In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. During the process of review, we modified the content (“Identification”) of the table. But during proofing stage, incorrect version of table was provided because of our carelessness. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
TABLE 2
| Number | Retention time (min) | Ion mode | Extraction mass (Da) | Found mass (Da) | Error (ppm) | Formula | Identification | Peak area (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.61 | − | 134.0200 | 134.0201 | 0.6715 | C4H6O5 | L-(-)-Malic acid | 0.7299 |
| 2 | 4.18 | + | 153.1159 | 153.1152 | −4.9636 | C9H17NO2 | (4E)-3-Hydroxy-2,4-dimethyl-4-heptenamide | 8.8478 |
| 3 | 4.82 | − | 170.0205 | 170.0203 | −1.5880 | C7H6O5 | Gallic acid | 9.8934 |
| 4 | 10.79 | + | 178.0994 | 178.0992 | −0.7861 | C11H14O2 | 4-Isobutylbenzoic acid | 0.2395 |
| 5 | 10.86 | − | 335.1158 | 335.1153 | −1.3428 | C20H17NO4 | Berberine | 0.1830 |
| 6 | 12.75 | + | 150.1045 | 150.1044 | −0.5330 | C10H14O | Carvone | 0.1451 |
| 7 | 13.54 | − | 316.0583 | 316.0582 | −0.2848 | C16H12O7 | Isorhamnetin | 6.5621 |
| 8 | 13.89 | + | 432.1057 | 432.1052 | −1.1571 | C21H20O10 | Vitexin | 1.8300 |
| 9 | 16.25 | − | 132.0575 | 132.0577 | 1.5145 | C9H8O | trans-Cinnamaldehyde | 0.1165 |
| 10 | 16.29 | + | 314.2457 | 314.2454 | −1.1456 | C18H34O4 | (+/−)12(13)-DiHOME | 2.8721 |
| 11 | 18.99 | + | 350.2063 | 350.2064 | 0.2570 | C20H30O5 | Andrographolide | 0.2457 |
| 12 | 21.40 | − | 337.3345 | 337.3337 | −2.2233 | C22H43NO | Erucamide | 0.3520 |
Identification of the chemical constituents in SAL.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
Sonneratia apetala leaves and branches, hyperuricemia, renal uric acid transporters, oxidative stress, JAK/STAT pathway
Citation
Wu Y-L, Chen J-F, Jiang L-Y, Wu X-L, Liu Y-H, Gao C-J, Wu Y, Yi X-Q, Su Z-R, Cai J and Chen J-N (2021) Corrigendum: The Extract of Sonneratia apetala Leaves and Branches Ameliorates Hyperuricemia in Mice by Regulating Renal Uric Acid Transporters and Suppressing the Activation of the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 12:760098. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.760098
Received
17 August 2021
Accepted
27 September 2021
Published
15 October 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited and reviewed by
Michael Heinrich, UCL School of Pharmacy, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Wu, Chen, Jiang, Wu, Liu, Gao, Wu, Yi, Su, Cai and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jian Cai, caijian@sinogaf.cn; Jian-Nan Chen, chenjiannan@gzucm.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.