Osteocalcin serum concentrations and markers of energetic metabolism in pediatric patients. Systematic review and metanalysis

Abstract

Background:

Osteocalcin plays a role in glucose metabolism in mice, but its relevance in human energetic metabolism is controversial. Its relationship with markers of energetic metabolism in the pediatric population has not been systematically addressed in infants and adolescents.

Objective:

This study aims to assess the mean differences between tOC, ucOC, and cOC among healthy children and children with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1D or T2D) and the correlation of these bone molecules with metabolic markers.

Methods:

A systematic review and metanalysis were performed following PRISMA criteria to identify relevant observational studies published in English and Spanish using PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases. The risk of bias was assessed using New Castle–Ottawa scale. Effect size measures comprised standardized mean difference (SMD) and Pearson correlations. Heterogeneity and meta-regressions were performed.

Results:

The 20 studies included were of high quality and comprised 3,000 pediatric patients who underwent tOC, cOC, or ucOC measurements. Among healthy subjects, there was a positive correlation of ucOC with WC and weight, a positive correlation of tOC with FPG, HDL-c, WC, height, and weight, and a negative correlation between tOC and HbA1c. Among diabetic subjects, a negative correlation of ucOC with HbA1c and glycemia in both T1D and T2D was found and a negative correlation between tOC and HbA1c in T1D but not in T2D. The ucOC concentrations were lower in T2D, T1D, and patients with abnormal glucose status than among controls. The serum concentrations of tOC concentrations were lower among T1D than in controls. The patient's age, altitude, and HbA1c influenced the levels of serum tOC.

Conclusion:

Osteocalcin is involved in energy metabolism in pediatric subjects because it is consistently related to metabolic and anthropometric parameters.

Systematic Review Registration:

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42019138283.

Introduction

After the discovery of the effects of undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) in regulating glucose metabolism, insulin release, and insulin sensibility in mice (1), several studies in human have confirmed the relevance of this bone-derived hormone in the regulation of glucose metabolism in human adults (2–6).

In adults, previous metanalysis demonstrated significant differences in total osteocalcin (tOC) serum concentrations between type 2 diabetics (T2D) and healthy subjects (HS) (7, 8). Women with gestational diabetes exhibit significant differences in tOC serum levels compared to normal pregnant (9). However, the role of this hormone in regulating glycemia and insulin sensibility in children and adolescents has been briefly studied (10, 11), and no metanalysis formerly analyzed the role of osteocalcin in energetic metabolism nor its relationship to other metabolic parameters in this population.

During infancy and adolescence, osteocalcin serum levels are higher because of the highest osteoblast activity necessary to support bone growth and the high rate of bone remodeling (12, 13). Consequently, the osteocalcin serum levels increase to parallel the growth velocity curve (14).

Although some original studies report altered serum levels of tOC in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) (15, 16), few small studies have measured ucOC and cOC (two specific types of osteocalcin) in T1D (17). Furthermore, no clarity exists on the association of ucOC with energetic metabolism markers in healthy and T2D children. Since ucOC is claimed to be the osteocalcin type with a role in the modulation of energetic metabolism (18, 19), it is necessary to clarify the role of this hormone in metabolism in human children and adolescents.

In the present study, we analyze if there are significant differences in osteocalcin serum concentrations (cOC, ucOC, and total OC) between healthy and diabetic pediatric patients. In addition, we estimated the correlation of osteocalcin with markers of energetic metabolism in pediatric subjects with normal glycemic status and with T1D or T2D.

Material and methods

Protocol registration

This project was registered in the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number: CRD42019138283).

Eligibility criteria, information sources, and search strategy

A systematic search was executed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO databases to identify relevant studies published in English and Spanish restricted to human with no restriction in publication date. The query and keywords of the search are presented in Supplementary S1A. additional manual search was conducted to identify additional relevant publications. The first search was run on July 20, 2018. Afterward, the update was extended until March 20, 2022. This review was carried out adhering to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines (20), and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (21, 22). Two independent evaluators evaluated the abstracts (GCC & BJRN), blinded to authorship, authors' institutional affiliation, and study results. If the abstract fulfilled the inclusion criteria, full-text articles were then reviewed. The third and fourth investigators (JRVB & RJMP) independently resolved any disagreement between evaluators. Corresponding authors were reached by e-mail to request such data in the case of relevant studies with missing information.

Study selection

We include in this systematic review and meta-analysis only observational cross-sectional studies that included pediatric patients (less than 18 years old) with T1D, T2D, or nondiabetic controls reporting mean serum levels of osteocalcin (cOC, ucOC or tOC) and/or coefficient correlations between any type of osteocalcin (cOC, ucOC or tOC) and fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HabA1c, HDL-c, LDL-c, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), height, weight, and age. We excluded studies with no information on mean levels of osteocalcin or the previously mentioned correlations. Nondiabetic controls were those groups of individuals reported as healthy by the authors of the primary studies, namely subjects without type 1, type 2 diabetes, or carbohydrate intolerance.

Data extraction

The following information was extracted using a datasheet based on Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's data extraction template (23): author, year of publication, the country where the study was conducted, type of study, original inclusion and exclusion criteria, diabetes type, type of osteocalcin, the method for measurement of osteocalcin, intra and inter-assay coefficient of variation, the total number of patients included in the study, the total number of participants, mean BMI and age, gender, method of quantification and brand of the kit used for the measurement. Additionally, information about the mean UV index and altitude (as surrogates of sun exposure) of the city where the study was conducted was obtained from Weather Government Agencies of each Country.

Assessment of risk of bias

Two reviewers (FEPM & RDC) independently assessed the quality of the selected studies. In case of disagreement in the evaluation, a third researcher resolved it (JRVB or RJMP). Quality assessment of observational studies was carried out using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cross-sectional studies. Each study was judged on three dimensions: the study groups' selection, the groups' comparability, and the ascertainment of exposure. One star was given for each signaling question among each dimension. The total number of possible stars were nine, and studies with six or more stars were considered high-quality, while studies with less than six were considered low-quality (24).

Data analysis

Before analysis, all osteocalcin values were converted to the same unit of measurement. Then extracted quantitative data were pooled in the metanalysis. For data analysis, the recommendations of Cochrane Handbook were followed as described: ucOC and tOC were compared between T1D or T2D and healthy controls. The effect size was expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) by random-effects model (REM) weighted by the inverse of the variance since all studies used randomly sampled (25). Results are presented using forest plots of SMDs and Pearson correlations for the main groups (T1D or T2D and controls). Inter-study variability was assessed using the τ², Cochran's Q, and I² statistics (26). The contribution of individual study heterogeneity was visually assessed by Baujat plots (25).

Additionally, the effect size was determined for correlations (Pearson or Spearman) of tOC, ucOC, or cOC with fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HabA1c, HDL-c, LDL-c, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), height, weight, and age.

Since enough information was available only for tOC, univariate and multiple meta-regressions were performed to add another approach for unexplained heterogeneity and to determine which variables influenced tOC serum levels. The following covariates individually or combined were used: patient age, altitude, UV index, HbA1c, and method for tOC quantification. I² and R² values were reported to present residual heterogeneity and the amount of heterogeneity explained by each variable or by the multiple meta-regression model. Residual analysis was performed to test the validity of the multiple meta-regression model.

Publication bias was visually assessed by contour-enhanced funnel plots and quantified by Egger method. Moreover, a cumulative analysis was performed and presented as a forest plot to assess an “small study effect” defined as the chance of finding a trend towards a larger effect due to the higher probability of a small study of being published when a more “significant” result is found (27, 28). Statistical analysis was conducted using R studio v1.1.463 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) [package “meta v4.2”].

Results

Study selection and study characteristics

A total of 557 studies were identified by database searching, and 45 were eligible for full-text review. After review, 20 studies were retained for the systematic review and 17 for meta-analysis. Specific reasons for excluding 25 full-text studies are presented in Supplementary S1B, including no existence of a control group, the inclusion of adults and children (mixed population) in the same analysis, or with diabetic ketoacidosis. Furthermore, studies with no observational design or failure to report osteocalcin serum levels were excluded (Figure 1). Some authors were reached by email to obtain missed data about their article, but no answer was achieved. The general characteristics of the included articles are described in Table 1 (10, 11, 15–17, 29–45).

Figure 1

The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used for the quality assessment of observational studies. All studies were considered as high quality (had 6 or more points) (10, 11, 15–17, 30–35, 38, 39, 41–44) (Table 2).

From the 20 included studies, a total of 3,000 pediatric patients underwent tOC, cOC, or ucOC assessment, including 983 with T1D, 30 with T2D, and 1987 healthy individuals. A total of 14 studies were performed in T1D (10, 15, 16, 30, 32, 34, 35, 39–45), two in T2D (11, 45), two in prediabetes, and three in HS. The mean patient age at inclusion was 10.6 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1 : 0.9. The methods used for osteocalcin measurement were EIA in 5 studies (30, 35, 38, 45, 46), RIA in 4 studies (36, 37, 40, 41), ELISA in 6 studies (11, 29, 31, 43), ECLIA in 4 studies (16, 34, 42) and in one study the technique for quantification of osteocalcin was not reported. The intra-and interassay coefficients of variation were from 1.1% to 10.8%.

Comparisons of total OC between T1D and HS

A total 14 studies compared the total OC serum concentrations among T1D and HS (15–17, 30, 33–35, 39–43, 47). There was lower SMD for serum levels of total OC in T1D than in HS (SMD: −2.2, CI 95%: −3.75 to −0.66). A Q value of 706.39 with 13 degrees of freedom and p < 0.001 provides evidence that the effect size varies across studies, and I² indicates that 98.0% of the variation can be attributed to a true effect rather than a random error (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Baujat plot showed that the studies from Faienza influenced the most to the overall results, whereas Huneif contributed the most to the overall heterogeneity (Figure 3) (15–17, 30, 35, 39, 41). The funnel plot suggested publication bias (Supplementary S2). The cumulative analysis showed no “small-study effect” on effect size (Supplementary S3).

Figure 3

Comparison of ucOC in abnormal glycemic status vs. HS

In total, three studies compared the ucOC serum levels among individuals with abnormal glycemic status (AGS= T2D or prediabetes) and normal glycemic status. There was lower SMD for serum levels of ucOC in AGS than in HS (−1.34, CI95%: −2.42 to −0.25). A Q value of 51.95 with 2 degrees of freedom and p < 0.001 provides evidence that the effect size varies across studies, and I² indicates that 96% of the variation can be attributed to a true effect rather than a random error (Figure 4) (11, 36, 37).

Figure 4

Comparison of ucOC between T1D and HS

Only Huneiff measured ucOC in T1D and found lower serum levels in these patients (1.08 ± 0.56 ng/ml) than in HS (2.58 ± 0.55 ng/ml) (17).

Comparison of ucOC between T2D and HS

One study measured ucOC serum concentrations in pediatric patients with T2D, reporting lower ucOC serum levels among T2D (0.65 ± 0.46 ng/ml) than in controls (1.25 ± 0.49 ng/ml; p < 0.01) (11).

Correlation of ucOC with metabolic parameters in HS and abnormal glucose parameters

A total of two studies reported correlations of ucOC with metabolic and anthropometric parameters in HS (29, 31) and three in diabetic patients (11, 17, 45). In healthy subjects, significant positive correlations of ucOC with WC and weight were found but not with other parameters (Supplementary S4). In diabetic children, significant negative correlations of ucOC with HbA1c and glycemia were found in T1D and T2D (Figure 5).

Figure 5

Correlation of tOC with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in HS and diabetes

Two studies reported correlations of tOC with metabolic and anthropometric parameters in HS (29, 31) and two in diabetic patients (30, 44). In HS, a significant positive correlation was identified for FPG, LDL-c, WC, height, and weight (Supplementary S5A–J). Among T1D children, a significant negative correlation was also found between tOC and HbA1c, but no data regarding T2D were identified in publications (Supplementary S5K).

cOC

One report compared the serum levels of cOC between HS and T2D and found no significant differences (11). No differences in T1D or T2D. Only one study performed in healthy children found that high serum levels of cOC were related to lower HMW-adiponectin in leaner children (a hormone released by osteocalcin in animals that increases insulin sensitivity). Moreover, they found that a higher ucOC-to-cOC ratio was associated with higher HOMA-β in leaner children and related with higher HMW-adiponectin in heavier children, concluding that carboxylation of osteocalcin relates to metabolic and anthropometric parameters in a weight-dependent manner (38).

Contributors to the variability of tOC

Since variability was found to be high for tOC estimates, univariate and multivariate meta-regressions were performed to determine which variables influence the serum levels of tOC. In the individual meta-regressions, covariates significantly explaining the heterogeneity were patient age (R²= 25.53%), altitude (R²= 34.67%) and HbA1c (R²= 26.43%) (Table 3; Figure 6).

Figure 6

The multivariate meta-regression indicates that 62.8% of the total heterogeneity was explained by the covariate age, altitude, and HbA1c. In the moderator test, the estimated model was highly significant with QM (df = 4) = 41.21 and p < 0.0001. The patient age (p = 0.007), altitude (p = 0.008), and HbA1c (p = 0.012) have a significant influence on the levels of tOC serum, while the UV index was not significant (p = 0.64) (Table 4).

The estimated model indicates that every one-year increase in the patient's age corresponds to an increment of 0.7557 units in terms of the SMD, while keeping the other covariates constant. Similarly, for every unit of altitude increasing, the true effect size decreases at a rate of 0.0028. Finally, for every one-unit change in HbA1c, the SMD of levels of tOC serum decreases at a rate of 1.01.

Residual analysis was performed (see Supplementary S6), in which it can be noted that the assumptions of homoscedasticity, independence, and normality are satisfied—such analysis allowed the validation of the meta-regression model.

Discussion

Main findings

Clinical implications and physiological plausibility of the findings

Since obesity, insulin resistance, glycemic, and lipid abnormalities predispose to children and adolescents to the development of chronic diseases in adulthood such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases, it is quite important to identify serum markers related to abnormal metabolic phenotypes. Because osteocalcin was consistently related to FPG, HbA1c, LDL-c, WC, height, and weight in infants and adolescents, its routine clinical measurement as a marker children/adolescent metabolic status is plausible. Especially because ucOC has several metabolic effects discovered in preclinical studies, such as increased insulin synthesis, beta-cell proliferation, and insulin sensitivity throughout an action on the pancreas, adipose, and muscle tissue (48). Furthermore, a decrease in ucOC is related to fat accumulation in adipocytes and hepatocytes (49). In contrast, the administration of this hormone decreases the content of triglycerides at these cells (50), improves glucose metabolism, and prevents T2D in mice. Thus, a plausible biological explanation exists for our findings about the correlation of ucOC with glucometabolic and anthropometric parameters.

Strengths and limitations

Our study has several strengths. Firstly, we conducted a rigorous systematic review by independent reviewers and a third one to evaluate and assess bias. Database searching was also done by independent investigators, all blinded to authorship and the hospital where the study was conducted, allowing us to minimize bias when selecting publications for inclusion. Secondly, the standardized mean difference was used to avoid discrepancies in unit measurements along with an exhaustive assessment of heterogeneity by 10⁶ simulations, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression. In addition, multiple methods were used to measure bias in each group, from advanced techniques such as the Copas model to cumulative analysis, aiming to determine the trend toward higher effects in smaller studies. Finally, multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors were analyzed by single and multivariate meta-regression to address the influence of all these factors on the variability of tOC. It allows us to understand that tOC levels were mainly influenced by age, glycemic control, and altitude but not by latitude, BMI, insulin, or other covariates. This complete analysis is a strength because it should be considered when designing clinical research involving osteocalcin or stablishing reference values. On another way, we must mention some weaknesses, including a relatively small number of studies performed in children with T2D, the use of different methods (RIA, EIA, ELISA) to measure the serum levels of osteocalcin and the non-reporting of the inter-assay coefficients of variation for all the studies. In addition, we cannot assure that the primary studies considered all factors that modify OC serum levels such as the treatment, exercise, and the season when osteocalcin was measured.

Conclusions and implications

Osteocalcin is involved in energy metabolism in pediatric subjects because it is consistently related to FPG, HbA1c, LDL-c, and anthropometric parameters such as WC, height, and weight. Although serum levels of OC are highly variable among populations, such variability is explained by diverse intrinsic and extrinsic factors such as age, altitude, and glycated hemoglobin.

Moreover, its utility as a predictor of metabolic disease risk should be explored in the future, together with potential strategies to increase uCOC serum levels to improve metabolic status.

Condensation

This meta-analysis provides evidence that osteocalcin is related to markers of energetic metabolism among pediatric patients with normal and abnormal glycemic status.

References

• 1.

  LeeNKSowaHHinoiEFerronMAhnJDConfavreuxCet alEndocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the Skeleton. Cell. (2007) 130(3):456–69. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.047

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  Villafän-BernalJRSánchez-EnríquezSMuñoz-ValleJF. Molecular modulation of osteocalcin and its relevance in diabetes (review). Int J Mol Med. (2011) 28(3):283–93. 10.3892/ijmm.2011.706

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  Díaz-LópezABullóMJuanola-FalgaronaMMartínez-GonzálezMAEstruchRCovasMIet alReduced serum concentrations of carboxylated and undercarboxylated osteocalcin are associated with risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in a high cardiovascular risk population: a nested case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2013) 98(11):4524–31. 10.1210/jc.2013-2472

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  Villafán-BernalJRLlamas-CovarrubiasMAMuñoz-ValleJFRivera-LeónEAGonzález-HitaMEBastidas-RamírezBEet alA cut-point value of uncarboxylated to carboxylated Index is associated with glycemic Status markers in type 2 diabetes. J Invest Med. (2016) 62(1):33–6. 10.2310/JIM.0000000000000015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  Sanchez-EnriquezSBallesteros-GonzalezITVillafán-BernalJRPascoe-GonzalezSRivera-LeonEABastidas-RamirezBEet alSerum levels of undercarboxylated osteocalcin are related to cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy subjects. World J Diabetes. (2017) 8(1):11. 10.4239/wjd.v8.i1.11

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  RaznyUFedakDKiec-WilkBGoralskaJGrucaAZdzienickaAet alCarboxylated and undercarboxylated osteocalcin in metabolic complications of human obesity and prediabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. (2017) 33(3):1–26. 10.1002/dmrr.2862

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  LiuDMGuoXZTongHJTaoBSunLHZhaoHYet alAssociation between osteocalcin and glucose metabolism: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. (2015) 26(12):2823–33. 10.1007/s00198-015-3197-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  KunutsorSKApekeyTALaukkanenJA. Association of serum total osteocalcin with type 2 diabetes and intermediate metabolic phenotypes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational evidence. Eur J Epidemiol. (2015) 30(8):599–614. 10.1007/s10654-015-0058-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  Martinez-PortillaRJVillafan-BernalJRLip-SosaDLMelerEClotetJSerna-VelaFJet alOsteocalcin serum levels in gestational diabetes Mellitus and their intrinsic and extrinsic determinants: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res. (2018) 2018:4986735. 10.1155/2018/4986735

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  LoureiroMBUrurahyMAGFreire-NetoFPOliveiraGHMDuarteVMGLuchessiADet alLow bone mineral density is associated to poor glycemic control and increased OPG expression in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2014) 103(3):452–7. 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  TakayaJTanabeYKuroyanagiYKanekoK. Decreased undercarboxylated osteocalcin in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 29(8):879–84. 10.1515/jpem-2015-0417

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  WadaSKamiyaS. Bone and bone related biochemical examinations. Bone and collagen related metabolites. Osteocalcin (OC). Clin Calcium. (2006) 16(6):1017–21. PMID: .

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  TripathiTGuptaPRaiPSharmaJGuptaVKSinghN. Osteocalcin and serum insulin-like growth factor-1 as biochemical skeletal maturity indicators. Prog Orthod. (2017) 18(1):1–8. 10.1186/s40510-017-0184-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  JohansenJSGiwercmanAHartwellDNielsenCTPricePAChristiansenCet alSerum bone gla-protein as a marker of bone growth in children and adolescents: correlation with age, height, Serum insulin-like growth factor I, and Serum testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (1988) 67(2):273–8. 10.1210/jcem-67-2-273

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  KhoshhalKISheweitaSAAl-MaghamsiMSHabebAM. Does type 1 diabetes mellitus affect bone quality in prepubertal children?J Taibah Univ Med Sci. (2015) 10(3):300–5. 10.1016/j.jtumed.2015.03.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  KaragüzelGAkcurinSÖzdemS. Bone mineral density and alterations of bone metabolism in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. (2006) 19(6):805–14. 10.1515/JPEM.2006.19.6.805

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  Faris ShalayelMH. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in toddlers and schoolchildren in Najran region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Med J Aust. (2018) 10(12):981–8. 10.21767/AMJ.2017.3184

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  FerronMHinoiEKarsentyGDucyP. Osteocalcin differentially regulates β cell and adipocyte gene expression and affects the development of metabolic diseases in wild-type mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2008) 105(13):5266–70. 10.1073/pnas.0711119105

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  FerronMMcKeeMDLevineRLDucyPKarsentyG. Intermittent injections of osteocalcin improve glucose metabolism and prevent type 2 diabetes in mice. Bone. (2012) 50(2):568–75. 10.1016/j.bone.2011.04.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  StroupDFBerlinJAMortonSCOlkinIWilliamsonGDRennieDet alMeta-analysis of Observational Studies. JAMA. (2000) 283(15):2008–12. 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDGAltmanDAntesGet alPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Chin J Integr Med. (2009) 7(9):889–96. 10.3736/jcim20090918

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  StovoldEBeecherDFoxleeRNoel-StorrA. Study flow diagrams in cochrane systematic review updates: an adapted PRISMA flow diagram. Syst Rev. (2014) 3(54):1–5. 10.1186/2046-4053-3-54

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  HigginsJPTGreenS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011). Available atwww.handbook.cochrane.org(updated March 2011).

  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  StangA. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25(9):603–5. 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  BaujatBMahéCPignonJPHillC. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials. Stat Med. (2002) 21(18):2641–52. 10.1002/sim.1221

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  BorensteinMHigginsJPTHedgesLVRothsteinHR. Basics of meta-analysis: i2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods. (2017) 8(1):5–18. 10.1002/jrsm.1230

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  LauJSchmidCHChalmersTC. Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care. J Clin Epidemiol. (1995) 48(1):45–57. 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00106-Z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  BorensteinMHedgesLVHigginsJPTRothsteinHR. Introduction to meta-analysis part 5: complex data structures. In: Wiley Online Library, Second Edition. Introduction to meta-analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2009). p. 213–45.

  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  GiudiciKVFisbergRMMarchioniDMLPetersBSEMartiniLA. Crosstalk between bone and fat tissue: associations between vitamin D, osteocalcin, adipokines, and markers of glucose metabolism among adolescents. J Am Coll Nutr. (2017) 36(4):273–80. 10.1080/07315724.2016.1274923

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  FaienzaMFVenturaADelvecchioMFusilloAPiacenteLAcetoGet alHigh sclerostin and dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) serum levels in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2017) 102(4):1174–81. 10.1210/jc.2016-2371

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  TubicBMagnussonPMårildSLeuMSchwetzVSioenIet alDifferent osteocalcin forms, markers of metabolic syndrome and anthropometric measures in children within the IDEFICS cohort. Bone. (2016) 84:230–6. 10.1016/j.bone.2016.01.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  TsentidisCGourgiotisDKossivaLDoulgerakiAMarmarinosAGalli-TsinopoulouAet alHigher levels of s-RANKL and osteoprotegerin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus may indicate increased osteoclast signaling and predisposition to lower bone mass: a multivariate cross-sectional analysis. Osteoporos Int. (2016) 27(4):1631–43. 10.1007/s00198-015-3422-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33.

  WędrychowiczAStecMSztefkoKStarzykJB. Associations between bone, fat tissue and metabolic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. (2014) 122(8):491–5. 10.1055/s-0034-1375666

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34.

  MaggioABRRizzoliRRMarchandLMFerrariSBeghettiMFarpour-LambertNJ. Physical activity increases bone mineral density in children with type 1 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2012) 44(7):1206–11. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182496a25

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35.

  Abd El DayemSMEl-ShehabyAMAbd El GafarAFawzyASalamaH. Bone density, body composition, and markers of bone remodeling in type 1 diabetic patients. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. (2011) 71(5):387–93. 10.3109/00365513.2011.573574

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36.

  PollockNKBernardPJGowerBAGundbergCMWengerKMisraSet alLower uncarboxylated osteocalcin concentrations in children with prediabetes is associated with β-cell function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2011) 96(7):1092–9. 10.1210/jc.2010-2731

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37.

  PollockNKBernardPJWengerKMisraSGowerBAAllisonJDet alLower bone mass in prepubertal overweight children with prediabetes. J Bone Miner Res. (2010) 25(12):2484–93. 10.1002/jbmr.184

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38.

  Prats-PuigAMas-PararedaMRiera-PérezEGonzález-ForcadellDMierCMallol-GuissetMet alCarboxylation of osteocalcin affects its association with metabolic parameters in healthy children. Diabetes Care. (2010) 33(3):661–3. 10.2337/dc09-1837

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39.

  ErsoyBGökşenDDarcanSMaviEÖztürkC. Evaluation of bone mineral density in children with diabetes mellitus. Indian J Pediatr. (1999) 66(3):375–9. 10.1007/BF02845528

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40.

  LeonMLarroderaLLledoGHawkinsF. Study of bone loss in diabetes mellitus type 1. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (1989) 6(3):237–42. 10.1016/0168-8227(89)90035-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41.

  GunczlerPLanesRPaz-MartinezVMartinisREsaaSColmenaresVet alDecreased lumbar spine bone mass and low bone turnover in children and adolescents with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus followed longitudinally. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. (1998) 11(3):413–9. 10.1515/JPEM.1998.11.3.413

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42.

  MaggioABRFerrariSKraenzlinMMarchandLMSchwitzgebelVBeghettiMet alDecreased bone turnover in children and adolescents with well controlled type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 23(7):697–707. 10.1515/jpem.2010.23.7.697

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43.

  PaterASypniewskaGPileckiO. Biochemical markers of bone cell activity in children with type 1 diabetes Mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 23(1–2):81–6. 10.1515/jpem.2010.23.1-2.81

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44.

  GuarneriMPWeberGGalliaPChiumelloG. Effect of insulin treatment on osteocalcin levels in diabetic children and adolescents. J Endocrinol Invest. (1993) 16(7):505–9. 10.1007/BF03348892

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45.

  RedondoMJShirkeyBAFragaDWGaberAOSabekOM. Serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin correlates with hemoglobin A1c in children with recently diagnosed pediatric diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. (2017) 18(8):869–73. 10.1111/pedi.12501

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46.

  FaienzaMFBrunettiGSanesiLColaianniGCeliMPiacenteLet alHigh irisin levels are associated with better glycemic control and bone health in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2018) 141:10–7. 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.03.046

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47.

  HuneifMAHomadaEEHFadlelseedOEHamidHGMShalayelMHF. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in toddlers and schoolchildren in Najran region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia–correlation with osteocalcin and vitamin D. Med J Aust. (2017) 10(12):981–8. PMID: .

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 48.

  MeraPLaueKFerronMConfavreuxCWeiJGalán-DíezMet alOsteocalcin signaling in myofibers is necessary and sufficient for optimum adaptation to exercise. Cell Metab. (2016) 23(6):1078–92. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49.

  Diaz-FrancoMCFranco-Diaz de LeonRVillafan-BernalJR. Osteocalcin-GPRC6A: an update of its clinical and biological multi-organic interactions (review). Mol Med Rep. (2019) 19(1):15–22. 10.3892/mmr.2018.9627

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50.

  DuJZhangMLuJZhangXXiongQXuYet alOsteocalcin improves nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice through activation of Nrf2 and inhibition of JNK. Endocrine. (2016) 53(3):701–9. 10.1007/s12020-016-0926-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar