Targeting Growth Factor and Cytokine Pathways to Treat Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic interstitial lung disease of unknown origin that usually results in death from secondary respiratory failure within 2–5 years of diagnosis. Recent studies have identified key roles of cytokine and growth factor pathways in the pathogenesis of IPF. Although there have been numerous clinical trials of drugs investigating their efficacy in the treatment of IPF, only Pirfenidone and Nintedanib have been approved by the FDA. However, they have some major limitations, such as insufficient efficacy, undesired side effects and poor pharmacokinetic properties. To give more insights into the discovery of potential targets for the treatment of IPF, this review provides an overview of cytokines, growth factors and their signaling pathways in IPF, which have important implications for fully exploiting the therapeutic potential of targeting cytokine and growth factor pathways. Advances in the field of cytokine and growth factor pathways will help slow disease progression, prolong life, and improve the quality of life for IPF patients in the future.

1 Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology that usually results in death from secondary respiratory failure within 2–5 years of diagnosis (Meltzer and Noble, 2008). It is a rare familial and sporadic disease. CT imaging of IPF usually shows a typical usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, characterized by irregular reticular opacities with obligatory honeycombing, associated with traction bronchiectasis. IPF also exhibits histological features of UIP/IPF pattern characterized by dense fibrosis causing architecture remodeling with frequent honeycombing, patchy lung involvement by fibrosis, subpleural and/or paraseptal distribution, fibroblast foci at the edge of dense scars (Spagnolo et al., 2018; Baratella et al., 2021). With extensive basic and clinical research on the pathogenesis of IPF in recent years, some potential therapeutic targets have been discovered (Wang et al., 2021). A large number of these targets are growth factors, cytokines, and their signaling pathways, including TGF-β, CTGF, IL-13, CCL-2, leukotriene receptor, lipid proinflammatory mediators, and their downstream signaling. In addition, targeting pentraxin 2, galectin-3, oxidative stress, and B cell-mediated autoimmunity showed the potential to treat IPF. Lots of investigational drugs have entered clinical trials to test their efficacies in IPF therapy. However, there are only two currently approved IPF drugs, Pirfenidone and Nintedanib. They both slow the progression of IPF but are not able to reverse lung fibrosis (Chu et al., 2020). Lung transplantation is the only option for patients with end-stage IPF, but the donor organ shortages are an intractable problem worldwide, which means only a minority of patients have the opportunity to undergo lung transplantation (Spagnolo et al., 2018). In addition, lung transplantation is expensive, and the 10-year survival rate after surgery is only 33%–55% (Lederer and Martinez, 2018; Villavicencio et al., 2018). Therefore, there is still an urgent need to develop new drugs to treat IPF.

Although the pathophysiological mechanism of IPF remains unknown, significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis of IPF has been made in the last decade. The current paradigm assumes that recurrent alveolar epithelial cell injury and the crosstalk between dysregulated epithelial cells and mesenchymal, immune, endothelial cells can trigger abnormal wound healing responses and pulmonary fibrosis via multiple signaling pathways- (Mei et al., 2021; Moss et al., 2022). The pathogenesis of IPF is believed to be mediated by various cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors (Kelly et al., 2003). Cytokines and growth factors regulate the phenotypic switch of fibroblasts and alveolar epithelial cells (AECs), the recruitment and proliferation of mesenchymal cells, and the deposition and degradation of matrix through multiple mechanisms. Uncoordinated expression of several cytokines may be responsible for the severe matrix remodeling and epithelial-mesenchymal crosstalk in the lung microenvironment of IPF. Although the efficacy of previous anti-inflammatory treatments (e.g., TNF-α neutralization, immunosuppressants) and immunomodulatory treatments (e.g., interferon-γ) in clinical trials for the treatment of IPF has been unsatisfactory, targeting these pathways remains promising. Pirfenidone and Nintedanib, two small-molecule drugs that block multiple cytokine and growth factor signaling pathways, have been approved to slow the progression of pulmonary fibrosis. However, they have obvious defects, such as poor specificity caused by multiple targets and large doses, which lead to undesired side effects. Therefore, it is still necessary to explore the mechanism of the cytokine/growth factor pathway in IPF to find promising targets and develop targeted drugs.

Due to the pivotal role of the cytokine/growth factor pathway in the pathogenesis of IPF, this review comprehensively introduces the association of various growth factors, chemokines, interleukins, lipid proinflammatory mediators and their related signaling pathways with IPF. Related signaling pathways are also attractive therapeutic targets, including RTK and non-RTK pathways, Hedgehog pathway, Wnt pathway and Notch pathway, PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, MAPK pathway, and Hippo YAP/TAZ pathway. A large number of drugs, including many small molecules and biologics targeting cytokine/growth factor signaling pathways, have entered clinical trials to determine their efficacy against IPF, as described in this review. Taken together, the aim of this review is to provide an overview of cytokines, growth factors, and the related signaling pathways in IPF, thus providing a basis for the development of novel treatment options to alleviate or even reverse IPF.

2 The Pathological Process of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

The complexity of the pathological process of pulmonary fibrosis lies in how crosstalk between epithelial-mesenchymal cells and multiple imbalanced cytokines contribute to the disease. First, alveolar epithelial cells (AECs) are damaged, and the continuity of the basement membrane is interrupted due to a variety of external stimuli, such as radiation, the microbiome, allergens, environmental particles, autoimmunity, antineoplastic drugs (Wilson and Wynn, 2009), and SARS-CoV2 (George et al., 2020). Then, many cytokines and growth factors are released by AECs to recruit and activate inflammatory cells and fibroblasts. Inflammatory cells and some coagulation factors [e.g., tissue factors (TF) and plasminogen activation inhibitors (PAI-1)] are jointly involved in the formation of wound clots (King et al., 2011b; Betensley et al., 2016). Activated AECs and endothelial cells participate in (myo)fibroblast migration, proliferation, and differentiation.

Under normal physiological conditions, the repair process of local lesions is controlled, but in IPF, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts occur, promoting the expansion of myofibroblast population which is the main source of extracellular matrix (ECM) (Yagihashi et al., 2016; Skibba et al., 2020). Notably, EMT may be an indirect mechanism of IPF, because it does not directly contribute to the expansion of the myofibroblast population via the epithelial-to-myofibroblasts transition (Rock et al., 2011; Salton et al., 2020). In contrast, EMT is indirectly involved in the pathological process of IPF through the paracrine of fibroblast activating factor (Hill et al., 2019). It has also been reported that EMT is the result of aberrant mechanical forces and signaling pathways in IPF (Qian et al., 2020; Saito et al., 2020; Salton et al., 2020; Su et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). Due to the presence of excess fibrin in the ECM, the lung elasticity of IPF patients decreases, which manifests as alveolar collapse and the cystic dilation of residual bronchioles/alveoli. This alveolar collapse leads to a decrease in the effective volume of the alveoli used for gas exchange. Moreover, matrix stiffness forms a positive feedback pathway through the mechanosensor transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) and α6 integrin, which continuously aggravates pulmonary fibrosis (Rahaman et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2016), causing the loss of pulmonary function (respiratory ventilation) in IPF patients. In addition, excessive ECM encapsulates pulmonary capillaries, resulting in a decrease in the diffusion coefficients of oxygen and carbon dioxide and the loss of gas exchange function in the alveoli, eventually leading to the death of IPF patients from respiratory failure or related syndromes. If injury factors persist, AECs are continuously damaged, often manifesting as AEC death, an increase in the proportion of type II AECs (AT II), and impaired reepithelization (Liu et al., 2017). Therefore, different from normal repair, the repair processes involved in IPF are uncontrolled, continuous, and abnormal.

A large number of cytokines and their signaling pathways are directly involved in the accumulation of fibroblasts in lung fibrosis foci (Figure 1). Fibroblasts are the culprits directly involved in pulmonary fibrosis, and their sources include stem cells recruited from the bone marrow, fibrocytes recruited from the peripheral circulation, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) residing in the lung, and EMT/EndoMT-derived interstitial cells. Plasma cells, etc. The CXCL12-CXCR4 axis (Phillips et al., 2004), CCL2-CCR2 axis (Chong et al., 2019), CCL3-CCR5 axis (Ishida et al., 2007; Besnard et al., 2013), and CCL21-CCR7 axis (Ziegenhagen et al., 1998; Habiel and Hogaboam, 2014) are directly involved in the recruitment of fibroblasts. EMT/EndoMT of epithelial and endothelial cells is affected by the coagulation cascade and angiogenesis-related cytokines (TF, PAI-1, and VEGF) and secretion released by AECs (TGF-β, growth factors, TNF-α, MMP/TIMP, and angiotensinogen), which are implicated in multiple signaling pathways (TGF-β, Wnt, SHH, Notch, and ER stress/UPR pathways) (King et al., 2011b; Selman and Pardo, 2014; Betensley et al., 2016).

FIGURE 1

Growth factors and cytokines are an integral part of the fibrotic microenvironment, which leads to differences in the phenotype of immune cells in the alveoli between patients with pulmonary fibrosis and healthy individuals. Th1/Th2 imbalance and M1-M2 polarization are hallmarks of pulmonary fibrosis. Th2 polarization is characterized by increased secretion of IL-4 and IL-13 and decreased secretion of IFN-γ. M2 polarization can be induced by the microenvironment shaped by Th2 polarization and promotes pulmonary fibrosis through the production of TGF-β, CCL18, chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1), MMPs, and activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Shenderov et al., 2021). Th17 cells can promote fibroblast proliferation and ECM secretion by secreting IL-17 (Zhang et al., 2019a). In recent years, polymorphisms in immune-related genes have also been reported to be involved in the process of pulmonary fibrosis. For example, an increased risk or severity of IPF is associated with polymorphisms in the TLR3, Toll-interacting protein (TOLLIP), and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) genes (Whyte et al., 2000; Korthagen et al., 2012; Noth et al., 2013; O'Dwyer et al., 2013). In addition, activation of TLR2 and TLR9 has been reported to show profibrotic effects, whereas TLR3 has antifibrotic effects (Karampitsakos et al., 2017).

3 The Key Role of the TGF-β Signaling Pathway in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is a potent profibrogenic cytokine that plays a central role in the development of pulmonary fibrosis by promoting fibroblast proliferation and phenotype modulation, stimulating the deposition of ECM, and participating in crosstalk with other cytokines and signaling pathways (Ong et al., 2021).

3.1 A Brief Introduction to TGF-β Signalling Pathway

FIGURE 2

The TGF-β pathway is interrelated with the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, PI3K/Akt pathway, and pathways of other growth factors (Yan et al., 2014). Furthermore, in terms of the pathogenesis of IPF, TGF-β has been implicated in redox imbalance, mitochondrial dysfunction, EMT, MMP/TIMP imbalance, and fibrinolytic system imbalance (Chu et al., 2020).

3.2 Strategies to Treat IPF by Targeting TGF-β Pathway

Strategies for the treatment of IPF by targeting the TGF-β pathway include blocking TGF-β synthesis, preventing activation of latent TGF-β, neutralizing TGF-β ligands/receptors, and blocking canonical and non-canonical pathways (Saito et al., 2018; Hamanaka and Mutlu, 2021; Ong et al., 2021). These strategies are summarized in Figure 2.

Integrins mediate the mechanotransduction positive feedback to ECM stiffness in a TGF-β-dependent or TGF-β-independent manner, which is an important therapeutic target. TGF-β-dependent fibrosis is activated by integrins releasing TGF-β through tensile forces generated by actin-cytoskeleton interactions. In the TGF-β-independent pathway, after binding specific ECM ligands to the ectodomain of integrins, integrins bind to the cytoskeleton and various signaling proteins through their cytoplasmic tails, translating the mechanical force of cytoskeleton contraction and ECM stiffness into biochemical signals. Then, F-actin activates the downstream Rho/ROCK-YAP/TAZ signaling pathway via FAK phosphorylation, ultimately leading to fibroblast phenotype reprogramming.

There are corresponding preclinical candidate drugs for IPF that target different steps of the TGF-β pathways, including the synthesis, receptor binding, and downstream signal transduction (Ong et al., 2021), but no drug specifically for the TGF-β pathway has been approved due to the side effects of anti-TGF-β treatment (systemic autoimmune, cardiac valve problems, and carcinogenesis) (Henderson et al., 2020). Notably, to avoid systemic autoimmune disease induced by persistent systemic inhibition of TGF-β, it may be necessary to choose the correct dose or duration of treatment, coadminister anti-inflammatory drugs, selectively block TGF-β in targeted organs.

4 The Role and Underlying Mechanism of Cytokines and Growth Factors in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

As described above, cytokines, growth factors, and related signaling pathways are intensively involved in the pathogenesis of IPF. Therefore, they might be promising targets to develop novel treatment options for IPF. In this section, we describe the roles of growth factors, chemokines, interleukins, lipid pro-inflammatory mediators, and their signaling pathways in IPF. Many drugs targeting these pathways are in development, and we summarize those that have entered clinical trials to treat patients with IPF. In recent years, therapeutics targeting these pathways have shown many limitations in clinical trials. Therefore, we propose possible approaches to overcome these limitations, aiming to provide insights into the development of therapies with fewer side effects and better efficacy.

4.1 Growth Factors

Growth factors can participate in the development and progression of IPF in TGF-β-dependent or TGF-β-independent ways. These growth factors comprise platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF). Due to the successful marketing of Nintedanib (an antagonist of PDGFR/VEGFR/FGFR), many studies have focused on growth factors and their corresponding receptors. However, there remains considerable controversy regarding the roles of many growth factors in promoting fibrosis and resisting fibrosis in IPF. One of the possible reasons for the controversy is that there are many subtypes of these growth factors and their receptors, and the functions of different subtypes differ. Although pharmacological analysis of these subtypes of growth factors is difficult, it is a vital step toward precise treatment and personalized treatment, which is of substantial significance. Next, we introduce the crucial growth factors PDGF, FGF, VEGF, EGF, and CTGF in detail.

4.1.1 Platelet-Derived Growth Factor

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is a key growth factor that stimulates the proliferation and migration of fibroblasts. In a mouse model of bleomycin-induced IPF, RT–PCR (Maeda et al., 1996), PDGF antibody neutralization (Walsh et al., 1993), and Northern blotting (Zhuo et al., 2004) all demonstrated increased protein or mRNA expression of multiple subtypes of PDGF. However, the main subtypes of PDGF found in these experiments differed slightly, and the specific mechanism requires further research. A clinical study also observed that the high expression of PDGF was correlated with a low overall survival rate (Zhu et al., 2017).

Single strands encoded by the PDGF-A, B, C, and D genes can be combined in pairs to form five types of dimers, AA/BB/AB/CC/DD (Heldin and Westermark, 1999; Li and Eriksson, 2003; Günther et al., 2012). PDGFRs (PDGF receptors) are also homo/heterodimerically formed by combinations of single-chain PDGF-α/PDGF-β. After PDGF binds to the PDGF receptor, PDGFR dimerization can be induced; subsequently, the two PDGFRs after autophosphorylation can couple various downstream signal transduction pathways (Heldin and Westermark, 1999), such as Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) through Grb2 and Shc adaptor proteins and PI3K and phospholipase C-γ (PLCγ) (Nishioka et al., 2013). PDGFR also participates in the migration and chemotaxis of fibroblasts through the integrin-FAK pathway. PDGF, as the main mitogen, can strongly promote the proliferation of fibroblasts and stimulate collagen synthesis (Heldin and Westermark, 1999). PDGF also participates in cell migration through Ca²⁺ influx and cytoskeleton rearrangement (Nishioka et al., 2013).

4.1.2 Fibroblast Growth Factor

FGFs have been divided into seven subgroups encoded by 22 mammalian genomes. Among the 22 FGFs encoded by genomes, 4 FGFs are FGFR-independent, and the remaining 18 extracellular FGFs bind to 7 FGFR subtypes (FGFR1b, FGFR1c, FGFR2b, FGFR2c, FGFR3b, FGFR3c, and FGFRR4). An FGF can bind to multiple FGFRs. FGFs rely on heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) and Klotho-type coreceptors to improve their binding to FGFRs (Ornitz and Itoh, 2022). After FGF-FGFR binding, through the autophosphorylation of FGFRs, with the help of FGFR substrate 2 and PLCγ, signals are transferred to the RAS-ERK, PI3K/AKT, PKC, and JAK-STAT signaling cascades, which mediate the survival, proliferation, differentiation, or migration of cells (Inomata et al., 2015; Katoh, 2018).

Subtypes of FGFs have functional differences and play different roles in IPF (Yang et al., 2021). FGF1 (acid FGF or aFGF) has an anti-fibrotic function. The serum FGF1 level of patients with IPF was found to be higher than that of the control group (Shimbori et al., 2016). In rat models induced by TGF-β1, FGF1 could relieve IPF by inhibiting the TGF-β1 signaling pathway and promoting the proliferation of AECs (Shimbori et al., 2016). Further research found that “FGF1 + heparin treatment” could reverse EMT through the MAPK/ERK kinase pathway, leading to phosphorylation of ERK-1 and dephosphorylation of Smad2 (Ramos et al., 2010). FGF2 (basic FGF or bFGF) has a proliferative effect on lung fibroblasts (Hetzel et al., 2005; Khalil et al., 2005), and soluble FGFR2c significantly reduces TGF-β-induced IPF in mice (Ju et al., 2012). However, it has also been reported that FGF2 is antifibrotic in part through decreased collagen expression and fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation (Koo et al., 2018). FGF9 and FGF18 promote the survival and migration of HLFs and inhibit myofibroblast differentiation in vitro (Joannes et al., 2016). More FGF9 was expressed in lung tissue myofibroblasts in patients with IPF than in healthy individuals, and it promoted epithelial cell growth and expansion of pulmonary interstitial through the Wnt7B/β-catenin signaling pathway (Yin et al., 2008). FGF10 plays an antifibrotic role via autocrine and paracrine signaling. During autocrine signaling, by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR γ), FGF10 blocks the lipofibroblast-to-myofibroblast transformation induced by TGF-β1 and promotes the transformation from myofibroblasts to lipofibroblasts. In addition, the FGF10 paracrine signal was considered crucial to the differentiation of alveolar epithelial progenitor cells during development and the maintenance of AT II in a steady state (Wu et al., 2018). FGF21 attenuates the TGF-β pathway via decreased oxidative stress in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice (Zhang et al., 2018). Coadministration of FGF23 and its coreceptor α-Klotho led to a significant reduction in fibrosis and inflammation (Barnes et al., 2019).

In summary, FGF1, FGF10, FGF21, and FGF23 are anti-fibrotic, while FGF2, FGF9, and FGF18 exhibit contradictory functions.

4.1.3 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

The VEGF family has seven members: VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-E, placental growth factor, and snake venom vascular endothelial growth factors (Inomata et al., 2015). Most studies have focused on the correlation between VEGF-A and IPF; thus, our description mainly focuses on VEGF-A. The most studied and dominant VEGF-A165 can be divided into VEGF-A165a and VEGF-A165b by the splice site. VEGF-A165a can promote angiogenesis, and VEGF-A165b can inhibit angiogenesis.

VEGF-A can bind to VEGFR1 (Flt-1), VEGFR2 (KDR or Flk1), and their coreceptors neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2. Among them, VEGFR1 binds to circulating VEGF-α and reduces its bioavailability to VEGFR2. The coreceptors neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2 assist in the signal transduction of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. After binding to VEGFR2, VEGF-A165 can activate the downstream Akt pathway, Src signaling pathway, NCK and the p38 MAPK pathway, and integrin/FAK pathway (Fruttiger, 2008; Barratt et al., 2018). VEGF can stimulate the growth of alveolar epithelial type II cells and the production of alveolar surfactant, form new blood vessels, and help epithelial cells and endothelial cells resist apoptosis (Gerber et al., 1998a; Gerber et al., 1998b; Brown et al., 2001; Compernolle et al., 2002; Alavi et al., 2003; Mura et al., 2006; Roberts et al., 2007; Kuhn et al., 2010; Varet et al., 2010; Barratt et al., 2018).

Many contradictory effects of VEGF-A on IPF have been observed in animal models and clinical trials. The possible reasons for these differences are as follows: different animal models, different sampling sites, heterogeneity within and between individuals, and different VEGF-A subtypes caused by diverse splice sites. Different subtypes of VEGF-A may have mutually coordinated pathophysiological relationships. In in vitro experiments, VEGF-A165a has been proven to promote the proliferation of AT II and fibroblasts, increase the expansion of ECM, and play a role in promoting fibrosis, and VEGF-A165b could counteract this effect (Varet et al., 2010; Barratt et al., 2017). Thus, VEGF-A165b may be a compensatory protective mechanism.

4.1.4 Epidermal Growth Factor

The EGF receptor (EGFR, also known as ErbB1 or HER1) belongs to the ErbB family receptor tyrosine kinases. EGFR has seven corresponding ligands: EGF, transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), amphiregulin, betacellulin (BTC), epiregulin, epigen, and heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF). After ligands bind to EGFR, the autophosphorylation of EGFR can activate the downstream MAPK, Akt, and JNK pathways and promote cell proliferation (Iwamoto and Mekada, 2012).

The relationship between the ErbB family (HER) and IPF remains unclear and thus requires further research. After blocking HER in vivo, studies have found that collagen deposition decreases and lung morphology improves, which indirectly indicates that the ErbB family plays a role in fibrosis (Rice et al., 1999; Faress et al., 2007). In addition, in patients with IPF, the mRNA level of EGFR was upregulated in proliferative alveolar epithelial cells around fibrosis, and the mRNA level of EGFR was positively correlated with the mRNA level of type I collagen and negatively correlated with the clinical prognosis (Tzouvelekis et al., 2013).

4.1.5 Connective Tissue Growth Factor

CTGF, also known as CNN2, HCS24, or IGFBP8, belongs to the CNN family. CTGF can interact with a wide range of ECM components, but this also means that the biological action of CTGF is highly dependent on the local microenvironment. CTGF directly binds to other growth factors (e.g., TGF-β, BMPs, and VEGF), which influence signal emission/transduction (Choi, 2012). CTGF can be secreted by interstitial cells, such as proliferating AT II and activated fibroblasts (Pan et al., 2001). The peak of CTGF content mainly appears at the early stage of IPF, and the peak of CTGF appears earlier than the deposition of collagen in the lungs (Wang et al., 2011), which indicates that CTGF may be involved in the early-stage repair of lung tissue injury.

As an auxiliary regulator of TGF-β in IPF in the local microenvironment, CTGF can participate in abnormal tissue repair processes, such as ECM generation and the mobilization of fibroblasts, by assisting TGF-β (Wang et al., 2011). There was an interaction between TGF-β and CTGF in IPF animal models induced by TGF-β/bleomycin, and IPF could be alleviated by the CTGF antibody (FG-3019, pamrevlumab) (Wang et al., 2011). CTGF-deficient transgenic mice had the ability to resist IPF induced by bleomycin (Liu et al., 2011). Therefore, a general belief is that CTGF, as a fibrosis-promoting medium, is a possible target for the research and development of anti-IPF drugs. Pamrevlumab, a human recombinant mAb of CTGF, is the only antibody drug that has shown activity in a phase II clinical trial against IPF. In a recent randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial for patients with IPF, pamrevlumab showed good safety and certain therapeutic effects, such as slowing the decline of pulmonary function and delaying the progression of fibrosis by HR-CT, which is a milestone of single-target therapy (Lipson et al., 2012; Raghu et al., 2016). The phase III clinical trial of pamrevlumab for IPF is at the recruitment stage (NCT04419558/NCT03955146).

4.2 Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors

Chemokines are small molecule proteins with chemotactic effects on specific cells, and there are four conserved cysteine residues. According to the differences in cysteine residues, chemokines have been divided into four main subfamilies: CXC, CC, CX3C, and XC. Although the role of some chemokines in IPF remains unknown, many studies have demonstrated that chemokines can promote fibrosis or resist fibrosis. It has been reported that pulmonary fibrosis in animal models can be attenuated by knocking out genes encoding chemokines or neutralizing chemokines with antibodies [CCL2-CCR2 (Moore et al., 2001; Murray et al., 2008; Phan et al., 2021), CCL11-CCR3 (Huaux et al., 2005), CCL17 (Agostini and Gurrieri, 2006), CCL21-CCR7 (Habiel and Hogaboam, 2014), CCL22 (Strieter, 2005), CXCL6 (Besnard et al., 2013), CXCL12 (Phillips et al., 2004), CXCL14 (Li et al., 2019), CX3CL1-CX3CR1 (Rivas-Fuentes et al., 2020), CCR5 (Ishida et al., 2007)]. The CXCL11-CXCR3 axis has anti-pulmonary fibrosis effects in a mouse model of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis (Strieter, 2005).

Chemokines play a crucial role in the pathological process of IPF (Figure 3). CXCL12-CXCR4 (Phillips et al., 2004), CCL2-CCR2 (Chong et al., 2019) CCL3-CCR5 (Ishida et al., 2007; Besnard et al., 2013), CCL11-CCR3 (Puxeddu et al., 2006), CCL21-CCR7 (Ziegenhagen et al., 1998; Habiel and Hogaboam, 2014), CCL26 (Kohan et al., 2010) promote the migration of fibrocytes to the lung, whereas CXCL10 (Agostini and Gurrieri, 2006) inhibits the migration of fibrocytes to the lung. CCL2-CCR2 (Hambly et al., 2015), CCL11 (Puxeddu et al., 2006), CCL21-CCR7 (Ziegenhagen et al., 1998; Habiel and Hogaboam, 2014), CCL24 (Kohan et al., 2010) promote fibroblast proliferation. CCL18 (Hambly et al., 2015) and CCL21-CCR7 (Ziegenhagen et al., 1998; Habiel and Hogaboam, 2014) participate in the differentiation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts and stimulate collagen synthesis. CCL21-CCR7 is involved in the survival of fibroblasts (Ziegenhagen et al., 1998; Habiel and Hogaboam, 2014). CCL2-CCR2 (Agostini and Gurrieri, 2006; Besnard et al., 2013; Hambly et al., 2015), CCL3-CCR5 (Ishida et al., 2007), CCL17-CCR4 (Karman et al., 2021), CCL22-CCR4 (Yogo et al., 2009), CX3CL1-CX3CR1 (Rivas-Fuentes et al., 2020) promote migration of monocytes and macrophages. CCL2 (Rose et al., 2003), CCL17 (Besnard et al., 2013), CCL22 (Besnard et al., 2013), CCR3 (Fulkerson et al., 2006), CCR4 (Yoshinouchi et al., 2007) are involved in type 2 immunity, whereas CCR5 (Loetscher et al., 1998) is involved in type 1 immunity. CXCR3 counteracts the profibrotic effect of IL-13 by assisting IL-13 receptor α2 gene expression (Pignatti et al., 2006; Yoshinouchi et al., 2007; Barnes et al., 2015). A phase II clinical trial of CNTO 888 (CCL2 mAb) failed to provide benefit to FVC in IPF patients (NCT00786201). Nonetheless, the role of chemokines in IPF remains to be further investigated.

FIGURE 3

4.3 Interleukins

Interleukins are a class of cytokines generated by lymphocytes, monocytes, and other non-monocytes. In addition to affecting fibrosis by modulating the Th1/Th2 balance, many studies have shown that interleukins can also directly affect fibroblasts and epithelial cells (Table 1). Thus, interleukins are expected to be developed as drugs and biomarkers for treating IPF.

However, clinical trials of IPF treatments targeting IL-4 and IL-13 have not gone well. Several drugs targeting IL-13 have entered clinical trials for IPF, but none of them have shown protective effects on lung function. Although clinical trials of IPF antibody drugs have mostly failed in phase II, there is still hope for interleukin therapy. Inhibition of IL-11 blocks TGF-β1, PDGF, FGF2, IL-13, OSM (Oncostatin M), and endothelin 1-mediated fibroblast activation (Ng et al., 2019).

Notably, interleukin supplementation alone may not reverse the profibrotic phenotype of cells, and the regulation of cell–cell interactions or phenotypic transformation may be more promising. In addition, anti-inflammatory interleukins should be used with caution in clinical trials, and attention should be given to their side effects on patient immune function. In addition, rational design of interleukin dosage forms is very important because the concentration of the drug in the lungs can explain some of the differences in the study results.

4.4 Lipid Proinflammatory Mediators

Various lipids and their metabolic derivatives play vital roles in IPF. Although glucocorticoids (PLA2 inhibitor) have not shown positive effects in the treatment of IPF in clinical trials, these findings do not indicate that all lipid metabolism pathways have no significance as therapeutic targets of IPF. In contrast, metabolomic studies on fibroblasts have received increasing attention in recent years.

LT and PG are implicated in the pathogenesis of IPF. In arachidonic acid metabolic pathways, phospholipids produce arachidonic acid under the catalysis of phospholipase A2 (PLA2). Then, arachidonic acid produced leukotriene (LT) and prostaglandin (PG) under the catalysis of 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) and cyclooxygenase (COX), respectively. Among them, PGF2a and LTs promote fibrosis, and PGE2 resists fibrosis (Suryadevara et al., 2020). A phase II trial (NCT02503657) on the safety and tolerability of Tipelukast/MN-001 (LT receptor inhibitor, 5-LO inhibitor and PDE inhibitor) in patients with IPF is ongoing.

The SPHK1/S1P/S1PR axis is involved in pulmonary fibrosis. In sphingolipid metabolism, sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) phosphorylates sphingosine to produce sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). Then, the binding of S1P to the S1P receptor can lead to mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and promote YAP1 entry into cell nuclei, affecting the differentiation of myofibroblasts and matrix remodeling (Huang et al., 2020). Targeting the SPHK1/S1P/S1PR axis, PF543 (SPHK1 inhibitor), Mito TEMPO (mitochondria-targeted superoxide dismutase, which can reduce mtROS) and verteporfin (YAP inhibitor) have been reported, but these drugs have not entered clinical trials on IPF treatment.

The ATX/LPA/LPAR axis plays a potent role in pulmonary fibrosis. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) has been proven to activate G protein-mediated signal transduction pathways by binding to its receptors (LPAR1 and LPAR2), which leads to different reactions from lung cells, including the promotion of the apoptosis of epithelial cells, regulation of endothelial permeability, activation of αvβ6 integrin-mediated TGF-β signaling, secretion of IL-8, and recruitment and survival of fibroblasts (Tager et al., 2008; Ninou et al., 2018). LPA can promote the apoptosis of epithelial cells (Suryadevara et al., 2020). LPA is produced by many metabolic pathways in vivo, among which ATX/LPA/LPAR is the main pathway. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) generates LPC (lysophosphatidylcholine) under the action of phospholipase A1/phospholipase A2 (PLA1/PLA2), and LPC is hydrolyzed under the action of autotaxin (ATX)/lysoPLD to generate LPA. LPA exerts biological effects by binding to LPAR (Suryadevara et al., 2020). Drugs targeting different positions of the ATX/LPA/LPAR axis have entered clinical trials. The ATX inhibitors BBT-877 and GLPG1690 entered phase I clinical trials (completed) and phase III clinical trials (terminated) on their anti-IPF treatment, respectively. The LPA1 receptor antagonists BMS-986278 (recruiting) and BMS-986020 (completed) have also entered phase II clinical trials.

5 Growth Factor and Cytokine Signaling Cascades in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

5.1 Receptor-Type Tyrosine Kinases and Non-Receptor-Type Tyrosine Kinases Signaling Cascades

Due to the central role of growth factors in IPF, the signaling cascade of growth factor receptors is an indispensable topic. Growth factor receptors (GFRs) are receptor-type tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and their counterparts are non-receptor-type tyrosine kinases (non-RTKs) free in the cytoplasm. Src family kinases (SFKs) are a non-RTK family with eleven members, among which Src, Yes and Fyn are ubiquitously reported (Li et al., 2020). RTK and non-RTK signaling crosstalk with numerous other pathways and contribute to fibrosis via phenotype modulation of fibroblasts and AECs (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4

The combination of TGF-β and TBR can not only initiate the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway but also indirectly participate in the differentiation of fibroblasts by activating Src/p38 (Pechkovsky et al., 2008) and Fyn/STAT (Xu et al., 2019). Integrins can activate SFKs to activate β-catenin and participate in EMT of epithelial cells (Ulsamer et al., 2012). CTGF participates in abnormal tissue repair by assisting TGF-β. The Notch pathway can also promote TGF-β-mediated fibroblast differentiation through activation of Smads (Aoyagi-Ikeda et al., 2011). MAP3K19 regulates nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the activated R-Smads, which promotes TGF-β-mediated fibrosis (Boehme et al., 2016). MKP-5, a tyrosine phosphatase negatively regulating the p38 and JNK pathways, inhibits Smad7 activity but promotes Smad3 phosphorylation and the expression of fibrogenic genes (Xylourgidis et al., 2019).

PDGFR activates NF-κB via the Src/PI3K/Akt pathway (Cheng et al., 2014). PKCδ attenuates pulmonary fibrosis by enhancing the stability and activity of A20, an inhibitory protein of NF-κB signaling. The PDGFR/mTOR signaling pathway is associated with PINK1/PARP2 dysregulation-induced mitophagy deficiency, leading to myofibroblast differentiation and proliferation (Tsubouchi et al., 2018). Different isoforms of FGF participate in the process of fibrosis through FGFR; for example, FGF1 (Ramos et al., 2010) and FGF10 (Cheng et al., 2014) are anti-fibrotic, while FGF2 is pro-fibrotic (Ju et al., 2012). VEGF-A165a has been proven to promote the proliferation of AT II cells and fibroblasts and ECM expansion, and VEGF-A165b could counteract this effect (Varet et al., 2010; Barratt et al., 2017). VEGFR1 induces pulmonary fibrosis by promoting the migration of VEGFR1+ cells, which is dependent on the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis (Amano et al., 2021). In addition to the above GFR, Gas6/TAM receptor-type tyrosine kinases have also been reported to promote pulmonary fibrosis (Espindola et al., 2018).

5.2 Developmental Pathways: Hedgehog, Wnt, and Notch

Developmental pathways play an important role in the developmental stages of the lung. In adults, some developmental pathways enter a dormant state but are activated again when abnormal lung damage occurs. These signaling pathways include the TGF-β, FGF, Hedgehog, Wnt, and Notch signaling pathways (Chanda et al., 2019) (Figure 5). Among them, TGF-β and FGF have been mentioned in the previous section and will not be repeated here.

FIGURE 5

The Hedgehog pathway starts with the Hedgehog ligand (Hh) and its receptor ptch1 and then activates downstream pathways in a Gli transcription factor-dependent (classical) or independent (non-classical) manner. In the canonical pathway, the binding of Hh to ptch1 relieves the inhibitory effect of ptch1 on Smo. Then, Smo is transferred to the plasma membrane and participates in the regulation of genes in the nucleus by activating full-length Gli to become Gli1/2/3 (active form), thereby inducing AEC apoptosis, fibroblast differentiation, EMT, and M2 polarization (Effendi and Nagano, 2021). In the non-canonical pathway (Type I), the binding of Hh to ptch1 prevents cyclin B1 from recruiting proapoptotic complexes, thereby failing to activate caspase-mediated apoptosis. After entering the nucleus, cyclin B1 can also regulate cell cycle progression by promoting cell proliferation (Robbins et al., 2012; Effendi and Nagano, 2021). In the non-canonical pathway (Type II), the coupling of Smo to Gi protein activates downstream PI3K, Rho, and Rac1, leading to an increase in intracellular calcium concentration and cytoskeleton rearrangement (Robbins et al., 2012; Effendi and Nagano, 2021).

The Wnt signaling pathway is an important signaling pathway in response to postnatal injury and regeneration. Binding of Wnt3a to Frizzled (FZD), followed by β-catenin accumulation, induces AECs to release proinflammatory factors (IL-6, IL-1β) and promotes fibroblast collagen synthesis. In addition, Wnt-inducible signaling protein-1 (WISP-1) is also involved in AEC reprogramming and proliferation (Königshoff et al., 2009). TGF-β promotes the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into fibroblasts by activating Gli to secrete Wnt5a, Wnt10a, and Wnt7b, thereby initiating the Wnt pathway (Chen et al., 2018; Martin-Medina et al., 2018). Since Wnt signaling is associated with a large number of normal physiological functions, there are currently no anti-IPF drugs targeting this pathway.

The Notch pathway is a highly conserved signaling pathway that mediates short-range signaling in neighboring cells. The Notch ligand-expressing cell binds to the Notch receptor, causing the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) of the Notch receptor to break and enter the nucleus to lead to gene transcription. Lfng positively regulates this process, while Numb negatively regulates this process (Kiyokawa and Morimoto, 2020). Notch is also involved in the TGF-β/Smad3-mediated transformation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts (Aoyagi-Ikeda et al., 2011). Notch also induces phosphorylation of Akt by stimulating the expression of insulin-like growth factor-1R (IGF1R), which in turn promotes pulmonary fibrosis by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) (Eliasz et al., 2010).

5.3 Other Critical Signaling Cascades in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: JAK/STAT, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, MAPK, and Hippo-YAP/TAZ

In recent years, research on the molecular mechanism of fibrosis has become increasingly in depth, and the JAK/STAT, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, MAPK, and Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling cascades have received extensive attention (Figure 6). Drugs targeting these signaling pathways are already in clinical trials.

FIGURE 6

Cells respond to inflammatory factors rapidly through JAK/STAT signaling. After interleukins (IL-4, IL-6, IL-11, IL-13, and IL-31) and growth factors (TGF-β, PDGF, VEGF, EGF, and FGF) bind to the corresponding receptors, they can activate and interact with the receptors. Receptor-coupled JAKs (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2) phosphorylate STATs (STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT5, and STAT6) (Montero et al., 2021). Homodimerized STAT enters the nucleus to affect gene transcription, leading to fibroblast differentiation, EMT, senescence, autophagy, and ERS (Montero et al., 2021). Despite numerous isoforms of JAK and STAT, JAK2/STAT3 plays a dominant role in pulmonary fibrosis (Milara et al., 2018). Jaktinib dihydrochloride monohydrate and CC-90001, as JAK1/2 inhibitors, have entered phase II clinical trials (NCT04312594 and NCT03142191, respectively). Since different subtypes of STAT share downstream pathways, blocking only one subtype of STAT may lead to ineffective treatment due to the compensatory effect of other subtypes of STAT. Therefore, no therapeutic drugs targeting STAT have entered clinical trials.

PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling is involved in autophagy and has caused a huge hit in the field of tumor therapy. A genome-wide association study revealed an association of mTOR with susceptibility to fibrosis (Allen et al., 2020). Growth factors and cytokines activate PI3K by binding to receptor-type tyrosine kinases, which in turn catalyze the phosphorylation of PIP2 to PIP3. PIP3 activates Akt and its downstream mTOR complex (mTORC), which promotes collagen synthesis, proliferation in fibroblasts, and EMT in epithelial cells (Lawrence and Nho, 2018; Fang et al., 2020). PTEN can inhibit the phosphorylation of PIP2, thereby inhibiting the signaling pathway downstream of PI3K and reducing the senescence of AECs (Qiu et al., 2019). Akt relieves the inhibition of mTORC1 by TSC1/TSC2 by phosphorylating TSC2 (Huang and Manning, 2009). mTOR also intersects with NF-κB signaling (Guo et al., 2013). TGF-β signaling can activate Akt in a SEMA 7A-dependent manner, which in turn activates downstream mTOR signaling and promotes lung fibrosis (Reilkoff et al., 2013). mTOR can activate collagen synthesis via 4E-BP1 (Woodcock et al., 2019). RPS6KB2 (ribosomal protein S6 kinase B 2) is reported to be involved in the process of aging and IPF due to its activation by growth factors and regulation of the protein kinase mTOR signaling pathway (Hao et al., 2017).

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) mainly consists of three downstream cascades, the JNK, p38 and ERK pathways. JNK/p38 is activated via a MAP3K-MAP2K-MAPK signaling cascade, whereas ERK is activated via a MAP3K-Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK cascade (Woodcock et al., 2019). JNK and p38 signaling participates in apoptosis, necroptosis, and EMT of AEC; fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation; and maintenance of the myofibroblast phenotype (Kasuya et al., 2021). MK2, downstream of the p38 pathway, has a role in fibroblast invasion and fibrosis (Liang et al., 2019). Growth factors can activate ERK5, and then ERK5 and p90RSK can acetylate Smad, thereby promoting the TGF-β/Smad pathway (Kim et al., 2020). The ERK1/2-calpain pathway has been reported to be associated with pulmonary fibrosis in vivo and in vitro (Zou et al., 2020).

The Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway is involved in pulmonary fibrosis through the integrin pathway, G protein-coupled receptor pathway, and mechanotransduction pathway. Integrins promote the growth, stability, and contractibility of F-actin by activating FAK, thereby relieving the inhibitory effect of large tumor suppressor kinase 1 and 2 (LAST1/2) on YAP/TAZ. After entering the nucleus, YAP/TAZ regulates AT I apoptosis and AT II exhaustion, fibroblast proliferation and ECM expansion (Sun et al., 2021). The mechanical force of ECM can also activate F-actin via Rho/ROCK signaling and promote pulmonary fibrosis (Zhou et al., 2013). Different GPCR signaling pathways (Gαs, Gα12/13, Gαq, and Gαi/o) regulate LAST1/2 activity through the Rho/ROCK/F-actin pathway (Haak et al., 2020). Tank binding kinase 1 (TBK1) activates YAP/TAZ in a proteasomal machinery-dependent but LAST-independent manner (Aravamudhan et al., 2020).

6 Advances in the Development of Anti-IPF Drugs Targeting Cytokine and Growth Factor Pathways

6.1 Pirfenidone and Nintedanib, Two FDA-Approved Drugs for Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Antifibrotic therapy provides survival benefit and protection against all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalization for IPF patients (Mooney et al., 2021). FDA approved antifibrotic drugs for treating IPF include Pirfenidone and Nintedanib, and their clinical efficacy is similar though there are no high-quality clinical trials directly comparing the efficacy of the them (Marijic et al., 2021). Regarding their mechanism of action, both of them target multiple growth factor and cytokine-related signaling pathways. Now that the pathogenesis of IPF remains unclear, targeting multiple pathways may be an effective treatment strategy for IPF. In addition, since the mechanisms of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib are not the same, a combination treatment may have synergistic effects. The combination of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib has been shown to be well tolerated and safe, which encourages further research into combination therapy (Flaherty et al., 2018; Vancheri et al., 2018). How to relieve the side effects caused by the off-target effects of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib is also an important topic.

6.1.1 Pirfenidone

Pirfenidone is a pyridine compound approved for marketing in Japan in 2008. It was originally developed as an anti-inflammatory drug. Interestingly, studies in animal models demonstrated that it had the effect of resisting fibrosis of various organs, and it was later approved for IPF treatment. The anti-fibrotic mechanism of Pirfenidone has not been fully elucidated. Published studies indicated that it could inhibit fibrosis mainly by blocking TNF-α and TGF-β/Smad pathways (Oku et al., 2002; Schaefer et al., 2011; Conte et al., 2014).

Three large-scaled RCTs demonstrated that Pirfenidone could delay FVC decline, improve progression-free survival, increase exercise tolerance, and reduce all-cause or IPF related mortality (Taniguchi et al., 2010; Noble et al., 2011; Noble et al., 2012; King et al., 2014). Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs also indicated that Pirfenidone treatment was associated with a longer progression-free-survival and a lower incidence of acute exacerbation (Wu et al., 2021). In the real-world practice, Pirfenidone also provided beneficial effects on survival and pulmonary function decline (Lee et al., 2021). Moreover, A post hoc analysis of ASCEND and CAPACITY program suggested a clinically relevant benefit of Pirfenidone in IPF patients with more advanced lung function impairment (Nathan et al., 2019).

However, the use of Pirfenidone has some limitations, such as a short half-life (2.5 h) and a high daily dose (2,403 mg/day). Although generally well tolerated, a minority of patients discontinued treatment due to gastrointestinal and skin-related adverse events. These side effects can be mitigated or prevented by taking it with/after meals, avoiding Sun exposure, wearing protective clothing, and using broad-spectrum sunscreens (Costabel et al., 2014). In addition, caution is recommended prior to Pirfenidone use in IPF patients with severe hepatic and renal insufficiency.

6.1.2 Nintedanib

Nintedanib is a small molecule tyrosinase inhibitor approved for marketing in 2014. Initially, researchers intended to screen drugs that selectively inhibit VEGFR-2 for anticancer treatment. However, in subsequent research, Nintedanib had good antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects and was approved for IPF treatment. Nintedanib mainly inhibits tyrosine kinase receptors, such as PDGFR, FGFR, and VEGFR, and non-receptor tyrosine kinases, such as Src and Flt-3 (Hilberg et al., 2008).

The INPULSIS-1 and INPULSIS-2 programs demonstrated that Nintedanib could delay FVC decline and reduce the risk of disease progression (Richeldi et al., 2014; Keating, 2015). However, the parameter of time to first AE and HRQL (Health-related Quality of Life) was inconsistent between INPULSIS-1 and INPULSIS-2 (Keating, 2015). Interestingly, despite similar efficacy of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib, there was a higher rate of discontinuation of Nintedanib due to adverse effects (Takehara et al., 2022). Gastrointestinal adverse events (diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting) were reported most commonly (Keating, 2015). Patients treated with Nintedanib who experience diarrhea should maintain hydration and take antidiarrheal therapy as soon as symptoms occur. Dose reduction can also be taken into consideration (Corte et al., 2015).

The timing of antifibrotic therapy may influence the outcome of IPF treatment. A retrospective study indicated that patients who initiated Nintedanib immediately after IPF diagnosis might have reduced hospitalization risk and medical costs compared with those who start treatment later (Singer et al., 2022). A post hoc analysis of INPULSIS program suggested that probable UIP with traction bronchiectasis in high-resolution CT might be sufficient for patients to benefit from Nintedanib, implying the importance of early antifibrotic therapy (Lobo, 2016).

Although high-quality clinical trial data are currently lacking to directly demonstrate that Nintedanib is effective in end-stage IPF, the latest post hoc analyses of the INPULSIS and INSTAGE programs suggest that it has some effect in IPF patients with more severely impaired gas exchange (Richeldi et al., 2020).

6.1.3 Implications of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib for Anti-Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Drug Discovery

With the launch of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in multiple countries, the number of IPF patients not receiving anti-fibrotic therapy will decrease in the future, and it will become increasingly difficult to observe the natural progression of IPF. For ethical reasons and feasibility of patient recruitment, more and more clinical trials of new drugs will use Pirfenidone and Nintedanib as controls. This sets a higher standard for the efficacy of new drugs. In addition, there will be a trend to combine new drugs with existing anti-fibrotic therapies in clinical trials, and whether they can bring additional benefits will be the determining factor. Furthermore, whether a single drug is sufficient to effectively delay the progression of IPF is an important pharmacoeconomic proposition. Since IPF is a rapidly progressive and irreversible disease, whether anti-fibrotic therapy is effective in different stages of IPF, especially in end-stage IPF and suspected IPF, also deserves further study. There are currently no high-quality clinical trials that directly demonstrate the efficacy of antifibrotic therapy in end-stage IPF. In addition, whether patients with suspected IPF on unbiopsied CT images without biopsy require prophylactic antifibrotic therapy remains to be further investigated.

6.2 Anti-Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Drugs Targeting Cytokine and Growth Factor Pathways in Clinical Trials

With the continuous exploration of the pathophysiological process of IPF and the continuous clarification of the cytokine and growth factor pathways, the targets of IPF treatment have also become diversified. Many targets and drugs developed based on them have entered clinical trials (Table 2). Although most of them fail to enter phase III clinical trials, a few drugs show promise in the treatment of IPF. Currently, pamrevlumab (CTGF mAb) and PRM-151 (recombinant pentraxin 2) have successfully entered Phase III clinical trials.

6.3 Information About Clinical Trials That Target Complications and Comorbidities of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Complications and comorbidities are of substantial significance to the disease progression and quality of life in IPF patients.

Cough affects up to 80% of patients with IPF, is frequently disabling, and lacks effective therapy. A 24-week, double-blind, two-treatment, 24 patients enrolled, two-period crossover trial showed that thalidomide improved cough and respiratory quality of life in patients with IPF (Horton et al., 2012).

Patients with IPF are also at risk of developing pulmonary hypertension as the underlying condition worsens (Tanaka et al., 2017). The BUILD-3 program showed no benefit of Bosentan in the life quality of IPF patients (King et al., 2011a). However, a prospective study showed that Bosentan was associated with a trend toward decreased adverse events and improved respiratory status (Tanaka et al., 2017). Sildenafil is an FDA-approved drug for pulmonary arterial hypertension. A double-blind randomized clinical trial showed that the combination of Sildenafil and Nintedanib significantly reduced BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide, an indicator of heart failure) in IPF patients with right ventricular dysfunction compared with Nintedanib alone, but did not improve HRQL (Behr et al., 2019; Suarez-Cuartin and Molina-Molina, 2019). More recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs reported that Sildenafil probably reduced all-cause mortality in IPF patients (Pitre et al., 2022), although more studies are needed to confirm this. The 2015 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline conditionally recommends against the use of Bosentan and Sildenafil, while the 2011 version strongly recommends against the use of them.

Increased bacterial load and loss of microbial diversity have been reported in IPF (Han et al., 2014; Molyneaux et al., 2014), which are associated with disease progression and immune response (Huang et al., 2017; Molyneaux et al., 2017). However, the role of several antibiotics in IPF appears to be controversial. A retrospective study of 85 AE-IPF patients showed that azithromycin may improve survival in patients with AE-IPF compared with a fluoroquinolone-based regimen (Kawamura et al., 2017). On the contrary, a randomized controlled crossover study of 25 IPF patients does not support the use of low-dose azithromycin for chronic cough in IPF (Guler et al., 2021). In addition, a pragmatic randomized unblinded clinical study of 513 IPF patients didn’t support the additional use of co-trimoxazole or doxycycline (Martinez et al., 2021). Thus, the selection of antibiotics and the effect of them on immune cells need to be further explored.

Gastroesophageal reflux occurs in a high proportion of IPF patients (Raghu et al., 2015), and chronic microaspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux is thought to play a role in disease pathogenesis and progression (Savarino et al., 2013). The 2015 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline conditionally recommends anti-acid therapy. However, whether anti-acid therapy is effective in IPF patients remains highly controversial (Lee et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2013; Kreuter et al., 2016; Raghu et al., 2018; Tran et al., 2021). In addition, whether anti-acid treatment should choose anti-acid drugs or radical therapy (such as Nissen fundoplication) requires further study (Johannson et al., 2017). Therefore, to investigate the efficacy of anti-acid therapy in slowing the progression of IPF, a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial using lansoprazole is currently enrolling patients with IPF (NCT04965298).

7 Challenge and Outlook

Research on the pathogenesis of IPF has made considerable progress. After years of preclinical research and clinical studies, the pathogenesis of IPF has changed from simple inflammation to abnormal epithelial-mesenchymal crosstalk and other pathogenic mechanisms. Based on the emerging pathological mechanism, many studies have systematically studied the key roles of cytokine and growth factor pathways in the pathogenesis of IPF. The approval of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib shows that therapy targeting these pathways is very promising. Although investigational drugs targeting some cytokines such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-13 have not shown satisfactory efficacy, the development of anti-IPF drugs targeting cytokine and growth factor pathways is still promising. Currently, there are numerous clinical trials investigating the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of IPF and more drugs may be approved based on the results of these trials.

Advances in the field of cytokine and growth factor pathways would help slow disease progression, prolong lives, and improve the quality of life of IPF patients in the future. Therefore, this review tried to provide an overview of cytokines, growth factors, and their signaling pathways in IPF. Furthermore, key information about emerging drugs targeting these pathways for IPF treatment in clinical trials is provided.

Based on the findings of this review, the following points need to be considered in future studies to make strategies targeting these signaling pathways more promising for the treatment of IPF patients. Although upregulating or antagonizing certain cytokine or growth factor signaling pathways alone may not reverse differentiated cells, promoting fibrotic phenotype transition is more promising. Since cytokine and growth factor signaling pathways also play vital roles in other physiological and pathological processes, including damage repair, defense against infection, autoimmune disease, and antitumor immunity, long-term non-selective targeting of these pathways may lead to undesired side effects. Therefore, the identification of more specific targets and the development of drugs having high selectivity on them, the optimization of drug delivery to increase drug concentrations at the target site, and the identification of biomarkers to help select patients who might benefit more from drugs are all worth exploring. In addition, combination therapy with Pirfenidone and Nintedanib might bring better clinical benefits for IPF patients than single drug administration.

One of the novelties of this review is giving an extensive description of the multiple roles of cytokine and growth factor pathways in pulmonary fibrosis, which provide new insights into therapeutic strategies for IPF. These pathways form a complex network in the pathological process of pulmonary fibrosis, and exploring the crosstalk between different signaling cascades may help discover more potential targets. Clinical trials are a critical stage that all approved drugs must go through. Some of the drugs in clinical trials for the treatment of IPF target cytokines and growth factors. Therefore, we summarize key information from these clinical trials and hope to give insights for the development of more effective drug.

Although IPF is idiopathic by definition, it may become less mysterious with progress in the understanding of the pathogenesis of IPF. This review showed that the number of therapeutic targets from cytokine or growth factor signaling pathways and new targeted drugs entering clinical trials is increasing. These advances show that slowing disease progression, prolonging prognosis, and improving quality of life might be possible in the future for patients with IPF.

In conclusion, cytokine and growth factor signaling pathways are indispensable in the pathogenesis of IPF, and this review hopes to provide theoretical support for the development of novel anti-pulmonary fibrosis drugs targeting cytokine and growth factor pathways.

References

• 1

  AgostiniC.GurrieriC. (2006). Chemokine/cytokine Cocktail in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc.3 (4), 357–363. 10.1513/pats.200601-010TK

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AlaviA.HoodJ. D.FraustoR.StupackD. G.ChereshD. A. (2003). Role of Raf in Vascular Protection from Distinct Apoptotic Stimuli. Science301 (5629), 94–96. 10.1126/science.1082015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AllenR. J.Guillen-GuioB.OldhamJ. M.MaS. F.DressenA.PayntonM. L.et al (2020). Genome-Wide Association Study of Susceptibility to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.201 (5), 564–574. 10.1164/rccm.201905-1017OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AmanoH.MatsuiY.HatanakaK.HosonoK.ItoY. (2021). VEGFR1-tyrosine Kinase Signaling in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Inflamm. Regen.41 (1), 16. 10.1186/s41232-021-00166-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AntoniouK. M.PatakaA.BourosD.SiafakasN. M. (2007). Pathogenetic Pathways and Novel Pharmacotherapeutic Targets in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther.20 (5), 453–461. 10.1016/j.pupt.2006.01.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Aoyagi-IkedaK.MaenoT.MatsuiH.UenoM.HaraK.AokiY.et al (2011). Notch Induces Myofibroblast Differentiation of Alveolar Epithelial Cells via Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-Smad3 Pathway. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.45 (1), 136–144. 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0140oc

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AraiT.AbeK.MatsuokaH.YoshidaM.MoriM.GoyaS.et al (2000). Introduction of the Interleukin-10 Gene into Mice Inhibited Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury In Vivo. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.278 (5), L914–L922. 10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.5.L914

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AravamudhanA.HaakA. J.ChoiK. M.MeridewJ. A.CaporarelloN.JonesD. L.et al (2020). TBK1 Regulates YAP/TAZ and Fibrogenic Fibroblast Activation. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.318 (5), L852–l863. 10.1152/ajplung.00324.2019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  BaratellaE.RuaroB.GiudiciF.WadeB.SantagiulianaM.SaltonF.et al (2021). Evaluation of Correlations between Genetic Variants and High-Resolution Computed Tomography Patterns in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Diagnostics11 (5), 762. 10.3390/diagnostics11050762

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BarbarinV.XingZ.DelosM.LisonD.HuauxF. (2005). Pulmonary Overexpression of IL-10 Augments Lung Fibrosis and Th2 Responses Induced by Silica Particles. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.288 (5), L841–L848. 10.1152/ajplung.00329.2004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BarnesJ. C.LumsdenR. V.WorrellJ.CounihanI. P.O'BeirneS. L.BelperioJ. A.et al (2015). CXCR3 Requirement for the Interleukin-13-Mediated Up-Regulation of Interleukin-13Rα2 in Pulmonary Fibroblasts. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.53 (2), 217–225. 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0433OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BarnesJ. W.DuncanD.HeltonS.HutchesonS.KurundkarD.LogsdonN. J.et al (2019). Role of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 and Klotho Cross Talk in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.317 (1), L141–l154. 10.1152/ajplung.00246.2018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BarrattS. L.BlytheT.JarrettC.OurradiK.Shelley-FraserG.DayM. J.et al (2017). Differential Expression of VEGF-Axxx Isoforms Is Critical for Development of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.196 (4), 479–493. 10.1164/rccm.201603-0568OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BarrattS. L.FlowerV. A.PaulingJ. D.MillarA. B. (2018). VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) and Fibrotic Lung Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19 (5). 10.3390/ijms19051269

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BehrJ.KolbM.SongJ. W.LuppiF.SchinzelB.StowasserS.et al (2019). Nintedanib and Sildenafil in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Right Heart Dysfunction. A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial (INSTAGE). Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.200 (12), 1505–1512. 10.1164/rccm.201903-0488OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BesnardA. G.StruyfS.GuabirabaR.FauconnierL.RouxelN.ProostP.et al (2013). CXCL6 Antibody Neutralization Prevents Lung Inflammation and Fibrosis in Mice in the Bleomycin Model. J. Leukoc. Biol.94 (6), 1317–1323. 10.1189/jlb.0313140

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  BetensleyA.SharifR.KaramichosD. (2016). A Systematic Review of the Role of Dysfunctional Wound Healing in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Clin. Med.6 (1). 10.3390/jcm6010002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BoehmeS. A.Franz-BaconK.DiTirroD. N.LyT. W.BaconK. B. (2016). MAP3K19 Is a Novel Regulator of TGF-β Signaling that Impacts Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury and Pulmonary Fibrosis. PLoS One11 (5), e0154874. 10.1371/journal.pone.0154874

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  BrownK. R.EnglandK. M.GossK. L.SnyderJ. M.AcarreguiM. J. (2001). VEGF Induces Airway Epithelial Cell Proliferation in Human Fetal Lung In Vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.281 (4), L1001–L1010. 10.1152/ajplung.2001.281.4.L1001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  ChandaD.OtoupalovaE.SmithS. R.VolckaertT.De LangheS. P.ThannickalV. J. (2019). Developmental Pathways in the Pathogenesis of Lung Fibrosis. Mol. Asp. Med.65, 56–69. 10.1016/j.mam.2018.08.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  ChenH.QuJ.HuangX.KurundkarA.ZhuL.YangN.et al (2016). Mechanosensing by the α6-integrin Confers an Invasive Fibroblast Phenotype and Mediates Lung Fibrosis. Nat. Commun.7, 12564. 10.1038/ncomms12564

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  ChenX.ShiC.CaoH.ChenL.HouJ.XiangZ.et al (2018). The Hedgehog and Wnt/β-Catenin System Machinery Mediate Myofibroblast Differentiation of LR-MSCs in Pulmonary Fibrogenesis. Cell Death Dis.9 (6), 639. 10.1038/s41419-018-0692-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  ChengS. E.LeeI. T.LinC. C.HsiaoL. D.YangC. M. (2014). Thrombin Induces ICAM-1 Expression in Human Lung Epithelial Cells via c-Src/PDGFR/PI3K/Akt-dependent NF-κB/p300 Activation. Clin. Sci. (Lond)127 (3), 171–183. 10.1042/cs20130676

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  ChoiS. (Editor) (2012). “CCN2 CTGF, FISP12, HCS24, SSig-M2, HBGF-0.8, Ecogenin, IGFBP8, IGFBP-rP2,” Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules (New York, NYNew York: Springer), 282. 10.1007/978-3-319-67199-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  ChongS. G.SatoS.KolbM.GauldieJ. (2019). Fibrocytes and Fibroblasts-Where Are We Now. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.116, 105595. 10.1016/j.biocel.2019.105595

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  ChuK. A.YehC. C.KuoF. H.LinW. R.HsuC. W.ChenT. H.et al (2020). Comparison of Reversal of Rat Pulmonary Fibrosis of Nintedanib, Pirfenidone, and Human Umbilical Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Wharton's Jelly. Stem Cell Res. Ther.11 (1), 513. 10.1186/s13287-020-02012-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  CompernolleV.BrusselmansK.AckerT.HoetP.TjwaM.BeckH.et al (2002). Loss of HIF-2alpha and Inhibition of VEGF Impair Fetal Lung Maturation, whereas Treatment with VEGF Prevents Fatal Respiratory Distress in Premature Mice. Nat. Med.8 (7), 702–710. 10.1038/nm721

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  ConteE.GiliE.FagoneE.FrucianoM.IemmoloM.VancheriC. (2014). Effect of Pirfenidone on Proliferation, TGF-β-Induced Myofibroblast Differentiation and Fibrogenic Activity of Primary Human Lung Fibroblasts. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.58, 13–19. 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.02.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  CorteT.BonellaF.CrestaniB.DemedtsM. G.RicheldiL.CoeckC.et al (2015). Safety, Tolerability and Appropriate Use of Nintedanib in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir. Res.16, 116. 10.1186/s12931-015-0276-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  CostabelU.BendstrupE.CottinV.DewintP.EganJ. J.FergusonJ.et al (2014). Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Expert Panel Discussion on the Management of Drug-Related Adverse Events. Adv. Ther.31 (4), 375–391. 10.1007/s12325-014-0112-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  CouttsA.ChenG.StephensN.HirstS.DouglasD.EichholtzT.et al (2001). Release of Biologically Active TGF-Beta from Airway Smooth Muscle Cells Induces Autocrine Synthesis of Collagen. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.280 (5), L999–L1008. 10.1152/ajplung.2001.280.5.L999

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  DerynckR.ZhangY. E. (2003). Smad-dependent and Smad-independent Pathways in TGF-Beta Family Signalling. Nature425 (6958), 577–584. 10.1038/nature02006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  EffendiW. I.NaganoT. (2021). The Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Resurrection Time. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23 (1). 10.3390/ijms23010171

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  EliaszS.LiangS.ChenY.De MarcoM. A.MachekO.SkuchaS.et al (2010). Notch-1 Stimulates Survival of Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells during Hypoxia by Activating the IGF-1R Pathway. Oncogene29 (17), 2488–2498. 10.1038/onc.2010.7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  Epstein ShochetG.BrookE.Bardenstein-WaldB.ShitritD. (2020). TGF-β Pathway Activation by Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Fibroblast Derived Soluble Factors Is Mediated by IL-6 Trans-signaling. Respir. Res.21 (1), 56. 10.1186/s12931-020-1319-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  EspindolaM. S.HabielD. M.NarayananR.JonesI.CoelhoA. L.MurrayL. A.et al (2018). Targeting of TAM Receptors Ameliorates Fibrotic Mechanisms in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.197 (11), 1443–1456. 10.1164/rccm.201707-1519OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  FangY.TianJ.FanY.CaoP. (2020). Latest Progress on the Molecular Mechanisms of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Mol. Biol. Rep.47 (12), 9811–9820. 10.1007/s11033-020-06000-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  FaressJ. A.NetheryD. E.KernE. F.EisenbergR.JaconoF. J.AllenC. L.et al (20071985). Bleomycin-induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Is Attenuated by a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting HER2. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985)103 (6), 2077–2083. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00239.2007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  FlahertyK. R.FellC. D.HugginsJ. T.NunesH.SussmanR.ValenzuelaC.et al (2018). Safety of Nintedanib Added to Pirfenidone Treatment for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J.52 (2). 10.1183/13993003.00230-2018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  FruttigerM. (2008). “VEGF Gene Regulation,” in VEGF in Development (Springer), 30–39.

  • Google Scholar

• 41

  FulkersonP. C.FischettiC. A.RothenbergM. E. (2006). Eosinophils and CCR3 Regulate Interleukin-13 Transgene-Induced Pulmonary Remodeling. Am. J. Pathol.169 (6), 2117–2126. 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060617

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  García-PrietoE.González-LópezA.CabreraS.AstudilloA.Gutiérrez-FernándezA.Fanjul-FernandezM.et al (2010). Resistance to Bleomycin-Induced Lung Fibrosis in MMP-8 Deficient Mice Is Mediated by Interleukin-10. PLoS One5 (10), e13242. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013242

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  GeorgeP. M.WellsA. U.JenkinsR. G. (2020). Pulmonary Fibrosis and COVID-19: the Potential Role for Antifibrotic Therapy. Lancet Respir. Med.8 (8), 807–815. 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30225-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  GerberH. P.DixitV.FerraraN. (1998a). Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Induces Expression of the Antiapoptotic Proteins Bcl-2 and A1 in Vascular Endothelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem.273 (21), 13313–13316. 10.1074/jbc.273.21.13313

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  GerberH. P.McMurtreyA.KowalskiJ.YanM.KeytB. A.DixitV.et al (1998b). Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Regulates Endothelial Cell Survival through the Phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase/Akt Signal Transduction Pathway. Requirement for Flk-1/KDR Activation. J. Biol. Chem.273 (46), 30336–30343. 10.1074/jbc.273.46.30336

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  GuP.WangD.ZhangJ.WangX.ChenZ.GuL.et al (2021). Protective Function of Interleukin-22 in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Clin. Transl. Med.11 (8), e509. 10.1002/ctm2.509

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  GulerS. A.ClarenbachC.BrutscheM.HostettlerK.BrillA. K.SchertelA.et al (2021). Azithromycin for the Treatment of Chronic Cough in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc.18 (12), 2018–2026. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-266OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  GüntherA.KorfeiM.MahavadiP.von der BeckD.RuppertC.MarkartP. (2012). Unravelling the Progressive Pathophysiology of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. Rev.21 (124), 152–160. 10.1183/09059180.00001012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  GuoF.LiJ.DuW.ZhangS.O'ConnorM.ThomasG.et al (2013). mTOR Regulates DNA Damage Response through NF-Κb-Mediated FANCD2 Pathway in Hematopoietic Cells. Leukemia27 (10), 2040–2046. 10.1038/leu.2013.93

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  HaakA. J.DucharmeM. T.Diaz EspinosaA. M.TschumperlinD. J. (2020). Targeting GPCR Signaling for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Therapies. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.41 (3), 172–182. 10.1016/j.tips.2019.12.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  HabielD. M.HogaboamC. (2014). Heterogeneity in Fibroblast Proliferation and Survival in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol.5, 2. 10.3389/fphar.2014.00002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  HamanakaR. B.MutluG. M. (2021). Metabolic Requirements of Pulmonary Fibrosis: Role of Fibroblast Metabolism. Febs J.288 (22), 6331–6352. 10.1111/febs.15693

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  HamblyN.ShimboriC.KolbM. (2015). Molecular Classification of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Personalized Medicine, Genetics and Biomarkers. Respirology20 (7), 1010–1022. 10.1111/resp.12569

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  HanM. K.ZhouY.MurrayS.TayobN.NothI.LamaV. N.et al (2014). Lung Microbiome and Disease Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: an Analysis of the COMET Study. Lancet Respir. Med.2 (7), 548–556. 10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70069-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  HaoX.DuY.QianL.LiD.LiuX. (2017). Upregulation of Long Noncoding RNA AP003419.16 Predicts High Risk of Aging-associated I-diopathic P-ulmonary F-ibrosis. Mol. Med. Rep.16 (6), 8085–8091. 10.3892/mmr.2017.7607

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  HeldinC. H.WestermarkB. (1999). Mechanism of Action and In Vivo Role of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor. Physiol. Rev.79 (4), 1283–1316. 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1283

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  HendersonN. C.RiederF.WynnT. A. (2020). Fibrosis: from Mechanisms to Medicines. Nature587 (7835), 555–566. 10.1038/s41586-020-2938-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  HetzelM.BachemM.AndersD.TrischlerG.FaehlingM. (2005). Different Effects of Growth Factors on Proliferation and Matrix Production of Normal and Fibrotic Human Lung Fibroblasts. Lung183 (4), 225–237. 10.1007/s00408-004-2534-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  HilbergF.RothG. J.KrssakM.KautschitschS.SommergruberW.Tontsch-GruntU.et al (2008). BIBF 1120: Triple Angiokinase Inhibitor with Sustained Receptor Blockade and Good Antitumor Efficacy. Cancer Res.68 (12), 4774–4782. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-07-6307

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  HillC.JonesM. G.DaviesD. E.WangY. (2019). Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition Contributes to Pulmonary Fibrosis via Aberrant Epithelial/fibroblastic Cross-Talk. J. Lung Health Dis.3 (2), 31–35. 10.29245/2689-999x/2019/2.1149

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  HortonM. R.SantopietroV.MathewL.HortonK. M.PolitoA. J.LiuM. C.et al (2012). Thalidomide for the Treatment of Cough in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: a Randomized Trial. Ann. Intern Med.157 (6), 398–406. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  HuangJ.ManningB. D. (2009). A Complex Interplay between Akt, TSC2 and the Two mTOR Complexes. Biochem. Soc. Trans.37 (Pt 1), 217–222. 10.1042/bst0370217

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  HuangL. S.SudhadeviT.FuP.Punathil-KannanP. K.EbenezerD. L.RamchandranR.et al (2020). Sphingosine Kinase 1/S1P Signaling Contributes to Pulmonary Fibrosis by Activating Hippo/YAP Pathway and Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species in Lung Fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21 (6). 10.3390/ijms21062064

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  HuangY.MaS. F.EspindolaM. S.VijR.OldhamJ. M.HuffnagleG. B.et al (2017). Microbes Are Associated with Host Innate Immune Response in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.196 (2), 208–219. 10.1164/rccm.201607-1525OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  HuauxF.Gharaee-KermaniM.LiuT.MorelV.McGarryB.UllenbruchM.et al (2005). Role of Eotaxin-1 (CCL11) and CC Chemokine Receptor 3 (CCR3) in Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury and Fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol.167 (6), 1485–1496. 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61235-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  InomataM.NishiokaY.AzumaA. (2015). Nintedanib: Evidence for its Therapeutic Potential in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Core Evid.10, 89–98. 10.2147/ce.S82905

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  IshidaY.KimuraA.KondoT.HayashiT.UenoM.TakakuraN.et al (2007). Essential Roles of the CC Chemokine Ligand 3-CC Chemokine Receptor 5 axis in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis through Regulation of Macrophage and Fibrocyte Infiltration. Am. J. Pathol.170 (3), 843–854. 10.2353/ajpath.2007.051213

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  IwamotoR.MekadaE.HofmannT. G.Krieghoff-HenningE.KobayashiM.TakamatsuK.et al (2012). “HB-EGF (Heparin-Binding EGF-like Growth Factor),” in Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules. Editor ChoiS. (New York, NY: Springer New York), 849–858. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0461-4_127

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  JoannesA.BrayerS.BesnardV.Marchal-SomméJ.JailletM.MordantP.et al (2016). FGF9 and FGF18 in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Promote Survival and Migration and Inhibit Myofibroblast Differentiation of Human Lung Fibroblasts In Vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.310 (7), L615–L629. 10.1152/ajplung.00185.2015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  JohannsonK. A.StrâmbuI.RavagliaC.GruttersJ. C.ValenzuelaC.MogulkocN.et al (2017). Antacid Therapy in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: More Questions Than Answers?Lancet Respir. Med.5 (7), 591–598. 10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30219-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  JuW.ZhihongY.ZhiyouZ.QinH.DingdingW.LiS.et al (2012). Inhibition of α-SMA by the Ectodomain of FGFR2c Attenuates Lung Fibrosis. Mol. Med.18 (1), 992–1002. 10.2119/molmed.2011.00425

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  KarampitsakosT.WoolardT.BourosD.TzouvelekisA. (2017). Toll-like Receptors in the Pathogenesis of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. J. Pharmacol.808, 35–43. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.06.045

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  KarmanJ.WangJ.BodeaC.CaoS.LevesqueM. C. (2021). Lung Gene Expression and Single Cell Analyses Reveal Two Subsets of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Patients Associated with Different Pathogenic Mechanisms. PLoS One16 (3), e0248889. 10.1371/journal.pone.0248889

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  KasuyaY.KimJ. D.HatanoM.TatsumiK.MatsudaS. (2021). Pathophysiological Roles of Stress-Activated Protein Kinases in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (11). 10.3390/ijms22116041

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  KatohM. (2018). “FGF (Fibroblast Growth Factor),” in Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules. Editor ChoiS. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 1697–1702. 10.1007/978-3-319-67199-4_313

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  KawamuraK.IchikadoK.YasudaY.AnanK.SugaM. (2017). Azithromycin for Idiopathic Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: a Retrospective Single-Center Study. BMC Pulm. Med.17 (1), 94. 10.1186/s12890-017-0437-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  KeatingG. M. (2015). Nintedanib: A Review of its Use in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Drugs75 (10), 1131–1140. 10.1007/s40265-015-0418-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  KellyM.KolbM.BonniaudP.GauldieJ. (2003). Re-evaluation of Fibrogenic Cytokines in Lung Fibrosis. Curr. Pharm. Des.9 (1), 39–49. 10.2174/1381612033392341

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  KhalilN.XuY. D.O'ConnorR.DuronioV. (2005). Proliferation of Pulmonary Interstitial Fibroblasts Is Mediated by Transforming Growth Factor-Beta1-Induced Release of Extracellular Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 and Phosphorylation of P38 MAPK and JNK. J. Biol. Chem.280 (52), 43000–43009. 10.1074/jbc.M510441200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  KimM. S.BaekA. R.LeeJ. H.JangA. S.KimD. J.ChinS. S.et al (2019). IL-37 Attenuates Lung Fibrosis by Inducing Autophagy and Regulating TGF-Β1 Production in Mice. J. Immunol.203 (8), 2265–2275. 10.4049/jimmunol.1801515

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  KimS.LimJ. H.WooC. H. (2020). Therapeutic Potential of Targeting Kinase Inhibition in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Yeungnam Univ. J. Med.37 (4), 269–276. 10.12701/yujm.2020.00458

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  KingT. E.Jr.BradfordW. Z.Castro-BernardiniS.FaganE. A.GlaspoleI.GlassbergM. K.et al (2014). A Phase 3 Trial of Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med.370 (22), 2083–2092. 10.1056/NEJMoa1402582

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  KingT. E.Jr.BrownK. K.RaghuG.du BoisR. M.LynchD. A.MartinezF.et al (2011a). BUILD-3: a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Bosentan in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.184 (1), 92–99. 10.1164/rccm.201011-1874OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  KingT. E.Jr.PardoA.SelmanM. (2011b). Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Lancet378 (9807), 1949–1961. 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60052-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  KiyokawaH.MorimotoM. (2020). Notch Signaling in the Mammalian Respiratory System, Specifically the Trachea and Lungs, in Development, Homeostasis, Regeneration, and Disease. Dev. Growth Differ.62 (1), 67–79. 10.1111/dgd.12628

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  KohanM.PuxedduI.ReichR.Levi-SchafferF.BerkmanN. (2010). Eotaxin-2/CCL24 and eotaxin-3/CCL26 Exert Differential Profibrogenic Effects on Human Lung Fibroblasts. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol.104 (1), 66–72. 10.1016/j.anai.2009.11.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  KönigshoffM.KramerM.BalsaraN.WilhelmJ.AmarieO. V.JahnA.et al (2009). WNT1-inducible Signaling Protein-1 Mediates Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice and Is Upregulated in Humans with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest119 (4), 772–787. 10.1172/jci33950

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  KooH. Y.El-BazL. M.HouseS.CilvikS. N.DorryS. J.ShoukryN. M.et al (2018). Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Decreases Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis and Inhibits Fibroblast Collagen Production and Myofibroblast Differentiation. J. Pathol.246 (1), 54–66. 10.1002/path.5106

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  KortekaasR. K.BurgessJ. K.van OrsoyR.LambD.WebsterM.GosensR. (2021). Therapeutic Targeting of IL-11 for Chronic Lung Disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.42 (5), 354–366. 10.1016/j.tips.2021.01.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  KorthagenN. M.van MoorselC. H.KazemierK. M.RuvenH. J.GruttersJ. C. (2012). IL1RN Genetic Variations and Risk of IPF: a Meta-Analysis and mRNA Expression Study. Immunogenetics64 (5), 371–377. 10.1007/s00251-012-0604-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  KreuterM.WuytsW.RenzoniE.KoschelD.MaherT. M.KolbM.et al (2016). Antacid Therapy and Disease Outcomes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: a Pooled Analysis. Lancet Respir. Med.4 (5), 381–389. 10.1016/s2213-2600(16)00067-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  KuhnH.KrügerS.HammerschmidtS.WirtzH. (2010). High Concentrations of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Reduce Stretch-Induced Apoptosis of Alveolar Type II Cells. Respirology15 (2), 343–348. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01701.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  LawrenceJ.NhoR. (2018). The Role of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19 (3). 10.3390/ijms19030778

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  LedererD. J.MartinezF. J. (2018). Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med.378 (19), 1811–1823. 10.1056/NEJMra1705751

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  LeeE. G.LeeT. H.HongY.RyooJ.HeoJ. W.GilB. M.et al (2021). Effects of Low-Dose Pirfenidone on Survival and Lung Function Decline in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF): Results from a Real-World Study. PLoS One16 (12), e0261684. 10.1371/journal.pone.0261684

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  LeeJ. S.CollardH. R.AnstromK. J.MartinezF. J.NothI.RobertsR. S.et al (2013). Anti-acid Treatment and Disease Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: an Analysis of Data from Three Randomised Controlled Trials. Lancet Respir. Med.1 (5), 369–376. 10.1016/s2213-2600(13)70105-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  LeeJ. S.RyuJ. H.ElickerB. M.LydellC. P.JonesK. D.WoltersP. J.et al (2011). Gastroesophageal Reflux Therapy Is Associated with Longer Survival in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.184 (12), 1390–1394. 10.1164/rccm.201101-0138OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  LiH.ZhaoC.TianY.LuJ.ZhangG.LiangS.et al (2020). Src Family Kinases and Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Review. Biomed. Pharmacother.127, 110183. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110183

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  LiL.LiQ.WeiL.WangZ.MaW.LiuF.et al (2019). Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 14 Contributes to Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Fibrogenesis in Mouse L929 Fibroblasts via Modulating PPM1A. J. Cell Biochem.120 (8), 13372–13381. 10.1002/jcb.28612

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  LiX.ErikssonU. (2003). Novel PDGF Family Members: PDGF-C and PDGF-D. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.14 (2), 91–98. 10.1016/s1359-6101(02)00090-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  LiY.JiangD.LiangJ.MeltzerE. B.GrayA.MiuraR.et al (2011). Severe Lung Fibrosis Requires an Invasive Fibroblast Phenotype Regulated by Hyaluronan and CD44. J. Exp. Med.208 (7), 1459–1471. 10.1084/jem.20102510

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  LiangJ.LiuN.LiuX.MenaJ. M.XieT.GengY.et al (2019). Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase-Activated Protein Kinase 2 Inhibition Attenuates Fibroblast Invasion and Severe Lung Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.60 (1), 41–48. 10.1165/rcmb.2018-0033OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  LipsonK. E.WongC.TengY.SpongS. (2012). CTGF Is a Central Mediator of Tissue Remodeling and Fibrosis and its Inhibition Can Reverse the Process of Fibrosis. Fibrogenes. Tissue Repair5 (Suppl. 1), S24. 10.1186/1755-1536-5-s1-s24

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  LiuS.Shi-wenX.AbrahamD. J.LeaskA. (2011). CCN2 Is Required for Bleomycin-Induced Skin Fibrosis in Mice. Arthritis Rheum.63 (1), 239–246. 10.1002/art.30074

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  LiuY. M.NepaliK.LiouJ. P. (2017). Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Current Status, Recent Progress, and Emerging Targets. J. Med. Chem.60 (2), 527–553. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00935

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  LoboP. (2016). Nintedanib Data Challenge IPF Guidelines. Lancet Respir. Med.4 (8), 610. 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30196-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  LoetscherP.UguccioniM.BordoliL.BaggioliniM.MoserB.ChizzoliniC.et al (1998). CCR5 Is Characteristic of Th1 Lymphocytes. Nature391 (6665), 344–345. 10.1038/34814

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  MaedaA.HiyamaK.YamakidoH.IshiokaS.YamakidoM. (1996). Increased Expression of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor A and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I in BAL Cells during the Development of Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice. Chest109 (3), 780–786. 10.1378/chest.109.3.780

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  MarijicP.SchwarzkopfL.SchwettmannL.RuhnkeT.TrudzinskiF.KreuterM. (2021). Pirfenidone vs. Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: a Retrospective Cohort Study. Respir. Res.22 (1), 268. 10.1186/s12931-021-01857-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  Martin-MedinaA.LehmannM.BurgyO.HermannS.BaarsmaH. A.WagnerD. E.et al (2018). Increased Extracellular Vesicles Mediate WNT5A Signaling in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.198 (12), 1527–1538. 10.1164/rccm.201708-1580OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  MartinezF. J.YowE.FlahertyK. R.SnyderL. D.DurheimM. T.WisniewskiS. R.et al (2021). Effect of Antimicrobial Therapy on Respiratory Hospitalization or Death in Adults with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: The CleanUP-IPF Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama325 (18), 1841–1851. 10.1001/jama.2021.4956

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  MeiQ.LiuZ.ZuoH.YangZ.QuJ. (2021). Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Update on Pathogenesis. Front. Pharmacol.12, 797292. 10.3389/fphar.2021.797292

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  MeltzerE. B.NobleP. W. (2008). Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Orphanet J. Rare Dis.3, 8. 10.1186/1750-1172-3-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  MilaraJ.HernandezG.BallesterB.MorellA.RogerI.MonteroP.et al (2018). The JAK2 Pathway Is Activated in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir. Res.19 (1), 24. 10.1186/s12931-018-0728-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  MolyneauxP. L.CoxM. J.Willis-OwenS. A.MalliaP.RussellK. E.RussellA. M.et al (2014). The Role of Bacteria in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.190 (8), 906–913. 10.1164/rccm.201403-0541OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  MolyneauxP. L.Willis-OwenS. A. G.CoxM. J.JamesP.CowmanS.LoebingerM.et al (2017). Host-Microbial Interactions in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.195 (12), 1640–1650. 10.1164/rccm.201607-1408OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  MonteroP.MilaraJ.RogerI.CortijoJ. (2021). Role of JAK/STAT in Interstitial Lung Diseases; Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (12). 10.3390/ijms22126211

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  MoodleyY. P.MissoN. L.ScaffidiA. K.Fogel-PetrovicM.McAnultyR. J.LaurentG. J.et al (2003). Inverse Effects of Interleukin-6 on Apoptosis of Fibroblasts from Pulmonary Fibrosis and Normal Lungs. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.29 (4), 490–498. 10.1165/rcmb.2002-0262OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  MooneyJ.ReddyS. R.ChangE.BroderM. S.GokhaleS.CorralM. (2021). Antifibrotic Therapies Reduce Mortality and Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Manag. Care Spec. Pharm.27 (12), 1724–1733. 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1724

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  MooreB. B.PaineR.3rdChristensenP. J.MooreT. A.SitterdingS.NganR.et al (2001). Protection from Pulmonary Fibrosis in the Absence of CCR2 Signaling. J. Immunol.167 (8), 4368–4377. 10.4049/jimmunol.167.8.4368

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  MossB. J.RyterS. W.RosasI. O. (2022). Pathogenic Mechanisms Underlying Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Annu. Rev. Pathol.17, 515–546. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042320-030240

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  MuraM.HanB.AndradeC. F.SethR.HwangD.WaddellT. K.et al (2006). The Early Responses of VEGF and its Receptors during Acute Lung Injury: Implication of VEGF in Alveolar Epithelial Cell Survival. Crit. Care10 (5), R130. 10.1186/cc5042

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  Murphy-UllrichJ. E.SutoM. J. (2018). Thrombospondin-1 Regulation of Latent TGF-β Activation: A Therapeutic Target for Fibrotic Disease. Matrix Biol.68-69, 28–43. 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.12.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  MurrayL. A.ArgentieriR. L.FarrellF. X.BrachtM.ShengH.WhitakerB.et al (2008). Hyper-responsiveness of IPF/UIP Fibroblasts: Interplay between TGFbeta1, IL-13 and CCL2. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.40 (10), 2174–2182. 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.02.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  NakagomeK.DohiM.OkunishiK.TanakaR.MiyazakiJ.YamamotoK. (2006). In Vivo IL-10 Gene Delivery Attenuates Bleomycin Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Inhibiting the Production and Activation of TGF-Beta in the Lung. Thorax61 (10), 886–894. 10.1136/thx.2005.056317

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  NathanS. D.CostabelU.AlberaC.BehrJ.WuytsW. A.KirchgaesslerK. U.et al (2019). Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and More Advanced Lung Function Impairment. Respir. Med.153, 44–51. 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.04.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  NgB.DongJ.D'AgostinoG.ViswanathanS.WidjajaA. A.LimW. W.et al (2019). Interleukin-11 Is a Therapeutic Target in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med.11 (511). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw1237

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  NinouI.MagkriotiC.AidinisV. (2018). Autotaxin in Pathophysiology and Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front. Med. (Lausanne)5, 180. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00180

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  NishiokaY.AzumaM.KishiM.AonoY. (2013). Targeting Platelet-Derived Growth Factor as a Therapeutic Approach in Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Med. Invest60 (3-4), 175–183. 10.2152/jmi.60.175

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  NobleP. W.AlberaC.BradfordW. Z.CostabelU.GlassbergM. K.KardatzkeD.et al (2011). Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (CAPACITY): Two Randomised Trials. Lancet377 (9779), 1760–1769. 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60405-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  NobleP. W.BarkauskasC. E.JiangD. (2012). Pulmonary Fibrosis: Patterns and Perpetrators. J. Clin. Invest122 (8), 2756–2762. 10.1172/jci60323

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  NothI.ZhangY.MaS. F.FloresC.BarberM.HuangY.et al (2013). Genetic Variants Associated with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Susceptibility and Mortality: a Genome-wide Association Study. Lancet Respir. Med.1 (4), 309–317. 10.1016/s2213-2600(13)70045-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  O'DwyerD. N.ArmstrongM. E.TrujilloG.CookeG.KeaneM. P.FallonP. G.et al (2013). The Toll-like Receptor 3 L412F Polymorphism and Disease Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.188 (12), 1442–1450. 10.1164/rccm.201304-0760OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  OkuH.NakazatoH.HorikawaT.TsurutaY.SuzukiR. (2002). Pirfenidone Suppresses Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha, Enhances Interleukin-10 and Protects Mice from Endotoxic Shock. Eur. J. Pharmacol.446 (1-3), 167–176. 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01757-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  OngC. H.ThamC. L.HarithH. H.FirdausN.IsrafD. A. (2021). TGF-β-induced Fibrosis: A Review on the Underlying Mechanism and Potential Therapeutic Strategies. Eur. J. Pharmacol.911, 174510. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174510

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  OrnitzD. M.ItohN. (2022). New Developments in the Biology of Fibroblast Growth Factors. WIREs Mech. Dis.e1549, e1549. 10.1002/wsbm.1549

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  PanL. H.YamauchiK.UzukiM.NakanishiT.TakigawaM.InoueH.et al (2001). Type II Alveolar Epithelial Cells and Interstitial Fibroblasts Express Connective Tissue Growth Factor in IPF. Eur. Respir. J.17 (6), 1220–1227. 10.1183/09031936.01.00074101

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  PapirisS. A.TomosI. P.KarakatsaniA.SpathisA.KorbilaI.AnalitisA.et al (2018). High Levels of IL-6 and IL-8 Characterize Early-On Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Acute Exacerbations. Cytokine102, 168–172. 10.1016/j.cyto.2017.08.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  PassalacquaG.MincariniM.ColomboD.TroisiG.FerrariM.BagnascoD.et al (2017). IL-13 and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Possible Links and New Therapeutic Strategies. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther.45, 95–100. 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.05.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  PechkovskyD. V.ScaffidiA. K.HackettT. L.BallardJ.ShaheenF.ThompsonP. J.et al (2008). Transforming Growth Factor Beta1 Induces Alphavbeta3 Integrin Expression in Human Lung Fibroblasts via a Beta3 Integrin-, C-Src-, and P38 MAPK-dependent Pathway. J. Biol. Chem.283 (19), 12898–12908. 10.1074/jbc.M708226200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  PhanT. H. G.PaliogiannisP.NasrallahG. K.GiordoR.EidA. H.FoisA. G.et al (2021). Emerging Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Cell Mol. Life Sci.78 (5), 2031–2057. 10.1007/s00018-020-03693-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  PhillipsR. J.BurdickM. D.HongK.LutzM. A.MurrayL. A.XueY. Y.et al (2004). Circulating Fibrocytes Traffic to the Lungs in Response to CXCL12 and Mediate Fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest114 (3), 438–446. 10.1172/jci20997

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  PignattiP.BrunettiG.MorettoD.YacoubM. R.FioriM.BalbiB.et al (2006). Role of the Chemokine Receptors CXCR3 and CCR4 in Human Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.173 (3), 310–317. 10.1164/rccm.200502-244OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  PitreT.KhalidM. F.CuiS.ZhangM. C.HusnudinovR.MahJ.et al (2022). Sildenafil for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther.73-74, 102128. 10.1016/j.pupt.2022.102128

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  PuxedduI.BaderR.PiliponskyA. M.ReichR.Levi-SchafferF.BerkmanN. (2006). The CC Chemokine eotaxin/CCL11 Has a Selective Profibrogenic Effect on Human Lung Fibroblasts. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.117 (1), 103–110. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.057

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  QianW.CaiX.QianQ.ZhangW.TianL. (2020). Metastasis-associated Protein 1 Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis by Up-Regulating Snail Expression. J. Cell Mol. Med.24 (11), 5998–6007. 10.1111/jcmm.15062

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  QiuT.TianY.GaoY.MaM.LiH.LiuX.et al (2019). PTEN Loss Regulates Alveolar Epithelial Cell Senescence in Pulmonary Fibrosis Depending on Akt Activation. Aging (Albany NY)11 (18), 7492–7509. 10.18632/aging.102262

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  RaghuG.AmattoV. C.BehrJ.StowasserS. (2015). Comorbidities in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients: a Systematic Literature Review. Eur. Respir. J.46 (4), 1113–1130. 10.1183/13993003.02316-2014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  RaghuG.PellegriniC. A.YowE.FlahertyK. R.MeyerK.NothI.et al (2018). Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (WRAP-IPF): a Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Phase 2 Trial. Lancet Respir. Med.6 (9), 707–714. 10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30301-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  RaghuG.ScholandM. B.de AndradeJ.LancasterL.MagetoY.GoldinJ.et al (2016). FG-3019 Anti-connective Tissue Growth Factor Monoclonal Antibody: Results of an Open-Label Clinical Trial in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J.47 (5), 1481–1491. 10.1183/13993003.01030-2015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  RahamanS. O.GroveL. M.ParuchuriS.SouthernB. D.AbrahamS.NieseK. A.et al (2014). TRPV4 Mediates Myofibroblast Differentiation and Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice. J. Clin. Invest124 (12), 5225–5238. 10.1172/jci75331

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  RamosC.BecerrilC.MontañoM.García-De-AlbaC.RamírezR.ChecaM.et al (2010). FGF-1 Reverts Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by TGF-{beta}1 through MAPK/ERK Kinase Pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.299 (2), L222–L231. 10.1152/ajplung.00070.2010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  RaoL. Z.WangY.ZhangL.WuG.ZhangL.WangF. X.et al (2021). IL-24 Deficiency Protects Mice against Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Repressing IL-4-induced M2 Program in Macrophages. Cell Death Differ.28 (4), 1270–1283. 10.1038/s41418-020-00650-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  ReilkoffR. A.PengH.MurrayL. A.PengX.RussellT.MontgomeryR.et al (2013). Semaphorin 7a+ Regulatory T Cells Are Associated with Progressive Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Are Implicated in Transforming Growth Factor-Β1-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.187 (2), 180–188. 10.1164/rccm.201206-1109OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  RiceA. B.MoomawC. R.MorganD. L.BonnerJ. C. (1999). Specific Inhibitors of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor or Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Reduce Pulmonary Fibrosis in Rats. Am. J. Pathol.155 (1), 213–221. 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65115-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  RicheldiL.du BoisR. M.RaghuG.AzumaA.BrownK. K.CostabelU.et al (2014). Efficacy and Safety of Nintedanib in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med.370 (22), 2071–2082. 10.1056/NEJMoa1402584

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  RicheldiL.KolbM.JouneauS.WuytsW. A.SchinzelB.StowasserS.et al (2020). Efficacy and Safety of Nintedanib in Patients with Advanced Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. BMC Pulm. Med.20 (1), 3. 10.1186/s12890-019-1030-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  Rivas-FuentesS.HerreraI.Salgado-AguayoA.Buendía-RoldánI.BecerrilC.CisnerosJ. (2020). CX3CL1 and CX3CR1 Could Be a Relevant Molecular axis in the Pathophysiology of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Int. J. Med. Sci.17 (15), 2357–2361. 10.7150/ijms.43748

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  RobbinsD. J.FeiD. L.RioboN. A. (2012). The Hedgehog Signal Transduction Network. Sci. Signal5 (246), re6. 10.1126/scisignal.2002906

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  RobertsJ. R.PerkinsG. D.FujisawaT.PettigrewK. A.GaoF.AhmedA.et al (2007). Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Promotes Physical Wound Repair and Is Anti-apoptotic in Primary Distal Lung Epithelial and A549 Cells. Crit. Care Med.35 (9), 2164–2170. 10.1097/01.ccm.0000281451.73202.f6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  RockJ. R.BarkauskasC. E.CronceM. J.XueY.HarrisJ. R.LiangJ.et al (2011). Multiple Stromal Populations Contribute to Pulmonary Fibrosis without Evidence for Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108 (52), E1475–E1483. 10.1073/pnas.1117988108

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  RoseC. E.Jr.SungS. S.FuS. M. (2003). Significant Involvement of CCL2 (MCP-1) in Inflammatory Disorders of the Lung. Microcirculation10 (3-4), 273–288. 10.1038/sj.mn.7800193

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  SaitoA.HorieM.NagaseT. (2018). TGF-β Signaling in Lung Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19 (8). 10.3390/ijms19082460

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  SaitoM.MitaniA.IshimoriT.MiyashitaN.IsagoH.MikamiY.et al (2020). Active mTOR in Lung Epithelium Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Enhances Lung Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.62 (6), 699–708. 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0255OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  SaltonF.RuaroB.ConfalonieriP.ConfalonieriM. (2020). Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition: A Major Pathogenic Driver in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis?Med. Kaunas.56 (11). 10.3390/medicina56110608

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  SavarinoE.CarboneR.MarabottoE.FurnariM.SconfienzaL.GhioM.et al (2013). Gastro-oesophageal Reflux and Gastric Aspiration in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients. Eur. Respir. J.42 (5), 1322–1331. 10.1183/09031936.00101212

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  SchaeferC. J.RuhrmundD. W.PanL.SeiwertS. D.KossenK. (2011). Antifibrotic Activities of Pirfenidone in Animal Models. Eur. Respir. Rev.20 (120), 85–97. 10.1183/09059180.00001111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  SelmanM.PardoA. (2014). Revealing the Pathogenic and Aging-Related Mechanisms of the Enigmatic Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Integral Model. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.189 (10), 1161–1172. 10.1164/rccm.201312-2221PP

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  ShenderovK.CollinsS. L.PowellJ. D.HortonM. R. (2021). Immune Dysregulation as a Driver of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest131 (2). 10.1172/jci143226

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  ShimboriC.BellayeP. S.XiaJ.GauldieJ.AskK.RamosC.et al (2016). Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 Attenuates TGF-Β1-Induced Lung Fibrosis. J. Pathol.240 (2), 197–210. 10.1002/path.4768

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  SingerD.BengtsonL. G. S.ConoscentiC. S.AndersonA. J.BrekkeL.ShettyS. S.et al (2022). Impact of Timing of Nintedanib Initiation Among Patients Newly Diagnosed with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Med. Econ.25, 532–540. 10.1080/13696998.2022.2054203

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  SkibbaM.DrelichA.PoellmannM.HongS.BrasierA. R. (2020). Nanoapproaches to Modifying Epigenetics of Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition for Treatment of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol.11, 607689. 10.3389/fphar.2020.607689

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  SpagnoloP.TzouvelekisA.BonellaF. (2018). The Management of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front. Med. (Lausanne)5, 148. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  StrieterR. M. (2005). Pathogenesis and Natural History of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia: the Whole Story or the Last Chapter of a Long Novel. Chest128 (5 Suppl. 1), 526s–532s. 10.1378/chest.128.5_suppl_1.526S

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  SuJ.MorganiS. M.DavidC. J.WangQ.ErE. E.HuangY. H.et al (2020). TGF-β Orchestrates Fibrogenic and Developmental EMTs via the RAS Effector RREB1. Nature577 (7791), 566–571. 10.1038/s41586-019-1897-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  Suarez-CuartinG.Molina-MolinaM. (2019). Assessing Quality of Life of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients: the INSTAGE Study. Breathe (Sheff)15 (2), 144–146. 10.1183/20734735.0016-2019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  SunM.SunY.FengZ.KangX.YangW.WangY.et al (2021). New Insights into the Hippo/YAP Pathway in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Pharmacol. Res.169, 105635. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105635

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  SuryadevaraV.RamchandranR.KampD. W.NatarajanV. (2020). Lipid Mediators Regulate Pulmonary Fibrosis: Potential Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21 (12). 10.3390/ijms21124257

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  TagerA. M.LaCameraP.SheaB. S.CampanellaG. S.SelmanM.ZhaoZ.et al (2008). The Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor LPA1 Links Pulmonary Fibrosis to Lung Injury by Mediating Fibroblast Recruitment and Vascular Leak. Nat. Med.14 (1), 45–54. 10.1038/nm1685

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  TakeharaK.KogaY.HachisuY.UtsugiM.SawadaY.SaitoY.et al (2022). Differential Discontinuation Profiles between Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Cells11 (1). 10.3390/cells11010143

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  TanakaY.HinoM.GemmaA. (2017). Potential Benefit of Bosentan Therapy in Borderline or Less Severe Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-An Interim Analysis of Results from a Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study. BMC Pulm. Med.17 (1), 200. 10.1186/s12890-017-0523-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  TaniguchiH.EbinaM.KondohY.OguraT.AzumaA.SugaM.et al (2010). Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J.35 (4), 821–829. 10.1183/09031936.00005209

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  TranT.AssayagD.ErnstP.SuissaS. (2021). Effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Chest159 (2), 673–682. 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2080

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  TsubouchiK.ArayaJ.KuwanoK. (2018). PINK1-PARK2-mediated Mitophagy in COPD and IPF Pathogeneses. Inflamm. Regen.38, 18. 10.1186/s41232-018-0077-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  TzavlakiK.MoustakasA. (2020). TGF-β Signaling. Biomolecules10 (3). 10.3390/biom10030487

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  TzouvelekisA.NtoliosP.KaramerisA.VilarasG.BoglouP.KoulelidisA.et al (2013). Increased Expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGF-R) in Patients with Different Forms of Lung Fibrosis. Biomed. Res. Int.2013, 654354. 10.1155/2013/654354

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  UlsamerA.WeiY.KimK. K.TanK.WheelerS.XiY.et al (2012). Axin Pathway Activity Regulates In Vivo pY654-β-Catenin Accumulation and Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem.287 (7), 5164–5172. 10.1074/jbc.M111.322123

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  VancheriC.KreuterM.RicheldiL.RyersonC. J.ValeyreD.GruttersJ. C.et al (2018). Nintedanib with Add-On Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Results of the INJOURNEY Trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.197 (3), 356–363. 10.1164/rccm.201706-1301OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  VaretJ.DouglasS. K.GilmartinL.MedfordA. R.BatesD. O.HarperS. J.et al (2010). VEGF in the Lung: a Role for Novel Isoforms. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.298 (6), L768–L774. 10.1152/ajplung.00353.2009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  VillavicencioM. A.AxtellA. L.OshoA.AstorT.RoyN.MelnitchoukS.et al (2018). Single- versus Double-Lung Transplantation in Pulmonary Fibrosis: Impact of Age and Pulmonary Hypertension. Ann. Thorac. Surg.106 (3), 856–863. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.060

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  WalshJ.AbsherM.KelleyJ. (1993). Variable Expression of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Family Proteins in Acute Lung Injury. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.9 (6), 637–644. 10.1165/ajrcmb/9.6.637

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  WangQ.UsingerW.NicholsB.GrayJ.XuL.SeeleyT. W.et al (2011). Cooperative Interaction of CTGF and TGF-β in Animal Models of Fibrotic Disease. Fibrogenes. Tissue Repair4 (1), 4. 10.1186/1755-1536-4-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  WangQ.XieZ. L.WuQ.JinZ. X.YangC.FengJ. (2021). Role of Various Imbalances Centered on Alveolar Epithelial Cell/fibroblast Apoptosis Imbalance in the Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Chin. Med. J. Engl.134 (3), 261–274. 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001288

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  WangT.LiuY.ZouJ. F.ChengZ. S. (2017). Interleukin-17 Induces Human Alveolar Epithelial to Mesenchymal Cell Transition via the TGF-Β1 Mediated Smad2/3 and ERK1/2 Activation. PLoS One12 (9), e0183972. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183972

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  WhyteM.HubbardR.MeliconiR.WhidborneM.EatonV.BingleC.et al (2000). Increased Risk of Fibrosing Alveolitis Associated with Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Gene Polymorphisms. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.162 (2 Pt 1), 755–758. 10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9909053

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  WilsonM. S.MadalaS. K.RamalingamT. R.GochuicoB. R.RosasI. O.CheeverA. W.et al (2010). Bleomycin and IL-1beta-mediated Pulmonary Fibrosis Is IL-17A Dependent. J. Exp. Med.207 (3), 535–552. 10.1084/jem.20092121

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  WilsonM. S.WynnT. A. (2009). Pulmonary Fibrosis: Pathogenesis, Etiology and Regulation. Mucosal Immunol.2 (2), 103–121. 10.1038/mi.2008.85

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  WoodcockH. V.EleyJ. D.GuillotinD.PlatéM.NanthakumarC. B.MartufiM.et al (2019). The mTORC1/4E-BP1 axis Represents a Critical Signaling Node during Fibrogenesis. Nat. Commun.10 (1), 6. 10.1038/s41467-018-07858-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  WuH.YuY.HuangH.HuY.FuS.WangZ.et al (2020). Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis Is Caused by Elevated Mechanical Tension on Alveolar Stem Cells. Cell180 (1), 107–e17. e117. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  WuJ.ChuX.ChenC.BellusciS. (2018). Role of Fibroblast Growth Factor 10 in Mesenchymal Cell Differentiation during Lung Development and Disease. Front. Genet.9, 545. 10.3389/fgene.2018.00545

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  WuW.QiuL.WuJ.LiuX.ZhangG. (2021). Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. BMJ Open11 (12), e050004. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  WynesM. W.FrankelS. K.RichesD. W. (2004). IL-4-induced Macrophage-Derived IGF-I Protects Myofibroblasts from Apoptosis Following Growth Factor Withdrawal. J. Leukoc. Biol.76 (5), 1019–1027. 10.1189/jlb.0504288

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  XuQ.LiuY.PanH.XuT.LiY.YuanJ.et al (2019). Aberrant Expression of miR-125a-3p Promotes Fibroblast Activation via Fyn/STAT3 Pathway during Silica-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Toxicology414, 57–67. 10.1016/j.tox.2019.01.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  XuX.ZhangJ.DaiH. (2020). IL-25/IL-33/TSLP Contributes to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Do Alveolar Epithelial Cells and (Myo)fibroblasts Matter?Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood)245 (10), 897–901. 10.1177/1535370220915428

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205

  XylourgidisN.MinK.AhangariF.YuG.Herazo-MayaJ. D.KarampitsakosT.et al (2019). Role of Dual-Specificity Protein Phosphatase DUSP10/MKP-5 in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.317 (5), L678–l689. 10.1152/ajplung.00264.2018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  YagihashiK.HuckleberryJ.ColbyT. V.TazelaarH. D.ZachJ.SundaramB.et al (2016). Radiologic-pathologic Discordance in Biopsy-Proven Usual Interstitial Pneumonia. Eur. Respir. J.47 (4), 1189–1197. 10.1183/13993003.01680-2015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207

  YanZ.KuiZ.PingZ. (2014). Reviews and Prospectives of Signaling Pathway Analysis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Autoimmun. Rev.13 (10), 1020–1025. 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.08.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  YangD.ChenX.WangJ.LouQ.LouY.LiL.et al (2019). Dysregulated Lung Commensal Bacteria Drive Interleukin-17B Production to Promote Pulmonary Fibrosis through Their Outer Membrane Vesicles. Immunity50 (3), 692–e7. e697. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.02.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 209

  YangL.HerreraJ.GilbertsenA.XiaH.SmithK.BenyumovA.et al (2018). IL-8 Mediates Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell Fibrogenicity. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.314 (1), L127–l136. 10.1152/ajplung.00200.2017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210

  YangL.ZhouF.ZhengD.WangD.LiX.ZhaoC.et al (2021). FGF/FGFR Signaling: From Lung Development to Respiratory Diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.62, 94–104. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2021.09.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 211

  YinY.WhiteA. C.HuhS. H.HiltonM. J.KanazawaH.LongF.et al (2008). An FGF-WNT Gene Regulatory Network Controls Lung Mesenchyme Development. Dev. Biol.319 (2), 426–436. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.04.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 212

  YogoY.FujishimaS.InoueT.SaitoF.ShiomiT.YamaguchiK.et al (2009). Macrophage Derived Chemokine (CCL22), Thymus and Activation-Regulated Chemokine (CCL17), and CCR4 in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir. Res.10 (1), 80. 10.1186/1465-9921-10-80

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  YomboD. J. K.OdayarV.GuptaN.JeggaA. G.MadalaS. K. (2021). The Protective Effects of IL-31RA Deficiency during Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front. Immunol.12, 645717. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.645717

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 214

  YoshinouchiT.NaniwaT.ShimizuS.OhtsukiY.FujitaJ.SatoS.et al (2007). Expression of Chemokine Receptors CXCR3 and CCR4 in Lymphocytes of Idiopathic Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia. Respir. Med.101 (6), 1258–1264. 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.10.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 215

  ZhangJ.WangD.WangL.WangS.RodenA. C.ZhaoH.et al (2019a). Profibrotic Effect of IL-17A and Elevated IL-17RA in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Lung Disease Support a Direct Role for IL-17A/IL-17RA in Human Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.316 (3), L487–l497. 10.1152/ajplung.00301.2018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  ZhangL. M.ZhangJ.ZhangY.FeiC.WangL.YiZ. W.et al (2019b). Interleukin-18 Promotes Fibroblast Senescence in Pulmonary Fibrosis through Down-Regulating Klotho Expression. Biomed. Pharmacother.113, 108756. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108756

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  ZhangS.YuD.WangM.HuangT.WuH.ZhangY.et al (2018). FGF21 Attenuates Pulmonary Fibrogenesis through Ameliorating Oxidative Stress In Vivo and In Vitro. Biomed. Pharmacother.103, 1516–1525. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.100

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 218

  ZhouY.HuangX.HeckerL.KurundkarD.KurundkarA.LiuH.et al (2013). Inhibition of Mechanosensitive Signaling in Myofibroblasts Ameliorates Experimental Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest123 (3), 1096–1108. 10.1172/jci66700

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 219

  ZhuX.FangX.ChenW.HanF.HuangZ.LuoB.et al (2017). Lower Expression of Platelet Derived Growth Factor Is Associated with Better Overall Survival Rate of Patients with Idiopathic Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia. J. Thorac. Dis.9 (3), 519–528. 10.21037/jtd.2017.02.50

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 220

  ZhuoY.ZhangJ.LaboyM.LaskyJ. A. (2004). Modulation of PDGF-C and PDGF-D Expression during Bleomycin-Induced Lung Fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.286 (1), L182–L188. 10.1152/ajplung.00083.2003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 221

  ZiegenhagenM. W.SchrumS.ZisselG.ZipfelP. F.SchlaakM.Müller-QuernheimJ. (1998). Increased Expression of Proinflammatory Chemokines in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cells of Patients with Progressing Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Sarcoidosis. J. Investig. Med.46 (5), 223–231.

  • Google Scholar

• 222

  ZouM.ZhangG.ZouJ.LiuY.LiuB.HuX.et al (2020). Inhibition of the ERK1/2-Ubiquitous Calpains Pathway Attenuates Experimental Pulmonary Fibrosis In Vivo and In Vitro. Exp. Cell Res.391 (1), 111886. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111886

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar