In the published article, there was an error in the article title. Instead of “Diagenesis of the first member of Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Terreneuvian in northern part of the central Sichuan Basin and its influence on porosity”, it should be “Diagenesis of the first member of Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in northern part of the central Sichuan Basin and its influence on porosity”.
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1 as published. In the picture, the age of the strata is incorrect. The corrected Figure 1 and its caption appear below.
FIGURE 1
In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. The stratigraphic age in the table name is incorrect. The corrected Table 2 and its caption appear below.
TABLE 2
| Sample No | Lithology | Isotope | |
|---|---|---|---|
| δ13CV-PDB | δ18OV-PDB | ||
| 70-6960m | Powder crystal dolomite | −2.4 | −7.7 |
| 71-6961m | Powder crystal dolomite | −0.7 | −5.9 |
| 72-6962m | Powder crystal dolomite | −1 | −6.3 |
| 73-6963m | Powder crystal dolomite | −3.1 | −9.3 |
| 74-6964m | Powder crystal dolomite | −1.6 | −6.3 |
| 75-6965m | Powder crystal dolomite | −1.3 | −5.9 |
| 76-6966m | Powder crystal dolomite | −3.4 | −9.3 |
| 77-6967m | Mudstone | −2.5 | −8.8 |
| 78-6968m | Oolitic dolomite | −2.9 | −8.9 |
| 79-6969m | Calcareous mudstone | −0.7 | −6.5 |
| 80-6970m | Powder crystal dolomite | −1.1 | −7.1 |
| 81-6971m | Powder crystal dolomite | −0.6 | −6.9 |
| 82-6972m | Powder crystal dolomite | −0.4 | −6.2 |
| 83-6973m | Argillaceous dolomite | −0.8 | −6.9 |
| 85-6975m | Powder crystal dolomite | −0.9 | −7.1 |
| 86-6976m | Powder crystal dolomite | −1.4 | −7.1 |
| 87-6977m | Argillaceous dolomite | −0.7 | −-7.2 |
| 88-6978m | Argillaceous dolomite | −1.3 | −7.8 |
| 89-6979m | Argillaceous dolomite | −0.9 | −7.5 |
| 90-6980m | Argillaceous dolomite | −1 | −8.1 |
| 91-6981m | Powder crystal dolomite | −0.8 | −7.3 |
| 93-6983m | Oolitic dolomite | −0.9 | −7.6 |
| 94-6984m | Oolitic dolomite | −0.8 | −7.4 |
| 1-6985m | Oolitic dolomite | −0.6 | −6.9 |
| 3-6987m | Oolitic dolomite | −0.6 | −7 |
| 4-6988m | Oolitic dolomite | −0.8 | −7 |
| 5-6989m | Oolitic dolomite | −0.8 | −7.3 |
| 6-6990m | Oolitic dolomite | −1.6 | −8.6 |
| 7-6991m | Oolitic dolomite | −1.8 | −7.7 |
| 8-6992m | Oolitic dolomite | −1.1 | −7.4 |
| 10-6994m | Calcareous mudstone | −1.9 | −9.6 |
| 11-6995m | Calcareous mudstone | −2 | −9.5 |
| 12-6996m | Argillaceous limestone | −1.8 | −9.9 |
| 13-6997m | Argillaceous limestone | −0.9 | −8.5 |
| 17-7001m | Oolitic limestone | −1.7 | −9.7 |
| 18-7002m | Oolitic limestone | −1.9 | −9.1 |
| 19-7003m | Oolitic limestone | −1.5 | −8.4 |
| 20-7004m | Oolitic limestone | −2.1 | −9.8 |
| 21-7005m | Oolitic limestone | −1.5 | −8.9 |
| 23-7007m | Oolitic limestone | −1.3 | −9.2 |
| 24-7008m | Oolitic limestone | −1.4 | −9.5 |
| 25-7009m | Oolitic limestone | −1.2 | −10 |
| 38-7022m | Oolitic limestone | −0.9 | −10 |
| 40-7024m | Oolitic limestone | −1.4 | −9.2 |
| 41-7025m | Sandy limestone | −1.3 | −8.4 |
| 42-7026m | Sandy limestone | −1.5 | −9.3 |
| 43-7027m | Sandy limestone | −1.5 | −8.2 |
| 44-7028m | Sandy limestone | −2.1 | −9 |
| 46-7030m | Sandy limestone | −1.6 | −8.8 |
| 48-7032m | Sandy limestone | −2.1 | −9.2 |
| 50-7034m | Sandy limestone | −1.4 | −9 |
| 52-7036m | Sandy limestone | −2.1 | −9.5 |
| 53-7037m | Oolitic limestone | −1.5 | −8.7 |
| 55-7039m | Oolitic limestone | −2.1 | −10 |
Contents of carbon and oxygen isotopes in the first member of Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in well JT1, central Sichuan Basin (Ma at el., 2022).
In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. The stratigraphic age in the table name is incorrect. The corrected Table 3 and its caption appear below.
TABLE 3
| Sample No | Paleo-salinity index Z | Uncorrected paleo-salinity S/‰ | Corrected paleo-salinity S/‰ | Paleo-water temperature/°C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70-6960m | 119 | 27.1 | 34.1 | 18.9 |
| 71-6961m | 123 | 28.9 | 35.9 | 11.6 |
| 72-6962m | 122 | 28.5 | 35.5 | 13.1 |
| 73-6963m | 116 | 25.5 | 32.5 | 26.2 |
| 74-6964m | 121 | 28.5 | 35.5 | 13.1 |
| 75-6965m | 122 | 28.9 | 35.9 | 11.6 |
| 76-6966m | 116 | 25.5 | 32.5 | 26.2 |
| 77-6967m | 118 | 26 | 33 | 23.9 |
| 78-6968m | 117 | 25.9 | 32.9 | 24.3 |
| 79-6969m | 123 | 28.3 | 35.3 | 13.9 |
| 80-6970m | 122 | 27.7 | 34.7 | 16.4 |
| 81-6971m | 123 | 27.9 | 34.9 | 15.6 |
| 82-6972m | 123 | 28.6 | 35.6 | 12.8 |
| 83-6973m | 122 | 27.9 | 34.9 | 15.6 |
| 85-6975m | 122 | 27.7 | 34.7 | 16.4 |
| 86-6976m | 121 | 27.7 | 34.7 | 16.4 |
| 87-6977m | 122 | 27.6 | 34.6 | 16.8 |
| 88-6978m | 121 | 27 | 34 | 19.4 |
| 89-6979m | 122 | 27.3 | 34.3 | 18.1 |
| 90-6980m | 121 | 26.7 | 33.7 | 20.7 |
| 91-6981m | 122 | 27.5 | 34.5 | 17.2 |
| 93-6983m | 122 | 27.2 | 34.2 | 18.5 |
| 94-6984m | 122 | 27.4 | 34.4 | 17.7 |
| 1-6985m | 123 | 27.9 | 34.9 | 15.6 |
| 3-6987m | 123 | 27.8 | 34.8 | 16 |
| 4-6988m | 122 | 27.8 | 34.8 | 16 |
| 5-6989m | 122 | 27.5 | 34.5 | 17.2 |
| 6-6990m | 120 | 26.2 | 33.2 | 22.9 |
| 7-6991m | 120 | 27.1 | 34.1 | 18.9 |
| 8-6992m | 121 | 27.4 | 34.4 | 17.7 |
| 10-6994m | 119 | 25.2 | 32.2 | 27.6 |
| 11-6995m | 118 | 25.3 | 32.3 | 27.2 |
| 12-6996m | 119 | 24.9 | 31.9 | 29.1 |
| 13-6997m | 121 | 26.3 | 33.3 | 22.5 |
| 17-7001m | 119 | 25.1 | 32.1 | 28.1 |
| 18-7002m | 119 | 25.7 | 32.7 | 25.3 |
| 19-7003m | 120 | 26.4 | 33.4 | 22 |
| 20-7004m | 118 | 25 | 32 | 28.6 |
| 21-7005m | 120 | 25.9 | 32.9 | 24.3 |
| 23-7007m | 120 | 25.6 | 32.6 | 25.7 |
| 24-7008m | 120 | 25.3 | 32.3 | 27.2 |
| 25-7009m | 120 | 24.8 | 31.8 | 29.6 |
| 38-7022m | 120 | 24.8 | 31.8 | 29.6 |
| 40-7024m | 120 | 25.6 | 32.6 | 25.7 |
| 41-7025m | 120 | 26.4 | 33.4 | 22 |
| 42-7026m | 120 | 25.5 | 32.5 | 26.2 |
| 43-7027m | 120 | 26.6 | 33.6 | 21.1 |
| 44-7028m | 119 | 25.8 | 32.8 | 24.8 |
| 46-7030m | 120 | 26 | 33 | 23.9 |
| 48-7032m | 118 | 25.6 | 32.6 | 25.7 |
| 50-7034m | 120 | 25.8 | 32.8 | 24.8 |
| 52-7036m | 118 | 25.3 | 32.3 | 27.2 |
| 53-7037m | 120 | 26.1 | 33.1 | 23.4 |
| 55-7039m | 118 | 24.8 | 31.8 | 29.6 |
Date of paleotemperature and paleo-salinity of the first member of Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 from Well JT1 in central Sichuan Basin (Ma at el., 2022).
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 7 as published. In the picture, the age of the strata is incorrect. The corrected Figure 7 and its caption appear below.
FIGURE 7
In the published article, there was an error. The stratigraphic age is incorrectly divided. A correction has been made to the Abstract, paragraph 1. The corrected sentence appears below:
“In this paper, taking the first Member of the Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in the northern central Sichuan Basin as an example.”
A correction has been made to the keywords. The corrected keywords appear below:
“diagenesis, Series 2, Cambrian, the first member of Canglangpu Formation, northern part of the Central Sichuan Basin”
A correction has been made to the Introduction, paragraph 1. The corrected sentence appears below:
“The Central Sichuan Paleo-uplift controls the process of hydrocarbon accumulation in the Sinian-Cambrian Series 2 in the Sichuan Basin. At present, the exploration horizons in this area are mainly concentrated in the Sinian Dengying Formation and the Cambrian Series 2 Longwangmiao Formation, and there are few studies on other horizons.”
A correction has been made to the Conclusion, paragraph 1. The corrected sentence appears below:
“In this paper, taking the Cang 1 Member of the Canglangpu Formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in the north part of the central Sichuan Basin as an example.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
diagenesis, Series 2, Cambrian, the first member of Canglangpu formation, northern part of the central Sichuan Basin
Citation
Zou B, Qu H, Zhao R, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Ma Z, Zhang X, Huang Q, Mo Q, An H and Pei Y (2023) Corrigendum: Diagenesis of the first member of Canglangpu formation of the Cambrian Series 2 in northern part of the central Sichuan Basin and its influence on porosity. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1201571. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1201571
Received
06 April 2023
Accepted
16 May 2023
Published
23 May 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
Derek Keir, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Zou, Qu, Zhao, Zhang, Zhang, Ma, Zhang, Huang, Mo, An and Pei.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Haizhou Qu, quhaizhou@swpu.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.