CORRECTION article

Front. Earth Sci., 23 May 2023

Sec. Structural Geology and Tectonics

Volume 11 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1201571

Corrigendum: Diagenesis of the first member of Canglangpu formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in northern part of the central Sichuan Basin and its influence on porosity

  • BZ

    Bing Zou 1,2

  • HQ

    Haizhou Qu 1,2*

  • RZ

    Rongrong Zhao 3

  • LZ

    Lianjin Zhang 4

  • YZ

    Yu Zhang 3

  • ZM

    Zike Ma 4

  • XZ

    Xingyu Zhang 1

  • QH

    Qinyang Huang 1,2

  • QM

    Qianwen Mo 3

  • HA

    Hongyi An 3

  • YP

    Yu Pei 5

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Development Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China

  • 2. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China

  • 3. Exploration department of Petrochina Southwest Oil and Gasfield Company, Chengdu, China

  • 4. Central Sichuan Oil and Gas Mine of PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Suining, China

  • 5. Geological Exploration & Development Research Institute, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Chengdu, China

Article metrics

View details

658

Views

340

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error in the article title. Instead of “Diagenesis of the first member of Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Terreneuvian in northern part of the central Sichuan Basin and its influence on porosity”, it should be “Diagenesis of the first member of Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in northern part of the central Sichuan Basin and its influence on porosity”.

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1 as published. In the picture, the age of the strata is incorrect. The corrected Figure 1 and its caption appear below.

FIGURE 1

In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. The stratigraphic age in the table name is incorrect. The corrected Table 2 and its caption appear below.

TABLE 2

Sample NoLithologyIsotope
δ13CV-PDBδ18OV-PDB
70-6960mPowder crystal dolomite−2.4−7.7
71-6961mPowder crystal dolomite−0.7−5.9
72-6962mPowder crystal dolomite−1−6.3
73-6963mPowder crystal dolomite−3.1−9.3
74-6964mPowder crystal dolomite−1.6−6.3
75-6965mPowder crystal dolomite−1.3−5.9
76-6966mPowder crystal dolomite−3.4−9.3
77-6967mMudstone−2.5−8.8
78-6968mOolitic dolomite−2.9−8.9
79-6969mCalcareous mudstone−0.7−6.5
80-6970mPowder crystal dolomite−1.1−7.1
81-6971mPowder crystal dolomite−0.6−6.9
82-6972mPowder crystal dolomite−0.4−6.2
83-6973mArgillaceous dolomite−0.8−6.9
85-6975mPowder crystal dolomite−0.9−7.1
86-6976mPowder crystal dolomite−1.4−7.1
87-6977mArgillaceous dolomite−0.7−-7.2
88-6978mArgillaceous dolomite−1.3−7.8
89-6979mArgillaceous dolomite−0.9−7.5
90-6980mArgillaceous dolomite−1−8.1
91-6981mPowder crystal dolomite−0.8−7.3
93-6983mOolitic dolomite−0.9−7.6
94-6984mOolitic dolomite−0.8−7.4
1-6985mOolitic dolomite−0.6−6.9
3-6987mOolitic dolomite−0.6−7
4-6988mOolitic dolomite−0.8−7
5-6989mOolitic dolomite−0.8−7.3
6-6990mOolitic dolomite−1.6−8.6
7-6991mOolitic dolomite−1.8−7.7
8-6992mOolitic dolomite−1.1−7.4
10-6994mCalcareous mudstone−1.9−9.6
11-6995mCalcareous mudstone−2−9.5
12-6996mArgillaceous limestone−1.8−9.9
13-6997mArgillaceous limestone−0.9−8.5
17-7001mOolitic limestone−1.7−9.7
18-7002mOolitic limestone−1.9−9.1
19-7003mOolitic limestone−1.5−8.4
20-7004mOolitic limestone−2.1−9.8
21-7005mOolitic limestone−1.5−8.9
23-7007mOolitic limestone−1.3−9.2
24-7008mOolitic limestone−1.4−9.5
25-7009mOolitic limestone−1.2−10
38-7022mOolitic limestone−0.9−10
40-7024mOolitic limestone−1.4−9.2
41-7025mSandy limestone−1.3−8.4
42-7026mSandy limestone−1.5−9.3
43-7027mSandy limestone−1.5−8.2
44-7028mSandy limestone−2.1−9
46-7030mSandy limestone−1.6−8.8
48-7032mSandy limestone−2.1−9.2
50-7034mSandy limestone−1.4−9
52-7036mSandy limestone−2.1−9.5
53-7037mOolitic limestone−1.5−8.7
55-7039mOolitic limestone−2.1−10

Contents of carbon and oxygen isotopes in the first member of Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in well JT1, central Sichuan Basin (Ma at el., 2022).

In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. The stratigraphic age in the table name is incorrect. The corrected Table 3 and its caption appear below.

TABLE 3

Sample NoPaleo-salinity index ZUncorrected paleo-salinity S/‰Corrected paleo-salinity S/‰Paleo-water temperature/°C
70-6960m11927.134.118.9
71-6961m12328.935.911.6
72-6962m12228.535.513.1
73-6963m11625.532.526.2
74-6964m12128.535.513.1
75-6965m12228.935.911.6
76-6966m11625.532.526.2
77-6967m118263323.9
78-6968m11725.932.924.3
79-6969m12328.335.313.9
80-6970m12227.734.716.4
81-6971m12327.934.915.6
82-6972m12328.635.612.8
83-6973m12227.934.915.6
85-6975m12227.734.716.4
86-6976m12127.734.716.4
87-6977m12227.634.616.8
88-6978m121273419.4
89-6979m12227.334.318.1
90-6980m12126.733.720.7
91-6981m12227.534.517.2
93-6983m12227.234.218.5
94-6984m12227.434.417.7
1-6985m12327.934.915.6
3-6987m12327.834.816
4-6988m12227.834.816
5-6989m12227.534.517.2
6-6990m12026.233.222.9
7-6991m12027.134.118.9
8-6992m12127.434.417.7
10-6994m11925.232.227.6
11-6995m11825.332.327.2
12-6996m11924.931.929.1
13-6997m12126.333.322.5
17-7001m11925.132.128.1
18-7002m11925.732.725.3
19-7003m12026.433.422
20-7004m118253228.6
21-7005m12025.932.924.3
23-7007m12025.632.625.7
24-7008m12025.332.327.2
25-7009m12024.831.829.6
38-7022m12024.831.829.6
40-7024m12025.632.625.7
41-7025m12026.433.422
42-7026m12025.532.526.2
43-7027m12026.633.621.1
44-7028m11925.832.824.8
46-7030m120263323.9
48-7032m11825.632.625.7
50-7034m12025.832.824.8
52-7036m11825.332.327.2
53-7037m12026.133.123.4
55-7039m11824.831.829.6

Date of paleotemperature and paleo-salinity of the first member of Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 from Well JT1 in central Sichuan Basin (Ma at el., 2022).

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 7 as published. In the picture, the age of the strata is incorrect. The corrected Figure 7 and its caption appear below.

FIGURE 7

In the published article, there was an error. The stratigraphic age is incorrectly divided. A correction has been made to the Abstract, paragraph 1. The corrected sentence appears below:

“In this paper, taking the first Member of the Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in the northern central Sichuan Basin as an example.”

A correction has been made to the keywords. The corrected keywords appear below:

“diagenesis, Series 2, Cambrian, the first member of Canglangpu Formation, northern part of the Central Sichuan Basin”

A correction has been made to the Introduction, paragraph 1. The corrected sentence appears below:

“The Central Sichuan Paleo-uplift controls the process of hydrocarbon accumulation in the Sinian-Cambrian Series 2 in the Sichuan Basin. At present, the exploration horizons in this area are mainly concentrated in the Sinian Dengying Formation and the Cambrian Series 2 Longwangmiao Formation, and there are few studies on other horizons.”

A correction has been made to the Conclusion, paragraph 1. The corrected sentence appears below:

“In this paper, taking the Cang 1 Member of the Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in the north part of the central Sichuan Basin as an example.”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

diagenesis, Series 2, Cambrian, the first member of Canglangpu formation, northern part of the central Sichuan Basin

Citation

Zou B, Qu H, Zhao R, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Ma Z, Zhang X, Huang Q, Mo Q, An H and Pei Y (2023) Corrigendum: Diagenesis of the first member of Canglangpu formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in northern part of the central Sichuan Basin and its influence on porosity. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1201571. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1201571

Received

06 April 2023

Accepted

16 May 2023

Published

23 May 2023

Volume

11 - 2023

Edited and reviewed by

Derek Keir, University of Southampton, United Kingdom

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Haizhou Qu,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics