. et al (2021). Transient Near-UV Absorption of the Light-Driven Sodium Pump Krokinobacter Eikastus Rhodopsin 2: A Spectroscopic Marker for Retinal Configuration. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 6284–6291. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01436

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  Astakhova L. A. Novoselov A. D. Ermolaeva M. E. Firsov M. L. Rotov A. Y. (2021). Phototransduction in Anuran Green Rods: Origins of Extra-sensitivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 13400. 10.3390/ijms222413400

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  Athanasiou D. Aguila M. Bellingham J. Li W. W. Mcculley C. Reeves P. J. et al (2018). The Molecular and Cellular Basis of Rhodopsin Retinitis Pigmentosa Reveals Potential Strategies for Therapy. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.62, 1–23. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.10.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  Avelar G. M. Schumacher R. I. Zaini P. A. Leonard G. Richards T. A. Gomes S. L. (2014). A Rhodopsin-Guanylyl Cyclase Gene Fusion Functions in Visual Perception in a Fungus. Curr. Biol.24, 1234–1240. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  Axford D. Judge P. J. Bada Juarez J. F. Kwan T. O. C. Birch J. Vinals J. et al (2022). Two States of a Light-Sensitive Membrane Protein Captured at Room Temperature Using Thin-Film Sample Mounts. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol.78, 52–58. 10.1107/s2059798321011220

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  Azadi-Chegeni F. Schiphorst C. Pandit A. (2018). In Vivo NMR as a Tool for Probing Molecular Structure and Dynamics in Intact Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii Cells. Photosynth. Res.135, 227–237. 10.1007/s11120-017-0412-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  Azimihashemi N. Bergs A. C. F. Schüler C. Scheiwe A. R. Costa W. S. Bach M. et al (2019). Rhodopsin-based Voltage Imaging Tools for Use in Muscles and Neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.116, 17051–17060. 10.1073/pnas.1902443116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  Azimihashemi N. Erbguth K. Vogt A. Riemensperger T. Rauch E. Woodmansee D. et al (2014). Synthetic Retinal Analogues Modify the Spectral and Kinetic Characteristics of Microbial Rhodopsin Optogenetic Tools. Nat. Commun.5, 5810. 10.1038/ncomms6810

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  Babl S. S. Rummell B. P. Sigurdsson T. (2019). The Spatial Extent of Optogenetic Silencing in Transgenic Mice Expressing Channelrhodopsin in Inhibitory Interneurons. Cell. Rep.29, 1381–1395. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  Bada Juarez J. F. Judge P. J. Adam S. Axford D. Vinals J. Birch J. et al (2021). Structures of the Archaerhodopsin-3 Transporter Reveal that Disordering of Internal Water Networks Underpins Receptor Sensitization. Nat. Commun.12, 629. 10.1038/s41467-020-20596-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  Baden T. Euler T. Berens P. (2020). Understanding the Retinal Basis of Vision across Species. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.21, 5–20. 10.1038/s41583-019-0242-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  Bagley K. A. Eisenstein L. Ebrey T. G. Tsuda M. (1989). A Comparative Study of the Infrared Difference Spectra for octopus and Bovine Rhodopsins and Their Bathorhodopsin Photointermediates. Biochemistry-USA28, 3366–3373. 10.1021/bi00434a036

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  Baillie J. S. Stoyek M. R. Quinn T. A. (2021). Seeing the Light: The Use of Zebrafish for Optogenetic Studies of the Heart. Front. physiology12, 748570. 10.3389/fphys.2021.748570

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  Baker G. E. De Grip W. J. Turton M. Wagner H.-J. Foster R. G. Douglas R. H. (2015). Light Sensitivity in a Vertebrate Mechanoreceptor?J. Exp. Biol.218, 2826–2829. 10.1242/jeb.125203

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  Balashov S. P. Imasheva E. S. Choi A. R. Jung K.-H. Liaaen-Jensen S. Lanyi J. K. (2010). Reconstitution of Gloeobacter Rhodopsin with Echinenone: Role of the 4-keto Group. Biochemistry49, 9792–9799. 10.1021/bi1014166

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  Balogh-Nair V. Nakanishi K. (1982). Synthetic Analogs of Retinal, Bacteriorhodopsin and Bovine Rhodopsin. Meth. Enzymol.88, 496–506. 10.1016/0076-6879(82)88067-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  Bamann C. Bamberg E. Wachtveitl J. Glaubitz C. (2014). Proteorhodopsin. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 614–625. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.09.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  Bando Y. Grimm C. Cornejo V. H. Yuste R. (2019). Genetic Voltage Indicators. BMC Biol.17, 71–7112. 10.1186/s12915-019-0682-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  Banerjee S. Huber T. Sakmar T. P. (2008). Rapid Incorporation of Functional Rhodopsin into Nanoscale Apolipoprotein Bound Bilayer (NABB) Particles. J. Mol. Biol.377, 1067–1081. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.066

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  Banskota S. Raguram A. Suh S. Du S. W. Davis J. R. Choi E. H. et al (2022). Engineered Virus-like Particles for Efficient Invivo Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins. Cell.185. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  Barry B. Mathies R. A. (1987). Raman Microscope Studies on the Primary Photochemistry of Vertebrate Visual Pigments with Absorption Maxima from 430 to 502 Nm. Biochemistry26, 59–64. 10.1021/bi00375a009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  Bayburt T. H. Grinkova Y. V. Sligar S. G. (2006). Assembly of Single Bacteriorhodopsin Trimers in Bilayer Nanodiscs. Archives Biochem. Biophysics450, 215–222. 10.1016/j.abb.2006.03.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  Bayburt T. H. Vishnivetskiy S. A. Mclean M. A. Morizumi T. Huang C.-C. Tesmer J. J. G. et al (2011). Monomeric Rhodopsin Is Sufficient for Normal Rhodopsin Kinase (GRK1) Phosphorylation and Arrestin-1 Binding. J. Biol. Chem.286, 1420–1428. 10.1074/jbc.m110.151043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  Bayraktar H. Fields A. P. Kralj J. M. Spudich J. L. Rothschild K. J. Cohen A. E. (2012). Ultrasensitive Measurements of Microbial Rhodopsin Photocycles Using Photochromic FRET. Photochem. Photobiol.88, 90–97. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.01011.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  Becker-Baldus J. Bamann C. Saxena K. Gustmann H. Brown L. J. Brown R. C. D. et al (2015). Enlightening the Photoactive Site of Channelrhodopsin-2 by DNP-Enhanced Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.112, 9896–9901. 10.1073/pnas.1507713112

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  Bedbrook C. N. Rice A. J. Yang K. K. Ding X. Z. Chen S. Y. Leproust E. M. et al (2017a). Structure-guided SCHEMA Recombination Generates Diverse Chimeric Channelrhodopsins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.114, E2624–E2633. 10.1073/pnas.1700269114

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  Bedbrook C. N. Yang K. K. Rice A. J. Gradinaru V. Arnold F. H. (2017b). Machine Learning to Design Integral Membrane Channelrhodopsins for Efficient Eukaryotic Expression and Plasma Membrane Localization. Plos Comput. Biol.13, 1005786. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005786

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  Bedbrook C. N. Yang K. K. Robinson J. E. Mackey E. D. Gradinaru V. Arnold F. H. (2019). Machine Learning-Guided Channelrhodopsin Engineering Enables Minimally Invasive Optogenetics. Nat. Methods16, 1176–1184. 10.1038/s41592-019-0583-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  Béjà O. Aravind L. Koonin E. V. Suzuki M. T. Hadd A. Nguyen L. P. et al (2000). Bacterial Rhodopsin: Evidence for a New Type of Phototrophy in the Sea. Science289, 1902–1906. 10.1126/science.289.5486.1902

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  Béjà O. Spudich E. N. Spudich J. L. Leclerc M. Delong E. F. (2001). Proteorhodopsin Phototrophy in the Ocean. Nature411, 786–789. 10.1038/35081051

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  Belrhali H. Nollert P. Royant A. Menzel C. Rosenbusch J. P. Landau E. M. et al (1999). Protein, Lipid and Water Organization in Bacteriorhodopsin Crystals: A Molecular View of the Purple Membrane at 1.9 Angstrom Resolution. Struct. Fold. Des.7, 909–917. 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80118-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  Bennett N. Michel-Villaz M. Kühn H. (1982). Light-induced Interaction between Rhodopsin and the GTP-Binding Protein: Metarhodopsin-II Is the Major Photoproduct Involved. Eur. J. Biochem.127, 97–103. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06842.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  Berglund K. Clissold K. Li H. F. E. Wen L. Park S. Y. Gleixner J. et al (2016). Luminopsins Integrate Opto- and Chemogenetics by Using Physical and Biological Light Sources for Opsin Activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113, E358–E367. 10.1073/pnas.1510899113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  Berglund K. Fernandez A. M. Gutekunst C. a. N. Hochgeschwender U. Gross R. E. (2020). Step-function Luminopsins for Bimodal Prolonged Neuromodulation. J. Neurosci. Res.98, 422–436. 10.1002/jnr.24424

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  Bergo V. B. Ntefidou M. Trivedi V. D. Amsden J. J. Kralj J. M. Rothschild K. J. et al (2006). Conformational Changes in the Photocycle of Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin - Absence Of the Schiff Base Counterion Protonation Signal. J. Biol. Chem.281, 15208–15214. 10.1074/jbc.m600033200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  Berndt A. Lee S. Y. Ramakrishnan C. Deisseroth K. (2014). Structure-Guided Transformation of Channelrhodopsin into a Light-Activated Chloride Channel. Science344, 420–424. 10.1126/science.1252367

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  Berndt A. Lee S. Y. Wietek J. Ramakrishnan C. Steinberg E. E. Rashid A. J. et al (2016). Structural Foundations of Optogenetics: Determinants of Channelrhodopsin Ion Selectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113, 822–829. 10.1073/pnas.1523341113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  Berry B. J. Wojtovich A. P. (2020). Mitochondrial Light Switches: Optogenetic Approaches to Control Metabolism. FEBS J.287, 4544–4556. 10.1111/febs.15424

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  Berry M. H. Holt A. Salari A. Veit J. Visel M. Levitz J. et al (2019). Restoration of High-Sensitivity and Adapting Vision with a Cone Opsin. Nat. Commun.10, 1221. 10.1038/s41467-019-09124-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  Bertazolli-Filho R. Ghosh S. Huang W. H. Wollmann G. Coca-Prados M. (2001). Molecular Evidence that Human Ocular Ciliary Epithelium Expresses Components Involved in Phototransduction. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun.284, 317–325. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4970

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  Besaw J. E. Ou W. L. Morizumi T. Eger B. T. Sanchez Vasquez J. D. Chu J. H. Y. et al (2020). The Crystal Structures of a Chloride-Pumping Microbial Rhodopsin and its Proton-Pumping Mutant Illuminate Proton Transfer Determinants. J. Biol. Chem.295, 14793–14804. 10.1074/jbc.ra120.014118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  Bhattacharya S. Hall S. E. Vaidehi N. (2008). Agonist-induced Conformational Changes in Bovine Rhodopsin: Insight into Activation of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors. J. Mol. Biol.382, 539–555. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.084

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  Bhattacharya S. S. Marti T. Otto H. Heyn M. P. Khorana H. G. (1992a). A Bacteriorhodopsin Analog Reconstituted with a Nonisomerizable 13-trans Retinal Derivative Displays Light Insensitivity. J. Biol. Chem.267, 6757–6762. 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50490-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  Bhattacharya S. S. Ridge K. D. Knox B. E. Khorana H. G. (1992b). Light-stable Rhodopsin. 1. A Rhodopsin Analog Reconstituted with a Nonisomerizable 11-cis Retinal Derivative. J. Biol. Chem.267, 6763–6769. 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50491-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  Bi A. D. Cui J. J. Ma Y.-P. Olshevskaya E. V. Pu M. L. Dizhoor A. M. et al (2006). Ectopic Expression of a Microbial-type Rhodopsin Restores Visual Responses in Mice with Photoreceptor Degeneration. Neuron50, 23–33. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.02.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  Bibow S. (2019). Opportunities and Challenges of Backbone, Sidechain, and RDC Experiments to Study Membrane Protein Dynamics in a Detergent-free Lipid Environment Using Solution State NMR. Front. Mol. Biosci.6, 103. 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00103

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  Bickelmann C. Morrow J. M. Du J. Schott R. K. Van Hazel I. Lim S. et al (2015). The Molecular Origin and Evolution of Dim-Light Vision in Mammals. Evolution69, 2995–3003. 10.1111/evo.12794

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  Bielawski J. P. Dunn K. A. Sabehi G. Béjà O. (2004). Darwinian Adaptation of Proteorhodopsin to Different Light Intensities in the Marine Environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101, 14824–14829. 10.1073/pnas.0403999101

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  Birge R. R. Cooper T. M. Lawrence A. F. Masthay M. B. Zhang C.-F. Zidovetzki R. (1991). Revised Assignment of Energy Storage in the Primary Photochemical Event in Bacteriorhodopsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc.113, 4327–4328. 10.1021/ja00011a043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  Bismuth O. Friedman N. Sheves M. Ruhman S. (2007). Photochemical Dynamics of All-Trans Retinal Protonated Schiff-Base in Solution: Excitation Wavelength Dependence. Chem. Phys.341, 267–275. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.06.052

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  Blackshaw S. Snyder S. H. (1999). Encephalopsin: A Novel Mammalian Extraretinal Opsin Discretely Localized in the Brain. J. Neurosci.19, 3681–3690. 10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-03681.1999

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  Blackshaw S. Snyder S. H. (1997). Parapinopsin, a Novel Catfish Opsin Localized to the Parapineal Organ, Defines a New Gene Family. J. Neurosci.17, 8083–8092. 10.1523/jneurosci.17-21-08083.1997

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  Blankenship E. Vahedi-Faridi A. Lodowski D. T. (2015). The High-Resolution Structure of Activated Opsin Reveals a Conserved Solvent Network in the Transmembrane Region Essential for Activation. Structure23, 2358–2364. 10.1016/j.str.2015.09.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  Blatz P. E. Lin M. Balasubramaniyan P. Balasubramaniyan V. Dewhurst P. B. (1969). A New Series of Synthetic Visual Pigments from Cattle Opsin and Homologs of Retinal. J. Am. Chem. Soc.91, 5930–5931. 10.1021/ja01049a069

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  Bliss A. F. (1948). The Absorption Spectra of Visual Purple of the Squid and its Bleaching Products. J. Biol. Chem.176, 563–569. 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52673-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  Bogomolni R. A. Spudich J. L. (1991). Archaebacterial Rhodopsins: Sensory and Energy Transducing Membrane Proteins. Mod. Cell. Biol.10, 233–255.

  • Google Scholar

• 85

  Boll F. (1877). Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Retina. Arch. Anat. Physiol.2, 175–286. 10.1007/BF02962033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  Bondar A.-N. (2022). Mechanisms of Long-Distance Allosteric Couplings in Proton-Binding Membrane Transporters. Adv. protein Chem. Struct. Biol.128, 199–239. 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2021.09.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  Borch J. Hamann T. (2009). The Nanodisc: A Novel Tool for Membrane Protein Studies. Biol. Chem.390, 805–814. 10.1515/BC.2009.091

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  Borgia A. Borgia M. B. Bugge K. Kissling V. M. Heidarsson P. O. Fernandes C. B. et al (2018). Extreme Disorder in an Ultrahigh-Affinity Protein Complex. Nature555, 61–66. 10.1038/nature25762

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  Bosman G. J. C. G. M. Vanoostrum J. Breikers G. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Klaassen C. H. W. DeGrip W. J. (2003). Functional Expression of His-Tagged Rhodopsin in Sf9 Insect Cells. Meth. Mol. Biol.228, 73–86. 10.1385/1-59259-400-X:73

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Fernández Fernández I. Liu R. S. H. Mathies R. A. Lugtenburg J. DeGrip W. J. (2009). Fluoro Derivatives of Retinal Illuminate the Decisive Role of the C₁₂-H Element in Photoisomerization and Rhodopsin Activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131, 17933–17942. 10.1021/ja907577p

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Lugtenburg J. DeGrip W. J. (2017). Coupled HOOP Signature Correlates with Quantum Yield of Isorhodopsin and Analog Pigments. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1858, 118–125. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.11.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  Bownds M. D. (1967). Site of Attachment of Retinal in Rhodopsin. Nature216, 1178–1181. 10.1038/2161178a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  Boyden E. S. Zhang F. Bamberg E. Nagel G. Deisseroth K. (2005). Millisecond-timescale, Genetically Targeted Optical Control of Neural Activity. Nat. Neurosci.8, 1263–1268. 10.1038/nn1525

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  Bratanov D. Balandin T. Round E. Shevchenko V. Gushchin I. Polovinkin V. et al (2015). An Approach to Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins. The Case of Bacteriorhodopsin. PLoS ONE10, e0128390. 10.1371/journal.pone.0128390

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  Bratanov D. Kovalev K. Machtens J.-P. Astashkin R. Chizhov I. Soloviov D. et al (2019). Unique Structure and Function of Viral Rhodopsins. Nat. Commun.10, 4939. 10.1038/s41467-019-12718-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  Braun R. D. Linsenmeier R. A. Goldstick T. K. (1995). Oxygen Consumption in the Inner and Outer Retina of the Cat. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.36, 542–554.

  • Google Scholar

• 97

  Bridges C. D. B. (1977). Method for Preparing Stable Digitonin Solutions for Visual Pigment Extraction. Vis. Res.17, 301–302. 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90095-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  Bridges C. D. B. (1972). “The Rhodopsin-Porphyropsin Visual System,” in Photochemistry of Vision. Editor DartnallH. J. A. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 417–480. 10.1007/978-3-642-65066-6_11

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  Brinkmann A. Sternberg U. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Fernández Fernández I. Lugtenburg J. Kentgens A. P. M. et al (2018). Insight into the Chromophore of Rhodopsin and its Meta-II Photointermediate by ¹⁹F Solid-State NMR and Chemical Shift Tensor Calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20, 30174–30188. 10.1039/c8cp05886e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  Brinks D. Adam Y. Kheifets S. Cohen A. E. (2016). Painting with Rainbows: Patterning Light in Space, Time, and Wavelength for Multiphoton Optogenetic Sensing and Control. Accounts Chem. Res.49, 2518–2526. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00415

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  Broecker J. Eger B. T. Ernst O. P. (2017). Crystallogenesis of Membrane Proteins Mediated by Polymer-Bounded Lipid Nanodiscs. Structure25, 384–392. 10.1016/j.str.2016.12.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  Broser M. (2022). Far-Red Absorbing Rhodopsins, Insights from Heterodimeric Rhodopsin-Cyclases. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 806922. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.806922

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  Broser M. Spreen A. Konold P. E. Peter E. Adam S. Borin V. et al (2020). NeoR, a Near-Infrared Absorbing Rhodopsin. Nat. Commun.11, 5682. 10.1038/s41467-020-19375-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  Brouillette C. G. Mcmichens R. B. Stern L. J. Khorana H. G. (1989). Structure and Thermal-Stability of Monomeric Bacteriorhodopsin in Mixed Phospholipid Detergent Micelles. Proteins-Structure Funct. Genet.5, 38–46. 10.1002/prot.340050106

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  Brown J. Behnam R. Coddington L. Tervo D. G. R. Martin K. Proskurin M. et al (2018). Expanding the Optogenetics Toolkit by Topological Inversion of Rhodopsins. Cell.175, 1131–1140. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  Brown L. S. Ernst O. P. (2017). Recent Advances in Biophysical Studies of Rhodopsins - Oligomerization, Folding, and Structure. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Proteins Proteomics1865, 1512–1521. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.08.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  Brown L. S. (2004). Fungal Rhodopsins and Opsin-Related Proteins: Eukaryotic Homologues of Bacteriorhodopsin with Unknown Functions. Photochem. Photobiological Sci.3, 555–565. 10.1039/b315527g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  Brown L. S. Ladizhansky V. (2015). Membrane Proteins in Their Native Habitat as Seen by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Protein Sci.24, 1333–1346. 10.1002/pro.2700

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  Brown L. S. (2022). Light-driven Proton Transfers and Proton Transport by Microbial Rhodopsins - A Biophysical Perspective. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes1864, 183867. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2022.183867

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  Brown L. S. Needleman R. Lanyi J. K. (1996). Interaction of Proton and Chloride Transfer Pathways in Recombinant Bacteriorhodopsin with Chloride Transport Activity: Implications for the Chloride Translocation Mechanism. Biochemistry35, 16048–16054. 10.1021/bi9622938

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  Bruun S. Stoeppler D. Keidel A. Kuhlmann U. Luck M. Diehl A. et al (2015). Light-dark Adaptation of Channelrhodopsin Involves Photoconversion between the All-Trans and 13-cis Retinal Isomers. Biochemistry54, 5389–5400. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00597

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  Buda F. Keijer T. Ganapathy S. De Grip W. J. (2017). A Quantum-Mechanical Study of the Binding Pocket of Proteorhodopsin: Absorption and Vibrational Spectra Modulated by Analogue Chromophores. Photochem. Photobiol.93, 1399–1406. 10.1111/php.12800

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  Buhrke D. Hildebrandt P. (2020). Probing Structure and Reaction Dynamics of Proteins Using Time-Resolved Resonance Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Rev.120, 3577–3630. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00429

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  Butt H.-J. (1990). Quantum Efficiency of Native and Mutant Bacteriorhodopsin Obtained from Blue Light Induced Relaxation Experiments. Eur. Biophys. J.19, 31–39. 10.1007/bf00223571

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  Caffrey M. (2003). Membrane Protein Crystallization. J. Struct. Biol.142, 108–132. 10.1016/s1047-8477(03)00043-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  Cai Y. Y. Liu Y. T. Culhane K. J. Devree B. T. Yang Y. Sunahara R. K. et al (2017). Purification of Family B G Protein-Coupled Receptors Using Nanodiscs: Application to Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor. PLoS ONE12, 0179568. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179568

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  Calligaro H. Dkhissi-Benyahya O. Panda S. (2022). Ocular and Extraocular Roles of Neuropsin in Vertebrates. Trends Neurosci.1776, 1–12. 10.1016/j.tins.2021.11.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  Cao P. X. Sun W. Kramp K. Zheng M. Salom D. Jastrzebska B. et al (2012). Light-sensitive Coupling of Rhodopsin and Melanopsin to G_i/o and G_q Signal Transduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J.26, 480–491. 10.1096/fj.11-197798

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  Cardin J. A. Carlén M. Meletis K. Knoblich U. Zhang F. Deisseroth K. et al (2010). Targeted Optogenetic Stimulation and Recording of Neurons In Vivo Using Cell-type-specific Expression of Channelrhodopsin-2. Nat. Protoc.5, 247–254. 10.1038/nprot.2009.228

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  Carpine R. Olivieri G. Hellingwerf K. J. Pollio A. Marzocchella A. (2020). Industrial Production of Poly-Beta-Hydroxybutyrate from CO2: Can Cyanobacteria Meet This Challenge?Processes8, 323–321323.

  • Google Scholar

• 121

  Carravetta M. Zhao X. Johannessen O. G. Lai W. C. Verhoeven M. A. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. et al (2004). Protein-induced Bonding Perturbation of the Rhodopsin Chromophore Detected by Double-Quantum Solid-State NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc.126, 3948–3953. 10.1021/ja039390q

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  Casey J. R. Ferrón S. Karl D. M. (2017). Light-Enhanced Microbial Organic Carbon Yield. Front. Microbiol.8, 2157. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02157

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  Cassim J. Y. (1992). Unique Biphasic Band Shape of the Visible Circular Dichroism of Bacteriorhodopsin in Purple Membrane. Excitons, Multiple Transitions or Protein Heterogeneity?Biophys. J.63, 1432–1442. 10.1016/s0006-3495(92)81701-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  Chabre M. Lemaire M. (2005). Monomeric G-Protein-Coupled Receptor as a Functional Unit. Biochemistry44, 9395–9403. 10.1021/bi050720o

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  Chan T. Lee M. Sakmar T. P. (1992). Introduction of Hydroxyl-Bearing Amino Acids Causes Bathochromic Spectral Shifts in Rhodopsin - Amino Acid Substitutions Responsible for Red-Green Color Pigment Spectral Tuning. J. Biol. Chem.267, 9478–9480. 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50115-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  Chang C.-F. Kuramochi H. Singh M. Abe-Yoshizumi R. Tsukuda T. Kandori H. et al (2022). A Unified View on Varied Ultrafast Dynamics of the Primary Process in Microbial Rhodopsins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202111930. 10.1002/anie.202111930

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  Chang C. F. Kuramochi H. Singh M. Abe-Yoshizumi R. Tsukuda T. Kandori H. et al (2019). Acid-base Equilibrium of the Chromophore Counterion Results in Distinct Photoisomerization Reactivity in the Primary Event of Proteorhodopsin. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.21, 25728–25734. 10.1039/c9cp04991f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  Charvolin D. Perez J.-B. Rouvière F. Giusti F. Bazzacco P. Abdine A. et al (2009). The Use of Amphipols as Universal Molecular Adapters to Immobilize Membrane Proteins onto Solid Supports. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106, 405–410. 10.1073/pnas.0807132106

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  Chawla U. Perera S. M. D. C. Fried S. D. E. Eitel A. R. Mertz B. Weerasinghe N. et al (2021). Activation of the G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Rhodopsin by Water. Angew. Chemie-International Ed.60, 2288–2295. 10.1002/anie.202003342

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  Chazan A. Rozenberg A. Mannen K. Nagata T. Tahan R. Yaish S. et al (2022). Diverse Heliorhodopsins Detected via Functional Metagenomics in Freshwater Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi and Archaea. Environ. Microbiol.2022, 15890. 10.1111/1462-2920.15890

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  Chen G.-Q. Gouaux J. E. (1996). Overexpression of Bacterio-Opsin in Escherichia coli as a Water-Soluble Fusion to Maltose Binding Protein: Efficient Regeneration of the Fusion Protein and Selective Cleavage with Trypsin. Protein Sci.5, 456–467. 10.1002/pro.5560050307

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  Chen M.-H. Kuemmel C. Birge R. R. Knox B. E. (2012). Rapid Release of Retinal from a Cone Visual Pigment Following Photoactivation. Biochemistry51, 4117–4125. 10.1021/bi201522h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  Chen Q. Arents J. C. Schuurmans J. M. Ganapathy S. De Grip W. J. Cheregi O. et al (2019b). Combining Retinal-Based and Chlorophyll-Based (Oxygenic) Photosynthesis: Proteorhodopsin Expression Increases Growth Rate and Fitness of a ΔPSI Strain of Synechocystis Sp. PCC6803. Metab. Eng.52, 68–76. 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.11.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  Chen Q. Arents J. Ganapathy S. DeGrip W. J. Hellingwerf K. J. (2017). Functional Expression of Gloeobacter Rhodopsin in Synechocystis Sp PCC6803. Photochem. Photobiol.93, 772–781. 10.1111/php.12745

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  Chen Q. Arents J. Schuurmans J. M. Ganapathy S. De Grip W. J. Cheregi O. et al (2019a). Functional Expression of Gloeobacter Rhodopsin in PSI-Less Synechocystis Sp. PCC6803. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.7, 67. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00067

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  Chen Q. Montesarchio D. Hellingwerf K. J. (2016a). “‘Direct Conversion’: Artificial Photosynthesis with Cyanobacteria,” in Artificial Photosynthesis. Editor BrunoR., 43–61. 10.1016/bs.abr.2016.03.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  Chen Q. Van Der Steen J. B. Arents J. C. Hartog A. F. Ganapathy S. De Grip W. J. et al (2018). Deletion of Sll1541 in Synechocystis Sp Strain PCC 6803 Allows Formation of a Far-Red-Shifted Holo-Proteorhodopsin In Vivo. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.84, e024351–0241714. 10.1128/AEM.02435-17

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  Chen Q. Van Der Steen J. B. Dekker H. L. Ganapathy S. De Grip W. J. Hellingwerf K. J. (2016b). Expression of Holo-Proteorhodopsin in Synechocystis Sp PCC 6803. Metab. Eng.35, 83–94. 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.02.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  Chen S. (2019). Optical Modulation Goes Deep in the Brain. Science365, 456–457. 10.1126/science.aay4350

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  Chien M.-P. Brinks D. Testa-Silva G. Tian H. Brooks F. P. I. Adam Y. et al (2021). Photoactivated Voltage Imaging in Tissue with an Archaerhodopsin-Derived Reporter. Sci. Adv.7, eabe3216. 10.1126/sciadv.abe3216

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  Chizhov I. Chernavskii D. S. Engelhard M. Mueller K.-H. Zubov B. V. Hess B. (1996). Spectrally Silent Transitions in the Bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle. Biophysical J.71, 2329–2345. 10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79475-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  Cho Y. K. Park D. Yang A. M. Chen F. Chuong A. S. Klapoetke N. C. et al (2019). Multidimensional Screening Yields Channelrhodopsin Variants Having Improved Photocurrent and Order-Of-Magnitude Reductions in Calcium and Proton Currents. J. Biol. Chem.294, 3806–3821. 10.1074/jbc.ra118.006996

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  Choe H.-W. Kim Y. J. Park J. H. Morizumi T. Pai E. F. Krauß N. et al (2011). Crystal Structure of Metarhodopsin II. Nature471, 651–655. 10.1038/nature09789

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  Choi A. R. Shi L. C. Brown L. S. Jung K.-H. (2014). Cyanobacterial Light-Driven Proton Pump, Gloeobacter Rhodopsin: Complementarity between Rhodopsin-Based Energy Production and Photosynthesis. PLoS ONE9, e110643. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110643

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  Choi E. H. Daruwalla A. Suh S. Leinonen H. Palczewski K. (2021). Retinoids in the Visual Cycle: Role of the Retinal G Protein-Coupled Receptor. J. Lipid Res.62, 1000–1040. 10.1194/jlr.tr120000850

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  Chow B. Y. Han X. Dobry A. S. Qian X. F. Chuong A. S. Li M. J. et al (2010). High-performance Genetically Targetable Optical Neural Silencing by Light-Driven Proton Pumps. Nature463, 98–102. 10.1038/nature08652

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  Chuon K. Kim S. Y. Meas S. Shim J.-G. Cho S.-G. Kang K.-W. et al (2021). Assembly of Natively Synthesized Dual Chromophores into Functional Actinorhodopsin. Front. Microbiol.12, 652328. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.652328

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  Church J. R. Amoyal G. S. Borin V. A. Adam S. Olsen J. M. H. Schapiro I. (2022). Deciphering the Spectral Tuning Mechanism in Proteorhodopsin: The Dominant Role of Electrostatics Instead of Chromophore Geometry. Chem. - A Eur. J.28, e202200139. 10.1002/chem.202200139

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  Church J. R. Haugaard Olsen J. M. Schapiro I. (2022b). The Impact of Retinal Configuration on the Protein-Chromophore Interactions in Bistable Jumping Spider Rhodopsin-1. Molecules27, 71. 10.3390/molecules27010071

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  Civjan N. R. Bayburt T. H. Schuler M. A. Sligar S. G. (2003). Direct Solubilization of Heterologously Expressed Membrane Proteins by Incorporation into Nanoscale Lipid Bilayers. BioTechniques35, 556–563. 10.2144/03353rr02

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  Cokic M. Bruegmann T. Sasse P. Malan D. (2021). Optogenetic Stimulation of G_i Signaling Enables Instantaneous Modulation of Cardiomyocyte Pacemaking. Front. physiology12, 768495. 10.3389/fphys.2021.768495

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  Collette F. Renger T. Müh F. Schmidt Am Busch M. (2018). Red/Green Color Tuning of Visual Rhodopsins: Electrostatic Theory Provides a Quantitative Explanation. J. Phys. Chem. B122, 4828–4837. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b02702

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  Concistrè M. Gansmüller A. Mclean N. Johannessen O. G. Marín-Montesinos I. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. et al (2008). Double-quantum ¹³C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Bathorhodopsin, the First Photointermediate in Mammalian Vision. J. Am. Chem. Soc.130, 10490–10491. 10.1021/ja803801u

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  Contreras E. Nobleman A. P. Robinson P. R. Schmidt T. M. (2021). Melanopsin Phototransduction: beyond Canonical Cascades. J. Exp. Biol.224, 224–221214. 10.1242/jeb.226522

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  Cooper A. (1979). Energetics of Rhodopsin and Isorhodopsin. FEBS Lett.100, 382–384. 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80375-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  Copits B. A. Gowrishankar R. O'neill P. R. Li J.-N. Girven K. S. Yoo J. J. et al (2021). A Photoswitchable GPCR-Based Opsin for Presynaptic Inhibition. Neuron109, 1791–1809. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.04.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  Córdova C. Lozano C. Rodríguez B. Marchant I. Zúñiga R. Ochova P. et al (2021). Optogenetic Control of Cancer Cell Survival in ChR2-Transfected HeLa Cells. Int. J. Exp. pathology102, 242. 10.1111/iep.12426

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  Creemers A. F. L. Kiihne S. R. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. DeGrip W. J. Lugtenburg J. De Groot H. J. M. (2002). ¹H and ¹³C MAS NMR Evidence for Pronounced Ligand-Protein Interactions Involving the Ionone Ring of the Retinylidene Chromophore in Rhodopsin. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.99, 9101–9106. 10.1073/pnas.112677599

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  Creemers A. F. L. Klaassen C. H. W. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Kelle R. Kragl U. Raap J. et al (1999). ¹⁵N Solid State NMR Evidence for a Compex Schiff Base Counterion in the Visual G Protein-Coupled Receptor Rhodopsin. Biochemistry-USA38, 7195–7199. 10.1021/bi9830157

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  Crescitelli F. (1991). The Natural History of Visual Pigments: 1990. Prog. Retin. Res.11, 1–32. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1958.tb39548.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  Crouch R. K. Kefalov V. J. Gärtner W. Cornwall M. C. (2002). Use of Retinal Analogues for the Study of Visual Pigment Function. Meth. Enzymol.343, 29–48. 10.1016/s0076-6879(02)43126-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  Crouch R. K. Nodes B. R. Perlman J. I. Pepperberg D. R. Akita H. Nakanishi K. (1984). Cycloheptatrienylidene Analog of 11-cis Retinal. Formation of Pigment in Photoreceptor Membranes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.25, 419–428.

  • Google Scholar

• 163

  Daemen F. J. M. (1973). Vertebrate Rod Outer Segment Membranes. Biochimica Biophysica Acta300, 255–288. 10.1016/0304-4157(73)90006-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  Dartnall H. J. A. (1962a). “The Chemical Structure and Photochemistry of the Visual Pigments,” in The Visual Process. Editor DavsonH.. 1 ed (New York, U.S.A.Academic Press), 427–471.

  • Google Scholar

• 165

  Dartnall H. J. A. (1962b). “The Identity and Distribution of Visual Pigments in the Animal Kingdom,” in The Visual Process. Editor DavsonH. (New York, U.S.A.Academic Press), 367–426.

  • Google Scholar

• 166

  Dartnall H. J. A. (1962c). “The Properties of Visual Pigments in Photoreceptors,” in The Visual Process. Editor DavsonH.. 1 ed (New York, U.S.A.Academic Press), 473–533.

  • Google Scholar

• 167

  Davidson F. F. Loewen P. C. Khorana H. G. (1994). Structure and Function in Rhodopsin: Replacement by Alanine of Cysteine Residues 110 and 187, Components of a Conserved Disulfide Bond in Rhodopsin, Affects the Light-Activated Metarhodopsin II State. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.91, 4029–4033. 10.1073/pnas.91.9.4029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  Davies A. Gowen B. E. Krebs A. M. Schertler G. F. X. Saibil H. R. (2001). Three-dimensional Structure of an Invertebrate Rhodopsin and Basis for Ordered Alignment in the Photoreceptor Membrane. J. Mol. Biol.314, 455–463. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5167

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  Davies A. Schertler G. F. X. Gowen B. E. Saibil H. R. (1996). Projection Structure of an Invertebrate Rhodopsin. J. Struct. Biol.117, 36–44. 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0067

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  Davies W. I. L. Collin S. P. Hunt D. M. (2012). Molecular Ecology and Adaptation of Visual Photopigments in Craniates. Mol. Ecol.21, 3121–3158. 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05617.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  Davies W. I. L. Hankins M. W. Foster R. G. (2010). Vertebrate Ancient Opsin and Melanopsin: Divergent Irradiance Detectors. Photochem. Photobiological Sci.9, 1444–1457. 10.1039/c0pp00203h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  Davies W. I. L. Sghari S. Upton B. A. Nord C. Hahn M. Ahlgren U. et al (2021). Distinct Opsin 3 (Opn3) Expression in the Developing Nervous System during Mammalian Embryogenesis. eNeuro8, 0141–0121. 10.1523/eneuro.0141-21.2021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  Davies W. I. L. Tamai T. K. Zheng L. Fu J. K. Rihel J. Foster R. G. et al (2015). An Extended Family of Novel Vertebrate Photopigments Is Widely Expressed and Displays a Diversity of Function. Genome Res.25, 1666–1679. 10.1101/gr.189886.115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  Dawadi P. B. S. Lugtenburg J. (2010). Synthesis and Use of Stable Isotope Enriched Retinals in the Field of Vitamin A. Molecules15, 1825–1872. 10.3390/molecules15031825

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  De Silva S. R. Barnard A. R. Hughes S. Tam S. K. E. Martin C. Singh M. S. et al (2017). Long-term Restoration of Visual Function in End-Stage Retinal Degeneration Using Subretinal Human Melanopsin Gene Therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.114, 11211–11216. 10.1073/pnas.1701589114

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  DeGrip W. J. Bonting S. L. Daemen F. J. M. (1973). The Binding Site of Retinaldehyde in Cattle Rhodopsin. Biochimica Biophysica Acta303, 189–193. 10.1016/0005-2795(73)90162-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  DeGrip W. J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. (1979). Synthesis and Properties of Alkylglucosides with Mild Detergent Action: Improved Synthesis and Purification of β-1-octyl, -nonyl- and -Decyl-Glucose. Synthesis of β-1-undecylglucose and β-1-dodecylmaltose. Chem. Phys. Lipids23, 321–335. 10.1016/0009-3084(79)90010-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  DeGrip W. J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Van Der Hoef I. Lugtenburg J. (2007). 7, 8-Dihydro-Retinals Outperform the Native Retinals in Conferring Photosensitivity to Visual Opsin. jacs129, 13265–13269. 10.1021/ja074937c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  DeGrip W. J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Wang Y.-J. Verhoeven M. A. Lugtenburg J. (2011). Cyclopropyl and Isopropyl Derivatives of 11-cis and 9-cis Retinals at C-9 and C-13: Subtle Steric Differences with Major Effects on Ligand Efficacy in Rhodopsin. J. Nat. Prod.74, 383–390. 10.1021/np100744v

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  DeGrip W. J. Daemen F. J. M. Bonting S. L. (1980). Isolation and Purification of Bovine Rhodopsin. Meth. Enzymol.67, 301–320. 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)67038-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  DeGrip W. J. DeLange F. Klaassen C. H. W. Verdegem P. J. E. Wallace-Williams S. E. Creemers A. F. L. et al (1999). “Photoactivation of Rhodopsin: Interplay between Protein and Chromophore,” in Rhodopsins and Phototransduction. Editor GoodeJ. A. (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons), 102–118.

  • Google Scholar

• 182

  DeGrip W. J. Gillespie J. Rothschild K. J. (1985). Carboxyl Group Involvement in the Meta I and Meta II Stages in Rhodopsin Bleaching. A Fourier Transform Infra-red Spectroscopic Study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta809, 97–106. 10.1016/0005-2728(85)90172-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  DeGrip W. J. Gray D. Gillespie J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Vandenberg E. M. M. Lugtenburg J. et al (1988). Photoexcitation of Rhodopsin: Conformation Changes in the Chromophore, Protein and Associated Lipid, as Determined by FTIR Difference Spectroscopy. Photochem. Photobiol.48, 497–504. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1988.tb02852.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  DeGrip W. J. Liu R. S. H. Ramamurthy V. Asato A. E. (1976). Rhodopsin Analogues from Highly Hindered 7-cis Isomers of Retinal. Nature262, 416–418. 10.1038/262416a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  DeGrip W. J. Rothschild K. J. (2000). “Structure and Mechanism of Vertebrate Visual Pigments,” in Molecular Mechanisms in Visual Transduction. Editors StavengaD. G.DeGripW. J.PughJr.E. N. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Pub.), 1–54. 10.1016/s1383-8121(00)80004-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  DeGrip W. J. (1982). Thermal Stability of Rhodopsin and Opsin in Some Novel Detergents. Meth. Enzymol.81, 256–265. 10.1016/s0076-6879(82)81040-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  DeGrip W. J. VanOostrum J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. (1998). Selective Detergent-Extraction from Mixed Detergent/lipid/protein Micelles, Using Cyclodextrin Inclusion Compounds: A Novel Generic Approach for the Preparation of Proteoliposomes. Biochem. J.330, 667–674. 10.1042/bj3300667

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  DeGrip W. J. VanOostrum J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Van Der Steen R. Van Amsterdam L. J. P. Groesbeek M. et al (1990). 10, 20-Methanorhodopsins: (7E, 9E, 13E)-10, 20-methanorhodopsin and (7E, 9Z, 13Z)-10, 20-methanorhodopsin - 11-Cis-Locked Rhodopsin Analog Pigments with Unusual Thermal and Photo-Stability. Eur. J. Biochem.191, 211–220. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19112.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  Deininger W. Kröger P. Hegemann U. Lottspeich F. Hegemann P. (1995). Chlamyrhodopsin Represents a New Type of Sensory Photoreceptor. EMBO J.14, 5849–5858. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00273.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  Deisseroth K. (2010). Controlling the Brain with Light. Sci. Am.303, 48–55. 10.1038/scientificamerican1110-48

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  Deisseroth K. Hegemann P. (2017). The Form and Function of Channelrhodopsin. Science357, eaan5544. 10.1126/science.aan5544

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  Deisseroth K. (2015). Optogenetics: 10 Years of Microbial Opsins in Neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci.18, 1213–1225. 10.1038/nn.4091

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  Del Carmen Marín M. Agathangelou D. Orozco-Gonzalez Y. Valentini A. Kato Y. Abe-Yoshizumi R. et al (2019a). Fluorescence Enhancement of a Microbial Rhodopsin via Electronic Reprogramming. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 262–271. 10.1021/jacs.8b09311

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  Del Carmen Marín M. De Vico L. Dong S. J. S. Gagliardi L. Truhlar D. G. Olivucci M. (2019b). Assessment of MC-PDFT Excitation Energies for a Set of QM/MM Models of Rhodopsins. J. Chem. Theory Comput.15, 1915–1923. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01069

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  DeLange F. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Pistorius A. M. A. Rothschild K. J. DeGrip W. J. (1999). Probing Intramolecular Orientations in Rhodopsin and Metarhodopsin II by Polarized Infrared Difference Spectroscopy. Biochemistry-USA38, 13200–13209. 10.1021/bi9909501

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  DeLange F. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Vanoostrum J. Portier M. D. Verdegem P. J. E. Lugtenburg J. et al (1998a). An Additional Methyl Group at the 10-position of Retinal Dramatically Slows Down the Kinetics of the Rhodopsin Photocascade. Biochemistry-USA37, 1411–1420. 10.1021/bi972397y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  DeLange F. Klaassen C. H. W. Wallace-Williams S. E. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Liu X.-M. DeGrip W. J. et al (1998b). Tyrosine Structural Changes Detected during the Photoactivation of Rhodopsin. J. Biol. Chem.273, 23735–23739. 10.1074/jbc.273.37.23735

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  DeLange F. Merkx M. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Pistorius A. M. A. DeGrip W. J. (1997). Modulation of the Metarhodopsin I/metarhodopsin II Equilibrium of Bovine Rhodopsin by Ionic Strength - Evidence for a Surface Charge Effect. Eur. J. Biochem.243, 174–180. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.0174a.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  Demoulin B. Maiuri M. Berbasova T. Geiger J. H. Borhan B. Garavelli M. et al (2021). Control of Protonated Schiff Base Excited State Decay within Visual Protein Mimics: A Unified Model for Retinal Chromophores. Chemistry-A Eur. J.27, 16389. 10.1002/chem.202102383

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  Dencher N. A. Heyn M. P. (1978). Formation and Properties of Bacteriorhodopsin Monomers in the Nonionic Detergents Octyl-β-D-Glucoside and Triton X-100. FEBS Lett.96, 322–326. 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80427-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  Derguini F. Caldwell C. G. Motto M. G. Balogh-Nair V. Nakanishi K. (1983). Bacteriorhodopsins Containing Cyanine Dye Chromophores - Support for the External Point-Charge Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc.105, 646–648. 10.1021/ja00341a068

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  Derguini F. Nakanishi K. (1986). Synthetic Rhodopsin Analogs. Photobiochem. Photobiophys.13, 259–283.

  • Google Scholar

• 203

  Deubner J. Coulon P. Diester I. (2019). Optogenetic Approaches to Study the Mammalian Brain. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.57, 157–163. 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.04.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  Devine E. L. Oprian D. D. Theobald D. L. (2013). Relocating the Active-Site Lysine in Rhodopsin and Implications for Evolution of Retinylidene Proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110, 13351–13355. 10.1073/pnas.1306826110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205

  Ding X. Y. Sun C. Cui H. L. Chen S. J. Gao Y. J. Yang Y. A. et al (2018). Functional Roles of Tyrosine 185 during the Bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle as Revealed by In Situ Spectroscopic Studies. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1859, 1006–1014. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2018.05.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  Dokukina I. Nenov A. Garavelli M. Marian C. M. Weingart O. (2019). QM/MM Photodynamics of Retinal in the Channelrhodopsin Chimera C1C2 with OM3/MRCI. ChemPhotoChem3, 107–116. 10.1002/cptc.201800185

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207

  Döring C. C. Kumar S. Tumu S. C. Kourtesis I. Hausen H. (2020). The Visual Pigment Xenopsin Is Widespread in Protostome Eyes and Impacts the View on Eye Evolution. Elife9, e55193. 10.7554/eLife.55193

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  Dörr J. M. Scheidelaar S. Koorengevel M. C. Dominguez J. J. Schäfer M. Van Walree C. A. et al (2016). The Styrene-Maleic Acid Copolymer: A Versatile Tool in Membrane Research. Eur. Biophysics J. Biophysics Lett.45, 3–21. 10.1007/s00249-015-1093-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 209

  Dowling J. E. (2020). Vitamin A: its Many Roles - from Vision and Synaptic Plasticity to Infant Mortality. J. Comp. Physiology a-Neuroethology Sens. Neural Behav. Physiology206, 389–399. 10.1007/s00359-020-01403-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210

  Du W. Caicedo Burbano P. Hellingwerf K. J. Branco Dos Santos F. (2018). “Challenges in the Application of Synthetic Biology towards Synthesis of Commodity Products by Cyanobacteria via “Direct Conversion”,” in Synthetic Biology of Cyanobacteria. Editors ZhangW.SongX. (Gateway East, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.), 3–26. 10.1007/978-981-13-0854-3_1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 211

  Duda M. Domagalik A. Orlowska-Feuer P. Krzysztynska-Kuleta O. Beldzik E. Smyk M. K. et al (2020). Melanopsin: From a Small Molecule to Brain Functions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.113, 190–203. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 212

  Dunham T. D. Farrens D. L. (1999). Conformational Changes in Rhodopsin - Movement of Helix F Detected by Site-specific Chemical Labeling and Fluorescence Spectroscopy. J. Biol. Chem.274, 1683–1690. 10.1074/jbc.274.3.1683

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  Ebrey T. G. Koutalos Y. (2001). Vertebrate Photoreceptors. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.20, 49–94. 10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00014-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 214

  Ehsan M. Katsube S. Cecchetti C. Du Y. Mortensen J. S. Wang H. Q. et al (2020). New Malonate-Derived Tetraglucoside Detergents for Membrane Protein Stability. ACS Chem. Biol.15, 1697–1707. 10.1021/acschembio.0c00316

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 215

  Eickelbeck D. Rudack T. Tennigkeit S. A. Surdin T. Karapinar R. Schwitalla J. C. et al (2020). Lamprey Parapinopsin ("UVLamP"): a Bistable UV-Sensitive Optogenetic Switch for Ultrafast Control of GPCR Pathways. ChemBioChem21, 612–617. 10.1002/cbic.201900485

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  Eilers M. Goncalves J. A. Ahuja S. Kirkup C. Hirshfeld A. Simmerling C. et al (2012). Structural Transitions of Transmembrane Helix 6 in the Formation of Metarhodopsin I. J. Phys. Chem. B116, 10477–10489. 10.1021/jp3019183

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  Eilers M. Ying W. W. Reeves P. J. Khorana H. G. Smith S. O. (2002). Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Isotopically Labeled Rhodopsin. Meth. Enzymol.343, 212–222. 10.1016/s0076-6879(02)43137-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 218

  El Khatib S. Atamian A. (2019). Evolution of Color Vision in Vertebrates. Delhi, India: Akinik Publications, 19–42.

  • Google Scholar

• 219

  El-Tahawy M. M. T. Conti I. Bonfanti M. Nenov A. Garavelli M. (2020). Tailoring Spectral and Photochemical Properties of Bioinspired Retinal Mimics by In Silico Engineering. Angew. Chemie-International Ed.59, 20619–20627. 10.1002/anie.202008644

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 220

  Engel A. Gaub H. E. (2008). Structure and Mechanics of Membrane Proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem.77, 127–148. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.154450

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 221

  Engelhard C. Chizhov I. Sieber F. Engelhard M. (2018). Microbial Halorhodopsins: Light-Driven Chloride Pumps. Chem. Rev.118, 10629–10645. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00715

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 222

  Engqvist M. K. M. Mcisaac R. S. Dollinger P. Flytzanis N. C. Abrams M. Schor S. et al (2015). Directed Evolution of Gloeobacter Violaceus Rhodopsin Spectral Properties. J. Mol. Biol.427, 205–220. 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.06.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223

  Erbguth K. Prigge M. Schneider F. Hegemann P. Gottschalk A. (2012). Bimodal Activation of Different Neuron Classes with the Spectrally Red-Shifted Channelrhodopsin Chimera C1V1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE7, e46827. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046827

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 224

  Ernst O. P. Lodowski D. T. Elstner M. Hegemann P. Brown L. S. Kandori H. (2014). Microbial and Animal Rhodopsins: Structures, Functions, and Molecular Mechanisms. Chem. Rev.114, 126–163. 10.1021/cr4003769

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225

  Ewald A. Kühne W. (1878). “Untersuchungen über den Sehpurpur,” in Untersuchungen aus dem Physiologischen Institute der Universität Heidelberg. Editor KühneW., 248–290.

  • Google Scholar

• 226

  Farrens D. L. (2010). What Site-Directed Labeling Studies Tell Us about the Mechanism of Rhodopsin Activation and G-Protein Binding. Photochem. Photobiological Sci.9, 1466–1474. 10.1039/c0pp00283f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 227

  Feldman T. B. Ivankov O. I. Kuklin A. I. Murugova T. N. Yakovleva M. A. Smitienko O. A. et al (2019). Small-angle Neutron and X-Ray Scattering Analysis of the Supramolecular Organization of Rhodopsin in Photoreceptor Membrane. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes1861, 183000. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.05.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 228

  Feng J. Brown M. F. Mertz B. (2015). Retinal Flip in Rhodopsin Activation?Biophysical J.108, 2767–2770. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.04.040

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 229

  Feng J. Mertz B. (2015). Proteorhodopsin Activation Is Modulated by Dynamic Changes in Internal Hydration. Biochemistry54, 7132–7141. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00932

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 230

  Feng S. Powell S. M. Wilson R. Bowman J. P. (2013). Light-stimulated Growth of Proteorhodopsin-Bearing Sea-Ice Psychrophile Psychroflexus Torquis Is Salinity Dependent. ISME J.7, 2206–2213. 10.1038/ismej.2013.97

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 231

  Feng X. Verdegem P. J. E. Lee Y. K. Sandström D. Edén M. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. et al (1997). Direct Determination of a Molecular Torsional Angle in the Membrane Protein Rhodopsin by Solid-State NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc.119, 6853–6857. 10.1021/ja970710d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232

  Feuda R. Menon A. K. Göpfert M. C. (2022). Rethinking Opsins. Mol. Biol. Evol.39, msac033. 10.1093/molbev/msac033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 233

  Feuda R. Rota-Stabelli O. Oakley T. H. Pisani D. (2014). The Comb Jelly Opsins and the Origins of Animal Phototransduction. Genome Biol. Evol.6, 1964–1971. 10.1093/gbe/evu154

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234

  Fischer P. Mukherjee S. Peter E. Broser M. Bartl F. Hegemann P. (2021). The Inner Mechanics of Rhodopsin Guanylyl Cyclase during cGMP-Formation Revealed by Real-Time FTIR Spectroscopy. eLife10, e71384. 10.7554/eLife.71384

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 235

  Fleming J. F. Feuda R. Roberts N. W. Pisani D. (2020). A Novel Approach to Investigate the Effect of Tree Reconstruction Artifacts in Single-Gene Analysis Clarifies Opsin Evolution in Nonbilaterian Metazoans. Genome Biol. Evol.12, 3906–3916. 10.1093/gbe/evaa015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 236

  Flytzanis N. C. Bedbrook C. N. Chiu H. Engqvist M. K. M. Xiao C. Chan K. Y. et al (2014). Archaerhodopsin Variants with Enhanced Voltage-Sensitive Fluorescence in Mammalian and Caenorhabditis elegans Neurons. Nat. Commun.5, 4894. 10.1038/ncomms5894

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 237

  Foster R. G. Hankins M. W. (2002). Non-rod, Non-cone Photoreception in the Vertebrates. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.21, 507–527. 10.1016/s1350-9462(02)00036-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238

  Fotiadis D. Jastrzebska B. Philippsen A. Müller D. J. Palczewski K. Engel A. (2006). Structure of the Rhodopsin Dimer: A Working Model for G-Protein-Coupled Receptors. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.16, 252–259. 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.03.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 239

  Fotiadis D. Liang Y. Filipek S. Saperstein D. A. Engel A. Palczewski K. (2004). The G Protein-Coupled Receptor Rhodopsin in the Native Membrane. FEBS Lett.564, 281–288. 10.1016/s0014-5793(04)00194-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 240

  Fougère M. Van Der Zouwen C. I. Boutin J. A. Neszvecsko K. Sarret P. Ryczko D. (2021). Optogenetic Stimulation of Glutamatergic Neurons in the Cuneiform Nucleus Controls Locomotion in a Mouse Model of Parkinson's Disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118, e2110934118. 10.1073/pnas.2110934118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 241

  Frank M. Carlson D. B. Hunter M. S. Williams G. J. Messerschmidt M. Zatsepin N. A. et al (2014). Femtosecond X-Ray Diffraction from Two-Dimensional Protein Crystals. IUCrJ1, 95–100. 10.1107/s2052252514001444

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 242

  Frauenfeld J. Löving R. Armache J.-P. Sonnen A. F.-P. Guettou F. Moberg P. et al (2016). A Saposin-Lipoprotein Nanoparticle System for Membrane Proteins. Nat. Methods13, 345–351. 10.1038/nmeth.3801

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 243

  Friedman J. M. (2021). How the Discovery of Microbial Opsins Led to the Development of Optogenetics. Cell.184, 5266–5270. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 244

  Friedman N. Sheves M. Ottolenghi M. (1989). Model Systems for Rhodopsins: The Photolysis of Protonated Retinal Schiff-Bases, Cyanine Dye, and Artificial Cyanine-Bacteriorhodopsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc.111, 3203–3211. 10.1021/ja00191a015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 245

  Friedrich D. Perodeau J. Nieuwkoop A. J. Oschkinat H. (2020). MAS NMR Detection of Hydrogen Bonds for Protein Secondary Structure Characterization. J. Biomol. NMR74, 247–256. 10.1007/s10858-020-00307-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 246

  Fudim R. Szczepek M. Vierock J. Vogt A. Schmidt A. Kleinau G. et al (2019). Design of a Light-Gated Proton Channel Based on the Crystal Structure of Coccomyxa Rhodopsin. Sci. Signal.12, eaav4203. 10.1126/scisignal.aav4203

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 247

  Fujimoto K. J. (2021). Electronic Couplings and Electrostatic Interactions behind the Light Absorption of Retinal Proteins. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 752700. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.752700

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 248

  Fujimoto K. J. Hayashi S. Hasegawa J. Nakatsuji H. (2007). Theoretical Studies on the Color-Tuning Mechanism in Retinal Proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput.3, 605–618. 10.1021/ct6002687

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 249

  Fujimoto K. J. Inoue K. (2020). Excitonic Coupling Effect on the Circular Dichroism Spectrum of Sodium-Pumping Rhodopsin KR2. J. Chem. Phys.153, 04510. 10.1063/5.0013642

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 250

  Fujita S. Endo T. Ju J.-M. Kean E. L. Kobata A. (1994). Structural Studies of the N-Linked Sugar Chains of Human Rhodopsin. Glycobiology4, 633–640. 10.1093/glycob/4.5.633

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 251

  Fujiyabu C. Sato K. Nishio Y. Imamoto Y. Ohuchi H. Shichida Y., T. (2022). Amino Acid Residue at Position 188 Determines the UV-Sensitive Bistable Property of Vertebrate Non-visual Opsin Opn5. Commun. Biol.5, 63. 10.1038/s42003-022-03010-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 252

  Fukada Y. Shichida Y. Yoshizawa T. Ito M. Kodama A. Tsukida K. (1984). Studies on Structure and Function of Rhodopsin by Use of Cyclopentatrienylidene 11-Cis-Locked-Rhodopsin. Biochemistry23, 5826–5832. 10.1021/bi00319a023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 253

  Furuse M. Tamogami J. Hosaka T. Kikukawa T. Shinya N. Hato M. et al (2015). Structural Basis for the Slow Photocycle and Late Proton Release in Acetabularia Rhodopsin I from the Marine Plant Acetabularia Acetabulum. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F-Structural Biol.D71, 2203–2216. 10.1107/s1399004715015722

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 254

  Furutani Y. Kandori H. Shichida Y. (2003). Structural Changes in Lumirhodopsin and Metarhodopsin I Studied by Their Photoreactions at 77 K. Biochemistry42, 8494–8500. 10.1021/bi034438y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 255

  Furutani Y. Terakita A. Shichida Y. Kandori H. (2005). FTIR Studies of the Photoactivation Processes in Squid Retinochrome. Biochemistry44, 7988–7997. 10.1021/bi050219w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 256

  Ganapathy S. Bécheau O. Venselaar H. Frölich S. Van Der Steen J. B. Chen Q. et al (2015). Modulation of Spectral Properties and Pump Activity of Proteorhodopsins by Retinal Analogues. Biochem. J.467, 333–343. 10.1042/bj20141210

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 257

  Ganapathy S. Kratz S. Chen Q. Hellingwerf K. J. De Groot H. J. M. Rothschild K. J. et al (2019). Redshifted and Near-Infrared Active Analog Pigments Based upon Archaerhodopsin-3. Photochem. Photobiol.95, 959–968. 10.1111/php.13093

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 258

  Ganapathy S. Liu R. S. H. (1992). Photoisomerization of Sixteen Isomers of Retinal. Initial Product Distribution in Direct and Sensitized Irradiation. Photochem. Photobiol.56, 959–964. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb09718.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 259

  Ganapathy S. Opdam L. Hontani Y. Frehan S. Chen Q. Hellingwerf K. J. et al (2020). Membrane Matters: The Impact of a Nanodisc-Bilayer or a Detergent Microenvironment on the Properties of Two Eubacterial Rhodopsins. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes1862, 183113. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 260

  Ganapathy S. Venselaar H. Chen Q. De Groot H. J. M. Hellingwerf K. J. De Grip W. J. (2017). Retinal-based Proton Pumping in the Near Infrared. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 2338–2344. 10.1021/jacs.6b11366

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 261

  García-Nafría J. Tate C. G. (2020). Cryo-Electron Microscopy: Moving beyond X-Ray Crystal Structures for Drug Receptors and Drug Development. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.60, 51–71.

  • Google Scholar

• 262

  Garczarek F. Gerwert K. (2006). Functional Waters in Intraprotein Proton Transfer Monitored by FTIR Difference Spectroscopy. Nature439, 109–112. 10.1038/nature04231

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 263

  Gärtner W. (2000). “Invertebrate Visual Pigments,” in Molecular Mechanisms in Visual Transduction. Editors StavengaD. G.DeGripW. J.PughJr.E. N. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Pub.), 298–388.

  • Google Scholar

• 264

  Gärtner W. Ullrich D. Vogt K. (1991). Quantum Yield of CHAPSO-Solubilized Rhodopsin and 3-Hydroxy-Retinal Containing Bovine Opsin. Photochem. Photobiol.54, 1047–1055.

