Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 16 January 2024
Sec. Nutrition and Food Science Technology
Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1319888

Identification of RNAi hypoallergic bread wheat lines for wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis patients

María H. Guzmán-López1 Violeta Ruipérez2 Miriam Marín-Sanz1 Isabel Ojeda-Fernández3 Pedro Ojeda-Fernández3 José Antonio Garrote-Adrados4 Eduardo Arranz-Sanz4 Francisco Barro1*
  • 1Functional Genomics Laboratory, Plant Breeding Department, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, Spanish National Research Council (IAS-CSIC), Córdoba, Spain
  • 2College of Agricultural Engineering, University of Valladolid, Palencia, Spain
  • 3Clínica Ojeda, Clínica de Asma y Alergia Doctores Ojeda, Madrid, Spain
  • 4Excellence Unit, Institute of Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Valladolid—Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Valladolid, Spain

Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA) is one of the most severe forms of wheat allergy. It occurs in patients when they exercise after ingesting wheat-containing foods. Nowadays, the only possible alternative for WDEIA patients is to avoid such foods. This study investigated the potential of six RNA of interference (RNAi) wheat lines with low-prolamin content as alternatives for WDEIA patients. For that purpose, a high performance-liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was performed to evaluate differences in gluten protein fractions among these lines. Next, western blots were conducted to measure the immunoglobulin E (IgE) reactivity to wheat proteins in sera from five WDEIA patients. Additionally, monoclonal antibodies (moAb) recognition sites and the IgE binding sites were searched in all peptides identified by LC-MS/MS after protein digestion. The results showed a 61.4%–81.2% reduction in the gliadin content of the RNAi lines, accompanied by an increase in their high-molecular weight (HMW) glutenin content compared to the wild type bread wheat line (WT). In all cases, the reduction in gliadin content correlated with a decrease in IgE reactivity observed in the sera of WDEIA patients, highlighting the E82 and H320 lines. These two RNAi lines exhibited a ≤90% reduction in IgE reactivity. This reduction could be attributed to an absence of IgE binding sites associated with α- and ω5-gliadins, which were present in the WT. Overall, these lines offer a potential alternative for foodstuff for individuals with WDEIA.

1 Introduction

Wheat is one of the most widely grown cereals in the world, mainly due to the distinct viscoelastic properties of its dough. Wheat flour contains a complex mixture of gluten proteins, directly related to bread-making quality, and non-gluten proteins (NGPs), metabolic and structural functions playing a secondary role in wheat quality (1). Meanwhile, gluten proteins comprise about 80% of the total flour protein and include two different protein groups: gliadins and glutenins. The monomeric gliadins can be further classified into α-/β-, γ-, and ω-gliadins according to their mobility in acid-PAGE (A-PAGE). Additionally, ω-gliadins can be divided into ω1,2-gliadins and ω5-gliadins based on their N-terminus sequences; beginning with ARE/KELQS and SRLL, respectively (2). The polymeric glutenins consist of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GSs) linked by disulfide bonds to low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GSs) (3).

Gluten proteins are also responsible for a wide range of immune responses related to human pathologies such as celiac disease (CD), a chronic enteropathy linked to the human leukocyte antigens (HLA) HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 in susceptible individuals accounting for a 1% of the worldwide population (4, 5). Another pathology associated with gluten is non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS), characterized by intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms after consuming wheat-based products (6, 7). In contrast to CD, NCWS does not elicit an autoimmune response. Other pathologies related to gluten include allergies such as baker’s asthma and wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA). Both wheat allergies are triggered by a range of wheat proteins that stimulate immunoglobulin E (IgE) production, which leads to the activation of mast cells and basophils by cross-linking.

WDEIA is one of the most severe forms of wheat allergy and occurs in patients when they engage in physical exercise after the ingestion of wheat-containing foods (8). Other co-hypothesized factors are drugs, alcohol, or stress that may influence the allergic response by increasing gastrointestinal permeability or tissue transglutaminase activation (2, 9). This pathology may present a range of clinical symptoms, including urticaria, angioedema, generalized erythema, and wheezing, and can progress to life-threatening anaphylactic shock (10, 11). Because of its symptoms, WDEIA frequently goes undiagnosed and is mistaken for other pathologies such as chronic urticaria, exercise-induced or idiopathic anaphylaxis (12). The prevalence of this pathology has been reported to be between 0.10%–0.80% in adults regardless of ethnicity and region (1319).

Diverse IgE-binding sites (epitopes) have been associated with WDEIA (2, 2025). The major allergens responsible for this pathology are the ω5-gliadins. In fact, some authors prefer to use the term “ω5-gliadin allergy” instead of WDEIA (26, 27). The primary epitope for the ω5-gliadins has been identified as QQX1PX2QQ, where X1 can be L, F, S, or I, and X2 can be Q, E, or G, as determined through cDNA cloning (21, 24, 28, 29). A study by Matsuo et al. (21) found that 80% of WDEIA patients strongly reacted to the ω5-gliadins, while the remaining patients reacted to the HMW glutenins. Thus, HMW glutenins are also considered major allergens, being QQPGQ, QQPGQGQQ, and QQSGQGQ major epitopes for WDEIA (21, 24). Other minor epitopes have been described in α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins, ω1,2-gliadins, and LMW-GSs (26, 29, 30).

Various alternatives have been developed to address the issue of major allergens present in wheat-based foods (2). One of these approaches involves altering allergen epitopes by enzymatic degradation, deamidation, or the addition of reducing agents. Another approach involves the use of wheat lines with reduced allergenicity. These lines can either be obtained through classic plant breeding methods or through genetic engineering techniques like RNAi. Diverse hypoallergenic wheat lines lacking ω5-gliadins have shown promising results in reducing reactivity to serum IgE in wheat-allergic patients while maintaining flour characteristics. However, none of these lines are still safe for WDEIA patients to consume.

Consequently, a lifelong gluten-free diet is the only possible treatment for wheat-related pathologies. However, both gluten and wheat are used extensively in the food industry, which makes avoiding these products considerably challenging. This leads to transgressions in the diet which can be up to 60% (31). Therefore, reducing or eliminating specific gluten proteins constitutes a desirable aim for selecting less immunogenic varieties while preserving wheat organoleptic qualities.

RNAi technology has been successfully used for the down-regulation and knock-out of gliadin genes in bread and durum wheat, resulting in wheat lines with low gluten content and low stimulatory capacity of triggering CD and NCWS (3234). The present study aimed to evaluate the IgE-mediated reactivity of protein extracts from the flour of six RNAi wheat lines with low-prolamin by using WDEIA patients’ sera. To that, we quantified the gliadin and glutenin content to select the RNAi lines and carried out total protein digestions. Later, we compared the reactivity mediated by IgE of control and WDEIA patients’ sera to RNAi wheat flours. Finally, we carried out a proteomic analysis of these lines to further characterize peptide composition and IgE recognition sites.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Plant material

Six RNAi lines and one control line were used in this study. The control line, denoted as BW208, is a bread wheat line from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), and the six RNAi lines (E33, E82, E83, D793, D894, and H320) were obtained from this line and are further described in Table 1 (3236). Briefly, E33, E82, and E83 lines were transformed with two plasmids for the silencing of the ɣ-gliadins and the α- and ω-gliadins; both hairpin RNA (hpRNA) silencing fragments under the control of a D-hordein promoter (33). D793 and D894 lines were transformed with one plasmid for silencing the α- and ω-gliadins under the control of a ɣ-gliadin promoter (35). H320 line was transformed with two plasmids, one targeting the α-gliadins and the other targeting the ω-gliadins, both under the control of a D-hordein promoter (36).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Description of bread wheat lines used in this study, including plasmids and RNAi fragments used.

2.2 Patient sera

Human sera were obtained from eight adults: three healthy adults (1 female, 2 males, mean age: 44, mean IgE against ω5-gliadin: < 0.35 kU/L) and five patients with a confirmed clinical history of anaphylaxis episodes and WDEIA positive diagnosis (1 female, 4 males, mean age: 48, mean IgE against ω5-gliadin: 25.51 kU/L; Supplementary Table S1). The diagnosis was confirmed through (i) cereal flour prick-tests and (ii) hybridizing sera with bread wheat grain proteins and later determination of reactivity mediated by IgE. Interviews were conducted to ascertain that no healthy participant had experienced an allergic episode after consuming wheat products. Sera were collected from the participating individuals and stored at −80°C until needed. All experiments involving human sera were carried out in accordance with the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1965 (as revised in Brazil 2013). This study uses samples obtained from a by-product of routine care or industry. Therefore, the study did not require to be reviewed or approved by an ethics committee. Patients also provided informed consent for their use in scientific research.

2.3 Gliadins and glutenins quantification by reverse-phase (RP)-HPLC

The gliadin and glutenin fractions were extracted from wheat flour and quantified by RP-HPLC as reported in Marín-Sanz et al. (37). Briefly, 100 mg of flour were homogenized with 3 × 670 μL of 60% (v/v) ethanol and, incubated at RT for 10 min while continuously shaking. The samples were then centrifuged, and the supernatants containing the gliadin fraction were collected. The remaining pellet served as the raw material for extracting glutenins. As a result, each sample received 3 × 670 μL of C1 buffer, which contained 50% (v/v) 1-propanol, 2 M urea, 0.05 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 2% (w/v) dithiothreitol (DTT). Samples were vortexed and then incubated at 60°C for 30 min. Following centrifugation, the supernatants containing the glutenin fraction were collected. The three collected supernatants were mixed and filtered in both cases through a 0.45 μm nylon filter.

The gliadins and glutenins were quantified from each sample using a 1200 Series Quaternary LC System liquid chromatography from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, United States) coupled to a DAD UV-V detector. Ten microliters of protein extracts were injected into a LiChrospher® 100 RP8 column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The integration procedure was performed automatically by Agilent Technologies ChemStation software with minor adjustments. Three replicate analyses were carried out on separate extracts for each RNAi line and control.

2.4 Total proteins and non-gluten proteins determination

The total protein content of whole flour was determined using the Kjeldahl nitrogen content (%N × 5.7) according to the standard ICC method No. 105/2 (38). The NGPs, expressed in percentage of dried weight (% DW), were calculated for each line as follows: Total protein in % − (Prolamin content in μg/mg × 10)/(100 − Moisture in %), where prolamin content is the sum of the gliadins and glutenins.

2.5 Wheat protein extracts and IgE immunoblotting analyses

For immunoblotting, wheat grain proteins were extracted as described in Gil-Humanes et al. (39). Briefly, 25 μL of a protein extraction buffer [62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1.5% (w/v) DTT, 10% (v/v) glycerol and 0.002% bromophenol blue] per mg of flour was added to each sample. After a 30 min incubation period at 70°C, the samples were centrifuged at 14,000 g for 2 min, and the supernatant was collected.

The reactivity mediated by IgE of bread wheat proteins was determined through western blotting. Total protein extracts were separated through 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a 0.45 μm polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, United States). Once transferred, the membrane was incubated for 1 h in a TBS blocking solution (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) with 5% goat serum. 1:10 dilutions of human sera samples were incubated for 20 h at 4°C. After washing three times, the membrane was incubated for 1 h with a 1:5,000 dilution of a human anti-IgE secondary antibody conjugated to peroxidase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, United States). Additionally, the gliadin fraction of RNAi and WT lines were extracted following the method described in Gil-Humanes et al. (40). Afterward, proteins were separated through 10% SDS-PAGE and later subjected to a western blot using the same protocol as above. In this latter case, an anti-gliadin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, United States) was used. Regardless of the antibody and extract used, proteins were detected by a Pierce ECL system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, United States) and quantified by band gel densitometry using Quantity One (Bio-Rad). Experiments were carried out in triplicate.

2.6 Protein digestion and proteomic data analysis

Flour from control and RNAi wheat lines was subjected to protein extraction, digestion, and proteomic analysis as described by Haro et al. (41). Firstly, UPEX solution and 60% ethanol were used to extract gluten protein. After extraction, each sample’s total protein content was precipitated using the methanol/chloroform method. Forty micrograms of protein pellets were resuspended, denatured, and reduced for digestion. Digestions of each sample were performed by adding chymotrypsin endoproteinase MS Grade (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, United States) or sequence grade-modified trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, United States) in a 1/20 ratio (w/w). The samples were then incubated at 37°C overnight on a shaker and then dried out by evaporation.

Digested peptides were then subjected to 1D-nano LC ESI-MS/MS analysis using a nano liquid chromatography system coupled to a high-speed Triple TOF 5600 mass spectrometer with a Nanospray III Source as previously described in Vaquero et al. (7). Raw data files were converted to Mascot generic files (.mgf), then searched against Triticum spp. NCBI database using the Mascot Server v. 2.5.0 (Matrix Science, London, United Kingdom). The search parameters and additional details were described in Vaquero et al. (7). Finally, custom Python scripts were used to search for monoclonal antibody recognition sites and IgE binding sites in unique peptides with perfect match or one mismatch.1 The IgE-binding epitope sequences were obtained from Matsuo et al. (30) for the gluten proteins, non-specific lipid transfer protein 1, serpins, and α-purothionins. These scripts were also used to sort these unique peptides into the different types of gluten proteins: ω-, α- and γ-gliadins, HMW-, and LMW-GSs. The sequences searched in the unique peptide database are described in Supplementary Table S2 (28, 4245).

3 Results

3.1 Protein profiles of RNAi lines

First, RP-HPLC analysis was performed to characterize the differences between the RNAi and control lines for the gluten protein fractions, gliadins and glutenins (Figure 1). RNAi lines harbor different hpRNA fragments with gliadins as their common target. Furthermore, the hpRNAs are driven by different endosperm-specific promoters. Hence, differences in the content of the gluten protein fractions are likely to result from the efficiency of the promoters and their match in silencing their respective targets. As shown, gliadins were significantly reduced by 61.4%–81.2% in the RNAi lines compared to the WT (Figure 1A). Additionally, the total gliadin content was quantified by SDS-PAGE and band gel densitometry in all lines (Figure 1C). These data also showed a 44.9%–96.2% reduction of gliadins in all RNAi lines. Regardless of the type of protein quantification, the E82 and E83 lines presented the lowest gliadin content. Interestingly, according to the RP-HPLC data, the total glutenin levels increased by 85.7% in the D894 line, while the E82, E83, and H320 lines presented a 33.5%–43.0% reduction compared to the WT. No significant differences were found in the glutenin content between the D793, E33, and WT lines. Figure 1B shows that all three gliadin fractions were decreased in the RNAi lines: with the γ-gliadins exhibiting the largest silencing of all gliadin fractions, particularly in the E82 and E83 lines. In contrast, the HMW-GSs were increased in all RNAi lines, while the LMW-GSs decreased. The only exception was the D894 RNAi line, which presented an increase in both glutenin fractions compared to the BW208 WT line. Overall, the strong decrease in gliadins leads to an increase in the HMW-GSs and is also compensated by the NGPs; the greater the decrease, the greater the compensation, so that the total protein content remains around 13% in all RNAi lines (Supplementary Figure S1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Total content of gliadins and glutenins in each line quantified by RP-HPLC analysis. (B) The log2(FC) of each of the gliadin and glutenin fractions was quantified by RP-HPLC analysis for each line compared to the WT (BW208). Mann–Whitney tests were performed for comparison each line and the WT. *p < 0.05. (C) Percentage of gliadin band intensity in SDS-PAGE of RNAi lines compared to the WT. WT, wild type bread wheat line.

3.2 IgE reactivity to total protein extracts

Next, western blots were carried out to quantify the reactivity mediated by IgE of protein extracts from the WT and the RNAi lines. Initially, the serum from each WDEIA patient and healthy adult was incubated individually with total protein extracts from each low-gliadin RNAi and control lines (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure S2). When the serum of each WDEIA patient was used individually for the assay, E82, E83, and H320 lines presented the highest reduction in reactivity across all patients when compared to the WT. Additionally, a sera mix composed of proportional parts of each patient’s serum was also incubated with total protein extracts from each WT and RNAi line. The results obtained are represented in Figure 3. These results indicate that all RNAi lines presented a significant decrease in the reactivity mediated by IgE when compared to the WT (Figures 3B,C). These data concord with the total content of gliadins in the flours, as these lines present a high silencing in the expression and accumulation of gliadins. Thus, the reduction in gliadin content implies a decrease in allergenicity in wheat, highlighting E82 and H320 lines, which showed a marked reduction in reactivity (≤90% compared to the WT) in patients with WDEIA. No reactivity was observed in serum from healthy individuals incubated with the protein extracts (Figure 3A).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. IgE specific immunodetection in total protein extracts of WT and RNAi bread wheat lines in each WDEIA patient (S1-5). WT, wild type bread wheat line.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Reactivity mediated by IgE against WT and RNAi bread wheat flours in a sera mix of (A) control patients and (B) WDEIA patients. (C) The reactivity is presented as a percentage of reactivity when compared to the WT (100% reactivity). Data correspond to the average ± SD of three different experiments. Completely randomized p-values were obtained by ANOVA. Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different by the LSD test at the 5% of significance. p < 0.001. WT, wild type bread wheat line.

3.3 Proteomic data analysis from RNAi and control bread wheat flours

As H320 and E82 lines exhibited the lowest IgE reactivity of WDEIA patients’ sera, a proteomic analysis of their flour was carried out to characterize them further. Protein extraction of flour from bread wheat RNAi and WT lines was performed and digested with chymotrypsin or trypsin. Then, peptides were identified by LC-MS/MS analysis, in which custom Phyton scripts searched for monoclonal antibodies (moAb) recognition sites and the IgE binding sites in all peptides identified by LC-MS/MS after protein digestion. On the one hand, the IgE binding sites have been previously linked to various illnesses, including WDEIA, baker’s asthma, and wheat allergy (28, 30). On the other hand, R5, G12, and A1 are the most popular moAbs utilized to determine the presence of gluten peptides. The ELISA R5 method is recommended by the Working Group on Prolamin Analysis and Toxicity (WGPAT) for determining gluten and is described as a Type I analysis method by the Codex Alimentarius (CODEX STAN 118-1979). The G12 and A1 moAbs were designed to recognize the most immunogenic gluten peptide of α-gliadins, the 33-mer (45, 46). The results obtained are displayed in Figure 4. When compared to the WT, both RNAi lines exhibited fewer moAbs recognition sites and IgE binding sites. The E82 and H320 lines presented a 90%–97% and 38%–57% reduction of the moAbs recognition sites in comparison to that of the WT, respectively (Figure 4B). Regarding the IgE binding sites, neither the ω5-gliadin nor the α-gliadin epitopes were present in the peptides from the RNAi lines. However, the E82 and H320 did present 6.8 and 71.2% of ω1,2- and ɣ-gliadin epitopes of the WT, respectively. As for the IgE binding sites related to glutenins, both lines presented fewer LMW binding sites but more HMW than the WT (Figure 4A). The E82 and H320 exhibited 41.7% and 16.7% of the LMW binding sites present in the WT. However, the E82 and H320 lines presented more HMW binding sites than the control line, 10 and 2.2 times more HMW, respectively. Interestingly, only two IgE binding hits were found in serpins in the E82 line.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Number of hits of (A) IgE and (B) moAb recognition sites in the unique peptides of BW208 (WT), E82, and H320 lines. WT, wild type bread wheat line.

4 Discussion

In this study, we compared the allergenicity of six RNAi lines (E33, E82, E83, D793, D894, and H320) in sera from WDEIA patients (33, 35, 47). All the bread wheat lines were transformed for the silencing of gliadins under either a D-hordein or γ-gliadin promoter. The ω- and α-gliadins were targeted in all lines, and in E33, E82, and E83 lines, the ɣ-gliadins were also down-regulated.

Initially, we characterized the gliadin and glutenin content of all RNAi lines through RP-HPLC analysis. Our results showed a significant reduction in the total gliadin content of these lines compared to the control line, with the γ-gliadins exhibiting the largest silencing of all fractions. The highest level of gliadin silencing was observed in the E82 line; 81.2%. Notably, only the D894 line showed a significant increase in its total glutenin fraction compared to the control, while the E82, E83, and H320 lines showed a significant reduction in this protein fraction. This reduction in the total glutenin fraction in most lines was due to a large decrease in the LMW glutenins, while HMW glutenins increased with respect to the control. Additionally, the total protein content remained comparable for all lines. Similar compensatory effects were observed in bread wheat lines in which α-gliadin genes were edited through CRISPR/Cas9 technology (48). Furthermore, these effects have also been observed in other RNAi lines designed to target gluten proteins (49, 50). For instance, certain RNAi lines targeting the ω5 gliadin showed an increase in NGPs, glutenin subunits, and α-gliadins (50). In contrast, when ω1,2- gliadins were silenced, compensation occurred with HMW-GSs and NGPs (49). Furthermore, these protein compensations have also been reported in bread and durum wheat lines in which the α-, γ- and ω-gliadins were down-regulated by RNAi (39). In this latter study, these adjustments in the protein expression of these RNAi lines had significant consequences on the characteristics of the flour as greater amounts of HMW glutenins are generally linked with stronger flours.

Western blots were carried out with WDEIA patients’ sera to determine the IgE reactivity to total protein extracts. When the serum from each WDEIA patient was incubated separately with total protein extracts, the E82, E83, and H320 showed the lowest IgE reactivities compared to the WT. These results correlate with the changes observed in the content of total gliadin and glutenin fractions in these lines.

However, the response of each patient to every protein extract varied widely. Patient S2, for instance, exhibited the highest reactivity to the H320 protein extract among IgE present in the serum, whereas it was one of the least reactive extracts for the rest of the patients. Interestingly, the same S2 patient displayed the lowest reactivity to E82, which was also one of the least reactive lines in S1 and S4 patients. This variation of IgE reactivity in patients with WDEIA has been observed previously in other studies. Altenbach et al. (8) found variations in IgE reactivity between patients to the same protein extracts, which could be attributed to variations in IgE levels among patients or other underlying food allergies and conditions that these patients may have. In the case of LMW glutenins, this latter study noted that amounts of IgE reactivity to specific LMW glutenins were not related to protein abundances, suggesting that there are differences in the affinity of sera for specific types of LMW glutenins. Skoczowski et al. (51) also observed that the immunological response of WDEIA patients to wheat proteins is highly specific and dependent on the wheat variety and serum applied.

To mitigate inter-patient differences, we incubated a serum mix comprising equal proportions of each patient’s serum with total protein extracts from WT and RNAi lines. The IgE-mediated reactivity significantly decreased in all RNAi lines compared to the WT. Notably, E82 and H320 lines demonstrated a considerable reduction in IgE reactivity in patients with WDEIA: ≤90% relative to the WT. While the IgE binding profiles are highly specific, some immunodetected proteins are probably significant allergens as they are shared by all the patients analyzed. Based on the strength of the immunodetection by individual sera, the proteins of around 50 kDa exhibited the highest immunoreactivity. Skoczowski et al. (51) also reported the immunodetection of 49 kDa NGP in sera from WDEIA patients, as well as LMW glutenins and gliadins of similar size.

To learn about which protein fraction could be related to causing an IgE reaction in each patient, we performed a proteomic analysis of our less immunoreactive RNAi lines—E82 and H320— to characterize them further. Digested peptides of flour from RNAi and WT lines were identified by LC-MS/MS analysis. This peptide composition served as input for custom Phyton scripts that searched for monoclonal antibodies (moAb) recognition sites and IgE binding sites previously described (28, 30). Overall, both E82 and H320 lines presented the fewest moAb recognition sites and IgE binding sites when compared to the WT, which concord with the previously observed decrease in both the IgE reactivity and gliadin fraction content.

Both RNAi lines presented none of the IgE binding sites searched present in α- and ω5-gliadins. These results are consistent with the lower immunoreactivity observed in the sera of WDEIA. Given that ω5-gliadin is regarded as the most critical epitope for WDEIA, these results explain the reduced IgE reactivity in the sera of WDEIA patients (21, 22, 28). In fact, several studies have demonstrated that ω5-gliadin is a promising candidate for diagnosing immediate wheat allergy and not only WDEIA (20, 28, 29, 52). Furthermore, both lines presented a reduction in LMW-GSs epitopes as well as in ω1,2- and ɣ-gliadin binding epitopes compared to the WT. However, it is worth noting that the IgE binding sites present in these lines exhibited distinct characteristics. Notably, the H320 line displayed a higher abundance of ω1,2- and ɣ-gliadin binding sites than the E82 line. Conversely, the E82 line presented a greater amount of HMW-GSs epitopes in comparison to the H320. Despite these differences, both lines showed minimal reactivity, suggesting that none of these epitopes are likely responsible for the IgE reactivity observed in the patients’ sera.

Although both RNAi lines presented exhibited fewer IgE binding epitopes in LMW-GSs than the WT, they presented more HMW-GSs epitopes. Nevertheless, the immunoreactivity assays with patients’ sera did not show IgE reactivity with HMW glutenins. Previous research has recognized two groups of patients with WDEIA based on the IgE reactivity to wheat proteins: one group reacts to ω5-gliadin (which accounts for 80% of patients), while the other group reacts to HMW-GSs (21, 22). Additionally, sensitization to ω5-gliadin and HMW-GSs have been reported to be different depending on the age of the patient; higher sensitization rates of ω5-gliadin are found in over 20 years-old patients, while higher sensitization rates of HMW-GSs is found in younger patients (53). Consequently, the reduced IgE reactivity observed in patients’ sera could be attributed to the fact that these patients, all above 20 years old, might belong to the more common subset, namely the ω5-gliadin-reacting group.

Regarding the moAb recognition sites, both lines presented fewer R5, G12, and A1 recognition sites than the WT. Nowadays, the ELISA R5 method is the most widely used to determine gluten presence in wheat-derived products. While R5 moAb has been designed to recognize peptides of rye secalins, the G12 and A1 moAb recognize the 33-mer, the main immunogenic gluten peptide of α-gliadins for CD patients (54). Thus, the reduced presence of these moAb recognition sites supports the idea that the E82 and H320 lines also have lower immunogenic capacity. In fact, the E82 line has already been tested in a pilot study with CD patients, and it did not elicit an immune response after a short-term oral challenge (55). Hence, these findings could benefit individuals suffering from various wheat-related pathologies.

Based on our findings, we can conclude that all RNAi lines analyzed in this study exhibited reduced gliadin content, which was accompanied by an increase in their HMW-GSs content in comparison to the WT. In all cases, the reduction in gliadin content correlated with a decrease in IgE reactivity observed in the sera of WDEIA patients, although immunoblotting patterns were specific to both patients and wheat genotypes. Additionally, our observations suggest that the reduced IgE reactivity could be mainly attributed to the absence of IgE binding sites found in α- and ω5-gliadins. Overall, these lines may offer a potential alternative for consumption by individuals with WDEIA. Nonetheless, to draw a firm conclusion about the practicality of these lines, it would be necessary to perform an oral provocation test in a larger group of WDEIA patients, utilizing both wild type and our RNAi lines.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the studies involving humans because this study uses samples obtained from a by-product of routine care or industry. Therefore, the study did not require to be reviewed or approved by an ethics committee. Patients also provided informed consent for their use in scientific research. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

MG-L: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. VR: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. MM-S: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. IO-F: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. PO-F: Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. JG-A: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. EA-S: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. FB: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The project was funded by the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (PID2019-110847RB-I00, TED2021-129733B-I00 and PID2022-142139OB-I00, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033), European Union (“NextGenerationEU”/PRTR), Junta de Andalućıa (QUAL21_023 IAS) and the WheatNet (“Conexión TRIGO”) of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the generous volunteer subjects who enrolled in the study. The technical assistance of Ana García is also acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2023.1319888/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

1. Rustgi, S, Shewry, P, Brouns, F, Deleu, LJ, and Delcour, JA. Wheat seed proteins: factors influencing their content, composition, and technological properties, and strategies to reduce adverse reactions. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2019) 18:1751–69. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12493

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Morita, E, Matsuo, H, Kohno, K, Yokooji, T, Yano, H, and Endo, T. A narrative mini review on current status of hypoallergenic wheat development for IgE-mediated wheat allergy, wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Foods. (2023) 12:954. doi: 10.3390/foods12050954

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wieser, H. Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food Microbiol. (2007) 24:115–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.07.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mustalahti, K, Catassi, C, Reunanen, A, Fabiani, E, Heier, M, McMillan, S, et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: results of a centralized, international mass screening project. Ann Med. (2010) 42:587–95. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.505931

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Catassi, C, Gatti, S, and Fasano, A. The new epidemiology of celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2014) 59:S7–9. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000450393.23156.59

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Catassi, C, Bai, JC, Bonaz, B, Bouma, G, Calabrò, A, Carroccio, A, et al. Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: the new frontier of gluten related disorders. Nutrients. (2013) 5:3839–53. doi: 10.3390/nu5103839

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Vaquero, L, Comino, I, Vivas, S, Rodríguez-Martín, L, Giménez, MJ, Pastor, J, et al. Tritordeum: a novel cereal for food processing with good acceptability and significant reduction in gluten immunogenic peptides in comparison with wheat. J Sci Food Agric. (2018) 98:2201–9. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8705

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Altenbach, SB, Tanaka, CK, Pineau, F, Lupi, R, Drouet, M, Beaudouin, E, et al. Assessment of the allergenic potential of transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum) with reduced levels of ω5-gliadins, the major sensitizing allergen in wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. J Agric Food Chem. (2015) 63:9323–32. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03557

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ansley, L, Bonini, M, Delgado, L, Del Giacco, S, Du Toit, G, Khaitov, M, et al. Pathophysiological mechanisms of exercise-induced anaphylaxis: an EAACI position statement. Allergy. (2015) 70:1212–21. doi: 10.1111/all.12677

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fukunaga, K, Chinuki, Y, Hamada, Y, Fukutomi, Y, Sugiyama, A, Kishikawa, R, et al. Genome-wide association study reveals an association between the HLA-DPB1(∗)02:01:02 allele and wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Am J Hum Genet. (2021) 108:1540–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.06.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Thongngarm, T, Wongsa, C, Pacharn, P, Piboonpocanun, S, and Sompornrattanaphan, M. Clinical characteristics and proposed wheat-cofactor challenge protocol with a high diagnostic yield in adult-onset IgE-mediated wheat allergy. J Asthma Allergy. (2020) 13:355–68. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S271429

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Scherf, KA, Brockow, K, Biedermann, T, Koehler, P, and Wieser, H. Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Clin Exp Allergy. (2016) 46:10–20. doi: 10.1111/cea.12640

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Morita, E, Chinuki, Y, Takahashi, H, Nabika, T, Yamasaki, M, and Shiwaku, K. Prevalence of wheat allergy in Japanese adults. Allergol Int. (2012) 61:101–5. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.11-OA-0345

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Arámburo-Gálvez, JG, Beltrán-Cárdenas, CE, Geralda André, T, Carvalho Gomes, I, Macêdo-Callou, MA, Braga-Rocha, ÉM, et al. Prevalence of adverse reactions to gluten and people going on a gluten-free diet: a survey study conducted in Brazil. Medicina. (2020) 56:163. doi: 10.3390/medicina56040163

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nwaru, BI, Hickstein, L, Panesar, SS, Roberts, G, Muraro, A, and Sheikh, A. Prevalence of common food allergies in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. (2014) 69:992–1007. doi: 10.1111/all.12423

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Vierk, KA, Koehler, KM, Fein, SB, and Street, DA. Prevalence of self-reported food allergy in American adults and use of food labels. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2007) 119:1504–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.03.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ontiveros, N, Rodríguez-Bellegarrigue, CI, Galicia-Rodríguez, G, Vergara-Jiménez, M, Zepeda-Gómez, EM, Arámburo-Galvez, JG, et al. Prevalence of self-reported gluten-related disorders and adherence to a gluten-free diet in Salvadoran adult population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:786. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040786

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Cabrera-Chávez, F, Dezar, GVA, Islas-Zamorano, AP, Espinoza-Alderete, JG, Vergara-Jiménez, MJ, Magaña-Ordorica, D, et al. Prevalence of self-reported gluten sensitivity and adherence to a gluten-free diet in Argentinian adult population. Nutrients. (2017) 9:81. doi: 10.3390/nu9010081

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gupta, RS, Warren, CM, Smith, BM, Jiang, J, Blumenstock, JA, Davis, MM, et al. Prevalence and severity of food allergies among US adults. JAMA Netw Open. (2019) 2:e185630–10. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5630

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Palosuo, K, Varjonen, E, Kekki, OM, Klemola, T, Kalkkinen, N, Alenius, H, et al. Wheat omega-5 gliadin is a major allergen in children with immediate allergy to ingested wheat. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2001) 108:634–8. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.118602

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Matsuo, H, Morita, E, Tatham, AS, Morimoto, K, Horikawa, T, Osuna, H, et al. Identification of the IgE-binding epitope in ω-5 gliadin, a major allergen in wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279:12135–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311340200

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Morita, E, Matsuo, H, Mihara, S, Morimoto, K, Savage, AWJ, and Tatham, AS. Fast omega-gliadin is a major allergen in wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. J Dermatol Sci. (2003) 33:99–104. doi: 10.1016/s0923-1811(03)00156-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Palosuo, K, Alenius, H, Varjonen, E, Koivuluhta, M, Mikkola, J, Keskinen, H, et al. A novel wheat gliadin as a cause of exercise-induced anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (1999) 103:912–7. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70438-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Matsuo, H, Kohno, K, Niihara, H, and Morita, E. Specific IgE determination to epitope peptides of omega-5 gliadin and high molecular weight glutenin subunit is a useful tool for diagnosis of wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. J Immunol. (2005) 175:8116–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8116

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Battais, F, Courcoux, P, Popineau, Y, Kanny, G, Moneret-Vautrin, DA, and Denery-Papini, S. Food allergy to wheat: differences in immunoglobulin E-binding proteins as a function of age or symptoms. J Cereal Sci. (2005) 42:109–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.01.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bouchez-Mahiout, I, Snégaroff, J, Tylichova, M, Pecquet, C, Branlard, G, and Laurière, M. Low molecular weight glutenins in wheat-dependant, exercise-induced anaphylaxis: allergenicity and antigenic relationships with omega 5-gliadins. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. (2010) 153:35–45. doi: 10.1159/000301577

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Kennard, L, Thomas, I, Rutkowski, K, Azzu, V, Yong, PFK, Kasternow, B, et al. A multicenter evaluation of diagnosis and management of omega-5 gliadin allergy (also known as wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis) in 132 adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. (2018) 6:1892–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.02.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Matsuo, H, Kohno, K, and Morita, E. Molecular cloning, recombinant expression and IgE-binding epitope of omega-5 gliadin, a major allergen in wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. FEBS J. (2005) 272:4431–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04858.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Battais, F, Mothes, T, Moneret-Vautrin, DA, Pineau, F, Kanny, G, Popineau, Y, et al. Identification of IgE-binding epitopes on gliadins for patients with food allergy to wheat. Allergy. (2005) 60:815–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00795.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Matsuo, H, Yokooji, T, and Taogoshi, T. Common food allergens and their IgE-binding epitopes. Allergol Int. (2015) 64:332–43. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2015.06.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Comino, I, Fernández-Bañares, F, Esteve, M, Ortigosa, L, Castillejo, G, Fambuena, B, et al. Fecal gluten peptides reveal limitations of serological tests and food questionnaires for monitoring gluten-free diet in celiac disease patients. Am J Gastroenterol. (2016) 111:1456–65. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.439

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Gil-Humanes, J, Pistón, F, Tollefsen, S, Sollid, LM, and Barro, F. Effective shutdown in the expression of celiac disease-related wheat gliadin T-cell epitopes by RNA interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:17023–8. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1007773107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Pistón, F, Gil-Humanes, J, and Barro, F. Integration of promoters, inverted repeat sequences and proteomic data into a model for high silencing efficiency of coeliac disease related gliadins in bread wheat. BMC Plant Biol. (2013) 13:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Barro, F, Iehisa, JCM, Giménez, MJ, García-Molina, MD, Ozuna, CV, Comino, I, et al. Targeting of prolamins by RNAi in bread wheat: effectiveness of seven silencing-fragment combinations for obtaining lines devoid of coeliac disease epitopes from highly immunogenic gliadins. Plant Biotechnol J. (2016) 14:986–96. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12455

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Pistón, F, Marín, S, Hernando, A, and Barro, F. Analysis of the activity of a γ-gliadin promoter in transgenic wheat and characterization of gliadin synthesis in wheat by MALDI-TOF during grain development. Mol Breed. (2009) 23:655–67. doi: 10.1007/s11032-009-9263-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Pistón, F, León, E, Lazzeri, PA, and Barro, F. Isolation of two storage protein promoters from Hordeum chilense and characterization of their expression patterns in transgenic wheat. Euphytica. (2008) 162:371–9. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9530-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Marín-Sanz, M, Giménez, MJ, Barro, F, and Savin, R. Prolamin content and grain weight in RNAi silenced wheat lines under different conditions of temperature and nitrogen availability. Front Plant Sci. (2020) 11:314. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00314

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Golenkov, WF. ICC standard No. 105/2: determination of crude protein in cereals and cereal products for food and for feed International Association for Cereal Science and Technology (1994) Available at: https://books.google.es/books?id=wJG3OAAACAAJ.

Google Scholar

39. Gil-Humanes, J, Pistón, F, Shewry, PR, Tosi, P, and Barro, F. Suppression of gliadins results in altered protein body morphology in wheat. J Exp Bot. (2011) 62:4203–13. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Gil-Humanes, J, Pistón, F, Rosell, CM, and Barro, F. Significant down-regulation of γ-gliadins has minor effect on gluten and starch properties of bread wheat. J Cereal Sci. (2012) 56:161–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2012.02.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Haro, C, Guzmán-López, MH, Marín-Sanz, M, Sánchez-León, S, Vaquero, L, Pastor, J, et al. Consumption of tritordeum bread reduces immunogenic gluten intake without altering the gut microbiota. Foods. (2022) 11:1439. doi: 10.3390/foods11101439

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Sollid, LM, Tye-Din, JA, Qiao, S-W, Anderson, RP, Gianfrani, C, and Koning, F. Update 2020: nomenclature and listing of celiac disease-relevant gluten epitopes recognized by CD4+ T cells. Immunogenetics. (2020) 72:85–8. doi: 10.1007/s00251-019-01141-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Sollid, LM, Qiao, S-W, Anderson, RP, Gianfrani, C, and Koning, F. Nomenclature and listing of celiac disease relevant gluten T-cell epitopes restricted by HLA-DQ molecules. Immunogenetics. (2012) 64:455–60. doi: 10.1007/s00251-012-0599-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Maiuri, L, Ciacci, C, Ricciardelli, I, Vacca, L, Raia, V, Auricchio, S, et al. Association between innate response to gliadin and activation of pathogenic T cells in coeliac disease. Lancet. (2003) 362:30–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13803-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Amnuaycheewa, P, Niemann, L, Goodman, RE, Baumert, JL, and Taylor, SL. Challenges in gluten analysis: a comparison of four commercial sandwich ELISA kits. Foods. (2022) 11:706. doi: 10.3390/foods11050706

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Morón, B, Cebolla, A, Manyani, H, Alvarez-Maqueda, M, Megías, M, Thomas, MDC, et al. Sensitive detection of cereal fractions that are toxic to celiac disease patients by using monoclonal antibodies to a main immunogenic wheat peptide. Am J Clin Nutr. (2008) 87:405–14. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.2.405

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Pistón, F, Gil-Humanes, J, Rodríguez-Quijano, M, and Barro, F. Down-regulating γ-gliadins in bread wheat leads to non-specific increases in other gluten proteins and has no major effect on dough gluten strength. PLoS One. (2011) 6:e24754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024754

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Sánchez-León, S, Gil-Humanes, J, Ozuna, CV, Giménez, MJ, Sousa, C, Voytas, DF, et al. Low-gluten, nontransgenic wheat engineered with CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnol J. (2018) 16:902–10. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12837

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Altenbach, SB, Chang, H-C, Yu, XB, Seabourn, BW, Green, PH, and Alaedini, A. Elimination of omega-1,2 gliadins from bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) flour: effects on immunogenic potential and end-use quality. Front Plant Sci. (2019) 10:580. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00580

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Altenbach, SB, Tanaka, CK, and Seabourn, BW. Silencing of omega-5 gliadins in transgenic wheat eliminates a major source of environmental variability and improves dough mixing properties of flour. BMC Plant Biol. (2014) 14:393. doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0393-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Skoczowski, A, Obtułowicz, K, Czarnobilska, E, Dyga, W, Mazur, M, Stawoska, I, et al. Antibody reactivity in patients with IgE-mediated wheat allergy to various subunits and fractions of gluten and non-gluten proteins from ω-gliadin-free wheat genotypes. Ann Agric Environ Med. (2017) 24:229–36. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1233572

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Daengsuwan, T, Palosuo, K, Phankingthongkum, S, Visitsunthorn, N, Jirapongsananuruk, O, Alenius, H, et al. IgE antibodies to omega-5 gliadin in children with wheat-induced anaphylaxis. Allergy. (2005) 60:506–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00656.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Morita, E, Chinuki, Y, and Takahashi, H. Recent advances of in vitro tests for the diagnosis of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. J Dermatol Sci. (2013) 71:155–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.04.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Morón, B, Bethune, MT, Comino, I, Manyani, H, Ferragud, M, López, MC, et al. Toward the assessment of food toxicity for celiac patients: characterization of monoclonal antibodies to a main immunogenic gluten peptide. PLoS One. (2008) 3:e2294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002294

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Guzmán-López, MH, Sánchez-León, S, Marín-Sanz, M, Comino, I, Segura, V, Vaquero, L, et al. Oral consumption of bread from an RNAi wheat line with strongly silenced gliadins elicits no immunogenic response in a pilot study with celiac disease patients. Nutrients. (2021) 13:4548. doi: 10.3390/nu13124548

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: RNAi, gluten, IgE, wheat, wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA), reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), non-gluten proteins (NGPs)

Citation: Guzmán-López MH, Ruipérez V, Marín-Sanz M, Ojeda-Fernández I, Ojeda-Fernández P, Garrote-Adrados JA, Arranz-Sanz E and Barro F (2024) Identification of RNAi hypoallergic bread wheat lines for wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis patients. Front. Nutr. 10:1319888. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1319888

Received: 11 October 2023; Accepted: 26 December 2023;
Published: 16 January 2024.

Edited by:

Marcio Schmiele, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Brazil

Reviewed by:

Michael Tilley, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States
Eishin Morita, Shimane University, Japan
Mongkhon Sompornrattanaphan, Mahidol University, Thailand

Copyright © 2024 Guzmán-López, Ruipérez, Marín-Sanz, Ojeda-Fernández, Ojeda-Fernández, Garrote-Adrados, Arranz-Sanz and Barro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Francisco Barro, fbarro@ias.csic.es

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Download