Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 08 September 2025

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1629685

The association between dietary diversity and hearing loss: results from a nationwide survey

Qiaoqiao DuQiaoqiao Du1Haizhen YangHaizhen Yang1Hua ZhangHua Zhang2Yao YaoYao Yao3Zhongmin WenZhongmin Wen1Xiaojun Zhu
Xiaojun Zhu1*Xiangyang Gao
Xiangyang Gao4*
  • 1Health Management Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
  • 2Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 3China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 4Health Management Center of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College, Luohe, China

Background: Hearing loss is a leading cause of disability among older adults. Previous studies have suggested that dietary factors may play a role in preventing hearing loss. However, findings remain inconsistent, and longitudinal evidence is limited. Based on a national sample, this study aims to explore the association between the different dietary diversity score (DDS) and hearing loss in the older adult Chinese population.

Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) spanning 2011 to 2018. The study recruited participants aged 60 years and older from the 2011 and 2014 CLHLS waves, with follow-up assessments in 2014 and 2018. Hearing loss was assessed through a questionnaire, while dietary diversity was evaluated using four DDS indicators: total diet, animal-based diet, protein-based diet, and plant-based diet. Cox regression models were employed to examine the relationship between various DDS categories and hearing loss, with adjustments for confounding factors. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression was employed to explore the relationship between DDS and hearing loss. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to further validate the findings.

Results: The cohort study included 3,839 older adults (mean age 79.1 ± 9.3 years) without hearing loss at baseline, comprising 1874 males (48.8%) and 1965 females (51.2%). The mean follow-up duration was 4.2 years (SD 1.9). The incidence of hearing loss was 47.6% (1827/3839). After adjusting for confounding factors, higher plant-based DDS (HR = 0.783; 95% CI: 0.637–0.962, P-trend = 0.027) was associated with a reduced risk of hearing loss. The RCS analysis indicated a negative linear association between plant-based DDS and hearing loss (p for linearity = 0.014). Sensitivity analysis further verified the robustness of the above findings. Similar results were observed in adults aged ≥80 years, males, and individuals without hypertension, diabetes, or heart disease.

Conclusion: Dietary diversity in plant-based diet serves as a protective factor against hearing loss in the older adult population. Adopting a diversified plant-based diet may help reduce the risk of hearing loss among older adults.

1 Introduction

Hearing plays a crucial role in social communication and cognitive functioning. With global life expectancy rising, age-related hearing loss has emerged as a major public health challenge, ranking among the top causes of disability in older adult populations worldwide (1, 2). According to the 2019 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study, hearing loss affects over 1.57 billion individuals globally, and is potentially reaching 2.31 billion people by 2050 (3, 4). China has experienced a particularly pronounced increase in hearing loss prevalence with population aging. Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) constitutes the primary etiology of hearing disability nationwide. Epidemiological data show that 68.2% of all hearing loss cases in China are concentrated among middle-aged and older adult aged 50 and above (3). Among octogenarians with hearing loss, approximately 50% present with moderate-to-profound auditory loss (3).

The consequences of hearing loss extend beyond sensory loss, significantly impacting quality of life, mental health, social relationships, and cognitive function (1, 5). Studies have demonstrated that hearing loss adversely impacts the communication and social engagement of older adults, which may subsequently increase the risk of cognitive decline, dementia, depression, anxiety, and loneliness (610). The etiology of hearing loss is multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, environmental exposures, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation (5, 1115). Recent research has highlighted the potential role of modifiable lifestyle factors, particularly diet, in hearing loss prevention (1619). Despite the complexities involved in elucidating the relationships between nutrients, overall diet, and auditory function, the literature does include a number of studies that provide evidence (17). Specific dietary nutrients have demonstrated dual effects on auditory health, with some components showing protective effects while others may increase hearing loss risk (2023). Previous studies have suggested that increasing consumption of vegetables, fruits, and cereal fiber has been associated with reduced hearing loss susceptibility (24). Supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), individual antioxidant, and mineral (calcium and magnesium) are associated with a decreased risk of hearing loss (19, 21, 2527). Conversely, a high-fat diet, high intake of carbohydrates and sugars appears to correlate positively with audio-vestibular dysfunction (1, 18, 19, 2830).

Studying individual nutrients or foods may offer an incomplete understanding of the relationship between diet and hearing loss, as diets are typically composed of combinations of foods and involve complex interactions among nutrients in our daily consumption. This highlights the need for comprehensive dietary analysis to better understand the relationship between nutrition and auditory health. Research evidence suggested that better diet quality and dietary patterns were significantly associated with a reduced risk of hearing loss (18, 3133). An inflammatory diet may increase the risk of developing sensorineural hearing loss (34). Healthy dietary patterns, particularly the DASH diet, were associated with a reduced risk of hearing loss and a slower cognitive decline following hearing loss (7). The Mediterranean diet and plant-based diets have been shown to contribute to the prevention of auditory vestibular dysfunction (30, 35). However, no significant associations were observed between dietary intake and the prevalence of hearing loss in the Blue Mountains Hearing Study (Australia) (33, 36).

Dietary diversity score (DDS) has been recognized as a practical and reliable indicator of overall diet quality, capturing the variety of foods consumed over a specified period (37). DDS has been established as a reliable and practical tool in large-scale epidemiological research, offering multiple methodological advantages, including its utility as a robust indicator of nutrient adequacy, its capacity for cross-cultural dietary comparisons, and its cost-effectiveness as a dietary assessment instrument (3739). Previous studies have established associations between DDS and various health outcomes, including reduced risks of cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndrome and improved cognitive performance (3942). In developing countries, where dietary patterns often lack diversity, promoting dietary variety has become an important public health strategy (39).

Despite the growing interest in the associations between diet and hearing loss, many previous studies have reported inconsistent results and a limited number of longitudinal investigations. Furthermore, the majority of studies have been carried out in developed countries, with limited evidence from developing nations, particularly in China, which has the world’s largest older population. This study aims to address these gaps by investigating the association between DDS and hearing loss prevalence among Chinese older adults. Using nationwide longitudinal data, we seek to provide evidence-based insights for developing dietary guidelines to prevent hearing loss in aging populations.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study population

Data from the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey (CLHLS) were utilized in this study. The CLHLS was conducted in 23 of the 31 provinces in mainland China employing a multistage, stratified cluster sampling design. The details of the sampling strategy have been thoroughly discussed in our prior studies (43, 44). This study selected the survey data of CLHLS from 2011 to 2018, with baseline participants recruited in 2011–2012 (n = 9,765) and in 2014 (n = 7,192). After excluding duplicate records (n = 6,066), 10,891 individuals were retained for initial analysis. We further excluded participants with incomplete hearing data or baseline hearing loss (n = 5,394), leaving 5,497 eligible individuals. Subsequent attrition due to loss to follow-up or death by 2018 (n = 1,602) reduced the sample to 3,895. Finally, after excluding cases with incomplete dietary diversity score (DDS) information (n = 56), 3,839 participants were included in the final analysis (Figure 1). Informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians, and the study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-13074).

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating participant selection from CLHLS for analysis. Starting with 16,957 total participants from 2011-2012 and 2014 cohorts. Exclusions included repeating data (6,066), hearing loss data (5,394), lost to follow-up or death by 2018 (1,602), and missing information in DDS (56). Final participants included in the analysis totaled 3,839.

Figure 1. Flowchart of participants selection.

2.2 Assessment of dietary diversity

DDS was developed in alignment with the Chinese Dietary Guidelines, which provide recommendations for the consumption of 10 primary food groups (38, 42). Baseline DDS assessment was conducted utilizing a validated food frequency questionnaire encompassing 10 core food categories: cereals, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, meat, eggs, fish, dairy products, and fungi. The scoring criteria were defined as follows: For cereals, vegetables, and fruits, a score of one point per category was assigned for regular consumption (“daily,” “almost daily,” or “frequently”); otherwise (“occasionally,” “rarely,” or “never”), 0 points were assigned. For fungi, legumes, nuts, meat, eggs, fish, and dairy products, one point per category was given for consumption (“almost daily” or “not daily but at least weekly”); otherwise (“less than weekly but at least monthly,” “less than monthly, sometimes,” “rarely,” or “never”), 0 points were assigned. The DDS of total diet for each participant ranges from 0 to 10. Based on previous research, we further evaluated different dietary diversities through the animal food group, plant food group, and protein food group (45, 46). The animal-based DDS, derived from four primary sources (meat, fish, eggs, and dairy products), ranged from 0 to 4 points based on consumption frequency. Similarly, the plant-based DDS, incorporating six food sources (cereals, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, and fungi), was calculated on a 0 to 6-point scale. Protein-rich food diversity was assessed across six sources (legumes, nuts, meat, eggs, fish, and dairy products), with the protein-based DDS ranging from 0 to 6 points based on consumption frequency.

2.3 Assessment of hearing loss

Hearing loss was evaluated through a dual assessment approach incorporating investigator observations and participant self-reports, utilizing a questionnaire that assessed auditory function through two primary questions. Questions 1 “Can you hear the interviewer’s questions clearly?” with response options: (1) yes, without requiring hearing aids; (2) yes, but requiring hearing aids; (3) partially, requiring hearing aids; and (4) no, cannot hear clearly. Questions 2 “Do you experience hearing difficulties?” with binary response options (Yes/No). Participants were classified as having hearing loss if they selected options (2), (3), or (4) for the first question and/or responded affirmatively (“Yes”) to the second question. All other responses were categorized as indicating normal hearing. Given that the specific onset time of hearing loss was not recorded in the CLHLS, this study estimated the occurrence of hearing loss under various scenarios. For participants who did not report hearing loss at their most recent follow-up, the event timing was determined as the difference between the year of the last survey and the baseline year. For those who did develop hearing loss, the timing was based on the difference between the earliest survey year of hearing loss onset and the baseline year.

2.4 Covariates

To enhance the reliability of our findings, we controlled for an extensive range of potential confounders. Demographic variables included gender (male/female), age group (60–79 years/≥80 years), socioeconomic factors (educational attainment [0, 1–6, and ≥7 years], marital status [married, unmarried, divorced, or widowed], pre-retirement occupation [agricultural/non-agricultural], and household income [<100,000/≥100,000 yuan]), lifestyle characteristics (sleep quality [good/general or poor], current smoking [yes/no], current consuming alcohol [yes/no], and current physical activities [yes/no]), chronic diseases (yes/no), and body mass index (BMI). Weight and height were obtained using standardized anthropometric protocols. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters (kg/m2). The chronic diseases primarily encompassed hypertension, diabetes and heart disease.

2.5 Statistical analysis

The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical variables. Group comparisons were performed using Chi-square tests for qualitative variables and independent t-tests for quantitative variables. Missing covariates were addressed through multiple imputation methods. The hazard ratios (HRs) for hearing loss associated with DDS, analyzed both as continuous and quartile categorical variables, were estimated using cox proportional hazards models. Four sequential models were constructed: Model 1 was unadjusted. Model 2 was adjusted to account for demographic factors, including gender, age, household income, education level, marital status, and pre-retirement occupation. Model 3 additionally adjusted for lifestyle factors, including physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and sleep status, and Model 4 further adjusted for clinical factors (BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease). To assess the robustness of our findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding participants who were unable to respond due to hearing loss and those with pre-existing hearing problems before age 40. Stratified analyses were performed based on gender (male/female), age group (60–79 years/≥80 years), chronic diseases, and interactions between strata were examined. A restricted cubic spline analysis was employed to investigate the dose–response relationship between DDS and hearing loss. Statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.4.6. A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 The characteristics of study participants

The study population comprised 1,965 females (51.2%), 1,924 married individuals (50.3%), 1,727 urban residents (45.0%), and 3,001 manual laborers (80.2%), with a mean age of 79.84 ± 9.9 years, stratified into 2071 participants aged 60–79 years and 1,768 participants aged ≥80 years. Educational attainment distribution revealed 1859 illiterate participants (48.6%), 1,400 with primary education (36.6%), and 569 with junior high school or higher education (14.9%). Participants were categorized into quartiles based on baseline DDS levels, with comparative analyses demonstrating statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) across all demographic characteristics except smoking and consuming alcohol. The mean follow-up duration was 4.2 years (SD 1.9). Longitudinal follow-up revealed an overall hearing loss incidence of 47.6% (1827/3839), with statistically significant interquartile differences (P = 0.023), showing the lowest incidence rate in the highest DDS quartile group (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of all participants by quartiles of DDS.

3.2 DDS and hearing loss

In Table 2, Cox regression models were employed to evaluate the associations between total DDS and DDS from different food sources with hearing loss risk. In Model 1, higher DDS (4th vs. 1st quartile) was associated with reduced hearing loss incidence. Total diet (HR = 0.834, 95% CI: 0.738–0.942), animal-based diet (HR = 0.752, 95% CI: 0.601–0.941), protein-based diet (HR = 0.773, 95% CI: 0.649–0.921), and plant-based diet (HR = 0.665, 95% CI: 0.555–0.797). Trend analyses revealed significant dose–response relationships for total diet (P-trend = 0.002), protein-based diet (P-trend = 0.007), and plant-based diet (P-trend<0.001). In Model 2 adjusted for gender, age, residence, annual household income, education level, marital status, and pre-retirement occupation, these associations persisted. Specifically, plant-based diet (HR = 0.749, 95% CI: 0.616–0.910) remained inversely associated with hearing loss in the highest quartile. Model 3 additionally adjusted for physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and sleep duration maintained significant inverse associations for plant-based diet (HR = 0.783, 95% CI: 0.644–0.953). In Model 4 with further adjustment for hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and BMI, the protective associations remained for plant-based diet (HR = 0.783, 95% CI: 0.637–0.962), with trend analyses remaining significant (P-trend = 0.027). Continuous plant-based diet DDS analysis also demonstrated significant associations. A restricted cubic spline analysis was employed to examine the dose–response relationship between DDS and hearing loss. After adjusting for covariates, we observed that only plant-based diet DDS (P for linearity = 0.014) showed a linear relationship with hearing loss (Figure 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Hazard ratio (HR) of hearing loss by quartiles of DDS among whole sample.

Figure 2
Four graphs labeled A, B, C, and D display hazard ratios with 95 percent confidence intervals against various dietary diversity scores (DDS) on the x-axis. Graph A shows Total DDS; B shows Animal-based DDS; C shows Protein-based DDS; D shows Plant-based DDS. Each graph marks quartiles Q1, Q2, and Q3 with dashed lines and provides p-values for overall and nonlinear trends. Graph A, B and C show a similar pattern, with hazard ratios starting and ending below one, peaking around one across the quartiles. In Graph D, the hazard ratio starts above one and decreases linearly to below one. Gray shading indicates confidence intervals.

Figure 2. Restricted cubic spline analysis showing the dose–response relationships between (A) total DDS, (B) animal-based DDS, (C) protein-based DDS, (D) plant-based DDS, and the risk of hearing loss based on Model 4. Model 4 was adjusted for gender, age, household income, education level, marital status, pre-retirement occupation, physical activities, current smoking, current consuming alcohol, sleep quality, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease. Total DDS ranges from 0 to 10; Animal-based DDS ranges from 0 to 4; Protein-based DDS ranges from 0 to 6; Plant-based DDS ranges from 0 to 6.

3.3 Subgroup analyses

Subgroup analysis conducted with Model 4 identified associations between plant-based diets and the risk of hearing loss across different gender, age and chronic diseases. Among males, plant-based DDS exhibited a protective effect (HR = 0.751, 95% CI: 0.567–0.995) in the highest quartile, supported by significant trend analysis (P-trend = 0.019). In the cohort aged ≥80 years, plant-based diets were associated with a reduced risk of hearing loss (HR = 0.672, 95% CI: 0.477–0.948). However, trend analysis did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.064). Among people without hypertension, compared with the lowest quartile, the second quartile of plant-based DDS had a significant protective effect (HR = 0.853, 95% CI: 0.736–0.987; P-trend = 0.043). Among individuals without diabetes, compared with the lowest quartile, the highest quartile of plant-based DDS showed a significant protective effect (HR = 0.761, 95% CI: 0.614–0.944; P-trend = 0.021). Among individuals without heart disease, compared with the lowest quartile, the HR (95% CI) for the second quartile and the highest quartile were 0.858 (0.753–0.977) and 0.743 (0.592–0.933), respectively. The trend analysis indicates significance (P-trend = 0.019). No statistically significant associations were observed among females or individuals aged 60–79 years or with chronic diseases (Supplementary Table 1). Figure 3 presents the results of the subgroup analyses, indicating that no significant interactions were detected when comparing the classes (P for interaction > 0.05).

Figure 3
Forest plots showing hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for various dietary diversity scores (DDS): total, animal-based, protein-based, and plant-based. Subgroups include gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease, divided into quartiles (Q1-Q4). HR values range from 0.2 to 2.6, with p-values for interaction testing statistical significance for each DDS type across subgroups.

Figure 3. Forest plots of the associations between DDS and risk of hearing loss in subgroups based on Model 4. Subgroups according to gender, age group, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease; Model 4 adjusted for gender, age, household income, education level, marital status, pre-retirement occupation, physical activities, current smoking, current consuming alcohol, sleep quality, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease; DDS, dietary diversity score; Q1-Q4: Lowest quartile to the highest quartile; Q1 as the reference group; all P for interaction >0.05.

3.4 Sensitivity analyses

Sensitivity analysis across various DDS categories yielded consistent results with Model 4, demonstrating stable associations between all DDS measures (total diet, animal-based diet, protein-based diet, and plant-based diet) and hearing loss risk, maintaining alignment with the findings presented in Table 2, even after the exclusion of participants who were unable to respond to questions due to hearing loss and those who developed hearing problems before age 40 (n = 74), as detailed in Table 3.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Sensitivity analysis of DDS with hearing loss based on Model4.

4 Discussion

This study evaluated associations of DDS with hearing loss and revealed a potential protective effect of DDS. We utilized a longitudinal dataset comprising one of the most extensive collections of the oldest-old populations in China and stratified by gender and age. Our study findings indicate that higher total diet DDS, particularly in the highest quartile, is associated with the lowest incidence of hearing loss among Chinese older adults. Specifically, plant-based DDS demonstrated a significant negative correlation with hearing loss. As the quartiles of DDS increased, the risk of hearing loss decreased. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these associations, particularly for plant-based diets. Subgroup analyses further revealed that these associations were more pronounced in men. However, no significant associations were observed between total diet, animal-based diet, protein-based diet and hearing loss.

Previous studies have demonstrated that diversified, well-balanced, and nutritionally dense dietary patterns hold significant potential to decelerate the aging process and promote healthy aging via multiple underlying mechanisms (24, 38). The adherence to healthy eating patterns has been shown to be associated with numerous positive health outcomes (47). Multiple studies have shown that a diet high in variety, especially one rich in antioxidants, dietary fiber, Omega-3 fatty acids, niacin, retinol and folic acid, is associated with a reduced risk of hearing loss (5, 18, 19, 26). According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES), adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet, characterized by high diversity and richness in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and olive oil, was significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of high-frequency hearing loss among individuals aged 50 years or older (42). Better diet quality, as evaluated by indices such as the Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010), was associated with a reduced risk of self-reported hearing loss in female population (31). A cross-sectional study has shown that higher dietary diversity is associated with better auditory sustained attention (39). Dietary diversity may reduce oxidative damage in cochlea through the synergistic action of multiple nutrients. DDS is a quantitative tool to assess dietary variety, promoting comprehensive and balanced nutrition. By emphasizing overall dietary patterns rather than isolated nutrients or foods, it helps mitigate malnutrition risks and diet-related diseases linked to monotonous eating habits. Additionally, the DDS ensures adequate intake of essential macronutrients and micronutrients through diversified food choices.

The observed associations between plant-based dietary diversity and hearing loss may potentially be attributed to multiple underlying mechanisms. Oxidative stress and systemic inflammation are key contributors to age-related hearing loss (48). A diverse diet, particularly one rich in plant-based foods, may protect hearing function through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory pathways, as well as enhanced microcirculation (35). Antioxidant-rich diets (e.g., vitamins C and E, carotenoids) can mitigate oxidative damage to cochlear cells, while anti-inflammatory diets may reduce inner ear inflammation (26, 49, 50). Prior studies suggest that higher oxidative balance scores (OBS) are inversely associated with the risk of hearing loss and tinnitus (11, 51). Similarly, elevated composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) levels correlate with reduced odds of hearing loss (12). Previous cross-sectional study of this cohort detected higher adherence to plant-based or healthy plant-based dietary indices correlates with a lower prevalence of hearing loss (35). Diets rich in anti-inflammatory and antioxidant components may reduce the risk of ARHL by up to 50%. Conversely, pro-inflammatory diets may increase the risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) (47). Excessive consumption of fats, and cholesterol has been linked to hearing loss, likely due to their association with cardiovascular diseases and impaired cochlear perfusion. Chronic high-fat diets may also alter gut microbiota, triggering systemic immune responses that compromise the blood-labyrinthine barrier (BLB) and promote cochlear inflammation. These findings highlighting the potential role of dietary interventions in prevention.

Plant-based DDS, emphasizing high intake of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, nuts, and legumes, provide abundant antioxidants and phytochemicals that protect against age-related damage. Such diets may also prevent vascular dysfunction by improving lipid profiles, endothelial function, and blood pressure, thereby enhancing cochlear blood flow. Additionally, healthy diets may reduce neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in the central auditory pathway. Balanced diets promote vascular health, which is critical for maintaining inner ear microcirculation (52). Vegetable and fruit intake, particularly dark-colored varieties, leafy greens, berries, and citrus fruits, is associated with reduced risk of age-related hearing loss (ARHL), specifically high-frequency loss (18). Cohort studies indicate a 20–30% lower risk in high-intake groups relative to low-intake counterparts (26, 32). Legumes consumption correlates with favorable auditory outcomes within healthy dietary patterns, though dedicated studies remain limited. Legumes are consistently included as health-promoting components in diet quality assessments. Nuts consumption (≥2 servings/week) demonstrates an inverse association with hearing loss risk, putatively attributed to unsaturated fatty acids, vitamin E, and polyphenols (53). As a key constituent of the Mediterranean diet, nuts contribute to its established auditory benefits. Cereals confer protective effects compared to refined grains. High-glycemic-load diets elevate risk, whereas whole grain-induced stabilization of blood glucose levels supports auditory preservation (30). Fungi, containing ergothioneine and vitamin D, align with hearing-protective dietary principles when incorporated into plant-based diets. However, direct epidemiological evidence is currently lacking. Critically, protection primarily derives from synergistic interactions within plant-dominant dietary patterns (Mediterranean, DASH diets), as opposed to isolated foods or nutrients.

We observed variations in the associations between dietary diversity and hearing loss across gender, age groups and chronic diseases. The protective effects of plant-based dietary diversity were more pronounced in men aged 60–79, potentially attributable to higher intake of dietary antioxidants at younger ages, which may be more effective in preventing hearing loss. Hormonal decline associated with aging may also impact hearing, particularly through the reduction in estrogen levels among females (54, 55). The decline in estrogen levels in postmenopausal women contributes to increased oxidative stress. In our study, given the relatively high proportion of older adult women, the prolonged menopause period and lower sex hormone levels may obscure the independent protective effect of diet (56). These findings underscore the preventive potential of dietary interventions during the premenopausal period. Analysis of non-chronic disease subgroups in Japan’s NILS-LSA cohort revealed that the highest plant diversity group (≥6 species/day) had a 24% lower risk of hearing loss (57). In normotensive individuals, higher fruit and vegetable intake is inversely associated with hearing loss risk, while nut and legume consumption demonstrates significant protective effects (potentially mediated by magnesium and B vitamins). Furthermore, folate and vitamin C intake is negatively correlated with hearing loss risk among non-hypertensive women (26). While some studies suggest plant-based dietary diversity provides stronger protection in chronic disease populations, the relatively small proportion of such individuals in our study may introduce potential selection bias.

Our study possesses several strengths. First, we utilized a large, nationally representative sample of older adults in China, which enhances the generalizability of our findings. We made a prospective observation and conducted stratification analyses based on sex and age. Second, we employed DDS as a comprehensive measure of dietary quality, which avoids the limitations of focusing on specific nutrients or foods. Third, sensitivity analyses, which excluded participants who were unable to respond to questions due to hearing loss and those who developed hearing problems before age 40, confirmed the stability of our results. However, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, dietary data were self-reported, which may introduce memory bias and inaccuracies in reflecting actual food intake. Second, we lacked information on noise exposure, a critical confounding factor in hearing loss studies. Finally, despite adjusting for an extensive array of confounders, we cannot entirely exclude the possibility of residual or unmeasured confounding, given the inherent limitations of our observational study design.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, our study provides evidence that higher dietary diversity, particularly in plant-based diets, is associated with a reduced risk of hearing loss in older adults. These findings underscore the importance of promoting dietary diversity as a potential strategy for preventing hearing loss. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms in greater detail and investigate the potential benefits of dietary interventions in diverse populations.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found: https://doi.org/10.18170/DVN/WBO7LK.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The Ethics Committee of Peking University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

QD: Writing – original draft, Software, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. HY: Validation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. HZ: Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. YY: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. ZW: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. XZ: Validation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. XG: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by The “Gusu Medical Star” Youth Science and Technology Talent Support Project of Suzhou City.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the CLHLS research team, the field team, and every respondent for their time and efforts that they have devoted to the CLHLS project, which provided the data in this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1629685/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Ooi, TC, Ishak, WS, Sharif, R, Shahar, S, Rajab, NF, Singh, DKA, et al. Multidimensional risk factors of age-related hearing loss among Malaysian community-dwelling older adults. Clin Interv Aging. (2021) 16:2033–46. doi: 10.2147/cia.S340432

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Yichen Jin, TT, Reed, NS, Tucker, KL, Ferrucci, L, and Talegawkar, SA. Associations between dietary indices and hearing status among middle-older aged adults – results from the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Am J Clin Nutr. (2024) 119:1338–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.03.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wang, H, Chen, Y, Yang, Z, Zhu, L, Zhao, Y, and Tian, T. Estimation and projection of the burden of hearing loss in China: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. Public Health. (2024) 228:119–27. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.01.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dong, L, Dong, W, Zhang, S, Jin, Y, Jiang, Y, Li, Z, et al. Global trends and burden of age-related hearing loss: 32-year study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2025) 134:105847. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2025.105847

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Goncalves, LF, Mary de Paiva, K, Machado, MJ, Samelli, AG, and Haas, P. Effectiveness in preventing hearing loss: Meta-analysis of dietary consumption studies. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2024):15598276241231941. doi: 10.1177/15598276241231941

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Qin, A, Chen, C, Bao, B, Xin, T, and Xu, L. Estimating the impact of different types hearing loss on cognitive decline and the joint effect of hearing loss and depression on cognitive decline among older adults in China. J Affect Disord. (2024) 351:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.203

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Liu, X, Akhtar, US, Beck, T, Dennis, K, Evans, DA, and Rajan, KB. Hearing loss, diet, and cognitive decline: interconnections for dementia prevention. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. (2025) 12:100052. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100052

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Parada, H, Laughlin, GA, Yang, M, Nedjat-Haiem, FR, and McEvoy, LK. Dual impairments in visual and hearing acuity and age-related cognitive decline in older adults from the rancho Bernardo study of healthy aging. Age Ageing. (2021) 50:1268–76. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa285

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mahmoudi, E. Hearing, vision, or dual sensory impairment and dementia risk. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e211846. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1846

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Armstrong, NM, Vieira, C, Gendron, C, Brenowitz, W, Lin, F, Swenor, B, et al. Associations of dual sensory impairment with incident mobility and ADL difficulty. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2022) 70:1997–2007. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17764

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lai, H, Yin, J, and Yang, H. Association of oxidative balance score with hearing loss and tinnitus: NHANES 1999-2018. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1421605. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1421605

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Min, X, Kong, X, and Wang, W. L-shaped associations between composite dietary antioxidant index and hearing loss: a cross-sectional study from the National Health and nutrition examination survey. Biol Res Nurs. (2025) 27:28–36. doi: 10.1177/10998004241261400

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang, S, Luo, J, Zhang, F, Zhang, R, Ju, W, Wu, N, et al. Association between blood volatile organic aromatic compound concentrations and hearing loss in US adults. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24:623. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18065-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Le Prell, CG, Hackett, TA, and Ramachandran, R. Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: current issues in mammalian hearing. Curr Opin Physio. (2020) 18:32–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.07.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Yuan, L, Li, D, Tian, Y, and Sun, Y. The risk of hearing impairment from ambient air pollution and the moderating effect of a healthy diet: findings from the United Kingdom biobank. Front Cell Neurosci. (2022) 16:856124. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.856124

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ghosn, B, Azadbakht, L, Esmaeilpour, MRM, and Esmaillzadeh, A. The association between dietary total antioxidant capacity and hearing loss: results from the Tehran employees cohort study. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24:818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18108-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Spankovich, C, and Le Prell, CG. The role of diet in vulnerability to noise-induced cochlear injury and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. (2019) 146:4033–43. doi: 10.1121/1.5132707

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Dawes, P, Cruickshanks, KJ, Marsden, A, Moore, DR, and Munro, KJ. Relationship between diet, tinnitus, and hearing difficulties. Ear Hear. (2020) 41:289–99. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000765

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lee, HJ, Lee, J, Yoon, C, Park, Y, Joo, YH, Park, JO, et al. Association of dietary factors with noise-induced hearing loss in Korean population: a 3-year national cohort study. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0279884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279884

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Gao, Z, Dai, Y, Liu, T, Wu, Y, and Zhang, X. L-shaped relationship between dietary niacin intake and hearing loss in United States adults: national health and nutrition examination survey. PLoS One. (2025) 20:e0319386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319386

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Kang, JW, Choi, HS, Kim, K, and Choi, JY. Dietary vitamin intake correlates with hearing thresholds in the older population: the Korean National Health and nutrition examination survey. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 99:1407–13. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.072793

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Tang, D, Tran, Y, Shekhawat, GS, and Gopinath, B. Dietary flavonoid intake and chronic sensory conditions: a scoping review. Antioxidants. (2022) 11:1214. doi: 10.3390/antiox11071214

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Xia, F, and Ren, Y. Association between caffeine intake from foods and beverages in the diet and hearing loss in United States adults. Front Neurol. (2024) 15:1436238. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1436238

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Emami, SF. Hearing and diet (narrative review). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2024) 76:1447–53. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04238-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wei, X. Dietary magnesium and calcium intake is associated with lower risk of hearing loss in older adults: a cross-sectional study of NHANES. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:10.1101764. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1101764

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Curhan, SG, Stankovic, KM, Eavey, RD, Wang, M, Stampfer, MJ, and Curhan, GC. Carotenoids, vitamin a, vitamin C, vitamin E, and folate and risk of self-reported hearing loss in women. Am J Clin Nutr. (2015) 102:1167–75. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.109314

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zhang, X, Luo, Q, Huang, Z, and Xiang, X. Association between nineteen dietary fatty acids and hearing thresholds: findings from a nationwide survey. Lipids Health Dis. (2023) 22:126. doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-01896-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Dillard, LK, Nelson-Bakkum, E, Schultz, A, Merten, N, and Malecki, K. Associations of dietary intake with self-reported hearing loss: findings from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. J Speech Lang Hear Res. (2023) 66:2478–89. doi: 10.1044/2023_jslhr-22-00473

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Tang, TH, Hwang, JH, Yang, TH, Hsu, CJ, Wu, CC, and Liu, TC. Can nutritional intervention for obesity and comorbidities slow down age-related hearing impairment? Nutrients. (2019) 11:1668. doi: 10.3390/nu11071668

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chen, H-L, Tan, C-T, Wu, C-C, and Liu, T-C. Effects of diet and lifestyle on audio-vestibular dysfunction in the elderly: a literature review. Nutrients. (2022) 14:4720. doi: 10.3390/nu14224720

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Curhan, SG, Wang, M, Eavey, RD, Stampfer, MJ, and Curhan, GC. Adherence to healthful dietary patterns is associated with lower risk of hearing loss in women. J Nutr. (2018) 148:944–51. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy058

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Spankovich, C, and Le Prell, CG. Healthy diets, healthy hearing: National Health and nutrition examination survey, 1999-2002. Int J Audiol. (2013) 52:369–76. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.780133

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Gopinath, B, Schneider, J, Flood, VM, McMahon, CM, Burlutsky, G, Leeder, SR, et al. Association between diet quality with concurrent vision and hearing impairment in older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. (2014) 18:251–6. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0408-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Wang, Y, Nie, J, Yan, K, Wang, J, Wang, X, and Zhao, Y. Inflammatory diet, gut microbiota and sensorineural hearing loss: a cross-sectional and Mendelian randomization study. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1458484. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1458484

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Song, X, Tian, Z, Jiang, K, He, K, Huang, Y, Hu, C, et al. Associations between plant-based dietary patterns and sensory impairments among Chinese older adults: based on the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey. Gerontology. (2024) 70:1042–54. doi: 10.1159/000540611

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Lengele, L, Sourdet, S, Soriano, G, Rolland, Y, Soler, V, and de Souto Barreto, P. Cross-sectional associations of dietary intake with hearing and vision capacities and potential mediation effect of inflammation in older adults: the COGFRAIL study. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2023) 35:1325–37. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02418-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Nachvak, SM, Abdollahzad, H, Mostafai, R, Moradi, S, Pasdar, Y, Rezaei, M, et al. Dietary diversity score and its related factors among employees of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Clin Nutr Res. (2017) 6:247–55. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2017.6.4.247

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Shen, X, Chen, X, Chen, X, Li, Z, Lin, J, Huang, H, et al. Association of vision and hearing impairment and dietary diversity among the oldest old in China: findings from the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24:1997. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19482-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Shiraseb, F, Siassi, F, Qorbani, M, Sotoudeh, G, Rostami, R, Narmaki, E, et al. Higher dietary diversity is related to better visual and auditory sustained attention. Br J Nutr. (2016) 115:1470–80. doi: 10.1017/s0007114516000428

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lin, IH, Duong, TV, Nien, S-W, Tseng, IH, Wang, H-H, Chiang, Y-J, et al. Dietary diversity score: implications for obesity prevention and nutrient adequacy in renal transplant recipients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:5083. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145083

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Moustakim, R, Mziwira, M, El Ayachi, M, and Belahsen, R. Dietary diversity score and the incidence of chronic kidney disease in an agricultural Moroccan adults population. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. (2022) 73:293–301. doi: 10.32394/rpzh.2022.0221

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Zhang, J, and Zhao, A. Dietary diversity and healthy aging: a prospective study. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1787. doi: 10.3390/nu13061787

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Zeng, Y, Feng, Q, Hesketh, T, Christensen, K, and Vaupel, JW. Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study. Lancet. (2017) 389:1619–29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30548-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Yao, Y, Chen, H, Chen, L, Ju, SY, Yang, H, Zeng, Y, et al. Type of tea consumption and depressive symptoms in Chinese older adults. BMC Geriatr. (2021) 21:331. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02203-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Doustmohammadian, A, Amirkalali, B, Gholizadeh, E, Khoonsari, M, Faraji, AH, Nikkhah, M, et al. Mediators of dietary diversity score (DDS) on NAFLD in Iranian adults: a structural equation modeling study. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2022) 77:370–9. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01240-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Zhao, H, Zhang, J, Zhou, J, and Ma, Y. Dietary diversity and possible cataract among Chinese elderly population. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1342190. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1342190

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Goncalves, LF, de Paiva, KM, Machado, MJ, Fontanelli, RCF, Cigana, LB, and Haas, P. Association of hearing loss and eating habits in the older population. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2025) 19:361–7. doi: 10.1177/15598276231216392

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Tang, D, Tran, Y, Dawes, P, and Gopinath, B. A narrative review of lifestyle risk factors and the role of oxidative stress in age-related hearing loss. Antioxidants. (2023) 12:878. doi: 10.3390/antiox12040878

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Chen, Z, Yu, L, Li, W, Zhang, H, Huang, X, Chen, W, et al. Association of vitamins with hearing loss, vision disorder and sleep problem in the US general population. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. (2023) 30:53876–86. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26164-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Hou, S, Chen, P, He, J, Chen, J, Zhang, J, Mammano, F, et al. Dietary intake of deuterium oxide decreases cochlear metabolism and oxidative stress levels in a mouse model of age-related hearing loss. Redox Biol. (2022) 57:102472. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102472

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Zhou, Z, and Han, Y. Association between oxidative balance score and hearing loss: a cross-sectional study from the NHANES database. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1375545. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1375545

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Shin, YU, Park, SH, Chung, JH, Lee, SH, and Cho, H. Diabetic retinopathy and hearing loss: results from the fifth Korean National Health and nutrition survey. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:2398. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112398

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Bizzozero-Peroni, B, Díaz-Goñi, V, Beneit, N, Oliveira, A, Jiménez-López, E, Martínez-Vizcaíno, V, et al. Nut consumption is associated with a lower risk of all-cause dementia in adults: a community-based cohort study from the UK biobank. Geroscience. (2025) 47:1721–33. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01365-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Hultcrantz, M, Simonoska, R, and Stenberg, AE. Estrogen and hearing: a summary of recent investigations. Acta Otolaryngol. (2006) 126:10–4. doi: 10.1080/00016480510038617

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Delhez, A, Lefebvre, P, Pequeux, C, Malgrange, B, and Delacroix, L. Auditory function and dysfunction: estrogen makes a difference. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2020) 77:619–35. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03295-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Chen, Z, Lu, Y, Chen, C, Lin, S, Xie, T, Luo, X, et al. Association between tinnitus and hearing impairment among older adults with age-related hearing loss: a multi-center cross-sectional study. Front Neurol. (2024) 15:1501561. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1501561

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Honda, T, Ohara, T, Hata, J, Yoshida, D, Hirakawa, Y, Kishimoto, H, et al. Plant-based diet diversity and risk of hearing loss in older Japanese adults: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Nutr. (2024) 63:887–98. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03318-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dietary diversity, older adults, hearing loss, plant-based diet, CLHLS

Citation: Du Q, Yang H, Zhang H, Yao Y, Wen Z, Zhu X and Gao X (2025) The association between dietary diversity and hearing loss: results from a nationwide survey. Front. Nutr. 12:1629685. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1629685

Received: 21 May 2025; Accepted: 21 August 2025;
Published: 08 September 2025.

Edited by:

Jun Wang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China

Reviewed by:

Masato Fujioka, Kitasato University, Japan
Shipeng Zhang, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China
Jia Luo, Qingdao University, China

Copyright © 2025 Du, Yang, Zhang, Yao, Wen, Zhu and Gao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiangyang Gao, MTM4MTExMzA4MDhAMTI2LmNvbQ==; Xiaojun Zhu, c3p6aHV4akAxNjMuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.