REVIEW article

Front. Ecol. Evol., 15 February 2022

Sec. Coevolution

Volume 10 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.796830

The Chironomid Microbiome Plays a Role in Protecting Its Host From Toxicants

  • 1. Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

  • 2. Department of Biology and Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

Article metrics

View details

7

Citations

2,7k

Views

809

Downloads

Abstract

Organisms are assemblages of the host and their endogenous bacteria, which are defined as microbiomes. The host and its microbiome undergo a mutual evolutionary process to adapt to changes in the environment. Chironomids (Diptera; Chironomidae), are aquatic insects that grow and survive in polluted environments; however, the mechanisms that protect them under these conditions are not fully understood. Here we present evidence that the chironomids’ microbiome enables them to survival in polluted environments. It has been demonstrated that about 40% of the microbiota that inhabit Chironomus transvaalensis egg masses and larvae has the potential to detoxify different toxicants. Metagenomic analysis of Chironomus ramosus larvae demonstrated the presence of genes in the insects’ microbiome that can help the insects to survive in hostile environments. A set of experiments demonstrated that short exposure of C. transvaalensis larvae to metals significantly changed their microbiota composition in comparison to unexposed larvae. Another experiment, that followed Koch’s postulates, demonstrated that disinfected C. transvaalensis larvae can survive toxic lead and chromium exposure when they are recolonized with bacteria that can detoxify these toxic metals. This accumulating research, points to the conclusion that the chironomid microbiome plays a role in protecting its host from toxicants.

Introduction

All organisms host microbial assemblages that reside inside or on the surfaces of their body. These endogenous microorganisms, and the genes that are encoded in their chromosomes, are called the microbiome. Rosenberg and Zilber-Rosenberg (2013), proposed that an organism should be defined together with its microbiome as a holobiont. Moreover, they suggested that the host and the microbiota that inhabit it undergo joint evolutionary processes. One of these mutual evolutionary processes may be the adaptation to survive under hostile environments.

This review discusses how chironomids can survive and proliferate in stressful environments. We will highlight the chironomids’ abilities to endure toxic heavy metals and demonstrate which microbes and genes may be involved in protecting the insects under stressful conditions.

Chironomids

Chironomids (Insecta; Diptera; Chironomidae; Chironomus spp.), are insects that undergo a full metamorphosis of four life stages: eggs, larvae, pupae (that develop in the water) and flying adults. In contrast to mosquitoes, chironomid adults do not feed or bite. They are globally distributed in various aquatic environments. It has been demonstrated that chironomids are natural hosts of V. cholerae and Aeromonas spp. (Broza and Halpern, 2001; Senderovich et al., 2008; Laviad and Halpern, 2016; Laviad-Shitrit et al., 2020).

The larvae of Chironomus spp. live at the bottom of freshwater habitats and form one of the most important functional groups in these ecosystems (Pinder, 1986). Aquatic sediments act as a sink for naturally occurring wastes and tend to be contaminated with toxic inorganic and organic compounds (Salmons et al., 1987). Chironomids live in almost every type of aquatic habitat and can tolerate extreme temperatures, pH, salinity, depth, current velocity and even dehydration and ultraviolet (UV) and gamma radiations (Armitage et al., 1995; Datkhile et al., 2009a,b, 2015; Thorat and Nath, 2015). As a group, they are considered pollution tolerant and are known to thrive under adverse environmental conditions (Armitage et al., 1995; Wright and Burgin, 2009). They were found to dominate the fauna in polluted areas of streams, while in unpolluted sections of the same streams, they formed only a minor part of the fauna (Winner et al., 1980; Richardson and Kiffney, 2000; Watanabe et al., 2000). Tolerance of chironomids to pollution is well documented; however, the protective mechanisms they employ in contaminated and sometimes extreme environments are not fully understood.

Chironomids’ Microbiome

Several studies of Chironomus transvaalensis endogenous microbiota that used both culturable and unculturable methods identified a list of bacterial species that comprised C. transvaalensis microbiome. Among the microbiota that were identified from C. transvaalensis microbiome there were species from the following genera: Acidovorax, Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Aquabacterium, Bacillus, Brevundimonas, Cetobacterium, Chryseobacterium, Citrobacter, Clostridium, Comamonas, Deinococcus, Delftia, Desulfovibrio, Exiguobacterium, Hydrogenophaga, Klebsiella, Oceanobacillus, Paracoccus, Pseudomonas, Rheinheimera, Shewanella, Stenotrophomonas, Vogesella, Yersinia, and Vibrio (Halpern et al., 2007a; Halpern, 2012; Senderovich and Halpern, 2012, 2013; Halpern and Senderovich, 2015; Sela and Halpern, 2019; Sela et al., 2020). Four isolates that were cultured and identified from Chironomus egg masses were identified as novel bacterial species: Oceanobacillus chironomi, Rheinheimera chironomi, Leucobacter chironomi, and Brachymonas chironomi (Halpern et al., 2007b,2009a,b; Raats and Halpern, 2007).

Sela et al. (2020) found significant differences between the microbiota compositions of C. transvaalensis egg mass, larva, pupa and adult life stages. In each developmental stage, some genera were relatively dominant. In the egg mass stage, Hydrogenophaga, Deinococcus, Rheinheimera, and Aeromonas; for larvae, Cetobacterium, Vibrio, Aeromonas, and Acinetobacter; in pupae, Aeromonas, Aquabacterium, and Clostridium; and in adults, Aeromonas, Acinetobacter, and Vogesella. Interestingly, Aeromonas species were detected in all life stages of C. transvaalensis, suggesting that chironomids are reservoirs of Aeromonas species and they may serve as symbionts (Senderovich et al., 2008; Sela et al., 2020).

Evidence for the Protective Role of the Endogenous Microbiota

It has been demonstrated that chironomids’ larvae microbiota may play a role in protecting their host from toxic metals (Senderovich and Halpern, 2012, 2013). Senderovich and Halpern (2012), isolated and identified different bacterial species from C. transvaalensis egg masses and larvae that were able to grow on selective media with high metal concentrations. The following bacterial species were isolated and identified from egg masses and demonstrated resistance to toxic metals; Citrobacter freundii; Citrobacter youngae; Enterobacter ludwigii were found to be resistant to copper while Bacillus horneckiae; Bacillus stratosphericus; Exiguobacterium indicum were identified as resistant to hexavalent chromium. Resistance to zinc was found in Pseudomonas geniculate and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, while Yersinia nurmii and Exiguobacterium profundum demonstrated resistance to lead.

When Senderovich and Halpern (2013) analyzed the bacterial communities of C. transvaalensis egg masses and larvae they found that about 40 and 25% of all the genera that were identified in the egg masses and larval bacterial communities, respectively, may potentially have detoxifying abilities (Table 1). For example; Aeromonas species (3.3 and 1.6% prevalence in the larvae and the egg masses, respectively) were documented as species with the ability to detoxify toxic substances including heavy metals like Pb, Cr, Cu, Zn, and tributyltin (TBT) (Cruz et al., 2007; Senderovich and Halpern, 2012, 2013; Laviad and Halpern, 2016; Table 1). Further confirmation for the potential abilities of chironomid microbiota to detoxify a wide variety of toxicants was reported by Sela and Halpern (2019), who found that 43.3% of the genera that were identified from egg masses that were sampled from natural environments have the potential to detoxify or degrade different toxicants (Table 1; Sela and Halpern, 2019).

TABLE 1

Class/Genus Known detoxifying activity References
Betaproteobacteria
Hydrogenophaga Biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls Lambo and Patel, 2007
Acidovorax Degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls Ohtsubo et al., 2006
Dechloromonas Degradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene Chakraborty et al., 2005
Comamonas Catabolism of biphenyl or chlorobiphenyl; steroid degradation Sylvestre, 1995; Horinouchi et al., 2014
Diaphorobacter Degradation of pyrene Klankeo et al., 2009
Burkholderia/Paraburkholderia Crystal violet biodegradation; xenobiotic pollutants degradation O’Sullivan and Mahenthiralingam, 2005; Gan et al., 2014
Gammaproteobacteria
Pseudomonas Aromatic hydrocarbon oxidation; bioremediation of polluted areas; phenol degradation Williams and Sayers, 1994; Jõesaar et al., 2017
Acinetobacter Biodegradation of chlorinated phenols Lee et al., 1994
Aeromonas Tributyltin degradation Cruz et al., 2007
Rheinheimera Degradation of phenolic lignin-related compounds Virk et al., 2012
Halomonas Arsenic detoxification Wu et al., 2018
Stenotrophomonas Utilization of aromatic compounds; tolerance to heavy metals Aslam et al., 2018
Escherichia-Shigella Detoxification of silver ions; nitric oxide detoxification Franke et al., 2001
Thiothrix Sulfur oxidization Flot et al., 2014
Deltaproteobacteria
Desulfomicrobium Chromate bioremediation Michel et al., 2001
Desulfovibrio Chromate reduction Michel et al., 2001
Smithella Degradation of alkanes Tan et al., 2014
Bacilli
Exiguobacterium Bio-removal of hexavalent chromium from water; arsenic tolerance Okeke, 2008; da Costa et al., 2018
Flavobacteriia
Flavobacterium Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Samanta et al., 2002
Fluviicola Phenol and thiocyanide degradation Liu G. X. et al., 2017
Cloacibacterium Heavy metal resistance Jayanthi et al., 2017; Liu H. et al., 2017
Actinobacteria
Aeromicrobium Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria isolated from petroleum-polluted soil Chaillan et al., 2004
Propionibacterium Dechlorination of tetrachloroethylene- and cis-1, 2-dichloroethylene Chang et al., 2011
Leucobacter Heavy metal tolerance Hou et al., 2018
Anaerolineae
Longilinea Vanadium reduction Liu H. et al., 2017
Caldisericia
Caldisericum Sulfur oxidation and/or sulfate reduction reactions Aida et al., 2014
Cyanophyceae
Cyanobacterium Cr VI removal; phenol degradation Sood et al., 2015
Alphaproteobacteria
Rhodobacter Adaptation to metal stress; cadmium bioremediation Bai et al., 2008; Volpicella et al., 2014

A list of bacterial genera that were identified in C. transvaalensis egg masses, larvae or pupa and that have the potential to detoxify toxic substances.

Classes names are is in bold letters.

Leucobacter chironomi and Brachymonas chironomi (Halpern et al., 2009a,b), that were isolated from chironomid egg masses, were found to be resistant to heavy metals and other toxicants. The whole genome sequences of these two species (Genbank ID; ATXU00000000 and ARGE00000000, respectively) (Laviad et al., 2015a,b), revealed that their genomes include genes with the potential to detoxify toxic substances (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Bacterial species Arsenic resistance Copper resistance Other heavy metals Organic solvents
Brachymonas chironomi (Genbank ID; ARGE00000000) ArsR; Arsenical resistance operon trans-acting repressor, ArsD; Arsenite efflux ATP-binding protein, ArsA; A hypothetical arsenic resistance protein (ACR3 family). A gene for arsenate reductase (ArsC family) is present in a different operon. Copper resistance protein D, CopD; copper chaperone, copper-resistance protein, CopA; copper (or silver) translocating P-type ATPase Organic solvents; two genes encoding the ABC-type transport system involved in resistance to organic solvents
Leucobacter chironomi (Genbank ID; ATXU00000000) Arsenical resistance protein (ArsB); arsenite efflux pump ACR3 and related permeases. Copper chaperone; copper (or silver) translocating P-type ATPase Heavy metal-(Cd/Co/Hg/Pb/Zn)-translocating P-type ATPase and transcriptional regulator (ArsR family) involved in stress-
response to heavy metal ions

A list of genes encoding enzymes with predicted resistance to toxic substances (data from Laviad et al., 2015a,b).

A metagenomic study on Polypedilum vanderplanki (Chironomidae) larvae, that can endure desiccation, revealed that microbiota that inhabit this larval species can also withstand desiccation and radiation. However, it is not clear if these microorganisms that are resistant to desiccation contribute to the resistance of the larvae to desiccation (Shaikhutdinov et al., 2020).

Metagenomic Study of Chironomus ramosus Larvae

Sela et al. (2021) analyzed three Chironomus ramosus larval microbiomes using metagenomics. Genes for detoxifying toxic metals like, copper (pcoD; copC; pcoC), Zinc (zraP), lead (cadC; smtB), and others, were detected in the metagenomic data. Furthermore, the presence of genes for resistance to antibiotics, UV radiation and others that were related to stress tolerance were also identified in the C. ramosus larval microbiome. Overall, 115,959 bacterial functional genes and 445 different pathways were detected in the C. ramosus larval microbiome (Sela et al., 2021).

One of the pathways that was detected in the larval microbiome was the toluene degradation pathway. Toluene, known to cause harm to the central nervous system (Beller et al., 1992), is a waste product in different industrial processes and as such, is defined as an environmental contaminant (Heydarnezhad et al., 2018). It was found that species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera are able to degrade toluene and use it as their sole carbon source (Hamzah et al., 2011). These genera were identified in C. ramosus metagenomic analysis (Sela et al., 2021). Another relevant pathway identified is the atrazine degradation pathway (Sela et al., 2021). Atrazine is herbicide (Steinberg et al., 1995) extensively used to prevent the growth of wild plants in agriculture worldwide (Graymore et al., 2001). High concentrations of atrazine are detected in waterbody sediment (Graymore et al., 2001), where chironomids flourish. A variety of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial genera were reported to degrade atrazine, including Pseudomonas (Mandelbaum et al., 1995), Rhodococcus (Behki et al., 1993), Acinetobacter (Mirgain et al., 1993), and Arthrobacter (Cai et al., 2003). All these genera were identified in the metagenomic data. Remarkably, high abundances of Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas were identified in C. ramosus larvae (Sela et al., 2021). These data provided evidence for the ability of the C. ramosus microbiome to protect the insect in hostile environments (Sela et al., 2021).

Experimental Proof of the Role of the Microbiota in Protecting Chironomids

To determine the role of chironomids’ endogenous bacteria in the survival of chironomids in polluted environments, a bioassay based on Koch’s postulates was performed (Figure 1; Senderovich and Halpern, 2013). In a preliminary experiment, they isolated two bacterial strains; Chromobacterium aquaticum and Shewanella decolorationis, that were identified from C. transvaalensis larvae that survived exposure to toxic lead and hexavalent chromium, respectively. These species were found to reduce 94% of toxic lead and 100% of hexavalent chromium, respectively. When these species were added to disinfected larvae that were incubated in lead or chromate containing environments, respectively, they significantly increased survival of the larvae in these toxic environments, compared to disinfected larvae without the addition of C. aquaticum and/or Sh. decolorationis. Thus, it has been demonstrated that these endogenous bacteria enable their host to survive in lead-nitrate and hexavalent chromate containing environments (Senderovich and Halpern, 2013).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Koch’s postulates were applied to demonstrate the role of the chironomid microbiome in protecting its host from toxic metals. Untreated larvae that contained the endogenous microbiota survived significantly better in lead-nitrate environments in comparison to disinfected (with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.05% and cetrimide 0.5%) larvae. The supplementation of Chromobacterium aquaticum that has been previously isolated from larvae that survived in the presence of lead, to the disinfected larvae in lead nitrate environment, significantly improved the survival rate of the disinfected larvae. The survival rate of untreated larvae that contained its normal microbiota was 78% (right side of the figure) while the survival rate of the disinfected larvae in the presence of lead was only 31% (Left side of the figure). The addition of C. aquaticum to the disinfected larvae that were incubated with lead caused the survival rate to rise from 31 to 82% (left side of the figure; data from Senderovich and Halpern, 2013).

In another study, Laviad-Shitrit et al. (2021) examined larval survival and the change in the larval microbiota composition after 6 days of exposure to different concentrations of toxic copper and hexavalent chromium. A shift in the bacterial microbiota composition was observed in the larvae that were exposed to the different metals (Figure 2). Moreover, this shift was specific to the contaminating metal, suggesting that microbial composition changes—specifically proliferation of species with metal-reducing properties—in response to metal exposure may protect the larvae from the toxic metals. A proof for this hypothesis is the fact that there were no significant differences in the larval mortality between the control and the metal exposed larvae (Laviad-Shitrit et al., 2021; Figure 2). Furthermore, at the genus level, Yersinia and Acinetobacter abundances increased in the copper treated larvae, while Yersinia, Dysgonomonas, Delftia, and Enterococcus abundances increased after the larvae were exposed to hexavalent chromium, compared to the control. The change in the larval microbiota composition was rapid and metal-specific. Laviad-Shitrit et al. (2021) concluded that C. transvaalensis larvae host a bacterial consortium that proliferates differently and specifically under each environmental change and thus, protects the insect in various harsh conditions (Laviad-Shitrit et al., 2021).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

An NMDS (non-metric multidimensional scaling) plot of the bacterial community composition of larvae that were exposed to copper or hexavalent chromium vs. the control (stress value = 0.23). Significant differences were found between the bacterial communities of the control, the hexavalent chromium, and the copper treated larvae (ANOSIM: R = 0.476, p = 0.001). Adopted with permission from Laviad-Shitrit et al. (2021).

Concluding Remarks and Future Directions

The majority of the endogenous microbiota in chironomid egg masses and larvae is unculturable (Senderovich and Halpern, 2012). In this review we presented evidence that C. transvaalensis and C. ramosus microbiomes play a role in the survival of their host under toxic metal conditions. It is likely that the relative abundance of the different endogenous species that inhabit the insect changes according to environmental changes. As shown in this review, under high toxic metal concentrations, specific bacterial species with the potential ability to detoxify these metals will relatively proliferate and protect the host (Figure 3). More studies are needed to explore the mechanisms of this phenomenon in different Chironomus species and in different toxic and extreme environments. We assume that this phenomenon of the protective nature of the microbiota in the chironomid holobiont unit is probably only the tip of the iceberg. Further study of the role that microbiomes play in protecting different organisms is needed to understand the role of endogenous microbiota in protecting their hosts.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3

The change in the chironomid larval microbiome composition after exposure to a polluted environment. In an unpolluted environment, the diversity of the larval microbiome is relatively high. The microbiota composition contains a collection of bacterial species with different potential abilities (left). When pollution is introduced into the aquatic environment, specific bacterial species in the larval microbiome, with the potential ability to detoxify the pollutant, will relatively proliferate and protect the host under the stressful conditions (right). As a consequence, the diversity of the larval microbiome will be reduced compared to the unpolluted environment. This procedure is bidirectional, meaning that when the environment becomes cleaner, the diversity of the larval microbiome will increase again.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Author contributions

RS and MH wrote the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation, BSF (grant no. 2015103) and the Joint UGC—ISF (4th cycle) Research Grant (grant no. 2728/17).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    Aida A. A. Hatamoto M. Yamamoto M. Ono S. Nakamura A. Takahashi M. et al (2014). Molecular characterization of anaerobic sulfur-oxidizing microbial communities in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating municipal sewage.J. Biosci. Bioeng.118540545. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.04.011

  • 2

    Armitage P. Cranston P. S. Pinder L. C. V. Berg M. B. (1995). The Chironomidae: Biology and Ecology of Non-Biting Midges.London: Chapman and Hall.

  • 3

    Aslam F. Yasmin A. Thomas T. (2018). Essential gene clusters identified in Stenotrophomonas MB339 for multiple metal/antibiotic resistance and xenobiotic degradation.Curr. Microbiol.7514841492. 10.1007/s00284-018-1549-2

  • 4

    Bai H.-J. Zhang Z.-M. Yang G.-E. Li B.-Z. (2008). Bioremediation of cadmium by growing Rhodobacter sphaeroides: kinetic characteristic and mechanism studies.Bioresour. Technol.9977167722. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.071

  • 5

    Behki R. Topp E. Dick W. Germon P. (1993). Metabolism of the herbicide atrazine by Rhodococcus strains.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.5919551959. 10.1128/aem.59.6.1955-1959.1993

  • 6

    Beller H. R. Grbić-Galić D. Reinhard M. (1992). Microbial degradation of toluene under sulfate-reducing conditions and the influence of iron on the process.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.58786793. 10.1128/AEM.58.3.786-793.1992

  • 7

    Broza M. Halpern M. (2001). Chironomid egg masses and Vibrio cholerae.Nature4124040. 10.1038/35083691

  • 8

    Cai B. Han Y. Liu B. Ren Y. Jiang S. (2003). Isolation and characterization of an atrazine-degrading bacterium from industrial wastewater in China.Lett. Appl. Microbiol.36272276. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01307.x

  • 9

    Chaillan F. Le Flèche A. Bury E. Phantavong Y. Grimont P. Saliot A. et al (2004). Identification and biodegradation potential of tropical aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms.Res. Microbiol.155587595. 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.04.006

  • 10

    Chakraborty R. O’Connor S. M. Chan E. Coates J. D. (2005). Anaerobic degradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene compounds by Dechloromonas strain RCB.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.7186498655. 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8649-8655.2005

  • 11

    Chang Y.-C. Ikeutsu K. Toyama T. Choi D. Kikuchi S. (2011). Isolation and characterization of tetrachloroethylene- and cis-1,2-dichloroethylene-dechlorinating propionibacteria.J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.3816671677. 10.1007/s10295-011-0956-1

  • 12

    Cruz A. Caetano T. Suzuki S. Mendo S. (2007). Aeromonas veronii, a tributyltin (TBT)-degrading bacterium isolated from an estuarine environment, Ria de Aveiro in Portugal.Mar. Environ. Res.64639650. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.06.006

  • 13

    da Costa W. L. O. Araújo C. L. A. Dias L. M. Pereira L. C. S. Alves J. T. C. Araújo F. A. et al (2018). Functional annotation of hypothetical proteins from the Exiguobacterium antarcticum strain B7 reveals proteins involved in adaptation to extreme environments, including high arsenic resistance.PLoS One13:e0198965. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198965

  • 14

    Datkhile K. D. Dongre T. K. Mukhopadhyaya R. Nath B. B. (2009a). Gamma radiation tolerance of a tropical species of midge, Chironomus ramosus Chaudhuri (Diptera: Chironomidae).Int. J. Radiat. Biol.85495503. 10.1080/09553000902883786

  • 15

    Datkhile K. D. Mukhopadhyaya R. Dongre T. K. Nath B. B. (2009b). Increased level of superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in larvae of Chironomus ramosus (Diptera: Chironomidae) subjected to ionizing radiation.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol.149500506. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.11.003

  • 16

    Datkhile K. D. Gaikwad P. S. Ghaskadbi S. S. Mukhopadhyaya R. Nath B. B. (2015). Chironomus ramosus larvae exhibit DNA damage control in response to gamma radiation.Int. J. Radiat. Biol.91742748. 10.3109/09553002.2015.1062572

  • 17

    Flot J. F. Bauermeister J. Brad T. Hillebrand-Voiculescu A. Sarbu S. M. Dattagupta S. (2014). Niphargus – Thiothrix associations may be widespread in sulphidic groundwater ecosystems: evidence from southeastern Romania.Mol. Ecol.2314051417. 10.1111/mec.12461

  • 18

    Franke S. Grass G. Nies D. H. (2001). The product of the ybdE gene of the Escherichia coli chromosome is involved in detoxification of silver ions.Microbiology147965972. 10.1099/00221287-147-4-965

  • 19

    Gan L. Cheng Y. Palanisami T. Chen Z. Megharaj M. Naidu R. (2014). Pathways of reductive degradation of crystal violet in wastewater using free-strain Burkholderia vietnamiensis C09V.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.211033910348. 10.1007/s11356-014-3037-y

  • 20

    Graymore M. Stagnitti F. Allinson G. (2001). Impacts of atrazine in aquatic ecosystems.Environ. Int.26483495. 10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00031-9

  • 21

    Halpern M. (2012). Chironomids and Vibrio cholerae. Beneficial Microorganisms in Multicellular Life Forms.Berlin: Springer.

  • 22

    Halpern M. Senderovich Y. (2015). Chironomid microbiome.Microb. Ecol.7018. 10.1007/s00248-014-0536-9

  • 23

    Halpern M. Landsberg O. Raats D. Rosenberg E. (2007a). Culturable and VBNC Vibrio cholerae: interactions with chironomid egg masses and their bacterial population.Microb. Ecol.53285293. 10.1007/s00248-006-9094-0

  • 24

    Halpern M. Senderovich Y. Snir S. (2007b). Rheinheimera chironomi sp. nov., isolated from a chironomid (Diptera; Chironomidae) egg mass.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.5718721875. 10.1099/ijs.0.64927-0

  • 25

    Halpern M. Shaked T. Pukall R. Schumann P. (2009a). Leucobacter chironomi sp. nov., a chromate-resistant bacterium isolated from a chironomid egg mass.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.59665670.

  • 26

    Halpern M. Shakèd T. Schumann P. (2009b). Brachymonas chironomi sp. nov., isolated from a chironomid egg mass, and emended description of the genus Brachymonas.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.5930253029.

  • 27

    Hamzah A. Tavakoli A. Rabu A. (2011). Detection of toluene degradation in bacteria isolated from oil contaminated soils.Sains Malays.4012311235.

  • 28

    Heydarnezhad F. Hoodaji M. Shahriarinour M. Tahmourespour A. Shariati S. (2018). Optimizing toluene degradation by bacterial strain isolated from oil-polluted soils.Pol. J. Environ. Stud.27655663. 10.15244/pjoes/75811

  • 29

    Horinouchi M. Hayashi T. Koshino H. Malon M. Hirota H. Kudo T. (2014). Identification of 9α-hydroxy-17-oxo-1,2,3,4,10,19-hexanorandrost-6-en-5-oic acid and β-oxidation products of the C-17 side chain in cholic acid degradation by Comamonas testosteroni TA441.J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.143306322. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.04.014

  • 30

    Hou S.-Y. Wang F. Zhang M.-Y. Cheng J. Zhang Y.-X. (2018). A novel pigmented and heavy metal biosorptive bacterium, Leucobacter epilobiisoli sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of Epilobium hirsutum L.Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek11118251833. 10.1007/s10482-018-1071-3

  • 31

    Jayanthi B. Emenike C. U. Auta S. H. Agamuthu P. Fauziah S. H. (2017). Characterization of induced metal responses of bacteria isolates from active non-sanitary landfill in Malaysia.Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation119467475. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.053

  • 32

    Jõesaar M. Viggor S. Heinaru E. Naanuri E. Mehike M. Leito I. et al (2017). Strategy of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes C70 for effective degradation of phenol and salicylate.PLoS One12:e0173180. 10.1371/journal.pone.0173180

  • 33

    Klankeo P. Nopcharoenkul W. Pinyakong O. (2009). Two novel pyrene-degrading Diaphorobacter sp. and Pseudoxanthomonas sp. isolated from soil.J. Biosci. Bioeng.108488495. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.05.016

  • 34

    Lambo A. J. Patel T. R. (2007). Biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls in Aroclor 1232 and production of metabolites from 2,4,4′-trichlorobiphenyl at low temperature by psychrotolerant Hydrogenophaga sp. strain IA3-A.J. Appl. Microbiol.10213181329. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03268.x

  • 35

    Laviad S. Halpern M. (2016). Chironomids’ relationship with Aeromonas species.Front. Microbiol.7:736. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00736

  • 36

    Laviad S. Lapidus A. Copeland A. Reddy T. Huntemann M. Pati A. et al (2015a). High quality draft genome sequence of Leucobacter chironomi strain MM2LBT (DSM 19883T) isolated from a Chironomus sp. egg mass.Stand. Genom. Sci.10:21. 10.1186/s40793-015-0003-3

  • 37

    Laviad S. Lapidus A. Han J. Haynes M. Reddy T. Huntemann M. et al (2015b). High quality draft genome sequence of Brachymonas chironomi AIMA4T (DSM 19884T) isolated from a Chironomus sp. egg mass.Stand. Genom. Sci.10:29. 10.1186/s40793-015-0010-4

  • 38

    Laviad-Shitrit S. Sela R. Thorat L. Sharaby Y. Izhaki I. Nath B. B. et al (2020). Identification of chironomid species as natural reservoirs of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae strains with pandemic potential.PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.14:e0008959. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008959

  • 39

    Laviad-Shitrit S. Sharaby Y. Sela R. Thorat L. Nath B. B. Halpern M. (2021). Copper and chromium exposure affect chironomid larval microbiota composition.Sci. Total Environ.771:145330. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145330

  • 40

    Lee C. M. Lu C. J. Chuang M. S. (1994). Effects of immobilized cells on the biodegradation of chlorinated phenols.Water Sci. Technol.308790. 10.2166/wst.1994.0449

  • 41

    Liu G. X. Wu H.-Z. Sun S.-L. Hu X.-Y. Wu X.-Y. Chen H.-Y. et al (2017). Aerobic degradation and microbial community succession of coking wastewater with municipal sludge.Huan Jing Ke Xue3838073815. 10.13227/j.hjkx.201702146

  • 42

    Liu H. Zhang B. Yuan H. Cheng Y. Wang S. He Z. (2017). Microbial reduction of vanadium (V) in groundwater: interactions with coexisting common electron acceptors and analysis of microbial community.Environ. Pollut.23113621369. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.111

  • 43

    Mandelbaum R. T. Allan D. L. Wackett L. P. (1995). Isolation and characterization of a Pseudomonas sp. that mineralizes the s-triazine herbicide atrazine.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.6114511457. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1451-1457.1995

  • 44

    Michel C. Brugna M. Aubert C. Bernadac A. Bruschi M. (2001). Enzymatic reduction of chromate: comparative studies using sulfate-reducing bacteria. Key role of polyheme cytochromes c and hydrogenases.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.5595100. 10.1007/s002530000467

  • 45

    Mirgain I. Green G. A. Monteil H. (1993). Degradation of atrazine in laboratory microcosms: isolation and identification of the biodegrading bacteria.Environ. Toxicol. Chem.1216271634. 10.1002/etc.5620120911

  • 46

    O’Sullivan L. A. Mahenthiralingam E. (2005). Biotechnological potential within the genus Burkholderia.Lett. Appl. Microbiol.41811. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01758.x

  • 47

    Ohtsubo Y. Goto H. Nagata Y. Kudo T. Tsuda M. (2006). Identification of a response regulator gene for catabolite control from a PCB-degrading beta-proteobacteria, Acidovorax sp. KKS102.Mol. Microbiol.6015631575. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05197.x

  • 48

    Okeke B. C. (2008). Bioremoval of hexavalent chromium from water by a salt tolerant bacterium, Exiguobacterium sp. GS1.J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.3515711579. 10.1007/s10295-008-0399-5

  • 49

    Pinder L. C. V. (1986). Biology of freshwater Chironomidae.Annu. Rev. Entomol.31123. 10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.000245

  • 50

    Raats D. Halpern M. (2007). Oceanobacillus chironomi sp. nov., a halotolerant and facultative alkaliphilic species isolated from a chironomid egg mass.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.57255259. 10.1099/ijs.0.64502-0

  • 51

    Richardson J. S. Kiffney P. M. (2000). Responses of a macroinvertebrate community from a pristine, southern British columbia, Canada, stream to metals in experimental mesocosms.Environ. Toxicol. Chem.19736743. 10.1002/etc.5620190328

  • 52

    Rosenberg E. Zilber-Rosenberg I. (2013). The Hologenome Concept: Human, Animal and Plant Microbiota.New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-04241-1

  • 53

    Salmons W. de Rooij N. Kerdijk H. Bril J. (1987). Sediments as a source for contaminants?Hydrobiology1491330. 10.1007/BF00048643

  • 54

    Samanta S. K. Singh O. V. Jain R. K. (2002). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: environmental pollution and bioremediation.Trends Biotechnol.20243248. 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01943-1

  • 55

    Sela R. Halpern M. (2019). Seasonal dynamics of Chironomus transvaalensis populations and the microbial community composition of their egg masses.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.366:fnaa008. 10.1093/femsle/fnaa008

  • 56

    Sela R. Laviad-Shitrit S. Halpern M. (2020). Changes in microbiota composition along the metamorphosis developmental stages of Chironomus transvaalensis.Front. Microbiol.11:586678. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.586678

  • 57

    Sela R. Laviad-Shitrit S. Thorat L. Nath B. B. Halpern M. (2021). Chironomus ramosus larval microbiome composition provides evidence for the presence of detoxifying enzymes.Microorganisms9:1571. 10.3390/microorganisms9081571

  • 58

    Senderovich Y. Halpern M. (2012). Bacterial community composition associated with chironomid egg masses.J. Insect Sci.12114. 10.1673/031.012.14901

  • 59

    Senderovich Y. Halpern M. (2013). The protective role of endogenous bacterial communities in chironomid egg masses and larvae.ISME J.721472158. 10.1038/ismej.2013.100

  • 60

    Senderovich Y. Gershtein Y. Halewa E. Halpern M. (2008). Vibrio cholerae and Aeromonas: do they share a mutual host?ISME J.2276283. 10.1038/ismej.2007.114

  • 61

    Shaikhutdinov N. Gogoleva N. Gusev O. Shagimardanova E. (2020). Microbiota composition data of imago and larval stage of the anhydrobiotic midge.Data Brief33:106527. 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106527

  • 62

    Sood A. Renuka N. Prasanna R. Ahluwalia A. S. (2015). “Cyanobacteria as potential options for wastewater treatment,” in Phytoremediation, edsAnsariA. A.GillS. S.GillR.LanzaG. R.NewmanL. (Cham: Springer), 8393. 10.1007/978-3-319-10969-5_8

  • 63

    Steinberg C. E. W. Lorenz R. Spieser O. H. (1995). Effects of atrazine on swimming behavior of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio.Water Res.29981985. 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00217-U

  • 64

    Sylvestre M. (1995). Biphenyl/Chlorobiphenyls catabolic pathway of Comamonas testosteroni B-356: prospect for use in bioremediation.Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation35189211. 10.1016/0964-8305(95)00034-3

  • 65

    Tan B. Nesbø C. Foght J. (2014). Re-analysis of omics data indicates Smithella may degrade alkanes by addition to fumarate under methanogenic conditions.ISME J.823532356. 10.1038/ismej.2014.87

  • 66

    Thorat L. Nath B. B. (2015). Tolerance to desiccation stress in Chironomus ramosus through plasticity in homeostatic control.Eur. J. Environ. Sci.58691.

  • 67

    Virk A. P. Capalash N. Sharma P. (2012). An alkalophilic laccase from Rheinheimera species isolate: production and biobleaching of kraft pulp.Biotechnol. Prog.2814261431. 10.1002/btpr.1619

  • 68

    Volpicella M. Costanza A. Palumbo O. Italiano F. Claudia L. Placido A. et al (2014). Rhodobacter sphaeroides adaptation to high concentrations of cobalt ions requires energetic metabolism changes.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.88345357.

  • 69

    Watanabe N. Harada S. Komai Y. (2000). Long-term recovery from mine drainage disturbance of a macroinvertebrate community in the Ichi-kawa River, Japan.Hydrobiologia429171180. 10.1023/A:1004027201667

  • 70

    Williams P. A. Sayers J. R. (1994). The evolution of pathways for aromatic hydrocarbon oxidation in Pseudomonas.Biodegradation5195217.

  • 71

    Winner R. Bossel M. Farrel M. (1980). Insect community structure as an index of heavy-metal pollution in lotic ecosystems.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.37647655. 10.1139/f80-081

  • 72

    Wright I. A. Burgin S. (2009). Effects of organic and heavy metal pollution on chironomids within a pristine upland catchment.Hydrobiologia635:15. 10.1007/s10750-009-9857-y

  • 73

    Wu S. Wang L. Gan R. Tong T. Bian H. Li Z. et al (2018). Signature arsenic detoxification pathways in Halomonas sp. strain GFAJ-1.mBio9:e00515-18. 10.1128/mBio.00515-18

Summary

Keywords

Chironomus , microbiome, microbiota, toxicants, holobiont

Citation

Sela R and Halpern M (2022) The Chironomid Microbiome Plays a Role in Protecting Its Host From Toxicants. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10:796830. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.796830

Received

17 October 2021

Accepted

12 January 2022

Published

15 February 2022

Volume

10 - 2022

Edited by

Adi Behar, Kimron Veterinary Institute, Israel

Reviewed by

Bruno Gomez-Gil, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Mexico; Kar Wai Hong, University of Malaya, Malaysia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Malka Halpern,

This article was submitted to Coevolution, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics