Abstract
Though many animal ornaments and signals are sensitive to and encode information about the oxidative balance (OB) of individuals (e.g., antioxidant supplies/activity, reactive oxygen species, cellular oxidative damage/repair), often the environmental and/or physiological sources of such OB are unknown. Urban development is among the most recent, pervasive, and persistent human stressors on the planet and impacts many environmental and physiological parameters of animals. Here we review the mechanistic underpinnings and functional consequences of how human urbanization drives antioxidant/oxidative status in animals and how this affects signal expression and use. Although we find that urbanization has strong negative effects on signal quality (e.g., visual, auditory, chemical) and OB across a range of taxa, few urban ecophysiological studies address signals and oxidative stress in unison, and even fewer in a fitness context. We also highlight particular signal types, taxa, life-histories, and anthropogenic environmental modifications on which future work integrating OB, signals, and urbanization could be centered. Last, we examine the conceptual and empirical framework behind the idea that urban conditions may disentangle signal expression from honesty and affect plasticity and adaptedness of sexually selected traits and preferences in the city.
General background
Many conspicuous traits in animals, such as songs, odorants, and bright colors, can reveal the quality of individuals and are used as signals in competition for mates or other resources (Andersson, 1994; Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 2011). The fitness-related qualities that such condition-dependent signals reveal include disease resistance (Hamilton and Zuk, 1982; Blount et al., 2003), nutrition (Walker et al., 2013), parental effort (Badyaev and Hill, 2002; Massaro et al., 2003), and oxidative stress (OS; i.e., accumulation of free-radical damage, including lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, and/or genotoxic damage). Recent empirical work suggests that oxidative balance (OB; i.e., balance between free-radical molecules and antioxidant defenses; Tomášek et al., 2016) integrates many aspects of individual quality/condition (e.g., disease, diet, stress) and can be an important modulator of signal production (von Schantz et al., 1999; Garratt and Brooks, 2012; Henschen et al., 2015). However, we need a deeper understanding of the extent to which oxidative challenges affect different organisms with different signals, environments, genetics, and life-histories.
A number of natural environmental factors, including heat stress and population density (Costantini, 2010; Costantini et al., 2010), are known to generate oxidative imbalance in organisms, via the accumulation of damaging pro-oxidant byproducts of cellular respiration, disruptions to the activity of endogenous antioxidants (e.g., melatonin, enzymes such as superoxide dismutase), or depletion/availability of exogenous dietary antioxidant supplies (e.g., vitamin E, carotenoids). Only recently have biologists begun to address the effects of more large-scale human-induced rapid environmental changes, such as urbanization, on OB and animal signals (Isaksson, 2015). Many local ecological parameters can be altered by human activities in cities and may disproportionately depress or elevate OB and environmentally sensitive sexually selected signals (Hill, 1995). Indeed, experimental research has demonstrated that many urban-associated environmental factors can cause either a reduction in antioxidant availability/expression, an increase in pro-oxidant production, and/or an increase in OS (Isaksson, 2015). Chemical contaminants (Isaksson, 2010), light pollution (Navara and Nelson, 2007), noise pollution (Demirel et al., 2009), altered diet (Isaksson and Andersson, 2007; Andersson et al., 2015), and changes in social interactions (Beaulieu et al., 2014) are candidate modulators of OB in urban animals. Alternatively, animals may experience fewer negative effects on OB in urban areas, perhaps due to increased resources or lower perceived predation threat (Janssens and Stoks, 2013). Thus, though urbanization may have positive or negative effects on OB (perhaps based on taxon-specific life-history traits, including current physiological condition or behavioral/physiological plasticity; see Figure 1A), we are currently unaware of the prevailing effects of urbanization on OB and signaling. Therefore, we need an overarching evaluation of the linkages between urban environmental pressures, OB, and the expression and evolution of animal signals.
Figure 1
(A) Conceptual diagram depicting urban effects on oxidative balance (OB) and signal expression. (1) Urban environments can produce unique stressors for animals, such as chemical, noise and light pollution, and habitat and diet alteration. (2) Animals respond to urban stressors based on their unique life-histories, which include the physiological and behavioral sensitivity to stressors during particular phases of life (e.g., development, dispersal, breeding). Additionally, within life-history stages, current physiological condition and behavioral/physiological plasticity likely mediate susceptibility to changes in OB. (3) Ultimately, these ‘life-history filters’ govern whether and how OB shifts in urban animals. The relative abundance current antioxidants vs. pro-oxidants contributes to the accumulation of oxidative stress. (4) Therefore, the OB of animals can influence ornament expression and associated traits (e.g., survival, fecundity). (B) Study organisms that exemplify strong past empirical efforts or provide interesting routes for future research on OB and signaling in cities. (1) Oxidative stress, song, and carotenoid- and melanin-based color signals have been studied extensively in urban and rural great tits (Parus major). For example, tits have drabber yellow flanks and increase the frequency of song in the city, both of which are sexually selected traits (Hõrak et al., 2000; Halfwerk et al., 2011). Interestingly, selection on the width of the black breast tie is reversed in urban environments, suggesting this trait may have entered a dishonest signaling state (Senar et al., 2014). (2) Studies of the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis) have revealed significant changes to many modalities of communication, such as tail shading (Yeh, 2004), preen oil composition (Whittaker et al., 2010), and song characteristics (Slabbekoorn et al., 2007). (3) Mammals such as gerbils (Family: Gerbillinae) provide interesting future routes to explore the effects of urbanization on OB and olfactory communication in this clade. The abundance of Indian gerbils (Tatera indica), for example (Prakesh et al., 1998), in both urban and rural environments make this organism a strong candidate for studies of urban chemical signaling and OB in mammals. All images obtained through Wikimedia Commons.
Here we review literature and understudied/untested ideas surrounding three critical questions related to animal signaling and OB in urban environments: (1) How might urbanization have physiological effects on OB and signal expression?; (2) Are different organisms or signal modalities more or less prone to urban-induced change in OB and signal quality?; and (3) How might urbanization shape the links between OB and signal honesty?
Overview of literature linking OB, signals, and urbanization
We surveyed the literature for studies on the relationship(s) between signal expression, OB, and/or urban conditions in animals. We found a total of 57 studies linking urbanization and signaling: consistent with the early hypothesis advanced by Hill (1995) that sexual ornaments act as indicators of environmental quality, the majority (70%) of published studies on this topic reveal that animals have reduced signal quality in urban settings (Tables 1A,B; Figure 1B). This suggests that urban environments contain pervasive pressures that are stressful to animals across a range of clades and signal types. Urbanization enhanced signal expression in only 14% of studies. Interestingly, 4 of the 6 studies on melanin-based ornaments in birds show increased signal expression in the city; it is noteworthy that expression of melanin ornaments is related to resistance of both disease (Jacquin et al., 2011) and OS (Henschen et al., 2015), which may be beneficial in the pro-disease (Giraudeau et al., 2014a) and pro-oxidant urban environment. Taken together, these studies indicate that urban environments have overall strong negative impacts on the expression of animal signals, though it is not often known if these effects are plastic or adaptive (McDonnell and Hahs, 2015).
Table 1
| A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | Common name | Scientific name | Ornamentation | Reference |
| Amphibia | Common eastern froglet | Crinia signifera | −A (voc) | Parris et al., 2009 |
| European tree frog | Hyla arborea | −V (car); 0 A (voc) | Troïanowski et al., 2015 | |
| Southern brown tree frog | Litoria ewingii | −A (voc) | Parris et al., 2009 | |
| Aves | American robin | Turdus migratorious | −A (voc) | Seger-Fullam et al., 2011 |
| American robin | Turdus migratorious | + A (voc) | Dowling et al., 2012 | |
| Black-capped chickadee | Poecile atricapillus | −A (voc) | Lazerte et al., 2015 | |
| Carolina wren | Thyrothorus ludovicianus | 0 A (voc) | Dowling et al., 2012 | |
| Comparative analysis | – | −A (voc) | Hu and Cardoso, 2010 | |
| Dark-eyed junco | Junco hyemalis | −V (struct) | Yeh, 2004 | |
| Dark-eyed junco | Junco hyemalis | ? Olf (gland)a | Whittaker et al., 2010 | |
| Dark-eyed junco | Junco hyemalis | −A (voc) | Slabbekoorn et al., 2007 | |
| Eastern bluebird | Sialia sialis | −A (voc) | Kight and Swaddle, 2015 | |
| Eurasian wren | Troglodytes troglodytes | 0 A (voc) | Yang and Slabbekoorn, 2014 | |
| European blackbird | Turdus merula | −A (voc) | Ripmeester et al., 2010 | |
| Florida scrub-jay | Aphelocoma coerulescens | −V (struct) | Tringali and Bowman, 2015 | |
| Gray catbird | Dumetella carolinensis | −A (voc) | Dowling et al., 2012 | |
| Great tit | Parus major | −V (car) | Hõrak et al., 2000 | |
| Great tit | Parus major | −V (car) | Hõrak et al., 2001 | |
| Great tit | Parus major | −V (mel) | Senar et al., 2014 | |
| Great tit | Parus major | −A (voc) | Halfwerk et al., 2011 | |
| Great tit | Parus major | −A (voc) | Mockford and Marshall, 2009 | |
| House finch | Haemorhous mexicanus | + V (car) | Hill, 1993 | |
| House finch | Haemorhous mexicanus | −V (car) | Hasegawa et al., 2014 | |
| House finch | Haemorhous mexicanus | + A (voc) | Badyaev et al., 2008 | |
| House finch | Haemorhous mexicanus | −A (voc) | Fernández-Juricic et al., 2005 | |
| House finch | Haemorhous mexicanus | −A (voc) | Giraudeau et al., 2014b | |
| House wren | Troglodytes aedon | 0 A (voc) | Dowling et al., 2012 | |
| House wren | Troglodytes aedon | −A (voc) | Redondo et al., 2013 | |
| Mountain chickadee | Poecile gambeli | −A (voc) | Lazerte et al., 2015 | |
| Noisy miner | Manorina melanocephala | −A (voc) | Lowry et al., 2012 | |
| Northern cardinal | Cardinalis cardinalis | −V (car) | Jones et al., 2010 | |
| Northern cardinal | Cardinalis cardinalis | −A (voc) | Dowling et al., 2012 | |
| Northern cardinal | Cardinalis cardinalis | −A (voc) | Narango and Rodewald, 2016 | |
| Northern cardinal | Cardinalis cardinalis | −A (voc) | Seger-Fullam et al., 2011 | |
| Red-winged blackbird | Agelaius phoeniceus | 0 V (dis); −A (voc) | Ríos-Chelén et al., 2015 | |
| Rock dove | Columba livia | + V (mel) | Jacquin et al., 2011 | |
| Rock dove | Columba livia | + V (mel) | Obukhova, 2007 | |
| Rock dove | Columba livia | + V (mel) | Obukhova, 2011 | |
| Saffron finch | Sicalis flaveola | −A (voc) | Leon et al., 2014 | |
| Silvereye | Zosterops lateralis | M A (voc)b | Potvin and Parris, 2012 | |
| Silvereye | Zosterops lateralis | + A (voc) | Potvin et al., 2014 | |
| Silvereye | Zosterops lateralis | −A (voc) | Potvin and Mulder, 2013 | |
| Song sparrow | Melospiza melodia | 0 A (voc) | Dowling et al., 2012 | |
| Song sparrow | Melospiza melodia | −A (voc) | Wood and Yezerinac, 2006 | |
| Vermillion flycatcher | Pyrocephalus rubinus | −A (voc) | Ríos-Chelén et al., 2013 | |
| Gastropoda | – | Cepea vindobonensis | ? V (unk)c | Kramarenko et al., 2007 |
| Insecta | Fruit fly | Drosophila kikkawai | −V (mel) | Costa et al., 2003 |
| Grasshopper | Chorthippus biguttulus | −A (strid) | Lampe et al., 2012 | |
| Grasshopper | Chorthippus biguttulus | −A (strid) | Lampe et al., 2014 | |
| Meadow froghopper | Philaenus spumarius | + V (mel) | Stewart and Lees, 1996 | |
| Taiwanese cicada | Cryptotympana takasagona | 0 A (strid) | Shieh et al., 2012 | |
| Tree cricket | Oecanthus spp. | −A (strid) | Costello and Symes, 2014 | |
| Mammalia | Indian gerbil | Tatera indica | −Olf (gland) | Prakesh et al., 1998 |
| B | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | Common name | Scientific name | Antioxidants | Oxidative stress | Ornamentation | References |
| Aves | House finch | Haemorhous mexicanus | M card | + lip | −V (car) | Giraudeau et al., 2015 |
| Great tit | Parus major | 0 GSH | + G:G | −V (car) | Isaksson et al., 2005 | |
| Great tit | Parus major | 0 car; 0 VA; 0 VE | −V (car) | Hõrak et al., 2004 | ||
| C | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | Common name | Scientific name | Antioxidants | Oxidative stress | References |
| Actinopterygii | Fathead minnow | Pimphales promelas | 0 CAT; 0 GPx; + GST; + GR; −SOD | + G:G | Jasinska et al., 2015 |
| Fathead minnow | Pimphales promelas | + GST | Crago et al., 2011 | ||
| Red mullet | Mullus barbatus | 0 CAT; −GPx | Lionetto et al., 2003 | ||
| Amphibia | Eurasian marsh frog | Rana ridibunda | 0 CAT; + GSH; −SOD | −lip; −pro | Falfushinska H. I. et al., 2008 |
| Eurasian marsh frog | Rana ridibunda | 0 CAT; 0 GSH; 0 SOD | 0 pro; + lip | Falfushinska H. et al., 2008 | |
| Aves | Comparative analysis | – | −car; −VE | Møller et al., 2010 | |
| European blackbird | Turdus merula | −GPx; −OXY | 0 lip | Costantini et al., 2014 | |
| European blackbird | Turdus merula | −melatonin | Dominoni et al., 2013 | ||
| Great tit | Parus major | 0 car | Isaksson et al., 2007b | ||
| Great tit | Parus major | 0 car; + TAA | Isaksson et al., 2007a | ||
| Great tit | Parus major | −car; −VE | Hõrak et al., 2002 | ||
| Great tit | Parus major | 0 car | Isaksson et al., 2008 | ||
| Herring gull | Larus argentatus | + gen | Skarphedinsdottir et al., 2010 | ||
| House finch | Haemorhous mexicanus | 0 VE; −car; −VA | 0 lip | Giraudeau and McGraw, 2014 | |
| House finch | Haemorhous mexicanus | + gen | Suárez-Rodríguez and Macías Garcia, 2014 | ||
| House sparrow | Passer domesticus | 0 CAT; 0 SOD; −TAA | 0 G:G; 0 lip; 0 pro | Herrera-Dueñas et al., 2014 | |
| White stork | Ciconia ciconia | −melatonin | Kulczykowska et al., 2007 | ||
| Bivalvia | Freshwater mussel | Pyganodon grandis | 0 GST | −lip | Jasinska et al., 2015 |
| Mediterranean mussel | Mytilus galloprovincialis | 0 CAT; 0 GPx | Lionetto et al., 2003 | ||
| Insecta | – | Hydropsyche exocellata | 0 SOD; + CAT; + GST; −GPx | + lip | Barata et al., 2005 |
| Comparative analysis | Order: Lepidoptera | −car | Isaksson and Andersson, 2007 | ||
| Mammalia | Human | Homo sapiens sapiens | + lip | Bono et al., 2014 | |
| Reptilia | Blue spiny lizard | Sceloporus serrifer | −GST; −SOD | Aguilera et al., 2012 | |
| Geoffrey's toadhead turtle | Phrynops geoffroanus | + GST; + TAA | + lip | Venancio et al., 2013 | |
| Side-blotched lizard | Uta stansburiana | 0 OSe | Lucas and French, 2012 | ||
Summary of studies that associate urbanization with (A) animal signals, (B) both animal signals and oxidative stress and/or antioxidants, and (C) just oxidative stress and/or antioxidants.
Included were studies that compare signal or oxidative balance/stress components along an urban gradient or between urban and rural environments. We excluded studies that met the prior criterion, but did not have some feasible mechanism by which oxidative balance would alter signal expression. Studies of oxidative dynamics may have included studies of dietary and/or endogenously produced antioxidants, pro-oxidants, or current oxidative stress. However, we found only a single study for which pro-oxidants were measured in vitroe and therefore only present columns for antioxidants and oxidative stress. For ornament expression (A,B), symbols denote whether ornament quality increased (+) or decreased (−) in quality in the city, or whether there was no effect (0). Letters are used to indicate the modality of the signal, whether visual (V), auditory (A), or olfactory (Olf). Here, ornament quality is defined on a taxon-by-taxon basis in terms of known mate preference patterns in ex-urban environments. For example, in house finches, females prefer red over yellow males as mates and therefore redder males have greater ornament quality. “Unknown effects” is used when ornament quality could not be evaluated because ornament preference for a taxon was unavailable or unclear. In (B,C), symbols show whether urbanization increased (+), decreased (−), or had no effect (0) on antioxidants or OS. For further clarification see Beaulieu and Costantini (2014). Additional abbreviations for signals: car, carotenoids or carotenoid pigmentation; dis, visual motor display; gland, glandular excretion; mel, melanin; struct, structural color or shade; strid, stridulations; voc, vocalizations. Additional abbreviations for oxidative balance and stress: car, carotenoids; CAT, catalase; gen, genotoxic damage; G:G, reduced to oxidized glutathione ratio; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH, glutathione; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; lip, lipid peroxidation; OXY, non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity; pro, protein carbonylation; SOD, sodium oxide dismutase; TAA, total antioxidant activity; VA, vitamin A; VE, vitamin E.
a.^Mate preference, and therefore effect of urbanization on signal quality is unknown.
b.^Urbanization had varying effects on quality of different song components.
c.^Shell coloration of unknown mechanism, and mate preference and therefore effect of urbanization on signal quality is unknown.
d.^Urbanization had varying effects on different circulating plasma carotenoids.
e.^Oxidative stress calculated as difference between standardized reactive oxygen species and OXY.
Of the nine studies that specifically tested for urban-rural differences in dietary antioxidants, 44% showed antioxidant reductions in urban compared to rural environments, and none showed an increase (Tables 1B,C). Urban antioxidant depletion may arise if dietary antioxidants are harder to procure in urban environments (Isaksson, 2009) and/or to maintain in the body as they are destroyed by elevated pro-oxidants (reviewed in Seifried et al., 2007). The fact that antioxidants were depleted in nearly half of the studies on urban animals is consistent with results of a large comparative study by Møller et al. (2010), who found that urban birds have lower levels of liver carotenoids and vitamin E than rural counterparts. We also found that endogenous antioxidant enzyme activity showed variable differences between urban and rural environments, as they both decreased and increased in a handful of studies (27 and 33% of total, respectively) (Tables 1B,C). The failure to find consistent urban-rural variation in antioxidants could reflect how organisms tend to up-regulate endogenous antioxidant activity after an oxidative challenge, but how prolonged and intense oxidative challenge may eventually overpower and deplete endogenous defenses (Finkel and Holbrook, 2000; Finkel, 2003). Alternatively, this pattern may reflect differences among studies in the timing of antioxidant measurement (e.g., due to seasonal or life-history-stage-related fluctuations; Barata et al., 2005; Falfushinska H. et al., 2008; Giraudeau and McGraw, 2014) or the use of different antioxidant tests (Beaulieu and Costantini, 2014). Therefore we stress that (1) more consistent tests of antioxidants should be conducted, all with strong biological rationale for the question(s) being asked, and (2) studies should combine measurements of past oxidative damage, current oxidative threats, as well as the actions, intake, and mobilized stores of various antioxidants, as it is difficult to interpret each independently (Beaulieu and Costantini, 2014; Costantini, 2016).
We located 15 published studies that investigated urban-rural differences in OS, 60% of which showed that urban environments have negative effects on OS (Tables 1B,C). These studies used a variety of OS metrics, and based on this evidence it appears that urbanization increases lipid peroxidation and genotoxic damage, but the only two studies on protein carbonylation failed to find similar trends. One exciting study shows that novel resource use can generate a trade-off between OS and parasite avoidance; although urban house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus) that line nests with cigarette butts experience reduced parasitism, they suffer increased genotoxic damage, presumably due to chemical contaminant exposure (Suárez-Rodríguez and Macías Garcia, 2014). In addition to the aforementioned evidence that cities disrupt signal quality, the fact that cities affect overall OS provides deeper evidence that urban environments alter environmental and physiological conditions that are key for the production and maintenance of quality signals. Still, there may be taxon- or life-history-specific effects of urbanization, given that not all studies found urban impacts on OS.
Surprisingly, we found only three studies (all on carotenoid color signals of birds) that simultaneously tested urban-rural differences in OB and signals (Hõrak et al., 2004; Isaksson et al., 2005; Giraudeau et al., 2015) (Table 1B). Both Isaksson et al. (2005) and Giraudeau et al. (2015) report drabber plumage coloration and increased levels of OS in Swedish great tits (Parus major) and house finches, respectively. In breeding Estonian great tits, Hõrak et al. (2004) found a strong trend that city birds are drabber in color, but no urban-rural difference in levels of dietary antioxidants. This limited dataset also suggests that OB is a potential critical constraint on signal production in the city. Taken altogether, studies testing urban effects on OB and signals both independently and simultaneously reveal the general pattern that urban animals experience both impaired OB and signal expression. However, we urge more comprehensive testing of this idea across animal clades and signaling modalities (see more below).
Signal modalities and taxonomic perspectives
Urban environments are inhabited by a diversity of animals that have different communication modalities, life-history traits, developmental histories, and adaptabilities. Thus, cities may present unique oxidative and signaling challenges to specific taxa or ornament types. In other words, urban stressors ‘filter’ through taxon-specific life-history variation (e.g., metamorphosis, home-range size, current physiological state, behavioral/physiological plasticity) before ultimately influencing OB and signal quality (Figure 1A). Based on such differences in oxidative susceptibility, some animals may inherently rely more on either endogenous or exogenous antioxidants or suffer more oxidative damage. In the same vein, some ornament modalities may be more sensitive to cities and OB disruptions than others, and one hypothesis is that those signals that are both directly (e.g., song masking by noise; Gil et al., 2015) and indirectly (i.e., OS) affected by urban environmental conditions will be most disrupted.
Despite the potential ecological and evolutionary insights gained by studying urban effects on signaling and OB in diverse taxa, studies have overwhelmingly been performed on the ornaments and OB of birds (73% of total), with a notable paucity of studies on mammals, reptiles, fish, and invertebrates. Moreover, among the various animal-signaling modalities (e.g., visual, auditory, olfactory), studies of acoustic signals (68% of total) and colors (32% of total; some studies include multiple ornaments and therefore sum >100%) dominate the types of ornaments studied in relation to urbanization and OB to date (see Figure 1B for breakdown of strong past and future study systems). Only a handful of studies were performed on other modalities, such as motor displays (Ríos-Chelén et al., 2015) or olfactory (Whittaker et al., 2010) communication.
Studies of some signaling modalities have better considered the impacts of OB than others. As referenced above, studies of plumage coloration in birds like house finches and great tits have best wrapped together both signals and OB (Isaksson et al., 2007a; Giraudeau and McGraw, 2014), perhaps because of the natural links between carotenoid nutrition, OB, and plumage coloration (Blount, 2004; Svensson and Wong, 2011). Conversely, despite the large proportion of urban studies on auditory communication, the majority are considered in the context of short-term behavioral plasticity in noisy environments, few are in the context of individual quality, and none are from an OB perspective (Narango and Rodewald, 2016). Therefore, we stand to gain from reciprocally testing the current knowledge gaps for each modality: the behavioral/physiological plasticity of color ornaments (e.g., combined use in behavioral display, rapidly changeable bare parts) and how acoustic signals co-vary with urban oxidative conditions. For example, song learning and quality may be disrupted in the city, due to oxidative damage suffered to brain or vocal musculature during development (von Schantz et al., 1999; Nowicki et al., 2002; Buchanan et al., 2004) or adulthood (Garratt and Brooks, 2012).
Relatively little attention has been paid to other important signal modalities that may also be affected by cities and OB, such as chemical and electrical signals. The rare studies to date of this sort serve as exciting building-blocks; for example both male and female Indian gerbils (Tatera indica) are far less likely to express mature scent-marking glands in urban environments (Prakesh et al., 1998), perhaps due to increased gregariousness and reliance on close-quarters communication. The unique chemoscape of the city (e.g., chemical masking) may provide heretofore unconsidered selective pressures for animals that rely on chemical communication. Moreover, only in lab studies have links been made between OB and chemical signaling; Garratt et al. (2014) showed that both the mass of preputial glands and molecular composition of urine is depressed in knockout mice for superoxide dismutase, an endogenous antioxidant. We must now put this work in urban-ecological context and consider natural co-variation in OB and olfactory signals. Another understudied but exciting direction for future research is urban effects on OB and electrical signals of aquatic animals (Stoddard, 2002). Electrical signals may be anthropogenically altered via oxidative-stress pathways either through disruption of Ca2+ ionic homeostasis (van der Vliet and Bast, 1992) or man-made electro-magnetic fields (Consales et al., 2012). However, whether sexually selected electrical signals are sensitive to OB or electromagnetic pollution has yet to be tested in an ecological or urban context.
Future directions: broad implications for understanding urban evolution of honest signals
Honest communication requires that a signal provide fitness benefits to both sender and receiver (Maynard Smith and Harper, 2003). However, if environmental conditions change rapidly, then signals of mate quality may become uncoupled from individual quality and animals may choose low-quality mates as a result (Robinson et al., 2008; Bro-Jørgensen, 2010; Robertson et al., 2013). A classic example of this is the high rates of parasitism and mortality experienced by calling males (and females that prefer calling males) in newly introduced Polynesian field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) in Hawaii (Zuk et al., 2006; Tinghitella and Zuk, 2009); this eventually led to the rapid loss of a sexually selected trait in this species. Rapid environmental alterations in cities may also perturb conditions, including via OB, in a way that leads to dishonest signaling systems.
To date, the majority of studies on signals in urban settings operate under the assumption that signals remain condition-dependent. To ask whether signal honesty persists or degrades in urban environments, we must know if and how ornament expression is related to condition of the signal sender (i.e., OB) or fitness in both rural and urban environments, how signal receivers base mate choice on ornaments, and their resulting fitness consequences. Thus, if signal honesty degrades in urban environments, we predict that (1) ornament expression will be positively related to condition only in natural/rural environments, and there will be either no relationship or a negative relationship in urban environments, and (2) signal receivers retain a preference for the exaggerated trait, a choice that (3) ultimately impairs fitness. The mechanisms that generate dishonesty may be diverse in nature. For example, Candolin (1999) showed that three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in extremely poor condition invested heavily into ornamentation, perhaps as a last-ditch effort to acquire a mate before dying; a similar scenario may occur given that urban environments generally have negative effects on OB. Alternatively, low-quality males may produce elaborate ornaments if they exploit urban-specific resources that provide surplus mate-choice currency (e.g., carotenoid-rich human-provided foods) but no real benefit to viability or ultimately do not reflect genetic quality.
The few published studies that address this question indeed point to dishonest signaling as a potential consequence of urbanization. Perhaps the best evidence comes from work on plumage coloration of Florida scrub-jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Prior to breeding, suburban and rural jays immigrate to the same location, allowing for pairing amongst jays of urban and ex-urban origin. Suburban jays had UV-shifted plumage relative to rural jays, and suburban jays were more likely to achieve breeder status, suggesting that UV-rich plumage is preferred (Tringali and Bowman, 2015). Importantly, reproductive success was lower per unit effort in nests of suburban than rural immigrants, thereby suggesting that suburban jays dishonestly exaggerated signals of quality. Senar et al. (2014) showed that rural great tits with large melanin-based ornaments (width of the ventral black tie) were more likely to survive, whereas large-tied great tits in urban settings were less likely to survive. Though this suggests that the condition-dependent expression of tie width is altered in the city, further work is necessary to test whether urban female great tits that choose males with large black ties experience reduced fitness, and if so, whether females adaptively (or plastically; Qvarnström et al., 2000) reverse mate selection for ornament size. Unlike in these previous two cases, urbanization may also prevent the formation of dishonest signaling. For example, Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii) is an invasive nest- and food-plant for both urban and rural populations of Northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and substantially increases plumage brightness of birds that nest in and forage from it, but amplifies nest predation, ultimately lowering reproductive output of females that choose “high-quality” males. However, only in rural, but not urban landscapes do redder males prefer to nest in honeysuckle (Rodewald et al., 2011). Therefore, in the city, females that choose red males tend to avoid amplified predation rates imposed by honeysuckle. Though these few examples highlight potential dishonest signaling systems, further work is clearly needed within these systems to meet the full criteria we outlined, and to expand the diversity of modalities and taxa studied.
We have previously established that few studies investigate the mechanistic role of OB for signal production in the city. One major utility of these and future studies will be for examining the relationship between individual quality, signal quality, and signal use in both urban and rural environments. To investigate the potential for dishonest signaling systems, future studies should examine the covariation between OB and signals at the time of both ornament production and ornament use (i.e., during mate choice). For example, in urban environments, ornaments may honestly reflect individual quality at the time of production, but become dishonest before/during mate selection if the costs of bearing high-quality ornaments are disproportionately high in the city. These studies perhaps make best sense in the framework of relatively non-labile signals (e.g., dead integumentary ornaments, skeletal armaments like horns/antlers), whereas rapidly changeable signals may be less prone to dishonesty (e.g., song, bare part coloration, odorants; Hutton et al., 2015). Long-term studies of ornamentation, OB, and mate choice on species that advertise dishonestly in the city will be extremely productive for understanding urban plasticity and evolution of mate choice tactics. Additionally, species that bear multiple signals may flexibly choose mates based on those signal components/modalities that retain their reliability in the city (Troïanowski et al., 2015).
Finally, the most robust urban-ecological studies on OB and signal expression/honesty will consider the variability and heterogeneity of the cities themselves (i.e., “not all cities and their oxidative stressors are created equal”). Urban stressors and selective pressures may differ in type, timing, and intensity across diverse urban-rural landscape gradients (e.g., desert city, forest city) and within individual cities based on spatiotemporal changes in development and infrastructure, and therefore we will benefit greatly from increasingly global perspectives. Ultimately, urban environments serve as excellent, long-term and continuing “natural experiments” for understanding basic ecological, physiological, and evolutionary mechanisms underlying signal honesty, and the evolution and plasticity of mate preferences as a function of signal honesty/dishonesty (Hahs and Evans, 2015).
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number BCS-1026865, Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Author contributions
Both PH and KJM drafted and intellectually contributed to the work and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mathieu Giraudeau for helpful conversations during the early conception of this piece. Additionally, we thank David Costantini and Fabrice Helfenstein for organizing the “oxidative stress and signal honesty” research topic. Lastly, we thank Keila DeZeeuw for assistance and thoughts on figure construction.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AguileraC.del PliegoP. G.AlfaroR. M.LazcanoD.CruzJ. (2012). Pollution biomarkers in the spiny lizard (Sceloporus spp.) from two suburban populations of Monterrey, Mexico. Ecotoxicology21, 2103–2112. 10.1007/s10646-012-0978-0
2
AnderssonM. (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3
AnderssonM. N.WangH.NordA.SalmónP.IsakssonC. (2015). Composition of physiologically important fatty acids in great tits differs between urban and rural populations on a seasonal basis. Front. Ecol. Evol.3:93. 10.3389/fevo.2015.00093
4
BadyaevA. V.HillG. E. (2002). Paternal care as a conditional strategy: distinct reproductive tactics associated with elaboration of plumage ornamentation in the house finch. Behav. Ecol.13, 591–597. 10.1093/beheco/13.5.591
5
BadyaevA. V.YoungR. L.OhK. P.AddisonC. (2008). Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution62, 1951–1964. 10.1111/j.l558-5646.2008.00428.x
6
BarataC.LekumberriI.Vila-EscaléM.PratN.PorteC. (2005). Trace metal concentration, antioxidant enzyme activities and susceptibility to oxidative stress in the tricoptera larvae Hydropsyche exocellata from the Llobregat river basin (NE Spain). Aquat. Toxicol.74, 3–19. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.04.002
7
BeaulieuM.CostantiniD. (2014). Biomarkers of oxidative status: missing tools in conservation physiology. Conserv. Physiol.2, 1–16. 10.1093/conphys/cou014
8
BeaulieuM.MboumbaS.WillaumeE.KappelerP. M.CharpentierM. J. E. (2014). The oxidative cost of unstable social dominance. J. Exp. Biol.217, 2629–2632. 10.1242/jeb.104851
9
BlountJ. D. (2004). Carotenoids and life-history evolution in animals. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.430, 10–15. 10.1016/j.abb.2004.03.039
10
BlountJ. D.MetcalfeN. B.BirkheadT. R.SuraiP. F. (2003). Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. Science300, 125–127. 10.1126/science.1082142
11
BonoR.BellisarioV.RomanazziV.PirroV.PiccioniP.PazziM.et al. (2014). Oxidative stress in adolescent passive smokers living in urban and rural environments. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health217, 287–293. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.06.008
12
BradburyJ.VehrencampS. (2011). Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd Edn.Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc.
13
Bro-JørgensenJ. (2010). Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. Trends Ecol. Evol.25, 292–300. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.003
14
BuchananK. L.LeitnerS.SpencerK. A.GoldsmithA. R.CatchpoleC. K. (2004). Developmental stress selectively affects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch. Proc. R. Soc. B271, 2381–2386. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2874
15
CandolinU. (1999). The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback?Anim. Behav.58, 1261–1267. 10.1006/anbe.1999.1259
16
ConsalesC.MerlaC.MarinoC.BenassiB. (2012). Electromagnetic fields, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. Int. J. Cell Biol.2012, 1–16. 10.1155/2012/683897
17
CostaB.RohdeC.ValenteV. (2003). Temperature, urbanization and body color polymorphism in South Brazilian populations of Drosophila kikkawai (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Iheringia Ser. Zool.93, 381–393. 10.1590/S0073-47212003000400005
18
CostantiniD. (2010). Redox physiology in animal function: the struggle of living in an oxidant environment. Curr. Zool.56, 687–702. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01746.x
19
CostantiniD. (2016). Oxidative stress ecology and the d-ROMs test: facts, misfacts and an appraisal of a decade's work. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.70, 809–820. 10.1007/s00265-016-2091-5
20
CostantiniD.GreivesT. J.HauM.ParteckeJ. (2014). Does urban life change blood oxidative status in birds?J. Exp. Biol.217, 2994–2997. 10.1242/jeb.106450
21
CostantiniD.RoweM.ButlerM. W.McGrawK. J. (2010). From molecules to living systems: historical and contemporary issues in oxidative stress and antioxidant ecology. Funct. Ecol.24, 950–959. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01746.x
22
CostelloR. A.SymesL. B. (2014). Effects of anthropogenic noise on male signalling behaviour and female phonotaxis in Oecanthus tree crickets. Anim. Behav.95, 15–22. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.009
23
CragoJ.CorsiS. R.WeberD.BannermanR.KlaperR. (2011). Linking biomarkers to reproductive success of caged fathead minnows in streams with increasing urbanization. Chemosphere82, 1669–1674. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.011
24
DemirelR.AkkayaM.UygurR. (2009). Noise induces oxidative stress in rat. Eur. J. Gen. Med.6, 20–24.
25
DominoniD. M.GoymannW.HelmB.ParteckeJ. (2013). Urban-like night illumination reduces melatonin release in European blackbirds (Turdus merula): implications of city life for biological time-keeping of songbirds. Front. Zool.10:60. 10.1186/1742-9994-10-60
26
DowlingJ. L.LutherD. A.MarraP. P. (2012). Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs. Behav. Ecol.23, 201–209. 10.1093/beheco/arr176
27
FalfushinskaH.LoumbourdisN.RomanchukL.StolyarO. (2008). Validation of oxidative stress responses in two populations of frogs from Western Ukraine. Chemosphere73, 1096–1101. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.060
28
FalfushinskaH. I.RomanchukL. D.StolyarO. B. (2008). Different responses of biochemical markers in frogs (Rana ridibunda) from urban and rural wetlands to the effect of carbamate fungicide. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C148, 223–229. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.05.018
29
Fernández-JuricicE.PostonR.De CollibusK.MorganT.BastainB.MartinC.et al. (2005). Microhabitat selection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape in the western U.S. Urban Habitats3, 49–69.
30
FinkelT. (2003). Oxidant signals and oxidative stress. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.15, 247–254. 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00002-4
31
FinkelT.HolbrookN. J. (2000). Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature408, 239–247. 10.1038/35041687
32
GarrattM.BrooksR. C. (2012). Oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals: more than just seeing red. Proc. R. Soc. B279, 3121–3130. 10.1098/rspb.2012.0568
33
GarrattM.PichaudN.GlarosE. N.KeeA. J.BrooksR. C. (2014). Superoxide dismutase deficiency impairs olfactory sexual signaling and alters bioenergetic function in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111, 8119–8124. 10.1073/pnas.1322282111
34
GilD.HonarmandM.PascualJ.Perez-MenaE.Macias GarciaC. (2015). Birds living near airports advance their dawn chorus and reduce overlap with aircraft noise. Behav. Ecol.26, 435–443. 10.1093/beheco/aru207
35
GiraudeauM.McGrawK. J. (2014). Physiological correlates of urbanization in a desert songbird. Integr. Comp. Biol.54, 622–632. 10.1093/icb/icu024
36
GiraudeauM.ChavezA.ToomeyM. B.McGrawK. J. (2015). Effects of carotenoid supplementation and oxidative challenges on physiological parameters and carotenoid-based coloration in an urbanization context. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.69, 957–970. 10.1007/s00265-015-1908-y
37
GiraudeauM.MouselM.EarlS.McGrawK. (2014a). Parasites in the city: degree of urbanization predicts poxvirus and coccidian infections in house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus). PLoS ONE9:e86747. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086747
38
GiraudeauM.NolanP. M.BlackC. E.EarlS. R.HasegawaM.McGrawK. J. (2014b). Song characteristics track bill morphology along a gradient of urbanization in house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus). Front. Zool.11:8. 10.1186/s12983-014-0083-8
39
HahsA. K.EvansK. L. (2015). Expanding fundamental ecological knowledge by studying urban ecosystems. Funct. Ecol.29, 863–867. 10.1111/1365-2435.12488
40
HalfwerkW.BotS.BuikxJ.van der VeldeM.KomdeurJ.ten CateC.et al. (2011). Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 14549–14554. 10.1073/pnas.1109091108
41
HamiltonW. D.ZukM. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?Science218, 384–387. 10.1126/science.7123238
42
HasegawaM.LigonR. A.GiraudeauM.WatanabeM.McGrawK. J. (2014). Urban and colorful male house finches are less aggressive. Behav. Ecol.25, 641–649. 10.1093/beheco/aru034
43
HenschenA. E.WhittinghamL. A.DunnP. O. (2015). Oxidative stress is related to both melanin and carotenoid-based ornaments in the common yellowthroat. Funct. Ecol.10.1111/1365-2435.12549. [Epub ahead of print].
44
Herrera-DueñasA.PinedaJ.AntonioM. T.AguirreJ. I. (2014). Oxidative stress of house sparrow as bioindicator of urban pollution. Ecol. Indic.42, 6–9. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.08.014
45
HillG. E. (1993). Geographic variation in the carotenoid plumage pigmentation of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). Biol. J. Linn. Soc.49, 63–86.
46
HillG. E. (1995). Ornamental traits as indicators of environmental health. BioScience45, 25–31.
47
HõrakP.OtsI.VellauH.SpottiswoodeC.MøllerA. P. (2001). Carotenoid-based plumage coloration reflects hemoparasite infection and local survival in breeding great tits. Oecologia126, 166–173. 10.1007/s004420000513
48
HõrakP.SuraiP. F.MøllerA. P. (2002). Fat-soluble antioxidants in the eggs of great tits Parus major in relation to breeding habitat and laying sequence. Avian Sci.2, 123–130.
49
HõrakP.SuraiP. F.OtsI.MøllerA. P. (2004). Fat soluble antioxidants in brood-rearing great tits Parus major: relations to health and appearance. J. Avian Biol.35, 63–70. 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03167.x
50
HõrakP.VellauH.OtsI.MøllerA. P. (2000). Growth conditions affect carotenoid-based plumage coloration of great tit neslings. Naturwissenschaften87, 460–464. 10.1007/s001140050759
51
HuY.CardosoG. C. (2010). Which birds adjust the frequency of vocalizations in urban noise?Anim. Behav.79, 863–867. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.036
52
HuttonP.LigonR. A.McGrawK. J.SeymoureB. M.SimpsonR. K. (2015). Dynamic color communication. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci.6, 41–49. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.08.007
53
IsakssonC. (2009). The chemical pathway of carotenoids: from plants to birds. Ardea97, 125–128. 10.5253/078.097.0116
54
IsakssonC. (2010). Pollution and its impact on wild animals: a meta-analysis on oxidative stress. EcoHealth7, 342–350. 10.1007/s10393-010-0345-7
55
IsakssonC. (2015). Urbanization, oxidative stress and inflammation: a question of evolving, acclimatizing or coping with urban environmental stress. Funct. Ecol.29, 913–923. 10.1111/1365-2435.12477
56
IsakssonC.AnderssonS. (2007). Carotenoid diet and nestling provisioning in urban and rural great tits Parus major. J. Avian Biol.38, 564–572. 10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.04030.x
57
IsakssonC.JohanssonA.AnderssonS. (2008). Egg yolk carotenoids in relation to habitat and reproductive investment in the great tit Parus major. Physiol. Biochem. Zool.81, 112–118. 10.1086/522650
58
IsakssonC.McLaughlinP.MonaghanP.AnderssonS. (2007a). Carotenoid pigmentation does not reflect total non-enzymatic antioxidant activity in plasma of adult and nestling great tits, Parus major. Funct. Ecol.21, 1123–1129. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01317.x
59
IsakssonC.ÖrnborgJ.StephensenE.AnderssonS. (2005). Plasma glutathione and carotenoid coloration as potential biomarkers of environmental stress in great tits. EcoHealth2, 138–146. 10.1007/s10393-005-3869-5
60
IsakssonC.Von PostM.AnderssonS. (2007b). Sexual, seasonal, and environmental variation in plasma carotenoids in great tits, Parus major. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.92, 521–527. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00852.x
61
JacquinL.LenouvelP.HaussyC.DucatezS.GaspariniJ. (2011). Melanin-based coloration is related to parasite intensity and cellular immune response in an urban free living bird: the feral pigeon Columba livia. J. Avian Biol.42, 11–15. 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.05120.x
62
JanssensL.StoksR. (2013). Predation risk causes oxidative damage in prey. Biol. Lett.9:20130350. 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0350
63
JasinskaE. J.GossG. G.GillisP. L.Van Der KraakG. J.MatsumotoJ.de Souza MachadoA. A.et al. (2015). Assessment of biomarkers for contaminants of emerging concern on aquatic organisms downstream of a municipal wastewater discharge. Sci. Total Environ. 530–531, 140–153. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.080
64
JonesT. M.RodewaldA. D.ShustackD. P. (2010). Variation in plumage coloration of northern cardinals in urbanizing landscapes. Wilson J. Ornithol.122, 326–333. 10.1676/09-082.1
65
KightC. R.SwaddleJ. P. (2015). Eastern bluebirds alter their song in response to anthropogenic changes in the acoustic environment. Integr. Comp. Biol.55:icv070. 10.1093/icb/icv070
66
KramarenkoS. S.KhokhutkinI. M.GrebennikovM. E. (2007). Specific features of phenetic structure of the terrestrial snail Cepaea vindobonensis (Pulmonata; Helicidae) in urbanized and natural populations. Russ. J. Ecol.38, 39–45. 10.1134/S1067413607010079
67
KulczykowskaE.KasprzakM.KalamarzH.KuriataM.NietrzebaM.JerzakL.et al. (2007). Melatonin and thyroxine response to pollution in white stork nestlings (Ciconia ciconia): aspects of rhythmicity and age. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C146, 392–397. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.04.012
68
LampeU.ReinholdK.SchmollT. (2014). How grasshoppers respond to road noise: developmental plasticity and population differentiation in acoustic signalling. Funct. Ecol.28, 660–668. 10.1111/1365-2435.12215
69
LampeU.SchmollT.FranzkeA.ReinholdK. (2012). Staying tuned: grasshoppers from noisy roadside habitats produce courtship signals with elevated frequency components. Funct. Ecol.26, 1348–1354. 10.1111/1365-2435.12000
70
LazerteS. E.OtterK. A.SlabbekoornH. (2015). Relative effects of ambient noise and habitat openness on signal transfer for chickadee vocalizations in rural and urban green-spaces. Bioacoustics24, 233–252. 10.1080/09524622.2015.1060531
71
LeonE.BeltzerA.QuirogaM. (2014). The Saffron finch (Sicalis flaveola) modifies its vocalizations to adapt to urban habitats. Rev. Mex. Biodivers.85, 546–552. 10.7550/rmb.32123
72
LionettoM. G.CaricatoR.GiordanoM. E.PascarielloM. F.MarinosciL.SchettinoT. (2003). Integrated use of biomarkers (acetylcholinesterase and antioxidant enzymes activities) in Mytilus galloprovincialis and Mullus barbatus in an Italian coastal marine area. Mar. Pollut. Bull.46, 324–330. 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00403-4
73
LowryH.LillA.WongB. B. M. (2012). How noisy does a noisy miner have to be? Amplitude adjustments of alarm calls in an avian urban adapter. PLoS ONE7:e29960. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029960
74
LucasL. D.FrenchS. S. (2012). Stress-induced tradeoffs in a free-living lizard across a variable landscape: consequences for individuals and populations. PLoS ONE7:e49895. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049895
75
MassaroM.DavisL. S.DarbyJ. T. (2003). Carotenoid-derived ornaments reflect parental quality in male and female yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.55, 169–175. 10.1007/s00265-003-0683-3
76
Maynard SmithJ.HarperD. (2003). Animal Signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77
McDonnellM. J.HahsA. K. (2015). Adaptation and adaptedness of organisms to urban environments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.46, 261–280. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054258
78
MockfordE. J.MarshallR. C. (2009). Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits. Proc. R. Soc. B276, 2979–2985. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0586
79
MøllerA. P.ErritzøeJ.KaradasF. (2010). Levels of antioxidants in rural and urban birds and their consequences. Oecologia163, 35–45. 10.1007/s00442-009-1525-4
80
NarangoD. L.RodewaldA. D. (2016). Urban-associated drivers of song variation along a rural–urban gradient. Behav. Ecol.27, 608–616. 10.1093/beheco/arv197
81
NavaraK. J.NelsonR. J. (2007). The dark side of light at night: physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences. J. Pineal Res.43, 215–224. 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2007.00473.x
82
NowickiS.SearcyW. A.PetersS. (2002). Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the nutritional stress hypothesis. J. Comp. Physiol. A188, 1003–1014. 10.1007/s00359-002-0361-3
83
ObukhovaN. Y. (2007). Polymorphism and phene geography of the blue rock pigeon in Europe. Russ. J. Genet.43, 492–501. 10.1134/S1022795407050031
84
ObukhovaN. Y. (2011). Dynamics of balanced polymorphism morphs in blue rock pigeon Columbia livia. Russ. J. Genet.47, 83–89. 10.1134/S1022795411010078
85
ParrisK. M.Velik-LordM.NorthJ. M. A. (2009). Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecol. Soc.14, 25.
86
PotvinD. A.MulderR. A. (2013). Immediate, independent adjustment of call pitch and amplitude in response to varying background noise by silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Behav. Ecol.24, 1363–1368. 10.1093/beheco/art075
87
PotvinD. A.MulderR. A.ParrisK. M. (2014). Silvereyes decrease acoustic frequency but increase efficacy of alarm calls in urban noise. Anim. Behav.98, 27–33. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.026
88
PotvinD. A.ParrisK. M. (2012). Song convergence in multiple urban populations of silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Ecol. Evol.2, 1977–1984. 10.1002/ece3.320
89
PrakeshI.IdrisM.KumariS. (1998). Scent marking behaviour of three desert rodents. Proc. Indian Natl. Acad. Sci.64, 319–334.
90
QvarnströmA.PärtT.SheldonB. C. (2000). Adaptive plasticity in mate preference linked to differences in reproductive effort. Nature405, 344–347. 10.1038/35012605
91
RedondoP.BarrantesG.SandovalL. (2013). Urban noise influences vocalization structure in the House Wren Troglodytes aedon. Ibis155, 621–625. 10.1111/ibi.12053
92
Ríos-ChelénA. A.LeeG. C.PatricelliG. L. (2015). Anthropogenic noise is associated with changes in acoustic but not visual signals in red-winged blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.69, 1139–1151. 10.1007/s00265-015-1928-7
93
Ríos-ChelénA. A.Quirós-GuerreroE.GilD.Macías GarciaC. (2013). Dealing with urban noise: vermilion flycatchers sing longer songs in noisier territories. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.67, 145–152. 10.1007/s00265-012-1434-0
94
RipmeesterE. A. P.MulderM.SlabbekoornH. (2010). Habitat-dependent acoustic divergence affects playback response in urban and forest populations of the European blackbird. Behav. Ecol.21, 876–883. 10.1093/beheco/arq075
95
RobertsonB. A.RehageJ. S.SihA. (2013). Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol. Evol.28, 552–560. 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.004
96
RobinsonM. R.PilkingtonJ. G.Clutton-BrockT. H.PembertonJ. M.KruukL. E. B. (2008). Environmental heterogeneity generates fluctuating selection on a secondary sexual trait. Curr. Biol.18, 751–757. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.059
97
RodewaldA. D.ShustackD. P.JonesT. M. (2011). Dynamic selective environments and evolutionary traps in human-dominated landscapes. Ecology92, 1781–1788. 10.1890/11-0022.1
98
Seger-FullamK.RodewaldA.SohaJ. (2011). Urban noise predicts song frequency in northern cardinals and American robins. Bioacoustics20, 267–276. 10.1080/09524622.2011.9753650
99
SeifriedH. E.AndersonD. E.FisherE. I.MilnerJ. A. (2007). A review of the interaction among dietary antioxidants and reactive oxygen species. J. Nutr. Biochem.18, 567–579. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2006.10.007
100
SenarJ. C.ConroyM. J.QuesadaJ.Mateos-GonzalezF. (2014). Selection based on the size of the black tie of the great tit may be reversed in urban habitats. Ecol. Evol.4, 2625–2632. 10.1002/ece3.999
101
ShiehB.SenL.iang, S. H.ChenC. C.LoaH. H.LiaoC. Y. (2012). Acoustic adaptations to anthropogenic noise in the cicada Cryptotympana takasagona Kato (Hemiptera: Cicadidae). Acta Ethol.15, 33–38. 10.1007/s10211-011-0105-x
102
SkarphedinsdottirH.HallgrimssonG. T.HanssonT.HägerrothP.-A. Å.LiewenborgB.TjärnlundU.et al. (2010). Genotoxicity in herring gulls (Larus argentatus) in Sweden and Iceland. Mutat. Res.702, 24–31. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.07.002
103
SlabbekoornH.YehP.HuntK. (2007). Sound transmission and song divergence: a comparison of urban and forest acoustics. Condor109, 67–78. 10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109
104
StewartA. J. A.LeesD. R. (1996). The Colour/Pattern Polymorphism of Philaenus spumarius (L.) (Homoptera: Cercopidae) in England and Wales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B351, 69–89. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0005
105
StoddardP. K. (2002). The evolutionary origins of electric signal complexity. J. Physiol.96, 485–491. 10.1016/S0928-4257(03)00004-4
106
Suárez-RodríguezM.Macías GarciaC. (2014). There is no such a thing as a free cigarette; lining nests with discarded butts brings short-term benefits, but causes toxic damage. J. Evol. Biol.27, 2719–2726. 10.1111/jeb.12531
107
SvenssonP. A.WongB. B. M. (2011). Carotenoid-based signals in behavioural ecology: a review. Behaviour148, 131–189. 10.1163/000579510X548673
108
TinghitellaR. M.ZukM. (2009). Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal. Evolution63, 2087–2098. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00698.x
109
TomášekO.GabrielováB.KačerP.MaršíkP.SvobodováJ.SyslováK.et al. (2016). Opposing effects of oxidative challenge and carotenoids on antioxidant status and condition-dependent sexual signalling. Sci. Rep.6:23546. 10.1038/srep23546
110
TringaliA.BowmanR. (2015). Suburban immigrants to wildlands disrupt honest signaling in ultra-violet plumage. Avian Conserv. Ecol.10:9. 10.5751/ACE-00746-100109
111
TroïanowskiM.DumetA.CondetteC.LengagneT.MondyN. (2015). Traffic noise affects colouration but not calls in the European treefrog (Hyla arborea). Behaviour152, 821–836. 10.1163/1568539X-00003255
112
van der VlietA.BastA. (1992). Effect of oxidative stress on receptors and signal transmission. Chem. Biol. Interact.85, 95–116.
113
VenancioL. P. R.SilvaM. I. A.da SilvaT. L.MoschettaV. A. G.de Campos ZuccariD. A. P.AlmeidaE. A.et al. (2013). Pollution-induced metabolic responses in hypoxia-tolerant freshwater turtles. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.97, 1–9. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.06.035
114
von SchantzT.BenschS.GrahnM.HasselquistD.WittzellH. (1999). Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proc. R. Soc. B266, 1–12. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0597
115
WalkerL. K.StevensM.KaradaşF.KilnerR. M.EwenJ. G. (2013). A window on the past: male ornamental plumage reveals the quality of their early-life environment. Proc. Biol. Sci.280:20122852. 10.1098/rspb.2012.2852
116
WhittakerD. J.SoiniH. A.AtwellJ. W.HollarsC.NovotnyM. V.KettersonE. D. (2010). Songbird chemosignals: volatile compounds in preen gland secretions vary among individuals, sexes, and populations. Behav. Ecol.21, 608–614. 10.1093/beheco/arq033
117
WoodW. E.YezerinacS. M. (2006). Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. Auk123, 650–659. 10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[650:SSMMSV]2.0.CO;2
118
YangX.SlabbekoornH. (2014). Timing vocal behaviour: lack of temporal overlap avoidance to fluctuating noise levels in singing Eurasian wrens. Behav. Process.108, 131–137. 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.002
119
YehP. J. (2004). Rapid evolution of a sexually selected trait following population establishment in a novel habitat. Evolution58, 166–174. 10.1554/03-182
120
ZukM.RotenberryJ. T.TinghitellaR. M. (2006). Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol. Lett.2, 521–524. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0539
Summary
Keywords
antioxidants, animal communication, dishonest signals, oxidative stress, pro-oxidants, signal honesty, urbanization
Citation
Hutton P and McGraw KJ (2016) Urban Impacts on Oxidative Balance and Animal Signals. Front. Ecol. Evol. 4:54. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00054
Received
30 January 2016
Accepted
26 April 2016
Published
19 May 2016
Volume
4 - 2016
Edited by
David Costantini, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Reviewed by
Stefania Casagrande, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Germany; Amparo Herrera-Dueñas, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2016 Hutton and McGraw.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pierce Hutton pierce.hutton@asu.edu
This article was submitted to Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.