Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

This article is part of the Research Topic

Spin-current generation

Book Review ARTICLE

Front. Phys., 14 March 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00023

Book Review: Spin Current

  • Department of Electronic Engineering, University of York, York, United Kingdom

A Book Review on
Spin Current

S. Maekawa, S. O. Valenzuela, E. Saitoh, T. Kimura (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 2017, ISBN: 97801910907380191090735

The second edition of Spin Current has been published in September 2017 by the Oxford University Press [1]. The book covers the fundamental description of a spin-polarized electron (hole) current in various systems. The book is divided into three parts: spin current, spin Hall effect, and spin transfer torque. The principles to generate spin currents are listed in the first part, which overlaps with the scope of this review cluster on “Spin-current generation.” In the second part of the book focuses on one of the major spin generation method, the spin Hall effect and associated phenomena based on devices with a current flowing in the plane. The final part of the book provides recent experimental and theoretical progress in devices using the spin transfer torque, which is the other major method for spin generation. However, the principles are categorized based on their physical origins in this book, while they are categorized by their physical phenomena in this cluster. Since some of the principles for the spin-current generation are not covered in this cluster, this book offers an ideal complementarity to this cluster.

In the book, the authors partially discussed the spin-current generation efficiency clearly, which is the most critical figure of merit for device applications. The generation efficiency (η) can typically be defined as the generated spin current per unit energy introduced, e.g., the electron-spin-current density generated (js) divided by the electron-charge-current density introduced (jc): η = js/jc [2]. Here, js is commonly deduced from a measured voltage and its magnitude is dependent upon the theoretical model exploited to interpret it. In some devices with a current flowing in the plane, e.g., devices used for spin-orbit torque, spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance and spin-Hall measurements, it is very difficult to measure js and it is widely known that js is assumed using models, such as parallel conduction, leading to overestimation of η. As can be seen in Table 1, a series of spin-current generation methods without using systems including interfaces have much higher efficiency than those with interfaces, which is favorable for device applications. For example, an interface between a ferromagnet and a non-magnet for spin injection and electromagnetic wave is limited by their efficiency to be ~20% [4, 9]. Note that in Tashiro et al. [9], the efficiency is calculated as a ratio between the absorbed and introduced microwave power, which can provide an indicative efficiency. This is predominantly due to the interfacial spin scattering by the presence of defects and contaminations. By utilizing a highly spin-polarized ferromagnet, such as a half-metallic Heusler alloy, the efficiency can be increased up to almost 30% to date [3]. It is therefore very difficult to increase the efficiency significantly unless a new half-metallic ferromagnetic material or a new device-fabrication process is developed for the realization of a very sharp interface against a non-magnet.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. List of spin-current generation efficiency using various methods.

On the other hand, 100% generation efficiency of spin currents is predicted to occur in non-magnetic materials under certain conditions [12]. For example, a topological insulator is experimentally demonstrated to generate a spin current with η to be up to ~60% [5]. This is the maximum value reported to date but it is under debate [13]. A mechanically-induced spin current to be generated in a non-magnet with a large spin-orbit coupling is also expected to have a high efficiency of up to 100% in theory [1], which is governed by the efficiency of the electrical motor to rotate the object1. It is therefore important to discuss the spin-current generation efficiency of each method in details. Some of the systems may be difficult to be realized experimentally but they may hold the key for the future design of spintronic applications. It would therefore be useful to include a chapter to discuss the spin-current generation efficiency in their next revision.

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the financial support by the EPSRC (EP/M02458X/1).

Footnotes

References

1. Maekawa S, Valenzuela S, Saitoh E, Kimura T. (eds.). Spin Current. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2017).

Google Scholar

2. Lesne E, Fu Y, Oyarzun S, Rojas-Sánchez JC, Vaz DC, Naganuma H, et al. Highly efficient and tunable spin-to-charge conversion through Rashba coupling at oxide interfaces. Nat Mater. (2016) 15:1261–66. doi: 10.1038/nmat4726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kimura T, Hashimoto N, Yamada S, Miyao M, Hamaya K. Room-temperature generation of giant pure spin currents using epitaxial Co2FeSi spin injectors. NPG Asia Mater. (2012) 4:e9. doi: 10.1038/am.2012.16

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Nguyen M-H, Zhao M, Ralph DC, Buhrman RA. Enhanced spin hall torque efficiency in Pt100–xAlx and Pt100–xHfx alloys arising from the intrinsic spin Hall effect. Appl Phys Lett. (2016) 108:242407. doi: 10.1063/1.4953768

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kondou K, Yoshimi R, Tsukazaki A, Fukuma Y, Matsuno J, Takahashi KS, et al. Fermi-level-dependent charge-to-spin current conversion by Dirac surface states of topological insulators. Nat Phys. (2016) 12:1027.

Google Scholar

6. König M, Wiedmann S, Brüne C, Roth A, Buhmann H, Molenkamp LW, et al. Quantum spin hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells. Science (2007) 318:766. doi: 10.1126/science.1148047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

7. Hirohata A. Spin Transport and Magnetic Domain Configurations in Magnetic Thin Films and Mesoscopic Structures. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (2000).

8. Ohno H, Chiba D, Matsukura F, Omiya T, Abe E, Dietl T, et al. Electric-field control of ferromagnetism. Nature (2000) 408:944–46. doi: 10.1038/35050040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tashiro T, Matsuura S, Nomura A, Watanabe S, Kang K, Sirringhaus H, et al. Spin-current emission governed by nonlinear spin dynamics. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:15158. doi: 10.1038/srep15158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Munekata H, Ohno H, von Molnar S, Segmüller A, Chang LL, Esaki L. Diluted magnetic III-V semiconductors. Phys Rev Lett. (1989) 63:1849.

Google Scholar

11. Kirihara A, Kondo K, Ishida M, Ihara K, Iwasaki Y, Someya H, et al. Flexible heat-flow sensing sheets based on the longitudinal spin Seebeck effect using one-dimensional spin-current conducting films. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:23114. doi: 10.1038/srep23114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Loss D, Goldbart PM. Persistent currents from Berry's phase in mesoscopic systems. Phys Rev B (1992) 45:13544.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Yasuda K, Tsukazaki A, Yoshimi R, Kondou K, Takahashi KS, Otani Y, et al. Current-nonlinear hall effect and spin-orbit torque magnetization switching in a magnetic topological insulator. Phys Rev Lett. (2017) 119:137204.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: spintronics, efficiency, spin current, spin current generation, device application

Citation: Hirohata A (2018) Book Review: Spin Current. Front. Phys. 6:23. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00023

Received: 15 December 2017; Accepted: 20 February 2018;
Published: 14 March 2018.

Edited by:

Peter Fischer, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), United States

Reviewed by:

Joo-Von Kim, UMR9001 Centre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies (C2N), France
Aurelien Manchon, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia

Copyright © 2018 Hirohata. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Atsufumi Hirohata, atsufumi.hirohata@york.ac.uk