Abstract
Microalgal biofuels are currently considered to be the most promising alternative to future renewable energy source. Microalgae have great potential to produce various biofuels, including biodiesel, bioethanol, biomethane, and biohydrogen. Cultivation of biofuel-producing microalgae demands favorable environmental conditions, such as suitable light, temperature, nutrients, salinity, and pH. However, these conditions are not always compatible with the conditions beneficial to biofuel production, because biofuel-related compounds (such as lipids and carbohydrates) tend to accumulate under environmental-stress conditions of light, temperature, nutrient, and salt. This paper presents a brief overview of the effects of environmental conditions on production of microalgal biomass and biofuel, with specific emphasis on how to utilize environmental stresses to improve biofuel productivity. The potential avenues of reaping the benefits of enhanced biofuel production by environmental stresses while maintaining high yields of biomass production have been discussed.
Introduction
The rapid increase in global energy demand is driving the efforts to develop renewable energy sources. Biofuels are considered to be one of the most viable alternative sources of energy, as they are renewable, sustainable, and environment-friendly. The production of biofuels from microalgae has captured considerable interest in recent years (Schenk et al.,
2008; Wijffels and Barbosa,
2010). In this review, microalgae are defined as unicellular and simple multicellular photosynthetic microorganisms, which include eukaryotic microalgae and cyanobacteria. Several attractive characters make microalgae the most hopeful feedstock for biofuel generation (Hu et al.,
2008; Li et al.,
2008b):
- (1)
rapid growth, which provides high biomass productivity and reduces the time for development of such biofuel-producing systems;
- (2)
high amount of lipids, which can be used to produce biodiesel (Chisti, 2007; Rodolfi et al., 2009; Scott et al., 2010);
- (3)
the tolerance to marginal lands, which avoids competing with agricultural lands (Costa and de Morais, 2011; Day et al., 2011; Quintana et al., 2011);
- (4)
greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide) sequestration capacity, which can mitigate global warming impacts (Ono and Cuello, 2007; Packer, 2009);
- (5)
the ability to utilize nutrients (such as nitrogen and phosphorus) from polluted municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastewater, which provides economical and environmental benefits of wastewater bioremediation (Hall et al., 1995; Mulbry et al., 2008; de Godos et al., 2009; Markou and Georgakakis, 2011; Rawat et al., 2011);
- (6)
the potential of producing various valuable co-products for commercial application (Radmer and Parker, 1994; Olaizola, 2003; Gavrilescu and Chisti, 2005; Singh et al., 2005; Walker et al., 2005; Spolaore et al., 2006; Raja et al., 2008), which also improves the economics of microalgal biofuel production.
Microalgae are able to produce diverse forms of biofuels including: microalgal lipid-derived biodiesel (Schenk et al., 2008; Scott et al., 2010), bioethanol by fermentation of carbohydrate (Deng and Coema, 1999; Dismukes et al., 2008), biomethane through anaerobic digestion (Sialve et al., 2009; Alzate et al., 2012), and biohydrogen from photosynthesis or fermentation (Benemann, 2000; Kapdan and Kargi, 2006; Hemschemeier et al., 2009). Moreover, the whole microalgae can be converted into bio-oil (via hydrothermal liquefaction and pyrolysis), hydrochar (via hydrothermal carbonization), and syngas (via gasification) (Miao et al., 2004; Amin, 2009; Heilmann et al., 2010; Jena and Das, 2011; Jena et al., 2011; Markou et al., 2012a; Broch et al., 2014).
Although microalgal biofuels hold great promise, considerable challenges exist for their commercialization. Further research efforts required to make microalgal biofuels cost-effective and sustainable include: selecting and bioengineering microalgal strains for the best biofuel producers; optimizing culturing conditions for microalgal biomass and biofuel production; developing bioreactors suitable for large-scale microalgae cultivation; improving efficiency of microalgal biomass harvesting and downstream processing, and reducing production costs and energy consumption (Greenwell et al., 2010; Scott et al., 2010; Gong and Jiang, 2011; Nigam and Singh, 2011; Singh et al., 2011a,b, 2012).
Cultivation of microalgae for biofuel production is influenced by numerous environmental factors, including physical factors, such as light and temperature and chemical factors, such as nutrients, salinity, and pH (Hu, 2004; Guschina and Harwood, 2006; Hu et al., 2008; Singh and Dhar, 2011). These environmental factors not only affect the accumulation of biomass but also influence the biochemical composition of cell, and thus the biofuel productivity.
This review highlights environmental conditions required for optimized microalgae cultivation as well as stressed conditions applied for improved microalgal biofuel production.
Environmental Factors Affecting Microalgal Biomass Accumulation
The microalgal biomass production can be highly influenced by light intensity, temperature, nutrient availability, salinity, and pH (Table 1; Figure 1), as these conditions affect profoundly photosynthesis and the biosynthesis and accumulation of biomolecules such as lipids, carbohydrates, and biohydrogen.
Table 1
| Microalgae | Biomass productivity (mg l−1 d−1) | Biochemical content (% of dry cell weight) | Environmental stresses | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before stress | After stress | Before stress | After stress | ||||
| Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis | 193 | 87 | Carbohydrate | 11 | 67 | Phosphorous limitation | Markou et al. (2012b) |
| Nannochloropsis sp. | 633 | 457 | 8 | 11 | High carbon dioxide | Hu and Gao (2003) | |
| Scenedesmus obiquus CNW-N | 441 | 841 | 16 | 38 | High light | Ho et al. (2012) | |
| 841 | 732 | 38 | 52 | Nitrogen limitation | Ho et al. (2012) | ||
| Spirulina sp. | – | – | 14 | 21 | High temperature | Ogbonda et al. (2007) | |
| Tetraselmis subcordiformis | – | – | <10 | 32 | Nitrogen limitation | Ji et al. (2011) | |
| Chaetoceros muelleri | 70 | – | Lipid | 19 | 36 | Silicon limitation | Griffiths and Harrison (2009) |
| Chlorella vulgaris | 138 | 133 | 6 | 15 | Nitrogen limitation | Converti et al. (2009) | |
| Cyclotella cryptica | – | – | 18 | 38 | Silicon limitation | Griffiths and Harrison (2009) | |
| Dunaliella tertiolecta ATCC 30929 | – | – | 60 | 70 | High salinity | Takagi et al. (2006) | |
| Nannochloropsis oculata | 127 | 73 | 8 | 14 | High temperature | Converti et al. (2009) | |
| 127 | 103 | 8 | 16 | Nitrogen limitation | Converti et al. (2009) | ||
| Nannochloropsis sp. | 633 | 457 | 7 | 9 | High carbon dioxide | Hu and Gao (2003) | |
| Nannochloropsis sp. F&M-M24 | 360 | 300 | 32 | 60 | Nitrogen limitation | Rodolfi et al. (2009) | |
| Navicula saprophila | – | – | 24 | 49 | Silicon limitation | Griffiths and Harrison (2009) | |
| Neochloris oleoabundans | 630 | 400 | 16 | 34 | Nitrogen limitation | Li et al. (2008a) | |
| Scenedesmus obiquus CNW-N | 841 | 732 | 12 | 22 | Nitrogen limitation | Ho et al. (2012) | |
| Scenedesmus sp. LX1 | 37–64 | 27 | 23–28 | 53 | Phosphorous limitation | Xin et al. (2010) | |
Impact of environmental stresses on microalgal biomass accumulation and biochemical composition for biofuels.
Figure 1
Light
Light is the basic energy source for photoautotrophic organisms, and the intensity of light is one of the key parameters affecting photosynthetic activity (Falkowski and Owens, 1980; Richardson et al., 1983; Post et al., 1985). The growth rate of the microalgae culture increases with increased light intensities, until saturating light (generally around 200–400 μE) is reached (Radakovits et al., 2010). Oversaturating light can lead to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which is harmful for microalgae cells (photoinhibition), and thereby, decrease the biomass productivity (Stanier and Cohenbazire, 1977; Goldman, 1979; Richmond, 2000).
Temperature
Although microalgae are able to survive at a variety of temperatures, optimal temperature for growth is limited to a narrow range (20–30°C) (Singh et al., 2012). Generally, in optimal temperature range, rise in temperature leads to improved microalgal biomass production. Temperatures above the optimal range cause growth declines, in severe conditions, even kill microalgae cells. However, low temperatures seem to reduce the biomass loss caused by respiration during dark periods (Weissman and Goebel, 1985; Raven and Geider, 2006; Chisti, 2007). Therefore, high biomass accumulation can be achieved by increasing the temperature to optimal in the morning (to enhance productivity during the day) and decreasing the temperature at night (to avoid biomass loss) (Hu, 2004).
Nutrients
Nutrients supplied to microalgal cultures include macronutrients (such as nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, and sulfur) and micronutrients (such as iron, zinc, copper, and cobalt). Nutrient limitation may cause morphological and physiological changes of microalgae cells, and therefore decrease the growth rates and biomass production. Nitrogen and phosphorus are the most important nutrients required for microalgae growth, and the ratio of nitrogen to phosphorus (N:P) can directly control the nutrient limitation status (Rhee, 1978; Wijffels and Barbosa, 2010). Nitrogen is involved in the biosynthesis nucleus acids, proteins, and photosynthetic pigments. Nitrogen limitation decreases the synthesis of photosynthetic proteins and pigments, therefore affects the yield of microalgal biomass (Berges et al., 1996; Saha et al., 2003; Li et al., 2008a). Phosphorus is essential in a variety of cellular metabolic processes, and phosphorus limitation affects the growth and development of microalgae (Geider and La Roche, 2002; Litchman et al., 2003; Hu, 2004). Carbon dioxide is necessary for photosynthesis, but it will become harmful if in excess. In addition, the carbon metabolic mode (autotrophic, mixotrophic, or heterotrophic) also affects the growth rates of microalgae (Chojnacka and Marquez-Rocha, 2004). Sulfur is essential for photosynthesis, protein synthesis, and lipid metabolism. It has been reported that sulfur limitation can limit cell division of microalgae (Yildiz et al., 1994; Ariño et al., 1995). Iron plays a key role in photosynthetic electron transport chain, and its limitation leads to defects in photosynthesis (van Oijen et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2008). However, excessive iron may result in oxidative damage to the cells (Fenton, 1894; Choudhary et al., 2007).
Other environmental factors
Environmental factors, such as salinity and pH are also important for microalgae biomass accumulation. Different microalgae species can tolerate different ranges of salt concentrations (Kirst, 1989). Excess salinity inhibits photosynthesis, thus reduces the yield of biomass (Vonshak and Richmond, 1981; Gilmour et al., 1984; Kirst, 1989; Endo et al., 1995; Cho et al., 2007; Rao et al., 2007). The pH range optimal for microalgal growth is narrow (for most microalgae, is between 8.2 and 8.7) and strain-specific (Pedersen and Hansen, 2003; Havlik et al., 2013). The pH in microalgal cultures rise steadily during the day as carbon dioxide is consumed through photosynthesis. It has been found that pH also impacts the availability and absorption of nutrients such as iron and carbon (Coleman and Colman, 1981; Lee and Pirt, 1984; Wu et al., 2012).
Environmental Stresses Affecting Microalgal Biofuel Productivity
The composition of microalgal biomass (such as biofuel-related lipids and carbohydrates) varies with the environmental conditions. Numerous studies have described utilizing environmental stresses (e.g., light stress, temperature stress, nutrient stress, and salt stress) to improve microalgal biofuel production (Table 1; Figure 1).
Light stress
Microalgae grown under different light conditions exhibit remarkable changes in their chemical composition. Typically, the amount of poly unsaturated fatty acids (structural lipids) increases under low light conditions, whereas high light promotes the accumulation of saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acids (storage lipids) (Spoehr and Milner, 1949; Orcutt and Patterson, 1974; Sukenik et al., 1989, 1993; Walsh et al., 1997; Khotimchenko and Yakovleva, 2005). Because saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acids are preferred sources for biodiesel, it may be feasible to use relatively high light intensities to improve biodiesel yield. It has also been reported that the content of carbohydrate in Scenedesmus obliquus CNW-N increased from 16.3 to 22.4% after exposure to high light (Ho et al., 2012).
Temperature stress
Temperature can affect the lipid content in microalgae. Several microalgae, such as Ochromonas danica and Nannochloropsis oculata, have been found to increase their lipid content (37 and 89% increase, respectively) with increasing temperature (Aaronson, 1973; Converti et al., 2009). Besides, the composition of lipid can also be altered by temperature. Similar to the impact of light on lipid composition, low temperatures tend to increase the degree of unsaturation in fatty acid, whereas high temperatures improve the saturation of fatty acids (Sato et al., 1979; Wada and Murata, 1990; Renaud et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2005). Therefore, a suitably high temperature seems to promote the production of high quantity (high total lipid yield) and high quality (high saturation degrees of fatty acids) biodiesels. Temperature also influences the level of carbohydrates in microalgae, for example, the carbohydrate content in Spirulina sp. increased by 50% when the temperature was increased from 25 to 40°C (Ogbonda et al., 2007).
Nutrient stress
When grown under nutrient-stress conditions, microalgae change their metabolic strategies and biochemical composition. Consequently, the improved production of desired biofuels can be achieved by manipulating nutrient conditions.
Nitrogen
Nitrogen is critical for protein biosynthesis. However, under nitrogen-limiting conditions, most of the carbon fixed in photosynthesis is used to synthesize lipids or carbohydrates, instead of proteins. Nitrogen is considered to be the most important nutrient affecting lipid metabolism in microalgae. It has been reported that a variety of microalgae species increase the accumulation of lipids after nitrogen deprivation. For instance, lipid content in Neochloris oleoabundans and Nannochloropsis sp. F&M-M24 increased about twofold and onefold, respectively, after nitrogen deprivation (Li et al., 2008a; Rodolfi et al., 2009). Nitrogen limitation also leads to the enhanced biosynthesis of carbohydrates in several microalgal species, such as a fourfold increase in carbohydrate content in Tetraselmis subcordiformis, and a 29% increase in carbohydrate content in S. obliquus CNW-N (Ji et al., 2011; Ho et al., 2012). Additionally, many cyanobacteria can produce hydrogen as a byproduct of nitrogen fixation when grown under nitrogen-limiting conditions (Das and Veziroglu, 2001; Dutta et al., 2005; Abed et al., 2009).
Phosphorous
Phosphorous is involved in many cellular metabolic processes. It has been found that phosphorous limitation results in increased accumulation of lipids in microalgal cells, for example, Scenedesmus sp. LX1 accumulated up to 53% lipid under phosphorus-limiting conditions, whereas it only contained 25–28% lipid under phosphorus-replete conditions (Xin et al., 2010). In addition, Markou et al. (2012b) have shown that the carbohydrate content in Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis increased from 11 to 67% after transfer to phosphorous-limiting medium.
Sulfur
Sulfur is one of the most significant nutrients that affect the biohydrogen production in microalgae. Sulfur limitation causes anaerobic environment inside microalgae cells, thus induces the activity of hydrogenase and the release of hydrogen (Dutta et al., 2005; Esquível et al., 2011). Therefore, sulfur-limiting conditions have been applied to increase hydrogen productivity in many microalgae species, such as Gloeocapsa alpicola, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlamydomonas noctigama and Chlamydomonas euyale (Antal and Lindblad, 2005; Laurinavichene et al., 2006; Skjånes et al., 2008). It has been also found that total fatty acid content in C. reinhardtii doubled after exposure to sulfur limitation (Matthew et al., 2009). Furthermore, Brányiková et al. (2011) reported that Chlorella vulgaris cells synthesized 50% more starch under sulfur-limiting conditions than under sulfur-replete conditions.
Carbon
Carbon is thought to influence the activity of nitrogenase and therefore the nitrogenase-dependent hydrogen production (Dutta et al., 2005). Moreover, different amounts and sources of carbon have been shown to affect both the content and the composition of lipids in microalgae cells. It has been reported that high concentration of carbon dioxide induced the accumulation of saturated fatty acids, whereas low concentration of carbon dioxide facilitated the production of unsaturated fatty acids (Tsuzuki et al., 1990; Riebesell et al., 2000; Hu and Gao, 2003). Certain microalgae are able to use organic carbon instead of carbon dioxide as the carbon source for heterotrophic growth. It was found that heterotrophically grown Chlorella cells synthesized about 280% more lipids and 45% more carbohydrates than did autotrophically grown cells (Miao and Wu, 2006).
Trace mineral nutrients
Trace mineral elements may affect the accumulation of lipids and carbohydrates in numerous microalgae. It has been found that the content of glucose in Agmenellum quadruplicatum increased from 5 to 45% in response to iron limitation (Hardie et al., 1983), whereas excess iron caused up to sevenfold increase in lipid content in C. vulgaris (Liu et al., 2008). It has also been reported that silicon limitation resulted in increased lipid content in many diatom species, such as 89, 110, and 104% increase in lipid content in Chaetoceros muelleri, Cyclotella cryptica, and Navicula saprophila, respectively (Griffiths and Harrison, 2009). Additionally, trace metals, such as iron, nickel, magnesium, molybdenum, and zinc are important for nitrogenase-catalyzed hydrogen production (Horner et al., 2002; Lin and Lay, 2005; Carrieri et al., 2008).
Salt stress
Salt has been shown to play an important role in the production of various biofuels. Carrieri et al. (2010) found that high salt concentration increased ethanol production by 121-fold compared to low salt concentration in the cyanobacterium A. (Spirulina) maxima. It is also known that many microalgae produce low molecular weight carbohydrates in response to salt stresses (Warr et al., 1985; Stal and Reed, 1987; Page-Sharp et al., 1998; Rao et al., 2007). Besides, salt stress is able to influence lipid content and composition in microalgae cells. It has been observed that elevated salinity increased lipid content from 60 to 70% in Dunaliella tertiolecta ATCC 30929 (Takagi et al., 2006). In addition, high salinity tends to induce the saturation of fatty acid, thus increase the productivity of biodiesels (Xu and Beardall, 1997; Chen et al., 2008).
Combination of multiple stress factors
Since the impacts of different environmental stresses on biofuel production are additive, combined application of multiple stress factors might obtain better effect on improving the yield of desired biofuel products than the application of single stress factor. Recently, more and more research has been focused on the cumulative effect of multiple environmental stresses on microalgal biofuel production. Pal et al. (2011) found that the productivity of total lipids reached to the maximum when employed high light stress and high salinity stress simultaneously to Nannochloropsis sp. cultures. Sun et al. (2014) used nitrogen starvation in conjunction with high light to achieve the maximal triacylglyceride and carbohydrate production in N. oleoabundans HK-129.
Perspectives – A Balance between Biomass Accumulation and Biofuel Production
Although applying environmental stress that can increase the production of microalgal biofuels, this is generally at the expense of decreased biomass yield. Consequently, the tradeoff between biomass accumulation and biofuel productivity is important for satisfactory biofuel production by microalgae.
In order to achieve optimum conditions for microalgal biofuel production, a two-phased cultivation method was proposed (Benemann and Oswald, 1996). In this method, the microalgae are grown under normal conditions in the first phase for biomass accumulation, followed by culturing under environmental-stress conditions in the second phase for desired biofuel production. By doing this, the microalgae can produce maximum biofuels without obvious biomass reduction. In the research performed by Rodolfi et al. (2009), a nutrient-replete first phase and a nitrogen-limiting second phase were used to increase both lipid content and areal lipid productivity in Nannochloropsis sp. F&M-M24. Dragon and co-workers used nitrogen- and iron-sufficient medium in the first phase to achieve high cell growth, then introduced nitrogen- and iron-limitation in the second phase to boost starch accumulation in C. vulgaris (Dragone et al., 2011).
Another balanced approach is using stress-tolerant microalgae strains for biofuel production. Many genes have been reported to be involved in stress responses and adaptation. It is likely that genetic manipulation of these genes might confer stress tolerance characteristics to microalgae. For example, glutathione peroxidase is an antioxidant enzyme, which plays an important role in protecting cells against oxidative damage. It has been reported that overexpression of glutathione peroxidase led to improved tolerance to high light stress, low temperature stress, and high salinity stress in transgenic plants (Takeda et al., 2003; Yoshimura et al., 2004). Another example is pfsR (photosynthesis, Fe homeostasis, and stress–response regulator) in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Inactivation of pfsR resulted in stronger iron buffering capacity, and hence, improved resistance to iron limitation in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (Jantaro et al., 2006). The photoinhibition caused by high light is always an important consideration when culturing microalgae, thus intensive efforts have been devoted to increase the tolerance of microalgae to high light-radiation. It has been shown that the Chlamydomonas mutants with reduced light-harvesting pigment or with truncated antenna size exhibited increased tolerance to high light and improved biomass productivity (Nakajima et al., 2001; Polle et al., 2002). The application of stress-tolerant strains not only makes the environmental-stress conditions suitable for both biomass accumulation and biofuels production but also prevents contamination, which reduces biomass production. The stress-tolerant microalgae strains, especially the strains thriving under reduced or limited nutrient conditions, such as the pfsR mutant, can outcompete other species, thus keeping desired microalgal culture in relatively pure conditions.
Growing microalgae under optimized stress conditions (such as a proper combination of nutrient limitation and light stress) can reduce the cultivation cost, maximize the accumulation of biofuel materials, and avoid contamination by competing out unwanted organisms, therefore offers a sustainable strategy for improving microalgal biofuel production. A comprehensive life-cycle assessment of the production processes (Singh and Olsen, 2011; Singh et al., 2011c, 2013) and appropriate policy supports, such as increasing funding for environmental-stress research and pilot studies, encouraging the utilization of environmental factors for sustainable biofuel production, promoting the development of high-efficient and cost-effective microalgae cultivation methods, and offering economic incentives (for example, tax exemptions) for microalgal biofuels to attract industry interest, will advance the key technologies in harnessing environmental stresses to promote biofuel production at commercial scale.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AaronsonS. (1973). Effect of incubation temperature on the macromolecular and lipid content of the phytoflagellate Ochromonas danica. J. Phycol.9, 111–113.10.1111/j.0022-3646.1973.00111.x
2
AbedR. M. M.DobretsovS.SudeshK. (2009). Applications of cyanobacteria in biotechnology. J. Appl. Microbiol.106, 1–12.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03918.x
3
AlzateM. E.MunozR.RogallaF.Fdz-PolancoF.Pérez-ElviraS. I. (2012). Biochemical methane potential of microalgae: influence of substrate to inoculum ratio, biomass concentration and pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol.123, 488–494.10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.113
4
AminS. (2009). Review on biofuel oil and gas production processes from microalgae. Energy Convers. Manag.50, 1834–1840.10.1016/j.enconman.2009.03.001
5
AntalT. K.LindbladP. (2005). Production of H2 by sulphur-deprived cells of the unicellular cyanobacteria Gloeocapsa alpicola and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 during dark incubation with methane or at various extracellular pH. J. Ferment. Bioeng.98, 114–120.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02431.x
6
AriñoX.Ortega-CalvoJ.Hernandez-MarineM.Saiz-JimenezC. (1995). Effect of sulfur starvation on the morphology and ultrastructure of the cyanobacterium Gloeothece sp. PCC 6909. Arch. Microbiol.163, 447–453.10.1007/BF00272134
7
BenemannJ. R. (2000). Hydrogen production by microalgae. J. Appl. Phycol.12, 291–300.10.1023/A:1008175112704
8
BenemannJ. R.OswaldW. J. (1996). Systems and Economic Analysis of Microalgae Ponds for Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Biomass (Final Report: Grant No. DEFG22 93PC93204). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh Energy Technology Centre, US Department of Energy.
9
BergesJ. A.CharleboisD. O.MauzerallD. C.FalkowskiP. G. (1996). Differential effects of nitrogen limitation on photosynthetic efficiency of photosystems I and II in microalgae. Plant Physiol.110, 689–696.10.1104/pp.110.2.689
10
BrányikováI.MaršálkováB.DouchaJ.BrányikT.BišováK.ZachlederV.et al (2011). Microalgae-novel highly efficient starch producers. Biotechnol. Bioeng.108, 766–776.10.1002/bit.23016
11
BrochA.JenaU.HoekmanS. K.LangfordJ. (2014). Analysis of solid and aqueous phase products from hydrothermal carbonization of whole and lipid-extracted algae. Energies7, 62–79.10.3390/en7010062
12
CarrieriD.AnanyevG.Garcia CostasA. M.BryantD. A.DismukesG. C. (2008). Renewable hydrogen production by cyanobacteria: nickel requirements for optimal hydrogenase activity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy33, 2014–2022.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.022
13
CarrieriD.MomotD.BrasgI. A.AnanyevG.LenzO. B.BryantD. A.et al (2010). Boosting autofermentation rates and product yields with sodium stress cycling: application to renewable fuel production by cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.76, 6455–6462.10.1128/AEM.00975-10
14
ChenG. Q.JiangY.ChenF. (2008). Salt-induced alterations in lipid composition of diatom Nitzschia laevis (Bacillariophyceae) under heterotrophic culture condition. J. Phycol.44, 1309–1314.10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00565.x
15
ChistiY. (2007). Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv.25, 294–306.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001
16
ChoS.JiS. C.HurS.BaeJ.ParkI. S.SongY. C. (2007). Optimum temperature and salinity conditions for growth of green algae Chlorella ellipsoidea and Nannochloris oculata. Fish. Sci.73, 1050–1056.10.1111/j.1444-2906.2007.01435.x
17
ChojnackaK.Marquez-RochaF. J. (2004). Kinetic and stoichiometric relationships of the energy and carbon metabolism in the culture of microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv.3, 21–34.10.3923/biotech.2004.21.34
18
ChoudharyM.JetleyU. K.KhanM. A.ZutshiS.FatmaT. (2007). Effect of heavy metal stress on proline, malondialdehyde, and superoxide dismutase activity in the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis-S5. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.66, 204–209.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.02.002
19
ColemanJ. R.ColmanB. (1981). Inorganic carbon accumulation and photosynthesis in a blue-green alga as a function of external pH. Plant Physiol.67, 917–921.10.1104/pp.67.5.917
20
ConvertiA.CasazzaA. A.OrtizE. Y.PeregoP.BorghiM. D. (2009). Effect of temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chem. Eng. Process.48, 1146–1151.10.1016/j.cep.2009.03.006
21
CostaJ. A. V.de MoraisM. G. (2011). The role of biochemical engineering in the production of biofuels from microalgae. Bioresour. Technol.102, 2–9.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.014
22
DasD.VezirogluT. N. (2001). Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy26, 13–28.10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00058-6
23
DayJ. G.SlocombeS. P.StanleyM. S. (2011). Overcoming biological constraints to enable the exploitation of microalgae for biofuels. Bioresour. Technol.109, 245–251.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.033
24
de GodosI.BlancoS.García-EncinaP. A.BecaresE.MuñozR. (2009). Long-term operation of high rate algal ponds for the bioremediation of piggery wastewaters at high loading rates. Bioresour. Technol.100, 4332–4339.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.016
25
DengM.CoemaJ. R. (1999). Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65, 523–528.
26
DismukesG. C.CarrieriD.BennetteN.AnanyevG. M.PosewitzM. C. (2008). Aquatic phototrophs: efficient alternatives to land-based crops for biofuels. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19, 235–240.10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.007
27
DragoneG.FernandesB. D.AbreuA. P.VicenteA. A.TeixeiraJ. A. (2011). Nutrient limitation as a strategy for increasing starch accumulation in microalgae. Appl. Energ.88, 3331–3335.10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.03.012
28
DuttaD.DeD.ChaudhuriS.BhattacharyaS. K. (2005). Hydrogen production by cyanobacteria. Microb. Cell Fact.4, 1–11.10.1186/1475-2859-4-36
29
EndoT.SchreiberU.AsadaK. (1995). Suppression of quantum yield of photosystem II by hyperosmotic stress in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell Physiol.36, 1253–1258.
30
EsquívelM. G.AmaroH. M.PintoT. S.FevereiroP. S.MalcataF. X. (2011). Efficient H2 production via Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Trends Biotechnol.29, 595–600.10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.06.008
31
FalkowskiP. G.OwensT. G. (1980). Light-shade adaptation: two strategies in marine phytoplankton. Plant Physiol.66, 592–595.10.1104/pp.66.4.592
32
FentonH. J. H. (1894). Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. J. Chem. Soc.65, 899–910.10.1039/CT8946500899
33
GavrilescuM.ChistiC. (2005). Biotechnology – a sustainable alternative for chemical industry. Biotechnol. Adv.23, 471–499.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.03.004
34
GeiderR. J.La RocheJ. (2002). Redfield revisited: variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis. Eur. J. Phycol.37, 1–17.10.1017/S0967026201003456
35
GilmourD. J.HipkinsM. F.BoneyA. D. (1984). The effect of osmotic and ionic stress on the primary processes of photosynthesis in Dunaliella tertiolecta. J. Exp. Bot.35, 18–27.10.1093/jxb/35.1.18
36
GoldmanJ. C. (1979). Outdoor mass algal cultures-II, photosynthetic yield limitations. Water Res.11, 119–136.10.1016/0043-1354(79)90083-6
37
GongY.JiangM. (2011). Biodiesel production with microalgae as feedstock: from strains to biodiesel. Biotechnol. Lett.33, 1269–1284.10.1007/s10529-011-0574-z
38
GreenwellH. C.LaurensL. M. L.ShieldsR. J.LovittR. W.FlynnK. J. (2010). Placing microalgae on the biofuels priority list: a review of the technological challenges. J. R. Soc. Interface7, 703–726.10.1098/rsif.2009.0322
39
GriffithsM. J.HarrisonS. T. L. (2009). Lipid productivity as a key characteristic for choosing algal species for biodiesel production. J. Appl. Phycol.21, 493–507.10.1007/s10811-008-9392-7
40
GuschinaI. A.HarwoodJ. L. (2006). Lipids and lipid metabolism in eukaryotic algae. Prog. Lipid Res.45, 160–186.10.1016/j.plipres.2006.01.001
41
HallD. O.MarkovS. A.WatanabeY.RaoK. K. (1995). The potential applications of cyanobacterial photosynthesis for clean technologies. Photosyn. Res.46, 159–167.10.1007/BF00020426
42
HardieL. P.BalkwillD. L.StevensS. E. (1983). Effects of iron starvation on the physiology of the cyanobacterium Agmenellum quadruplicatum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.45, 999–1006.
43
HavlikI.LindnerP.ScheperT.ReardonK. F. (2013). On-line monitoring of large cultivations of microalgae and cyanobacteria. Trends Biotechnol.31, 406–414.10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.005
44
HeilmannS. M.DavisH. T.JaderL. R.LefebvreP. A.SadowskyM. J.SchendelF. J.et al (2010). Hydrothermal carbonization of microalgae. Biomass Bioenergy34, 875–882.10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.032
45
HemschemeierA.MelisA.HappeT. (2009). Analytical approaches to photobiological hydrogen production in unicellular green algae. Photosyn. Res.102, 523–540.10.1007/s11120-009-9415-5
46
HoS. H.ChenC. Y.ChangJ. S. (2012). Effect of light intensity and nitrogen starvation on CO2 fixation and lipid/carbohydrate production of an indigenous microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus CNW-N. Bioresour. Technol.113, 244–252.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.133
47
HornerD. S.HeilB.HappeT.HappeT.EmbleyT. M. (2002). Iron hydrogenases – ancient enzymes in modern eukaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci.27, 148–153.10.1016/S0968-0004(01)02053-9
48
HuH.GaoK. (2003). Optimization of growth and fatty acid composition of a unicellular marine picoplankton, Nannochloropsis sp., with enriched carbon sources. Biotechnol. Lett.25, 421–425.10.1023/A:1022489108980
49
HuQ. (2004). “Environmental effects on cell composition,” in Handbook of Microalgal Culture, ed. RichmondA. (Oxford: Blackwell), 83–93.
50
HuQ.SommerfeldM.JarvisE.GhirardiM.PosewitzM.SeibertM.et al (2008). Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. Plant J.54, 621–639.10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03492.x
51
JantaroS.AliQ.LoneS.HeQ. (2006). Suppression of the lethality of high light to a quadruple HLI mutant by the inactivation of the regulatory protein PfsR in Synechocystis PCC 6803. J. Biol. Chem.281, 30865–30874.10.1074/jbc.M606252200
52
JenaU.DasK. C. (2011). Comparative evaluation of thermochemical liquefaction and pyrolysis for bio-oil production from microalgae. Energy Fuel25, 5472–5482.10.1021/ef201373m
53
JenaU.DasK. C.KastnerJ. R. (2011). Effect of operating conditions of thermochemical liquefaction on biocrude production from Spirulina platensis. Bioresour. Technol.102, 6221–6229.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.057
54
JiC.-F.YuX.-J.ChenZ.-A.XueS.LegrandJ.ZhangW. (2011). Effects of nutrient deprivation on biochemical compositions and photo-hydrogen production of Tetraselmis subcordiformis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy36, 5817–5821.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.138
55
KapdanI. K.KargiF. (2006). Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme Microb. Technol.38, 569–582.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.09.015
56
KhotimchenkoS. V.YakovlevaI. M. (2005). Lipid composition of the red alga Tichocarpus crinitus exposed to different levels of photon irradiance. Phytochemistry66, 73–79.10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.10.024
57
KirstG. O. (1989). Salinity tolerance of eukaryotic marine algae. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.40, 21–53.10.1146/annurev.pp.41.060190.000321
58
LaurinavicheneT. V.FedorovA. S.GhiradiM. L.SeibertM.TsygankovA. A. (2006). Demonstration of sustained hydrogen photoproduction by immobilized, sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy31, 659–667.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.05.002
59
LeeY. K.PirtS. J. (1984). CO2 absorption rate in an algal culture: effect of pH. J. Phycol.34, 28–32.10.1002/jctb.280340105
60
LiY.HorsmanM.WangB.WuN.LanC. Q. (2008a). Effects of nitrogen sources on cell growth and lipid accumulation of green alga Neochloris oleoabundans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.81, 629–636.10.1007/s00253-008-1681-1
61
LiY.HorsmanM.WuN.LanC. Q.Dubois-CaleroN. (2008b). Biofuels from microalgae. Biotechnol. Prog.24, 815–820.10.1021/bp070371k
62
LinC. Y.LayC. H. (2005). A nutrient formulation for fermentative hydrogen production using anaerobic sewage sludge microflora. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy30, 285–292.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.03.002
63
LitchmanE.SteinerD.BossardP. (2003). Photosynthetic and growth responses of three freshwater algae to phosphorus limitation and day length. Freshw. Biol.48, 2141–2148.10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01157.x
64
LiuX. J.JiangY.ChenF. (2005). Fatty acid profile of the edible filamentous cyanobacterium Nostoc flagelliforme at different temperatures and developmental stages in liquid suspension culture. Process Biochem.40, 371–377.10.1016/j.procbio.2004.01.018
65
LiuZ. Y.WangG. C.ZhouB. C. (2008). Effect of iron on growth and lipid accumulation in Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresour. Technol.99, 4717–4722.10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.073
66
MarkouG.AngelidakiI.GeorgakakisD. (2012a). Microalgal carbohydrates: an overview of the influencing carbohydrates production, and of main bioconversion technologies for production of biofuels. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.96, 631–645.10.1007/s00253-012-4398-0
67
MarkouG.ChatzipavlidisI.GeorgakakisD. (2012b). Carbohydrates production and bio-flocculation characteristics in cultures of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis: improvements through phosphorus limitation process. Bioenerg. Res.5, 915–925.10.1007/s12155-012-9205-3
68
MarkouG.GeorgakakisD. (2011). Cultivation of filamentous cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) in agro-industrial wastes and waste-waters: a review. Appl. Energy88, 3389–3401.10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.042
69
MatthewT.ZhouW.RupprechtJ.LimL.Thomas-HallS. R.DoebbeA.et al (2009). The metabolome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii following induction of anaerobic H2 production by sulfur depletion. J. Biol. Chem.284, 13415–13425.10.1074/jbc.M109.003541
70
MiaoX.WuQ.YangC. (2004). Fast pyrolysis of microalgae to produce renewable fuels. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis71, 855–863.10.1016/j.jaap.2003.11.004
71
MiaoX. L.WuQ. Y. (2006). Biodiesel production from heterotrophic microalgal oil. Bioresour. Technol.97, 841–846.10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.008
72
MulbryW.KondradS.PizarroC.Kebede-WestheadE. (2008). Treatment of dairy manure effluent using freshwater algae: algal productivity and recovery of manure nutrients using pilot-scale algal turf scrubbers. Bioresour. Technol.99, 8137–8142.10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.073
73
NakajimaY.TsuzukiM.UedaR. (2001). Improved productivity by reduction of the content of light-harvesting pigment in Chlamydomonas perigranulata. J. Appl. Phycol.13, 95–101.10.1023/A:1011192832502
74
NigamP. S.SinghA. (2011). Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.37, 52–68.10.1016/j.pecs.2010.01.003
75
OgbondaK. H.AminigoR. E.AbuG. O. (2007). Influence of temperature and pH on biomass production and protein biosynthesis in a putative Spirulina sp. Bioresour. Technol.98, 2207–2211.10.1016/j.biortech.2006.08.028
76
OlaizolaM. (2003). Commercial development of microalgal biotechnology: from the test tube to the marketplace. Biomol. Eng.20, 459–466.10.1016/S1389-0344(03)00076-5
77
OnoE.CuelloJ. L. (2007). Carbon dioxide mitigation using thermophilic cyanobacteria. Biosyst. Eng.96, 129–134.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.09.010
78
OrcuttD. M.PattersonG. W. (1974). Effect of light intensity upon Nitzschia closterium (Cylindrotheca fusiformis). Lipids9, 1000–1003.10.1007/BF02533825
79
PackerM. (2009). Algal capture of carbon dioxide; biomass generation as a tool for greenhouse gas mitigation with reference to New Zealand energy strategy and policy. Energy Policy37, 3428–3437.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.025
80
Page-SharpM.BehmC. A.SmithG. D. (1998). Cyanophycin and glycogen synthesis in a cyanobacterial Scytonema species in response to salt stress. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.160, 11–15.10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb12883.x
81
PalD.Khozin-GoldbergI.CohenZ.BoussibaS. (2011). The effect of light, salinity, and nitrogen availability on lipid production by Nannochloropsis sp. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.90, 1429–1441.10.1007/s00253-011-3170-1
82
PedersenM. F.HansenP. J. (2003). Effects of high pH on the growth and survival of six marine heterotrophic protists. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.260, 33–41.10.3354/meps260033
83
PolleJ. E. W.KanakagiriS.JinE. S.MasudaT.MelisA. (2002). Truncated chlorophyll antenna size of the photosystems – a practical method to improve microalgal productivity and hydrogen production in mass culture. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy27, 1257–1264.10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00116-7
84
PostA. F.DubinskyZ.WymanK.FalkowskiP. G. (1985). Physiological responses of a marine planktonic diatom to transitions in growth irradiance. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.25, 141–149.10.3354/meps025141
85
QuintanaN.Van der KooyF.Van de RheeM.VosholG.VerpoorteR. (2011). Renewable energy from cyanobacteria: energy production optimization by metabolic pathway engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.91, 471–490.10.1007/s00253-011-3394-0
86
RadakovitsR.JinkersonR. E.DarzinsA.PosewitzM. C. (2010). Genetic engineering of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryotic Cell9, 486–501.10.1128/EC.00364-09
87
RadmerR. J.ParkerB. C. (1994). Commercial applications of algae: opportunities and constraints. J. Appl. Phycol.6, 93–98.10.1007/BF02186062
88
RajaR.HemaiswaryaS.Ashok KumarN.SridharS.RengasamyR. (2008). A perspective on biotechnological potential of microalgae. Crit. Rev. Microbiol.34, 34–77.10.1080/10408410802086783
89
RaoA. R.DayanandaC.SaradaR.ShamalaT. R.RavishankarG. A. (2007). Effect of salinity on growth of green alga Botryococcus braunii and its constituents. Bioresour. Technol.98, 560–564.10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.007
90
RavenJ. A.GeiderR. J. (2006). Temperature and algal growth. New Phytol.110, 441–461.10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb00282.x
91
RawatI.Ranjith KumarR.MutandaT.BuxF. (2011). Dual role of microalgae: phycoremediation of domestic wastewater and biomass production for sustainable biofuels production. Appl. Energy88, 3411–3424.10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.025
92
RenaudS. M.ThinhL. V.LambrinidisG.ParryD. L. (2002). Effect of temperature on growth, chemical composition and fatty acid composition of tropical Australian microalgae grown in batch cultures. Aquaculture211, 195–214.10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00875-4
93
RheeG. Y. (1978). Effects of N:P atomic ratios and nitrate limitation on algal growth, cell composition, and nitrate uptake. Limnol. Oceanogr.23, 10–25.10.4319/lo.1978.23.1.0010
94
RichardsonK.BeardallJ.RavenJ. A. (1983). Adaptation of unicellular algae to irradiance: an analysis of strategies. New Phytol.93, 157–191.10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb03422.x
95
RichmondA. (2000). Microalgal biotechnology at the turn of the millennium: a personal view. J. Appl. Phycol.12, 441–451.10.1023/A:1008123131307
96
RiebesellU.RevillA. T.HoldsworthD. G.VolkmanJ. (2000). The effects of varying CO2 concentration on lipid composition and carbon isotope fractionation in Emiliania huxleyi. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta64, 4179–4192.10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00474-9
97
RodolfiL.ZittelliG. C.BassiN.PadovaniG.BiondiN.BoniniG.et al (2009). Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng.102, 100–112.10.1002/bit.22033
98
SahaS. K.UmaL.SubramanianG. (2003). Nitrogen stress induced changes in the marine cyanobacterium Oscillatoria willei BDU 130511. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.45, 263–272.10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00162-4
99
SatoN.MurataN.YoshiroM.NobuoU. (1979). Effect of growth temperature on lipid and fatty acid compositions in the blue-green algae, Anabaena variabilis and Anacystis nidulans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta572, 19–28.10.1016/0005-2760(79)90196-6
100
SchenkP. M.Thomas-HallS. R.StephenE.MarxU. C.MussgnugJ. H.PostenC.et al (2008). Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. Bioenerg. Res.1, 20–43.10.1007/s12155-008-9008-8
101
ScottS. A.DaveryM. P.DennisJ. S.HorstI.HoweC. J.Lea-SmithD. J.et al (2010). Biodiesel from algae: challenges and prospects. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.21, 277–286.10.1016/j.copbio.2010.03.005
102
SialveB.BernetN.BernardO. (2009). Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. Biotechnol. Adv.27, 409–416.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.03.001
103
SinghA.NigamP. S.MurphyJ. D. (2011a). Renewable fuels from algae: an answer to debatable land based fuels. Bioresour. Technol.102, 10–16.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.032
104
SinghA.NigamP. S.MurphyJ. D. (2011b). Mechanism and challenges in commercialization of algal biofuels. Bioresour. Technol.102, 26–34.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.057
105
SinghA.OlsenS. I.NigamP. S. (2011c). A viable technology to generate third-generation biofuel. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.86, 1349–1353.10.1002/jctb.2666
106
SinghA.OlsenS. I. (2011). A critical review of biochemical conversion, sustainability and life cycle assessment of algal biofuels. Appl. Energy88, 3548–3555.10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.012
107
SinghA.OlsenS. I.PantD. (2013). “Importance of life cycle assessment of renewable energy sources,” in Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources, Green Energy and Technology Series, eds SinghA.PantD.OlsenS. I. (London: Springer-Verlag), 1–11.
108
SinghA.PantD.OlsenS. I.NigamP. S. (2012). Key issues to consider in microalgae based biodiesel production. Energy Edu. Sci. Technol. Part A Energy Sci. Res.29, 687–700.
109
SinghN. K.DharD. W. (2011). Microalgae as second generation biofuel. A review. Agro. Sustain. Dev.31, 605–629.10.1007/s13593-011-0018-0
110
SinghS.BhushanK. N.BanerjeeU. C. (2005). Bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria and microalgae: an overview. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.25, 73–95.10.1080/07388550500248498
111
SkjånesK.KnutsenG.KällqvistT.LindbladP. (2008). H2 production from marine and freshwater species of green algae during sulfur deprivation and considerations for bioreactor design. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy33, 511–521.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.09.040
112
SpoehrH. A.MilnerH. W. (1949). The chemical composition of Chlorella; effect of environmental conditions. Plant Physiol.24, 120–149.10.1104/pp.24.1.120
113
SpolaoreP.Joannis-CassanC.DuranE.IsambetA. (2006). Commercial applications of microalgae. J. Biosci. Bioeng.101, 87–96.10.1263/jbb.101.87
114
StalL. J.ReedR. H. (1987). Low-molecular mass carbohydrate accumulation in cyanobacteria from a marine microbial mat in response to salt. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.45, 305–312.10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02381.x
115
StanierR. Y.CohenbazireG. (1977). Phototrophic prokaryotes-cyanobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.31, 225–274.10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.001301
116
SukenikA.CarmeliY.BernerT. (1989). Regulation of fatty acid composition by irradiance level in the eustigmatophyte Nannochloropsis sp. J. Phycol.25, 686–692.10.1111/j.0022-3646.1989.00686.x
117
SukenikA.YamaguchiY.LivneA. (1993). Alterations in lipid molecular species of the marine eustigmatophyte Nannochloropsis sp. J. Phycol.29, 620–626.10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00620.x
118
SunX.GaoY.XuH.LiuY.SunJ.QiaoD.et al (2014). Effect of nitrogen-starvation, light intensity and iron on triacylglyceride/carbohydrate production and fatty acid profile of Neochloris oleoabundans HK-129 by a two-stage process. Bioresour. Technol.155, 204–212.10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.109
119
TakagiM.KarsenoYoshidaT. (2006). Effect of salt concentration on intracellular accumulation of lipids and triacylglyceride in marine microalgae Dunaliella cells. J. Biosci. Bioeng.101, 223–226.10.1263/jbb.101.223
120
TakedaT.MiyaoK.TamoiM.KanaboshiH.MiyasakaH.ShigeokaS. (2003). Molecular characterization of glutathione peroxidase-like protein in halotolerant Chlamydomonas sp. W80. Physiol. Plant117, 467–475.10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00075.x
121
TsuzukiM.OhnumaE.SatoN.TakakuT.KawaguchiA. (1990). Effects of CO2 concentration during growth on fatty acid composition in microalgae. Plant Physiol.93, 851–856.10.1104/pp.93.3.851
122
van OijenT.van LeeuweM. A.GieskesW. W. C.de BaarH. J. W. (2004). Effects of iron limitation on photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in the Antarctic diatom Chaetoceros brevis (Bacillariophyceae). Eur. J. Phycol.39, 161–171.10.1080/0967026042000202127
123
VonshakA.RichmondA. (1981). Photosynthetic and respiratory activity in Anacystis nidulans adapted to osmotic stress. Plant Physiol.68, 504–505.10.1104/pp.68.2.504
124
WadaH.MurataN. (1990). Temperature-induced changes in the fatty acid composition of the cyanobacterium, Synechocystis PCC6803. Plant Physiol.92, 1062–1069.10.1104/pp.92.4.1062
125
WalkerT. L.PurtonS.BeckerD. K.ColletC. (2005). Microalgae as bioreactors. Plant Cell Rep.24, 629–641.10.1007/s00299-005-0004-6
126
WalshK.JonesG. J.HughD. R. (1997). Effect of irradiance on fatty acid, carotenoid, total protein composition and growth of Microcystis aeruginosa. Phytochemistry44, 817–824.10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00573-0
127
WarrS. R. C.ReedR. H.StewartW. D. P. (1985). Carbohydrate accumulation in osmotically stressed cyanobacteria (blue-green algae): interactions of temperature and salinity. New Phytol.100, 285–292.10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02779.x
128
WeissmanJ. C.GoebelR. P. (1985). Production of Liquid Fuels and Chemicals by Microalgae (Report SERI/STR-231-2649, Subcontract No. XK-3-03136, Contract No. DE-AC02-83CH10093). Golden, CO: Solar Energy Research Institute, Prepared for US Department of Energy, 116.
129
WijffelsR. H.BarbosaM. J. (2010). An outlook on microalgal biofuels. Science329, 796–799.10.1126/science.1189003
130
WuZ.ZhuY.HuangW.ZhangC.LiT.ZhangY.et al (2012). Evaluation of flocculation induced by pH increase for harvesting microalgae and reuse of flocculated medium. Bioresour. Technol.110, 496–502.10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.101
131
XinL.Hong-yingH.KeG.Ying-xueS. (2010). Effects of different nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations on the growth, nutrient uptake, and lipid accumulation of a freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus sp. Bioresour. Technol.101, 5494–5500.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.016
132
XuX. Q.BeardallJ. (1997). Effect of salinity on fatty acid composition of a green microalgae from an Antarctic hypersaline lake. Phytochemistry45, 655–658.10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00868-0
133
YildizF. H.DaviesJ. P.GrossmanA. C. (1994). Characterization of sulfate transport in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii during sulfur-limited and sulfur-sufficient growth. Plant Physiol.104, 981–987.10.1104/pp.104.3.981
134
YoshimuraK.MiyaoK.GaberA.TakedaT.KanaboshiH.MiyasakaH.et al (2004). Enhancement of stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing Chlamydomonas glutathione peroxidase in chloroplasts or cytosol. Plant J.37, 21–33.10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01930.x
Summary
Keywords
microalgae, biofuel, environment, stress, biomass
Citation
Cheng D and He Q (2014) Assessment of Environmental Stresses for Enhanced Microalgal Biofuel Production – An Overview. Front. Energy Res. 2:26. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2014.00026
Received
10 April 2014
Accepted
23 June 2014
Published
07 July 2014
Volume
2 - 2014
Edited by
Qiang Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Reviewed by
Anoop Singh, Denmark Technical University, Denmark; Umakanta Jena, Desert Research Institute, USA
Copyright
© 2014 Cheng and He.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dan Cheng and Qingfang He, Department of Applied Science, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 South University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA e-mail: dxcheng@ualr.edu; qfhe@ualr.edu
This article was submitted to Bioenergy and Biofuels, a section of the journal Frontiers in Energy Research.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.