  • Google Scholar

• 265

  Gascón J. A. Sproviero E. M. Batista V. S. (2005). QM/MM Study of the NMR Spectroscopy of the Retinyl Chromophore in Visual Rhodopsin. J. Chem. Theory Comput.1, 674–685. 10.1021/ct0500850

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 266

  Geiser A. H. Sievert M. K. Guo L. W. Grant J. E. Krebs M. P. Fotiadis D. et al (2006). Bacteriorhodopsin Chimeras Containing the Third Cytoplasmic Loop of Bovine Rhodopsin Activate Transducin for GTP/GDP Exchange. Protein Sci.15, 1679–1690. 10.1110/ps.062192306

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 267

  Gerrard E. Mutt E. Nagata T. Koyanagi M. Flock T. Lesca E. et al (2018). Convergent Evolution of Tertiary Structure in Rhodopsin Visual Proteins from Vertebrates and Box Jellyfish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.115, 6201–6206. 10.1073/pnas.1721333115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 268

  Gerwert K. Freier E. Wolf S. (2014). The Role of Protein-Bound Water Molecules in Microbial Rhodopsins. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 606–613. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.09.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 269

  Ghanbarpour A. Nairat M. Nosrati M. Santos E. M. Vasileiou C. Dantus M. et al (2019). Mimicking Microbial Rhodopsin Isomerization in a Single Crystal. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 1735–1741. 10.1021/jacs.8b12493

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 270

  Gibson S. K. Parkes J. H. Liebman P. A. (1999). Phosphorylation Alters the pH-dependent Active State Equilibrium of Rhodopsin by Modulating the Membrane Surface Potential. Biochemistry-USA38, 11103–11114. 10.1021/bi990411w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 271

  Giesbers M. E. Bosman G. J. C. G. M. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. DeGrip W. J. (2007). Introduction of a Rod Aromatic Cluster Does Not Improve the Structural Stability of the Human Green Cone Pigment. J. Struct. Biol.159, 222–227. 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.01.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 272

  Giesbers M. E. Shirzad-Wasei N. Bosman G. J. C. G. M. DeGrip W. J. (2008). Functional Expression, Targeting and Ca²⁺ Signaling of a Mouse Melanopsin-eYFP Fusion Protein in a Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cell Line. Photochem. Photobiol.84, 990–995. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00347.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 273

  Gilhooley M. J. Lindner M. Palumaa T. Hughes S. Peirson S. N. Hankins M. W. (2022). A Systematic Comparison of Optogenetic Approaches to Visual Restoration. Mol. Ther. Methods & Clin. Dev.25, 111. 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.03.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 274

  Gómez-Consarnau L. Raven J. A. Levine N. M. Cutter L. S. Wang D. L. Seegers B. et al (2019). Microbial Rhodopsins Are Major Contributors to the Solar Energy Captured in the Sea. Sci. Adv.5, eaaw8855. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw8855

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 275

  Gong X. Mendoza-Halliday D. Ting J. T. Kaiser T. Sun X. Y. Bastos A. M. et al (2020). An Ultra-sensitive Step-Function Opsin for Minimally Invasive Optogenetic Stimulation in Mice and Macaques. Neuron107, 38–51. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.03.032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 276

  Govorunova E. G. Gou Y. Y. Sineshchekov O. A. Li H. Wang Y. M. Brown L. S. et al (2022a). Kalium Rhodopsins: Natural Light-Gated Potassium Channels. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2021.09.17.460684

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 277

  Govorunova E. G. Sineshchekov O. A. Li H. Spudich J. L. (2017). Microbial Rhodopsins: Diversity, Mechanisms, and Optogenetic Applications. Annu. Rev. Biochem.86, 845–872. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-101910-144233

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 278

  Govorunova E. G. Sineshchekov O. A. Li H. Wang Y. Brown L. S. Palmateer A. et al (2021). Cation and Anion Channelrhodopsins: Sequence Motifs and Taxonomic Distribution. mBio12, e0165621. 10.1128/mbio.01656-21

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 279

  Govorunova E. G. Sineshchekov O. A. Li H. Wang Y. M. Brown L. S. Spudich J. L. (2020). RubyACRs, Nonalgal Anion Channelrhodopsins with Highly Red-Shifted Absorption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.117, 22833–22840. 10.1073/pnas.2005981117

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 280

  Govorunova E. G. Sineshchekov O. A. Spudich J. L. (2022b). Emerging Diversity of Channelrhodopsins and Their Structure-Function Relationships. Front. Cell. Neurosci.15, 800313. 10.3389/fncel.2021.800313

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 281

  Govorunova E. G. Sineshchekov O. A. Spudich J. L. (2016). Structurally Distinct Cation Channelrhodopsins from Cryptophyte Algae. Biophysical J.110, 2302–2304. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 282

  Gozem S. Luk H. L. Schapiro I. Olivucci M. (2017). Theory and Simulation of the Ultrafast Double-Bond Lsomerization of Biological Chromophores. Chem. Rev.117, 13502–13565. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00177

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 283

  Griffiths J. M. Bennett A. E. Engelhard M. Siebert F. Raap J. Lugtenburg J. et al (2000). Structural Investigation of the Active Site in Bacteriorhodopsin: Geometric Constraints on the Roles of Asp-85 and Asp-212 in the Proton-Pumping Mechanism from Solid-State NMR. Biochemistry39, 362–371. 10.1021/bi991106d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 284

  Grigorieff N. Ceska T. A. Downing K. H. Baldwin J. M. Henderson R. A. (1996). Electron-crystallographic Refinement of the Structure of Bacteriorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol.259, 393–421. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0328

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 285

  Grime R. L. Logan R. T. Nestorow S. A. Sridhar P. Edwards P. C. Tate C. G. et al (2021). Differences in SMA-like Polymer Architecture Dictate the Conformational Changes Exhibited by the Membrane Protein Rhodopsin Encapsulated in Lipid Nano-Particles. Nanoscale13, 13519–13528. 10.1039/d1nr02419a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 286

  Groenendijk G. W. T. DeGrip W. J. Daemen F. J. M. (1980). Quantitative Determination of Retinals with Complete Retention of Their Geometric Configuration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta617, 430–438. 10.1016/0005-2760(80)90009-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 287

  Grote M. Engelhard M. Hegemann P. (2014). Of Ion Pumps, Sensors and Channels - Perspectives on Microbial Rhodopsins between Science and History. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 533–545. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.08.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 288

  Gruber E. Kabylda A. M. Brøndsted Nielsen M. Rasmussen A. P. Teiwes R. Kusochek P. A. et al (2022). Light Driven Ultrafast Bioinspired Molecular Motors: Steering and Accelerating Photoisomerization Dynamics of Retinal. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 69–73. 10.1021/jacs.1c10752

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 289

  Guimarães Backhaus R. Fu T. Backhaus H. Stroh A. (2021). Pipeline for 2-photon All-Optical Physiology in Mouse: From Viral Titration and Optical Window Implantation to Binarization of Calcium Transients. Star. Protoc.2, 101010. 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.101010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 290

  Gulati S. Jastrzebska B. Banerjee S. Placeres A. L. Miszta P. Gao S. Q. et al (2017). Photocyclic Behavior of Rhodopsin Induced by an Atypical Isomerization Mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.114, E2608–E2615. 10.1073/pnas.1617446114

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 291

  Guo J. Wu Y. Gong Z. Chen X. Cao F. Kala S. et al (2022). Photonic Nanojet-Mediated Optogenetics. Adv. Sci.9, e2104140. 10.1002/advs.202104140

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 292

  Guo Y. (2020). Be Cautious with Crystal Structures of Membrane Proteins or Complexes Prepared in Detergents. Crystals10, 86. 10.3390/cryst10020086

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 293

  Halford S. Freedman M. S. Bellingham J. Inglis S. L. Poopalasundaram S. Soni B. G. et al (2001). Characterization of a Novel Human Opsin Gene with Wide Tissue Expression and Identification of Embedded and Flanking Genes on Chromosome 1q43. Genomics72, 203–208. 10.1006/geno.2001.6469

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 294

  Hallett F. R. Watton J. Krygsman P. (1991). Vesicle Sizing. Number Distributions by Dynamic Light Scattering. Biophys. J.59, 357–362. 10.1016/s0006-3495(91)82229-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 295

  Han S. Kim S.-H. Cho J. C. Song J. Bleckner G. Jung K.-H. (2020). Photochemical Characterization of Flavobacterial Rhodopsin: The Importance of the Helix E Region for Heat Stability. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1861, 148092. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2019.148092

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 296

  Hanai S. Katayama K. Imai H. Kandori H. (2021). Light-induced Difference FTIR Spectroscopy of Primate Blue-Sensitive Visual Pigment at 163 K. Biophysics Physicobiology18, 40–49. 10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 297

  Hara K. Y. Wada T. Kino K. Asahi T. Sawamura N. (2013). Construction of Photoenergetic Mitochondria in Cultured Mammalian Cells. Sci. Rep.3, 1635. 10.1038/srep01635

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 298

  Hara T. Hara R. Takeuchi J. (1967). Vision in Octopus and Squid. Nature214, 572–575. 10.1038/214572a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 299

  Harada Y. Senda T. Sakamoto T. Takamoto K. Ishibashi T. (1994). Expression of octopus Rhodopsin in Escherichia coli. J. Biochem. Tokyo115, 66–75. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124307

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 300

  Harbison G. S. Smith S. O. Pardoen J. A. Courtin J. M. L. Lugtenburg J. Herzfeld J. et al (1985). Solid-state 13C NMR Detection of a Perturbed 6-S-Trans Chromophore in Bacteriorhodopsin. Biochemistry24, 6955–6962. 10.1021/bi00345a031

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 301

  Hargrave P. A. Mcdowell J. H. Curtis D. R. Wang J. K. Juszcak E. Fong S.-L. et al (1983). The Structure of Bovine Rhodopsin. Biophys. Struct. Mech.9, 235–244. 10.1007/bf00535659

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 302

  Hargrave P. A. Mcdowell J. H. (1992). Rhodopsin and Phototransduction - A Model System for G-Protein-Linked Receptors. FASEB J.6, 2323–2331. 10.1096/fasebj.6.6.1544542

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 303

  Hargrave P. A. (1982). Rhodopsin Chemistry, Structure and Topography. Prog. Retin. Res.1, 2–51. 10.1016/0278-4327(82)90003-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 304

  Hargrave P. A. (1977). The Amino-Terminal Tryptic Peptide of Bovine Rhodopsin. A Glycopeptide Containing Two Sites of Oligosaccharide Attachment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta492, 83–94. 10.1016/0005-2795(77)90216-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 305

  Haris P. I. Robillard G. T. Vandijk A. A. Chapman D. (1992). Potential of ¹³C and ¹⁵N Labeling for Studying Protein-Protein Interactions Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Biochemistry-USA31, 6279–6284. 10.1021/bi00142a016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 306

  Hasegawa M. Hosaka T. Kojima K. Nishimura Y. Nakajima Y. Kimura-Someya T. et al (2020). A Unique Clade of Light-Driven Proton-Pumping Rhodopsins Evolved in the Cyanobacterial Lineage. Sci. Rep.10, 16752. 10.1038/s41598-020-73606-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 307

  Hasegawa N. Miki K. Takeda K. (2018). X-ray Structure Analysis of Bacteriorhodopsin at 1.3 Ä Resolution. Sci. Rep.8, 13123. 10.1038/s41598-018-31370-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 308

  Hasemi T. Kikukawa T. Kamo N. Demura M. (2016). Characterization of a Cyanobacterial Chloride-Pumping Rhodopsin and its Conversion into a Proton Pump. J. Biol. Chem.291, 355–362. 10.1074/jbc.m115.688614

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 309

  Hashimoto S. Takeuchi H. Nakagawa M. Tsuda M. (1996). Ultraviolet Resonance Raman Evidence for the Absence of Tyrosinate in octopus Rhodopsin and the Participation of Trp Residues in the Transition to Acid Metarhodopsin. FEBS Lett.398, 239–242. 10.1016/s0014-5793(96)01250-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 310

  Haupts U. Tittor J. Oesterhelt D. (1999). Closing in on Bacteriorhodopsin: Progress in Understanding the Molecule. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.28, 367–399. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.367

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 311

  Havelka W. A. Henderson R. A. Oesterhelt D. (1995). Three-dimensional Structure of Halorhodopsin at 7 Å Resolution. J. Mol. Biol.247, 726–738. 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80151-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 312

  Hayashi M. Kojima K. Sudo Y. Yamashita A. (2021). An Optogenetic Assay Method for Electrogenic Transporters Using Escherichia coli Co-expressing Light-Driven Proton Pump. Protein Sci.30, 2161–2169. 10.1002/pro.4154

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 313

  Hayashi S. Tajkhorshid E. Pebay-Peyroula E. Royant A. Landau E. M. Navarro J. et al (2001). Structural Determinants of Spectral Tuning in Retinal Proteins-Bacteriorhodopsin vs Sensory Rhodopsin II. J. Phys. Chem. B105, 10124–10131. 10.1021/jp011362b

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 314

  Hayashi T. Yasuda S. Suzuki K. Akiyama T. Kanehara K. Kojima K. et al (2020). How Does a Microbial Rhodopsin RxR Realize its Exceptionally High Thermostability with the Proton-Pumping Function Being Retained?J. Phys. Chem. B124, 990–1000. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b10700

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 315

  Heath G. R. Kots E. Robertson J. L. Lansky S. Khelashvili G. Weinstein H. et al (2021). Localization Atomic Force Microscopy. Nature594, 385–390. 10.1038/s41586-021-03551-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 316

  Henderson R. Unwin P. N. T. (1975). Three-dimensional Model of Purple Membrane Obtained by Electron-Microscopy. Nature257, 28–32. 10.1038/257028a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 317

  Herwig L. Rice A. J. Bedbrook C. N. Zhang R. J. K. Lignell A. Cahn J. K. B. et al (2017). Directed Evolution of a Bright Near-Infrared Fluorescent Rhodopsin Using a Synthetic Chromophore. Cell. Chem. Biol.24, 415–425. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.02.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 318

  Herzfeld J. Lansing J. C. (2002). Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Bacteriorhodopsin Pump Cycle. Annu. Rev. Biophysics Biomol. Struct.31, 73–95. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.31.082901.134233

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 319

  Heymann J. B. Müller D. J. Mitsuoka K. Engel A. (1997). Electron and Atomic Force Microscopy of Membrane Proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.7, 543–549. 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80120-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 320

  Hickey D. G. Davies W. I. L. Hughes S. Rodgers J. Thavanesan N. Maclaren R. E. et al (2021). Chimeric Human Opsins as Optogenetic Light Sensitisers. J. Exp. Biol.224, 240580. 10.1242/jeb.240580

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 321

  Higuchi A. Shihoya W. Konno M. Ikuta T. Kandori H. Inoue K. et al (2021). Crystal Structure of Schizorhodopsin Reveals Mechanism of Inward Proton Pumping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118, 2016328118. 10.1073/pnas.2016328118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 322

  Hildebrand P. W. Scheerer P. Park J. H. Choe H.-W. Piechnick R. Ernst O. P. et al (2009). A Ligand Channel through the G Protein Coupled Receptor Opsin. PLoS ONE4, e4382. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004382

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 323

  Hildebrandt V. Polakowski F. Büldt G. (1991). Purple Fission Yeast: Overexpression and Processing of the Pigment Bacteriorhodopsin in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Photochem. Photobiol.54, 1009–1016. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb02123.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 324

  Hillman P. Hochstein S. Minke B. (1983). Transduction in Invertebrate Photoreceptors - Role of Pigment Bistability. Physiol. Rev.63, 668–772. 10.1152/physrev.1983.63.2.668

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 325

  Hirano T. Fujioka N. Imai H. Kandori H. Wada A. Ito M. et al (2006). Assignment of the Vibrational Modes of the Chromophores of Iodopsin and Bathoiodopsin: Low-Temperature Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of ¹³C and ²H-Labeled Iodopsins. Biochemistry45, 1285–1294. 10.1021/bi0517077

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 326

  Hirschi S. Fischer N. Kalbermatter D. Laskowski P. R. Ucurum Z. Müller D. J. et al (2019). Design and Assembly of a Chemically Switchable and Fluorescently Traceable Light-Driven Proton Pump System for Bionanotechnological Applications. Sci. Rep.9, 1046. 10.1038/s41598-018-37260-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 327

  Hirschi S. Kalbermatter D. Ucurum Z. Lemmin T. Fotiadis D. (2021). Cryo-EM Structure and Dynamics of the Green-Light Absorbing Proteorhodopsin. Nat. Commun.12, 4107. 10.1038/s41467-021-24429-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 328

  Hochbaum D. R. Zhao Y. Farhi S. L. Klapoetke N. C. Werley C. A. Kapoor V. et al (2014). All-optical Electrophysiology in Mammalian Neurons Using Engineered Microbial Rhodopsins. Nat. Methods11, 825–833. 10.1038/nmeth.3000

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 329

  Hoffmann A. Hildebrandt V. Heberle J. Büldt G. (1994). Photoactive Mitochondria: In Vivo Transfer of a Light-Driven Proton Pump into the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.91, 9367–9371. 10.1073/pnas.91.20.9367

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 330

  Hofmann K. P. (2000). “Late Photoproducts and Signaling States of Bovine Rhodopsin,” in Molecular Mechanisms in Visual Transduction. Editors StavengaD. G.DeGripW. J.PughJr.E. N. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Pub.), 91–142. 10.1016/s1383-8121(00)80006-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 331

  Hofmann K. P. Scheerer P. Hildebrand P. W. Choe H. W. Park J. H. Heck M. et al (2009). A G Protein-Coupled Receptor at Work: the Rhodopsin Model. Trends Biochem. Sci.34, 540–552. 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.07.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 332

  Hofmann L. Palczewski K. (2015). Advances in Understanding the Molecular Basis of the First Steps in Color Vision. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.49, 46–66. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 333

  Hoi K. K. Bada Juarez J. F. Judge P. J. Yen H.-Y. Wu D. Vinals J. et al (2021). Detergent-free Lipodisq Nanoparticles Facilitate High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry of Folded Integral Membrane Proteins. Nano Lett.21, 2824–2831. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04911

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 334

  Hoischen D. Steinmüller S. Gärtner W. Buss V. Martin H.-D. (1997). Merocyanines as Extremely Bathochromically Absorbing Chromophores in the Halobacterial Membrane Protein Bacteriorhodopsin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.36, 1630–1633.

  • Google Scholar

• 335

  Hong F. T. (1994). “Retinal Proteins in Photovoltaic Devices,” in Molecular and Biomolecular Electronics. Editor BirgeR. R. (Washington, DC, USA: American Chemical Society), 1–27.

  • Google Scholar

• 336

  Hontani Y. Broser M. Luck M. Weissenborn J. Kloz M. Hegemann P. et al (2020). Dual Photoisomerization on Distinct Potential Energy Surfaces in a UV-Absorbing Rhodopsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 11464–11473. 10.1021/jacs.0c03229

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 337

  Hontani Y. Broser M. Silapetere A. Krause B. S. Hegemann P. Kennis J. T. M. (2017a). The Femtosecond-To-Second Photochemistry of Red-Shifted Fast-Closing Anion Channelrhodopsin PsACR1. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 30402–30409. 10.1039/c7cp06414d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 338

  Hontani Y. Ganapathy S. Frehan S. Kloz M. De Grip W. J. Kennis J. T. M. (2019). Photoreaction Dynamics of Red-Shifting Retinal Analogues Reconstituted in Proteorhodopsin. J. Phys. Chem. B123, 4242–4250. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b01136

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 339

  Hontani Y. Ganapathy S. Frehan S. Kloz M. De Grip W. J. Kennis J. T. M. (2018). Strong pH-dependent Near-Infrared Fluorescence in a Microbial Rhodopsin Reconstituted with a Red-Shifting Retinal Analogue. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.9, 6469–6474. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02780

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 340

  Hontani Y. Marazzi M. Stehfest K. Mathes T. Van Stokkum I. H. M. Elstner M. et al (2017b). Reaction Dynamics of the Chimeric Channelrhodopsin C1C2. Sci. Rep.7, 7217. 10.1038/s41598-017-07363-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 341

  Hope A. J. Partridge J. C. Dulai K. S. Hunt D. M. (1997). Mechanisms of Wavelength Tuning in the Rod Opsins of Deep-Sea Fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biological Sci.264, 155–163. 10.1098/rspb.1997.0023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 342

  Hornak V. Ahuja S. Eilers M. Goncalves J. A. Sheves M. Reeves P. J. et al (2010). Light Activation of Rhodopsin: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations Guided by Solid-State NMR Distance Restraints. J. Mol. Biol.396, 510–527. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.12.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 343

  Hosaka T. Nomura T. Kubo M. Nakane T. Fangjia L. Sekine S.-I. et al (2022). Conformational Alterations in Unidirectional Ion Transport of a Light-Driven Chloride Pump Revealed Using X-Ray Free Electron Lasers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.119, e2117433119. 10.1073/pnas.2117433119

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 344

  Hosaka T. Yoshizawa S. Nakajima Y. Ohsawa N. Hato M. Delong E. F. et al (2016). Structural Mechanism for Light-Driven Transport by a New Type of Chloride Ion Pump, Nonlabens Marinus Rhodopsin-3. J. Biol. Chem.291, 17488–17495. 10.1074/jbc.m116.728220

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 345

  Hu J. G. G. Sun B. Q. Q. Bizounok M. Hatcher M. E. Lansing J. C. Raap J. et al (1998). Early and Late M Intermediates in the Bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle: A Solid-State NMR Study. Biochemistry-USA37, 8088–8096. 10.1021/bi973168e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 346

  Huang L. Deng H. Koutalos Y. Ebrey T. G. Groesbeek M. Lugtenburg J. et al (1997). A Resonance Raman Study of the C=C Stretch Modes in Bovine and octopus Visual Pigments with Isotopically Labeled Retinal Chromophores. Photochem. Photobiol.66, 747–754. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb03219.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 347

  Hubbard R. Brown P. K. Bownds M. D. (1971). Methodology of Vitamin A and Visual Pigments. Meth. Enzymol.18C, 615–653. 10.1016/s0076-6879(71)18045-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 348

  Hubbard R. Wald G. (1952). Cis-trans Isomers of Vitamin A and Retinene in the Rhodopsin System. J. General Physiology36, 269–315. 10.1085/jgp.36.2.269

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 349

  Hubbell W. L. Altenbach C. Hubbell C. M. Khorana H. G. (2003). Rhodopsin Structure, Dynamics, and Activation: A Perspective from Crystallography, Site-Directed Spin Labeling, Sulfhydryl Reactivity, and Disulfide Cross-Linking. Adv. Protein Chem.63, 243–290. 10.1016/s0065-3233(03)63010-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 350

  Humphreys I. R. Pei J. M. Baek M. Krishnakumar A. Anishchenko I. Ovchinnikov S. et al (2021). Computed Structures of Core Eukaryotic Protein Complexes. Science374, 1340.

  • Google Scholar

• 351

  Hunt D. M. Collin S. P. (2014). “The Evolution of Photoreceptors and Visual Photopigments in Vertebrates,” in Evolution of Visual and Non-visual Pigments. Editor HuntD. M. (New York: Springer Science+Business Media New York), 163–217. 10.1007/978-1-4614-4355-1_6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 352

  Hunt D. M. Dulai K. S. Partridge J. C. Cottrill P. Bowmaker J. K. (2001). The Molecular Basis for Spectral Tuning of Rod Visual Pigments in Deep-Sea Fish. J. Exp. Biol.204, 3333–3344. 10.1242/jeb.204.19.3333

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 353

  Hussain H. Du Y. Scull N. J. Mortensen J. S. Tarrasch J. Bae H. E. et al (2016). Accessible Mannitol-Based Amphiphiles (MNAs) for Membrane Protein Solubilisation and Stabilisation. Chemistry-A Eur. J.22, 7068–7073. 10.1002/chem.201600533

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 354

  Hussain S. Kinnebrew M. Schonenbach N. S. Aye E. Han S. G. (2015). Functional Consequences of the Oligomeric Assembly of Proteorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol.427, 1278–1290. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.01.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 355

  Hwa J. Reeves P. J. Klein-Seetharaman J. Davidson F. F. Khorana H. G. (1999). Structure and Function in Rhodopsin: Further Elucidation of the Role of the Intradiscal Cysteines, Cys-110, -185, and -187, in Rhodopsin Folding and Function. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.96, 1932–1935. 10.1073/pnas.96.5.1932

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 356

  Iizuka A. Kajimoto K. Fujisawa T. Tsukamoto T. Aizawa T. Kamo N. et al (2019). Functional Importance of the Oligomer Formation of the Cyanobacterial H+ Pump Gloeobacter Rhodopsin. Sci. Rep.9, 10711. 10.1038/s41598-019-47178-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 357

  Ikeda D. Furutani Y. Kandori H. (2007). FTIR Study of the Retinal Schiff Base and Internal Water Molecules of Proteorhodopsin. Biochemistry46, 5365–5373. 10.1021/bi700143g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 358

  Ikuta T. Shihoya W. Sugiura M. Yoshida K. Watari M. Tokano T. et al (2020). Structural Insights into the Mechanism of Rhodopsin Phosphodiesterase. Nat. Commun.11, 5605. 10.1038/s41467-020-19376-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 359

  Imai H. Hirano T. Terakita A. Shichida Y. Muthyala R. S. Chen R.-L. et al (1999). Probing for the Threshold Energy for Visual Transduction: Red-Shifted Visual Pigment Analogs from 3-Methoxy-3-Dehydroretinal and Related Compounds. Photochem. Photobiol.70, 111–115. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb01956.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 360

  Imai H. Imamoto Y. Yoshizawa T. Shichida Y. (1995). Difference in Molecular Properties between Chicken Green and Rhodopsin as Related to the Functional Difference between Cone and Rod Photoreceptor Cells. Biochemistry-USA34, 10525–10531. 10.1021/bi00033a026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 361

  Imai H. Terakita A. Tachibanaki S. Imamoto Y. Yoshizawa T. Shichida Y. (1997). Photochemical and Biochemical Properties of Chicken Blue- Sensitive Cone Visual Pigment. Biochemistry-USA36, 12773–12779. 10.1021/bi970809x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 362

  Imai Y. Inoshita T. Meng H. R. Shiba-Fukushima K. Hara K. Y. Sawamura N. et al (2019). Light-driven Activation of Mitochondrial Proton-Motive Force Improves Motor Behaviors in a Drosophila Model of Parkinson's Disease. Commun. Biol.2, 424. 10.1038/s42003-019-0674-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 363

  Imamoto Y. Kandori H. Okano T. Fukada Y. Shichida Y. Yoshizawa T. (1989). Effect of Chloride Ion on the Thermal Decay Process of the Batho Intermediate of Iodopsin at Low Temperature. Biochemistry28, 9412–9416. 10.1021/bi00450a025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 364

  Imamoto Y. Shichida Y. (2014). Cone Visual Pigments. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 664–673. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.08.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 365

  Imamoto Y. Yoshizawa T. Shichida Y. (1996). Chromophore Configuration of Iodopsin and its Photoproducts Formed at Low Temperatures. Biochemistry35, 14599–14607. 10.1021/bi9614850

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 366

  Imasheva E. S. Balashov S. P. Wang J. M. Lanyi J. K. (2011). Removal and Reconstitution of the Carotenoid Antenna of Xanthorhodopsin. J. Membr. Biol.239, 95–104. 10.1007/s00232-010-9322-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 367

  Inagaki H. K. Jung Y. Hoopfer E. D. Wong A. M. Mishra N. Lin J. Y. et al (2014). Optogenetic Control of Drosophila Using a Red-Shifted Channelrhodopsin Reveals Experience-dependent Influences on Courtship. Nat. Methods11, 325–U311. 10.1038/nmeth.2765

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 368

  Inoue K. Del Carmen Marin M. Tomida S. Nakamura R. Nakajima Y. Olivucci M. et al (2019). Red-shifting Mutation of Light-Driven Sodium-Pump Rhodopsin. Nat. Commun.10, 1993. 10.1038/s41467-019-10000-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 369

  Inoue K. Karasuyama M. Nakamura R. Konno M. Yamada D. Mannen K. et al (2021). Exploration of Natural Red-Shifted Rhodopsins Using a Machine Learning-Based Bayesian Experimental Design. Commun. Biol.4, 362. 10.1038/s42003-021-01878-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 370

  Inoue K. Nomura Y. Kandori H. (2016). Asymmetric Functional Conversion of Eubacterial Light-Driven Ion Pumps. J. Biol. Chem.291, 9883–9893. 10.1074/jbc.m116.716498

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 371

  Inoue K. Reissig L. Sakai M. Kobayashi S. Homma M. Fujii M. et al (2012). Absorption Spectra and Photochemical Reactions in a Unique Photoactive Protein, Middle Rhodopsin MR. J. Phys. Chem. B116, 5888–5899. 10.1021/jp302357m

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 372

  Inoue K. Sasaki J. Morisaki M. Tokunaga F. Terazima M. (2004). Time-resolved Detection of Sensory Rhodopsin II-Transducer Interaction. Biophysical J.87, 2587–2597. 10.1529/biophysj.104.043521

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 373

  Inoue K. Sudo Y. Homma M. Kandori H. (2011). Spectrally Silent Intermediates during the Photochemical Reactions of Salinibacter Sensory Rhodopsin I. J. Phys. Chem. B115, 4500–4508. 10.1021/jp2000706

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 374

  Inoue K. Tahara S. Kato Y. Takeuchi S. Tahara T. Kandori H. (2018). Spectroscopic Study of Proton-Transfer Mechanism of Inward Proton-Pump Rhodopsin, Parvularcula Oceani Xenorhodopsin. J. Phys. Chem. B122, 6453–6461. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b01279

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 375

  Inoue K. Tsukamoto T. Shimono K. Suzuki Y. Miyauchi S. Hayashi S. et al (2015). Converting a Light-Driven Proton Pump into a Light-Gated Proton Channel. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 3291–3299. 10.1021/ja511788f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 376

  Inoue K. Tsukamoto T. Sudo Y. (2014). Molecular and Evolutionary Aspects of Microbial Sensory Rhodopsins. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 562–577. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.05.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 377

  Inoue K. Tsunoda S. P. Singh M. Tomida S. Hososhima S. Konno M. et al (2020). Schizorhodopsins: A Family of Rhodopsins from Asgard Archaea that Function as Light-Driven Inward H+ Pumps. Sci. Adv.6, 2441. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz2441

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 378

  Ito S. Iwaki M. Sugita S. Abe-Yoshizumi R. Iwata T. Inoue K. et al (2018). Unique Hydrogen Bonds in Membrane Protein Monitored by Whole Mid-IR ATR Spectroscopy in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. B122, 165–170. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11064

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 379

  Iwasa T. Colmenares L. U. Hirata K. Arime Y. Nakagawa M. Kikkawa S. et al (1998). ¹⁹F-NMR and UV-Vis Absorption Spectroscopic Studies of Fluorinated octopus Rhodopsin and its Photoproducts. J. Phys. Chem. A102, 5602–5610. 10.1021/jp9802477

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 380

  Iyer E. S. S. Misra R. Maity A. Liubashevski O. Sudo Y. Sheves M. et al (2016). Temperature Independence of Ultrafast Photoisomerization in Thermophilic Rhodopsin: Assessment versus Other Microbial Proton Pumps. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 12401–12407. 10.1021/jacs.6b05002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 381

  Jacobs G. H. (2018). Photopigments and the Dimensionality of Animal Color Vision. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.86, 108–130. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.12.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 382

  Jäger S. Lewis J. W. Zvyaga T. A. Szundi I. Sakmar T. P. Kliger D. S. (1997). Chromophore Structural Changes in Rhodopsin from Nanoseconds to Microseconds Following Pigment Photolysis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.94, 8557–8562. 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8557

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 383

  Jana S. Jung K. H. Sheves M. (2020). The Chirality Origin of Retinal-Carotenoid Complex in Gloeobacter Rhodopsin: a Temperature-dependent Excitonic Coupling. Sci. Rep.10, 13992. 10.1038/s41598-020-70697-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 384

  Janknecht R. Demartynoff G. Lou J. Hipskind R. A. Nordheim A. Stunnenberg H. G. (1991). Rapid and Efficient Purification of Native Histidine-Tagged Protein Expressed by Recombinant Vaccinia Virus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.88, 8972–8976. 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8972

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 385

  Janssen J. J. M. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Merkx M. DeGrip W. J. (1995). Histidine Tagging Both Allows Convenient Single-step Purification of Bovine Rhodopsin and Exerts Ionic Strength-dependent Effects on its Photochemistry. J. Biol. Chem.270, 11222–11229. 10.1074/jbc.270.19.11222

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 386

  Janssen J. J. M. Mulder W. R. DeCaluwé G. L. J. Vlak J. M. DeGrip W. J. (1991). In Vitro expression of Bovine Opsin Using Recombinant Baculovirus: The Role of Glutamic Acid (134) in Opsin Biosynthesis and Glycosylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1089, 68–76. 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90086-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 387

  Janssen J. J. M. VandeVen W. J. M. VanGroningen-Luyben W. a. H. M. Roosien J. Vlak J. M. DeGrip W. J. (1988). Synthesis of Functional Bovine Opsin in Insect Cells under Control of the Baculovirus Polyhedrin Promotor. Mol. Biol. Rep.13, 65–71. 10.1007/bf00539052

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 388

  Janssen J. W. H. David-Gray Z. K. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Nevo E. Foster R. G. DeGrip W. J. (2003). A Green Cone-like Pigment in the 'blind' Mole-Rat Spalax Ehrenbergi: Functional Expression and Photochemical Characterization. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.2, 1287–1291. 10.1039/b300059c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 389

  Jastrzebska B. Palczewski K. Golczak M. (2011). Role of Bulk Water in Hydrolysis of the Rhodopsin Chromophore. J. Biol. Chem.286, 18930–18937. 10.1074/jbc.m111.234583

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 390

  Ji L. L. Ma B. F. Meng Q. Li L. J. Liu K. Chen D. L. (2017). Detergent-resistant Oligomeric Leptosphaeria Rhodopsin Is a Promising Bio-Nanomaterial and an Alternative to Bacteriorhodopsin. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun.493, 352–357. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.09.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 391

  Jiang M. S. Pandey S. Fong H. K. W. (1993). An Opsin Homologue in the Retina and Pigment Epithelium. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.34, 3669–3678.

