Impact Factor 2.638 | CiteScore 2.3
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Phys., 04 September 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00332

New Solitary Wave Solutions for Variants of (3+1)-Dimensional Wazwaz-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equations

  • 1Faculty of Engineering Technology, Amol University of Special Modern Technologies, Amol, Iran
  • 2Department of Mathematics, Science Faculty, Firat University, Elâzig, Turkey
  • 3Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Cankaya University, Ankara, Turkey
  • 4Institute of Space Sciences, Măgurele, Romania
  • 5Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan

We solve distinct forms of (3+1)-Dimensional Wazwaz-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony [(3+1)-Dimensional WBBM] equations by employing the method of Sardar-subequation. When parameters involving this approach are taken to be special values, we can obtain the solitary wave solutions (sws) which is concluded from other approaches such as the functional variable method, the trail equation method, the first integral method and so on. We obtain new and general solitary wave solutions in terms of generalized hyperbolic and trigonometric functions. The results demonstrate the power of the proposed method for the determination of sws of non-linear evolution equations (NLEs).

Introduction

Exact solutions and solitary wave solutions of NLEs have a high importance in non-linearity theory. It is a well-known fact that numerous complex events in various fields of engineering application and non-linear science such as chemistry, mathematical physics, mechanics, hydrodynamics, biology, cosmology, and mechanics are explained by NLEs. Exact solutions produce corporal information to describe the physical behavior of system connected with these NLEs. In recent years, several efficient methods including method of extended tanh [1, 2], tanh-coth [3, 4], Hirota's direct [5, 6], sine-cosine [7, 8], extended direct algebraic [9, 10], extended trial approach [11, 12], Exp [-φ(ξ)]-Expansion [13, 14], a new auxiliary equation [15, 16], Jacobi elliptic ansatz [17, 18], generalized Bernoulli sub-ODE [19, 20], functional variable [21, 22], sub equation [23, 24], and so on [2539], have been established for efficient solutions of NLEs.

In this paper, we utilize of an effective and efficient technique for manufacturing a range of solitary wave solutions for the variants of the (3+1)-dimensional WBBM equations.

The Benjamin-Bona-Mahony (BBM) equation

ut+ux+uux-uxxt=0,    (1)

proposed in [40] as a model to study the approximately the unidirectional propagation of small-amplitude long waves on certain non-linear dispersive systems as a good alternative to the KdV [41]. It is used in modeling surface waves of long wavelength in liquids; it covers hydro-magnetic waves in cold plasma, acoustic waves in anharmonic crystals, and acoustic gravity waves in compressible fluids. Many efforts have been offered to modified forms of this equation such as

ut+ux+u2ux-uxxt=0,    (2)

known as the modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahoney (mBBM) equation [42]. Furthermore, as higher dimensional samples convert to be more realistic; various modifications to Equation (2) have been proposed in the literature among which the (3+1)-dimensional mBBM equation given in Equations (3–5) by Wazwaz [43]. Using the tanh/sech method, Wazwaz obtained soliton, kink, and periodic solutions for the following three different types of Equation (2)

ut+ux+u2uy-uxzt=0,    (3)
ut+uz+u2ux-uxyt=0,    (4)

and

ut+uy+u2uz-uxxt=0.    (5)

Based on these ideas, this paper is organized as follows. Section The Sardar-Subequation Method introduces a brief description of the Sardar-sub-equation method. Section The (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation discusses the application of the Sardar-subequation method to variants of (3+1)-dimensional WBBM equations represent by (3)–(5). The graphical presentation for the acquired solution is given in section Exact Solutions of the (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation. We complete the paper with conclusions part.

The Sardar-Subequation Method

We consider the following NLEs

G(u,ut,ux,utt,uxx,)=0,    (6)

where u = u(x, t) is an unknown function and G is a polynomial in u and its partial derivatives.

To solve (Equation 6), we take the traveling wave transformation (twt)

u(x,t)=U(η),  η=x-ct,    (7)

where c ≠ 0 is constants to be determined later.

By using (7), Equation (6) is turned into following ODE w.r.t. η

P(U,U,U,U,)=0,    (8)

in which U=U(η),U=dUdη,U=d2Udη2,.

Suppose that the Equation (8) has a solution of the form

U(η)=i=0sϖiφi(η),    (9)

where ϖi, (i = 0, 1, …, s) are coefficients to be determined with (ϖs ≠ 0) and φ(η) satisfies the ODE in the form

(φ(η))2=ρ+aφ2(η)+φ4(η),    (10)

where a and ρ are real constants. The solutions of ODE (10) are

Case I: If a > 0 and ρ = 0 then

φ1±(η)=±-pqa sechpq(aη),φ2±(η)=±pqa cschpq(aη),

where

sechpq(η)=2peη+qe-η,  cschpq(η)=2peη-qe-η.

Case II: If a < 0 and ρ = 0 then

φ3±(η)=±-pqa secpq(-aη),φ4±(η)=±-pqa cscpq(-aη),

where

secpq(η)=2peiη+qe-iη,  cscpq(η)=2ipeiη-qe-iη.

Case III: If a < 0 and ρ=a24b then

φ5±(η)=±-a2tanhpq(-a2η),φ6±(η)=±-a2cothpq(-a2η),φ7±(η)=±-a2(tanhpq(-2aη)±ipq sechpq(-2aη)),φ8±(η)=±-a2(cothpq(-2aη)±pq cschpq(-2aη)),φ9±(η)=±-a8(tanhpq(-a8η)+cothpq(-a8η)),

where

tanhpq(η)=peη-qe-ηpeη+qe-η,  cothpq(η)=peη+qe-ηpeη-qe-η.

Case IV: If a > 0 and ρ=a24 then

φ10±(η)=±a2tanpq(a2η),φ11±(η)=±a2cotpq(a2η),φ12±(η)=±a2(tanpq(2aη)±pq secpq(2aη)),φ13±(η)=±a2(cotpq(2aη)±pq cscpq(2aη)),φ14±(η)=±a8(tanpq(a8η)+cotpq(a8η)),

where

tanpq(η)=-ipeiη-qe-iηpeiη+qe-iη, cotpq(η)=ipeiη+qe-iηpeiη-qe-iη,

The procedure starts by determining s by the assistance of the classical balance rule. When s is determined the predicted solution (8) is substituted into (Equation 7). Since we seek a non-zero solution that is φ(η) ≠ 0, all the coefficient of power of φ(η) are equated to zero. Thus, the resultant algebraic system is solved for ϖis and c. One should note that ϖs ≠ 0 and c ≠ 0 both have to be satisfied in the solution sets. Whenever ϖis and c are determined the solutions are constructed by using these parameters explicitly. The procedure ends by substitution of η = xct into the solutions satisfying (Equation 7).

Remark 1. The Sardar-subequation method is considered among those general ones from which, under certain cases, various methods can be deduced such as the functional variable method [44], the first integral method [45], and so on.

The (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation

To solve the (3+1)-Dimensional (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM equations (3), (4), and (5) by using the Sardar-sub-equation method, we make the following subsection.

The First (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation

We next study the first (3+1)-dimensional WBBM equation (3). The twt u(x, t) = U(η), η = kx + λy + μzct, reduces (Equation 3) to the following ordinary differential equation

(k-c)U+λU2U+k μcU=0.    (11)

Integrating (Equation 11), we get

(k-c)U+λ3U3+k μcU=0.    (12)

Then, Equation (12) can be written as.

Ω1U+Ω2U3+U=0,    (13)

where

Ω1=k-ck μc,Ω2=λ3k μc.    (14)

The Second (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation

We next study the second (3+1)-dimensional WBBM equation (4). The twt u(x, t) = U(η), η = kx + λy + μzct, reduces (Equation 4) to the following ordinary differential equation

(μ-c)U+kU2U+k λcU=0.    (15)

Integrating (Equation 15), we get

(μ-c)U+k3U3+k λcU=0.    (16)

Then, Equation (16) can be written as.

Ω1U+Ω2U3+U=0,    (17)

where.

Ω1=μ-ck λc,Ω2=13λc.    (18)

The Third (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation

We next study the third (3+1)-dimensional WBBM equation (5). By making the traveling wave transformation

u(x,y,z,t)=U(η),  η=kx+λy+μz-ct,    (19)

(Equation 5) becomes

(λ-c)U+μU2U+k2cU=0.    (20)

Integrating (Equation 20) twice and setting the integration constants to zero yield

(λ-c)U+μ3U3+k2cU=0.    (21)

Then, Equation (21) can be written as.

Ω1U+Ω2U3+U=0,    (22)

where

Ω1=λ-ck2c,Ω2=μ3k2c.    (23)

Exact Solutions of the (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation

Balancing U with U″ in Equations (13, 17, 22), we get s = 1. Therefore, the solutions form of Equations (13, 17, 22) has the following expression

U(η)=ϖ0+ϖ1φ(η),    (24)

Substituting Equation (24) into (13) [or (17) or (22)] with along (Equation 10) and equating all the coefficients of φ(η) to zero, we obtain a highly complicated system of algebraic equations. A set of algebraic equations is obtained in ϖ0, ϖ1, and a as follows:

ϖ0:λ2Ω03+λ1Ω0=0,ϖ1:3λ2Ω02Ω1+λ1Ω1+Ω1a=0,ϖ1:3λ2Ω0Ω12=0,ϖ1:2Ω1b+λ2Ω13=0,

Solving these algebraic equations with Maple, we acquire:

ϖ0=0,  ϖ1=±-2Ω,  a=-Ω1.    (25)

The First (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation

Substituting (Equation 14) into (Equation 25), we have

ϖ0=0,  ϖ1=±-6k μcΩ,  a=c-kk μc.    (26)

The solutions of (3) corresponding to (26), along with solution (10) are

Case I: If c-kk μc>0 and ρ = 0 then

u1,1±=±6pq(c-k)λ sechpq(c-kk μc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u1,2±=±-6pq(c-k)λ cschpq(c-kk μc(kx+λy+μz-ct)).

Case II: If c-kk μc<0 and ρ = 0 then

u1,3±=±6pq(c-k)λ secpq(c-kk μc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u1,4±=±6pq(c-k)λcscpq(c-kk μc(kx+λy+μz-ct)).

Case III: If c-kk μc<0 and ρ=(c-k2k μc)2 then

u1,5±=±3(c-k)λtanhpq(-c-k2kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u1,6±=±3(c-k)λcothpq(-c-k2kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u1,7±=±3(c-k)λ(tanhpq(-2(c-k)kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))     ±ipq sechpq(-2(c-k)kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u1,8±=±3(c-k)λ(cothpq(-2(c-k)kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))     ±pq cschpq(-2(c-k)kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))),u1,9±=±3(c-k)4λ(tanhpq(-c-k8kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))     +cothpq(-c-k8kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))),

Case IV: If c-kkμc>0 and ρ=(c-k2kμc)2 then

u1,10±=±-3(c-k)λtanpq(c-k2kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u1,11±=±-3(c-k)λcotpq(c-k2kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u1,12±=±-3(c-k)λ(tanpq(2(c-k)kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))        ±pq secpq(2(c-k)kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u1,14±=±-3(c-k)4λ(tanpq(c-k8kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))        +cotpq(c-k8kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))),

The Second (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation

Substituting (Equation 18) into (Equation 25), we have

ϖ0=0,  ϖ1=±-6λc,  a=c-μk λc.    (27)

The solutions of (4) corresponding to (27), along with solution (10) are

Case I: If c-μkλc>0 and ρ = 0 then

u2,1±=±6pq(c-μ)k sechpq(c-μkλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u2,2±=±-6pq(c-μ)k cschpq(c-μkλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)).

Case II: If c-μkλc<0 and ρ = 0 then

u2,3±=±6pq(c-μ)k secpq(-c-μkλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u2,4±=±6pq(c-μ)kcscpq(-c-μkλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),

Case III: If c-μkλc<0 and ρ=(c-μ2kλc)2 then

u2,5±=±3(c-μ)ktanhpq(-c-μ2kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u2,6±=±3(c-μ)kcothpq(-c-μ2kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u2,7±=±3(c-μ)k(tanhpq(-2(c-μ)kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct))     ±ipq sechpq(-2(c-μ)kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u2,8±=±3(c-μ)k(cothpq(-2(c-μ)kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct))     ±pq cschpq(-2(c-μ)kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct))),u2,9±=±3(c-μ)4k(tanhpq(-c-μ8kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct))     +cothpq(-c-μ8kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct))),

Case IV: If c-μkλc>0 and ρ=(c-μ2kλc)2 then

u2,10±=±-3(c-μ)ktanpq(c-μ2kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u2,11±=±-3(c-μ)kcotpq(c-μ2kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u2,12±=±-3(c-μ)k(tanpq(2(c-μ)kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct))        ±pq secpq(2(c-μ)kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u2,14±=±-3(c-μ)4k(tanpq(c-μ8kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct))        +cotpq(c-μ8kλc(kx+λy+μz-ct))),

The Third (3+1)-Dimensional WBBM Equation

Substituting (Equation 23) into (Equation 25), we have

ϖ0=0,  ϖ1=±-6k2cμ,  a=c-λk2c.    (28)

The solutions of (5) corresponding to (28), along with solution (10) are

Case I: If c-λk2c>0 and ρ = 0 then

u3,1±=±6pq(c-λ)μ sechpq(c-λk2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u3,2±=±-6pq(c-λ)μ cschpq(c-λk2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)).

Case II: If c-λk2c<0 and ρ = 0 then

u3,3±=±6pq(c-λ)μ secpq(-c-λk2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u3,4±=±6pq(c-λ)μcscpq(-c-λk2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),

Case III: If c-λk2c<0 and ρ=(c-λ2k2c)2 then

u3,5±=±3(c-λ)μtanhpq(-c-λk2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u3,6±=±3(c-λ)μcothpq(-c-λk2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u3,7±=±3(c-λ)μ(tanhpq(-2(c-λ)k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct))     ±ipq sechpq(-2(c-λ)k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u3,8±=±3(c-λ)μ(cothpq(-2(c-k)kμc(kx+λy+μz-ct))     ±pq cschpq(-2(c-λ)k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct))),u3,9±=±3(c-λ)4μ(tanhpq(-c-λ8k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct))     +cothpq(-c-λ8k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct))),

Case IV: If c-λk2c>0 and ρ=(c-λ2k2c)2 then

u3,10±=±-3(c-λ)μtanpq(c-λk2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u3,11±=±-3(c-λ)μcotpq(c-λk2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u3,12±=±-3(c-λ)μ(tanpq(2(c-λ)k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct))        ±pq secpq(2(c-λ)k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct)),u3,14±=±-3(c-λ)4μ(tanpq(c-λ8k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct))        +cotpq(c-λ8k2c(kx+λy+μz-ct))),

Graphical Presentation

Graph is a strong tool for relationship describing clarity the solutions of the challenges. Therefore, some graphs of the solutions are given in each subsection above with different parameters. The graphs easily have shown the solitary wave form of the modulus solution u1,3+,u1,7-,u2,2+,u2,6-,u3,1+, and u3,14- in Figures 16 [(a) 3D plot, (b) cp, and (c) 2D plot], respectively. We see in Figures 1, 6 that the absolute value of u1,3+ and u3,14- are singular periodic wave solutions and, in Figures 2, 5 that the absolute value of u1,7- and u3,1+ are bright solitary wave solutions and in Figures 3, 4 that the absolute value of u2,2+ and u2,5- are singular solitary wave solutions.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The sws |u1,3+| with parameters μ = 1, k = 1, c = 0.5, λ = 1, p = 0.98, q = 0.95, y = 0.5, z = 1 and (A) 3D plot, (B) contour plot (cp), and (C) 2D plot.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The sws |u1,7-| with parameters μ = 3, k = 2.5, c = 1.5, λ = 0.2, p = 1.2, q = 1.1, y = 1.5, z = 0.5 and (A) 3D plot, (B) cp, and (C) 2D plot.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The sws |u2,2+| with μ = 0.3, k = 0.5, c = 3, λ = 5, p = 1.1, q = 1.2, y = 1, z = 1 (A) 3D plot, (B) cp, and (C) 2D plot.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The sws |u2,6-| withμ = 1, k = 0.5, c = 0.2, λ = 3, p = 0.97, q = 0.95, y = 1.5, z = 0.5 and (A) 3D plot, (B) cp, and (C) 2D plot.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. The sws |u3,1+| with parameters μ = 2, k = 1, c = 1.5, λ = −1, p = 1, q = 1, y = 1.5, z = 2 and (A) 3D plot, (B) cp, and (C) 2D plot.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. The sws |u3,14-| with parameters μ = 0.5, k = 0.2, c = 1, λ = 0.5, p = 0.97, q = 0.95, y = 1, z = 1 and (A) 3D plot, (B) cp, and (C) 2D plot.

Conclusions

We have proposed a method, namely Sardar-subequation method to solve NLEs with the help of Maple Software. Distinct forms of (3+1)-dimensional WBBM equations are handled to display the effectiveness of the suggested method. From our results, some sws are obtained including the generalized hyperbolic and trigonometric function solutions. As far as we know, for the first time, we describe and introduce Sardar-subequation method which is a new method for solving NLEs. Thus, all the solutions distinct forms of (3+1)-dimensional WBBM equations are new, which cannot be found in literature to our best knowledge. We can also see that the approach used in this letter is very effective, powerful and convenient and can be steadily applied to NLEs. We will extend the proposed method for some fractional models [4648] in a future work.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

HR, MI, and DB contributed conception and design of the study. HR organized the database. MI performed the statistical analysis. DB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. HR, MI, and DB wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Wazwaz AM. The tan h method: solitons and periodic solutions for the Dodd-Bullough-Mikhailov and the Tzitzeica-Dodd-Bullough equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals. (2005) 25:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.09.122

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wazwaz AM. The tanh method for traveling wave solutions of nonlinear equations. Appl Math Comput. (2004) 154:713–23. doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00745-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wazwaz AM. The tanh-coth method for solitons and kink solutions for nonlinear parabolic equations. Appl Math Comput. (2007) 188:1467–75. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wazwaz AM. The tanh-coth method for new compactons and solitons solutions for the K (n,n) and the K (n+1, n+1) equations. Appl Math Comput. (2007) 188:1930–40. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.076

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Wazwaz AM. The Hirota's direct method and the tanh-coth method for multiple-soliton solutions of the Sawada-Kotera-Ito seventh-order equation. Appl Math Comput. (2008) 199:133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.09.034

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wazwaz AM. The Hirota's direct method for multiple-soliton solutions for three model equations of shallow water waves. Appl Math Comput. (2008) 201:489–503. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.12.037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wazwaz AM. The sine-cosine method for obtaining solutions with compact and noncompact structures. Appl Math Comput. (2004) 159:559–76. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2003.08.136

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wazwaz AM. A sine-cosine method for handlingnonlinear wave equations. Math Comput Model. (2004) 40:499–508. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2003.12.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gao W., Rezazadeh H, Pinar Z, Baskonus HM, Sarwar S, Yel G. Novel explicit solutions for the nonlinear Zoomeron equation by using newly extended direct algebraic technique. Optic Quant Electron. (2020) 52:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-2162-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Rezazadeh H. New solitons solutions of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity. Optik. (2018) 167:218–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.04.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Raza N, Aslam MR, Rezazadeh H. Analytical study of resonant optical solitons with variable coefficients in Kerr and non-Kerr law media. Optic Quant Electron. (2019) 51:59. doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-1773-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Raza N, Javid A. Optical dark and dark-singular soliton solutions of (1+2)-dimensional chiral nonlinear Schrodinger's equation. Waves Random Comp Media. (2019) 29:496–508. doi: 10.1080/17455030.2018.1451009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Raza N, Abdullah M, Butt AR. Analytical soliton solutions of Biswas-Milovic equation in Kerr and non-Kerr law media. Optik. (2018) 157:993–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.11.043

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Raza N, Afzal U, Butt AR, Rezazadeh H. Optical solitons in nematic liquid crystals with Kerr and parabolic law nonlinearities. Optic Quant Electron. (2019) 51:107. doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-1813-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Khater MM, Seadawy AR, Lu D. Dispersive optical soliton solutions for higher order nonlinear Sasa-Satsuma equation in mono mode fibers via new auxiliary equation method. Superlattices Microstruct. (2018) 113:346–58. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.11.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Rezazadeh H, Korkmaz A, Eslami M, Mirhosseini-Alizamini SM. A large family of optical solutions to Kundu-Eckhaus model by a new auxiliary equation method. Optic Quant Electron. (2019) 51:84. doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-1801-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Aslan EC., Inc M. Optical soliton solutions of the NLSE with quadratic-cubic-Hamiltonian perturbations and modulation instability analysis. Optik. (2019) 196:162661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.04.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Korpinar Z, Inc M, Bayram M, Hashemi MS. New optical solitons for Biswas–Arshed equation with higher order dispersions and full nonlinearity. Optik. (2019) 206:163332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163332

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yusuf A, Inc M, Aliyu AI, Baleanu D. Optical solitons possessing beta derivative of the Chen-Lee-Liu equation in optical fiber. Front Phys. (2019) 7:34. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00034

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Yusuf A, Inc M, Baleanu D. Optical solitons with M-truncated and beta derivatives in nonlinear optics. Front Phys. (2019) 7:126. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00126

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Çenesiz Y, Tasbozan O, Kurt A. Functional Variable Method for conformable fractional modified KdV-ZK equation and Maccari system. Tbilisi Math J. (2017) 10:117–25. doi: 10.1515/tmj-2017-0010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Eslami M, Rezazadeh H, Rezazadeh M, Mosavi SS. Exact solutions to the space-time fractional Schrödinger-Hirota equation and the space-time modified KDV-Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation. Optic Quant Electron. (2017) 49:279. doi: 10.1007/s11082-017-1112-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kurt A. New analytical and numerical results for fractional Bogoyavlensky-Konopelchenko equation arising in fluid dynamics. Appl Math A J Chin Univ. (2020) 35:101–12. doi: 10.1007/s11766-020-3808-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Atilgan E, Senol M, Kurt A, Tasbozan O. New wave solutions of time-fractional coupled Boussinesq-Whitham-Broer-Kaup equation as a model of water waves. China Ocean Eng. (2019) 33:477–83. doi: 10.1007/s13344-019-0045-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Nestor S, Houwe A, Rezazadeh H., Bekir A, Betchewe G, Doka SY. New solitary waves for the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov equations. Modern Phys Lett B. (2020) 60:324–343. doi: 10.1142/S0217984920502462

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Nestor S, Abbagari S, Houwe A, Betchewe G, Doka SY. Diverse chirped optical solitons and new complex traveling waves in nonlinear optical fibers. Commun Theor Phys. (2020) 72:065501. doi: 10.1088/1572-9494/ab7ecd

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Houwe A, Abbagari S, Salathiel Y, Inc M, Doka SY, Crépin KT, et al. Complex traveling-wave and solitons solutions to the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov equations. Results Phys. (2020) 17:103127. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103127

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Houwe A, Abbagari S, Inc M, Betchewe G, Doka SY, Crépin, et al. Chirped solitons in discrete electrical transmission line. Results Phys. (2020) 18:103188. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103188

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Park C, Khater MM, Abdel-Aty AH, Attia RA, Rezazadeh H, Zidan AM, et al. Dynamical analysis of the nonlinear complex fractional emerging telecommunication model with higher-order dispersive cubic-quintic. Alexandria Eng J. (2020) 59:1425–33. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.03.046

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Alquran M, Jarrah A. Jacobi elliptic function solutions for a two-mode KdV equation. J King Saud Univ Sci. (2019) 31:485–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2017.06.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Jaradat HM, Syam M, Alquran M. A two-mode coupled Korteweg-de Vries: multiple-soliton solutions and other exact solutions. Nonlinear Dyn. (2017) 90:371–7. doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3668-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Alquran M, Jaradat HM, Syam MI. A modified approach for a reliable study of new nonlinear equation: two-mode Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers equation. Nonlinear Dyn. (2018) 91:1619–26. doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3968-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Jaradat HM, Awawdeh F, Al-Shara S, Alquran M, Momani S. Controllable dynamical behaviors and the analysis of fractal burgers hierarchy with the full effects of inhomogeneities of media. Rom. J. Phys. (2015) 60:324–43.

Google Scholar

34. Syam M, Jaradat HM, Alquran M. A study on the two-mode coupled modified Korteweg-de Vries using the simplified bilinear and the trigonometric-function methods. Nonlinear Dyn. (2017) 90:1363–71. doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3732-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Alquran M, Jaradat HM, Al-Shara S, Awawdeh F. A new simplified bilinear method for the N-soliton solutions for a generalized FmKdV equation with time-dependent variable coefficients. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. (2015) 16:259–69. doi: 10.1515/ijnsns-2014-0023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Rezazadeh H, Vahidi J, Zafar A, Bekir A. The functional variable method to find new exact solutions of the nonlinear evolution equations with dual-power-law nonlinearity. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. (2020) 21:249–57. doi: 10.1515/ijnsns-2019-0064

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Yépez-Martínez H, Gómez-Aguilar JF. Fractional sub-equation method for Hirota-Satsuma-coupled KdV equation and coupled mKdV equation using the Atangana's conformable derivative. Waves Ran Comp Med. (2019) 29:678–93. doi: 10.1080/17455030.2018.1464233

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Yépez-Martínez H, Gómez-Aguilar JF, Baleanu D. Beta-derivative and sub-equation method applied to the optical solitons in medium with parabolic law nonlinearity and higher order dispersion. Optik. (2018) 155:357–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.10.104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Yépez-Martínez H, Gómez-Aguilar JF. M-derivative applied to the soliton solutions for the Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel equation with dual-dispersion for optical fibers. Optical Quant Electron. (2019) 51:31. doi: 10.1007/s11082-018-1740-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Benjamin TB, Bona JL, Mahony JJ. Model equations for long waves in nonlinear dispersive systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci. (1972) 272:47–78. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1972.0032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Bona JL, Pritchard WG, Scott LR. An evaluation of a model equation for water waves. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci. (1981) 302:457–510. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1981.0178

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Yusufoglu E. New solitonary solutions for the MBBM equations using Exp-function method. Phys Lett A. (2008) 372:442–6. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.07.062

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Wazwaz AM. Exact soliton and kink solutions for new (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear modified equations of wave propagation. Open Eng. (2017) 7:169–74. doi: 10.1515/eng-2017-0023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Eslami M, Mirzazadeh M. Functional variable method to study nonlinear evolution equations. Open Eng. (2013) 3:451–8. doi: 10.2478/s13531-013-0104-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Mirzazadeh M, Eslami M. Exact solutions of the Kudryashov-Sinelshchikov equation and nonlinear telegraph equation via the first integral method. Nonlinear Analy Model Control. (2012) 17:481–8. doi: 10.15388/NA.17.4.14052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Memon Z, Qureshi S, Memon BR. Mathematical analysis for a new nonlinear measles epidemiological system using real incidence data from Pakistan. Eur Phys J Plus. (2020) 135:378. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00392-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Atangana A, Qureshi S. Mathematical analysis of dengue fever outbreak by novel fractional operators with field data. Phys A. (2019) 526:121127. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.121127

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Atangana A, Qureshi S. Modeling attractors of chaotic dynamical system with fractal-fractional operators. Chaos Solit Fractals. (2019) 123:320–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.04.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Sardar-subequation method, (3+1)-dimensional WBBM equations, solitary wave solutions, NLEs, simulations

Citation: Rezazadeh H, Inc M and Baleanu D (2020) New Solitary Wave Solutions for Variants of (3+1)-Dimensional Wazwaz-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equations. Front. Phys. 8:332. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00332

Received: 13 April 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020;
Published: 04 September 2020.

Edited by:

Francisco Gomez, Centro Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Mexico

Reviewed by:

Sania Qureshi, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan
Haci Mehmet Baskonus, Harran University, Turkey
Marwan Alquran, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan

Copyright © 2020 Rezazadeh, Inc and Baleanu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dumitru Baleanu, dumitru@cankaya.edu.tr