Impact Factor 3.560 | CiteScore 3.1
More on impact ›


Front. Phys., 18 November 2020 |

Editorial: The Long-Lasting Quest for Nuclear Interactions: The Past, the Present and the Future

  • 1Department of Physics “E. Fermi”, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • 2Sezione di Pisa, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Pisa, Italy

As it was stated when this Research Topic was launched, despite many years of intense research, our understanding of the force that holds the atomic nuclei together is still far from complete, and numerous crucial questions are yet to be answered. The theory of nuclear forces has a long and glorious history, as recently summarized in 1. In a nutshell, in the 1990s, meson-theoretic and pure phenomenological approaches were used to describe the nuclear interaction, with models which were able to reproduce the large set of two-nucleon (2N) experimental data available at that time (or more properly the phase-shifts arising from a partial wave analysis of these data) with a χ2/datum close to unity [2, 3]. However, all these models were relegated in the world of phenomenology and no connection with the underlying theory of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) could be found.

At the beginning of the 1990s, we entered in a new still-ongoing phase: nuclear physicists “discovered” QCD and, more importantly, effective field theory (EFT). Following a seminal idea of Weinberg [4, 5], several groups developed nuclear interaction models within the so-called chiral EFT (χEFT), an EFT where the spontaneous breaking of QCD chiral symmetry plays a crucial role. The χEFT approach is reviewed and discussed at length in essentially all contributions to this Research Topic, as we will outline below. Due to lack of space, here we only mention that the accuracy nowadays reached by the chiral models for nuclear interactions is comparable to, if not even better than, the one reached by the “old” phenomenological models.

Let us quickly review the different contributions to this Research Topic. Four of the most active groups working to derive nuclear force within the χEFT approach are among the contributors to this Research Topic. In particular, Epelbaum et al. review the most recent achievements of the so-called Bochum group, focusing on a new generation of nuclear chiral forces derived using the recently proposed semi-local regularization method. The authors also describe the ongoing efforts by the Low-Energy Nuclear Physics International Collaboration (LENPIC) toward developing consistent two- and many-body forces, and discuss selected applications. The contribution of Entem et al. is a clear and thorough review of the latest work of the so-called Idaho group, which has developed χEFT-based potentials, from leading order up to next-to-next-to-next-to-next-to leading order (N4LO). The authors present also a discussion of the most recently developed N5LO contributions, and their effects on 2N scattering. In the contribution of Ekström we can find a discussion of the importance of careful model calibration and uncertainty quantification of theoretical predictions. To this aim, the author reviews how statistical computing and methods, such as Bayesian inference methods, can be used in conjunction with ab-initio methods for atomic nuclei, in order to construct χEFT-based nuclear potentials. Finally, Piarulli et al. review the efforts made by two different groups in applying the χEFT approach in coordinate space. This allows to derive chiral potential models which are local and suitable to be used in studies of nuclear structure with the ab-initio methods based on Quantum Monte Carlo techniques. Selected results, ranging from light nuclei up to 16O, as well as neutron matter, are also presented.

Two essential aspects of χEFT are also reviewed in the Research Topic. The first one is the problem of renormalization of chiral nuclear forces. In his contribution, Van Kolck summarizes the huge body of work done on this subject and describes alternative approaches which can be used to achieve renormalization order by order. The second essential aspect is the proper quantification of uncertainties on 2N phase shifts analysis and, consequently, on the 2N interactions. The work done in Granada in determining the 2N scattering database is reviewed by Arriola et al., who also discuss the impact of this database on the determination of the 2N force.

The χEFT approach can be suitably adapted to derive also more general baryon-baryon interactions. For instance, Petschauer et al. review the systematic derivation of hyperon-nuclear forces from the symmetries of QCD within non-relativistic SU(3) χEFT, and also discuss several applications, ranging from hyperon-nucleon scattering up to hyperon-nuclear few- and many-body systems, including hypernuclei and neutron star matter. The contribution of de Vries et al., instead, is about the parity-violating but time-reversal conserving, and the parity-violating and time-reversal-violating forces in nuclei. These forces are a tiny component of the total interaction between nucleons, but their study is extremely interesting, because they allow one to obtain information on fundamental symmetries using nuclear systems. In this contribution, the authors review how the above mentioned interactions are derived in χEFT, and discuss the effects of these forces on several few-nucleon observables.

Two papers are devoted to approaches alternative to χEFT used to derive nuclear interaction models. In the first one, Fernández et al. review the different quark models used to describe 2N and, more in general, baryon-baryon interaction. These models are non-perturbative QCD-inspired and retain quark and gluons as degrees of freedom. Special attention is devoted to the constituent quark model. This model has recently attracted large interest, because its description of the 2N interaction at short distances is qualitatively consistent with the lattice-QCD simulations near the physical quark masses. An example of nuclear interaction models derived from lattice-QCD simulations is presented by Aoki et al., who discuss the so-called HAL QCD method, and review the derivation of the central, tensor, and spin-orbit components present in the 2N force, and of the three-nucleon (3N) interaction.

The nuclear interaction models derived in χEFT reproduce with great accuracy 2N bound and scattering states. However, it is essential to know how they perform in reproducing other nuclear systems, starting from A>2 light nuclei. In order to address this question, very accurate ab-initio methods are fundamental. In this Research Topic, the latest advances of two of these methods are reviewed: Lazauskas et al. discuss the application of the Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations in configuration space to the four- and five-nucleon systems; Marcucci et al. review the hyperspherical harmonics method and its latest results obtained with both local and non-local chiral potentials for three- and four-body nuclear bound and scattering systems. Together with the method based on the Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations in momentum space [6, 7], the presented methods are among the most accurate ones for bound and scattering A=3,4 nuclear systems.

In order to use chiral forces in larger nuclei up to nuclear matter, further work is necessary. Some issues related to the use of nuclear forces in the medium are discussed by Sammarruca et al. and Holt et al. In particular, Sammarruca et al. present a review of their recent studies of the equation of state for symmetric nuclear matter and pure neutron matter, using state-of-the-art chiral interactions. Holt et al. discuss the implementation of 3N forces in many-body nuclear structure and reaction studies, presenting an approach which employs a medium-dependent 2N interaction. The authors also discuss several applications.

We conclude this overview with the contribution of Richard, which is devoted to the physics of low-energy antiprotons and, most importantly in this context, its link with nuclear forces. In fact, a good understanding of antinucleon-nucleon and antinucleon-nucleus interactions is necessary in order to investigate important phenomena in astrophysics, as high-energy cosmic rays, or the matter-antimatter asymmetry in early Universe.

In conclusion, this Research Topic has collected the contributions of the researchers most active in the development and understanding of the nuclear interaction and some related topics, as those outlined above. At the end, we hope that this article collection will serve as a useful compendium for practitioners, who everyday apply nuclear potentials in their work and wish to learn about the most significant aspects in an efficient way.

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


The author would like to warmly thank Prof. Ruprecht Machleidt for his deep insights and great support in proposing, managing, and reviewing large part of the editorial work. Last, but not least, the author would like to thank the many colleagues who have enthusiastically answered to the call of submission, and the many reviewers who, with great professionalism, have worked anonymously together with the authors to improve the submitted articles.


1. Machleidt R. Historical perspective and future prospects for nuclear interactions. Int J Mod Phys E (2017). 26(11):1730005. doi:10.1142/s0218301317300053

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Machleidt R. High-precision, charge-dependent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential. Phys Rev C (2001). 63(2):024001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.024001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wiringa RB, Stoks VGJ, Schiavilla R. Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking. Phys Rev C (1995). 51(1):38–51. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.51.38

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Weinberg S. Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians. Phys Lett B (1990). 251(2):288–92. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90938-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Weinberg S. Effective chiral Lagrangians for nucleon-pion interactions and nuclear forces. Nucl Phys B (1991). 363(1):3–18. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90231-L

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Deltuva A, Fonseca A, Sauer P. Coulomb force effects in few-nucleon systems. Few Body Syst (2019). 60(2):29. doi:10.1007/s00601-019-1496-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Witała H, Golak J, Skibiński R, Topolnicki K, Epelbaum E, Hebeler K, et al. Application of semilocal coordinate-space regularized chiral forces to elastic Nd scattering and breakup. Few Body Syst (2019). 60(1):19. doi:10.1007/s00601-019-1485-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Nuclear interactions, two- and three-nucleon interactions, chiral effective field theory, lattice QCD, light nuclei, ab-initio methods

Citation: Marcucci LE (2020) Editorial: The Long-Lasting Quest for Nuclear Interactions: The Past, the Present and the Future. Front. Phys. 8:609907. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.609907

Received: 24 September 2020; Accepted: 05 October 2020;
Published: 18 November 2020.

Edited and reviewed by:

Alex Hansen, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Copyright © 2020 Marcucci. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Laura E. Marcucci,