  • Google Scholar

• 392

  Johnson P. J. M. Halpin A. Morizumi T. Brown L. S. Prokhorenko V. I. Ernst O. P. et al (2014). The Photocycle and Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Bacteriorhodopsin in Lipid Nanodiscs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 21310–21320. 10.1039/c4cp01826e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 393

  Johnson P. J. M. Halpin A. Morizumi T. Prokhorenko V. I. Ernst O. P. Miller R. J. D. (2015). Local Vibrational Coherences Drive the Primary Photochemistry of Vision. Nat. Chem.7, 980–986. 10.1038/nchem.2398

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 394

  Jumper J. Evans R. Pritzel A. Green T. Figurnov M. Ronneberger O. et al (2021). Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold. Nature596, 583–589. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 395

  Jun N. Y. Cardin J. A. (2020). Activation of Distinct Channelrhodopsin Variants Engages Different Patterns of Network Activity. Eneuro7, 0222–0218. 10.1523/ENEURO.0222-18.2019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 396

  Kahremany S. Sander C. L. Tochtrop G. P. Kubas A. Palczewski K. (2019). Z-isomerization of Retinoids through Combination of Monochromatic Photoisomerization and Metal Catalysis. Org. Biomol. Chem.17, 8125–8139. 10.1039/c9ob01645g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 397

  Kandori H. Inoue K. Tsunoda S. P. (2018). Light-Driven Sodium-Pumping Rhodopsin: A New Concept of Active Transport. Chem. Rev.118, 10646–10658. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00548

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 398

  Kandori H. (2020). Retinal Proteins: Photochemistry and Optogenetics. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.93, 76–85. 10.1246/bcsj.20190292

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 399

  Kanehara K. Yoshizawa S. Tsukamoto T. Sudo Y. (2017). A Phylogenetically Distinctive and Extremely Heat Stable Light-Driven Proton Pump from the Eubacterium Rubrobacter Xylanophilus DSM 9941^T. Sci. Rep.7, 44427. 10.1038/srep44427

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 400

  Kaneko A. Inoue K. Kojima K. Kandori H. Sudo Y. (2017). Conversion of Microbial Rhodopsins: Insights into Functionally Essential Elements and Rational Protein Engineering. Biophys. Rev.9, 861–876. 10.1007/s12551-017-0335-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 401

  Kannan M. Vasan G. Pieribone V. A. (2019). Optimizing Strategies for Developing Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators. Front. Cell. Neurosci.13, 53. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00053

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 402

  Kao Y.-M. Cheng C.-H. Syue M.-L. Huang H.-Y. Chen I.-C. Yu T.-Y. et al (2019). Photochemistry of Bacteriorhodopsin with Various Oligomeric Statuses in Controlled Membrane Mimicking Environments: A Spectroscopic Study from Femtoseconds to Milliseconds. J. Phys. Chem. B123, 2032–2039. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b01224

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 403

  Karapinar R. Schwitalla J. C. Eickelbeck D. Pakusch J. Mücher B. Grömmke M. et al (2021). Reverse Optogenetics of G Protein Signaling by Zebrafish Non-visual Opsin Opn7b for Synchronization of Neuronal Networks. Nat. Commun.12, 4488. 10.1038/s41467-021-24718-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 404

  Karasuyama M. Inoue K. Nakamura R. Kandori H. Takeuchi I. (2018). Understanding Colour Tuning Rules and Predicting Absorption Wavelengths of Microbial Rhodopsins by Data-Driven Machine-Learning Approach. Sci. Rep.8, 15580–15511. 10.1038/s41598-018-33984-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 405

  Karnik S. S. Ridge K. D. Bhattacharya S. S. Khorana H. G. (1993). Palmitoylation of Bovine Opsin and its Cysteine Mutants in COS Cells. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.90, 40–44. 10.1073/pnas.90.1.40

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 406

  Karnik S. S. Sakmar T. P. Chen H.-B. Khorana H. G. (1988). Cysteine Residues 110 and 187 Are Essential for the Formation of Correct Structure in Bovine Rhodopsin. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.85, 8459–8463. 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8459

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 407

  Katana R. Guan C. L. Zanini D. Larsen M. E. Giraldo D. Geurten B. R. H. et al (2019). Chromophore-Independent Roles of Opsin Apoproteins in Drosophila Mechanoreceptors. Curr. Biol.29, 2961–2969. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.036

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 408

  Katanosaka K. Tokunaga F. Kawamura S. Ozaki K. (1998). N-linked Glycosylation of Drosophila Rhodopsin Occurs Exclusively in the Amino-Terminal Domain and Functions in Rhodopsin Maturation. FEBS Lett.424, 149–154. 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00160-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 409

  Kataoka C. Inoue K. Katayama K. Béjà O. Kandori H. (2019). Unique Photochemistry Observed in a New Microbial Rhodopsin. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 5117–5121. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01957

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 410

  Katayama K. Furutani Y. Imai H. Kandori H. (2012). Protein-bound Water Molecules in Primate Red- and Green-Sensitive Visual Pigments. Biochemistry51, 1126–1133. 10.1021/bi201676y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 411

  Katayama K. Gulati S. Ortega J. T. Alexander N. S. Sun W. Y. Shenouda M. M. et al (2019). Specificity of the Chromophore-Binding Site in Human Cone Opsins. J. Biol. Chem.294, 6082–6093. 10.1074/jbc.ra119.007587

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 412

  Katayama K. Nonaka Y. Tsutsui K. Imai H. Kandori H. (2017). Spectral Tuning Mechanism of Primate Blue-Sensitive Visual Pigment Elucidated by FTIR Spectroscopy. Sci. Rep.7, 4904. 10.1038/s41598-017-05177-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 413

  Kathe C. Michoud F. Schönle P. Rowald A. Brun N. Ravier J. et al (2021). Wireless Closed-Loop Optogenetics across the Entire Dorsoventral Spinal Cord in Mice. Nat. Biotechnol.40, 198. 10.1038/s41587-021-01019-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 414

  Kato H. E. Inoue K. Abe-Yoshizumi R. Kato Y. Ono H. Konno M. et al (2015). Structural Basis for Na+ Transport Mechanism by a Light-Driven Na+ Pump. Nature521, 48–53. 10.1038/nature14322

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 415

  Kato H. E. Kamiya M. Sugo S. Ito J. Taniguchi R. Orito A. et al (2015). Atomistic Design of Microbial Opsin-Based Blue-Shifted Optogenetics Tools. Nat. Commun.6, 7177. 10.1038/ncomms8177

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 416

  Kato H. E. Zhang F. Yizhar O. Ramakrishnan C. Nishizawa T. Hirata K. et al (2012). Crystal Structure of the Channelrhodopsin Light-Gated Cation Channel. Nature482, 369–374. 10.1038/nature10870

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 417

  Katz B. Minke B. (2009). Drosophila Photoreceptors and Signaling Mechanisms. Front. Cell. Neurosci.3, 2. 10.3389/neuro.03.002.2009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 418

  Kaufmann J. C. D. Krause B. S. Adam S. Ritter E. Schapiro I. Hegemann P. et al (2020). Modulation of Light Energy Transfer from Chromophore to Protein in the Channelrhodopsin ReaChR. Biophysical J.119, 705–716. 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.06.031

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 419

  Kaur J. Kriebel C. N. Eberhardt P. Jakdetchai O. Leeder A. J. Weber I. et al (2019). Solid-state NMR Analysis of the Sodium Pump Krokinobacter Rhodopsin 2 and its H30A Mutant. J. Struct. Biol.206, 55–65. 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.06.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 420

  Kaushal S. Ridge K. D. Khorana H. G. (1994). Structure and Function in Rhodopsin: The Role of Asparagine-Linked Glycosylation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.91, 4024–4028. 10.1073/pnas.91.9.4024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 421

  Kawamura I. Seki H. Tajima S. Makino Y. Shigeta A. Okitsu T. et al (2021). Structure of a Retinal Chromophore of Dark-Adapted Middle Rhodopsin as Studied by Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Biophysics Physicobiology18, 177–185. 10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 422

  Kawamura S. Gerstung M. Colozo A. T. Helenius J. Maeda A. Beerenwinkel N. et al (2013). Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Differences between Dark-State Rhodopsin and Opsin. Structure21, 426–437. 10.1016/j.str.2013.01.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 423

  Kawanabe A. Furutani Y. Jung K.-H. Kandori H. (2007). Photochromism of Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc.129, 8644–8649. 10.1021/ja072085a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 424

  Kawasaki Y. Konno M. Inoue K. (2021). Thermostable Light-Driven Inward Proton Pump Rhodopsins. Chem. Phys. Lett.779, 138868. 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.138868

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 425

  Kazmi M. A. Dubin R. A. Oddoux C. Ostrer H. (1996). High-level Inducible Expression of Visual Pigments in Transfected Cells. BioTechniques21, 304–311. 10.2144/96212rr05

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 426

  Kazmin R. Rose A. Szczepek M. Elgeti M. Ritter E. Piechnick R. et al (2015). The Activation Pathway of Human Rhodopsin in Comparison to Bovine Rhodopsin. J. Biol. Chem.290, 20117–20127. 10.1074/jbc.m115.652172

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 427

  Khelashvili G. Menon A. K. (2022). Phospholipid Scrambling by G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Annu. Rev. Biophysics51, 39–61. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-090821-083030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 428

  Khodonov A. A. Shevyakov S. V. Mironova E. V. Shvets V. I. Alexeeva S. G. Demina O. V. et al (2000). Bacteriorhodopsin Analogs, Bearing Modified Chromophore as a Basis for the Photochromic Materials. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.345, 641–646. 10.1080/10587250008023938

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 429

  Khorana H. G. Braiman M. S. Chao B. H. Doi T. Flitsch S. L. Gilles-Gonzalez M. A. et al (1987). Site-specific Mutagenesis in Structure - Function Studies of Bacteriorhodopsin. Chem. Scr.27B, 137–147.

  • Google Scholar

• 430

  Khorana H. G. Knox B. E. Nasi E. Swanson R. Thompson D. A. (1988). Expression of a Bovine Rhodopsin Gene in Xenopus Oocytes: Demonstration of Light-dependent Ionic Currents. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.85, 7917–7921. 10.1073/pnas.85.21.7917

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 431

  Khorana H. G. (1979). Total Synthesis of a Gene. Science203, 614–625. 10.1126/science.366749

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 432

  Kikukawa T. (2021). Unique Cl^- Pump Rhodopsin with Close Similarity to H⁺ Pump Rhodopsin. Biophysics Physicobiology18, 317–326. 10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 433

  Kim H.-J. Kwon Y. D. Lee S. Y. Kim P. (2012). An Engineered Escherichia coli Having a High Intracellular Level of ATP and Enhanced Recombinant Protein Production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.94, 1079–1086. 10.1007/s00253-011-3779-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 434

  Kim H. A. Kim H. J. Park J. Choi A. R. Heo K. Jeong H. et al (2017). An Evolutionary Optimization of a Rhodopsin-Based Phototrophic Metabolism in Escherichia coli. Microb. Cell. Factories16, 111. 10.1186/s12934-017-0725-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 435

  Kim S.-Y. Waschuk S. A. Brown L. S. Jung K.-H. (2008). Screening and Characterization of Proteorhodopsin Color-Tuning Mutations in Escherichia coli with Endogenous Retinal Synthesis. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1777, 504–513. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.03.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 436

  Kimura Y. Vassylyev D. G. Miyazawa A. Kidera A. Matsushima M. Mitsuoka K. et al (1997). High Resolution Structure of Bacteriorhodopsin Determined by Electron Crystallography. Photochem. Photobiol.66, 764–767. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb03221.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 437

  Kirchman D. L. Hanson T. E. (2013). Bioenergetics of Photoheterotrophic Bacteria in the Oceans. Environ. Microbiol. Rep.5, 188–199. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00367.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 438

  Kishi K. E. Kim Y. S. Fukuda M. Inoue M. Kusakizako T. Wang P. Y. et al (2022). Structural Basis for Channel Conduction in the Pump-like Channelrhodopsin ChRmine. Cell.185, 1–18. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 439

  Klaassen C. H. W. DeGrip W. J. (2000). Baculovirus Expression System for Expression and Characterization of Functional Recombinant Visual Pigments. Meth. Enzymol.315, 12–29. 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)15832-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 440

  Klapoetke N. C. Murata Y. Kim S. S. Pulver S. R. Birdsey-Benson A. Cho Y. K. et al (2014). Independent Optical Excitation of Distinct Neural Populations. Nat. Methods11, 338–U333. 10.1038/nmeth.2836

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 441

  Klyszejko A. L. Shastri S. Mari S. A. Grubmüller H. Müller D. J. Glaubitz C. (2008). Folding and Assembly of Proteorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol.376, 35–41. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 442

  Knoot C. J. Ungerer J. Wangikar P. P. Pakrasi H. B. (2018). Cyanobacteria: Promising Biocatalysts for Sustainable Chemical Production. J. Biol. Chem.293, 5044–5052. 10.1074/jbc.r117.815886

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 443

  Knowles T. J. Finka R. Smith C. Lin Y.-P. Dafforn T. Overduin M. (2009). Membrane Proteins Solubilized Intact in Lipid Containing Nanoparticles Bounded by Styrene Maleic Acid Copolymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131, 7484–7485. 10.1021/ja810046q

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 444

  Knudsen P. Hubbell W. L. (1978). Stability of Rhodopsin in Detergent Solutions. Membr. Biochem.1, 297–322. 10.3109/09687687809063853

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 445

  Kochendoerfer G. G. Lin S. W. Sakmar T. P. Mathies R. A. (1999). How Color Visual Pigments Are Tuned. Trends biochem. Sci.24, 300–305. 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01432-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 446

  Kojima D. Imai H. Okano T. Fukada Y. Crescitelli F. Yoshizawa T. et al (1995). Purification and Low Temperature Spectroscopy of Gecko Visual Pigments Green and Blue. Biochemistry-USA34, 1096–1106. 10.1021/bi00003a047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 447

  Kojima D. Oura T. Hisatomi O. Tokunaga F. Fukada Y. Yoshizawa T. et al (1996). Molecular Properties of Chimerical Mutants of Gecko Blue and Bovine Rhodopsin. Biochemistry35, 2625–2629. 10.1021/bi9511548

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 448

  Kojima D. Terakita A. Ishikawa T. Tsukahara Y. Maeda A. Shichida Y. (1997). A Novel Go-Mediated Phototransduction Cascade in Scallop Visual Cells. J. Biol. Chem.272, 22979–22982. 10.1074/jbc.272.37.22979

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 449

  Kojima K. Kurihara R. Sakamoto M. Takanashi T. Kuramochi H. Zhang X. M. et al (2020a). Comparative Studies of the Fluorescence Properties of Microbial Rhodopsins: Spontaneous Emission versus Photointermediate Fluorescence. J. Phys. Chem. B124, 7361–7367. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c06560

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 450

  Kojima K. Miyoshi N. Shibukawa A. Chowdhury S. Tsujimura M. Noji T. et al (2020c). Green-sensitive, Long-Lived, Step-Functional Anion Channelrhodopsin-2 Variant as a High-Potential Neural Silencing Tool. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 6214–6218. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01406

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 451

  Kojima K. Shibukawa A. Sudo Y. (2020b). The Unlimited Potential of Microbial Rhodopsins as Optical Tools. Biochemistry59, 218–229. 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00768

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 452

  Kojima K. Ueta T. Noji T. Saito K. Kanehara K. Yoshizawa S. et al (2020d). Vectorial Proton Transport Mechanism of RxR, a Phylogenetically Distinct and Thermally Stable Microbial Rhodopsin. Sci. Rep.10, 282. 10.1038/s41598-019-57122-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 453

  Konno M. Inoue K. Kandori H. (2021). Ion Transport Activity Assay for Microbial Rhodopsin Expressed in Escherichia coli Cells. Bio-Protocol11, 4115. 10.21769/bioprotoc.4115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 454

  Kopf A. H. Dörr J. M. Koorengevel M. C. Antoniciello F. Jahn H. Killian J. A. (2020). Factors Influencing the Solubilization of Membrane Proteins from Escherichia coli Membranes by Styrene-Maleic Acid Copolymers. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes1862, 183125. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183125

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 455

  Kovalev K. Astashkin R. Gushchin I. Orekhov P. Volkov D. Zinovev E. V. et al (2020a). Molecular Mechanism of Light-Driven Sodium Pumping. Nat. Commun.11, 21371. 10.1038/s41467-020-16032-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 456

  Kovalev K. Polovinkin V. Gushchin I. Alekseev A. Shevchenko V. Borshchevskiy V. et al (2019). Structure and Mechanisms of Sodium-Pumping KR2 Rhodopsin. Sci. Adv.5, eaav2671. 10.1126/sciadv.aav2671

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 457

  Kovalev K. Volkov D. Astashkin R. Alekseev A. Gushchin I. Haro-Moreno J. M. et al (2020b). High-resolution Structural Insights into the Heliorhodopsin Family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.117, 4131–4141. 10.1073/pnas.1915888117

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 458

  Koyanagi M. Terakita A. (2014). Diversity of Animal Opsin-Based Pigments and Their Optogenetic Potential. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 710–716. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.09.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 459

  Kraack J. P. Buckup T. Motzkus M. (2011). Vibrational Analysis of Excited and Ground Electronic States of All-Trans Retinal Protonated Schiff-Bases. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 21402–21410. 10.1039/c1cp22245g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 460

  Krah M. Marwan W. Verméglio A. Oesterhelt D. (1994). Phototaxis of Halobacterium Salinarium Requires a Signalling Complex of Sensory Rhodopsin I and its Methyl-Accepting Transducer HtrI. EMBO J.13, 2150–2155. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06491.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 461

  Kralj J. M. Douglass A. D. Hochbaum D. R. Maclaurin D. Cohen A. E. (2012). Optical Recording of Action Potentials in Mammalian Neurons Using a Microbial Rhodopsin. Nat. Methods9, 90–95. 10.1038/nmeth.1782

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 462

  Kralj J. M. Hochbaum D. R. Douglass A. D. Cohen A. E. (2011). Electrical Spiking in Escherichia coli Probed with a Fluorescent Voltage-Indicating Protein. Science333, 345–348. 10.1126/science.1204763

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 463

  Krebs A. Edwards P. C. Villa C. Li J.-D. Schertler G. F. X. (2003). The Three-Dimensional Structure of Bovine Rhodopsin Determined by Electron Cryomicroscopy. J. Biol. Chem.278, 50217–50225. 10.1074/jbc.M307995200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 464

  Krebs M. P. Mollaaghababa R. Khorana H. G. (1993). Gene Replacement in Halobacterium Halobium and Expression of Bacteriorhodopsin Mutants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.90, 1987–1991. 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1987

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 465

  Krol A. Lopez-Huerta V. G. Corey T. E. C. Deisseroth K. Ting J. T. Feng G. P. (2019). Two eARCHT3.0 Lines for Optogenetic Silencing of Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Neurons. Front. Neural Circuits13, 4. 10.3389/fncir.2019.00004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 466

  Kropf A. (1982). A New Detergent for the Study of Visual Pigments. Vis. Res.22, 495–497. 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90199-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 467

  Kropf A. (1975). The Nature of the Chromophore-Protein Interaction in Visual Pigments as Studied by Visual Pigment Analogues. Abstr. Annu. Meet. Biophysical Soc. Jpn.31, 281–282.

  • Google Scholar

• 468

  Kropf A. Whittenberger B. P. Goff S. P. Waggoner A. S. (1973). The Spectral Properties of Some Visual Pigment Analogs. Exp. Eye Res.17, 591–606. 10.1016/0014-4835(73)90088-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 469

  Kuang L. J. Fernandes D. A. O'halloran M. Zheng W. Jiang Y. J. Ladizhansky V. et al (2014). Frozen" Block Copolymer Nanomembranes with Light-Driven Proton Pumping Performance. ACS Nano8, 537–545. 10.1021/nn4059852

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 470

  Kühn H. (1984). Interactions between Photoexcited Rhodopsin and Light-Activated Enzymes in Rods. Prog. Retin. Res.3, 123–156.

  • Google Scholar

• 471

  Kuhne J. Eisenhauer K. Ritter E. Hegemann P. Gerwert K. Bartl F. J. (2015). Early Formation of the Ion-Conducting Pore in Channelrhodopsin-2. Angew. Chemie-International Ed.54, 4953–4957. 10.1002/anie.201410180

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 472

  Kuhne J. Vierock J. Tennigkeit S. A. Dreier M.-A. Wietek J. Petersen D. et al (2019). Unifying Photocycle Model for Light Adaptation and Temporal Evolution of Cation Conductance in Channelrhodopsin-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.116, 9380–9389. 10.1073/pnas.1818707116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 473

  Kulkarni R. U. Miller E. W. (2017). Voltage Imaging: Pitfalls and Potential. Biochemistry56, 5171–5177. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00490

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 474

  Kumbalasiri T. Provencio I. (2005). Melanopsin and Other Novel Mammalian Opsins. Exp. Eye Res.81, 368–375. 10.1016/j.exer.2005.05.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 475

  Kushibiki T. Okawa S. Hirasawa T. Ishihara M. (2014). Optogenetics: Novel Tools for Controlling Mammalian Cell Functions with Light. Int. J. Photoenergy2014, 895039. 10.1155/2014/895039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 476

  Kusnetzow A. K. Altenbach C. Hubbell W. L. (2006). Conformational States and Dynamics of Rhodopsin in Micelles and Bilayers. Biochemistry-USA45, 5538–5550. 10.1021/bi060101v

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 477

  Kusnetzow A. K. Dukkipati A. Babu K. R. Ramos L. Knox B. E. Birge R. R. (2004). Vertebrate Ultraviolet Visual Pigments: Protonation of the Retinylidene Schiff Base and a Counterion Switch during Photoactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101, 941–946. 10.1073/pnas.0305206101

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 478

  Kusnetzow A. K. Dukkipati A. Babu K. R. Singh D. Vought B. W. Knox B. E. et al (2001). The Photobleaching Sequence of a Short-Wavelength Visual Pigment. Biochemistry40, 7832–7844. 10.1021/bi010387y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 479

  Kwon S.-K. Jun S.-H. Kim J. F. (2020). Omega Rhodopsins: A Versatile Class of Microbial Rhodopsins. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.30, 633–641. 10.4014/jmb.1912.12010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 480

  Kwon Y. M. Patra A. K. Chiura H. X. Kim S.-J. (2019). Production of Extracellular Vesicles with Light-Induced Proton Pump Activity by Proteorhodopsin-Containing Marine Bacteria. MicrobiologyOpen8, e808. 10.1002/mbo3.808

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 481

  Ladizhansky V. (2017). “Advances in Solid-State NMR Studies of Microbial Rhodopsins,” in Modern Magnetic Resonance. Editor WebbG. A. (New York City: Springer International Publishing AG), 1–19. 10.1007/978-3-319-28275-6_65-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 482

  Lamarche L. B. Kumar R. P. Trieu M. M. Devine E. L. Cohen-Abeles L. E. Theobald D. L. et al (2017). Purification and Characterization of RhoPDE, a Retinylidene/Phosphodiesterase Fusion Protein and Potential Optogenetic Tool from the Choanoflagellate Salpingoeca Rosetta. Biochemistry56, 5812–5822. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00519

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 483

  Lan Y. Wang Y. Lu H. (2020). Opsin 3 Is a Key Regulator of Ultraviolet A-Induced Photoageing in Human Dermal Fibroblast Cells. Br. J. Dermatology182, 1228–1244. 10.1111/bjd.18410

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 484

  Lang-Hinrichs C. Queck I. Büldt G. Stahl U. Hildebrandt V. (1994). The Archaebacterial Membrane Protein Bacterio-Opsin Is Expressed and N-Terminally Processed in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet.244, 183–188. 10.1007/bf00283521

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 485

  Lanyi J. K. (2004). Bacteriorhodopsin. Annu. Rev. Physiology66, 665–688. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.032102.150049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 486

  Larkum A. W. D. Ritchie R. J. Raven J. A. (2018). Living off the Sun: Chlorophylls, Bacteriochlorophylls and Rhodopsins. Photosynthetica56, 11–43. 10.1007/s11099-018-0792-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 487

  Lavington S. Watts A. (2020). Lipid Nanoparticle Technologies for the Study of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Lipid Environments. Biophys. Rev.12, 1287–1302. 10.1007/s12551-020-00775-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 488

  Lee H. J. Huang K.-C. Mei G. X. Mamaeva N. DeGrip W. J. Rothschild K. J. et al (2019). “Pre-resonance Stimulated Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Imaging of Membrane Potential Using Near-Infrared Rhodopsins,” in Multiphoton Microscopy in the Biomedical Sciences. Editors PeriasamyM.SoP. T. C.KönigK. (Bellingham, U.S.A: SPIE), 81. 10.1117/12.2506833

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 489

  Lee S. Ghosh S. Jana S. Robertson N. Tate C. G. Vaidehi N. (2020). How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?Biochemistry59, 2125–2134. 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00183

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 490

  Lehtinen K. Nokia M. S. Takala H. (2022). Red Light Optogenetics in Neuroscience. Front. Cell. Neurosci.15, 778900. 10.3389/fncel.2021.778900

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 491

  Lesca E. Panneels V. Schertler G. F. X. (2018). The Role of Water Molecules in Phototransduction of Retinal Proteins and G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Faraday Discuss.207, 27–37. 10.1039/c7fd00207f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 492

  Leung N. Y. Montell C. (2017). Unconventional Roles of Opsins. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol.33, 241–264. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060432

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 493

  Leung N. Y. Thakur D. P. Gurav A. S. Kim S. H. Di Pizio A. Niv M. Y. et al (2020). Functions of Opsins in Drosophila Taste. Curr. Biol.30, 1367–1379. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.068

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 494

  Lewis J. W. Hug S. J. Wallace-Williams S. E. Kliger D. S. (1990). Direct Evidence for an Equilibrium between Early Photolysis Intermediates of Rhodopsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc.112, 6711–6712. 10.1021/ja00174a040

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 495

  Lewis J. W. Van Kuijk F. J. G. M. Carruthers J. A. Kliger D. S. (1997). Metarhodopsin III Formation and Decay Kinetics: Comparison of Bovine and Human Rhodopsin. Vis. Res.37, 1–8. 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00138-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 496

  Li H. Huang C.-Y. Govorunova E. G. Schafer C. T. Sineshchekov O. A. Wang M. T. et al (2019). Crystal Structure of a Natural Light-Gated Anion Channelrhodopsin. eLife8, e41741. 10.7554/eLife.41741

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 497

  Li H. Huang C.-Y. Govorunova E. G. Sineshchekov O. A. Yi A. Rothschild K. J. et al (2021). The Crystal Structure of Bromide-Bound GtACR1 Reveals a Pre-activated State in the Transmembrane Anion Tunnel. Elife10, 65903. 10.7554/elife.65903

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 498

  Li J. Edwards P. C. Burghammer M. Villa C. Schertler G. F. X. (2004). Structure of Bovine Rhodopsin in a Trigonal Crystal Form. J. Mol. Biol.343, 1409–1438. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.090

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 499

  Li L. Z. Lu L. H. Ren Y. Tang G. Zhao Y. Cai X. et al (2022). Colocalized, Bidirectional Optogenetic Modulations in Freely Behaving Mice with a Wireless Dual-Color Optoelectronic Probe. Nat. Commun.13, 839. 10.1038/s41467-022-28539-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 500

  Liang J. Steinberg G. Livnah N. Sheves M. Ebrey T. G. Tsuda M. (1994). The pK_a of the Protonated Schiff Bases of Gecko Cone and octopus Visual Pigments. Biophys. J.67, 848–854. 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80544-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 501

  Lichty J. J. Malecki J. L. Agnew H. D. Michelson-Horowitz D. J. Tan S. (2005). Comparison of Affinity Tags for Protein Purification. Protein Expr. Purif.41, 98–105. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 502

  Liebel M. Schnedermann C. Bassolino G. Taylor G. Watts A. Kukura P. (2014). Direct Observation of the Coherent Nuclear Response after the Absorption of a Photon. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 238301. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.238301

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 503

  Liebert A. Pang V. Bicknell B. Mclachlan C. Mitrofanis J. Kiat H. (2021). A Perspective on the Potential of Opsins as an Integral Mechanism of Photobiomodulation: It's Not Just the Eyes. Photobiomodul Photomed. Laser Surg.40, 123–135. 10.1089/photob.2021.0106

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 504

  Lin J. Y. Knutsen P. M. Muller A. Kleinfeld D. Tsien R. Y. (2013). ReaChR: a Red-Shifted Variant of Channelrhodopsin Enables Deep Transcranial Optogenetic Excitation. Nat. Neurosci.16, 1499–1508. 10.1038/nn.3502

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 505

  Lin S. W. Kochendoerfer G. G. Carroll H. S. Wang D. Mathies R. A. Sakmar T. P. (1998). Mechanisms of Spectral Tuning in Blue Cone Visual Pigments - Visible and Raman Spectroscopy of Blue-Shifted Rhodopsin Mutants. J. Biol. Chem.273, 24583–24591. 10.1074/jbc.273.38.24583

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 506

  Lin S. W. Sakmar T. P. Franke R. R. Khorana H. G. Mathies R. A. (1992). Resonance Raman Microprobe Spectroscopy of Rhodopsin Mutants: Effect of Substitutions in the Third Transmembrane Helix. Biochemistry-USA31, 5105–5111. 10.1021/bi00137a003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 507

  Lincereghino J. Cregg J. M. (2000). Heterologous Protein Expression in the Methylotrophic Yeast Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.24, 45–66. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00532.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 508

  Lindner M. Gilhooley M. J. Peirson S. N. Hughes S. Hankins M. W. (2021). The Functional Characteristics of Optogenetic Gene Therapy for Vision Restoration. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.78, 1597–1613. 10.1007/s00018-020-03597-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 509

  Lips D. Schuurmans J. M. Branco Dos Santos F. Hellingwerf K. J. (2018). Many Ways towards 'solar Fuel': Quantitative Analysis of the Most Promising Strategies and the Main Challenges during Scale-Up. Energy & Environ. Sci.11, 10–22. 10.1039/c7ee02212c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 510

  Liu R. S. H. Asato A. E. (1990). “The Binding Site of Opsin Based on Analog Studies with Isomeric, Fluorinated, Alkylated, and Other Modified Retinals,” in Chemistry and Biology of Synthetic Retinoids. Editors DawsonM. I.OkamuraW. H. (Boca Raton, Fl, U.S.A.CRC Press), 52–75.

  • Google Scholar

• 511

  Liu R. S. H. Asato A. E. (2003). Tuning the Color and Excited State Properties of the Azulenic Chromophore: NIR Absorbing Pigments and Materials. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev.4, 179–194. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2003.09.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 512

  Liu R. S. H. Liu J. (2011). Fluorinated Retinoids and Carotenoids. J. Nat. Prod.74, 512–517. 10.1021/np1006394

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 513

  Liu R. S. H. Matsumoto H. Kini A. Asato A. E. Denny M. Kropf A. et al (1984). Seven New Hindered Isomeric Rhodopsins - A Reexamination of the Stereospecificity of the Binding-Site of Bovine Opsin. Tetrahedron40, 473–482. 10.1016/s0040-4020(01)88435-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 514

  Liu Y. Cui Y. M. Chi H. Xia Y. Liu H. N. Rossiter S. J. et al (2019). Scotopic Rod Vision in Tetrapods Arose from Multiple Early Adaptive Shifts in the Rate of Retinal Release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.116, 12627–12628. 10.1073/pnas.1900481116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 515

  Liu Y. Z. Zhang W. Du X. X. Liu Y. X. Qu J. B. Liu X. B. et al (2021). Genome‐wide Identification of Nonvisual Opsin Family Reveals Amplification of RPE‐retinal G Protein Receptor Gene (RGR) and Offers Novel Insights into Functions of RGR(s) in Paralichthys olivaceus (Paralichthyidae, Teleostei). J. Exp. Zoology Part B Mol. Dev. Evol.334, 25–36. 10.1002/jez.b.22914

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 516

  Locket N. A. (1977). “Adaptations to the Deep-Sea Environment,” in The Visual System in Vertebrates. Editor CrescitelliF. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 67–192.

  • Google Scholar

• 517

  López S. Rodriguez V. Montenegro J. Saá C. Alvarez R. López C. S. et al (2005). Synthesis of N-Heteroaryl Retinals and Their Artificial Bacteriorhodopsins. ChemBioChem6, 2078–2087. 10.1002/cbic.200500148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 518

  Lórenz-Fonfría V. A. Bamann C. Resler T. Schlesinger R. Bamberg E. Heberle J. (2015a). Temporal Evolution of Helix Hydration in a Light-Gated Ion Channel Correlates with Ion Conductance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.112, E5796–E5804. 10.1073/pnas.1511462112

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 519

  Lórenz-Fonfría V. A. Kandori H. (2009). Spectroscopic and Kinetic Evidence on How Bacteriorhodopsin Accomplishes Vectorial Proton Transport under Functional Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131, 5891–5901. 10.1021/ja900334c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 520

  Lórenz-Fonfría V. A. Schultz B.-J. Resler T. Schlesinger R. Bamann C. Bamberg E. et al (2015b). Pre-gating Conformational Changes in the ChETA Variant of Channelrhodopsin-2 Monitored by Nanosecond IR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 1850–1861. 10.1021/ja5108595

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 521

  Lórenz-Fonfría V. A. Yagi K. Ito S. Kandori H. (2021). Retinal Vibrations in Bacteriorhodopsin Are Mechanically Harmonic but Electrically Anharmonic: Evidence from Overtone and Combination Bands. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 749261. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.749261

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 522

  Lu Y. Zhou X. E. Gao X. Wang N. Xia R. X. Xu Z. M. et al (2020). Crystal Structure of Heliorhodopsin 48C12. Cell. Res.30, 88–90. 10.1038/s41422-019-0266-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 523

  Luck M. Velázquez Escobar F. Glass K. Sabotke M.-I. Hagedorn R. Corellou F. et al (2019). Photoreactions of the Histidine Kinase Rhodopsin Ot-HKR from the Marine Picoalga Ostreococcus Tauri. Biochemistry58, 1878–1891. 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 524

  Luecke H. Schobert B. Richter H.-T. Cartailler J.-P. Lanyi J. K. (1999). Structure of Bacteriorhodopsin at 1.55 Å Resolution. J. Mol. Biol.291, 899–911. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 525

  Luecke H. Schobert B. Stagno J. Imasheva E. S. Wang J. M. Balashov S. P. et al (2008). Crystallographic Structure of Xanthorhodopsin, the Light-Driven Proton Pump with a Dual Chromophore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 16561–16565. 10.1073/pnas.0807162105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 526

  Lugtenburg J. Creemers A. F. L. Verhoeven M. A. Van Wijk A. a. C. Verdegem P. J. E. Monnee M. C. F. et al (1999). Synthesis of ¹³C-Labeled Carotenoids and Retinoids. Pure Appl. Chem.71, 2245–2251. 10.1351/pac199971122245

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 527

  Lugtenburg J. Mathies R. A. Griffin R. G. Herzfeld J. (1988). Structure and Function of Rhodopsins from Solid State NMR and Resonance Raman Spectroscopy of Isotopic Retinal Derivatives. Trends biochem. Sci.13, 388–393. 10.1016/0968-0004(88)90181-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 528

  Luk H. L. Bhattacharyya N. Montisci F. Morrow J. M. Melaccio F. Wada A. et al (2016). Modulation of Thermal Noise and Spectral Sensitivity in Lake Baikal Cottoid Fish Rhodopsins. Sci. Rep.6, 38425. 10.1038/srep38425

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 529

  Lutnaes B. F. Kildahl-Andersen G. Krane J. Liaaen-Jensen S. (2004). Delocalized Carotenoid Cations in Relation to the Soliton Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc.126, 8981–8990. 10.1021/ja0492541

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 530

  Ma J.-X. Kono M. Xu L. Das J. Ryan J. C. Hazard E. S. Iii et al (2001). Salamander UV Cone Pigment: Sequence, Expression, and Spectral Properties. Vis. Neurosci.18, 393–399. 10.1017/s0952523801183057

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 531

  Maclaurin D. Venkatachalam V. Lee H. Cohen A. E. (2013). Mechanism of Voltage-Sensitive Fluorescence in a Microbial Rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110, 5939–5944. 10.1073/pnas.1215595110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 532

  Maeda A. Sasaki J. Pfefferle J. M. Shichida Y. Yoshizawa T. (1991). Fourier Transform Infrared Spectral Studies on the Schiff Base Mode of All-Trans Bacteriorhodopsin and its Photointermediates-K and Photointermediates-L. Photochem. Photobiol.54, 911–921. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb02111.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 533

  Maeda T. Imanishi Y. Palczewski K. (2003). Rhodopsin Phosphorylation: 30 Years Later. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.22, 417–434. 10.1016/s1350-9462(03)00017-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 534

  Mahn M. Saraf-Sinik I. Patil P. Pulin M. Bitton E. Karalis N. et al (2021). Efficient Optogenetic Silencing of Neurotransmitter Release with a Mosquito Rhodopsin. Neuron109, 1621–1635. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 535

  Malmerberg E. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Katona G. Deupi X. Arnlund D. Wickstrand C. et al (2015). Conformational Activation of Visual Rhodopsin in Native Disc Membranes. Sci. Signal.8, ra26. 10.1126/scisignal.2005646

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 536

  Maly T. Debelouchina G. T. Bajaj V. S. Hu K.-N. Joo C.-G. Mak-Jurkauskas M. L. et al (2008). Dynamic Nuclear Polarization at High Magnetic Fields. J. Chem. Phys.128, 052211. 10.1063/1.2833582

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 537

  Mao J. F. Aladin V. Jin X. S. Leeder A. J. Brown L. J. Brown R. C. D. et al (2019). Exploring Protein Structures by DNP-Enhanced Methyl Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 19888–19901. 10.1021/jacs.9b11195

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 538

  Mao J. F. Do N.-N. Scholz F. Reggie L. Mehler M. Lakatos A. et al (2014). Structural Basis of the Green-Blue Color Switching in Proteorhodopsin as Determined by NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 17578–17590. 10.1021/ja5097946

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 539

  Marrero H. Rothschild K. J. (1987). Conformational Changes in Bacteriorhodopsin Studied by Infrared Attenuated Total Reflection. Biophys. J.52, 629–635. 10.1016/s0006-3495(87)83254-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 540

  Marshel J. H. Kim Y. S. Machado T. A. Quirin S. Benson B. Kadmon J. et al (2019). Cortical Layer-specific Critical Dynamics Triggering Perception. Science365, eaaw5202. 10.1126/science.aaw5202

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 541

  Martinez A. Bradley A. S. Waldbauer J. R. Summons R. E. Delong E. F. (2007). Proteorhodopsin Photosystem Gene Expression Enables Photophosphorylation in a Heterologous Host. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.104, 5590–5595. 10.1073/pnas.0611470104

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 542

  Masuda S. Morita E. H. Tasumi M. Iwasa T. Tsuda M. (1993). Infrared Studies of octopus Rhodopsin - Existence of a Long- Lived Intermediate and the States of the Carboxylic Group of Asp- 81 in Rhodopsin and its Photoproducts. FEBS Lett.317, 223–227. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81280-d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 543

  Matarèse B. F. E. Feyen P. L. C. De Mello J. C. Benfenati F. (2019). Sub-millisecond Control of Neuronal Firing by Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.7, 278. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00278

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 544

  Mathies R. A. Lugtenburg J. (2000). “The Primary Photoreaction of Rhodopsin,” in Molecular Mechanisms in Visual Transduction. Editors StavengaD. G.DeGripW. J.PughJr.E. N. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Pub.), 55–90. 10.1016/s1383-8121(00)80005-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 545

  Mathies R. A. Smith S. O. Palings I. (1987). “Determination of Retinal Chromophore Structure in Rhodopsins,” in Resonance Raman Spectra of Polyenes and Aromatics. Editor SpiroT. G. (New York: John Wiley & Sons), 59–108.

  • Google Scholar

• 546

  Matsui S. Seidou M. Uchiyama I. Sekiya N. Hiraki K. Yoshihara K. et al (1988). 4-Hydroxyretinal, a New Visual Pigment Chromophore Found in the Bioluminescent Squid, Watasenia Scintillans. Biochimica Biophysica Acta966, 370–374. 10.1016/0304-4165(88)90087-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 547

  Mccamant D. W. Kukura P. Mathies R. A. (2005). Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Study of Excited-State Evolution in Bacteriorhodopsin. J. Phys. Chem. B109, 10449–10457. 10.1021/jp050095x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 548

  Mcdermott A. E. (2009). Structure and Dynamics of Membrane Proteins by Magic Angle Spinning Solid-State NMR. Annu. Rev. Biophysics38, 385–403. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.050708.133719

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 549

  Mcisaac R. S. Bedbrook C. N. Arnold F. H. (2015). Recent Advances in Engineering Microbial Rhodopsins for Optogenetics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.33, 8–15. 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.05.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 550

  Mcisaac R. S. Engqvist M. K. M. Wannier T. Rosenthal A. Z. Herwig L. Flytzanis N. C. et al (2014). Directed Evolution of a Far-Red Fluorescent Rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.111, 13034–13039. 10.1073/pnas.1413987111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 551

  Mckee A. G. Kuntz C. P. Ortega J. T. Woods H. Most V. Roushar F. J. et al (2021). Systematic Profiling of Temperature- and Retinal-Sensitive Rhodopsin Variants by Deep Mutational Scanning. J. Biol. Chem.2021, 101359. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101359

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 552

  Mederos S. Hernández-Vivanco A. Ramírez-Franco J. Martín-Fernández M. Navarrete M. Yang A. et al (2019). Melanopsin for Precise Optogenetic Activation of Astrocyte-Neuron Networks. Glia67, 915–934. 10.1002/glia.23580

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 553

  Mei G. X. Cavini C. M. Mamaeva N. Wang P. DeGrip W. J. Rothschild K. J. (2021). Optical Switching between Long-Lived States of Opsin Transmembrane Voltage Sensors. Photochem. Photobiol.97, 1001–1015. 10.1111/php.13428

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 554

  Mei G. X. Mamaeva N. Ganapathy S. Wang P. DeGrip W. J. Rothschild K. J. (2020). Analog Retinal Redshifts Visible Absorption of QuasAr Transmembrane Voltage Sensors into Near-Infrared. Photochem. Photobiol.96, 55–66. 10.1111/php.13169

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 555

  Mei G. X. Mamaeva N. Ganapathy S. Wang P. DeGrip W. J. Rothschild K. J. (2018). Raman Spectroscopy of a Near Infrared Absorbing Proteorhodopsin: Similarities to the Bacteriorhodopsin O Photointermediate. Plos One13, e0209506. 10.1371/journal.pone.0209506

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 556

  Melaccio F. Del Carmen Marín M. Valentini A. Montisci F. Rinaldi S. Cherubini M. et al (2016). Toward Automatic Rhodopsin Modeling as a Tool for High-Throughput Computational Photobiology. J. Chem. Theory Comput.12, 6020–6034. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00367

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 557

  Melyan Z. Tarttelin E. E. Bellingham J. Lucas R. J. Hankins M. W. (2005). Addition of Human Melanopsin Renders Mammalian Cells Photoresponsive. Nature433, 741–745. 10.1038/nature03344

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 558

  Milosevic M. M. Jang J. Mckimm E. J. Zhu M. H. Antic S. D. (2020). In Vitro Testing of Voltage Indicators: Archon1, ArcLightD, ASAP1, ASAP2s, ASAP3b, Bongwoori-Pos6, BeRST1, FlicR1, and Chi-VSFP-Butterfly. eNeuro7, 0060. 10.1523/eneuro.0060-20.2020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 559

  Mishra A. K. Gragg M. Stoneman M. R. Biener G. Oliver J. A. Miszta P. et al (2016). Quaternary Structures of Opsin in Live Cells Revealed by FRET Spectrometry. Biochem. J.473, 3819–3836. 10.1042/bcj20160422

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 560

  Misra R. Eliash T. Sudo Y. Sheves M. (2019). Retinal-Salinixanthin Interactions in a Thermophilic Rhodopsin. J. Phys. Chem. B123, 10–20. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06795

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 561

  Mitra A. K. Miercke L. J. W. Turner G. J. Shand R. F. Betlach M. C. Stroud R. M. (1993). Two-dimensional Crystallization of Escherichia Coli-Expressed Bacteriorhodopsin and its D96N Variant: High Resolution Structural Studies in Projection. Biophys. J.65, 1295–1306. 10.1016/s0006-3495(93)81169-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 562

  Mitsuoka K. Hirai T. Murata K. Miyazawa A. Kidera A. Kimura Y. et al (1999). The Structure of Bacteriorhodopsin at 3.0 Å Resolution Based on Electron Crystallography: Implication of the Charge Distribution. J. Mol. Biol.286, 861–882. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2529

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 563

  Miyasaka T. Koyama K. Itoh I. (1992). Quantum Conversion and Image Detection by a Bacteriorhodopsin- Based Artificial Photoreceptor. Science255, 342–344. 10.1126/science.255.5042.342

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 564

  Molday R. S. (1989). Monoclonal Antibodies to Rhodopsin and Other Proteins of Rod Outer Segments. Prog. Retin. Res.8, 173–209.

  • Google Scholar

• 565

  Mollaaghababa R. Davidson F. F. Kaiser C. Khorana H. G. (1996). Structure and Function in Rhodopsin: Expression of Functional Mammalian Opsin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.93, 11482–11486. 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11482

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 566

  Mollevanger L. C. P. J. Kentgens A. P. M. Pardoen J. A. Courtin J. M. L. Veeman W. S. Lugtenburg J. et al (1987). High-resolution Solid-State ¹³C-NMR Study of Carbons C-5 and C-12 of the Chromophore of Bovine Rhodopsin: Evidence for a 6-S-Cis Conformation with Negative-Charge Perturbation Near C-12. Eur. J. Biochem.163, 9–14. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb10729.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 567

  Mooney V. L. Szundi I. Lewis J. W. Yan E. C. Y. Kliger D. S. (2012). Schiff Base Protonation Changes in Siberian Hamster Ultraviolet Cone Pigment Photointermediates. Biochemistry51, 2630–2637. 10.1021/bi300157r

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 568

  Moraes M. N. Monteiro De Assis L. V. Provencio I. De Lauro Castrucci A. M. (2021). Opsins outside the Eye and the Skin: a More Complex Scenario Than Originally Thought for a Classical Light Sensor. Cell. Tissue Res.385, 519–538. 10.1007/s00441-021-03500-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 569

  Morello J.-P. Bouvier M. (1996). Palmitoylation: A Post-translational Modification that Regulates Signalling from G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Biochem. Cell. Biol.74, 449–457. 10.1139/o96-049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 570

  Mori A. Yagasaki J. Homma M. Reissig L. Sudo Y. (2013). Investigation of the Chromophore Binding Cavity in the 11-cis Acceptable Microbial Rhodopsin MR. Chem. Phys.419, 23–29. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2012.11.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 571

  Morizumi T. Ou W.-L. Van Eps N. Inoue K. Kandori H. Brown L. S. et al (2019). X-ray Crystallographic Structure and Oligomerization of Gloeobacter Rhodopsin. Sci. Rep.9, 11283–1128111215. 10.1038/s41598-019-47445-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 572

  Morton R. A. Goodwin T. W. (1944). Preparation of Retinene In Vitro. Nature153, 405–406. 10.1038/153405a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 573

  Morton R. A. Pitt G. A. J. (1957). Visual Pigments. Fortschritte Chem. Org. Naturst.14, 244–316. 10.1007/978-3-7091-7164-6_6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 574

  Mous S. Gotthard G. Ehrenberg D. Sen S. Weinert T. Johnson P. J. M. et al (2022). Dynamics and Mechanism of a Light-Driven Chloride Pump. Science375, 845. 10.1126/science.abj6663

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 575

  Moutsaki P. Whitmore D. H. Bellingham J. Sakamoto K. David-Gray Z. K. Foster R. G. (2003). Teleost Multiple Tissue (Tmt) Opsin: A Candidate Photopigment Regulating the Peripheral Clocks of Zebrafish?Mol. Brain Res.112, 135–145. 10.1016/s0169-328x(03)00059-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 576

  Mroginski M.-A. Adam S. Amoyal G. S. Barnoy A. Bondar A.-N. Borin V. A. et al (2021). Frontiers in Multiscale Modeling of Photoreceptor Proteins. Photochem. Photobiol.97, 243–269. 10.1111/php.13372

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 577

  Mukherjee S. Hegemann P. Broser M. (2019). Enzymerhodopsins: Novel Photoregulated Catalysts for Optogenetics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.57, 118–126. 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.02.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 578

  Müller D. J. Kessler M. Oesterhelt F. Möller C. Oesterhelt D. Gaub H. (2002). Stability of Bacteriorhodopsin α-helices and Loops Analyzed by Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy. Biophysical J.83, 3578–3588. 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75358-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 579

  Müller H. (1855). Über die entoptische Wahrnemung der Netzhautgefässe, insbesondere als Beweismittel für die Lichtperception durch die nach hinten gelegene Netzhautelemente. Verhandlungen. Physikalisch-Medizinische Gesellschaft Würzburg5, 411–447.

  • Google Scholar

• 580

  Müller M. (1992). Proteolysis in Protein Import and Export: Signal Peptide Processing in Eu- and Prokaryotes. Experientia48, 118–129.

  • Google Scholar

• 581

  Munro R. A. De Vlugt J. Ward M. E. Kim S. Y. Lee K. A. Jung K.-H. et al (2019). Biosynthetic Production of Fully Carbon-13 Labeled Retinal in E. coli for Structural and Functional Studies of Rhodopsins. J. Biomol. NMR73, 49–58. 10.1007/s10858-019-00225-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 582

  Muradin-Szweykowska M. Peters A. J. M. Lugtenburg J. (1984). The Interaction of Bacterioopsin with 11, 14-bridged Retinals - the Synthesis of 13-demethyl-11, 14-Imino-Retinal, 13-Demethyl-N-Methyl-11, 14-imino, 13-demethyl-11, 14-Thio-Retinal, 13-demethyl-11, 14-Etheno-Retinal, 11, 14-Imino-Retinal and Their Binding with Bacterioopsin. Recl. Des. Trav. Chim. Des. Pays-Bas103, 105–109.

  • Google Scholar

• 583

  Murakami M. Kouyama T. (2008). Crystal Structure of Squid Rhodopsin. Nature453, 363–U333. 10.1038/nature06925

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 584

  Murakami M. Kouyama T. (2011). Crystallographic Analysis of the Primary Photochemical Reaction of Squid Rhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol.413, 615–627. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.08.044

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 585

  Murakami M. Kouyama T. (2015). Crystallographic Study of the LUMI Intermediate of Squid Rhodopsin. PLoS ONE10, e0126970. 10.1371/journal.pone.0126970

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 586

  Musilova Z. Cortesi F. Matschiner M. Davies W. I. L. Patel J. S. Stieb S. M. et al (2019). Vision Using Multiple Distinct Rod Opsins in Deep-Sea Fishes. Science364, 588–592. 10.1126/science.aav4632

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 587

  Musio C. Santillo S. Taddei-Ferretti C. Robles L. J. Vismara R. Barsanti L. et al (2001). First Identification and Localization of a Visual Pigment in Hydra (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). J. Comp. Physiology A - Sens. Neural Behav. Physiology187, 79–81. 10.1007/s003590100180

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 588

  Mustafi D. Engel A. H. Palczewski K. (2009). Structure of Cone Photoreceptors. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.28, 289–302. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.05.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 589

  Na Y.-A. Lee J.-Y. Bang W.-J. Lee H. J. Choi S.-I. Kwon S.-K. et al (2015). Growth Retardation of Escherichia coli by Artificial Increase of Intracellular ATP. J. Industrial Microbiol. Biotechnol.42, 915–924. 10.1007/s10295-015-1609-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 590

  Nagata T. Inoue K. (2022). Rhodopsins at a Glance. J. Cell. Sci.134, jcs258989. 10.1242/jcs.258989

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 591

  Nagata T. Koyanagi M. Lucas R. Terakita A. (2018). An All-Trans-Retinal-Binding Opsin Peropsin as a Potential Dark-Active and Light-Inactivated G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Sci. Rep.8, 3535. 10.1038/s41598-018-21946-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 592

  Nagata T. Koyanagi M. Tsukamoto H. Mutt E. Schertler G. F. X. Deupi X. et al (2019). The Counterion-Retinylidene Schiff Base Interaction of an Invertebrate Rhodopsin Rearranges upon Light Activation. Commun. Biol.2, 180–181189. 10.1038/s42003-019-0409-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 593

  Nagel G. Szellas T. Huhn W. Kateriya S. Adeishvili N. Berthold P. et al (2003). Channelrhodopsin-2, a Directly Light-Gated Cation-Selective Membrane Channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.100, 13940–13945. 10.1073/pnas.1936192100

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 594

  Naito A. Makino Y. Shigeta A. Kawamura I. (2019). Photoreaction Pathways and Photointermediates of Retinal-Binding Photoreceptor Proteins as Revealed by In Situ Photoirradiation Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Biophys. Rev.11, 167–181. 10.1007/s12551-019-00501-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 595

  Nakagawa M. Iwasa T. Kikkawa S. Takao T. Shimonishi Y. Tsuda M. (1997). Identification of Two Palmitoyl Groups in octopus Rhodopsin. Photochem. Photobiol.65, 185–189. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb01897.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 596

  Nakagawa M. Iwasa T. Kikkawa S. Tsuda M. Ebrey T. G. (1999). How Vertebrate and Invertebrate Visual Pigments Differ in Their Mechanism of Photoactivation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.96, 6189–6192. 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6189

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 597

  Nakajima Y. Pedraza-González L. Barneschi L. Inoue K. Olivucci M. Kandori H. (2021). Pro219 Is an Electrostatic Color Determinant in the Light-Driven Sodium Pump KR2. Commun. Biol.4, 1185. 10.1038/s42003-021-02684-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 598

  Nakajima Y. Tsukamoto T. Kumagai Y. Ogura Y. Hayashi T. Song J. et al (2018). Presence of a Haloarchaeal Halorhodopsin-like Cl- Pump in Marine Bacteria. Microbes Environ.33, 89–97. 10.1264/jsme2.me17197

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 599

  Nakamichi H. Okada T. (2006). Crystallographic Analysis of Primary Visual Photochemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.45, 4270–4273. 10.1002/anie.200600595

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 600

  Nakamura A. Kojima D. Imai H. Terakita A. Okano T. Shichida Y. et al (1999). Chimeric Nature of Pinopsin between Rod and Cone Visual Pigments. Biochemistry-USA38, 14738–14745. 10.1021/bi9913496

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 601

  Nakao S. Kojima K. Sudo Y. (2021). Microbial Rhodopsins as Multi-Functional Photoreactive Membrane Proteins for Optogenetics. Biol. Pharm. Bull.44, 1357–1363. 10.1248/bpb.b21-00544

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 602

  Nakao S. Kojima K. Sudo Y. (2022). Phototriggered Apoptotic Cell Death (PTA) Using the Light-Driven Outward Proton Pump Rhodopsin Archaerhodopsin-3. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 3771. 10.1021/jacs.1c12608

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 603

  Nakatsuma A. Yamashita T. Sasaki K. Kawanabe A. Inoue K. Furutani Y. et al (2011). Chimeric Microbial Rhodopsins Containing the Third Cytoplasmic Loop of Bovine Rhodopsin. Biophysical J.100, 1874–1882. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.02.054

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 604

  Nakayama T. A. Khorana H. G. (1991). Mapping of the Amino Acids in Membrane-Embedded Helices that Interact with the Retinal Chromophore in Bovine Rhodopsin. J. Biol. Chem.266, 4269–4275. 10.1016/s0021-9258(20)64317-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 605

  Nango E. Royant A. Kubo M. Nakane T. Wickstrand C. Kimura T. et al (2016). A Three-Dimensional Movie of Structural Changes in Bacteriorhodopsin. Science354, 1552–1557. 10.1126/science.aah3497

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 606

  Nathans J. (1987). Molecular Biology of Visual Pigments. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.10, 163–194. 10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.001115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 607

  Nathans J. (1992). Rhodopsin - Structure, Function, and Genetics. Biochemistry31, 4923–4931. 10.1021/bi00136a001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 608

  Neitz M. Neitz J. (1998). “Molecular Genetics and the Biological Basis of Color Vision,” in Color Vision - Perspectives from Different Disciplines. Editors BackhausW.KlieglR. (Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co.), 101–119.

  • Google Scholar

• 609

  Neumann K. Verhoefen M.-K. Weber I. Glaubitz C. Wachtveitl J. (2008). Initial Reaction Dynamics of Proteorhodopsin Observed by Femtosecond Infrared and Visible Spectroscopy. Biophysical J.94, 4796–4807. 10.1529/biophysj.107.125484

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 610

  Neutze R. Brändén G. Schertler G. F. X. (2015). Membrane Protein Structural Biology Using X-Ray Free Electron Lasers. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.33, 115–125. 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.08.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 611

  Nguyen K.-A. Peuchmaur M. Magnard S. Haudecoeur R. Boyère C. Mounien S. et al (2018). Glycosyl-Substituted Dicarboxylates as Detergents for the Extraction, Overstabilization, and Crystallization of Membrane Proteins. Angew. Chemie-International Ed.57, 2948–2952. 10.1002/anie.201713395

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 612

  Nielsen M. B. (2009). Model Systems for Understanding Absorption Tuning by Opsin Proteins. Chem. Soc. Rev.38, 913–924. 10.1039/b802068j

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 613

  Nikolaev D. M. Manathunga M. Orozco-Gonzalez Y. Shtyrov A. A. Omar Guerrero Martínez Y. Gozem S. et al (2021). Free Energy Computation for an Isomerizing Chromophore in a Molecular Cavity via the Average Solvent Electrostatic Configuration Model: Applications in Rhodopsin and Rhodopsin-Mimicking Systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput.17, 5885–5895. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00221

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 614

  Nikolaev D. M. Shtyrov A. A. Mereshchenko A. S. Panov M. S. Tveryanovich Y. S. Ryazantsev M. N. (2020). An Assessment of Water Placement Algorithms in Quantum Mechanics/molecular Mechanics Modeling: the Case of Rhodopsins' First Spectral Absorption Band Maxima. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 18114–18123. 10.1039/d0cp02638g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 615

  Nikolaev D. M. Shtyrov A. A. Panov M. S. Jamal A. Chakchir O. B. Kochemirovsky V. A. et al (2018). A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction. ACS Omega3, 7555–7566. 10.1021/acsomega.8b00721

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 616

  Nogly P. Weinert T. James D. Carbajo S. Ozerov D. Furrer A. et al (2018). Retinal Isomerization in Bacteriorhodopsin Captured by a Femtosecond X-Ray Laser. Science361, 145–151. 10.1126/science.aat0094

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 617

  Nomura Y. Ito S. Teranishi M. Ono H. Inoue K. Kandori H. (2018). Low-temperature FTIR Spectroscopy Provides Evidence for Protein-Bound Water Molecules in Eubacterial Light-Driven Ion Pumpsl. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20, 3165–3171. 10.1039/c7cp05674e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 618

  Nonaka Y. Hanai S. Katayama K. Imai H. Kandori H. (2020). Unique Retinal Binding Pocket of Primate Blue-Sensitive Visual Pigment. Biochemistry59, 2602–2607. 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00394

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 619

  O'tousa J. E. (1992). Requirement of N-Linked Glycosylation Site in Drosophila Rhodopsin. Vis. Neurosci.8, 385–390. 10.1017/s0952523800004910

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 620

  Oda K. Nomura T. Nakane T. Yamashita K. Inoue K. Ito S. et al (2021). Time-resolved Serial Femtosecond Crystallography Reveals Early Structural Changes in Channelrhodopsin. eLife10, 62389. 10.7554/eLife.62389

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 621

  Oda K. Vierock J. Oishi S. Rodriguez-Rozada S. Taniguchi R. Yamashita K. et al (2018). Crystal Structure of the Red Light-Activated Channelrhodopsin Chrimson. Nat. Commun.9, 3949. 10.1038/s41467-018-06421-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 622

  Oesterhelt D. Bräuchle C. Hampp N. (1991). Bacteriorhodopsin - A Biological Material for Information Processing. Quart. Rev. Biophys.24, 425–478. 10.1017/s0033583500003863

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 623

  Oesterhelt D. Hess B. (1973). Reversible Photolysis of Purple Complex in Purple Membrane of Halobacterium Halobium. Eur. J. Biochem.37, 316–326. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb02990.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 624

  Oesterhelt D. Stoeckenius W. (1971). Rhodopsin-like Protein from the Purple Membrane of Halobacterium Halobium. Nat. New Biol.233, 149–152. 10.1038/newbio233149a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 625

  Oesterhelt D. (1998). The Structure and Mechanism of the Family of Retinal Proteins from Halophilic Archaea. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.8, 489–500. 10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80128-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 626

  Ogonah O. Shuler M. L. Granados R. R. (1991). Protein Production (β-Galactosidase) from a Baculovirus Vector in Spodoptera Frugiperda and Trichpolusia Ni Cells in Suspension Culture. Biotechnol. Lett.13, 265–270. 10.1007/bf01041482

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 627

  Ogren J. I. Yi A. Mamaev S. Li H. Lugtenburg J. DeGrip W. J. et al (2015). Comparison of the Structural Changes Occurring during the Primary Phototransition of Two Different Channelrhodopsins from Chlamydomonas Algae. Biochemistry54, 377–388. 10.1021/bi501243y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 628

  Okada T. Sugihara M. Bondar A.-N. Elstner M. Entel P. Buss V. (2004). The Retinal Conformation and its Environment in Rhodopsin in Light of a New 2.2 Å Crystal Structure. J. Mol. Biol.342, 571–583. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.044

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 629

  Okano T. Fukada Y. Artamonov I. D. Yoshizawa T. (1989). Purification of Cone Visual Pigments from Chicken Retina. Biochemistry-USA28, 8848–8856. 10.1021/bi00448a025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 630

  Okano T. Yoshizawa T. Fukada Y. (1994). Pinopsin Is a Chicken Pineal Photoreceptive Molecule. Nature372, 94–97. 10.1038/372094a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 631

  Okitsu T. Yamano Y. Shen Y. C. Sasaki T. Kobayashi Y. Morisawa S. et al (2020). Synthesis of One Double Bond-Inserted Retinal Analogs and Their Binding Experiments with Opsins: Preparation of Novel Red-Shifted Channelrhodopsin Variants. Chem. Pharm. Bull.68, 265–272. 10.1248/cpb.c19-01005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 632

  Olinski L. E. Lin E. M. Oancea E. (2020). Illuminating Insights into Opsin 3 Function in the Skin. Adv. Biol. Regul.75, 100668. 10.1016/j.jbior.2019.100668

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 633

  Oppermann J. Fischer P. Silapetere A. Liepe B. Rodriguez-Rozada S. Flores-Uribe J. et al (2019). MerMAIDs: a Family of Metagenomically Discovered Marine Anion-Conducting and Intensely Desensitizing Channelrhodopsins. Nat. Commun.10, 3315. 10.1038/s41467-019-11322-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 634

  Oprian D. D. Asenjo A. B. Lee N. Pelletier S. L. (1991). Design, Chemical Synthesis, and Expression of Genes for the Three Human Color Vision Pigments. Biochemistry30, 11367–11372. 10.1021/bi00112a002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 635

  Oprian D. D. Molday R. S. Kaufman R. J. Khorana H. G. (1987). Expression of a Synthetic Bovine Rhodopsin Gene in Monkey Kidney Cells. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.84, 8874–8878. 10.1073/pnas.84.24.8874

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 636

  Ortega J. T. Jastrzebska B. (2019). The Retinoid and Non-retinoid Ligands of the Rod Visual G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 6218. 10.3390/ijms20246218

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 637

  Ovchinnikov Y. A. Abdulaev N. G. Bogachuk A. S. (1988a). Two Adjacent Cysteine Residues in the C-Terminal Cytoplasmic Fragment of Bovine Rhodopsin Are Palmitylated. FEBS Lett.230, 1–5. 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80628-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 638

  Ovchinnikov Y. A. Abdulaev N. G. Zolotarev A. S. Artamonov I. D. Bespalov I. A. Dergachev A. E. et al (1988b). Octopus Rhodopsin - Amino Acid Sequence Deduced from C-DNA. FEBS Lett.232, 69–72. 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80388-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 639

  Owen S. F. Liu M. H. Kreitzer A. C. (2019). Thermal Constraints on In Vivo Optogenetic Manipulations. Nat. Neurosci.22, 1061–1065. 10.1038/s41593-019-0422-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 640

  Ozaki Y. Kawashima T. Abe-Yoshizumi R. Kandori H. (2014). A Color-Determining Amino Acid Residue of Proteorhodopsin. Biochemistry53, 6032–6040. 10.1021/bi500842w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 641

  Palczewski K. (2012). Chemistry and Biology of Vision. J. Biol. Chem.287, 1612–1619. 10.1074/jbc.r111.301150

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 642

  Palczewski K. (2006). G Protein-Coupled Receptor Rhodopsin. Annu. Rev. Biochem.75, 743–767. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142743

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 643

  Palczewski K. Kumasaka T. Hori T. Behnke C. A. Motoshima H. Fox B. A. et al (2000). Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Science289, 739–745. 10.1126/science.289.5480.739

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 644

  Palczewski K. Orban T. (2013). From Atomic Structures to Neuronal Functions of G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.36, 139–164. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170313

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 645

  Palings I. Pardoen J. A. Vandenberg E. M. M. Winkel C. Lugtenburg J. Mathies R. A. (1987). Assignment of Fingerprint Vibrations in the Resonance Raman Spectra of Rhodopsin, Isorhodopsin, and Bathorhodopsin: Implications for Chromophore Structure and Environment. Biochemistry-USA26, 2544–2556. 10.1021/bi00383a021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 646

  Panda S. Nayak S. K. Campo B. Walker J. R. Hogenesch J. B. Jegla T. (2005). Illumination of the Melanopsin Signaling Pathway. Science307, 600–604. 10.1126/science.1105121

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 647

  Panda S. Sato T. K. De Lauro Castrucci A. M. DeGrip W. J. Rollag M. D. Hogenesch J. B. et al (2002). Melanopsin (Opn4) Is Required for Circadian Phase Shifting under Low Light Conditions. Science298, 2213–2216. 10.1126/science.1076848

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 648

  Pande C. Pande A. Yue K. T. Callender R. H. Ebrey T. G. Tsuda M. (1987). Resonance Raman Spectroscopy of octopus Rhodopsin and its Photoproducts. Biochemistry26, 4941–4947. 10.1021/bi00390a009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 649

  Panneels V. Wu W. T. Tsai C.-J. Nogly P. Rheinberger J. Jaeger K. et al (2015). Time-resolved Structural Studies with Serial Crystallography: A New Light on Retinal Proteins. Struct. Dyn.2, 041718. 10.1063/1.4922774

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 650

  Panzer S. Zhang C. Konte T. Bräuer C. Diemar A. Yogendran P. et al (2021). Modified Rhodopsins from Aureobasidium Pullulans Excel with Very High Proton-Transport Rates. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 750528. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.750528

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 651

  Park J. H. Morizumi T. Li Y. F. Hong J. E. Pai E. F. Hofmann K. P. et al (2013). Opsin, a Structural Model for Olfactory Receptors?Angew. Chemie-International Ed.52, 11021–11024. 10.1002/anie.201302374

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 652

  Park J. H. Scheerer P. Hofmann K. P. Choe H.-W. Ernst O. P. (2008). Crystal Structure of the Ligand-free G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Opsin. Nature454, 183–187. 10.1038/nature07063

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 653

  Park P. S.-H. Sapra K. T. Jastrzebska B. Maeda T. Maeda A. Pulawski W. et al (2009). Modulation of Molecular Interactions and Function by Rhodopsin Palmitylation. Biochemistry48, 4294–4304. 10.1021/bi900417b

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 654

  Passamaneck Y. J. Furchheim N. Hejnol A. Martindale M. Q. Lüter C. (2011). Ciliary Photoreceptors in the Cerebral Eyes of a Protostome Larva. EvoDevo2, 6. 10.1186/2041-9139-2-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 655

  Patel J. S. Brown C. J. Ytreberg F. M. Stenkamp D. L. (2018). Predicting Peak Spectral Sensitivities of Vertebrate Cone Visual Pigments Using Atomistic Molecular Simulations. Plos Comput. Biol.14, e1005974. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005974

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 656

  Patriarchi T. Shen A. He W. Baikoghli M. Cheng R. H. Xiang Y. K. et al (2018). Nanodelivery of a Functional Membrane Receptor to Manipulate Cellular Phenotype. Sci. Rep.8, 3556. 10.1038/s41598-018-21863-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 657

  Pebay-Peyroula E. Neutze R. Landau E. M. (2000). Lipidic Cubic Phase Crystallization of Bacteriorhodopsin and Cryotrapping of Intermediates: Towards Resolving a Revolving Photocycle. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1460, 119–132. 10.1016/s0005-2728(00)00134-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 658

  Pediani J. D. Ward R. J. Marsango S. Milligan G. (2018). Spatial Intensity Distribution Analysis: Studies of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Oligomerisation. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.39, 175–186. 10.1016/j.tips.2017.09.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 659

  Pedraza-González L. Barneschi L. Padula D. De Vico L. Olivucci M. (2022). Evolution of the Automatic Rhodopsin Modeling (ARM) Protocol. Top. Curr. Chem.380 (21), 21–48. 10.1007/s41061-022-00374-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 660

  Pedraza-González L. Del Carmen Marín M. Jorge A. N. Ruck T. D. Yang X. C. Valentini A. et al (2020). Web-ARM: A Web-Based Interface for the Automatic Construction of QM/MM Models of Rhodopsins. J. Chem. Inf. Model.60, 1481–1493.

  • Google Scholar

• 661

  Peirson S. N. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Lupi D. Jeffery G. DeGrip W. J. Foster R. G. (2004). Expression of the Candidate Circadian Photopigment Melanopsin (Opn4) in the Mouse Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Mol. Brain Res.123, 132–135. 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.01.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 662

  Penzkofer A. Silapetere A. Hegemann P. (2021). Photocycle Dynamics of the Archaerhodopsin 3 Based Fluorescent Voltage Sensor Archon2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B-Biology225, 112331. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112331

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 663

  Pepe I. M. Cugnoli C. (1992). Retinal Photoisomerase - Role in Invertebrate Visual Cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B-Biol13, 5–17. 10.1016/1011-1344(92)80035-t

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 664

  Pérez A. A. Chen Q. Pineda Hernández H. Branco Dos Santos F. Hellingwerf K. J. (2019a). On the Use of Oxygenic Photosynthesis for the Sustainable Production of Commodity Chemicals. Physiol. Plant.166, 413–427. 10.1111/ppl.12946

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 665

  Pérez J. H. Tolla E. Dunn I. C. Meddle S. L. Stevenson T. J. (2019b). A Comparative Perspective on Extra-retinal Photoreception. Trends Endocrinol. Metabolism30, 39–53. 10.1016/j.tem.2018.10.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 666

  Pérez-Cerezales S. Boryshpolets S. Afanzar O. Brandis A. Nevo R. Kiss V. et al (2015). Involvement of Opsins in Mammalian Sperm Thermotaxis. Sci. Rep.5, 16146. 10.1038/srep16146

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 667

  Perrino A. P. Miyagi A. Scheuring S. (2021). Single Molecule Kinetics of Bacteriorhodopsin by HS-AFM. Nat. Commun.12, 7225. 10.1038/s41467-021-27580-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 668

  Peters L. D. M. Kussmann J. Ochsenfeld C. (2020). Combining Graphics Processing Units, Simplified Time-dependent Density Functional Theory, and Finite-Difference Couplings to Accelerate Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 3955–3961. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00320

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 669

  Philosof A. Béjà O. (2013). Bacterial, Archaeal and Viral-like Rhodopsins from the Red Sea. Environ. Microbiol. Rep.5, 475–482. 10.1111/1758-2229.12037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 670

  Piatkevich K. D. Bensussen S. Tseng H.-A. Shroff S. N. Lopez-Huerta V. G. Park D. et al (2019). Population Imaging of Neural Activity in Awake Behaving Mice. Nature574, 413–417. 10.1038/s41586-019-1641-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 671

  Piatkevich K. D. Jung E. E. Straub C. Linghu C. G. Park D. Suk H.-J. et al (2018). A Robotic Multidimensional Directed Evolution Approach Applied to Fluorescent Voltage Reporters. Nat. Chem. Biol.14, 352–360. 10.1038/s41589-018-0004-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 672

  Piechnick R. Ritter E. Hildebrand P. W. Ernst O. P. Scheerer P. Hofmann K.-P. et al (2012). Effect of Channel Mutations on the Uptake and Release of the Retinal Ligand in Opsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.109, 5247–5252. 10.1073/pnas.1117268109

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 673

  Pieri E. Ledentu V. Sahlin M. Dehez F. Olivucci M. Ferré N. (2019). CpHMD-Then-QM/MM Identification of the Amino Acids Responsible for the Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin pH-dependent Electronic Absorption Spectrum. J. Chem. Theory Comput.15, 4535–4546. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00221

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 674

  Pinhassi J. Delong E. F. Béjà O. González J. M. Pedrós-Alió C. (2016). Marine Bacterial and Archaeal Ion-Pumping Rhodopsins: Genetic Diversity, Physiology, and Ecology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.80, 929–953. 10.1128/mmbr.00003-16

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 675

  Plachetzki D. C. Fong C. R. Oakley T. H. (2012). Cnidocyte Discharge Is Regulated by Light and Opsin-Mediated Phototransduction. BMC Biol.10, 17. 10.1186/1741-7007-10-17

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 676

  Planchard N. Point E. Dahmane T. Giusti F. Renault M. Le Bon C. et al (2014). The Use of Amphipols for Solution NMR Studies of Membrane Proteins: Advantages and Constraints as Compared to Other Solubilizing Media. J. Membr. Biol.247, 827–842. 10.1007/s00232-014-9654-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 677

  Poddar H. Heyes D. J. Schiro G. Weik M. Leys D. Scrutton N. S. (2022). A Guide to Time-Resolved Structural Analysis of Light-Activated Proteins. FEBS J.289, 576–595. 10.1111/febs.15880

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 678

  Polito R. Temperini M. E. Ritter E. Puskar L. Schade U. Broser M. et al (2021). Conformational Changes of a Membrane Protein Determined by Infrared Difference Spectroscopy beyond the Diffraction Limit. Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 014048. 10.1103/physrevapplied.16.014048

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 679

  Polli D. Rivalta I. Nenov A. Weingart O. Garavelli M. Cerullo G. (2015). Tracking the Primary Photoconversion Events in Rhodopsins by Ultrafast Optical Spectroscopy. Photochem. Photobiological Sci.14, 213–228. 10.1039/c4pp00370e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 680

  Pope A. L. Sanchez-Reyes O. B. South K. Zaitseva E. Ziliox M. Vogel R. et al (2020). A Conserved Proline Hinge Mediates Helix Dynamics and Activation of Rhodopsin. Structure28, 1004–1013. 10.1016/j.str.2020.05.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 681

  Popot J.-L. Althoff T. Bagnard D. Banères J.-L. Bazzacco P. Billon-Denis E. et al (2011). Amphipols from A to Z. Annu. Rev. Biophysics40, 379–408. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155219

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 682

  Popp A. Wolperdinger M. Hampp N. Bräuchle C. Oesterhelt D. (1993). Photochemical Conversion of the O-Intermediate to 9-Cis-Retinal- Containing Products in Bacteriorhodopsin Films. Biophys. J.65, 1449–1459. 10.1016/s0006-3495(93)81214-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 683

  Porter M. L. Blasic J. R. Jr. Bok M. J. Cameron E. G. Pringle T. Cronin T. W. et al (2012). Shedding New Light on Opsin Evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biological Sci.279, 3–14. 10.1098/rspb.2011.1819

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 684

  Prakash M. Murphy J. St Laurent R. Friedman N. Crespo E. L. Bjorefeldt A. et al (2022). Selective Control of Synaptically-Connected Circuit Elements by All-Optical Synapses. Commun. Biol.5, 33. 10.1038/s42003-021-02981-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 685

  Provencio I. Jiang G. DeGrip W. J. Hayes W. P. Rollag M. D. (1998). Melanopsin: An Opsin in Melanophores, Brain and Eye. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.95, 340–345. 10.1073/pnas.95.1.340

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 686

  Provencio I. Rodriguez I. R. Jiang G. Hayes W. P. Moreira E. F. Rollag M. D. (2000). A Novel Human Opsin in the Inner Retina. J. Neurosci.20, 600–605. 10.1523/jneurosci.20-02-00600.2000

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 687

  Pushkarev A. Inoue K. Larom S. Flores-Uribe J. Singh M. Konno M. et al (2018). A Distinct Abundant Group of Microbial Rhodopsins Discovered Using Functional Metagenomics. Nature558, 595–599. 10.1038/s41586-018-0225-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 688

  Qiu X. D. Kumbalasiri T. Carlson S. M. Wong K. Y. Krishna V. R. Provencio I. et al (2005). Induction of Photosensitivity by Heterologous Expression of Melanopsin. Nature433, 745–749. 10.1038/nature03345

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 689

  Radlwimmer F. B. Yokoyama S. (1997). Cloning and Expression of the Red Visual Pigment Gene of Goat (Capra hircus). Gene198, 211–215. 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00316-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 690

  Ranganathan R. Stevens C. F. (1995). Arrestin Binding Determines the Rate of Inactivation of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Rhodopsin In Vivo. Cell.81, 841–848. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90004-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 691

  Rath P. Decaluwé G. L. J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. DeGrip W. J. Rothschild K. J. (1993). Fourier Transform Infrared Difference Spectroscopy of Rhodopsin Mutants: Light Activation of Rhodopsin Causes Hydrogen-Bonding Changes in Residue Aspartic Acid-83 during Meta II Formation. Biochemistry32, 10277–10282. 10.1021/bi00090a001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 692

  Rath P. DeLange F. DeGrip W. J. Rothschild K. J. (1998). Hydrogen Bonding Changes of Internal Water Molecules in Rhodopsin during Metarhodopsin I and Metarhodopsin II Formation. Biochem. J.329, 713–717. 10.1042/bj3290713

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 693

  Rawlinson K. A. Lapraz F. Ballister E. R. Terasaki M. Rodgers J. Mcdowell R. J. et al (2019). Extraocular, Rod-like Photoreceptors in a Flatworm Express Xenopsin Photopigment. eLife8, e45465. 10.7554/eLife.45465

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 694

  Reeves P. J. Kim J.-M. Khorana H. G. (2002). Structure and Function in Rhodopsin: A Tetracycline-Inducible System in Stable Mammalian Cell Lines for High-Level Expression of Opsin Mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.99, 13413–13418. 10.1073/pnas.212519199

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 695

  Reeves P. J. Klein-Seetharaman J. Getmanova E. V. Eilers M. Loewen M. C. Smith S. O. et al (1999). Expression and Purification of Rhodopsin and its Mutants from Stable Mammalian Cell Lines: Application to NMR Studies. Biochem. Soc. Trans.27, 950–955. 10.1042/bst0270950

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 696

  Regan C. M. DeGrip W. J. Daemen F. J. M. Bonting S. L. (1978). Sulfhydryl Group Reactivity as a Probe of Transient Protein Conformational Changes during Rhodopsin Photolysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta537, 145–152. 10.1016/0005-2795(78)90609-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 697

  Ren Z. Ren P. X. Balusu R. Yang X. J. (2016). Transmembrane Helices Tilt, Bend, Slide, Torque, and Unwind between Functional States of Rhodopsin. Sci. Rep.6, 34129. 10.1038/srep34129

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 698

  Ridge K. D. Abdulaev N. G. (2000). Folding and Assembly of Rhodopsin from Expressed Fragments. Meth. Enzymol.315, 59–70. 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)15834-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 699

  Ridge K. D. Lu Z. J. Liu X.-M. Khorana H. G. (1995). Structure and Function in Rhodopsin. Separation and Characterization of the Correctly Folded and Misfolded Opsins Produced on Expression of an Opsin Mutant Gene Containing Only the Native Intradiscal Cysteine Codons. Biochemistry-USA34, 3261–3267. 10.1021/bi00010a016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 700

  Ritchie T. K. Grinkova Y. V. Bayburt T. H. Denisov I. G. Zolnerciks J. K. Atkins W. M. et al (2009). Reconstitution of Membrane Proteins in Phospholipid Bilayer Nanodiscs. Methods Enzym.464, 211–231. 10.1016/s0076-6879(09)64011-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 701

  Ritter E. Zimmermann K. Heck M. Hofmann K. P. Bartl F. J. (2004). Transition of Rhodopsin into the Active Metarhodopsin II State Opens a New Light-Induced Pathway Linked to Schiff Base Isomerization. J. Biol. Chem.279, 48102–48111. 10.1074/jbc.m406857200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 702

  Rodgers J. Bano-Otalora B. Belle M. D. C. Paul S. Hughes R. Wright P. et al (2021). Using a Bistable Animal Opsin for Switchable and Scalable Optogenetic Inhibition of Neurons. Embo Rep.22, 51866. 10.15252/embr.202051866

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 703

  Rödig C. Chizhov I. Weidlich O. Siebert F. (1999). Time-resolved Step-Scan Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Reveals Differences between Early and Late M Intermediates of Bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys. J.76, 2687–2701. 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77421-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 704

  Rohrer B. Goletz P. W. Znoiko S. L. Ablonczy Z. Ma J.-X. Redmond T. M. et al (2003). Correlation of Regenerable Opsin with Rod ERG Signal in RPE65(-/-) Mice during Development and Aging. Investigative Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 310–315. 10.1167/iovs.02-0567

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 705

  Rost B. R. Schneider-Warme F. Schmitz D. Hegemann P. (2017). Optogenetic Tools for Subcellular Applications in Neuroscience. Neuron96, 572–603. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 706

  Rothschild K. J. Andrew J. R. DeGrip W. J. Stanley H. E. (1976). Opsin Structure Probed by Raman Spectroscopy of Photoreceptor Membranes. Science191, 1176–1178. 10.1126/science.1257742

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 707

  Rothschild K. J. Cantore W. A. Marrero H. (1983). Fourier Transform Infrared Difference Spectra of Intermediates in Rhodopsin Bleaching. Science219, 1333–1335. 10.1126/science.6828860

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 708

  Rothschild K. J. DeGrip W. J. Sanches R. (1980). Fourier Transform Infrared Study of Photoreceptor Membrane. I. Group Assignments Based on Rhodopsin Delipidation and Reconstitution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta596, 338–351. 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90121-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 709

  Rothschild K. J. Gillespie J. DeGrip W. J. (1987). Evidence for Rhodopsin Refolding during the Decay of Meta II. Biophys. J.51, 345–350. 10.1016/s0006-3495(87)83341-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 710

  Rothschild K. J. Marrero H. Braiman M. S. Mathies R. A. (1984). Primary Photochemistry of Bacteriorhodopsin - Comparison of Fourier-Transform Infrared Difference Spectra with Resonance Raman-Spectra. Photochem. Photobiol.40, 675–679. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1984.tb05359.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 711

  Rothschild K. J. Marrero H. (1982). Infrared Evidence that the Schiff Base of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Protonated: bR570 and K Intermediates. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.79, 4045–4049. 10.1073/pnas.79.13.4045

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 712

  Rothschild K. J. (2016). The Early Development and Application of FTIR Difference Spectroscopy to Membrane Proteins: A Personal Perspective. Biomed. Spectrosc. Imaging5, 231–267. 10.3233/bsi-160148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 713

  Rothschild K. J. Zagaeski M. Cantore W. A. (1981). Conformational Changes of Bacteriorhodopsin Detected by Fourier Transform Infrared Difference Spectroscopy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.103, 483–489. 10.1016/0006-291x(81)90478-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 714

  Rousso I. Gat Y. Lewis A. Sheves M. Ottolenghi M. (1998). Effective Light-Induced Hydroxylamine Reactions Occur with C-13 = C-14 Nonisomerizable Bacteriorhodopsin Pigments. Biophysical J.75, 413–417. 10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77526-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 715

  Roy P. P. Kato Y. Abe-Yoshizumi R. Pieri E. Ferré N. Kandori H. et al (2018). Mapping the Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of All-Trans and 13-cis Retinal Isomerization in Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20, 30159–30173. 10.1039/c8cp05469j

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 716

  Royant A. Nollert P. Edman K. Neutze R. Landau E. M. Pebay-Peyroula E. et al (2001). X-ray Structure of Sensory Rhodopsin II at 2.1-Å Resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98, 10131–10136. 10.1073/pnas.181203898

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 717

  Rozenberg A. Inoue K. Kandori H. Béjà O. (2021). Microbial Rhodopsins: The Last Two Decades. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.75, 427–447. 10.1146/annurev-micro-031721-020452

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 718

  Rupenyan A. Van Stokkum I. H. M. Arents J. C. Van Grondelle R. Hellingwerf K. J. Groot M. L. (2008). Characterization of the Primary Photochemistry of Proteorhodopsin with Femtosecond Spectroscopy. Biophysical J.94, 4020–4030. 10.1529/biophysj.107.121376

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 719

  Rupenyan A. Van Stokkum I. H. M. Arents J. C. Van Grondelle R. Hellingwerf K. J. Groot M. L. (2009). Reaction Pathways of Photoexcited Retinal in Proteorhodopsin Studied by Pump-Dump-Probe Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B113, 16251–16256. 10.1021/jp9065289

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 720

  Ruprecht J. J. Mielke T. Vogel R. Villa C. Schertler G. F. X. (2004). Electron Crystallography Reveals the Structure of Metarhodopsin I. EMBO J.23, 3609–3620. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600374

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 721

  Ryazantsev M. N. Nikolaev D. M. Struts A. V. Brown M. F. (2019). Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanics Modeling of Membrane-Embedded Rhodopsins. J. Membr. Biol.252, 425–449. 10.1007/s00232-019-00095-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 722

  Ryba N. J. P. Hoon M. A. Findlay J. B. C. Saibil H. R. Wilkinson J. R. Heimburg T. et al (1993). Rhodopsin Mobility, Structure, and Lipid-Protein Interaction in Squid Photoreceptor Membranes. Biochemistry32, 3298–3305. 10.1021/bi00064a012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 723

  Sadaf A. Cho H. C. Byrne B. Chae P. S. (2015). Amphipathic Agents for Membrane Protein Study. Meth. Enzymol.557, 57–94. 10.1016/bs.mie.2014.12.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 724

  Saint Clair E. C. Ogren J. I. Mamaev S. Kralj J. M. Rothschild K. J. (2012a). Conformational Changes in the Archaerhodopsin-3 Proton Pump: Detection of Conserved Strongly Hydrogen Bonded Water Networks. J. Biol. Phys.38, 153–168. 10.1007/s10867-011-9246-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 725

  Saint Clair E. C. Ogren J. I. Mamaev S. Russano D. Kralj J. M. Rothschild K. J. (2012b). Near-IR Resonance Raman Spectroscopy of Archaerhodopsin 3: Effects of Transmembrane Potential. J. Phys. Chem. B116, 14592–14601. 10.1021/jp309996a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 726

  Sakai K. Imamoto Y. Su C.-Y. Tsukamoto H. Yamashita T. Terakita A. et al (2012). Photochemical Nature of Parietopsin. Biochemistry51, 1933–1941. 10.1021/bi2018283

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 727

  Sakai K. Shichida Y. Imamoto Y. Yamashita T. (2022). Creation of Photocyclic Vertebrate Rhodopsin by Single Amino Acid Substitution. eLife11, 75979. 10.7554/elife.75979

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 728

  Sakmar T. P. Fahmy K. (1995). Properties and Photoactivity of Rhodopsin Mutants. Isr. J. Chem.35, 325–337. 10.1002/ijch.199500034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 729

  Sakmar T. P. Franke R. R. Khorana H. G. (1989). Glutamic Acid-113 Serves as the Retinylidene Schiff Base Counterion in Bovine Rhodopsin. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.86, 8309–8313. 10.1073/pnas.86.21.8309

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 730

  Sakmar T. P. Menon S. T. Marin E. P. Awad E. S. (2002). Rhodopsin: Insights from Recent Structural Studies. Annu. Rev. Biophysics Biomol. Struct.31, 443–484. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.31.082901.134348

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 731

  Salcedo E. Huber A. Henrich S. Chadwell L. V. Chou W. H. Paulsen R. et al (1999). Blue- and Green-Absorbing Visual Pigments of Drosophila: Ectopic Expression and Physiological Characterization of the R8 Photoreceptor Cell-specific Rh5 and Rh6 Rhodopsins. J. Neurosci.19, 10716–10726. 10.1523/jneurosci.19-24-10716.1999

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 732

  Salom D. Cao P. X. Sun W. Y. Kramp K. Jastrzebska B. Jin H. et al (2012). Heterologous Expression of Functional G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J.26, 492–502. 10.1096/fj.11-197780

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 733

  Salom D. Jin H. Gerken T. A. Yu C. Huang L. Palczewski K. (2019). Human Red and Green Cone Opsins Are O-Glycosylated at an N-Terminal Ser/Thr-Rich Domain Conserved in Vertebrates. J. Biol. Chem.294, 8123–8133. 10.1074/jbc.ra118.006835

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 734

  Salom D. Wu N. Sun W. Y. Dong Z. Palczewski K. Jordan S. et al (2008). Heterologous Expression and Purification of the Serotonin Type 4 Receptor from Transgenic Mouse Retina. Biochemistry47, 13296–13307. 10.1021/bi8018527

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 735

  Sanchez-Reyes O. B. Cooke A. L. G. Tranter D. B. Rashid D. Eilers M. Reeves P. J. et al (2017). G Protein-Coupled Receptors Contain Two Conserved Packing Clusters. Biophysical J.112, 2315–2326. 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.051

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 736

  Sardet C. Tardieu A. Luzzati V. (1976). Shape and Size of Bovine Rhodopsin: A Small-Angle X-Ray-Scattering Study of A Rhodopsin-Detergent Complex. J. Mol. Biol.105, 383–407. 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90100-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 737

  Sarramegna V. Muller I. Milon A. Talmont F. (2006). Recombinant G Protein-Coupled Receptors from Expression to Renaturation: A Challenge towards Structure. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.63, 1149–1164. 10.1007/s00018-005-5557-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 738

  Sasaki J. Brown L. S. Chon Y.-S. Kandori H. Maeda A. Needleman R. et al (1995). Conversion of Bacteriorhodopsin into a Chloride Ion Pump. Science269, 73–75. 10.1126/science.7604281

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 739

  Sasaki J. Takahashi H. Furutani Y. Kandori H. Spudich J. L. (2011). Sensory Rhodopsin-I as a Bidirectional Switch: Opposite Conformational Changes from the Same Photoisomerization. Biophysical J.100, 2178–2183. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 740

  Sasaki K. Yamashita T. Yoshida K. Inoue K. Shichida Y. Kandori H. (2014). Chimeric Proton-Pumping Rhodopsins Containing the Cytoplasmic Loop of Bovine Rhodopsin. PLoS ONE9, e91323. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091323

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 741

  Sato K. Yamashita T. Imamoto Y. Shichida Y. (2012). Comparative Studies on the Late Bleaching Processes of Four Kinds of Cone Visual Pigments and Rod Visual Pigment. Biochemistry51, 4300–4308. 10.1021/bi3000885

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 742

  Sato K. Yamashita T. Kojima K. Sakai K. Matsutani Y. Yanagawa M. et al (2018a). Pinopsin Evolved as the Ancestral Dim-Light Visual Opsin in Vertebrates. Commun. Biol.1, 156. 10.1038/s42003-018-0164-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 743

  Sato K. Yamashita T. Ohuchi H. Shichida Y. (2011). Vertebrate Ancient-Long Opsin Has Molecular Properties Intermediate between Those of Vertebrate and Invertebrate Visual Pigments. Biochemistry50, 10484–10490. 10.1021/bi201212z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 744

  Sato K. Yamashita T. Ohuchi H. Takeuchi A. Gotoh H. Ono K. et al (2018b). Opn5L1 Is a Retinal Receptor that Behaves as a Reverse and Self-Regenerating Photoreceptor. Nat. Commun.9, 125. 10.1038/s41467-018-03603-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 745

  Schafer C. T. Farrens D. L. (2015). Conformational Selection and Equilibrium Governs the Ability of Retinals to Bind Opsin. J. Biol. Chem.290, 4304–4318. 10.1074/jbc.m114.603134

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 746

  Schäfer G. Shastri S. Verhoefen M.-K. Vogel V. Glaubitz C. Wachtveitl J. et al (2009). Characterizing the Structure and Photocycle of PR 2D Crystals with CD and FTIR Spectroscopy. Photochem. Photobiol.85, 529–534. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00491.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 747

  Schapiro I. Ruhman S. (2014). Ultrafast Photochemistry of Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin: Experiment and Theory. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 589–597. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.09.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 748

  Schapiro I. Ryazantsev M. N. Frutos L. M. Ferré N. Lindh R. Olivucci M. (2011). The Ultrafast Photoisomerizations of Rhodopsin and Bathorhodopsin Are Modulated by Bond Length Alternation and HOOP Driven Electronic Effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 3354–3364. 10.1021/ja1056196

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 749

  Scheerer P. Park J. H. Hildebrand P. W. Kim Y. J. Krauß N. Choe H.-W. et al (2008). Crystal Structure of Opsin in its G-Protein-Interacting Conformation. Nature455, 497–502. 10.1038/nature07330

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 750

  Schertler G. F. X. Hargrave P. A. (1995). Projection Structure of Frog Rhodopsin in Two Crystal Forms. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.92, 11578–11582. 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11578

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 751

  Schertler G. F. X. (2005). Structure of Rhodopsin and the Metarhodopsin I Photointermediate. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.15, 408–415. 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.07.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 752

  Schey K. L. Papac D. I. Knapp D. R. Crouch R. K. (1992). Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Mass Spectrometry of Rhodopsin and Bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys. J.63, 1240–1243. 10.1016/s0006-3495(92)81699-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 753

  Schlinkmann K. M. Plückthun A. (2013). Directed Evolution of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors for High Functional Expression and Detergent Stability. Meth. Enzymol.520, 67–97. 10.1016/b978-0-12-391861-1.00004-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 754

  Schnedermann C. Muders V. Ehrenberg D. Schlesinger R. Kukura P. Heberle J. (2016). Vibronic Dynamics of the Ultrafast All-Trans to 13-cis Photoisomerization of Retinal in Channelrhodopsin-1. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 4757–4762. 10.1021/jacs.5b12251

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 755

  Schnedermann C. Yang X. Liebel M. Spillane K. M. Lugtenburg J. Fernández I. et al (2018). Evidence for a Vibrational Phase-dependent Isotope Effect on the Photochemistry of Vision. Nat. Chem.10, 449–455. 10.1038/s41557-018-0014-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 756

  Schobert B. Cupp-Vickery J. Hornak V. Smith S. O. Lanyi J. K. (2002). Crystallographic Structure of the K Intermediate of Bacteriorhodopsin: Conservation of Free Energy after Photoisomerization of the Retinal. J. Mol. Biol.321, 715–726. 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00681-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 757

  Schoenlein R. W. Peteanu L. A. Mathies R. A. Shank C. V. (1991). The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin. Science254, 412–415. 10.1126/science.1925597

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 758

  Scholz L. Neugebauer J. (2021). Protein Response Effects on Cofactor Excitation Energies from First Principles: Augmenting Subsystem Time-dependent Density-Functional Theory with Many-Body Expansion Techniques. J. Chem. Theory Comput.17, 6105–6121. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00551

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 759

  Schreiber M. Sugihara M. Okada T. Buss V. (2006). Quantum Mechanical Studies on the Crystallographic Model of Bathorhodopsin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.45, 4274–4277. 10.1002/anie.200600585

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 760

  Sekharan S. Yokoyama S. Morokuma K. (2011). Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Structure, Enantioselectivity, and Spectroscopy of Hydroxyretinals and Insights into the Evolution of Color Vision in Small White Butterflies. J. Phys. Chem. B115, 15380–15388. 10.1021/jp208107r

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 761

  Seki T. Isono K. Ozaki K. Tsukahara Y. Shibata-Katsuta Y. Ito M. et al (1998). The Metabolic Pathway of Visual Pigment Chromophore Formation in Drosophila melanogaster - All-Trans (3S)-3-Hydroxyretinal Is Formed from All-Trans Retinal via (3R)-3-Hydroxyretinal in the Dark. Eur. J. Biochem.257, 522–527. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2570522.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 762

  Seki T. Vogt K. (1998). Evolutionary Aspects of the Diversity of Visual Pigment Chromophores in the Class Insecta. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B119, 53–64. 10.1016/s0305-0491(97)00322-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 763

  Shao Y. H. Mei Y. Sundholm D. Kaila V. R. I. (2020). Benchmarking the Performance of Time-dependent Density Functional Theory Methods on Biochromophores. J. Chem. Theory Comput.16, 587–600. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00823

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 764

  Sharma K. Jäckel Z. Schneider A. Paul O. Diester I. Ruther P. (2021). Multifunctional Optrode for Opsin Delivery, Optical Stimulation, and Electrophysiological Recordings in Freely Moving Rats. J. neural Eng.18, 066013. 10.1088/1741-2552/ac3206

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 765

  Shen C. Jin X. Glover W. J. He X. (2021). Accurate Prediction of Absorption Spectral Shifts of Proteorhodopsin Using a Fragment-Based Quantum Mechanical Method. Molecules26, 4486. 10.3390/molecules26154486

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 766

  Shen W. L. Kwon Y. Adegbola A. A. Luo J. J. Chess A. Montell C. (2011). Function of Rhodopsin in Temperature Discrimination in Drosophila. Science331, 1333–1336. 10.1126/science.1198904

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 767

  Shen Y. Campbell R. E. Cote D. C. Paquet M. E. (2020). Challenges for Therapeutic Applications of Opsin-Based Optogenetic Tools in Humans. Front. Neural Circuits14, 41. 10.3389/fncir.2020.00041

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 768

  Sheves M. Friedman N. (1986). Influence of External Negative Charges on the Absorption Maxima of Symmetrical Cyanines. A Study with Model Compounds and Artificial Bacteriorhodopsin Pigments. Angewandte Chemie-International Ed. Engl.25, 284–286. 10.1002/anie.198602841

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 769

  Shi L. C. Ahmed M. a. M. Zhang W. R. Whited G. Brown L. S. Ladizhansky V. (2009). Three-dimensional Solid-State NMR Study of a Seven-Helical Integral Membrane Proton Pump-Structural Insights. J. Mol. Biol.386, 1078–1093. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 770

  Shibata M. Inoue K. Ikeda K. Konno M. Singh M. Kataoka C. et al (2018). Oligomeric States of Microbial Rhodopsins Determined by High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy and Circular Dichroic Spectroscopy. Sci. Rep.8, 8262. 10.1038/s41598-018-26606-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 771

  Shichida Y. Kobayashi T. Ohtani H. Yoshizawa T. Nagakura S. (1978). Picosecond Laser Photolysis of Squid Rhodopsin at Room and Low-Temperatures. Photochem. Photobiol.27, 335–341. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1978.tb07609.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 772

  Shichida Y. (1986). Primary Intermediates of Photobleaching of Rhodopsin. Photobiochem. Photobiophys.13, 287–307.

  • Google Scholar

• 773

  Shichida Y. (1990). Ultra-fast Laser Spectroscopy of Visual Pigments. Photochem. Photobiol.52, 1179–1185. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb08456.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 774

  Shigeta A. Ito S. Inoue K. Okitsu T. Wada A. Kandori H. et al (2017). Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structural Study of the Retinal-Binding Pocket in Sodium Ion Pump Rhodopsin. Biochemistry56, 543–550. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00999

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 775

  Shihoya W. Inoue K. Singh M. Konno M. Hososhima S. Yamashita K. et al (2019). Crystal Structure of Heliorhodopsin. Nature574, 132–136. 10.1038/s41586-019-1604-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 776

  Shim J.-G. Kang N.-R. Chuon K. Cho S.-G. Meas S. Jung K.-H. (2022). Mutational Analyses Identify a Single Amino Acid Critical for Color Tuning in Proteorhodopsins. FEBS Lett.596, 784. 10.1002/1873-3468.14297

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 777

  Shim J.-G. Soum V. Kang K.-W. Chuon K. Cho S.-G. Kim J.-H. et al (2021). Discovery of a Microbial Rhodopsin that Is the Most Stable in Extreme Environments. iScience24, 102620. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102620

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 778

  Shimamura T. Hiraki K. Takahashi N. Hori T. Ago H. Masuda K. et al (2008). Crystal Structure of Squid Rhodopsin with Intracellularly Extended Cytoplasmic Region. J. Biol. Chem.283, 17753–17756. 10.1074/jbc.c800040200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 779

  Shimono K. Ikeura Y. Sudo Y. Iwamoto M. Kamo N. (2001). Environment Around the Chromophore in Pharaonis Phoborhodopsin: Mutation Analysis of the Retinal Binding Site. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes1515, 92–100. 10.1016/s0005-2736(01)00394-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 780

  Shirzad-Wasei N. DeGrip W. J. (2016). Heterologous Expression of Melanopsin: Present, Problems and Prospects. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.52, 1–21. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.02.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 781

  Shirzad-Wasei N. Van Oostrum J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Kusters L. J. A. Bosman G. J. C. G. M. DeGrip W. J. (2015). Rapid Transfer of Overexpressed Integral Membrane Protein from the Host Membrane into Soluble Lipid Nanodiscs without Previous Purification. Biol. Chem.396, 903–915. 10.1515/hsz-2015-0100

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 782

  Shirzad-Wasei N. Van Oostrum J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Wasserman M. Bosman G. J. C. G. M. DeGrip W. J. (2013). Large Scale Expression and Purification of Mouse Melanopsin-L in the Baculovirus Expression System. Protein Expr. Purif.91, 134–146. 10.1016/j.pep.2013.07.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 783

  Shtyrov A. A. Nikolaev D. M. Mironov V. N. Vasin A. V. Panov M. S. Tveryanovich Y. S. et al (2021). Simple Models to Study Spectral Properties of Microbial and Animal Rhodopsins: Evaluation of the Electrostatic Effect of Charged and Polar Residues on the First Absorption Band Maxima. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 3029. 10.3390/ijms22063029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 784

  Sineshchekov O. A. Govorunova E. G. Wang J. H. Spudich J. L. (2012). Enhancement of Long-Wavelength Sensitivity of Optogenetic Microbial Rhodopsins by 3, 4-dehydroretinal. Biochemistry51, 4499–4506. 10.1021/bi2018859

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 785

  Singh M. Inoue K. Pushkarev A. Béjà O. Kandori H. (2018). Mutation Study of Heliorhodopsin 48C12. Biochemistry57, 5041–5049. 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00637

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 786

  Skopintsev P. Ehrenberg D. Weinert T. James D. Kar R. K. Johnson P. J. M. et al (2020). Femtosecond-to-millisecond Structural Changes in a Light-Driven Sodium Pump. Nature583, 314–322. 10.1038/s41586-020-2307-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 787

  Smith S. O. Aschheim K. Groesbeek M. (1996). Magic Angle Spinning NMR Spectroscopy of Membrane Proteins. Quart. Rev. Biophys.29, 395–449. 10.1017/s0033583500005898

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 788

  Smith S. O. De Groot H. J. M. Gebhard R. Courtin J. M. L. Lugtenburg J. Herzfeld J. et al (1989). Structure and Protein Environment of the Retinal Chromophore in Light-Adapted and Dark-Adapted Bacteriorhodopsin Studied by Solid-State NMR. Biochemistry28, 8897–8904. 10.1021/bi00448a032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 789

  Smith S. O. De Groot H. J. M. Gebhard R. Lugtenburg J. (1992). Magic Angle Spinning NMR Studies on the Metarhodopsin II Intermediate of Bovine Rhodopsin: Evidence for an Unprotonated Schiff Base. Photochem. Photobiol.56, 1035–1039. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb09726.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 790

  Smith S. O. (2021). Deconstructing the Transmembrane Core of Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Trends Biochem. Sci.46, 1017. 10.1016/j.tibs.2021.08.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 791

  Smith S. O. Myers A. B. Mathies R. A. Pardoen J. A. Winkel C. Vandenberg E. M. M. et al (1985). Vibrational Analysis of the All-Trans Retinal Protonated Schiff Base. Biophys. J.47, 653–664. 10.1016/s0006-3495(85)83961-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 792

  Smith S. O. (2010). Structure and Activation of the Visual Pigment Rhodopsin. Annu. Rev. Biophysics39, 309–328. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-101209-104901

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 793

  Smitienko O. A. Feldman T. B. Petrovskaya L. E. Nekrasova O. V. Yakovleva M. A. Shelaev I. V. et al (2021). Comparative Femtosecond Spectroscopy of Primary Photoreactions of Exiguobacterium Sibiricum Rhodopsin and Halobacterium Salinarum Bacteriorhodopsin. J. Phys. Chem. B125, 995–1008. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c07763

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 794

  Smitienko O. A. Nekrasova O. V. Kudriavtsev A. V. Yakovleva M. A. Shelaev I. V. Gostev F. E. et al (2017). Femtosecond and Picosecond Dynamics of Recombinant Bacteriorhodopsin Primary Reactions Compared to the Native Protein in Trimeric and Monomeric Forms. Biochemistry-Moscow82, 490–500. 10.1134/S0006297917040113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 795

  Sneskov K. Olsen J. M. H. Schwabe T. Hãttig C. Christiansen O. Kongsted J. (2013). Computational Screening of One- and Two-Photon Spectrally Tuned Channelrhodopsin Mutants. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.15, 7567–7576. 10.1039/c3cp44350g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 796

  Sonar S. Liu X.-M. Lee C.-P. Coleman M. He Y.-W. Pelletier S. et al (1995). Site-directed Isotope Labeling and FT-IR Spectroscopy: The Tyr 185/Pro 186 Peptide Bond of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Perturbed during the Primary Photoreaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.117, 11614–11615. 10.1021/ja00151a041

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 797

  Song Y. Z. Cartron M. L. Jackson P. J. Davison P. A. Dickman M. J. Zhu D. et al (2020). Proteorhodopsin Overproduction Enhances the Long-Term Viability of Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.86, 02087–02019. 10.1128/AEM.02087-19

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 798

  Soni B. G. Foster R. G. (1997). A Novel and Ancient Vertebrate Opsin. FEBS Lett.406, 279–283. 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00287-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 799

  Spooner P. J. R. Sharples J. M. Goodall S. C. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Verhoeven M. A. Lugtenburg J. et al (2004). The Ring of the Rhodopsin Chromophore in a Hydrophobic Activation Switch within the Binding Pocket. J. Mol. Biol.343, 719–730. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 800

  Spudich J. L. Sineshchekov O. A. Govorunova E. G. (2014). Mechanism Divergence in Microbial Rhodopsins. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 546–552. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.06.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 801

  Spudich J. L. Yang C.-S. Jung K.-H. Spudich E. N. (2000). Retinylidene Proteins: Structures and Functions from Archaea to Humans. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol.16, 365–392. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.365

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 802

  Sridharan S. Gajowa M. A. Ogando M. B. Jagadisan U. K. Abdeladim L. Sadahiro M. et al (2022). High-performance Microbial Opsins for Spatially and Temporally Precise Perturbations of Large Neuronal Networks. Neuron110, 1–17. 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 803

  Srinivasan S. Ramon E. Cordomí A. Garriga P. (2014). Binding Specificity of Retinal Analogs to Photoactivated Visual Pigments Suggest Mechanism for Fine-Tuning GPCR-Ligand Interactions. Chem. Biol.21, 369–378. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 804

  Standfuss J. Xie G. F. Edwards P. C. Burghammer M. Oprian D. D. Schertler G. F. X. (2007). Crystal Structure of a Thermally Stable Rhodopsin Mutant. J. Mol. Biol.372, 1179–1188. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 805

  Stavenga D. G. Oberwinkler J. Postma M. (2000). “Modeling Primary Visual Processes in Insect Photoreceptors,” in Molecular Mechanisms in Visual Transduction. Editors StavengaD. G.DeGripW. J.PughJr.E. N. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Pub.), 527–574. 10.1016/s1383-8121(00)80013-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 806

  Steinhoff H.-J. Mollaaghababa R. Altenbach C. A. Khorana H. G. Hubbell W. L. (1995). Site Directed Spin Labeling Studies of Structure and Dynamics in Bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys. Chem.56, 89–94. 10.1016/0301-4622(95)00019-t

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 807

  Stenkamp R. E. (2008). Alternative Models for Two Crystal Structures of Bovine Rhodopsin. Acta Crystallogr. d-biol. Cryst.64, 902–904. 10.1107/s0907444908017162

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 808

  Steward L. E. Chamberlin A. R. (1998). Protein Engineering with Nonstandard Amino Acids. Meth. Mol. Biol.77, 325–354. 10.1385/0-89603-397-X:325

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 809

  Struts A. V. Salgado G. F. J. Tanaka K. Krane S. Nakanishi K. Brown M. F. (2007). Structural Analysis and Dynamics of Retinal Chromophore in Dark and Metal States of Rhodopsin from ²H NMR of Aligned Membranes. J. Mol. Biol.372, 50–66. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.046

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 810

  Stubbs G. W. Smith H. G. Litman B. J. (1976). Alkyl Glucosides as Effective Solubilizing Agents for Bovine Rhodopsin - A Comparison with Several Commonly Used Detergents. Biochim. Biophys. Acta426, 46–56. 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90428-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 811

  Su C.-Y. Luo D.-G. Terakita A. Shichida Y. Liao H.-W. Kazmi M. A. et al (2006). Parietal-eye Phototransduction Components and Their Potential Evolutionary Implications. Science311, 1617–1621. 10.1126/science.1123802

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 812

  Subramaniam S. Lindahl I. Bullough P. A. Faruqi A. R. Tittor J. Oesterhelt D. et al (1999). Protein Conformational Changes in the Bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle. J. Mol. Biol.287, 145–161. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2589

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 813

  Sudo Y. Ihara K. Kobayashi S. Suzuki D. Irieda H. Kikukawa T. et al (2011). A Microbial Rhodopsin with a Unique Retinal Composition Shows Both Sensory Rhodopsin II and Bacteriorhodopsin-like Properties. J. Biol. Chem.286, 5967–5976. 10.1074/jbc.m110.190058

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 814

  Sudo Y. Okazaki A. Ono H. Yagasaki J. Sugo S. Kamiya M. et al (2013). A Blue-Shifted Light-Driven Proton Pump for Neural Silencing. J. Biol. Chem.288, 20624–20632. 10.1074/jbc.m113.475533

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 815

  Sugimoto T. Katayama K. Kandori H. (2021). Role of Thr82 for the Unique Photochemistry of TAT Rhodopsin. Biophysics Physicobiology18, 108–115. 10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 816

  Sun H. Gilbert D. J. Copeland N. G. Jenkins N. A. Nathans J. (1997). Peropsin, a Novel Visual Pigment-like Protein Located in the Apical Microvilli of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.94, 9893–9898. 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9893

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 817

  Sun Y. Li M. J. Cao S. Xu Y. Wu P. Xu S. et al (2022). Optogenetics for Understanding and Treating Brain Injury: Advances in the Field and Future Prospects. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 1800. 10.3390/ijms23031800

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 818

  Suzuki E. Katayama E. Hirosawa K. (1993). Structure of Photoreceptive Membranes of Drosophila Compound Eyes as Studied by Quick-Freezing Electron Microscopy. J. Electron Microsc.42, 178–184.

  • Google Scholar

• 819

  Suzuki K. Del Carmen Marín M. Konno M. Bagherzadeh R. Murata T. Inoue K. (2022). Structural Characterization of Proton-Pumping Rhodopsin Lacking a Cytoplasmic Proton Donor Residue by X-Ray Crystallography. J. Biol. Chem.298, 101722. 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101722

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 820

  Tahara S. Kuramochi H. Takeuchi S. Tahara T. (2019a). Protein Dynamics Preceding Photoisomerization of the Retinal Chromophore in Bacteriorhodopsin Revealed by Deep-UV Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 5422–5427. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02283

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 821

  Tahara S. Singh M. Kuramochi H. Shihoya W. Inoue K. Nureki O. et al (2019b). Ultrafast Dynamics of Heliorhodopsins. J. Phys. Chem. B123, 2507–2512. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b00887

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 822

  Tahara S. Takeuchi S. Abe-Yoshizumi R. Inoue K. Ohtani H. Kandori H. et al (2015). Ultrafast Photoreaction Dynamics of a Light-Driven Sodium-Ion-Pumping Retinal Protein from Krokinobacter Eikastus Revealed by Femtosecond Time-Resolved Absorption Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.6, 4481–4486. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01994

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 823

  Takayama R. Kaneko A. Okitsu T. Tsunoda S. P. Shimono K. Mizuno M. et al (2018). Production of a Light-Gated Proton Channel by Replacing the Retinal Chromophore with its Synthetic Vinylene Derivative. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.9, 2857–2862. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00879

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 824

  Tam B. M. Moritz O. L. (2009). The Role of Rhodopsin Glycosylation in Protein Folding, Trafficking, and Light-Sensitive Retinal Degeneration. J. Neurosci.29, 15145–15154. 10.1523/jneurosci.4259-09.2009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 825

  Tan P. He L. Huang Y. Zhou Y. (2022). Optophysiology: Illuminating Cell Physiology with Optogenetics. Physiol. Rev.102, 1263. 10.1152/physrev.00021.2021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 826

  Tanaka T. Singh M. Shihoya W. Yamashita K. Kandori H. Nureki O. (2020). Structural Basis for Unique Color Tuning Mechanism in Heliorhodopsin. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun.533, 262–267. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.06.124

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 827

  Tansley K. (1931). The Regeneration of Visual Purple: its Relation to Dark Adaptation and Night Blindness. J. Physiology71, 442–458. 10.1113/jphysiol.1931.sp002749

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 828

  Tarttelin E. E. Bellingham J. Hankins M. W. Foster R. G. Lucas R. J. (2003). Neuropsin (Opn5): A Novel Opsin Identified in Mammalian Neural Tissue. FEBS Lett.554, 410–416. 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01212-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 829

  Tarttelin E. E. Fransen M. P. Edwards P. C. Hankins M. W. Schertler G. F. X. Vogel R. et al (2011). Adaptation of Pineal Expressed Teleost Exo-Rod Opsin to Non-image Forming Photoreception through Enhanced Meta II Decay. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.68, 3713–3723. 10.1007/s00018-011-0665-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 830

  Tastan O. Dutta A. Booth P. J. Klein-Seetharaman J. (2014). Retinal Proteins as Model Systems for Membrane Protein Folding. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1837, 656–663. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.11.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 831

  Tavanti F. Tozzini V. (2014). A Multi-Scale-Multi-Stable Model for the Rhodopsin Photocycle. Molecules19, 14961–14978. 10.3390/molecules190914961

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 832

  Terakita A. Koyanagi M. Tsukamoto H. Yamashita T. Miyata T. Shichida Y. (2004). Counterion Displacement in the Molecular Evolution of the Rhodopsin Family. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.11, 284–289. 10.1038/nsmb731

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 833

  Terakita A. (2005). The Opsins. Genome Biol.6, 213. 10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-213

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 834

  Tian Y. Yang S. Nagel G. Gao S. Q. (2022). Characterization and Modification of Light-Sensitive Phosphodiesterases from Choanoflagellates. Biomolecules12, 88. 10.3390/biom12010088

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 835

  Tkatch T. Greotti E. Baranauskas G. Pendin D. Roy S. Nita L. I. et al (2017). Optogenetic Control of Mitochondrial Metabolism and Ca²⁺ Signaling by Mitochondria-Targeted Opsins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.114, E5167–E5176. 10.1073/pnas.1703623114

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 836

  Toba Y. Hanawa I. (1985). Photoreceptor Sensitivity as a Function of Rhodopsin Content in the Isolated Bullfrog Retina. Jpn. J. Physiology35, 483–494. 10.2170/jjphysiol.35.483

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 837

  Tomida S. Ito S. Mato T. Furutani Y. Inoue K. Kandori H. (2020). Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis on Structural Changes Around the Protonated Schiff Base upon Retinal Isomerization in Light-Driven Sodium Pump KR2. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1861, 148190. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2020.148190

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 838

  Tomida S. Kitagawa S. Kandori H. Furutani Y. (2021). Inverse Hydrogen-Bonding Change between the Protonated Retinal Schiff Base and Water Molecules upon Photoisomerization in Heliorhodopsin 48C12. J. Phys. Chem. B125, 8331–8341. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c01907

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 839

  Tomobe K. Yamamoto E. Kholmurodov K. Yasuoka K. (2017). Water Permeation through the Internal Water Pathway in Activated GPCR Rhodopsin. PLoS ONE12, e0176876. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176876

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 840

  Townson S. M. Chang B. S. W. Salcedo E. Chadwell L. V. Pierce N. E. Britt S. G. (1998). Honeybee Blue-And Ultraviolet-Sensitive Opsins: Cloning, Heterologous Expression in Drosophila, and Physiological Characterization. J. Neurosci.18, 2412–2422. 10.1523/jneurosci.18-07-02412.1998

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 841

  Tribet C. Audebert R. Popot J.-L. (1996). Amphipols: Polymers that Keep Membrane Proteins Soluble in Aqueous Solutions. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.93, 15047–15050. 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 842

  Tsai C.-J. Marino J. Adaixo R. Pamulal F. Muehle J. Maeda S. et al (2019). Cryo-EM Structure of the Rhodopsin-Gαι-Βγ Complex Reveals Binding of the Rhodopsin C-Terminal Tail to the Gβ Subunit. Elife8, 46041. 10.7554/elife.46041

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 843

  Tsujimura M. Ishikita H. (2020). Insights into the Protein Functions and Absorption Wavelengths of Microbial Rhodopsins. J. Phys. Chem. B124, 11819–11826. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c08910

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 844

  Tsujimura M. Noji T. Saito K. Kojima K. Sudo Y. Ishikita H. (2021). Mechanism of Absorption Wavelength Shifts in Anion Channelrhodopsin-1 Mutants. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1862, 148349. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2020.148349

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 845

  Tsukamoto H. Szundi I. Lewis J. W. Farrens D. L. Kliger D. S. (2011). Rhodopsin in Nanodiscs Has Native Membrane-like Photointermediates. Biochemistry50, 5086–5091. 10.1021/bi200391a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 846

  Tsukamoto H. Terakita A. (2010). Diversity and Functional Properties of Bistable Pigments. Photochem. Photobiological Sci.9, 1435–1443. 10.1039/c0pp00168f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 847

  Tsukamoto T. Mizutani K. Hasegawa T. Takahashi M. Honda N. Hashimoto N. et al (2016). X-ray Crystallographic Structure of Thermophilic Rhodopsin - Implications For High Thermal Stability and Optogenetic Function. J. Biol. Chem.291, 12223–12232. 10.1074/jbc.m116.719815

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 848

  Tsunoda S. P. Ewers D. Gazzarrini S. Moroni A. Gradmann D. Hegemann P. (2006). H⁺-pumping Rhodopsin from the Marine Alga Acetabularia. Biophysical J.91, 1471–1479. 10.1529/biophysj.106.086421

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 849

  Tsunoda S. P. Sugiura M. Kandori H. (2021). “Molecular Properties and Optogenetic Applications of Enzymerhodopsins,” in Optogenetics: Light-Sensing Proteins and Their Applications in Neuroscience and beyond. Editors YawoH.KandoriH.KoizumiA.KageyamaR.. 2nd ed (Singapore: Springer), 153–165. 10.1007/978-981-15-8763-4_9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 850

  Tu C.-H. Yi H.-P. Hsieh S.-Y. Lin H.-S. Yang C.-S. (2018). Overexpression of Different Types of Microbial Rhodopsins with a Highly Expressible Bacteriorhodopsin from Haloarcula Marismortui as a Single Protein in E. coli. Sci. Rep.8, 14026. 10.1038/s41598-018-32399-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 851

  Tutol J. N. Lee J. Chi H. C. Faizuddin F. N. Abeyrathna S. S. Zhou Q. et al (2021). A Single Point Mutation Converts a Proton-Pumping Rhodopsin into a Red-Shifted, Turn-On Fluorescent Sensor for Chloride. Chem. Sci.12, 5655–5663. 10.1039/d0sc06061e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 852

  Ueta T. Kojima K. Hino T. Shibata M. Nagano S. Sudo Y. (2020). Applicability of Styrene-Maleic Acid Copolymer for Two Microbial Rhodopsins, RxR and HsSRI. Biophysical J.119, 1760–1770. 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.09.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 853

  Urner L. H. Liko I. Yen H.-Y. Hoi K.-K. Bolla J. R. Gault J. et al (2020). Modular Detergents Tailor the Purification and Structural Analysis of Membrane Proteins Including G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Nat. Commun.11, 564. 10.1038/s41467-020-14424-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 854

  Valdez-Lopez J. C. Petr S. T. Donohue M. P. Bailey R. J. Gebreeziabher M. Cameron E. G. et al (2020). The C-Terminus and Third Cytoplasmic Loop Cooperatively Activate Mouse Melanopsin Phototransduction. Biophysical J.119, 389–401. 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.06.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 855

  Van Der Steen R. Biesheuvel P. L. Mathies R. A. Lugtenburg J. (1986). Retinal Analogs with Locked 6-7 Conformations Show that Bacteriorhodopsin Requires the 6-S-Trans Conformation of the Chromophore. J. Am. Chem. Soc.108, 6410–6411. 10.1021/ja00280a060

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 856

  Van Eps N. Caro L. N. Morizumi T. Kusnetzow A. K. Szczepek M. Hofmann K. P. et al (2017). Conformational Equilibria of Light-Activated Rhodopsin in Nanodiscs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.114, E3268–E3275. 10.1073/pnas.1620405114

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 857

  VanAken T. Foxall-Vanaken S. Castleman S. Ferguson-Miller S. (1986). Alkyl Glycoside Detergents: Synthesis and Applications to the Study of Membrane Proteins. Methods Enzym.125, 27–35. 10.1016/s0076-6879(86)25005-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 858

  Varma N. Mutt E. Mühle J. Panneels V. Terakita A. Deupi X. et al (2019). Crystal Structure of Jumping Spider Rhodopsin-1 as a Light Sensitive GPCR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.116, 14547–14556. 10.1073/pnas.1902192116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 859

  Verdegem P. J. E. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. DeGrip W. J. Lugtenburg J. De Groot H. J. M. (1999). Retinylidene Ligand Structure in Bovine Rhodopsin, Metarhodopsin I, and 10-methylrhodopsin from Internuclear Distance Measurements Using ¹³C-Labeling and 1-D Rotational Resonance MAS NMR. Biochemistry-USA38, 11316–11324. 10.1021/bi983014e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 860

  Verhoefen M.-K. Schäfer G. Shastri S. Weber I. Glaubitz C. Mäntele W. et al (2011). Low Temperature FTIR Spectroscopy Provides New Insights in the pH-dependent Proton Pathway of Proteorhodopsin. Biochimica Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics1807, 1583–1590. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.09.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 861

  Verhoeven M. A. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. De Groot H. J. M. Lugtenburg J. DeGrip W. J. (2006). Methyl Substituents at the 11- or 12-position of Retinal Profoundly and Differentially Affect Photochemistry and Signalling Activity of Rhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol.363, 98–113. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 862

  Verhoeven M. A. Creemers A. F. L. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. DeGrip W. J. Lugtenburg J. De Groot H. J. M. (2001). Ultra-high-field MAS NMR Assay of a Multispin Labeled Ligand Bound to its G-Protein Receptor Target in the Natural Membrane Environment: Electronic Structure of the Retinylidene Chromophore in Rhodopsin. Biochemistry40, 3282–3288. 10.1021/bi0023798

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 863

  Vierock J. Rodriguez-Rozada S. Dieter A. Pieper F. Sims R. Tenedini F. et al (2021). BiPOLES Is an Optogenetic Tool Developed for Bidirectional Dual-Color Control of Neurons. Nat. Commun.12, 4527. 10.1038/s41467-021-24759-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 864

  Villette V. Chavarha M. Dimov I. K. Bradley J. Pradhan L. Mathieu B. et al (2019). Ultrafast Two-Photon Imaging of a High-Gain Voltage Indicator in Awake Behaving Mice. Cell.179, 1590–1609. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 865

  Vissers P. M. a. M. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Portier M. D. Klaassen C. H. W. DeGrip W. J. (1998). Large-scale Production and Purification of the Human Green Cone Pigment: Characterization of Late Photo-Intermediates. Biochem. J.330, 1201–1208. 10.1042/bj3301201

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 866

  Vissers P. M. a. M. DeGrip W. J. (1996). Functional Expression of Human Cone Pigments Using Recombinant Baculovirus: Compatibility with Histidine Tagging and Evidence for N-Glycosylation. FEBS Lett.396, 26–30. 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01064-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 867

  Vlasov A. V. Maliar N. L. Bazhenov S. V. Nikelshparg E. I. Brazhe N. A. Vlasova A. D. et al (2020). Raman Scattering: From Structural Biology to Medical Applications. Crystals10, 38–3149. 10.3390/cryst10010038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 868

  Vöcking O. Leclère L. Hausen H. (2021). The Rhodopsin-Retinochrome System for Retinal Re-isomerization Predates the Origin of Cephalopod Eyes. BMC Ecol. Evol.21, 1–141. 10.1186/s12862-021-01939-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 869

  Vogel R. Mahalingam M. Lüdeke S. Huber T. Siebert F. Sakmar T. P. (2008). Functional Role of the "Ionic Lock" - an Interhelical Hydrogen-Bond Network in Family a Heptahelical Receptors. J. Mol. Biol.380, 648–655. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 870

  Vogel R. Sakmar T. P. Sheves M. Siebert F. (2007). Coupling of Protonation Switches during Rhodopsin Activation. Photochem. Photobiol.83, 286–292. 10.1562/2006-06-19-ir-937

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 871

  Vogeley L. Sineshchekov O. A. Trivedi V. D. Sasaki J. Spudich J. L. Luecke H. (2004). Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin: A Photochromic Color Sensor at 2.0 Å. Science306, 1390–1393. 10.1126/science.1103943

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 872

  Vogt A. Guo Y. Tsunoda S. P. Kateriya S. Elstner M. Hegemann P. (2015). Conversion of a Light-Driven Proton Pump into a Light-Gated Ion Channel. Sci. Rep.5, 16450. 10.1038/srep16450

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 873

  Vogt A. Silapetere A. Grimm C. Heiser F. Möller M. A. Hegemann P. (2019). Engineered Passive Potassium Conductance in the KR2 Sodium Pump. Biophysical J.116, 1941–1951. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.04.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 874

  Vogt K. Kirschfeld K. (1984). Chemical Identity of the Chromophores of Fly Visual Pigment. Naturwissenschaften71, 211–213. 10.1007/bf00490436

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 875

  Volkov O. Kovalev K. Polovinkin V. Borshchevskiy V. Bamann C. Astashkin R. et al (2017). Structural Insights into Ion Conduction by Channelrhodopsin 2. Science358, eaan8862. 10.1126/science.aan8862

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 876

  Vought B. W. Dukkipati A. Max M. Knox B. E. Birge R. R. (1999). Photochemistry of the Primary Event in Short-Wavelength Visual Opsins at Low Temperature. Biochemistry-USA38, 11287–11297. 10.1021/bi990968b

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 877

  Vought B. W. Salcedo E. Chadwell L. V. Britt S. G. Birge R. R. Knox B. E. (2000). Characterization of the Primary Photointermediates of Drosophila Rhodopsin. Biochemistry39, 14128–14137. 10.1021/bi001135k

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 878

  Wada A. Fujioka N. Tanaka Y. Ito M. (2000). A Highly Stereoselective Synthesis of 11Z-Retinal Using Tricarbonyliron Complex. J. Org. Chem.65, 2438–2443. 10.1021/jo9916030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 879

  Wada T. Shimono K. Kikukawa T. Hato M. Shinya N. Kim S.-Y. et al (2011). Crystal Structure of the Eukaryotic Light-Driven Proton-Pumping Rhodopsin, Acetabularia Rhodopsin II, from Marine Alga. J. Mol. Biol.411, 986–998. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.06.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 880

  Wagner M. J. Savall J. Hernandez O. Mel G. Inan H. Rumyantsev O. et al (2021). A Neural Circuit State Change Underlying Skilled Movements. Cell.184, 3731–3747. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 881

  Wagner N. L. Greco J. A. Ranaghan M. J. Birge R. R. (2013). Directed Evolution of Bacteriorhodopsin for Applications in Bioelectronics. J. R. Soc. Interface10, 201301971. 10.1098/rsif.2013.0197

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 882

  Wald G. Brown P. K. (1953). The Molar Extinction of Rhodopsin. J. General Physiology37, 189–200. 10.1085/jgp.37.2.189

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 883

  Wald G. (1935). Carotenoids and the Visual Cycle. J. General Physiology19, 351–371. 10.1085/jgp.19.2.351

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 884

  Wald G. (1953). The Biochemistry of Vision. Annu. Rev. Biochem.22, 497–526. 10.1146/annurev.bi.22.070153.002433

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 885

  Wald G. (1968). The Molecular Basis of Visual Excitation. Nature219, 800–807. 10.1038/219800a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 886

  Walter J. M. Greenfield D. Liphardt J. (2010). Potential of Light-Harvesting Proton Pumps for Bioenergy Applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.21, 265–270. 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.03.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 887

  Wand A. Gdor I. Zhu J. Y. Sheves M. Ruhman S. (2013). Shedding New Light on Retinal Protein Photochemistry. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.64, 437–458. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 888

  Wang N. Wang M. T. Gao Y. Y. Ran T. T. Lan Y. L. Wang J. et al (2012). Crystallization and Preliminary X-Ray Crystallographic Analysis of a Blue-Light-Absorbing Proteorhodopsin. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F-Structural Biol. Cryst. Commun.68, 281–283. 10.1107/s1744309111043612

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 889

  Wang S. L. Munro R. A. Shi L. C. Kawamura I. Okitsu T. Wada A. et al (2013). Solid-state NMR Spectroscopy Structure Determination of a Lipid-Embedded Heptahelical Membrane Protein. Nat. Methods10, 1007–1012. 10.1038/nmeth.2635

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 890

  Wang Y.-J. Bovee-Geurts P. H. M. Lugtenburg J. DeGrip W. J. (2004). Constraints of the 9-methyl Group Binding Pocket of the Rhodopsin Chromophore Probed by 9-halogeno Substitution. Biochemistry43, 14802–14810. 10.1021/bi048404h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 891

  Wang Y. Li Y. Xu T. Shi Z. Y. Wu Q. (2015). Experimental Evidence for Growth Advantage and Metabolic Shift Stimulated by Photophosphorylation of Proteorhodopsin Expressed in Escherichia coli at Anaerobic Condition. Biotechnol. Bioeng.112, 947–956. 10.1002/bit.25504

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 892

  Wang Z. Y. Asenjo A. B. Oprian D. D. (1993). Identification of the Cl^-Bbinding Site in the Human Red and Green Color Vision Pigments. Biochemistry-USA32, 2125–2130. 10.1021/bi00060a001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 893

  Warrant E. J. Locket N. A. (2004). Vision in the Deep Sea. Biol. Rev.79, 671–712. 10.1017/s1464793103006420

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 894

  Warrant E. J. Mciintyre P. D. (1993). Arthropod Eye Design and the Physical Limits to Spatial Resolving Power. Prog. Neurobiol.40, 413–461. 10.1016/0301-0082(93)90017-m

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 895

  Watari M. Ikuta T. Yamada D. Shihoya W. Yoshida K. Tsunoda S. P. et al (2019). Spectroscopic Study of the Transmembrane Domain of a Rhodopsin-Phosphodiesterase Fusion Protein from a Unicellular Eukaryote. J. Biol. Chem.294, 3432–3443. 10.1074/jbc.ra118.006277

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 896

  Weinert T. Skopintsev P. James D. Dworkowski F. Panepucci E. Kekilli D. et al (2019). Proton Uptake Mechanism in Bacteriorhodopsin Captured by Serial Synchrotron Crystallography. Science365, 61–65. 10.1126/science.aaw8634

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 897

  Weingart O. (2007). The Twisted C11=C12 Bond of the Rhodopsin Chromophore - A Photochemical Hot Spot. J. Am. Chem. Soc.129, 10618–10619. 10.1021/ja071793t

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 898

  Weissbecker J. Boumrifak C. Breyer M. Wiessalla T. Shevchenko V. Mager T. et al (2021). The Voltage Dependent Sidedness of the Reprotonation of the Retinal Schiff Base Determines the Unique Inward Pumping of Xenorhodopsin. Angew. Chemie-International Ed.60, 23010–23017. 10.1002/anie.202103882

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 899

  Werner K. Lehner I. Dhiman H. K. Richter C. Glaubitz C. Schwalbe H. et al (2007). Combined Solid State and Solution NMR Studies of α, ε-¹⁵N Labeled Bovine Rhodopsin. J. Biomol. NMR37, 303–312. 10.1007/s10858-007-9143-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 900

  Wickstrand C. Dods R. Royant A. Neutze R. (2015). Bacteriorhodopsin: Would the Real Structural Intermediates Please Stand up?Biochimica Biophysica Acta-General Subj.1850, 536–553. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.05.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 901

  Wietek J. Beltramo R. Scanziani M. Hegemann P. Oertner T. G. Wiegert J. S. (2015). An Improved Chloride-Conducting Channelrhodopsin for Light-Induced Inhibition of Neuronal Activity In Vivo. Sci. Rep.5, 14807. 10.1038/srep14807

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 902

  Wijffels R. H. Kruse O. Hellingwerf K. J. (2013). Potential of Industrial Biotechnology with Cyanobacteria and Eukaryotic Microalgae. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.24, 405–413. 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.04.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 903

  Williams R. H. Tsunematsu T. Thomas A. M. Bogyo K. Yamanaka A. Kilduff T. S. (2019). Transgenic Archaerhodopsin-3 Expression in Hypocretin/Orexin Neurons Engenders Cellular Dysfunction and Features of Type 2 Narcolepsy. J. Neurosci.39, 9435–9452. 10.1523/jneurosci.0311-19.2019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 904

  Wright P. Rodgers J. Wynne J. Bishop P. N. Lucas R. J. Milosavljevic N. (2021). Viral Transduction of Human Rod Opsin or Channelrhodopsin Variants to Mouse on Bipolar Cells Does Not Impact Retinal Anatomy or Cause Measurable Death in the Targeted Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 13111. 10.3390/ijms222313111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 905

  Wright W. Gajjeraman S. Batabyal S. Pradhan S. Bhattacharya S. Mahapatra V. et al (2017). Restoring Vision in Mice with Retinal Degeneration Using Multicharacteristic Opsin. Neurophotonics4, 041505. 10.1117/1.nph.4.4.049801

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 906

  Xu C. Wang R. X. Yang Y. F. Xu T. Y. Li Y. Xu J. et al (2020). Expression of OPN3 in Lung Adenocarcinoma Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Tumor Metastasis. Thorac. Cancer11, 286–294. 10.1111/1759-7714.13254

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 907

  Xu Y. X. Peng L. X. Wang S. C. Wang A. Q. Ma R. R. Zhou Y. et al (2018). Hybrid Indicators for Fast and Sensitive Voltage Imaging. Angew. Chemie-International Ed.57, 3949–3953. 10.1002/anie.201712614

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 908

  Yaguchi M. Jia X. Schlesinger R. Jiang X. Ataka K. Heberle J. (2022). Near-Infrared Activation of Sensory Rhodopsin II Mediated by NIR-To-Blue Upconversion Nanoparticles. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 782688. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.782688

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 909

  Yalouz S. Senjean B. Günther J. Buda F. O'brien T. E. Visscher L. (2021). A State-Averaged Orbital-Optimized Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithm for a Democratic Description of Ground and Excited States. Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 024004. 10.1088/2058-9565/abd334

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 910

  Yamashita T. Ohuchi H. Tomonari S. Ikeda K. Sakai K. Shichida Y. (2010). Opn5 Is a UV-Sensitive Bistable Pigment that Couples with Gi Subtype of G Protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.107, 22084–22089. 10.1073/pnas.1012498107

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 911

  Yamashita T. Ono K. Ohuchi H. Yumoto A. Gotoh H. Tomonari S. et al (2014). Evolution of Mammalian Opn5 as a Specialized UV-Absorbing Pigment by a Single Amino Acid Mutation. J. Biol. Chem.289, 3991–4000. 10.1074/jbc.m113.514075

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 912

  Yamashita T. (2020). Unexpected Molecular Diversity of Vertebrate Nonvisual Opsin Opn5. Biophys. Rev.12, 333–338. 10.1007/s12551-020-00654-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 913

  Yan E. C. Y. Ganim Z. Kazmi M. A. Chang B. S. W. Sakmar T. P. Mathies R. A. (2004). Resonance Raman Analysis of the Mechanism of Energy Storage and Chromophore Distortion in the Primary Visual Photoproduct. Biochemistry43, 10867–10876. 10.1021/bi0400148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 914

  Yang X. Manathunga M. Gozem S. Léonard J. Andruniów T. Olivucci M. (2022). Quantum-classical Simulations of Rhodopsin Reveal Excited-State Population Splitting and its Effects on Quantum Efficiency. Nat. Chem.14, 441. 10.1038/s41557-022-00892-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 915

  Yasuda S. I. Akiyama T. Kojima K. Ueta T. Hayashi T. Ogasawara S. et al (2022). Development of an Outward Proton Pumping Rhodopsin with a New Record in Thermostability by Means of Amino Acid Mutations. J. Phys. Chem. B126, 1004. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c08684

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 916

  Ye S. X. Huber T. Vogel R. Sakmar T. P. (2009). FTIR Analysis of GPCR Activation Using Azido Probes. Nat. Chem. Biol.5, 397–399. 10.1038/nchembio.167

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 917

  Ye S. X. Zaitseva E. Caltabiano G. Schertler G. F. X. Sakmar T. P. Deupi X. et al (2010). Tracking G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Activation Using Genetically Encoded Infrared Probes. Nature464, 1386–1U14. 10.1038/nature08948

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 918

  Yee D. C. Shlykov M. A. Västermark A. Reddy V. S. Arora S. Sun E. I. et al (2013). The Transporter-Opsin-G Protein-Coupled Receptor (TOG) Superfamily. FEBS J.280, 5780–5800. 10.1111/febs.12499

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 919

  Yeh V. Lee T.-Y. Chen C.-W. Kuo P.-C. Shiue J. Chu L.-K. et al (2018). Highly Efficient Transfer of 7TM Membrane Protein from Native Membrane to Covalently Circularized Nanodisc. Sci. Rep.8, 13501. 10.1038/s41598-018-31925-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 920

  Yi A. Li H. Mamaeva N. De Cordoba R. E. F. Lugtenburg J. DeGrip W. J. et al (2017). Structural Changes in an Anion Channelrhodopsin: Formation of the K and L Intermediates at 80 K. Biochemistry56, 2197–2208. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 921

  Yi A. Mamaeva N. Li H. Spudich J. L. Rothschild K. J. (2016). Resonance Raman Study of an Anion Channelrhodopsin: Effects of Mutations Near the Retinylidene Schiff Base. Biochemistry55, 2371–2380. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00104

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 922

  Yizhar O. Fenno L. E. Davidson T. J. Mogri M. Deisseroth K. (2011). Optogenetics in Neural Systems. Neuron71, 9–34. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 923

  Yokoyama S. (1995). Amino Acid Replacements and Wavelength Absorption of Visual Pigments in Vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Evol.12, 53–61. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040190

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 924

  Yokoyama S. (2000). Molecular Evolution of Vertebrate Visual Pigments. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.19, 385–419. 10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00002-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 925

  Yokoyama S. Yokoyama R. (2000). “Comparative Molecular Biology of Visual Pigments,” in Molecular Mechanisms in Visual Transduction. Editors StavengaD. G.DeGripW. J.PughJr.E. N. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Pub.), 257–296. 10.1016/s1383-8121(00)80009-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 926

  Yoshida K. Yamashita T. Sasaki K. Inoue K. Shichida Y. Kandori H. (2017). Chimeric Microbial Rhodopsins for Optical Actvation of Gs-Proteins. Biophysics physicobiology14, 183–190. 10.2142/biophysico.14.0_183

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 927

  Yoshizawa T. Kandori H. (1991a). Primary Photochemical Events in the Rhodopsin Molecule. Prog. Retin. Res.11, 33–55. 10.1016/0278-4327(91)90023-u

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 928

  Yoshizawa T. Kuwata O. (1991b). Iodopsin, a Red-Sensitive Cone Visual Pigment in the Chicken Retina. Photochem. Photobiol.54, 1061–1070. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb02130.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 929

  Yoshizawa T. (1984). Photophysiological Functions of Visual Pigments. Adv. Biophysics17, 5–67. 10.1016/0065-227x(84)90024-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 930

  Yoshizawa T. Wald G. (1967). Photochemistry of Iodopsin. Nature214, 566–571. 10.1038/214566a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 931

  Yoshizawa T. Wald G. (1963). Pre-lumirhodopsin and the Bleaching of Visual Pigments. Nature197, 1279–1286. 10.1038/1971279a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 932

  Young R. W. (1976). Visual Cells and the Concept of Renewal. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.15, 700–725.

  • Google Scholar

• 933

  Yu H. Siewny M. G. W. Edwards D. T. Sanders A. W. Perkins T. T. (2017). Hidden Dynamics in the Unfolding of Individual Bacteriorhodopsin Proteins. Science355, 945–949. 10.1126/science.aah7124

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 934

  Yu N. Huang L. Zhou Y. B. Xue T. Chen Z. G. Han G. (2019). Near-Infrared-Light Activatable Nanoparticles for Deep-Tissue-Penetrating Wireless Optogenetics. Adv. Healthc. Mater.8, 1801132. 10.1002/adhm.201801132

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 935

  Yu S. M. Mcquade D. T. Quinn M. A. Hackenberger C. P. R. Krebs M. P. Polans A. S. et al (2000). An Improved Tripod Amphiphile for Membrane Protein Solubilization. Protein Sci.9, 2518–2527. 10.1110/ps.9.12.2518

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 936

  Yun J.-H. Li X. X. Park J.-H. Wang Y. Ohki M. Jin Z. Y. et al (2019). Non-cryogenic Structure of a Chloride Pump Provides Crucial Clues to Temperature-dependent Channel Transport Efficiency. J. Biol. Chem.294, 794–804. 10.1074/jbc.ra118.004038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 937

  Yun J.-H. Li X. X. Yue J. N. Park J.-H. Jin Z. Y. Li C. F. et al (2021). Early-stage Dynamics of Chloride Ion-Pumping Rhodopsin Revealed by a Femtosecond X-Ray Laser. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118, 2020486118. 10.1073/pnas.2020486118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 938

  Yun J.-H. Ohki M. Park J.-H. Ishimoto N. Sato-Tomita A. Lee W. et al (2020). Pumping Mechanism of NM-R3, a Light-Driven Bacterial Chloride Importer in the Rhodopsin Family. Sci. Adv.6, eaay204. 10.1126/sciadv.aay2042

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 939

  Zabelskii D. Alekseev A. Kovalev K. Rankovic V. Balandin T. Soloviov D. et al (2020). Viral Rhodopsins 1 Are an Unique Family of Light-Gated Cation Channels. Nat. Commun.11, 5707. 10.1038/s41467-020-19457-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 940

  Zabelskii D. Dmitrieva N. Volkov O. Shevchenko V. Kovalev K. Balandin T. et al (2021). Structure-based Insights into Evolution of Rhodopsins. Commun. Biol.4, 821. 10.1038/s42003-021-02326-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 941

  Zhang J. Y. Choi E. H. Tworak A. Salom D. Leinonen H. Sander C. L. et al (2019). Photic Generation of 11-Cis-Retinal in Bovine Retinal Pigment Epithelium. J. Biol. Chem.294, 19137–19154. 10.1074/jbc.ra119.011169

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 942

  Zhang L. Salom D. He J. H. Okun A. Ballesteros J. Palczewski K. et al (2005). Expression of Functional G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Photoreceptors of Transgenic Xenopus laevis. Biochemistry44, 14509–14518. 10.1021/bi051386z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 943

  Zhang L. Wang K. Ning S. Pedersen P. A. Duelli A. S. Gourdon P. E. (2022). Isolation and Crystallization of the D156C Form of Optogenetic ChR2. Cells11, 895. 10.3390/cells11050895

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 944

  Zhang M. Gui M. Wang Z.-F. Gorgulla C. Yu J. J. Wu H. et al (2021a). Cryo-EM Structure of an Activated GPCR-G Protein Complex in Lipid Nanodiscs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.28, 258–267. 10.1038/s41594-020-00554-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 945

  Zhang S. S. Zheng S. N. Sun J. H. Zeng X. X. Duan Y. K. Luan G. D. et al (2021). Rapidly Improving High Light and High Temperature Tolerances of Cyanobacterial Cell Factories through the Convenient Introduction of an AtpA-C252f Mutation. Front. Microbiol.12, 647164. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.647164

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 946

  Zhang T. Cao L.-H. Kumar S. Enemchukwu N. O. Zhang N. Lambert A. et al (2016). Dimerization of Visual Pigments In Vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113, 9093–9098. 10.1073/pnas.1609018113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 947

  Zhang X. M. Yokoyama T. Sakamoto M. (2021b). Imaging Voltage with Microbial Rhodopsins. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 738829. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.738829

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 948

  Zhang Y. Iwasa T. Tsuda M. Kobata A. Takasaki S. (1997). A Novel Monoantennary Complex-type Sugar Chain Found in octopus Rhodopsin: Occurrence of the Galβ1->3Fuc Group Linked to the Proxiranal N-Acetylglucosamine Residue of the Trimannosyl Core. Glycobiology7, 1153–1158. 10.1093/glycob/7.8.1153

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 949

  Zhao D. Y. Pöge M. Morizumi T. Gulati S. Van Eps N. Zhang J. Y. et al (2019). Cryo-EM Structure of the Native Rhodopsin Dimer in Nanodiscs. J. Biol. Chem.294, 14215–14230. 10.1074/jbc.ra119.010089

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 950

  Zhao Z. L. Wang P. Xu X. L. Sheves M. Jin Y. D. (2015). Bacteriorhodopsin/Ag Nanoparticle-Based Hybrid Nano-Bio Electrocatalyst for Efficient and Robust H₂ Evolution from Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 2840–2843. 10.1021/jacs.5b00200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 951

  Zhou H.-X. Cross T. A. (2013). Influences of Membrane Mimetic Environments on Membrane Protein Structures. Annu. Rev. Biophysics42, 361–392. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130326

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 952

  Zhou Y. Ding M. Q. Duan X. D. Konrad K. R. Nagel G. Gao S. Q. (2021). Extending the Anion Channelrhodopsin-Based Toolbox for Plant Optogenetics. Membranes11, 287–281212. 10.3390/membranes11040287

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 953

  Zou L. Tian H. H. Guan S. L. Ding J. F. Gao L. Wang J. F. et al (2021). Self-assembled Multifunctional Neural Probes for Precise Integration of Optogenetics and Electrophysiology. Nat. Commun.12, 5871–58715879. 10.1038/s41467-021-26168-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 954

  Zundel G. (1988). “Hydrogen-bond Systems as Proton Wires Formed by Side Chains of Proteins and by Side Chains and Phosphates,” in Transport through Membranes: Carriers, Channels and Pumps. Editor PullmanA. (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 409–420. 10.1007/978-94-009-3075-9_27

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar