Abstract
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between maternal periodontal disease (PD) and three main adverse neonatal outcomes, namely, preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA).
Methods:
The Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to 6 December 2020 for relevant observational studies on an association between PD and risk of PTB, LBW, and SGA. Eligibility criteria included observational studies which compared the prevalence of PTB and/or LBW and/or SGA between PD women and periodontal health controls. The exclusion criteria included incomplete data, animal research, and mixing up various pregnancy outcomes, such as “preterm low birth weight” and languages other than Chinese and English. Data were extracted and analyzed independently by two authors. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata Statistical Software, Release 12 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Odds ratio (OR), confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity (I2) were computed.
Results:
Fourteen case-control studies and 10 prospective cohort studies, involving 15,278 participants, were identified. Based on fixed effect meta-analysis, PTB showed a significant association with PD (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.39–1.77, P < 0.00001) and LBW also showed a significant association with PD (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.75–3.37, P < 0.00001) in a random effect meta-analysis. However, a random effect meta-analysis showed no relationship between PD and SGA (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.86–3.07, P = 0.136).
Conclusion:
Our findings indicate that pregnant women with PD have a significantly higher risk of PTB and LBW. However, large prospective, blinded cohort studies with standardized diagnostic criteria of PD and adequate control of confounding factors are still required to confirm the relationship between PD and adverse neonatal outcomes.
Introduction
Preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA) are the leading adverse neonatal outcomes worldwide and have significant public health implications because they are responsible for a great part of neonatal mortality and morbidity in both developed and developing countries (1–3). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), PTB is defined as a delivery that takes place before 37 weeks (<259 days) of gestation, LBW refers to birth weight of <2,500 g, and SGA refers to birth weight below the 10th percentile of birth weight for gestational age (3, 4). Convincing evidence has found the association between adverse neonatal outcomes and infections especially genitourinary infections (5, 6). However, the hypothesis that infections distant from the feto-placental unit may be associated with adverse neonatal outcomes has led to an increased awareness of the potential role of chronic bacterial infections elsewhere in the body (7).
Periodontal disease (PD) occurs in ~40% of pregnant women (8). It includes several inflammatory conditions, usually initiated by oral bacteria, starting with a reversible build-up of plaque and inflammation of gingival tissue (gingivitis), progressing to irreversible destruction of the supportive periodontal tissues of the teeth and tooth loss (periodontitis) (9). Generally, PD is clinically characterized by periodontal pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), alveolar bone loss, and gingival inflammation (measured as bleeding on probing) (10). In 1996, Offenbacher et al. conducted a case-control study (11), suggesting that maternal PD could lead to a 7-fold increase in the risk of preterm LBW (PLBW). Following this groundbreaking study, numerous studies have shown an association between periodontal inflammation and adverse neonatal outcomes, including PTB, LBW, and SGA (12, 13). However, this association has not been consistent in other studies (14–17). These inconsistencies could be explained by several factors as follows: (i) lack of a unified diagnostic standard for PD (18); (ii) the variety of definitions used for adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), such as PLBW, preterm or LBW, and preterm and/or LBW; (iii) confounding effect of the risk factors. There have been a few systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the relationship between PD and adverse neonatal outcomes so far (19, 20). However, the heterogeneity of the previous studies still needs further exploration of confounding factors and more detailed subgroup analysis, and due to the publication of new data, it is necessary to perform a meta-analysis which can improve the evidence on the association between PD and adverse neonatal outcomes.
Given the alarming global disease burden of PD and adverse neonatal outcomes, there is an urgent need to clarify the substantial role of PD in the etiology of adverse neonatal outcomes (21), which will provide evidence for the periodontal prevention and intervention among children-bearing women, thus reducing the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes caused by PD. Therefore, the objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the association between PD and adverse neonatal outcomes and provide suggestions for preventive medicine and public health.
Materials and Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis were executed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement (PRISMA) (22). An a priori protocol was written and followed. The Population/Income/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) question was set up as follows: Whether there was a higher risk of preterm birth and/or LBW and/or SGA in the population of pregnant women with periodontal disease compared with the population of periodontal health pregnant women.
Information Sources and Search Strategy
The comprehensive database searches were performed by W. F. from inception to December 2020 in the following electronic sources: Ovid Medline 1946, Web of Science 1900, Embase 1947, and Cochrane Library. The following terms were used in the automatic search: “periodontal disease AND preterm delivery,” “periodontitis AND preterm delivery,” “periodontal disease AND low birth weight,” “periodontitis AND low birth weight,” “periodontal disease AND small for gestational age,” and “periodontitis AND small for gestational age.” The detailed search strategy can be found in Supplementary Table 1. A manual search of reference lists of relevant articles was also conducted. All the searched literature was exported to the reference manager software (ENDNOTE®X9, Bld 7212, Thomson Reuters), where the duplicated articles were removed. Manual checks and assessments were also performed to determine whether abstracts were unique or copies.
Study Selection and Eligibility Criteria
Two independent reviewers Y. Z. and L. C. performed the selection of articles. The first screening was carried out by reading the title and the abstract, eliminating those studies that did not meet the predetermined eligibility criteria. Subsequently, intensive reading of the full text of the remaining articles was made, finally selecting those eligible articles. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) observational studies, including case-control studies and prospective cohort studies; (2) compared the prevalence of PTB and/or LBW and/or SGA between PD women and periodontal health controls; (3) dichotomous data were reported or sufficient data were available to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI); and (4) when overlapped studies appeared, choose the latest and most complete one. The exclusion criteria included the following: (1) incomplete data: unclear or inappropriate definition of cases, unadjusted confounders, and unavailable data; (2) animal research; (3) PTB or LBW or SGA were not used as independent observational outcomes separately, such as PLBW, preterm or LBW, and preterm and/or LBW; and (4) languages other than Chinese and English.
Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
The full text of eligible studies was independently reviewed by Y. Z. and L. C. Meta-analysis was performed to determine whether maternal PD had an adverse effect on PTB, LBW, and SGA separately. Data extraction was also independently performed by the two reviewers. Extracted information of all eligible studies included title, author names, year of publication, country, study design, sample size, age (average and/or range), timing of measurements, definitions of cases, primary outcomes (prevalence of PTB/LBW/SGA expressed by the number of cases, calculated OR and its 95% CI), and adjusted confounders.
The methodological quality of eligible studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) (23), a standardized tool recommended by the Cochrane Working Group to assess the risk of bias in observational studies. Criteria for qualitative assessment comprised three main items, namely, (1) selection of sample, (2) comparability, and (3) exposure. Each item had questions with options and could receive one or two points if the criterion was achieved. Studies were graded into low quality (0–6 points) and high quality (7–9 points) by two independent reviewers (Y. Z. and L. C.). The reviewers resolved discrepancies by discussion and additional comments from a non-author investigator.
Data Synthesis and Analysis
All analyses were performed using Stata (version 12, StataCorp, College Station, TX), as the P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Q test and I2 test were used to assess the heterogeneity across studies (24). The hazard ratio was considered equivalent to OR, and to estimate pregnancy outcomes in women with PD vs. periodontal healthy controls, a fixed or random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled OR. Subgroup analysis was performed to find whether particular characteristics of studies (clinical or methodological) were associated to the value of the overall OR. Publication bias was assessed graphically and statistically via the Egger's linear regression test at P < 0.10 (25). Finally, with the metaninf algorithm in Stata, sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding one study at each turn.
Results
Study Selection and Characteristics
Search results are presented in the flowchart (Figure 1). A total of 5,646 articles were yielded in the electronic search, and 13 articles were searched from reference lists of relevant articles, reviews, and dissertations. After title and abstract screening, 116 articles underwent full-text assessment. Subsequently, 44 studies were excluded as a result of incomplete data, 28 were excluded for mixed outcomes, 2 were excluded for animal research, 4 studies were excluded for duplicated publication, and 14 studies were excluded for other languages. Finally, 24 observational studies were included in this meta-analysis (26–49).
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study selection process for the present meta-analysis.
The 24 eligible studies contained 10 prospective cohort studies and 14 case-control studies, including 15,278 pregnant women. The included studies were all women of childbearing age, almost all women were older than 18. All the studies compared the prevalence of APOs between PD women and periodontally healthy controls. Among them, 15 studies investigated PTB, 14 studies investigated LBW, and 4 studies investigated SGA. Definitions of PTB, LBW, and SGA were in accordance with the WHO standard. However, definitions of PD mainly came from previous epidemiological studies and were inconsistent, including definition from Lopez et al. (≥4 teeth with ≥1 site with PPD ≥4 mm and CAL ≥3 mm at the same site), definition from Offenbacher et al. (PD ≥3 mm or CAL ≥2 mm), definition from American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) (CDC-APP, ≥ 2 interproximal sites with CAL ≥4 mm), and other. Characteristics of all studies are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1
| Study | Country | Design | Match | Blind | No. of Participants | Age | Examination time | Definition of periodontal disease | Outcomes | OR (95% CI) | Conclusion | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | PD | Control | PD | Control | ||||||||||
| Agueda et al. (26) | Spain | Prospective cohort | / | / | 1,296 | 338 | 958 | 18–40b | About 20 weeks gestation | ≥4 teeth with ≥1 site with PPD ≥4 mm and CAL ≥3 mm at the same site (Lopez) | PTB LBW | 1.77 (1.08–2.88)† / | No relationship was found between PTB, LBW and mother's PD | |
| Baskaradoss et al. (27) | India | Case-control | No | NA | 300 | 54 | 246 | 25.51 ± 3.01a | Within 48 h after delivery | ≥4 teeth with ≥1 site with PPD ≥4 mm and CAL ≥3 mm at the same site (Lopez) | PTB | 2.72 (1.68–6.84)† | Periodontal disease is a possible risk factor for PTB in this population | |
| Bassini et al. (28) | Brazil | Case-control | Yes | No | 915 | 511 | 404 | NA | After delivery | ≥3 sites, in different teeth, with CAL ≥3 mm | LBW | 0.93 (0.63–1.41)† | Theres's no statistically significant association between PD and LBW | |
| Boggess et al. (29) | USA | Prospective cohort | / | / | 1,017 | 733 | 284 | ≥18b | 1st or 2nd prenatal visit | ≥1 tooth sites with PPD >4 mm or ≥1 tooth PPD >3 mm with BOP (WHO) | SGA | Mild: 1.3 (0.7–2.5)† > Mild: 2.3 (1.1–4.5) | PD early in pregnancy is associated with delivery of a SGA infant | |
| Cruz et al. (30) | Brazil | Case-control | No | Yes | 302 | 137 | 165 | NA | Within 7 days after delivery | ≥4 teeth with ≥1 site with PPD ≥4 mm and CAL ≥3 mm at the same site (Lopez) | LBW | 2.15 (1.32–3.48)* | PD is a possible risk factor for LBW | |
| Erchick et al. (31) | Nepal | Prospective cohort | / | / | 1,394 | 554 | 840 | 23.0 ± 4.6a | <26 weeks of GA | BOP ≥10% and/or PD ≥4 mm | PTB | NA | GS in women examined early in pregnancy were risk factors for PTB | |
| Filho et al. (32) | Brazil | Case-control | No | Yes | 372 | 72 | 300 | 23.86 ± 6.6a | Within 7 days after delivery | ≥4 teeth with ≥1 site with PD ≥4 mm, CAL ≥3 mm, and BOP at the same site | LBW | 6.02 (2.47–15.17)† | PS associated with LBW | |
| Jacob et al. (33) | India | Case-control | Yes | Yes | 340 | 137 | 203 | 18–35b | Within 48 h after delivery | ≥1 site PPD ≥4 mm (WHO) | LBW | 2.85 (1.62–5.50)† | PS is a significant risk factor for LBW | |
| Khan et al. (34) | Pakistan | Case-control | Yes | NR | 160 | 71 | 89 | 18–35b | Within 48 h after delivery | ≥1 site PPD ≥4 mm (WHO) | LBW | 3.17 (1.43–7.05)† | PS is a significant risk factor for LBW | |
| Kumar et al. (35) | India | Prospective cohort | / | / | 340 | 208 | 132 | 18–35b | 18–31b | 14–20 weeks of gestation | CAL and PPD ≥4 mm in ≥1 sites | PTB LBW SGA | 1.49 (0.71–3.14)† 1.90 (1.25–3.79)† 1.45 (0.51–4.14) | PS (but not GS) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes |
| Macedo et al. (36) | Brazil | Case-control | Yes | No | 296 | 46 | 250 | 18–40b | Within 48 h after delivery | ≥4 teeth with ≥1 sites with PPD ≥4 mm and CAL ≥3 mm at the same site (Lopez) | PTB | 1.62 (0.80–3.29)† | PD is not associated with PTB | |
| Mathew et al. (37) | India | Case-control | Yes | Yes | 160 | 11 | 149 | 18–35b | NA | ≥1 site PPD ≥4 mm and CAL ≥2 mm | LBW | 4.94 (1.03–23.65)* | PD is associated with LBW | |
| Micu et al. (38) | Romania | Case-control | No | Yes | 194 | 38 | 156 | 29.1 ± 5.7a | Within 72 h after delivery | ≥4 teeth with ≥1 sites with PPD ≥4 mm and CAL ≥3 mm at the same site (Lopez) | PTB | 2.26 (1.06- 4.82)† | PD and its severity might, in part, be considered as contributor to PTB | |
| Moore et al. (39) | UK | Prospective cohort | / | / | 546 | 269 | 277 | 32.0 ± 5.1a | 28.6 ± 5.8a | NA | >5 sites with PPD ≥5 mm > 3 sites CAL ≥3 mm | PTB LBW | NA NA | PD is not associated with PTB or LBW in this population |
| Nabet et al. (40) | France | Case-control | No | Yes | 1,955 | 266 | 1,689 | >18b | 2–4 days after delivery | ≥4 teeth with ≥1 sites with PPD ≥4 mm and CAL ≥ 3 mm at the same site (Lopez) | PTB | 1.12 (0.85–1.48)† | PS is associated with an increased risk of PTB | |
| Novak et al. (41) | Hungary | Case-control | No | Yes | 242 | 77 | 165 | NA | Within 72 h after delivery | PD ≥4 mm at least at one site and BOP ≥50% of the teeth | PTB LBW | 1.95 (1.01–3.74)† 2.58 (1.29–5.16) | PS might be a triggering factor and can be associated with PTB and LBW | |
| Offenbacher et al. (42) | USA | Prospective cohort | / | Yes | 1,020 | 735 | 285 | 28.2 ± 6.6a | 1st or 2nd prenatal visit | PD ≥3 or CAL ≥2 | PTB | 1.2 (0.9–1.7)† | PD increases relative risk for PTB | |
| Pitiphat et al. (43) | USA | Prospective cohort | / | / | 1,635 | 62 | 1,573 | 35.2 ± 3.9a | 35.2 ± 3.9a | 2nd trimester of pregnancy | Radiography: ≥1 site with bone loss of ≥3 mm | PTB SGA | 1.74 (0.65–4.66)† 2.11 (0.76–5.86) | PS is an independent risk factor for poor pregnancy outcome among middle-class women |
| Ryu et al. (44) | Korea | Case-control | Yes | Yes | 172 | 61 | 111 | 19–43b | 2–5 days after delivery | ≥2 teeth CAL >3.5 mm (CDC-APP) | PTB | 1.50 (0.74–3.03)† | PD showed no association with PTB | |
| Saddki et al. (45) | Malaysia | Prospective cohort | / | / | 472 | 232 | 240 | NA | 2nd trimester of pregnancy | ≥4 sites with PPD ≥4 mm, and CAL ≥3 mm at the same site, with BOP | LBW | 3.84 (1.34–11.05)† | PS increases risk of LBW | |
| Souza et al. (46) | Brazil | Case-control | No | Yes | 951 | 163 | 788 | NA | NA | ≥4 sites with PPD ≥4 mm, and CAL ≥3 mm at the same site, with BOP | LBW | 1.00 (0.61–1.68)† | PD is not associated with LBW | |
| Tejada et al. (47) | Switzerland | Case-control | Yes | Yes | 429 | 125 | 304 | ≥18b | Within 24–72 h after delivery | ≥ 2 interproximal sites with CAL ≥4 mm, not on the same tooth (CDC-APP) | PTB | 2.38 (1.36–4.14)† | PTB is associated with PS | |
| Turton et al. (48) | South Africa | Prospective cohort | / | / | 443 | 320 | 123 | 24.13 ± 5.30a | NA | PD ≥3 mm or CAL ≥2 mm (Offenbacher) | PTB LBW | NA NA | PD is a risk indicator for adverse pregnancy outcomes | |
| Vogt et al. (49) | Brazil | Prospective cohort | / | / | 327 | 156 | 171 | 18–42b | Before 32 weeks of gestation | ≥4 teeth showing ≥1 site with 4 mm of PPD and CAL at the same site, with BOP | PTB LBW SGA | 3.47 (1.62–7.43)† 2.93 (1.36–6.34)† 2.38 (0.93–6.10)* | PD was a risk factor for PTB, LBW among Brazilian low risk pregnant women. | |
Characters of included studies.
PTB, preterm birth; LBW, low birth weight; SGA, small for gestational age; PD, periodontal disease; PS, periodontitis; GS, gingivitis; NA, not available.
aData as mean ± SD.
bData as range.
†Adjusted odds ratio.
*Crude odds ratio.
Methodological Quality
Results of quality assessment of the included studies using NOS for observational studies are presented in Table 2. All the included studies scored at least one star in each of the three categories: the selection and comparability of the study groups and confirmation of the outcome of interest. Overall, 10 studies were graded as high quality, and 14 studies were recognized as low quality due to an NOS score of <7. Management of possible confounders of each study is presented in Supplementary Table 2. Notably, 7 studies recruited subjects matching for confounders such as age and birth order. In 11 studies, the history of periodontal treatment was excluded before recruitment. As an important confounder of adverse neonatal outcomes, age was adjusted in 13 studies. As another important confounder, genitourinary tract infection (GTI) was adjusted in 7 studies. Management of other factors such as parity, smoking, and drug abuse in each study is recorded in Supplementary Table 2.
Table 2
| Author | Selection | Comparabilitya | Exposure/ outcome | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agueda et al. (26) | **** | * | *** | 8 |
| Baskaradoss et al. (27) | ** | ** | ** | 6 |
| Bassani et al. (28) | ** | ** | ** | 6 |
| Boggess et al. (29) | *** | * | *** | 7 |
| Cruz et al. (30) | ** | * | ** | 5 |
| Erchick et al. (31) | *** | * | ** | 6 |
| Gomes-Filho et al. (32) | ** | * | ** | 5 |
| Jacob and Nath (33) | ** | * | ** | 6 |
| Khan et al. (34) | *** | * | *** | 7 |
| Kumar et al. (35) | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Macedo et al. (36) | ** | ** | ** | 6 |
| Mathew et al. (37) | ** | ** | ** | 6 |
| Micu et al. (38) | *** | ** | ** | 7 |
| Moore et al. (30) | *** | * | ** | 6 |
| Nabet et al. (40) | ** | ** | ** | 6 |
| Novák et al. (41) | *** | * | *** | 7 |
| Offenbacher et al. (42) | *** | ** | *** | 8 |
| Pitiphat et al. (43) | ** | ** | ** | 6 |
| Ryu et al. (44) | *** | * | ** | 6 |
| Saddki et al. (45) | **** | * | *** | 8 |
| Souza et al. (46) | *** | ** | ** | 7 |
| Tejada et al. (47) | ** | ** | ** | 6 |
| Turton et al. (48) | **** | * | ** | 7 |
| Vogt et al. (49) | ** | ** | ** | 6 |
Assessment of risk of bias based on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.
aExcept for comparability which can be awarded a maximum of two stars, other items were given a maximum of one star for each stud. *Score of corresponding questions.
Comparison in APOs
According to the meta-analysis presented in Figure 2, increased risk of PTB (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.39–1.77, P < 0.00001, Ph = 0.364; I2 = 7.9%) was found in women with PD. Subgroups with increased risks of PTB are listed in Figure 3. In subgroup analyses by region, women with PD in Africa have a higher risk of PTB compared with other regions, and the pooled OR appears significant (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.47–4.00), while Asian women with PD show a relatively lower risk (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.04–1.64). Subgroup analysis showed that different criteria of PD show a significantly different risk of PTB, using criteria operated by Offenbacher, the OR of PTB increased to 2.22 (95% CI: 1.62–3.04); however, Lopez's criteria showed a relatively conservative risk (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.24–1.83).
Figure 2
Forest plot of preterm birth events.
Figure 3
Subgroup analyses for preterm birth.
Meta-analysis of LBW is shown in Figure 4. Women with PD also shows increased risk of LBW compared with periodontal healthy women (OR: 2.43, 95% CI 1.75–3.37, P < 0.00001, Ph = 0.000; I2 = 82.1%). Figure 5 shows subgroup analyses for LBW. When it comes to LBW, Asia women with PD have the highest risk of LBW (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 2.10–4.47). Different criteria of PD also show different risks of LBW. Offenbacher's criteria present the highest risk of LBW (OR: 14.74, 95% CI: 5.30–41.00). When the subgroup is divided by whether or not age is adjusted, studies with unadjusted age pooled higher OR (2.99, 95% CI: 1.80–4.95) compared with studies with adjusted age (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.24–2.97). The same result is found according to GTI, with unadjusted studies pooled OR significantly higher than adjusted studies (OR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.36–6.09 to OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.52–3.02).
Figure 4
Forest plot of low birth weight (LBW) events.
Figure 5
Subgroup analyses for LBW.
However, OR was 1.62 (95% CI: 0.86–3.07, P = 0.136, Ph = 0.07, I2 = 57.5%) for SGA presented in Figure 6 and illustrate no significant association between PD and SGA. The detailed results stratified by study characteristics are presented in Supplementary Tables 3–6.
Figure 6
Forest plot of small for gestational age events.
Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias
Sensitivity analyses and publication bias of each outcome are shown in Supplementary Table 7. The sensitivity analysis reveals an influence on the pooled OR and 95% CI of SGA when Kumar's study was omitted (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.37–3.69), while PTB and LBW show less influence. Publication bias was detected by Egger's linear regression test in each outcome, and only SGA shows no publication bias.
Discussion
Our meta-analysis showed that pregnant women with PD had a 1.57-fold higher risk of occurring PTB and 2.43-fold higher risk of delivering LBW infants than pregnant women with a healthy periodontium. Maternal PD is an important risk factor of PTB and LBW. Moreover, women from different regions faced different risks, owing to different genetic backgrounds, dietary habits, oral hygiene habits, and preventive healthcare policies among regions. In addition, we also found that studies without adjustment of underlying confounders such as age and UTI will magnify the effect of PD on adverse neonatal outcomes.
There were numerous studies reminding vaginal infection as an important factor in adverse neonatal outcomes (50, 51). However, some studies pointed out that low-level persistent inflammation rather than infection may trigger PTB too (7, 52). Maternal PD was a chronic exposure to oral Gram-negative pathogens, which was a preventable and treatable risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes. In women with PD, periodontal pathogens gained access to the blood circulation, and they could reside in the placenta and, worst of all, penetrate the placental barrier into the amniotic fluid and fetal circulation. Through the examination of the placental samples from women with PTB, studies had identified several microorganisms which were associated with PD, such as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Prevotella intermedia, while these microorganisms were absent from placenta from women without periodontal infection (53, 54). The presence of these substances in the fetal-placental section could stimulate the fetal immune and inflammatory response, accompanied by the production of IgM antibodies and the increased secretion of inflammatory mediators, which in turn may cause PTB (55, 56). In this case, LBW was a result of PTB. Moreover, chronic inflammation may cause structural changes in the placenta, leading to insufficient fetal nutrient support and also resulting in LBW (57, 58).
Another explanation was that in these women, PD elevated the local and systemic level of inflammatory cytokines, promoting trophoblasts and chorioamnionic cells to secret interleukins (e.g., IL-1), prostaglandins (e.g., PGE2), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (59, 60). IL-1 and TNF-α acted as initial proinflammatory mediators and directly enhanced PGE2 production by inducing cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression both in the amnion and the decidua. Meanwhile, the production of MMPs in the amnion chorion, decidua, and cervix would also be enhanced, which would degrade the extracellular matrix of the fetal membranes and cervix (58, 61). The above process contributes to adverse neonatal outcomes.
This study was based on a larger and updated database, with more observed outcomes and detailed subgroup analysis compared with a previous similar study (62–64). The previous meta-analysis on PD and pregnancy outcomes showed high heterogeneity (65, 66), and the effect of various PD criteria and management of confounders may explain this high degree of heterogeneity. Our study distributes the studies into several subgroups according to different criteria, explaining the source of heterogeneity in LBW to some extent. In addition, subgroup analyses of whether adjusted GTI can eliminate the heterogeneity in SGA (Supplementary Table 7) illustrated the importance of management of confounders in future studies. The limitation should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. Egger's test revealed an apparent bias that suggested the presence of a potential publication bias, inflated estimates by a flawed methodological design in smaller studies, and/or a lack of publication of small studies with opposite results. In addition, since only PD was studied, it is unknown whether other oral diseases such as an ulcer or dental caries also had adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes. Finally, the treatment and intervention of the subjects during pregnancy had not been recorded in most literature, which makes it impossible to analyze the impact of pregnancy intervention on adverse neonatal outcomes.
Our study has potential implications for current clinical practice. Since periodontal status is a modifiable risk factor of adverse neonatal outcomes, we suggested that either obstetricians or dentists should raise their awareness of the periodontal condition in children-bearing women, and these patients should be educated to take special care of their periodontal health, provided with antenatal dental checkups and actively treated once they have signs of periodontal infection. These will reduce the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnant women to some extent. American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) recommends bringing PD control into preconception programs and treating the disease during pregnancy, although many pregnant women are worried about the adverse effects of treatment during pregnancy, periodontal treatment is not a risk for pregnancy, and the benefits outweigh the risks of ignorance (67). Large randomized controlled trials that control the therapeutic measures need to be investigated.
In conclusion, PD was suggested as a risk factor for PTB and LBW, with a severer adverse effect in Africa and Asia separately. Therefore, improving oral health should be emphasized in children-bearing women, for the purpose of reducing the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes. It is necessary to add oral examination into the pre-pregnancy evaluation. If PD was diagnosed, a previous treatment was suggested to avoid its adverse effect on obstetric outcomes.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1004301), Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program (2018YFJH0504), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2020MH065), and Taishan Scholars Program for Young Experts of Shandong Province, and China Health Promotion Foundation (association between ovarian response and embryo quality in women with normal ovarian reserve undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standard long protocol: a retrospective cohort study; association between the numbers of retrieved oocytes and pregnancy outcomes in women with normal ovarian reserve undergoing in vitro fertilization: a retrospective cohort study). Funders did not have any role in study design, data collection, and data analyses.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
YZ performed study selection, full-text review, and drafted the manuscript. WF performed database searches. JL helped with data analyses and provided useful comments on outcome assessment. LC performed study selection, full-text review, and the revision of the manuscript. Z-JC contributed to the study concept and design. All authors contributed to this study and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the authors whose studies were included in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.799740/full#supplementary-material
- PD
periodontal disease
- PTB
preterm birth
- LBW
low birth weight
- SGA
small for gestational age
- OR
odds ratio
- CIs
confidence intervals
- I2
heterogeneity
- GTI
genitourinary tract infection
- PGE2
prostaglandins
- TNF-α
tumor necrosis factor-α
- MMPs
matrix metalloproteinases
- COX-2
cyclooxygenase-2.
Abbreviations
References
1.
World Health Organization. (1975). Pregnancy and Abortion in Adolescence. Report of a WHO Meeting. Geneva: World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. p. 1–27.
2.
GoldenbergRLRouseDJ. Prevention of premature birth. N Engl J Med. (1998) 339:313–20. 10.1056/NEJM199807303390506
3.
World Health O World B United Nations Population F United Nations Children's Fund. Maternal Mortality in 2005: Estimates Developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, and The World Bank (2007).
4.
World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems.Geneva: World Health Organization. (2015).
5.
JeffersonKK. The bacterial etiology of preterm birth. Adv Appl Microbiol. (2012) 80:1–22. 10.1016/b978-0-12-394381-1.00001-5
6.
MysorekarIUCaoB. Microbiome in parturition and preterm birth. Semin Reprod Med. (2014) 32:50–5. 10.1055/s-0033-1361830
7.
GibbsRSRomeroRHillierSLEschenbachDASweetRL. A review of premature birth and subclinical infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (1992) 166:1515–28. 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91628-n
8.
LieffSBoggessKAMurthaAPJaredHMadianosPNMossKet al. The oral conditions and pregnancy study: periodontal status of a cohort of pregnant women. J Periodontol. (2004) 75:116–26. 10.1902/jop.2004.75.1.116
9.
Brown LJ Lolnditions Lolnditions and pregnancy study: periodontal status of a cohort of pregnant Periodontol 2000. (1993) 2:57–71. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00220.x
10.
PageRCEkePI. Case Definitions for Use in Population-Based Surveillance of Periodontitis. J Periodontol. (2007) 78(Suppl. 7S):1387–99. 10.1902/jop.2007.060264
11.
OffenbacherSKatzVFertikGCollinsJBoydDMaynorGet al. Periodontal infection as a possible risk factor for preterm low birth weight. J Periodontol. (1996) 67(10 Suppl.):1103–13. 10.1902/jop.1996.67.10s.1103
12.
Guimar.dontol infection as a possible risk factor for preterm low birth weight. riodontitis. linical infection. /fped.2022.799740/full#suppleJ Clin Periodontol. (2012) 39:1024–31. 10.1111/jcpe.12000
13.
Reza KarimiMHamissiJHNaeiniSRKarimiM. The relationship between maternal periodontal status of and preterm and low birth weight infants in Iran: a case control study. Glob J Health Sci. (2015) 8:184–8. 10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p184
14.
SrinivasSKSammelMDStamilioDMClothierBJeffcoatMKParrySet al. Periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: is there an association?Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2009) 200:497.e491–8. 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.003
15.
Martínez-MartínezREMoreno-CastilloDFLoyola-RodríguezJPSánchez-MedranoAGMiguel-HernándezJHOlvera-DelgadoJHet al. Association between periodontitis, periodontopathogens and preterm birth: is it real?Arch Gynecol Obstet. (2016) 294:47ecol Obsteten1007/s00404-015-3945-1
16.
FogacciMFCardosoEOCBarbiratoDSde CarvalhoDPSansoneC. No association between periodontitis and preterm low birth weight: a caselementary-materiArch Gynecol Obstet. (2018) 297:71–6. 10.1007/s00404-017-4556-9
17.
KrügerMSDMCasarinRPPintoGDSPappenFGCamargoMBJCorreaFOBet al. Maternal periodontal disease and adverse perinatal outcomes: is there an association? A hospital-based case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2019) 32:3401–7. 10.1080/14767058.2018.1464554
18.
IdeMPapapanouPN. Epidemiology of association between maternal periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes–systematic review. J Periodontol. (2013) 84(4 Suppl.):S181–94. 10.1902/jop.2013.134009
19.
Manrique-CorredorEJOrozco-BeltranDLopez-PinedaAQuesadaJAGil-GuillenVFCarratala-MunueraC. Maternal periodontitis and preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. (2019) 47:243–51. 10.1111/cdoe.12450
20.
SavageAEatonKAMolesDRNeedlemanI. A systematic review of definitions of periodontitis and methods that have been used to identify this disease. J Clin Periodontol. (2009) 36:458–67. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01408.x
21.
BernabeEMarcenesWHernandezCRBaileyJAbreuLGAlipourVet al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in burden of oral conditions from 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease 2017 study. J Dent Res. (2020) 99:362es a 10.1177/0022034520908533
22.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPMBoutronIHoffmannTCMulrowCDet al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71
23.
WellsGSheaBO'ConnellDPetersonJWelchVLososM. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. (2009). Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed July 15, 2021).
24.
HigginsJPThompsonSG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. (2002) 21:1539–58. 10.1002/sim.1186
25.
EggerMDavey SmithGSchneiderMMinderC. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. (1997) 315:629–34. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
26.
AguedaARamy SmithGSchneiderMMinderC. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. that have been used to identify this disease. J Clin Periodontol. (2008) 35:16–22. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01166.x
27.
BaskaradossJKGeevargheseAKuttyVR. Maternal periodontal status and preterm delivery: a hospital based case-control study. J Periodontal Res. (2011) 46:542–9. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01371.x
28.
BassaniDGOlintoMTAKreigerN. Periodontal disease and perinatal outcomes: a case-control study. J Clin Periodontol. (2007) 34:31–9. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01012.x
29.
BoggessKABeckJDMurthaAPMossKOffenbacherS. Maternal periodontal disease in early pregnancy and risk for a small-for-gestational-age infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2006) 194:1316–22. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.059
30.
CruzSSCostaMDNGomesISViannaMIPSantosCT. Maternal periodontal disease as a factor associated with low birth weight. Rev Saude Publica. (2005) 39:782–7. 10.1590/s0034-89102005000500013
31.
ErchickDJKhatrySKAgrawalNKKatzJLeClerqSCRaiBet al. Risk of preterm birth associated with maternal gingival inflammation and oral hygiene behaviours in rural Nepal: a community-based, prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. (2020) 10:e036515. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036515
32.
Gomes-FilhoISPereiraECCruzSSAdanLFFViannaMIPPassos-SoaresJSet al. Relationship among mothers' glycemic level, periodontitis, and birth weight. J Periodontol. (2016) 87:238–47. 10.1902/jop.2015.150423
33.
JacobPSNathS. Periodontitis among poor rural Indian mothers increases the risk of low birth weight babies: a hospital-based case control study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. (2014) 44:85–93. 10.5051/jpis.2014.44.2.85
34.
KhanNSAshrafRNNoorSMahmood urRMashhadiSFRashidZet al. Association of maternal periodontitis with low birth weight in newborns in a tertiary care hospital J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. (2016) 28:120–5.
35.
KumarABasraMBegumNRaniVPrasadSLambaAKet al. Association of maternal periodontal health with adverse pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. (2013) 39:40–5. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01957.x
36.
MacedoJFRibeiroRAMachadoFCAssisNMSPAlvesRTOliveiraASet al. Periodontal disease and oral health-related behavior as factors associated with preterm birth: a case-control study in south-eastern Brazil. J Periodontal Res. (2014) 49:458–64. 10.1111/jre.12124
37.
MathewRJBoseAPrasadJHMuliyilJPSinghD. Maternal periodontal disease as a significant risk factor for low birth weight in pregnant women attending a secondary care hospital in South India: a case-control study. Indian J Dent Res. (2014) 25:742–7. 10.4103/0970-9290.152184
38.
MicuICRomanATicalaFSoancaACiureaAObjeleanAet al. Relationship between preterm birth and post-partum periodontal maternal status: a hospital-based Romanian study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. (2020) 301:1189–98. 10.1007/s00404-020-05521-6
39.
MooreSIdeMCowardPYRandhawaMBorkowskaEBaylisRet al. A prospective study to investigate the relationship between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcome. Br Dent J. (2004) 197:251–8. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811620
40.
NabetCLelongNColombierM-LSixouMMussetA-MGoffinetFet al. Maternal periodontitis and the causes of preterm birth: the case-control Epipap study. J Clin Periodontol. (2010) 37:37–45. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01503.x
41.
Nov03090eriodontolntitis and the causes of preterm birth: the casepoor periodontal status be a warning sign for worse pregnancy outcome? Oral Health Prev Dent. (2020) 18:165–70. 10.3290/j.ohpd.a43356
42.
OffenbacherSBoggessKAMurthaAPJaredHLLieffSMcKaigRGet al. Progressive periodontal disease and risk of very preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. (2006) 107:29–36. 10.1097/01.Aog.0000190212.87012.96
43.
PitiphatWJoshipuraKJGillmanMWWilliamsPLDouglassCWRich-EdwardsJW. Maternal periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. (2008) 36:3–11. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00363.x
44.
RyuJ-IOhKYangHChoiB-KHaJ-EJinB-Het al. Health behaviors, periodontal conditions, and periodontal pathogens in spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study in Korea. J Periodontol. (2010) 81:855–63. 10.1902/jop.2010.090667
45.
SaddkiNBachokNAHussainNHNZainudinSLASosrosenoW. The association between maternal periodontitis and low birth weight infants among Malay women. Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiol. (2008) 36:296–304. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00383.x
46.
SouzaLMda CruzSSGomes-FilhoISBarretoMLPassos-SoaresJSTrindadeSCet al. Effect of maternal periodontitis and low birth weight-a case control study. Acta Odontol Scand. (2016) 74:73–80. 10.3109/00016357.2015.1049374
47.
TejadaBMGayet-AgeronACombescureCIrionOBaehniP. Association between early preterm birth and periodontitis according to USA and European consensus definitions. J Maternal Fetal Neonat Med. (2012) 25:2160–66. 10.3109/14767058.2012.663827
48.
TurtonMAfricaCWJ. Further evidence for periodontal disease as a risk indicator for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Int Dent J. (2017) 67:148–56. 10.1111/idj.12274
49.
VogtMSallumAWCecattiJGMoraisSS. Periodontal disease and some adverse perinatal outcomes in a cohort of low risk pregnant women. Reprod Health. (2010) 7:29. 10.1186/1742-4755-7-29
50.
ChuDMSeferovicMPaceRMAagaardKM. The microbiome in preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. (2018) 52:103–13. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.03.006
51.
BayarEBennettPRChanDSykesLMacIntyreDA. The pregnancy microbiome and preterm birth. Semin Immunopathol. (2020) 42:487–99. 10.1007/s00281-020-00817-w
52.
Al HabashnehRKhaderYSJabaliOAAlchalabiH. Prediction of preterm and low birth weight delivery by maternal periodontal parameters: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Matern Child Health J. (2013) 17:299–306. 10.1007/s10995-012-0974-2
53.
OffenbacherSJaredHLO'ReillyPGWellsSRSalviGELawrenceHPet al. Potential pathogenic mechanisms of periodontitis associated pregnancy complications. Ann Periodontol. (1998) 3:233–50. 10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.233
54.
BarakSOettinger-BarakOMachteiEESprecherHOhelG. Evidence of periopathogenic microorganisms in placentas of women with preeclampsia. J Periodontol. (2007) 78:670–6. 10.1902/jop.2007.060362
55.
Gomez-LopezNStLouisDLehrMASanchez-RodriguezENArenas-HernandezM. Immune cells in term and preterm labor. Cell Mol Immunol. (2014) 11:571–81. 10.1038/cmi.2014.46
56.
MenonRTaylorBD. Exploring inflammatory mediators in fetal and maternal compartments during human parturition. Obstet Gynecol. (2019) 134:765–73. 10.1097/aog.0000000000003470
57.
MadianosPNBobetsisYAOffenbacherS. Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) and periodontal disease: pathogenic mechanisms. J Periodontol. (2013) 84(4 Suppl.):S170–80. 10.1902/jop.2013.1340015
58.
ReyesLPhillipsPWolfeBGolosTGWalkenhorstMProgulske-FoxAet al. Porphyromonas gingivalis and adverse pregnancy outcome. J Oral Microbiol. (2017) 9:1374153. 10.1080/20002297.2017.1374153
59.
DavenportESWilliamsCESterneJASivapathasundramVFearneJMCurtisMA. The East London study of maternal chronic periodontal disease and preterm low birth weight infants: study design and prevalence data. Ann Periodontol. (1998) 3:213–21. 10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.213
60.
OffenbacherS. Maternal periodontal infections, prematurity, and growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. (2004) 47:808–21. 10.1097/01.grf.0000141894.85221.f7
61.
KayarNAAlptekinNErdalME. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene polymorphism, adverse pregnancy outcome and periodontitis in Turkish women. Arch Oral Biol. (2015) 60:1777–83. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.09.013
62.
KhaderYSTa'aniQ. Periodontal diseases and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: a meta-analysis. J Periodontol. (2005) 76:161–5. 10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.161
63.
VergnesJNSixouM. Preterm low birth weight and maternal periodontal status: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2007) 196:135.e131–7. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.028
64.
CorbellaSTaschieriSFrancettiLDe SienaFDel FabbroM. Periodontal disease as a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Odontology. (2012) 100:232–40. 10.1007/s10266-011-0036-z
65.
KonopkaTParadowska-StolarzA. Periodontitis and risk of preterm birth and low birthweight - a meta-analysis. Ginekol Pol. (2012) 83:446–53.
66.
HuangXWangJLiuJHuaLZhangDHuTet al. Maternal periodontal disease and risk of preeclampsia: a meta-analysis. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. (2014) 34:729–35. 10.1007/s11596-014-1343-8
67.
Task Task Force on Periodontal Treatment of Pregnant Women American American Academy of Periodontology. American Academy of Periodontology statement regarding periodontal management of the pregnant patient. J Periodontol. (2004) 75:495. 10.1902/jop.2004.75.3.495
Summary
Keywords
periodontal disease (PD), neonatal outcomes, preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), meta-analysis
Citation
Zhang Y, Feng W, Li J, Cui L and Chen Z-J (2022) Periodontal Disease and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Pediatr. 10:799740. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.799740
Received
22 October 2021
Accepted
31 March 2022
Published
04 May 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Huawei Mao, Capital Medical University, China
Reviewed by
Deepti Shrivastava, Al Jouf University, Saudi Arabia; Ahmad Faisal Ismail, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Zhang, Feng, Li, Cui and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Linlin Cui fdclear3@126.com
This article was submitted to Children and Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.