CORRECTION article

Front. Nutr., 13 May 2022

Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets

Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.850033

Corrigendum: A Review of the Use of Linear Programming to Optimize Diets, Nutritiously, Economically and Environmentally

  • 1. Program for the Development of Sustainable Production Systems (PDSPS), Faculty of Engineering, University of Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile

  • 2. Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile

  • 3. Voedingscentrum, The Netherlands Nutrition Centre, Den Haag, Netherlands

Article metrics

View details

4

Citations

2,8k

Views

812

Downloads

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table A1 as published. Reference [41] was duplicated twice in the table. Additionally, there were errors in the classification of the articles presented in Table A1. In the Acceptability column the original paper did not consider “portion size” as a constraint to diet optimization. In the revised Table A1 this has been added in the column Comments. The corrected Table A1 appears below. Full reference details for the references cited in the table can be found in the original article.

TABLE A1

ReferenceYearLP or QPConstraintsComments
NutrientsCostsEnvironmentAcceptability
502000LPNAA corresponds to portion size
112001LPNAA corresponds to portion size
292001LPNAA corresponds to portion size
422001LPN
342002LPNAA corresponds to portion size
512002QPNCAA corresponds to portion size
32003Review
522003LPNCAA corresponds to portion size
652003QPNAA corresponds to portion size
442004LPNAA corresponds to portion size
542004LPNC
312006QPNAA corresponds to portion size
452006LPNCAA corresponds to portion size
532006LPNC
552007LPIt does not perform optimization
592007LPNCAA corresponds to portion size and the amount to be consumed
322008QPN
462008LPNC
562008LPNAThe author explicitly states that it includes nutrient (N) and acceptability restrictions (A)
582008LPN
302009LPNC
352009LPNCAA corresponds to the deviation from current consumption. And at least one of the 4 models developed includes cost constraints (C)
382009LPN
402009LPNAA corresponds to portion size
432009LPNA
42009LPNA
472010LPN
162010LPNE
332010LPNC
392011LPNCThe author explicitly states that it includes cost restrictions (C)
572011LPNAA corresponds to the deviation from current consumption
692011LPNIt does not include acceptability in the restrictions
172012LPN
362012LPNAA corresponds to portion size
492012LPNC
412013LPN
192013LPNCE
182013LPIt was not possible to access
92014LPNAA corresponds to the deviation from current consumption
482014LPNIt does not include cost restrictions; it mentions that it can be included in the developed tool
132014QPNAA corresponds to the deviation from current consumption
202015LPNCEAA corresponds to the deviation from current consumption
222015LPNE
152016Review
262016LPNEAA corresponds to the deviation from current consumption
122016LPNEAA corresponds to the deviation from current consumption
232016LPNE
252016LPNEAA corresponds to the deviation from current consumption
242016LPNE
682016LPNACosts included in the objective function, not in the restrictions
212016LPNEA

Short overview of the reviewed papers, year published, type of programming (linear or quadratic) and constraints used.

In the original article there was also an error in reference [47]. The reference for [47] was incorrectly written as “Maillot M, Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Are he lowest-cost healthful food plans culturally and socially acceptable? Public Health Nutr. (2010) 13:1178–85. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009993028”. It should be “Maillot M, Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Are the lowest-cost healthful food plans culturally and socially acceptable? Public Health Nutr. (2010) 13:1178–85. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009993028”.

In the original article, there also was an error in the section Results, Twelve Studies With Ecological Constraints, Paragraph 1. In the list “France, UK, and New Zealand”, France should not have been included and the reference [60] should not have been included. The updated paragraph appears below.

Several studies—for instance in UK, and New Zealand—have successfully applied LP to optimize diets (4, 19, 33, 38, 39, 44, 46, 47, 57). This section gives an overview of the 12 studies which have applied ecological constraints to 14 diets between 2000 and 2016 (13, 16–26). The studies are summarized in Table 1.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Author contributions

AE, JG-L, and ÓV contributed to the conception and the design of this corrigendum and performed the analytic review. JG-L organized the database and first references' analysis of this corrigendum and wrote the first corrigendum draft of the manuscript. ÓV, AE, and CD wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Summary

Keywords

sustainable diet, linear programming, diet costs, nutritional quality, environmental constraints (EC)

Citation

García-Leal J, Espinoza Pérez AT, van Dooren C and Vásquez ÓC (2022) Corrigendum: A Review of the Use of Linear Programming to Optimize Diets, Nutritiously, Economically and Environmentally. Front. Nutr. 9:850033. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.850033

Received

07 January 2022

Accepted

24 January 2022

Published

13 May 2022

Volume

9 - 2022

Edited by

Uma Tiwari, Technological University Dublin, Ireland

Reviewed by

William A. Masters, Tufts University, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Óscar C. Vásquez

This article was submitted to Nutrition and Sustainable Diets, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics