CORRECTION article

Front. Energy Res., 18 September 2020

Sec. Sustainable Energy Systems

Volume 8 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00220

Corrigendum: Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of Industrial CO2 Capture and Storage – A Swedish Case Study

  • Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

In the original article, there were two typographical errors in the citations included in the foot notes of Table 5 as published. In foot note 1, the citation to Garðarsdóttir et al. (2018) was incorrectly written as Güleç et al. (2020). In footnote 2, the citation to Kjärstad et al. (2016) was incorrectly written as Skogsindustrierna (2016). The corrected Table 5 appears below.

Table 5

ID-#/Heat PotentialCAPEXOPEXTOTALTransport Hub2Distr. Heat4Heat estimate5
M/a1Fixed, M/aVariable, M/aSpec., €/tCO2
C-16,71361061#6ChICaSP Quant.
IS-132293340#1yesChICaSP Quant.
IS-231361442#1ChICaSP Quant.
IS-3#4ChICaSP Desc.
St. 163667
St. 263667
St. 3105843
Mi-122103040#4yesOther
PP-01#4yesChICaSP Quant.
St. 12092745
St. 253476
PP-02#2Other
St. 12093249
St. 253476
PP-03#2Other
St. 11882751
St. 253480
PP-04#6yesOther
St. 11672353
St. 243385
PP-05#2yesOther
St. 11672253
St. 243386
PP-068#2yesChICaSP Quant.
St. 11571750
St. 242389
PP-07#1yesOther
St. 11572054
St. 242390
PP-08#4yesOther
St. 11461856
St. 242294
PP-09#5yesOther
St. 11361756
St. 242295
PP-108#6yesChICaSP Desc.
St. 11361452
St. 242295
PP-11#6yesOther
St. 11361756
St. 242296
PP-12#2yesChICaSP Quant.
St. 11361657
St. 242297
PP-13#1ChICaSP Desc.
St. 11361657
St. 242299
PP-141251459#5yesOther
PP-15#1yesOther
St. 11151260
St. 2322108
PP-16#4yesOther
St. 11151260
St. 2322108
PP-17#2ChICaSP Desc.
St. 11051161
St. 2321112
PP-18#2Other
St. 11051162
St. 2321114
PP-19#6Other
St. 1951064
St. 2321120
PP-2094964#2Other
R-17#6ChICaSP Quant.
St. 184750
St. 2105966
St. 384870
St. 463575
R-27#6yesOther
St. 184566
St. 263582
R-37#6yesChICaSP Quant.
St. 174567
St. 263483

Mapping of potential for implementing carbon capture and storage at Swedish emission sources >500 kt/a.

Heat availability: Green >1 MJ/kg CO2 emitted, Red no significant potential for low-cost steam generation.

1

Adopted from the work by Garðarsdóttir et al. (2018).

2

Adopted from the work by Kjärstad et al. (2016).

3

IS-1 is a CHP plant integrated with the IS-2 steel mill.

4

Potential competition with district heating.

5

Method for excess heat estimation: ChICaSP Quant.) Quantitative estimate based on data available in case study portfolio, ChICaSP Desc.) Descriptive assessment based on information in case study portfolio Other) Estimate based on comparison with models or similar sites.

6

Part of industrial cluster. Excess heat assumed to be available also from neighboring process plants.

7

Excess heat potential strongly dependent on temperature requirement.

8

Mill increased capacity significantly after 2016. Excess heat estimation made for prospective future production levels and site energy system.

In the original article, information was missing in the reference for European Environment Agency [EEA] (2016), which was incorrectly written as European Environment Agency [EEA] (2016). European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register(E-PRTR). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. It should be European Environment Agency [EEA] (2016). European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register(E-PRTR). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. Available online at:http://prtr.eea.europa.eu/#/facilitylevels(accessed September 30, 2018).

In the original article, the reference for Swedish Ministry of the Environment (2017) was incorrectly written as Government Offices of Sweden, and Ministry of the Environment and Energy (2017). The Swedish Climate Policy Framework. Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment. It should be Swedish Ministry of the Environment (2017). The Swedish Climate Policy Framework. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden; Ministry of the Environment.

In the original article, the reference for Skogsindustrierna (2016) was incorrectly written as Skogsindustrierna, (2016). Skogsindustriernas Miljödatabas (Forest IndustriesEnvironmental Database. Bentley, WA: Forest Industries Federation. It should be Skogsindustrierna (2016). Skogsindustriernas Miljödatabas Forest Industries EnvironmentalDatabase. Stockholm: Swedish Forest Industries Federation. Available online at:http://miljodatabas.skogsindustrierna.org/(accessed August 31, 2018).

In the original article, information was missing in the reference for Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA] (2016a), which was incorrectly written as Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA], (2016a). Statistik ochUppföljning. Stockholm: Environmental Protection Agency. It should be Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA], (2016a). Statistik och Uppföljning. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Available online at:https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Miljoarbete-i-samhallet/Miljoarbete-i-Sverige/Uppdelat-efter-omrade/Utslappshandel/Resultat-och-uppfoljning(accessed March 31, 2018).

In the original article, information was missing in the reference for Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA] (2016b), which was incorrectly written as Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA], (2016b). SwedishPollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR). Stockholm: Environmental Protection Agency. It should be Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [SEPA] (2016b). Swedish Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR). Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Available online at:https://utslappisiffror.naturvardsverket.se/Sok/(accessed March 31, 2018).

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

References

  • 1

    GarðarsdóttirS. Ó, Normann, F.SkagestadR.JohnssonF. (2018). Investment costs and CO2 reduction potential of carbon capture from industrial plants – A Swedish case study. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control76, 111124. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.06.022

  • 2

    KjärstadJ.SkagestadR.EldrupN. H.JohnssonF. (2016). Ship transport—A low cost and low risk CO2 transport option in the Nordic countries. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control54, 168184. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.024

Summary

Keywords

CCS, CO2 capture, MACC, industrial, case study

Citation

Johnsson F, Normann F and Svensson E (2020) Corrigendum: Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of Industrial CO2 Capture and Storage – A Swedish Case Study. Front. Energy Res. 8:220. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00220

Received

11 August 2020

Accepted

11 August 2020

Published

18 September 2020

Approved by

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

8 - 2020

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Filip Johnsson

This article was submitted to Sustainable Energy Systems and Policies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Energy Research

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics