Kindness to the Final Host and Vice Versa: A Trend for Parasites Providing Easy Prey?

Abstract

Traditionally the “extended phenotype” concept refers to parasites that manipulate host phenotype to increase parasite fitness. This includes parasites that render intermediate hosts more susceptible to predation by final hosts. We explore here the proposition that an evolutionary driver in such cases is the energetic benefit to the final host, in addition to increased parasite fitness. We will review some well-established host-manipulation models, where such a scenario seems likely. One example is provided by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, which conspicuously impairs predator avoidance in rodents. Pathologies in humans that acquire T. gondii are known, but infection in adult feline definitive hosts are most commonly asymptomatic and apparently innocuous. In another well-documented case of parasite-mediated trophic transmission, trematode (Euhaplorchis californiensis) infected killifish (Fundulus parvipinnis) abandon normal caution and exhibit a range of behaviors which makes them more conspicuous to predatory birds. The birds get a free meal, but the presence of adult trematodes in the gut would seem to incur few if any negative consequences for the birds. There are exceptions to this pattern also among cases of parasite mediated trophic transmission, but major pathology in definitive hosts seems for the most part restricted to cases where manipulated intermediate hosts are of minor energetic importance. Current theories for the evolution of reduced pathogenicity in predatory final hosts primarily focus on parasites minimizing pathogenicity to increase their own reproductive output and/or avoid selection on host preference for non-infected prey types. Here we advocate another alternative: If or when the benefit of increased prey acquisition outweighs pathogenicity or resource drain, there should be little or no selection on final hosts to minimize parasite infections. This means that not only will host avoidance of infection not develop, but the molecular arms race for increased immunological defense will also likely be halted in such cases.

Introduction: Parasites and the Evolving Immune System

Multicellular animals achieve defense against other, disease-causing organisms by means of a range of complex immune responses. Analogously as to how the highly complex vertebrate nervous system evolved from much simpler signaling systems, the immune system evolved from simpler defense mechanisms. The evolutionary mechanisms involved are a topic of intense study (Kaufman, 2010; Rich and Chaplin, 2019). This quest reflects the fundamental interest in long-term co-evolutionary arms races between parasites and pathogens and their hosts (Decaestecker et al., 2007; Brockhurst et al., 2014), as well as the need to understand the rapidly developing multitude of immune related diseases in the human population (Dunne and Cooke, 2005; Allen and Maizels, 2011; Levine et al., 2011). For the most part, interest has been directed into how the immune system detects and fights invaders, and how these invaders in turn develop infectivity by avoiding detection and attack (Woolhouse et al., 2002; Paterson et al., 2010; Hall et al., 2011; Laanto et al., 2017). In a majority of studies, focus is placed on the conflict between hosts and their parasites and pathogens, and the resulting evolutionary arms race. In an ecological context, however, roles of different interacting species cannot be strictly limited to the traditional definitions of parasitic or mutualistic (Betts et al., 2016).

Species of parasites, which inhabit and utilize different host species for different purposes during their life cycle, will have contrasting effects on hosts depending on both transmission stage and host as well as parasite developmental stage (Parker et al., 2009; Dianne et al., 2011; Weinreich et al., 2013). Parasites occupying multiple sequential host species appear as appropriate model systems for variable nature of host-parasite relationship. Parasites may be beneficial in certain contexts (Thomas et al., 2000), for instance protecting their hosts from either predation or disease (Methot and Alizon, 2014; Gopko et al., 2015), and recent publications analyze how parasites may evolve to protect their hosts (Ashby and King, 2017). Here we will suggest that the ability of parasites to potentiate host fitness also by indirect extended phenotype effects could be an overlooked but potent evolutionary driver in shaping the host immune response.

We focus in this review on cases of co-existence without fierce resistance, in other words when an organism reside in the body of another species without apparent negative consequences. Understanding the biology behind such conditions could potentially provide clues to combatting over-activation and resulting immunopathologies.

Host and Parasite Perspectives

Pinnacles for the evolution and ontogenetic unfolding of virulence and pathogenicity vs. benign interactions has been addressed previously by multiple authors (Ewald, 1987, 1995; May and Anderson, 1990; Anderson and May, 1992; Nowak and May, 1994; Combes, 2001). A parasite infection will generally evoke an immune response in the host, and parasite species with complicated life cycles need to overcome a variety of immune defenses from multiple hosts, often of both vertebrate and invertebrate origin (Auld and Tinsley, 2015). For example, if completion of the life cycle requires sickening or conspicuousness of an intermediate host, but health and longevity of the final host, pathogenicity needs to be adjusted accordingly. To complicate things further, a parasite might have different purposes even in the same host depending on its developmental stage. For example, a parasite awaiting trophic transmission but is not yet infective for its next host, could be expected to minimize damage and seek to extend the life span of an intermediate host. When the parasite matures and becomes infective for the next host, however, its infection mechanism may change with adverse consequences for the host (Parker et al., 2009; Dianne et al., 2011; Weinreich et al., 2013). Thus, parasites may adjust their virulence to match their life history strategy and stage. An example of such a strategy is provided by the cestode Schistocephalus solidus, plerocercoids of which reduce anti-predator behavior of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) only when infective to the final host, piscivorous birds (Tierney et al., 1993).

Parasites may reduce or even enhance longevity and survival of the host depending on what is the most adaptive outcome for them (Hammerschmidt et al., 2009; Dianne et al., 2012). Hosts, in turn will adjust their response to maximize expected life time fitness. Hence, hosts may have very different degrees of incentives for fighting off the parasite and accordingly invest in immunity.

From the perspective of the host, in particular regarding parasites manipulating host phenotype, the evolutionary pressures for parasite resistance may be highly variable (Poulin et al., 1994). In short, a host that suffers from manipulation by the parasite in a way that only benefits the parasite could be expected to develop a strong immune response compared to a host that do not suffer considerably. But even in hosts that do not directly benefit or even that severely suffer from infection, there is a trade-off between keeping the parasite infection in check and avoiding potential immunopatholoical costs and even mortality associated with immune reactivity (i.e., autoimmunity) (Graham et al., 2005; Maizels, 2016). Of note, heavy investment in immune responses obviously also goes at the expense of investment in other imperative traits, such as growth (Soler et al., 2003; Brommer, 2004) and reproduction (Gustafsson et al., 1994; Nordling et al., 1998; Siva-Jothy et al., 1998).

In the following we introduce a hitherto overlooked factor that may limit the immune response of end hosts, namely the energetic/nutritional benefit of prey rendered easily captured because of infections. By now, a multitude of examples have been described where parasite-associated changes in the phenotype of intermediate hosts appear to facilitate trophic transmission. In many cases it would appear that the final host indeed benefits from the presence of a certain parasite, and would gain little from eliminating it. A close scrutiny of current literature reveals few reports of apparent pathology or other negative fitness effects on the end host in such systems (see Table 1).

Parasites Providing Easy Prey

Many parasite life cycles include a stage at which successful transmission requires that an infected host must be ingested by a predator, which then becomes host for the next -and often final- life stage of the parasite. Specifically regarding such trophically transmitted parasites, it can be predicted that pathology should be low in the final predatory host, otherwise a negative fitness effect would select for avoidance of parasitized prey (Lafferty, 1992; Kuris, 2003). Scenarios where different hosts in a trophically transmitted life cycle is impacted differently (Kuris, 2003), and in which the host actually benefits from interaction with the parasite have been proposed by several authors (Lafferty, 1992; Thomas et al., 2000). Lafferty (1992) proposed a model that weighed energetic costs of parasitism for a predator against the energetic value of infected prey items, which revealed that there is often no selective pressure to avoid parasitized prey. In other words, predators may actually benefit from their parasites if energetic costs of parasitism are moderate and prey capture is facilitated by parasites. Such hosts are likely to be under strong selection to avoid colonization by some, but not all, parasites.

Numerous reports have documented that parasite infected animals may change their behavior in ways that increase parasite fitness [e.g., Holmes and Bethel, 1972; Barber et al., 2000; Poulin, 2010; Lafferty and Shaw, 2013; Moore, 2013]. Following empirical demonstrations that amphipods harboring larval acanthocephalan parasites display behavior and abnormal coloration making them more susceptible to predation by the parasite's next host (Hindsbo, 1972; Holmes and Bethel, 1972), there has been sustained interest in this phenomenon. As a result, host manipulation by parasites has now been documented in a few hundred distinct host–parasite associations spanning all major phyla of living organisms (see reviews in Moore, 2002, 2013; Dawkins, 2012). Remarkable examples include “suicidal” behavior in rats infected by the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii, which become attracted to cat urine (Berdoy et al., 2000), and water-seeking behavior in otherwise terrestrial crickets which allow parasitic hairworms to emerge and reproduce in water (Thomas et al., 2002). Interest in this field has taken a leap as new molecular and systems biology approaches are revealing the potential impact of parasites and pathogens on behavior and neurobiology both in natural ecosystems and in the human society (Biron et al., 2006; Lefèvre et al., 2009; Prandovszky et al., 2011; Biron and Loxdale, 2013; Flegr, 2015; Syn et al., 2018).

In the following we will focus on trophically transmitted parasites, which are associated with altered behavior, appearance, or general condition of prey hosts in ways that increase their rates of consumption by predatory final hosts (see reviews by Moore, 2002; Lefèvre et al., 2009; Lafferty and Shaw, 2013). In such cases, increased predation success per effort for the final host may imply a fitness advantage, given that the cost of parasitism is low. Such cases are of particular interest for the evolution of tolerance vs. pathogenicity (Kuris, 2003). To our knowledge, however, no systematic review exists that specifically investigates if parasites that are benign to the predatory host outnumber pathogenic ones among known examples of parasite mediated trophic transmission.

As will be proposed in this review, in such cases there also exists a selection pressure for minimizing the immune response to ward off beneficial infections. This stance is derived from those cases where an energetic benefit to the final host has been either demonstrated or strongly incurred by empirical data on catchability or behavior of infected prey. In an extensive review, Lafferty and Shaw (2013) identified 55 genera of trophically transmitted parasites meeting this criterion distributed among the following taxa: protozoans, acanthocephalans, nematodes, and digenean and cestode species in the platyhelminthes phylum. In the present paper, we aimed to investigate if any significant pathology has been reported among final hosts in at least one example from each of these genera. In addition, Poulin and Maure (2015) identified 26 host–parasite species combinations for which actual predation tests had been performed, which all were included. We however omit examples involving the ingestion of organisms that cannot be considered as normally occurring energetically significant prey in the diet of the end host.

For example, our criteria exclude some spectacular and well-known examples of host manipulation. The antennae of snails infected with Leucochloridium trematodes become abnormally large and conspicuous to avian final hosts of the parasite. Snails do, however, not belong to the final host‘s normal diet and cannot be considered energetically important to the predatory bird (Moore, 2002). Along the same lines, ants infected by the liver fluke Dicrocoelium dendriticum climb and anchor themselves to the top of grass, presumably rendering them more susceptible to ingestion by large herbivorous mammals where the fluke can reach adulthood. Evidently, Dicrocelium metacercaria are associated with a dramatic behavioral change in the ants, but the insects are not of any known nutritional value to the ruminant host. Interestingly, the Dicrocoelium example provides a case where host manipulation is associated with significant pathology in the final host, i.e., the disease known as dicrocoeliosis in ruminants (Otranto and Traversa, 2003). As a contrary example from a by now classical model system, cystacanths of the acantocephalon Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus alters sheltering and light-dark preference in isopods rendering them more prone to capture by birds. Effects of adult P. cylindraceus on the model host, starlings, are however reported to be typically minor (Moore, 1983b; Moore and Bell, 1983a; Connors and Nickol, 1991). Although some metabolic cost may be incurred (Connors and Nickol, 1991), tissue damage is minimal, and infected birds in the wild exhibit weights comparable to those of uninfected conspecifics (Moore and Bell, 1983a). Pathological reactions are on the other hand common among unintended hosts and in vector borne and direct life cycles. In Table 1 we list the trophic transmission model systems that we identified as relevant in this context, and whether or not any associated pathology have been reported in the final host.

Of note, host modification does not necessarily need to include only strictly defined behavioral manipulation. The larval tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus for instance incapacitate ungulate intermediate hosts, such as moose by lodging in the lungs and other organs making it easier for wolves to attack the debilitated prey (Joly and Messier, 2004). The result for the end host is the same as with behavioral manipulation, the prey becomes easier to catch. In fact, mathematical models has been published which identify potential situations where wolves could not persist on moose as prey without the assistance of the debilitating parasite (Hadeler and Freedman, 1989). At least it seems likely that presence of the tapeworm enables wolves to drive the moose population to lower levels than would otherwise be possible. Canid final hosts, however, show no pathological responses to the adult tapeworm (Lafferty and Kuris, 2012).

In general, going through the literature on model systems where parasites presumably provide an easy meal to their final host by manipulating their prey (Table 1), it is curious to note the lack of reports on pathology in final hosts. In examples where reports on pathology do exist, local and moderate histopathological changes are described. In a very few cases parasitism appears to affect growth and condition of the final host (Boyce, 1979; Vandegrift and Hudson, 2009; Sheath, 2016). Even in these cases pathological effects are primarily reported in either non-preferred (Sheath, 2016) or very young (Boyce, 1979) final hosts, or with co-infections of other parasites so that causality between parasite species and host effects cannot easily be established (Vandegrift and Hudson, 2009). There are also cases in our literature review where parasitism is potentially lethal. For example, the nematode Dispharynx nasuta is associated with morbidity and mortality in several bird species that can serve as final hosts for the parasite (Goble and Kutz, 1945; Lindquist and Strafuss, 1980; Blasdel and Lasswell, 1986). It can, however, be debated whether the intermediate host in this case, the isopod Armadillidium vulgare, represent an energetically important food item for these birds. Nonetheless, there are exceptions to the rule that parasites providing easy prey are non-pathogenic to and not fiercely resisted by the final host, but the general trend appears to be one of benign tolerance.

Also of note, severity of pathology and mortality appears to be highly parasite density-dependent. Often, pathology is only observed with heavy infection load and moderate infections appears to be of little pathological consequence (Mazzi and Bakker, 2003; Teimoori et al., 2011). For instance, Hindsbo et al. (1982) found that immunological responses of rats to the cestode Hymenolepis diminuta are dose-dependent, indicating that the rodents tolerate a certain number of adult cestodes (up to 100 worms) before they mount an immune response. The underlying mechanisms behind such dose-dependent infection tolerance are unknown, but in the context of this review, it is tempting to point out that H. diminuta apparently provide easy to capture beetle prey for the rat final hosts. Said hosts may therefore have evolved to tolerate moderate or even substantial infection loads, ensuring survival of prey-providing parasites.

Of note, one parasite taxon appears to provoke more harm to their final host than the other taxa investigated here. In general, acanthocephalans only cause localized pathology in the gut of their hosts, but there are some reports of severe pathology. The severity of damage acanthocephalans cause to their hosts and intensity of host reactions appears to depend on the depth of proboscis penetration, the density of worm burdens and even on the systematic affiliation of the parasites and hosts (Taraschewski, 2000). Of note, those acantocephalan species that are reported to be most intensely pathogenic to their final host are not among the prey providers identified in Table 1 (for extensive review on pathogenicity of acantacephalans see Taraschewski, 2000).

Extending the Extended Phenotype Concept

The “extended phenotype” concept promoted by Richard Dawkins implies that parasites have evolved means to alter host phenotype in ways that benefit the parasite. Increased parasite fitness has been seen as the main evolutionary driver. For instance, Poulin (2010) states “In a nutshell, host manipulation by parasite can be defined as any alteration in host phenotype, induced by a parasite that has fitness benefits for the parasite.” Even Dawkins (in the editorial introduction to the 2012 book “Host Manipulation by Parasites”) proclaims that the parasite is “… manipulating the behavior of its host-subverting it to the benefit of the parasite in ways that arouse admiration for the subtlety, and horror at the ruthlessness, in equal measure” (Dawkins, 2012). Presently, we will raise the proposition that in cases of parasite-mediated trophic transmission the possibility that the energetic benefit of the final host (e.g., a fish eating bird) is an equally or perhaps more important evolutionary driver (see Figure 1).

Figure 1

As seen above, compared to parasitized intermediate hosts that suffer increased morbidity, such as parasitic castration (Baudoin, 1975), or mortality [e.g., by predation Lafferty and Morris, 1996], reports on negative effects on intended definitive hosts are suspiciously absent. Previous authors have also suggested that this appears to be a general trend in trophic transmission (Bailey, 1975; Geraci and St. Aubin, 1987). Moreover, definitive hosts of many trophically transmitted parasites do not appear to avoid parasitized prey (Bairagi and Adak, 2015). On the contrary, predatory definitive hosts often consume disproportionately larger numbers of infected vs. uninfected individuals (Hudson et al., 1992, 1998; Lafferty and Morris, 1996; McCallum et al., 2005). For example, F. parvipinnis infected with E. californiensis display conspicuous swimming behaviors, rendering them up to 30 times more likely to be eaten by a final bird host where the parasite completes its life cycle and sexually reproduce (Lafferty and Morris, 1996). Similarly, loss of the innate aversion to cat odor in rodents infected with Toxoplasma gondii, presumably makes them more susceptible to predation by the parasite's final feline host (Webster, 2001). Whereas, T. gondii infection in adult cats is most commonly asymptomatic and considered innocuous (Elmore et al., 2010), preliminary data from our lab indicate no energetic or physiological cost of E. californiensis in bird hosts (unpublished data). In conclusion, decreased anti-predator behavior of parasitized intermediate hosts/prey, or even pro-predator behavior in some cases can fulfill the extended phenotype not only of the parasite but that of the predatory definite host.

Prey Providers Revoke the Evolutionary Arms Race

Common for the end hosts in these examples is that they do not appear to suffer the same deleterious consequences of the parasite infection as the intermediate hosts. Seen from the parasite's perspective, kindness to the final host vs. aggressive utilization of host resources could be advantageous for several reasons, in that enhanced host longevity would maximize parasite lifetime accumulated fitness. It is therefore reasonable to assume that trophically transmitted parasites could have a selective benefit from reducing their negative impact on the final host. But on the other hand, parasite mediated trophic transmission of energetically important prey is also likely to prevent the development of potentially destructive immune responses in the host, in addition to avoiding that the predatory final host evolves a tendency to avoid parasitized prey. If easily captured parasitized prey in this way fulfills the extended phenotype of not only the parasite awaiting transmission, but also that of the predator, there should be little or no selection on final hosts to minimize parasite infections. We have by no means covered an extensive list of all parasite-mediated trophic transmissions in this review, but the picture that emerges is that some predators employ parasites as a weapon in biological warfare against their prey, rather than suffering from infection in the traditional sense. This raises a pertinent question: How does the continuously developing immune system of a predatory host acquire and maintain the ability to distinguish useful helpers from pure plague? Apart from novel understanding of evolutionary drivers of host-parasite relationships, proximate understanding of these principles could potentially provide clues to combatting over-activation and resulting immunopathologies.

References

• 1

  AebyG. S. (1991). Behavioral and ecological relationships of a parasite and its hosts within a coral reef system. Pac. Sci.45, 263–269.

  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AllenJ. E.MaizelsR. M. (2011). Diversity and dialogue in immunity to helminths. Nat. Rev. Immunol.11, 375–388. 10.1038/nri2992

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AndersonR. M.MayR. M. (1992). Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AshbyB.KingK. C. (2017). Friendly foes: the evolution of host protection by a parasite. Evol. Lett.1, 211–221. 10.1002/evl3.19

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AuldS. K.TinsleyM. C. (2015). The evolutionary ecology of complex lifecycle parasites: linking phenomena with mechanisms. Heredity (Edinb).114, 125–132. 10.1038/hdy.2014.84

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  BaileyG. N. A. (1975). Energetics of a host-parasite system: a preliminary report. Int. J. Parasitol.5, 609–613. 10.1016/0020-7519(75)90059-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  BairagiN.AdakD. (2015). Complex dynamics of a predator–prey–parasite system: an interplay among infection rate, predator's reproductive gain and preference. Ecol. Complex22, 1–12. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2015.01.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BakkerT. C. M.MazziD.ZalaS. (1997). Parasite-induced changes in behavior and color make Gammarus pulex more prone to fish predation. Ecology78, 1098–1104. 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1098:PICIBA]2.0.CO;2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  BarberI.HoareD.KrauseJ. (2000). Effects of parasites on fish behaviour: a review and evolutionary perspective. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher10, 131–165. 10.1023/A:1016658224470

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BarberI.HuntingfordF. A. (1996). Parasite infection alters schooling behaviour: deviant positioning of helminth-infected minnows in conspecific groups. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B263, 1095–1102. 10.1098/rspb.1996.0161

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BarberI.SvenssonP. A.WalkerP. (2004). Behavioural responses to simulated avian predation in female three spined sticklebacks: the effect of experimental Schistocephalus solidus infections. Behaviour141:1425. 10.1163/1568539042948231

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BaudoinM. (1975). Host castration as a parasitic strategy. Evolution29, 335–352. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00213.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BeneshD. P.ValtonenE. T.SeppäläO. (2008). Multidimensionality and intra-individual variation in host manipulation by an acanthocephalan. Parasitology135, 617–626. 10.1017/S0031182008004216

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BerdoyM.WebsterJ. P.MacdonaldD. W. (2000). Fatal attraction in rats infected with Toxoplasma gondii. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.267, 1591–1594. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1182

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BerosS.JongepierE.HagemeierF.FoitzikS. (2015). The parasite's long arm: a tapeworm parasite induces behavioural changes in uninfected group members of its social host. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.282:20151473. 10.1098/rspb.2015.1473

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BethelW. M.HolmesJ. C. (1973). Altered evasive behavior and responses to light in amphipods harboring acanthocephalan cystacanths. J. Parasitol.59, 945–956. 10.2307/3278623

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  BethelW. M.HolmesJ. C. (1977). Increased vulnerability of amphipods to predation owing to altered behavior induced by larval acanthocephalans. Can. J. Zool.55, 110–115. 10.1139/z77-013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BettsA.RafalukC.KingK. C. (2016). Host and parasite evolution in a tangled bank. Trends Parasitol.32, 863–873. 10.1016/j.pt.2016.08.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  BironD. G.LoxdaleH. D. (2013). Host-parasite molecular cross-talk during the manipulative process of a host by its parasite. J. Exp. Biol.216, 148–160. 10.1242/jeb.073825

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  BironD. G.PontonF.MarchéL.GaleottiN.RenaultL.Demey-ThomasE.et al. (2006). ‘Suicide’ of crickets harbouring hairworms: a proteomics investigation. Insect Mol. Biol.15, 731–742. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00671.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  BlankespoorC.PappasP.EisnerT. (1997). Impairment of the chemical defence of the beetle, Tenebrio molitor, by metacestodes (cysticercoids) of the tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta. Parasitology115, 105–110. 10.1017/S0031182097008901

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  BlasdelT.LasswellJ. (1986). Dispharynx nasuta in the Houston zoological gardens bird collection, in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians (Chicago, IL), 101–102.

  • Google Scholar

• 23

  BoyceN. (1979). Effects of Eubothrium salvelini (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) on the growth and vitality of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can. J. Zool.57, 597–602. 10.1139/z79-070

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  BoyceN. P.ClarkeW. C. (1983). Eubothrium salvelini (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) impairs seawater adaptation of migrant Sockeye salmon Yearlings (Oncorhynchus nerka) from Babine lake, British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.40, 821–824. 10.1139/f83-108

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  BrockhurstM. A.ChapmanT.KingK. C.MankJ. E.PatersonS.HurstG. D. (2014). Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.281:20141382. 10.1098/rspb.2014.1382

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  BrommerJ. E. (2004). Immunocompetence and its costs during development: an experimental study in blue tit nestlings. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.271(Suppl. 3), S110–S113. 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0103

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  BullockW. L. (1963). Intestinal histology of some salmonid fishes with particular reference to the histopathology of acanthocephalan infections. J. Morphol.112, 23–44. 10.1002/jmor.1051120104

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  CampJ. W.HuizingaH. W. (1979). Altered color, behavior and predation susceptibility of the isopod Asellus intermedius infected with Acanthocephalus dirus. J. Parasitol.65, 667–669. 10.2307/3280340

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  CarneyW. P. (1969). Behavioral and morphological changes in carpenter ants harboring dicrocoeliid metacercariae. Am. Midl. Nat.82, 605–611. 10.2307/2423801

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  CarreonN.FaulkesZ.FredensborgB. L. (2011). Polypocephalus sp. infects the nervous system and increases activity of commercially harvested white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus). J. Parasitol.97, 755–759. 10.1645/GE-2749.1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  CombesC. (2001). Parasitism: The Ecology and Evolution of Intimate Interactions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 32

  ConnorsV. A.NickolB. B. (1991). Effects of Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus (Acanthocephala) on the energy metabolism of adult starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Parasitology103, 395–402. 10.1017/S0031182000059916

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  CrowdenA.BroomD. (1980). Effects of the eyefluke, Diplostomum spathaceum, on the behaviour of dace (Leuciscus leuciscus). Anim. Behav.28, 287–294. 10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80031-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  DamsgaardJ. T.MouritsenK. N.JensenK. T. (2005). Surface activity of Corophium volutator: a role for parasites?J. Sea Res.54, 176–184. 10.1016/j.seares.2005.04.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  DawkinsR. (2012). Foreword, in Host Manipulation by Parasites, eds. HughesD. P.BrodeurJ.ThomasF. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), xi–xiii.

  • Google Scholar

• 36

  DecaesteckerE.GabaS.RaeymaekersJ. A.StoksR.Van KerckhovenL.EbertD.et al. (2007). Host–parasite ‘Red Queen’ dynamics archived in pond sediment. Nature450:870. 10.1038/nature06291

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  DespommierD. (2003). Toxocariasis: clinical aspects, epidemiology, medical ecology, and molecular aspects. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.16, 265–272. 10.1128/CMR.16.2.265-272.2003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  DianneL.BollacheL.LagrueC.FranceschiN.RigaudT. (2012). Larval size in acanthocephalan parasites: Influence of intraspecific competition and effects on intermediate host behavioural changes. Parasit. Vector5, 166–166. 10.1186/1756-3305-5-166

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  DianneL.Perrot-MinnotM. J.BauerA.GaillardM.LégerE.RigaudT. (2011). Protection first then facilitation: a manipulative parasite modulates the vulnerability to predation of its intermediate host according to its own developmental stage. Evolution65, 2692–2698. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01330.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  DunneD. W.CookeA. (2005). A worm's eye view of the immune system: consequences for evolution of human autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol.5, 420–426. 10.1038/nri1601

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  El-DakhlyK. M.HusseinN.El-NahassE.-S. (2018). Occurrence of helminths in the great cormorants, Phalacrocorax carbo, in Qena, Egypt. J. Adv. Vet. Res.8, 6–11.

  • Google Scholar

• 42

  ElmoreS. A.JonesJ. L.ConradP. A.PattonS.LindsayD. S.DubeyJ. P. (2010). Toxoplasma gondii: epidemiology, feline clinical aspects, and prevention. Trends Parasitol.26, 190–196. 10.1016/j.pt.2010.01.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  EwaldP. W. (1987). Transmission modes and evolution of theparasitism-mutualism continuuma. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.503, 295–306. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb40616.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  EwaldP. W. (1995). The evolution of virulence: a unifying link between parasitology and ecology. J. Parasitol.81, 659–669. 10.2307/3283951

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  FlegrJ. (2015). Host manipulation by Toxoplasma gondii, in Host Manipulations by Parasites and Viruses, ed. MehlhornH. (Basel: Springer International Publishing), 91–99. 10.1007/978-3-319-22936-2_6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  GeraciJ. R.St. AubinD. J. (1987). Effects of parasites on marine mammals. Int. J. Parasitol.17, 407–414. 10.1016/0020-7519(87)90116-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  GobleF. C.KutzH. (1945). The genus Dispharynx (Nematoda: Acuariidae) in galliform and passeriform birds. J. Parasitol.31, 323–331. 10.2307/3273088

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  GonzalezS. T. (2016). Influence of a trematode parasite (Microphallus turgidus) on grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) response to refuge and predator presence. J. Parasitol.102, 646–649. 10.1645/15-889

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  GopkoM.MikheevV. N.TaskinenJ. (2015). Changes in host behaviour caused by immature larvae of the eye fluke: evidence supporting the predation suppression hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.69, 1723–1730. 10.1007/s00265-015-1984-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  GourbalB. E.RighiM.PetitG.GabrionC. (2001). Parasite-altered host behavior in the face of a predator: manipulation or not?Parasitol. Res.87, 186–192. 10.1007/PL00008573

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  GrahamA. L.AllenJ. E.ReadA. F. (2005). Evolutionary causes and consequences of immunopathology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.36, 373–397. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152622

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  GustafssonL.NordlingD.AnderssonM. S.SheldonB. C.QvarnströmA. (1994). Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.346, 323–331. 10.1098/rstb.1994.0149

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  HadelerK. P.FreedmanH. I. (1989). Predator-prey populations with parasitic infection. J. Math. Biol.27, 609–631. 10.1007/BF00276947

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  HallA. R.ScanlanP. D.MorganA. D.BucklingA. (2011). Host–parasite coevolutionary arms races give way to fluctuating selection. Ecol. Lett.14, 635–642. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01624.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  HammerschmidtK.KochK.MilinskiM.ChubbJ. C.ParkerG. A. (2009). When to go: optimalization of host switching in parasites with complex life cycles. Evolution63, 1976–1986. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00687.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  HechtelL. J.JohnsonC. L.JulianoS. A. (1993). Modification of antipredator behavior of Caecidotea intermedius by its parasite Acanthocephalus dirus. Ecology74, 710–713. 10.2307/1940798

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  HelluyS.ThomasF. (2010). Parasitic manipulation and neuroinflammation: evidence from the system Microphallus papillorobustus (Trematoda)-Gammarus (Crustacea). Parasit. Vectors3:38. 10.1186/1756-3305-3-38

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  HindsboO.AndreassenJ.RuitenbergJ. (1982). Immunological and histopathological reactions of the rat against the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta and the effects of anti-thymocyte serum. Parasite Immunol.4, 59–76. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1982.tb00420.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  HindsboO. L. E. (1972). Effects of polymorphus (Acanthocephala) on colour and behaviour of Gammarus lacustris. Nature238:333. 10.1038/238333a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  HineP. M.KennedyC. R. (1974). Observations on the distribution, specificity and pathogenicity of the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis (Müller). J. Fish Biol.6, 521–535. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1974.tb04569.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  HoffmannR.KennedyC.MederJ. (1986). Effects of Eubothrium salvelini Schrank, 1790 on Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.), in an alpine lake. J. Fish Dis.9, 153–157. 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1986.tb00997.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  HollandC. V.CoxD. M. (2001). Toxocara in the mouse: a model for parasite-altered host behaviour?J. Helminthol.75:125. 10.1079/JOH200169

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  HolmesJ. C.BethelW. M. (1972). Modification of intermediate host behaviour by parasites, in Behavioural Aspects of Parasite Transmission, eds CanningE. U.WrightC. A. (New York: Academic Press Inc.), 123–149.

  • Google Scholar

• 64

  HoogenboomI.DijkstraC. (1987). Sarcocystis cernae: a parasite increasing the risk of predation of its intermediate host, Microtus arvalis. Oecologia74, 86–92. 10.1007/BF00377350

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  HudsonP. J.DobsonA. P.NewbornD. (1998). Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal. Science282, 2256–2258. 10.1126/science.282.5397.2256

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  HudsonP. J.NewbornD.DobsonA. P. (1992). Regulation and stability of a free-leaving host–parasite system, Trichostrongylus tenuis in red grouse. I. Monitoring and parasite reduction experiment. J. Anim. Ecol.61, 477–486. 10.2307/5338

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  HuxhamM.RaffaelliD.PikeA. (1995). The effect of larval trematodes on the growth and burrowing behaviour of Hydrobia ulvae (gastropoda: prosobranchiata) in the Ythan estuary, north-east Scotland. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.185, 1–17. 10.1016/0022-0981(94)00119-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  JohnsonP. T.LundeK. B.RitchieE. G.LaunerA. E. (1999). The effect of trematode infection on amphibian limb development and survivorship. Science284, 802–804. 10.1126/science.284.5415.802

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  JohnsonP. T. J.ReevesM. K.KrestS. K.PinkneyA. E. (2010). A decade of deformities: advances in our understanding of amphibian malformations and their implications, in Ecotoxicology of Amphibians and Reptiles, 2nd Edn, eds SparlingD. W.LinderG.BishopC. A.KrestS. K. (New York, NY: SETAC Press; CRC Press), 511–536.

  • Google Scholar

• 70

  JolyD. O.MessierF. (2004). The distribution of Echinococcus granulosus in moose: evidence for parasite-induced vulnerability to predation by wolves?Oecologia140, 586–590. 10.1007/s00442-004-1633-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  KaldonskiN.Perrot-MinnotM.-J.CézillyF. (2007). Differential influence of two acanthocephalan parasites on the antipredator behaviour of their common intermediate host. Anim. Behav.74, 1311–1317. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.02.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  KaufmanJ. (2010). Evolution and immunity. Immunology130, 459–462. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03294.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  KennedyC.BroughtonP.HineP. (1978). The status of brown and rainbow trout, Salmo trutta and S. gairdneri as hosts of the Acanthocephalan, Pomphorhynchus laevis. J. Fish Biol.13, 265–275. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1978.tb03434.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  KrauseJ.GodinJ.-G. J. (1994). Influence of parasitism on the shoaling behaviour of banded killifish, Fundulus diaphanus. Can. J. Zool.72, 1775–1779. 10.1139/z94-240

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  KrauseR. J.GrantJ. W. A.McLaughlinJ. D.MarcoglieseD. J. (2010). Do infections with parasites and exposure to pollution affect susceptibility to predation in johnny darters (Etheostoma nigrum)?Can. J. Zool.88, 1218–1225. 10.1139/Z10-089

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  KunzA. K.PungO. J. (2004). Effects of Microphallus turgidus (Trematoda: Microphallidae) on the predation, behavior, and swimming stamina of the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio. J. Parasitol.90, 441–445. 10.1645/GE-183R

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  KurisA. M. (2003). Evolutionary ecology of trophically transmitted parasites. J. Parasitol.89, S96–S100.

  • Google Scholar

• 78

  La SalaL. F.PerezA. M.SmitsJ. E.MartorelliS. R. (2013). Pathology of enteric infections induced by the acanthocephalan Profilicollis chasmagnathi in Olrog's gull, Larus atlanticus, from Argentina. J. Helminthol.87, 17–23. 10.1017/S0022149X11000721

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  LaantoE.HoikkalaV.RavanttiJ.SundbergL.-R. (2017). Long-term genomic coevolution of host-parasite interaction in the natural environment. Nat. Commun.8:111. 10.1038/s41467-017-00158-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  LaffertyK. D. (1992). Foraging on prey that are modified by parasites. Am. Nat.140, 854–867. 10.1086/285444

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  LaffertyK. D.KurisM. A. (2012). Ecological consequences of manipulative parasites, in Host Manipulation by Parasites, eds HughesD. P.BrodeurJ.ThomasF. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 158–168.

  • Google Scholar

• 82

  LaffertyK. D.MorrisA. K. (1996). Altered behavior of parasitized killifish increases susceptibility to predation by bird final hosts. Ecology77, 1390–1397. 10.2307/2265536

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  LaffertyK. D.ShawJ. C. (2013). Comparing mechanisms of host manipulation across host and parasite taxa. J. Exp. Biol.216(Pt 1), 56–66. 10.1242/jeb.073668

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  LathamA. D.PoulinR. (2002). Effect of acanthocephalan parasites on hiding behaviour in two species of shore crabs. J. Helminthol.76, 323–326. 10.1079/JOH2002139

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  LefèvreT.AdamoS. A.BironD. G.MissèD.HughesD.ThomasF. (2009). Invasion of the body snatchers: the diversity and evolution of manipulative strategies in host-parasite interactions. Adv. Parasitol.68, 45–83. 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)00603-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  LevineB.MizushimaN.VirginH. W. (2011). Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature469, 323–335. 10.1038/nature09782

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  LevriE. P. (1998). The influence of non-host predators on parasite-induced behavioral changes in a freshwater snail. Oikos, 531–537. 10.2307/3546773

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  LevriE. P.LivelyC. M. (1996). The effects of size, reproductive condition, and parasitism on foraging behaviour in a freshwater snail, Potamopyrgus antipodarum. Anim. Behav.51, 891–901. 10.1006/anbe.1996.0093

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  LibersatF.MooreJ. (2000). The parasite Moniliformis moniliformis alters the escape response of its cockroach host Periplaneta americana. J. Insect Behav.13, 103–110. 10.1023/A:1007719710664

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  LindquistW.StrafussA. (1980). (Dispharynx nasuta) May cycle within avian zoo populations. J. Zoo Anim. Med.11, 120–122. 10.2307/20094492

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  LootG.AulagnierS.LekS.ThomasF.GuéganJ.-F. (2002). Experimental demonstration of a behavioural modification in a cyprinid fish, Rutilus rutilus (L.), induced by a parasite, Ligula intestinalis (L.). Can. J. Zool.80, 738–744. 10.1139/z02-043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  LootG.BrosseS.LekS.GuéganJ. F. (2001). Behaviour of roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) altered by Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea): a field demonstration. Freshw. Biol.46, 1219–1227. 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00733.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  LuongL. T.HudsonP. J.BraithwaiteV. A. (2011). Parasite-induced changes in the anti-predator behavior of a cricket intermediate host. Ethology117, 1019–1026. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01951.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  MaizelsR. M. (2016). Parasitic helminth infections and the control of human allergic and autoimmune disorders. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.22, 481–486. 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.04.024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  MayR. M.AndersonR. M. (1990). Parasite—host coevolution. Parasitology100, S89–S101. 10.1017/S0031182000073042

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  MazziD.BakkerT. C. (2003). A predator's dilemma: prey choice and parasite susceptibility in three-spined sticklebacks. Parasitology126, 339–347. 10.1017/S0031182003003019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  McCallumH.GerberL.JaniA. (2005). Does infectious disease influence the efficacy of marine protected areas? A theoretical framework. J. Appl. Ecol.42, 688–698. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01043.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  McClellandG. (1980). Phocanema decipiens: pathology in seals. Exp. Parasitol.49, 405–419. 10.1016/0014-4894(80)90075-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  McCurdyD. G.ForbesM. R.BoatesJ. S. (1999). Evidence that the parasitic nematode Skrjabinoclava manipulates host corophium behavior to increase transmission to the sandpiper, Calidris pusilla. Behav. Ecol.10, 351–357. 10.1093/beheco/10.4.351

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  MethotP. O.AlizonS. (2014). What is a pathogen? Toward a process view of host-parasite interactions. Virulence5, 775–785. 10.4161/21505594.2014.960726

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  MöllerH.KlattS. (1990). Smelt as host of the sealworm (Pseudoterranova decipiens) in the Elbe estuary. Can. Bull. Fish. Aquat. Sci.222, 129–138.

  • Google Scholar

• 102

  MooreJ. (1983a). Altered behavior in cockroaches (Periplaneta americana) infected with an archiacanthocephalan, Moniliformis moniliformis. J. Parasitol.69, 1174–1176. 10.2307/3280893

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  MooreJ. (1983b). Responses of an avian predator and its isopod prey to an acanthocephalan parasite. Ecology64, 1000–1015. 10.2307/1937807

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  MooreJ. (2002). Parasites and the Behavior of Animals.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 105

  MooreJ. (2013). An overview of parasite-induced behavioral alterations – and some lessons from bats. J. Exp. Biol.216, 11–17. 10.1242/jeb.074088

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  MooreJ.BellD. H. (1983a). Pathology (?) of Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus in the starling, Sturnus vulgaris. J. Parasitol.69, 387–390. 10.2307/3281241

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  MooreJ.LasswellJ. (1986). Altered behavior in Isopods (Armadillidium vulgare) infected with the Nematode Dispharynx nasuta. J. Parasitol.72, 186–189. 10.2307/3281818

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  NordlingD.AnderssonM.ZohariS.LarsG. (1998). Reproductive effort reduces specific immune response and parasite resistance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.265, 1291–1298. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0432

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  NowakM. A.MayR. M. (1994). Superinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B255, 81–89. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  OtrantoD.TraversaD. (2003). Dicrocoeliosis of ruminants: a little known fluke disease. Trends Parasitol.19, 12–15. 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)00009-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  ParkerG. A.BallM. A.ChubbJ. C.HammerschmidtK.MilinskiM. (2009). When should a trophically transmitted parasite manipulate its host?Evolution63, 448–458. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00565.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  PasternakA. F.HuntingfordF. A.CromptonD. W. T. (1995). Changes in metabolism and behaviour of the freshwater copepod Cyclops strenuus abyssorum infected with Diphyllobothrium spp. Parasitology110, 395–399. 10.1017/S0031182000064738

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  PatersonS.VogwillT.BucklingA.BenmayorR.SpiersA.ThomsonN. R.et al. (2010). Antagonistic coevolution accelerates molecular evolution. Nature464:275. 10.1038/nature08798

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  PippyJ. H. (1969). Pomphorhynchus laevis (Zoega) Müller, 1776 (Acanthocephala) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and its use as a biological tag. J. Fish. Board Can.26, 909–919. 10.1139/f69-088

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  PoirierS. R.RauM. E.WangX. (1995). Diel locomotory activity of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) infected with Trichinella nativa or Trichinella pseudospiralis. Can. J. Zool.73, 1323–1334. 10.1139/z95-156

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  PoulinR. (1993). Age-dependent effects of parasites on anti-predator responses in two New Zealand freshwater fish. Oecologia96, 431–438. 10.1007/BF00317516

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  PoulinR. (2010). Parasite manipulation of host behavior: an update and frequently asked questions, in Advances in the Study of Behavior, eds BrockmannH. J.RoperT. J.NaguibM.Wynne-EdwardsK. E.MitaniJ. C.SimmonsL. W. (London; Burlington, MA; San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 151–186. 10.1016/S0065-3454(10)41005-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  PoulinR.BrodeurJ.MooreJ. (1994). Parasite manipulation of host behaviour: should hosts always lose?Oikos70, 479–484. 10.2307/3545788

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  PoulinR.CurtisM.RauM. (1992). Effects of Eubothrium salvelini (Cestoda) on the behaviour of Cyclops vernalis (Copepoda) and its susceptibility to fish predators. Parasitology105, 265–271. 10.1017/S0031182000074199

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  PoulinR.MaureF. (2015). Host manipulation by parasites: a look back before moving forward. Trends Parasitol.31, 563–570. 10.1016/j.pt.2015.07.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  PrandovszkyE.GaskellE.MartinH.DubeyJ. P.WebsterJ. P.McConkeyG. A. (2011). The neurotropic parasite Toxoplasma gondii increases dopamine metabolism. PLoS ONE6:e23866. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023866

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  PrestrudP.StuveG.HoltG. (1993). The Prevalence of Trichinella sp. in Arctic Foxes (Alopex lagopus) in Svalbard. J. Wildl. Dis.29, 337–340. 10.7589/0090-3558-29.2.337

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  QuinnS. C.BrooksR. J.CawthornR. J. (1987). Effects of the protozoan parasite Sarcocystis rauschorum on open-field behaviour of its intermediate vertebrate host, Dicrostonyx richardsoni. J. Parasitol.73, 265–271. 10.2307/3282077

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  RauM. (1983). The open-field behaviour of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology86, 311–318. 10.1017/S0031182000050472

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  RauM. E.PutterL. (1984). Trichinella spiralis-infected CD-1 mice. Parasitology89, 579–584. 10.1017/S0031182000056778

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  RibicichM.GambleH. R.RosaA.SommerfeltI.MarquezA.MiraG.et al. (2007). Clinical, haematological, biochemical and economic impacts of Trichinella spiralis infection in pigs. Vet. Parasitol.147, 265–270. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.04.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  RichR. R.ChaplinD. D. (2019). The human immune response, in Clinical Immunology: Principles and Practice, eds RichR. R.FleisherT. A.ShearerW. T.SchroederH. W.FrewA. J.WeyandC. M. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 3–17.

  • Google Scholar

• 128

  SakthivelA.GopalakrishnanA.SelvakumarP. (2016). Pathological manifestation of the Acanthocephalus dirus in Thunnus albacares. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis.6, 350–353. 10.1016/S2222-1808(15)61045-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  SantosE. G.SantosC. P. (2013). Parasite-induced and parasite development-dependent alteration of the swimming behavior of fish hosts. Acta Trop.127, 56–62. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.03.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  SchanbacherL. M.NationsJ. K.WeisbrodtN. W.CastroG. A. (1978). Intestinal myoelectric activity in parasitized dogs. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.234, R188–R195. 10.1152/ajpregu.1978.234.5.R188

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  SchmidtG. D.WalleyH. D.WijekD. S. (1974). Unusual pathology in a fish due to the acanthocephalan Acanthocephalus jacksoni Bullock, 1962. J. Parasitol.60, 730–731. 10.2307/3278753

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  SchulmanF. Y.MontaliR. J.CitinoS. B. (1992). Pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of Synhimantus nasuta infection in African jacanas (Actophilornis africana). J. Zoo Wildl. Med.23, 313–317.

  • Google Scholar

• 133

  SeppäläO.KarvonenA.ValtonenE. T. (2004). Parasite-induced change in host behaviour and susceptibility to predation in an eye fluke–fish interaction. Anim. Behav.68, 257–263. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  SeppäläO.KarvonenA.ValtonenE. T. (2008). Shoaling behaviour of fish under parasitism and predation risk. Anim. Behav.75, 145–150. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  SessionsS. K.RuthS. B. (1990). Explanation for naturally occurring supernumerary limbs in amphibians. J. Exp. Zool.254, 38–47. 10.1002/jez.1402540107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  SheathD. (2016). Ecological Consequences of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Freshwater Fish Parasites. PhD thesis, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth.

  • Google Scholar

• 137

  Siva-JothyM. T.TsubakiY.HooperR. E. (1998). Decreased immune response as a proximate cost of copulation and oviposition in a damselfly. Physiol. Entomol.23, 274–277. 10.1046/j.1365-3032.1998.233090.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  SmithH. D.MargolisL. (1970). Some effects of Eubothriuin salvelini (Schank, 1790) on Sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum), in Babine Lake, British Columbia. J. Parasitol.56, 321–322.

  • Google Scholar

• 139

  SolerJ. J.de NeveL.Pérez-ContrerasT.SolerM.SorciG. (2003). Trade-off between immunocompetence and growth in magpies: an experimental study. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.270, 241–248. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2217

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  SuresB. (2002). Competition for minerals between Acanthocephalus lucii and its definitive host perch (Perca fluviatilis). Int. J. Parasitol.32, 1117–1122. 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00083-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  SynG.AndersonD.BlackwellJ. M.JamiesonS. E. (2018). Epigenetic dysregulation of host gene expression in Toxoplasma infection with specific reference to dopamine and amyloid pathways. Infect. Genet. Evol.65, 159–162. 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.07.034

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  TaraschewskiH. (2000). Host-parasite interactions in Acanthocephala: a morphological approach. Adv. Parasitol.46, 1–179. 10.1016/S0065-308X(00)46008-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  TeimooriS.GharaguzluM.MakkiM.ShahbaziF.MobediI.Saboor YaraghiA.et al. (2011). Heavy worm burden of Moniliformis moniliformis in urban rats with histopathological description. Iran. J. Parasitol.6:107.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  ThomasF.PoulinR. (1998). Manipulation of a mollusc by a trophically transmitted parasite: convergent evolution or phylogenetic inheritance?Parasitology116, 431–436. 10.1017/S003118209800239X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  ThomasF.PoulinR.GuéganJ. F.MichalakisY.RenaudF. (2000). Are there pros as well as cons to being parasitized?Parasitol. Today16, 533–536. 10.1016/S0169-4758(00)01790-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  ThomasF.Schmidt-RhaesaA.MartinG.ManuC.DurandP.RenaudF. (2002). Do hairworms (Nematomorpha) manipulate the water seeking behaviour of their terrestrial hosts?J. Evol. Biol.15, 356–361. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00410.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  TierneyJ. F.HuntingfordF. A.CromptonD. W. (1993). The relationship between infectivity of Schistocephalus solidus (Cestoda) and anti-predator behaviour of its intermediate host, the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim. Behav.46, 603–605. 10.1006/anbe.1993.1229

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  VandegriftK. J.HudsonP. J. (2009). Could parasites destabilize mouse populations? The potential role of Pterygodermatites peromysci in the population dynamics of free-living mice, Peromyscus leucopus. Int. J. Parasitol.39, 1253–1262. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.02.025

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  VoríšekP.VotýpkaJ.ZváraK.SvobodováM. (1998). Heteroxenous coccidia increase the predation risk of parasitized rodents. Parasitology117, 521–524. 10.1017/S0031182098003242

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  WanstallS.RobothamP.ThomasJ. (1986). Pathological changes induced by Pomphorhynchus laevis Müller (Acanthocephala) in the gut of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde72, 105–114. 10.1007/BF00927741

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  WebberR.RauM.LewisD. (1987a). The effects of Plagiorchis noblei (Trematoda: Plagiorchiidae) matacercariae on the susceptibility of Aedes aegypti larvae to predation by guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Can. J. Zool.65, 2346–2348. 10.1139/z87-353

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  WebberR.RauM.LewisD. (1987b). The effects of Plagiorchis noblei (Trematoda: Plagiorchiidae) metacercariae on the behavior of Aedes aegypti larvae. Can. J. Zool.65, 1340–1342. 10.1139/z87-212

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  WebsterJ.Gowtage-SequeiraS.BerdoyM.HurdH. (2000). Predation of beetles (Tenebrio molitor) infected with tapeworms (Hymenolepis diminuta): a note of caution for the manipulation hypothesis. Parasitology120, 313–318. 10.1017/S003118209900548X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  WebsterJ. P. (2001). Rats, cats, people and parasites: the impact of latent toxoplasmosis on behaviour. Microbes Infect.3, 1037–1045. 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01459-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  WeinreichF.BeneshD. P.MilinskiM. (2013). Suppression of predation on the intermediate host by two trophically-transmitted parasites when uninfective. Parasitology140, 129–135. 10.1017/S0031182012001266

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  WilsonK.EdwardsJ. (1986). The effects of parasitic infection on the behaviour of an intermediate host, the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana, infected with the acanthocephalan, Moniliformis moniliformis. Anim. Behav.34, 942–944. 10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80088-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  WoolhouseM. E. J.WebsterJ. P.DomingoE.CharlesworthB.LevinB. R. (2002). Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nat. Genet.32:569. 10.1038/ng1202-569

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar