Abstract
Introduction:
Hyponatremia often occurs during the practice of endurance sports. We evaluated the impact on hyponatremia of the hydration recommendations of the Third International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus Development Conference 2015 (3IE-AHCD) during the 2017 Gran Trail de Peñalara marathon (GTP) and the Vitoria Gasteiz Ironman triathlon (VGI).
Methods:
Prospective study of GTP and VGI athletes participating in four information sessions in the months prior to the events, to explain that hydration should only be according to their level of thirst, per the recommendations of the 3IE-AHCD. Consenting event finishers were included in final analysis. Pre- and post-race anthropometric and biochemical parameters were compared.
Results:
Thirty-six GTP (33 male) and 94 VGI (88 male) finishers were evaluated. GTP race median fluid intake was 800 ml/h, with 900 ml/h in the VGI race. 83.3% GTPfin and 77.6% VGIfin remained eunatremic (blood sodium 135–145 mmol/L). Only 1/36 GTP and 1/94 VGI participant finished in hyponatremia, both with a sodium level of 134 mmol/L. Fourteen percent of GTP, and 21.2% of VGI participants finished in hypernatremia, with no increase in race completion times. No participating athlete required medical attention, except for musculoskeletal complaints. Pro-BNP and Copeptin levels rose significantly. Changes in copeptin levels did not correlate with changes in plasma osmolality, nor total body water content in impedance analysis.
Conclusions:
Recommending that athletes' fluid intake in endurance events be a function of their thirst almost entirely prevented development of hyponatremia, without induction of clinically significant hypernatremia, or a negative repercussion on race completion times.
Introduction
Hyponatremia often occurs during physical exercise, particularly during the practice of endurance sports (1–4). One of the postulated causes is an excess consumption of fluids. In fact, athletes taking part in long-distance events are often worried that their fluid intake (FI) will be insufficient, inducing them to drink in excess (5). The problem can be exacerbated by a reduction in the urine water excretion due to exercise-induced non-osmotic secretion of the antidiuretic hormone, arginine vasopressin (AVP). Indeed, exercise-induced hyponatremia is one of the most important medical problems encountered during marathons, ultra-marathons and Ironman distance triathlons, since it can be lethal. In fact, incidences ranging from 15 to 30% have been reported, and sodium levels below 120 mmol/L found in ~1% of athletes (1, 2, 6).
The optimum level of hydration for athletes participating in ultra-endurance events is a subject of controversy (7). Prior to the 1980's, athletes were encouraged to avoid consuming liquids while competing, which led to many experiencing dehydration and hypernatremia (8, 9). Over the next 20 years, they were encouraged to do the opposite, with recommendations emphasizing negative consequences of dehydration (8–10). However, this served to increase the incidence of hyponatremia, especially in the United States (11–14). In fact, more recent studies highlight the problems associated with hyperhydration (3, 5, 7, 15). The death of a triathlete due to cerebral edema during the 2015 Frankfurt European Ironman Championship, and the description of other fatal cases of acute hyponatremia owed to excessive FI, has alerted organizers of ultra-distance events, and re-opened the debate over the risk of hyponatremia vs. inadequate hydration strategies (5, 7).
Fluid losses through sweat and urine are highly dynamic, and vary from one athlete to the next. Furthermore, the type of sport, and weather, as well as volemia, will influence an individual athlete's needs for fluid replacement. Simply indicating that athletes drink as much as possible, or recommending fixed ranges of fluid intake, do not take these factors into account.
The Third International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus Development Conference 2015 (3IE-AHCD) recommends that athletes should drink according to thirst (5)—no more, no less. The 3IE-AHCD also recommends placing provisioning posts every 5 km. in foot races, and every 20 km. in cycling races. Drinking when thirsty would permit the principal physiological factors involved in regulating body water, thirst and AVP secretion, to remain in control of water homeostasis.
The present study assesses the effect of the hydration recommendations for athletes made by the 3IE-AHCD on the incidence of hyponatremia. The events chosen for this analysis were the Gran Trail de Peñalara (GTP) and the Vitoria-Gasteiz Ironman (VGI) competitions. These two events were chosen given their prestige, quality of organization, and difficulty, as well as their similarity to events studied in prior articles on sports hyponatremia. Athletes were provided with the 3IE-AHCD recommendations, and thus encouraged to hydrate only when thirsty.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Subjects
Data for this prospective study were collected during the GTP and VGI competitions held on June 23rd and July 9th 2017, respectively. The study subjects were 18–65-year-old athletes/triathletes federated in Spain, recruited with the help of the Schools of Medicine and Physical Education of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, the Innovation Unit of the San Carlos Health Research Institute, and the Pediatric and Endocrinology Departments of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC). Four information sessions were held with registered participants in the months prior to the events, to explain that they should only hydrate according to their level of thirst, as per the recommendations of the 3IE-AHCD. These recommendations were also e-mailed to all the subjects and posted on the event organizers' webpages and social networks (Supplementary Material). The day before each race, athletes were asked to agree to take part in the study. Only those signing the informed consent form and finishing their race were included in the final analysis. Figure 1 provides an overview of participants recruited and the analysis that was performed.
Figure 1

Algorithm of participant selection for the study. Basic parameters were as follows: medical history, demographic, fluid and salt intake, biometrics, impedance analysis, whole blood electrolytes and glucose, and calculated effective plasma osmolality. Additional parameters were as follows: measured plasma osmolality, serum copeptin, pro-BNP, urea, creatinine, leucocytes, Hemoglobin, hematocrit. Urine parameters were as follows: osmolality, sodium, and potassium.
The Gran Trail de Peñalara Race
In recent years, the popularity of mountain races covering very long distances and involving large changes in altitude—known as “trail” or “ultra-trail” events—has increased. These foot-races cover up to 166 km. and take place over mountain tracks. In 2010, the Real Sociedad Española de Alpinismo Peñalara inaugurated the GTP race in the Guadarrama sierra of Madrid. The race provides participants with points toward competing in the Mont Blanc Ultra-Trail race, considered the World Championship Ultra Trail event.
The GTP race is a circular, semi-self-sufficiency competition, covering 114 km, ranging from 1,315 to 2,428 m above sea level (m.o.s.l.), accumulated altitude gain: 4,474 m. Participants carry the minimum material guaranteeing their safety, with 30 h to complete the distance. Ten provisioning posts 5–10 km apart were set up along the route, providing water, Coca-Cola™ (1 mmol Na/100 mL), Aquarius™ (1 mmol Na/100 mL), Powerade™ (3.9 mmol Na/100 mL), salt tablets (200 mg NaCl), fruit, and energy bars. Maximum environmental temperature reached 33°C. Relative humidity was 61%. The event started at 6.30 AM. Sixty of the 200 athletes starting the race signed the Informed Consent Form.
The Vitoria Gasteiz Ironman Race
This event, one of the most anticipated in Spain, is comparable to the most important European Ironman-length triathlons. Like other Ironman triathlons, it involves a 3,800 m swim, a 180 km cycling race, and a 42.2 km race on foot. Altitude ranges from 508 to 613 m.o.s.l. Provisioning stations were placed every 20 km of the cycling race and every 5 km of the race on foot, providing similar liquid, salt, and food resources as the GTP. Environmental temperature reached 31°C. Relative humidity was 57%. The event started at 7.30 AM. Of the 1,100 subjects starting the race, 112 signed the IFC.
Data Collection
Demographic data and medical history were collected via questionnaire on the eve of the races. Biometric parameters and blood for biochemical measurements for analysis were collected 12–24 h prior to the races (“baseline”) in all consenting participants, and within 30 min of successful race completion. Urine samples were collected 15–90 min post-race. Post-race parameters included self-reported information on fluid and salt tablet intake. Pre- and post-race analysis was performed in all finishers, and included whole blood glucose, sodium, and potassium levels (VITROS 5600 Integrated System), as well as weight and height (stadiometer), and total body water (impedance analysis by an INBODY 270 device).
In all GTP finishers, and in a random sampling of 18 VGI finishers pre and post-race analysis of the following additional parameters was also performed: Hb, Hematocrit, leukocytes, serum urea and creatinine (Sysmex Xe-2100 analyzer) Plasma Osmolality (POsm) and Urine Osmolality (UOsm; Advanced Instruments 3300 osmometer), urine electrolytes (Beckman Coulter AU5800 analyzer), serum Copeptin (enzyme immunoassay using Cloud Clone reagents), and serum Pro-BNP (immunoluminescence using a Roche Elecsys E-170). Effective POsm (EPOsm) was calculated: 2xBNa+ + [blood glucose (mg/dL)/18]. Participants failing to complete their race were excluded (Figure 1).
Hyponatremia was defined as a total blood sodium level (BNa+) <135 mmol/L after correction for glycemia. Hypernatremia was defined as BNa+ >145 mmol/L, eunatremia as BNa+ 135–145 mmol/L.
Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables were expressed as frequency rates, with group comparisons done by Chi-square tests for categorical variables. Continuous variables were described as mean (±standard deviation) when parametric, or median [interquartile range] if non-parametric, as indicated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Shapiro-Wilk test. When a numeric variable was below the detection level of the assay, the lower limit of detection was used for statistical analysis. Comparative analysis of the quantitative variables was performed using Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests when non-parametric, and Student's T-test or ANOVA tests when parametric. Correlation studies, with Pearson's or Spearman's method, were also performed, for parametric and non-parametric variables, respectively. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05 in two-tailed analysis. SPSS 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y.) was used for analysis.
Ethical Statement
All included subjects signed the ICF. Subject data were anonymized and protected in application of Spanish legislation. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics and Clinical Research Committee of the HCSC (internal code 17/018-E). Participants were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.
Results
Thirty-six of the initial 60 enrolled GTP athletes completed the event, of which 33 (91.6%) were male. Mean finishing time was 18:20 h (range: 14:13–22:27 h). Ninety-four of the initial 112 consenting VGI athletes completed the race, of which 88 (93.6%) were male. All athletes that did not finish their race were excluded from analysis. Mean finishing time was 11:20 h (range: 8:92–13:48 h). No participant declared comorbidities or drug consumption. All race finishers reported drinking fluids without thirst before the race, and only when thirsty during the race. No athlete, regardless of whether they finished their race or not, was attended by the medical team for anything other than musculoskeletal complaints.
Table 1 displays parameters measured pre- and post-race in the entire group of finishers as classified by each race. Table 2 displays additional pre- and post-race biochemical data of all GTP and 18 VGI finishers, both according to race and grouped together.
Table 1
| Total | Gran Trail de Peñalara | Vitoria Gasteiz Ironman race | pa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 130) | (N = 36) | (N = 94) | ||
| Age, years | 38 [33–43] | 39 [31–44] | 38 [33–43] | 0.779 |
| Sex male, n (%) | 121 (93.1) | 33 (91.7) | 88 (93.6) | 0.695 |
| Height, cm | 176.3 ± 7 | 175 [169–180] | 178 [172–182] | 0.025* |
| Weight (kg) pre-race | 71.9 ± 8.4 | 70.6 ± 7.8 | 72.5 ± 8.7 | 0.240 |
| Weight (kg) post-race | 69.4 ± 8 | 68.3 ± 7.5 | 69.9 ± 8.3 | 0.301 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| BMI (kg/m2) pre-race | 23.1 ± 1.7 | 23.3 ± 1.7 | 23 ± 1.8 | 0.499 |
| BMI (kg/m2) post-race | 22.3 ± 1.7 | 22.5 ± 1.7 | 22.2 ± 1.7 | 0.379 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| TBW (L) pre-race | 46.3 [41.9–49.1] | 45.1 [40.3–48.2] | 46.8 [42.8–50] | 0.030* |
| TBW (L) post-race | 45.5 [41.2–48.3] | 44.7 [40.2–47.8] | 45.7 [41.7–48.8] | 0.147 |
| pb | <0.001* | 0.623 | <0.001* | |
| Finishing time (hh:min) | - | 18:20 [14:13–22:27] | 11:20 [8:52–13:48] | 0.01* |
| Fluid intake (ml/h) | 900 [700–1,100] | 800 [625–1,000] | 900 [700–1,100] | 0.639 |
| Fluid intake (ml/BMI/h) | 39.2 [30.1–49.2] | 36 [27.8–43.4] | 40 [31.8–49.8] | 0.078 |
| Salt intake (g) | 6.2 ± 5.9 | 9.1 ± 7.7 | 5 ± 4.7 | <0.001* |
| Whole blood parameters | ||||
| Na+ (mmol/L) pre-race | 139 [138–141] | 140 [138–141] | 139 [138–140] | 0.037* |
| Na+ (mmol/L) post-race | 143 [141–145] | 142 [140–145] | 143 [141–145] | 0.333 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| Hyponatremia, n (%) | 2 (1.5) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (1) | 1 |
| Hypernatremia, n (%) | 25 (19.2) | 5 (13.9) | 20 (21.3) | 0.458 |
| K+ (mmol/L) pre-race | 4.6 [4.2–5] | 5.1 [4.6–5.4] | 4.5 [4–4.8] | <0.001* |
| K+ (mmol/L) post-race | 4.6 [4.3–5] | 5 [4.4–5.2] | 4.5 [4.3–4.9] | 0.003* |
| pb | 0.614 | 0.052 | 0.089 | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) pre-race | 84 [77–90] | 85 [78–90] | 84 [77–90] | 0.765 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) post-race | 103 [88–118] | 102 [89–121] | 104 [86–117] | 0.617 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| EPOsm (mOsm/kg) pre-race | 283 [281–286] | 284 [281–287] | 283 [280–285] | 0.054 |
| EPOsm (mOsm/kg) post-race | 291 [286–296] | 291 [285–295] | 292 [287–296] | 0.474 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
Pre-and post-race parameters in of finishers as classified by race.
Comparison between GTP and GIV.
Comparison between pre- and post-race.
p < 0.05.
Quantitative parameters are expressed in mean (± standard deviation) or median [interquartile range].
BMI, body mass index; TBW, total body water; Na+, sodium, K+, potassium; EPOsm, effective plasma osmolality.
Table 2
| Total | Gran Trail de Peñalara | Vitoria Gasteiz Ironman race | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 54) | (N = 36) | (N = 18) | |
| Additional blood parameters | |||
| POsm (mOsm/kg) pre-race | 304 ± 4 | 304.3 ± 4.5 | 303.3 ± 4.2 |
| POsm (mOsm/kg) post-race | 316 ± 7 | 315.7 ± 7.3 | 316.4 ± 7.6 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| Serum Copeptin pre-race (pmol/L)a | <15 | <15 | <15 |
| Copeptin post-race (pmol/L) | 88.5 [79.6–98.5] | 86.5 [79.3–99.2] | 90.6 [80.5–98.5] |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| Serum Pro-BNP (pg/ml) pre-race | 20 [18–30] | 22 [18–31.8] | 20 [20–22] |
| Pro-BNP (pg/ml) post-race | 197 [117–414] | 262 [112–519.3] | 154 [118–221.3] |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| Serum Urea (mg/dl) pre-race | 41.9 ± 8.3 | 41.4 ± 7.8 | 42.8 ± 9.4 |
| Urea (mg/dl) post-race | 61.2 ± 13.8 | 65.3 ± 13.7 | 52.9 ± 9.7 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | 0.001* |
| Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) pre-race | 0.9 [0.8–1] | 0.9 [0.8–1] | 0.9 [0.7–1] |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) post-race | 1.1 [1.1–1.4] | 1.1 [1.1–1.4] | 1.2 [1.1–1.3] |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| Leucocytes (x103) pre-race | 5.8 [5.1–7] | 5.9 [5.3–7.5] | 5.4 [4.9–6.1] |
| Leucocytes (x103) post-race | 14.7 [12.9–16.4] | 14.1 [12.2–15.9] | 16.1 [14.9–17.4] |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) pre-race | 15.1 [14.3–15.7] | 14.8 [14.2–15.4] | 15.7 [14.6–16.1] |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) post-race | 15.2 [14.3–15.7] | 15 [14.1–15.6] | 15.3 [14.6–15.9] |
| pb | 0.718 | 0.619 | 0.154 |
| Hematocrit (%) pre-race | 45.1 ± 3 | 44.4 ± 2.6 | 46.7 ± 2.9 |
| Hematocrit (%) post-race | 44.3 ± 3 | 43.8 ± 2.9 | 45.3 ± 2.6 |
| pb | 0.003* | 0.099 | 0.003* |
| Urine post-race parameters | |||
| Osmolality (mOsm/kg) post-race | 908 [786–1033] | 974 [855–1060] | 822 [664–881] |
| Na+ (mmol/L) | 68 [34–118] | 66 [37–132] | 68 [32–105] |
| K+ (mmol/L) | 154 [128–210] | 158 [129–225] | 149 [124–156] |
Additional pre- and post-race parameters of athletes both grouped together and as classified by race.
All copeptin levels were below 15 pmol/L. For statistical analysis, a value of 15 was used.
Comparison of pre and post-race parameters.
p < 0.05.
Quantitative parameters are expressed in mean (±standard deviation) or median [interquartile range].
POsm, plasma osmolality as measured by osmometer; Na+, sodium; K+, potassium.
Fluid Intake and Body Water Content
The median FI of the GTP and VGI athletes is shown in Table 1. In GTP, 19 of the 36 finishers (53%) drank 400–800 ml/h, as did 29 of the 94 finishing athletes (31%) in VGI. No athlete consumed <400 ml/h, nor >1,500 ml/h in either race. Analyzing both events together, we found a positive correlation between post-race TBW and FI in ml/h (r = 0.316, p < 0.001) and in ml/BMI/h (r = 0.175, p = 0.046).
GTP athletes presented a positive correlation between post-race BW and post-race TBW (r = 0.87, p < 0.001), and between the change in BW and that of TBW (r = 0.75, p < 0.001). Similarly, for VGI triathletes in the same variables: r = 0.91, p < 0.001; and r = 0.74, p < 0.001, respectively.
Four of the 36 (11.1%) GTPfin maintained their BW (i.e., less than a −1 to +1% change pre- to post-race), as did six of the 94 (6.3%) of VGIfin. No subject gained weight. Twelve (33%) of the 36 GTPfin lost between 1 and 3% of their BW, as did 31 of the 94 (33%) of VGIfin. Twenty of the 36 (56%) GTPfin lost >3% of BW, as did 57/94 (61%) of VGIfin. The maximum recorded loss was 5.2%. The highest EPOsm recorded in those with a loss >3% of BW was 305 mOsm/kg in GTP, and 307 mOsm/kg in VGIfin.
Post-race Hyponatremia and Hypernatremia
One hundred and three (79.2%) of the 130 finishers of either event remained eunatremic: GTP: 30/36 (83.3%), VGI: 73/94 (77.6%). Only 2 of the 130 (1.5%) athletes developed hyponatremia, GTP: 1/36 (2.8%), VGI: 1/94 (1%) (Figure 2). Characteristics of athletes developing hyponatremia are described in Table 3.
Figure 2

Total incidence of hyponatremia and hypernatremia during both races.
Table 3
| GTP athlete | VGI athlete | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 30 | 39 |
| Sex | Female | Male |
| Finishing time (hh:min) | 20:59 | 12:35 |
| Fluid intake (ml/h) | 600 | 700 |
| Fluid intake (ml/BMI/h) | 29 | 27.6 |
| Salt intake (g) | 7 | 5.6 |
| Impedance and biometric parameters | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) pre-race | 20.7 | 25.4 |
| Weight (kg) pre-race | 55 | 73.3 |
| Weight (kg) post-race | 54.3 | 71.5 |
| Weight change (%) | −1.3 | −2.5 |
| TBW (L) pre-race | 29.9 | 46.2 |
| TBW (L) post-race | 30.6 | 46 |
| TBW change (%) | +2.34 | −0.4 |
| BW% pre-race | 54.3 | 63 |
| BW% post-race | 56.3 | 64.3 |
| BW% change (%) | +3.7 | +2.1 |
| Blood parameters | ||
| Na+ (mmol/L) pre-race | 137 | 137 |
| Na+ (mmol/L) post-race | 134 | 134 |
| K+ (mmol/L) pre-race | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| K+ (mmol/L) post-race | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) pre-race | 80 | 76 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) post-race | 125 | 102 |
| EPOsm (mOsm/kg) pre-race | 278 | 278 |
| EPOsm (mOsm/kg) post-race | 275 | 274 |
| Copeptin (pmol/L) pre-race | <15 | No data |
| Copeptin (pmol/L) post-race | 145 | No data |
| Pro-BNP (pg/ml) pre-race | 18 | No data |
| Pro-BNP (pg/ml) post-race | 505 | No data |
| Urea (mg/dl) pre-race | 28 | No data |
| Urea (mg/dl) post-race | 65 | No data |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) pre-race | 0.7 | No data |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) post-race | 1.5 | No data |
| Urine parameters | ||
| Na+ (mmol/L) | 20 | No data |
| Osmolality (mOsm/kg) | 511 | No data |
| K+ (mmol/L) | 118 | No data |
Characteristics of the athletes who developed hyponatremia.
BMI, body mass index; TBW, total body water; BW%, percentage of body water; Na+, sodium; K+, potassium; EPOsm, effective plasma osmolality.
Hypernatremia was observed in 25 of the 130 (19.2%) athletes completing their race, as follows: GTP: 5 of the 36 (14%), VGI: 20 of the 94 (21.2%). No subject presented a BNa+ >150 mmol/L. Univariate analysis comparing parameters of eunatremic and hypernatremic athletes are presented in Tables 4, 5.
Table 4
| Eunatremia | Hypernatremia | pa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 103) | (N = 25) | ||
| Age, years | 38. [33–45] | 38 [34–42] | 0.962 |
| Sex Male, n (%) | 95 (92.2) | 25 (100) | 0.15 |
| Race | 0.358 | ||
| VGI, n (%) | 73 (70.9) | 20 (21.) | |
| GTP, n (%) | 30 (29.1) | 5 (14) | |
| Weight (kg) pre-race | 71.4 ± 8.5 | 75.1 ± 7.2 | 0.030* |
| Weight (kg) post-race | 69 ± 8.2 | 71.7 ± 6.9 | 0.099 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| Weight loss (kg) | −2.3 ± 1.2 | −3.4 ± 1.1 | <0.001* |
| Weight loss (%) | 3.3 ± 1.6 | 4.5 ± 1.3 | <0.001* |
| BMI (kg/m2) pre-race | 23.1 ± 1.7 | 23.3 ± 1.7 | 0.577 |
| BMI (kg/m2) post-race | 22.3 ± 1.7 | 22.2 ± 1.6 | 0.81 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| TBW (L) pre-race | 46 [41.1–48.9] | 47.2 [45.4–50] | 0.074 |
| TBW (L) post-race | 45.2 [41–48.5] | 46.6 [44.5–48.2] | 0.222 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| Change in TBW (L) | −0.54 ± 1.3 | −1.33 ± 1 | 0.001* |
| Change in TBW (%) | 1.1 ± 2.7 | 2.7 ± 1.9 | 0.001* |
| Fluid intake (ml/h) | 900 [700–1,100] | 900 [750–1,150] | 0.848 |
| Fluid intake (ml/BMI/h) | 39.5 [30.1–49.4] | 38.9 [32.2–46.7] | 0.739 |
| Whole blood parameters | |||
| Na+ (mmol/L) pre-race | 139 [138–141] | 140 [139–141] | 0.279 |
| Na+ (mmol/L) post-race | 142 [140–144] | 147 [146–149] | <0.001* |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| Change in Na+ (mmol/L) | 2.5 ± 2.8 | 7.8 ± 2.3 | <0.001* |
| K+ (mmol/L) pre-race | 4.6 [4.2–5.1] | 4.5 [4.1–4.9] | 0.414 |
| K+ (mmol/L) post-race | 4.7 [4.3–5] | 4.5 [4.2–5.1] | 0.575 |
| pb | 0.076 | 0.412 | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) pre-race | 84 [78–90] | 84 [74–88] | 0.743 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) post-race | 103 [84–117] | 104 [95–121] | 0.503 |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| EPOsm (mOsm/kg) pre-race | 283 [281–286] | 284 [281–287] | 0.342 |
| EPOsm (mOsm/kg) post-race | 290 [286–294] | 301 [298–303] | <0.001* |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* |
Comparison of parameters of eunatremic and hypernatremic finishers.
Comparison between Eunatremia and hypernatremia.
Comparison between pre- and post-race.
p < 0.05.
Quantitative parameters are expressed in mean (±standard deviation) or median [interquartile range].
VGI, Vitoria-Gasteiz Ironman; GTP, Grand Trial of Peñalara; BMI, body mass index; TBW, total body water; Na+, sodium; K+, potassium; EPOsm, effective plasma osmolality.
Table 5
| Eunatremia | Hypernatremia | pa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 41) | (N = 12) | ||
| Additional blood parameters | |||
| POsm (mOsm/kg) pre-race | 303.6 ± 3.8 | 306 ± 4.8 | 0.133 |
| POsm (mOsm/kg) post-race | 313.8 ± 6 | 324.4 ± 3.2 | <0.001* |
| pb | <0.001* | <0.001* | |
| Change in POsm (mOsm/kg) | 10.2 ± 6.2 | 18.4 ± 5.8 | <0.001* |
| Copeptin pre-race (pmol/L)c | <15 | <15 | 1 |
| Copeptin post-race (pmol/L) | 89 [80.1–97.2] | 85.6 [79.1–99.2] | 0.524 |
| pb | <0.001* | 0.002* | |
| Change in Copeptin (pmol/L) | 74 [65.1–82.2] | 70.6 [64.1–84.2] | 0.524 |
| Pro-BNP (pg/ml) pre-race | 20 [18–31.5] | 20 [20–29.8] | 0.974 |
| Pro-BNP (pg/ml) post-race | 241 [134–470.5] | 125.5 [81–197.8] | 0.026* |
| pb | <0.001* | 0.002* | |
| Change in Pro-BNP (pg/ml) | 201 [114–437.5] | 105 [58.8–174.8] | 0.025* |
| Urea (mg/dl) pre-race | 41.5 ± 8 | 44.3 ± 8.7 | 0.345 |
| Urea (mg/dl) post-race | 62.4 ± 15.2 | 56.8 ± 6 | 0.063 |
| pb | <0.001* | 0.001* | |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) pre-race | 0.9 [0.8–1] | 0.9 [0.8–1] | 0.331 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) post-race | 1.1 [1.1–1.4] | 1.2 [1.1–1.4] | 0.236 |
| pb | <0.001 | 0.002 | |
| Leucocytes (x103) pre-race | 6 [5.1–7.3] | 5.4 [5.2–6.3] | 0.438 |
| Leucocytes (x103) post-race | 14.2 [12.2–16.1] | 15.7 [14.9–17.4] | 0.019 |
| pb | <0.001* | 0.002* | |
| Hematocrit (%) pre-race | 44.9 ± 3 | 46.1 ± 2.6 | 0.207 |
| Hematocrit (%) post-race | 43.9 ± 2.9 | 45.8 ± 2.7 | 0.051 |
| pb | 0.003* | 0.268 | |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) pre-race | 14.8 [14.2–15.7] | 15.5 [15–15.9] | 0.238 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) post-race | 14.9 [14.1–15.6] | 15.3 [15.1–16] | 0.104 |
| pb | 0.286 | 0.344 | |
| Urine post-race parameters | |||
| Osmolality (mOsm/kg) | 901 [726–1049] | 957 [869–1007] | 0.294 |
| Na+ (mmol/L) | 56 [34–95] | 107 [57–144] | 0.085 |
| K+ (mmol/L) | 155 [129–206] | 148 [125–276] | 0.79 |
Additional parameters of athletes classified as eunatremic or hypernatremic at the end of their race.
Comparison of parameters of athletes finishing in eunatremia vs. hypernatremia.
Comparison of parameters pre- and post-race.
Copeptin levels were indetectable in all finishers. For statistical analysis, a value of 15 pmol/L was used.
p < 0.05.
Quantitative parameters are expressed in mean (± standard deviation) or median [interquartile range].
POsm, plasma osmolality; Na+, sodium; K+, potassium.
No significant difference in mean salt intake was observed between athletes developing hypernatremia and those remaining eunatremic in GTP (5.350 vs. 9.730 g, p = 0.180) nor in VGI (4.510 vs. 5.240 g, p = 0.671). Salt intake was not correlated with BNa+ levels in either event.
The mean BNa+ increment was higher in those losing >3% of BW than in those who did not, both in GTP (3.65 ± 3.06 vs. 0.87 ± 3.1 mmol/L, p = 0.012) and VGIfin (4.94 ± 3.21 vs. 2.1 ± 3.1 mmol/L, p < 0.001). In both GTP and VGIfin, the change in BNa+ was negatively correlated with the change in BW (r = −0.486, p = 0.03; and r = −0.469, p < 0.001, respectively) and with the change in TBW (r = −0.235, p = 0.017; and r = −0.286, p = 0.005, respectively).
EPOsm increased over both races, in GTPfin: 2.2 ± 2.5% (range: −2.9–7.2), and VGIfin: 3.1 ± 2.5% (range: −3–8.9).
However, six (16.6%) GTPfin and 10 (10.6%) VGIfin experienced a fall in EPOsm. In athletes showing a EPOsm descent, BNa+ fell a mean of −2.7 ± 1 mmol/L (range:−4 to−1) in GTPfin, and −1.8 ± 1.2 mmol/L (range:−4 to 0) in VGIfin. BW also decreased a mean of −2.1 ± 1.7% (range: 0.1 to−4) in these GTPfin, and −1.8 ± 1.2% (range: 0 to−3.3) in these VGIfin. TBW decreased a mean of −0.5 ± 2.7% (range: 1.1 to−2.1) in GTP, but increased a mean of 0.5 ± 2.4% (range:−4.4 to 3.9) in VGIfin. Median FI in ml/h as well as in ml/BMI/h was not significantly different when comparing those showing a decrease in EPOsm with those who did not (931 vs. 933 ml/h, p = 0.596; and 39.7 vs. 40.6 ml/BMI/h, p = 0.789, respectively).
The median GTP finishing time was lower in participants developing hypernatremia than in those remaining eunatremic (17:34 h vs. 19:36 h, p = 0.018). In the VGI group, statistical differences between the finishing time medians of these subgroups were not observed (10:45 h vs. 10:46 h, p = 0.874). When the finishing time of those who lost >3% of BW was compared to those who did not, no differences were found in GTPfin (p = 0.314) nor VGIfin (p = 0.860).
Additional Biochemical Parameters
In both GTP and VGI participants, copeptin was below detection level at baseline, ascending significatively post-race. No differences in copeptin levels between hypernatremic and eunatremic athletes were found. Participants showing a descent in BNa+ also had an elevation in copeptin levels. The change in copeptin levels did not correlate with BNa+, TBW, POsm, EPOsm, nor their changes from pre- to post-race.
Pro-BNP increased significantly during both races. However, the median Pro-BNP increment was lower in hypernatremic than eunatremic finishers of the entire group (125.5 vs. 241 pg/ml, p = 0.026). In VGIfin, a negative correlation was detected between Pro-BNP and copeptin concentrations (r = −0.400, p = 0.040), but not among GTPfin (r = 0.02, p = 0.910) nor in the entire group.
Discussion
Our findings indicate that athletes hydrating according to 3IE-AHCD recommendations present a low incidence of hyponatremia, as compared with the findings of previous studies, without an increase in marked hypernatremia (1, 2, 6). Drinking according-to-thirst permits a FI tailored to the athlete's specific needs. This contrasts with recommendations for specific quantities of FI (“one-size-fits-all”) (5, 7).
Only 2 of the 126 (1.6%) athletes developed post-race hyponatremia (rate of 15 per 1,000). In both cases, hyponatremia was mild (134 mmol/L). These results contrast with the incidences ranging from 13 to 51% described in previous studies of similar sporting events (14, 16–25). The 15% hyponatremia rate at the Ironman European Championship event in Frankfurt 2017 is of particular note, given its similar characteristics to the VGI race (26). In the current study, drinking according-to-thirst, with specific placing of provisioning posts, almost entirely prevented development of hyponatremia in athletes completing their race.
The median FI of the athletes was 800 ml/h in GTPfin, and 900 ml/h in VGIfin, ranging from 400 to 1,500 ml/h and 500–1,500 ml/h, respectively. No athlete drank more than 1,500 ml/h, a risk factor for hyponatremia (27). However, athletes are often told to drink more than what thirst indicates. Many webpages encourage athletes to drink large amounts of liquid over short periods of time, with potentially fatal consequences (16, 19, 20, 28, 29). Hoffman et al. (21) reported the low quality of information on internet, even on webpages considered 'scientific'. In fact, only 7.3% of 110 webpages highlighted the need to drink according-to-thirst. Only 50% mentioned the risk of hyponatremia produced by excessive FI. Others recommend a FI of 400–800 ml/h during exercise (30). Yet, in the current study, the FI rate of 47% of GTPfin and 69 % of VGIfin was outside of this recommended range.
FI should be based on thirst, the physiological mechanism that determines the volume of liquid to be ingested. Thirst, together with AVP, exert a control of water homeostasis so precise (22) that EPOsm is normally maintained within strict limits (27). In fact, in the current study, no athlete had a post-race EPOsm ≥308 mOsm/kg. Non-thirst-based fluid recommendations are unphysiological, and do not take into account specific characteristics of athletes/races.
We observed a hypernatremia rate within the previously described range from 2 to 52% (31–34), with 14% in GTPfin and 21% in VGIfin. The development of hypernatremia did not appear to negatively affect athletic performance, as based on race-completion times. In fact, although no differences were observed between finishing times of hypernatremic and eunatremic athletes in VGI, the finishing time of GTP athletes developing hypernatremia was actually better than in those eunatremic. All athletes presented a BNa+ <150 mmol/L. Furthermore, no athlete was attended by the medical team for reasons other than musculoskeletal complaints. Thus, hypernatremia, when present, was mild, and not clinically apparent.
A majority of VGI (61%) and GTP (56%) finishers lost >3% of BW, but only one athlete presented >5% weight loss (5.2%). Although a BW loss >3% can be considered clinically significant, no athlete in this group presented a EPOsm >307 mOsm/kg, none collapsed, nor did any require medical attention upon race completion. Furthermore, as was the case for athletes with hypernatremia, there was no apparent negative impact on their athletic performance, as based on race-completion times.
Urinary sodium concentrations [UNa+] confirm that the hypernatremic runners were not hypovolemic. The median [UNa+] of 107 mmol/L, with no athlete presenting a level below 32 mmol/L, indicates a normal effective circulating volume. Had they been hypovolemic, [UNa+] would have been below 30 mmol/L.
The failure of athletes to replace 100% of BW losses from ad libitum FI has been described as “involuntary” or “voluntary” dehydration (35, 36). Laboratory and field data, however, suggest that the body primarily defends POsm, and not body water during prolonged endurance exercise (37–44). Furthermore, complete replacement of fluid loss is accompanied by a reduction in BNa+ during prolonged endurance exercise (45–48), without offering any performance benefit (48, 49). In the current study, a minority of athletes in both events showed a post-race EPOsm reduction, accompanied by a fall in BNa+. This occurred despite the majority of them presenting BW losses and having a FI similar to those not showing a EPOsm reduction. These findings elucidate the risk of hyponatremia behind an excessive FI. If the aforementioned athletes had consumed fluids with a goal of replacing 100% of BW loss, many more participants could have become hyponatremic.
Copeptin, a marker for AVP secretion (50–52), rose from undetectable levels pre-race in all participants to markedly high levels post-race. The low pre-race copeptin levels can be explained by the fact that all athletes drank without thirst during the 24 h prior to the race, thus inhibiting AVP/copeptin secretion (30). High post-race copeptin and urine osmolality levels were found even in athletes exhibiting a reduction in BNa+, ruling out excessive fluid intake as the driving force behind the sodium descent in these individuals. We found no correlation between POsm or EPOsm and post-race copeptin levels, nor between their changes, nor was copeptin correlated with BNa+ or TBW. These findings were to be expected, since the secretion of AVP, and thus copeptin, from the posterior pituitary is influenced by many non-osmotic stimuli that occur during exercise, including nausea, pain, stress, cytokines, and physical activity itself.
In agreement with previous reports (53, 54). Pro-BNP increased significantly over both races. There was a negative correlation between copeptin and Pro-BNP levels in VGIfin, as has been also previously described. In fact, Hew-Butler et al. proposed that Pro-BNP participates as a counter-regulator of AVP secretion when the latter is stimulated by hypovolemia (55). Tachycardia-induced acute myocardial stress could also elevate Pro-BNP levels (56, 57). Harris et al. (58) have suggested that pro-BNP could be involved in the development of endurance-sport hyponatremia. However, in the current study, changes in pro-BNP were not correlated with changes in BNa+, nor post-race BNa+ levels.
Our study has several important limitations. First of all, few finishers were women.
Secondly, we did not compare the study group to the athletes in the same races who finished their race, yet did not participate in the study. Instead, we have seen a low rate of hyponatremia as compared to the findings reported in previous studies.
Thirdly, athletes that did not complete their race were not evaluated, and therefore we cannot rule out dysnatremia in non-finishers. However, the fact that not a single athlete, regardless of whether they finished the race or not, was attended by the medical team for anything other than musculoskeletal complaints seems to rule out at least moderate or severe dysnatremia. Furthermore, only finishers have been studied in previous reports, thus permitting us to compare our results with those presented in earlier publications.
Fourthly, fluid intake was self-reported, via questionnaire, and could be imprecise.
In conclusion, our study validates the 3IE-AHCD recommendations for FI based on thirst during ultra-endurance events. The incidence of hyponatremia, a potentially fatal condition, was low as compared with the findings of previous studies, and hyponatremia mild, without induction of clinically significant hypernatremia, nor an apparent negative repercussion on athletes, as based on race times. Coaches/trainers, athletes and event personnel/organizers should be made aware that athletes should only drink the quantity of liquid that their thirst demands. Educational sessions on hyponatremia should be held, assuring recognition of athletes needing urgent attention.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics and Clinical Research Committee of the HCSC (internal code 17/018-E). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
DL, IR, and JV: conceptualization. DL, MC, and GS: methodology. DL, JR-S, MC, GS, MR, AC-P, IR, and JV: validation, writing—review and editing, supervision, and reviewing. DL, MC, and JR-S: formal analysis. DL, MC, JR-S, and IR: investigation. DL, JR-S, IR, and JV: writing—original draft preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2021.781229/full#supplementary-material
References
1.
AlmondCSDShinAYFortescueEBMannixRCWypijDBinstadtBAet al. Hyponatremia among runners in the Boston Marathon. N Engl J Med. (2005) 352:1550–6. 10.1056/NEJMoa043901
2.
NoakesTDSharwoodKSpeedyDHewTReidSDugasJet al. Three independent biological mechanisms cause exercise-associated hyponatremia: evidence from 2,135 weighed competitive athletic performances. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2005) 102:18550–5. 10.1073/pnas.0509096102
3.
SpeedyDBNoakesTDSchneiderC. Exercise-associated hyponatremia: a review. Emerg Med. (2001) 13:17–27. 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2001.00173.x
4.
SallisRE. Fluid balance and dysnatremias in athletes. Curr Sport Med Rep. (2008) 7:s14. 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31817f381b
5.
Hew-ButlerTRosnerMHFowkes-GodekSDugasJPHoffmanMDLewisDPet al. Statement of the 3rd international exercise-associated hyponatremia consensus development conference, Carlsbad, California, 2015. Br J Sports Med. (2015) 49:1432–46. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095004
6.
RosnerMHKirvenJ. Exercise-associated hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2007) 2:151–61. 10.2215/CJN.02730806
7.
Hew-ButlerTLoiVPaniARosnerMH. Exercise-associated hyponatremia: 2017 update. Front Med. (2017) 4:21. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00021
8.
ConvertinoVAArmstrongLECoyleEFMackGWSawkaMNSenayLCet al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1996) 28:i–vii. 10.1097/00005768-199610000-00045
9.
WyndhamCHStrydomNB. The danger of an inadequate water intake during marathon running. S Afr Med J. (1969) 43:893–6.
10.
MurrayB. Fluid replacement: The American College of Sport Medicine Position Stand. Sport Sci. (1996) 9:1–5.
11.
NoakesTDNormanRJBuckRHGodlontonJStevensonKPittawayD. The incidence of hyponatremia during prolonged ultraendurance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1990) 22:165–70. 10.1249/00005768-199004000-00148
12.
HewTDChorleyJNCiancaJCDivineJG. The incidence, risk factors, and clinical manifestations of hyponatremia in marathon runners. Clin J Sport Med. (2003) 13:41–7. 10.1097/00042752-200301000-00008
13.
AyusJCVaronJArieffAI. Hyponatremia, cerebral edema, and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema in marathon runners. Ann Intern Med. (2000) 132:711–4. 10.7326/0003-4819-132-9-200005020-00005
14.
DavisDPVideenJSMarinoAVilkeGMDunford JVVan CampSPet al. Exercise-associated hyponatremia in marathon runners: a two-year experience. J Emerg Med. (2001) 21:47–57. 10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00320-1
15.
BeltramiFGHew-ButlerTNoakesTD. Drinking policies and exercise-associated hyponatraemia: is anyone still promoting overdrinking?Br J Sports Med. (2008) 42:796–501. 10.1136/bjsm.2008.047944
16.
GariganTPRistedtDE. Death from hyponatremia as a result of acute water intoxication in an Army basic trainee. Mil Med. (1999) 164:234–8. 10.1093/milmed/164.3.234
17.
SpeedyDBNoakesTDRogersIRThompsonJMDCampbellRGDKuttnerJAet al. Hyponatremia in ultradistance triathletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1999) 31:8. 10.1097/00005768-199906000-00008
18.
LebusDKCasazzaGAHoffmanMDVan LoanMD. Can changes in body mass and total body water accurately predict hyponatremia after a 161-km running race?Clin J Sport Med. (2010) 20:193–9. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181da53ea
19.
GardnerJW. Death by water intoxication. Mil Med. (2002) 167:432–4. 10.1093/milmed/167.5.432
20.
ReynoldsNCSchumakerHDFeigheryS. Complications of fluid overload in heat casualty prevention during field training. Mil Med. (1998) 163:789–91. 10.1093/milmed/163.11.789
21.
HoffmanMDBrossTLHamiltonRT. Are we being drowned by overhydration advice on the Internet?Phys Sportsmed. (2016) 44:343–8. 10.1080/00913847.2016.1222853
22.
SharwoodKCollinsMGoedeckeJWilsonGNoakesT. Weight changes, sodium levels, and performance in the South African Ironman Triathlon. Clin J Sport Med. (2002) 12:391–9. 10.1097/00042752-200211000-00012
23.
SiegelAJVerbalisJGClementSMendelsonJHMelloNKAdnerMet al. Hyponatremia in marathon runners due to inappropriate arginine vasopressin secretion. Am J Med. (2007) 120:461.e11–7. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.10.027
24.
ReidSASpeedyDBThompsonJMDNoakesTDMulliganGPageTet al. Study of hematological and biochemical parameters in runners completing a standard marathon. Clin J Sport Med. (2004) 14:344–53. 10.1097/00042752-200411000-00004
25.
WharamPCSpeedyDBNoakesTDThompsonJMDReidSAHoltzhausenL-Met al. NSAID use increases the risk of developing hyponatremia during an Ironman triathlon. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2006) 38:618–22. 10.1249/01.mss.0000210209.40694.09
26.
KnechtleBKnechtlePRosemannT. Low prevalence of exercise-associated hyponatremia in male 100 km ultra-marathon runners in Switzerland. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2011) 111:1007–16. 10.1007/s00421-010-1729-7
27.
Hew-ButlerTVerbalisJGNoakesTD. International Marathon Medical Directors Association. Updated fluid recommendation: position statement from the International Marathon Medical Directors Association (IMMDA). Clin J Sport Med. (2006) 16:283–92. 10.1097/00042752-200607000-00001
28.
GalunETur-KaspaIAssiaEBursteinRStraussNEpsteinYet al. Hyponatremia induced by exercise: a 24-hour endurance march study. Miner Electrolyte Metab. (1991) 17:315–20.
29.
HerfelRStoneCKKourySIBlakeJJ. Iatrogenic acute hyponatraemia in a college athlete. Br J Sports Med. (1998) 32:257–8. 10.1136/bjsm.32.3.257
30.
NoakesT. IMMDA fluid replacement during marathon running. Clin J Sport Med. (2003) 13:309–18. 10.1097/00042752-200309000-00007
31.
KrabakBJLipmanGSWaiteBLRundellSD. Exercise-associated hyponatremia, hypernatremia, and hydration status in multistage ultramarathons. Wilderness Environ Med. (2017) 28:291–8. 10.1016/j.wem.2017.05.008
32.
Hew-ButlerTSharwoodKBoulterJCollinsMTuckerRDugasJet al. Dysnatremia predicts a delayed recovery in collapsed ultramarathon runners. Clin J Sport Med. (2007) 17:289–96. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31804c779b
33.
HofmannHPortaSEdlingerBWeissPADobnigHSlawitschPet al. Interindividual comparability of blood glucose alterations after meals of complex carbohydrates. Exp Pathol. (1990) 40:179–84. 10.1016/S0232-1513(11)80342-7
34.
Au-YeungKLWuWCYauWHHoHF. A study of serum sodium level among Hong Kong runners. Clin J Sport Med. (2010) 20:482–7. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181f469f0
35.
NoseHMackGWShiXRNadelER. Role of osmolality and plasma volume during rehydration in humans. J Appl Physiol. (1988) 65:325–31. 10.1152/jappl.1988.65.1.325
36.
GreenleafJE. Problem: thirst, drinking behavior, and involuntary dehydration. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1992) 24:645–56. 10.1249/00005768-199206000-00007
37.
GlaceBWMurphyCAMcHughMP. Food intake and electrolyte status of ultramarathoners competing in extreme heat. J Am Coll Nutr. (2002) 21:553–9. 10.1080/07315724.2002.10719254
38.
GerthJOttUFünfstückRBartschRKeilESchubertKet al. The effects of prolonged physical exercise on renal function, electrolyte balance and muscle cell breakdown. Clin Nephrol. (2002) 57:425–31. 10.5414/CNP57425
39.
TwerenboldRKnechtleBKakebeekeTHEserPMüllerGvon ArxPet al. Effects of different sodium concentrations in replacement fluids during prolonged exercise in women. Br J Sports Med. (2003) 37:300–3. 10.1136/bjsm.37.4.300
40.
Hew-ButlerTDSharwoodKCollinsMSpeedyDNoakesT. Sodium supplementation is not required to maintain serum sodium concentrations during an Ironman triathlon. Br J Sports Med. (2006) 40:255–9. 10.1136/bjsm.2005.022418
41.
StuempfleKJLehmannDRCaseHSHughesSLEvansD. Change in serum sodium concentration during a cold weather ultradistance race. Clin J Sport Med. (2003) 13:171–5. 10.1097/00042752-200305000-00008
42.
NelsonPBEllisDFuFBloomMDO'MalleyJ. Fluid and electrolyte balance during a cool weather marathon. Am J Sports Med. (1989) 17:770–2. 10.1177/036354658901700608
43.
RefsumHETveitBMeenHDStrömmeSB. Serum electrolyte, fluid and acid-base balance after prolonged heavy exercise at low environmental temperature. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. (1973) 32:117–22. 10.3109/00365517309084338
44.
CohenIZimmermanAL. Changes in serum electrolyte levels during marathon running. S Afr Med J. (1978) 53:449–53.
45.
MaronMBHorvathSMWilkersonJE. Acute blood biochemical alterations in response to marathon running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. (1975) 34:173–81. 10.1007/BF00999930
46.
BarrSICostillDLFinkWJ. Fluid replacement during prolonged exercise: effects of water, saline, or no fluid. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1991) 23:811–7. 10.1249/00005768-199107000-00007
47.
McConellGKBurgeCMSkinnerSLHargreavesM. Influence of ingested fluid volume on physiological responses during prolonged exercise. Acta Physiol Scand. (1997) 160:149–56. 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1997.00139.x
48.
VrijensDMRehrerNJ. Sodium-free fluid ingestion decreases plasma sodium during exercise in the heat. J Appl Physiol. (1999) 86:1847–51. 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.6.1847
49.
MareshCMBergeronMFKenefickRWCastellaniJWHoffmanJRArmstrongLE. Effect of overhydration on time-trial swim performance. J strength Cond Res. (2001) 15:514–8. 10.1519/00124278-200111000-00019
50.
MorgenthalerNGStruckJAlonsoCBergmannA. Assay for the measurement of copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the precursor of vasopressin. Clin Chem. (2006) 52:112–9. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.060038
51.
MorgenthalerNGStruckJJochbergerSDünserMW. Copeptin: clinical use of a new biomarker. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2008) 19:43–9. 10.1016/j.tem.2007.11.001
52.
JochbergerSMorgenthalerNGMayrVDLucknerGWenzelVUlmerHet al. Copeptin and arginine vasopressin concentrations in critically ill patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2006) 91:4381–6. 10.1210/jc.2005-2830
53.
ScharhagJGeorgeKShaveRUrhausenAKindermannW. Exercise-associated increases in cardiac biomarkers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2008) 40:1408–15. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318172cf22
54.
BordbarSBigiMABAslaniARahimiEAhmadiN. Effect of endurance and strength exercise on release of brain natriuretic peptide. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. (2012) 3:22–5. 10.4103/0975-3583.91599
55.
Hew-ButlerTHoffmanMDStuempfleKJRogersIRMorgenthalerNGVerbalisJG. Changes in copeptin and bioactive vasopressin in runners with and without hyponatremia. Clin J Sport Med. (2011) 21:211–7. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31821a62c2
56.
OcakTErdemADuranATekeliogluÜYÖztürkSAyhanSSet al. The diagnostic significance of NT-proBNP and troponin I in emergency department patients presenting with palpitations. Clinics (São Paulo). (2013) 68:543–7. 10.6061/clinics/2013(04)17
57.
ReevesSWomackCLuthererLOToddCPinkneyKKasemsriT. What is high enough? Elevated NT-pro-BNP in decompensated paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. J Pediatr Intensive Care. (2018) 7:49–53. 10.1055/s-0037-1603760
58.
HarrisGReidSSikarisKMcCroryP. Hyponatremia is associated with higher NT-proBNP than normonatremia after prolonged exercise. Clin J Sport Med. (2012) 22:488–94. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182580ce8
Summary
Keywords
exercise, sodium disorders, hyponatremia, hypernatremia, copeptin
Citation
López de Lara D, Ruiz-Sánchez JG, Cuesta M, Seara G, Calle-Pascual AL, Rubio Herrera MÁ, Runkle I and Verbalis JG (2022) Exercise-Induced Hyponatremia: An Assessment of the International Hydration Recommendations Followed During the Gran Trail De Peñalara and Vitoria-Gasteiz Ironman Competitions. Front. Nutr. 8:781229. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.781229
Received
22 September 2021
Accepted
06 December 2021
Published
21 February 2022
Volume
8 - 2021
Edited by
Yuri Hosokawa, Waseda University, Japan
Reviewed by
Sophie C. Killer, English Institute of Sport, United Kingdom; Fabiana B. Benatti, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 López de Lara, Ruiz-Sánchez, Cuesta, Seara, Calle-Pascual, Rubio Herrera, Runkle and Verbalis.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Diego López de Lara dldlara1976@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Sport and Exercise Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.