Low Valence Nickelates: Launching the Nickel Age of Superconductivity

1 Background

After much synthesis and characterization of low-valence layered nickelates over three decades [1–7], superconductivity was finally observed [8] in hole-doped $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ (initially for rare earth $\mathcal{R}$ = Nd, later for $\mathcal{R}$ = La [9, 10] and Pr [11]) with T_c exhibiting a dome-like dependence [12, 13] being maximal (10–15 K) near 20% doping. This series of discoveries in $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ materials marked the beginning of a new, nickel age of superconductivity [14, 15] launching a plethora of experimental [16–22] and theoretical [23–43] work.

$\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ materials are the n = ∞ member of a larger series of layered nickelates with chemical formula ${(\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{O}}_2)}^{-}{[\mathcal{R}{({\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2)}_n]}^{+}$ ($\mathcal{R}$ = La, Pr, and Nd; n = 2, 3, … , ∞) that possess n cuprate-like NiO₂ planes in a square-planar coordination. Except for the n = ∞ case, groups of n-NiO₂ layers are separated by ${\mathcal{R}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2$ blocking layers that severely limit coupling between adjacent units (see Figure 1). These layered square-planar compounds are obtained via oxygen deintercalation from the corresponding parent perovskite $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_3$ (n = ∞) [2] and Ruddlesden-Popper ${\mathcal{R}}_{n+1}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}}_n{\mathrm{O}}_{3n+1}$ (n ≠ ∞) phases [1]. As shown in Figure 1, the ${(\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{O}}_2)}^{-}{[{(\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2)}_n]}^{+}$ series can be mapped onto the cuprate phase diagram in terms of the nickel 3d-electron count, with nominal fillings running from d⁹ (n = ∞) to d⁸ (for n = 1). That superconductivity arises in this series suggests that a new family of superconductors has been uncovered, currently with two members, n = ∞ and n = 5 [44], the only ones (so far) where an optimal Ni valence near d^8.8 has been attained.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. (A) Crystal structures of the n = ∞, n = 5, and n = 3 layered nickelates highlighting the presence of the n-NiO₂ layers and the fluorite blocking slabs present in the n ≠ ∞ materials. $\mathcal{R}$, Ni and O atoms are shown in gray, blue, and red, respectively. (B) Schematic phase diagram as a function of nominal d filling for layered nickelates (top) and cuprates (bottom), highlighting the regions where superconducting domes have been experimentally reported. The members of the ${\mathcal{R}}_{n+1}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}}_n{\mathrm{O}}_{2n+2}$ series are marked with lines (dashed lines correspond to materials that have not been synthesized yet). The n = 5 member falls close to the optimal doping value for both cuprates and the infinite-layer nickelate.

Some overviews on experimental and theoretical findings in this family of materials have been recently published [45–48]. In this paper, we focus on the electronic structure of layered nickelates, confining ourselves to materials with the basic infinite-layer structure: n square planar NiO₂ layers each separated by an ${\mathcal{R}}^{3+}$ ion without the apical oxygen ion(s) that are common in most cuprates and nickelates.

2 From ∞ to One

2.1 “Infinite-Layer” n = ∞ Nickelate: $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$

In parent $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ materials, Ni has the same formal 3d⁹ electronic configuration as in cuprates. As mentioned above, superconductivity in $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ materials emerges via hole doping, with T_c exhibiting a dome-like dependence [12, 13, 49] akin to cuprates, as shown in Figure 1. However, in parent infinite-layer nickelates the resistivity shows a metallic T-dependence (but with a low temperature upturn) [7, 8] and there is no signature of long-range magnetic order, even though the presence of strong antiferromagnetic (AFM) correlations has recently been reported via resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) experiments [50]. This is in contrast to cuprates, where the parent phase is an AFM charge-transfer insulator.

Noteworthy differences from cuprates were already reflected in early electronic structure calculations as well [51, 52]. For the parent material $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$, non-magnetic density functional theory (DFT) calculations show that besides the Ni-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ band, additional bands of $\mathcal{R}$-5d character cross the Fermi level. The electronic structure of $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ is three-dimensional-like, with a large c-axis dispersion of both (occupied) Ni and (nearly empty) $\mathcal{R}$-$5d_{z^2}$ bands (see Figure 2) due to the close spacing of successive NiO₂ planes along the c-axis. The $\mathcal{R}$-$5d_{z^2}$ dispersion leads to the appearance of electron pockets at the Γ and A points of the Brillouin zone which display mainly $\mathcal{R}$-$5d_{z^2}$ and $\mathcal{R}$-5d_xy character, respectively, that self-dope the large hole-like Ni-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ Fermi surface. This self-doping effect (absent in the cuprates) introduces a substantial difference between nominal and actual filling of the Ni-d bands, accounting for conduction and possibly also disrupting AFM order. The presence of the 5d electrons is consistent with experimental data, which reveal not only metallic behavior but also evidence for negative charge carriers as reflected in the negative Hall coefficient [8, 12, and 13]. However, as the material becomes doped with Sr, the $\mathcal{R}$-5d pockets become depopulated, the Hall coefficient changes sign [8], and the electronic structure becomes more single-band, cuprate-like [39, 53].

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. DFT band structures in the paramagnetic state for the n = ∞, n = 5, and n = 3 layered nickelates. The two types of Ni e_g bands are highlighted, as well as the two relevant $\mathcal{R}$-5d bands (La is used as an example). It can be observed how the involvement of $\mathcal{R}$-d bands around the Fermi level is reduced with decreasing n.

Besides the presence of $\mathcal{R}$-5d electrons, infinite-layer nickelates have some other relevant differences from the cuprates, particularly their much larger charge-transfer energy between the metal 3d, and oxygen 2p states. In cuprates, the charge-transfer energy ɛ_3d-ɛ_2p is as small as 1–2 eV [54], indicative of a large p-d hybridization, and enabling Zhang-Rice singlet formation. In NdNiO₂, the charge-transfer energy is much larger, ∼4.4 eV, as obtained from the on-site energies derived from a Wannier analysis [39]. The lack of a pre-peak in x-ray absorption (XAS) data at the oxygen K-edge [18] in NdNiO₂ has indeed been associated to the presence of a large charge-transfer energy. Because of this increase in charge transfer energy, the nickelate is more Mott-like, whereas the cuprate is more charge-transfer-like, in the scheme of Zaanen, Sawatzky, and Allen [35, 38]. In addition, theoretical investigations of $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ find decreasing oxygen content as one traverses from La to Lu [55].

The doped holes tend to be on the Ni sites, as opposed to cuprates where they tend to reside on the oxygen sites. Recent DFT + DMFT Ni 2p_3/2 core-level XPS, XAS, and RIXS calculations (consistent with available core-level spectroscopies) indeed confirm that the Ni-O hybridization does not play an important role in connection with doping, implying that the physics of NdNiO₂ is well described by a single-band Hubbard model [56]. This in turn brings up the issue of the nature of the doped holes on the Ni sites. That is, do they behave as effective d⁸ dopants, and if so, is d⁸ high-spin (S = 1) or low-spin (S = 0)? If the former, then these materials would fall in the category of Hund’s metals, and thus would deviate substantially from cuprates. DMFT calculations are consistent with this picture as they systematically favor high-spin d⁸ (S = 1) states [40, 57–60]. DFT calculations point instead towards a cuprate-like low-spin (S = 0) picture due to the large crystal-field splitting of the e_g states in a square planar environment [53]. Along these lines, impurity calculations show that in the NiO₂ layers a Zhang-Rice singlet (like in CuO₂) is indeed favored upon hole-doping [35]. Further, cluster calculations find that hole doping distributes over the entire cluster, in contrast to local S = 1 states [61].

Because of their lower degree of p − d hybridization, the superexchange in $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$, as determined by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering experiments [50], is about half that of the cuprates. Still, its value (J = 64 meV) confirms the existence of significant AFM correlations [30, 50]. Long-range AFM order has however not been reported, with NMR data suggesting the ground state is paramagnetic [62], and susceptibility data interpreted as spin-glass behavior [63]. Neél type order is consistently obtained in DFT studies [24, 27, 29, and 51], as in d⁹ insulating cuprates. The predicted AFM ground state in DFT + U calculations [64] is characterized by the involvement of both $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $d_{z^2}$ Ni bands [65]. This state is peculiar in that it displays a flat-band one-dimensional-like van Hove singularity of $d_{z^2}$ character pinned at the Fermi level. These flat-band instabilities should inhibit but not eliminate incipient AFM tendencies [65].

Discussing the origin of superconductivity in $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$, as in the cuprates, is a controversial topic. But certainly the reduced T_c of the nickelate compared to the cuprates is consistent with the reduced value of the superexchange, and the larger charge-transfer energy. t-J model and RPA calculations building from tight-binding parameters derived from DFT calculations show that the dominant pairing instability is in the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ channel, as in cuprates [66]. Indeed, single-particle tunneling measurements on the superconducting infinite-layer nickelate have revealed a V-shape feature indicative of a d-wave gap [67]. On a broader level, several theoretical papers have speculated that the superconductivity is instead an interfacial effect of the infinite-layer film with the SrTiO₃ substrate [68–71], though recently superconductivity has been observed when other substrates are used [72]. In this context, it should be noted that superconductivity has not been observed in bulk samples yet; since the precursor is cubic, there is no set orientation for the c-axis, meaning the bulk is far less ordered than the film [20, 21].

2.2 The Superconducting n = 5 Material

Recently, a second superconducting member has been found in the ${(\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{O}}_2)}^{-}{[{(\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2)}_n]}^{+}$ family: the n = 5 layered nickelate Nd₆Ni₅O₁₂, also synthesized in thin-film form [44]. As schematically shown in Figure 1, this material has a nominal valence near that of the optimally-doped infinite-layer material (that is, Ni^1.2+: d^8.8 nominal filling) and so, in contrast to its infinite-layer counterpart, it is superconducting without the need for chemical doping. While $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ displays NiO₂ layers separated by $\mathcal{R}$ ions, this quintuple-layer material (with five NiO₂ layers per formula unit) has an additional fluorite ${\mathcal{R}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2$ slab separating successive five-layer units. Further, each successive five-layer group is displaced by half a lattice constant along the a and b directions (i.e., the body centered translation of the I4/mmm space group). These additional structural features effectively decouple the five-layer blocks, so the c-axis dispersion of this material is much weaker than its infinite-layer counterpart. Despite these significant structural differences, T_c is similar to that of the doped infinite-layer materials (with the onset of the superconducting transition taking place at ∼ 15 K), reducing the chances that yet to be synthesized low valence nickelates will have substantially higher transition temperatures.

In terms of its electronic structure [73], the n = 5 material is intermediate between cuprate-like and n = ∞-like behavior. From DFT calculations, the charge-transfer energy of Nd₆Ni₅O₁₂ is ∼ 4.0 eV. This reduced energy compared to the undoped infinite-layer material means that the Ni-3d states are not as close in energy to the Nd-5d states, consistent with the presence of a pre-peak in the oxygen K-edge (similar to what happens with Sr-doped NdNiO₂ [53]). As a consequence, the electron pockets arising from the Nd-5d states are significantly smaller than those in the infinite-layer material (see Figure 2). This reduced pocket size along with the large hole-like contribution from the Ni-3d states is consistent with experiment in that the Hall coefficient remains positive at all temperatures, with a semiconductor-like temperature dependence reminiscent of under- and optimally-doped layered cuprates. Aside from the appearance of these small Nd-derived pockets at the zone corners, the Fermi surface of Nd₆Ni₅O₁₂ is analogous to that of multilayer cuprates with one electron-like and four hole-like $d_{x^2-y^2}$ Fermi surface sheets. Importantly, the Fermi surface of the quintuple-layer nickelate is much more two-dimensional-like compared to the infinite-layer nickelate material, as the presence of the fluorite blocking slab reduces the c-axis dispersion, as mentioned above.

2.3 The n = 3 Material, the Next Superconducting Member of the Series?

The materials discussed above can be put into the context of earlier studies of bulk reduced RP phases with n = 2, 3 NiO₂ layers [5, 74–76], separated by fluorite ${\mathcal{R}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2$ blocking slabs that enforce quasi-2D electronic and magnetic behavior.

The n = 3 member of the series, ${\mathcal{R}}_4{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}}_3{\mathrm{O}}_8$ (with Ni^1.33+: d^8.67 filling), has been studied extensively over the past decade (both single crystal and polycrystralline samples) [74]. Since the charge-transfer energy decreases with decreasing n [73], the n = 3 class is more cuprate-like than its n = ∞ and n = 5 counterparts. Both La and Pr materials are rather similar regarding their high-energy physics, with a large orbital polarization of the Ni-e_g states, so that the d⁸ admixture is low spin [75, 77] (but see Ref. [78]). The primary difference is that La₄Ni₃O₈ exhibits long-range stripe order [76, 79] (similar to that seen in 1/3 hole-doped La₂NiO₄), consisting of diagonal rows of Ni¹⁺ (S = 1/2) and Ni²⁺ (S = 0) in a two to one ratio [80]. In contrast, the Pr counterpart appears to have short-range order instead [81]. This results in the La material being insulating [82] in its low-temperature charge-ordered phase [80], whereas Pr₄Ni₃O₈ remains metallic at all temperatures [75], with an intriguing linear T behavior in its resistivity for intermediate temperatures (similar to that of cuprates at a comparable hole doping). Nd samples have also been studied [83], but the degree of insulating/metallic behavior seems to be sample dependent.

The difference between La and Pr trilayer materials could be due to the reduced volume associated with Pr (one of the motivations for the authors of Ref. [8] to study Sr-doped NdNiO₂ rather than Sr-doped LaNiO₂). The Ni spin state and metal versus insulator character have indeed been calculated to be sensitive to modest pressure [77]. Another factor is possible mixed valency of Pr as observed in cuprates (though Pr-M edge data on Pr₄Ni₃O₈ did not indicate mixed valent behavior [75]). Because of its decreased charge-transfer energy relative to n = 5, the rare-earth derived pockets no longer occur [84] (see Figure 2). This lack of $\mathcal{R}$-5d involvement is confirmed by the Hall coefficient that stays positive at all temperatures [44], (it remains to be understood why the thermopower in the case of La₄Ni₃O₈ is always negative [82], also seen in the metallic phase). In addition, these trilayer nickelates show a reduced charge-transfer energy (∼ 3.5 eV as obtained from a Wannier analysis [73]) that, along with the larger effective doping level, is consistent with the strong oxygen K edge pre-peak seen in x-ray absorption data [75]. Oxygen K edge RIXS data indicate a significant contribution of oxygen 2p states to the doped holes [85]. As the effective hole doping level is 1/3, these materials are outside the range where superconductivity would be expected (see Figure 1). Reaching the desired doping range for superconductivity might be possible via electron doping. This could be achieved by replacing the rare earth with a 4 + ion (such as Ce,Th, or Zr) [86], intercalating with lithium, or gating the material with an ionic liquid.

If superconductivity were to occur, one might hope for a higher T_c as has indeed been predicted via t − J model calculations [87]. Recent RIXS measurements [81], though, and find a superexchange value for n = 3 nearly the same as that reported for the infinite-layer material. This suggests the possibility that T_c in the whole nickelate family may be confined to relatively low temperatures compared to the cuprates. The similar value of the superexchange for n = ∞ and n = 3 is somewhat of a puzzle. Though their t_pd hoppings are very similar, the difference in the charge-transfer energy should have resulted in a larger superexchange for n = 3. The fact that it is not larger is one of the intriguing questions to be resolved in these low valence layered nickelates.

2.4 The n = 2 Material

The n = 2 member of the series, La₃Ni₂O₆, has been synthesized and studied as well [5, 88]. In terms of filling, it lies further away from optimal d-filling, being nominally Ni^1.5+: d^8.5. Experimentally, it is a semiconductor with no trace of a transition occurring at any temperature, although NMR data suggest that the AFM correlations are similar to those of the n = 3 material. Electronic structure studies [80] have predicted its ground state to have a charge-ordered pattern with Ni²⁺ cations in a low-spin state and the Ni¹⁺: d⁹ cations forming a S = 1/2 checkerboard pattern. This charge-ordering between S = 1/2 Ni¹⁺: d⁹ and non-magnetic Ni²⁺: d⁸ cations is similar to the situation in the n = 3 material [80]. Calculations suggest that it is quite general in these layered nickelates that the Ni²⁺ cations in this square-planar environment are non-magnetic. This has been shown by ab initio calculations to be the case also with the Ni²⁺ dopants in the $\mathcal{R}{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_2$ materials [53].

2.5 The n = 1 Case

The long-known ${\mathcal{R}}_2{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{O}}_4$ materials, with the n = 1 formula as above, contain Ni ions with octahedral coordination. We instead consider Ba₂NiO₂(AgSe)₂ (BNOAS) [89], as it represents the extreme opposite of the n = ∞ member, not only in regards to its d⁸ valence, but also because its square planar coordination with long Ni-O bond is thought to promote “high-spin” (magnetic) behavior, that is, one hole in $d_{x^2-y^2}$, and one hole in $d_{z^2}$. Unlike the other n cases, the charge balanced formula is (BaAg₂Se₂)⁰(BaNiO₂)⁰; both blocking and active layers are formally neutral. BNOAS is insulating, distinguished by a magnetic susceptibiliy that is constant, thus non-magnetic, above and below a peak at T* ∼130 K. This increase from and subsequent decrease to its high-T value reflects some kind of magnetic reconstruction at T* that was initially discussed in terms of canting of high-spin moments. That interpretation does not account for the constant susceptibility above and below the peak.

Valence counting indicates Ni²⁺: d⁸, so a half-filled e_g manifold. Conventional expectations are either 1) both 3d holes are in the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital–a magnetically dead singlet that cannot account for the behavior around T*, or 2) a Hund’s rule S = 1 triplet, which would show a Curie-Weiss susceptibility above the ordering temperature, but that is not seen in experiment. Correlated DFT calculations [90] predict an unusual Ni d⁸ singlet: a singly occupied $d_{z^2}$ orbital anti-aligned with a $d_{x^2-y^2}$ spin. This “off-diagonal singlet” consists of two fully spin-polarized 3d orbitals singlet-coupled, giving rise to a “non-magnetic” ion, however one having an internal orbital texture. Such tendencies were earlier noted [51] in LaNiO₂, and related Ni spin states were observed to be sensitive to modest pressure in the n = 2 and n = 3 classes [77]. Attempts are underway [91, 92] to understand this “magnetic transition in a non-magnetic insulator”.

3 Outlook

While this new nickelate family seems to be emerging as its own class of superconductors, its connections to cuprates (crystal and electronic structures, formal d count in the superconducting region, and AFM correlations) retain a focus on similarities between the two classes. Apart from the obvious structural analogy, the cuprate-motivated prediction of optimal d^8.8 filling has been realized in two nickelate materials, one achieved through chemical doping, and the other by layering dimensionality. In this context, the (so far) little studied n = 6 and n = 4 members of the series [73] may provide some prospect for superconductivity. Oxygen-reduced samples of these materials are so far lacking (though the n = 4 member of the RP series has been epitaxially grown [93]), and even if they are synthesized, they might require additional chemical tuning to achieve superconductivity. They share a similar electronic structure to the n = 5 material, but with slightly different nominal filling of the 3d bands [73]. Calculations show that as n decreases from n = ∞ to n = 3, the cuprate-like character increases, with the charge-transfer energy decreasing along with the self-doping effect from the rare earth 5d states. In contrast, the particular n = 1 member discussed above seems distinct from other nickelates, and provides a different set of questions in the context of quantum materials [91, 92].

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

AB was supported by the United States National Science Foundation, Grant No. DMR 2045826. K-WL was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea, and Grant No. NRF2019R1A2C1009588. MN was supported by the Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, United States Department of Energy. VP acknowledges support from the MINECO of Spain through the project PGC2018-101 334-BC21. WP acknowledges support from United States National Science Foundation, Grant No. DMR 1607139.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Greenblatt M. Ruddlesden-Popper Ln_n+1Ni_nO_3n+1 Nickelates: Structure and Properties. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci (1997) 2:174–83. doi:10.1016/s1359-0286(97)80062-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Hayward MA, Green MA, Rosseinsky MJ, Sloan J. Sodium Hydride as a Powerful Reducing Agent for Topotactic Oxide Deintercalation: Synthesis and Characterization of the Nickel(I) Oxide LaNiO₂. J Am Chem Soc (1999) 121:8843–54. doi:10.1021/ja991573i

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Crespin M, Levitz P, Gatineau L. Reduced Forms of LaNiO₃ perovskite. Part 1.-Evidence for New Phases: La₂Ni₂O₅ and LaNiO₂. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2 (1983) 79:1181–94. doi:10.1039/f29837901181

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Crespin M, Isnard O, Dubois F, Choisnet J, Odier P. LaNiO₂: Synthesis and Structural Characterization. J Solid State Chem (2005) 178:1326–34. doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2005.01.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Poltavets VV, Lokshin KA, Dikmen S, Croft M, Egami T, Greenblatt M. La₃Ni₂O₆: A New Double T'-type Nickelate with Infinite Ni^1+/2+O₂ Layers. J Am Chem Soc (2006) 128:9050–1. doi:10.1021/ja063031o

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kawai M, Matsumoto K, Ichikawa N, Mizumaki M, Sakata O, Kawamura N, et al. Orientation Change of an Infinite-Layer Structure LaNiO₂ Epitaxial Thin Film by Annealing with CaH₂. Cryst Growth Des (2010) 10:2044–6. doi:10.1021/cg100178y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ikeda A, Manabe T, Naito M. Improved Conductivity of Infinite-Layer LaNiO₂ Thin Films by Metal Organic Decomposition. Physica C: Superconductivity (2013) 495:134–40. doi:10.1016/j.physc.2013.09.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Li D, Lee K, Wang BY, Osada M, Crossley S, Lee HR, et al. Superconductivity in an Infinite-Layer Nickelate. Nature (2019) 572:624–7. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1496-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Zeng SW, Li CJ, Chow LE, Cao Y, Zhang ZT, Tang CS, et al. Superconductivity In Infinite-Layer Lanthanide Nickelates. arXiv:2105.13492 (2021).

Google Scholar

10. Osada M, Wang BY, Goodge BH, Harvey SP, Lee K, Li D, et al. Nickelate Superconductivity without Rare‐Earth Magnetism: (La,Sr)NiO₂. Adv Mater (2021) 33:2104083. doi:10.1002/adma.202104083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Osada M, Wang BY, Goodge BH, Lee K, Yoon H, Sakuma K, et al. A Superconducting Praseodymium Nickelate with Infinite Layer Structure. Nano Lett (2020) 20:5735–40. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Li D, Wang BY, Lee K, Harvey SP, Osada M, Goodge BH, et al. Superconducting Dome in Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₂ Infinite Layer Films. Phys Rev Lett (2020) 125:027001. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.027001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Zeng S, Tang CS, Yin X, Li C, Li M, Huang Z, et al. Phase Diagram and Superconducting Dome of Infinite-Layer Nd_1−xSr_xNiO₂ Thin Films. Phys Rev Lett (2020) 125:147003. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.147003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Norman MR. Entering the Nickel Age of Superconductivity. Physics (2020) 13:85. doi:10.1103/physics.13.85

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Pickett WE. The Dawn of the Nickel Age of Superconductivity. Nat Rev Phys (2021) 3:7–8. doi:10.1038/s42254-020-00257-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lee K, Goodge BH, Li D, Osada M, Wang BY, Cui Y, et al. Aspects of the Synthesis of Thin Film Superconducting Infinite-Layer Nickelates. APL Mater (2020) 8:041107. doi:10.1063/5.0005103

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Goodge BH, Li D, Lee K, Osada M, Wang BY, Sawatzky GA, et al. Doping Evolution of the Mott-Hubbard Landscape in Infinite-Layer Nickelates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2021) 118:e2007683118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2007683118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hepting M, Li D, Jia CJ, Lu H, Paris E, Tseng Y, et al. Electronic Structure of the Parent Compound of Superconducting Infinite-Layer Nickelates. Nat Mater (2020) 19:381–5. doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0585-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Fu Y, Wang L, Cheng H, Pei S, Zhou X, Chen J, et al. Core-Level X-Ray Photoemission And Raman Spectroscopy Studies On Electronic Structures In Mott-Hubbard Type Nickelate Oxide NdNiO₂. arXiv:1911.03177 (2019).

Google Scholar

20. Li Q, He C, Si J, Zhu X, Zhang Y, Wen H-H. Absence of Superconductivity in Bulk Nd_1−xSr_xNiO₂. Commun Mater (2020) 1:16. doi:10.1038/s43246-020-0018-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wang B-X, Zheng H, Krivyakina E, Chmaissem O, Lopes PP, Lynn JW, et al. Synthesis and characterization of bulk Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₂ and Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₃. Phys Rev Mater (2020) 4:084409. doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.084409

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gu Q, Li Y, Wan S, Li H, Guo W, Yang H, et al. Single Particle Tunneling Spectrum of Superconducting Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₂ Thin Films. Nat Commun (2020) 11:6027. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19908-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Jiang P, Si L, Liao Z, Zhong Z. Electronic Structure of Rare-Earth Infinite-Layer RNiO₂(R=La,Nd). Phys Rev B (2019) 100:201106. doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.201106

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Liu Z, Ren Z, Zhu W, Wang Z, Yang J. Electronic and Magnetic Structure of Infinite-Layer NdNiO₂: Trace of Antiferromagnetic Metal. Npj Quan Mater. (2020) 5:31. doi:10.1038/s41535-020-0229-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Nomura Y, Hirayama M, Tadano T, Yoshimoto Y, Nakamura K, Arita R. Formation of a Two-Dimensional Single-Component Correlated Electron System and Band Engineering in the Nickelate Superconductor NdNiO₂. Phys Rev B (2019) 100:205138. doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.205138

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wu X, Di Sante D, Schwemmer T, Hanke W, Hwang HY, Raghu S, et al. Robust d_x²-y²-wave Superconductivity Of Infinite-Layer Nickelates. Phys Rev B (2020) 101:060504. doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.060504

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Choi M-Y, Lee K-W, Pickett WE. Role of 4f States in Infinite-Layer NdNiO₂. Phys Rev B (2020) 101:020503. doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.020503

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Ryee S, Yoon H, Kim TJ, Jeong MY, Han MJ. Induced Magnetic Two-Dimensionality By Hole Doping In The Superconducting Infinite-Layer Nickelate Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₂. Phys Rev B (2020) 101:064513. doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.064513

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Gu Y, Zhu S, Wang X, Hu J, Chen H. A Substantial Hybridization between Correlated Ni-D Orbital and Itinerant Electrons in Infinite-Layer Nickelates. Commun Phys (2020) 3:84. doi:10.1038/s42005-020-0347-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Leonov I, Skornyakov SL, Savrasov SY. Lifshitz Transition and Frustration of Magnetic Moments in Infinite-Layer NdNiO₂ upon Hole Doping. Phys Rev B (2020) 101:241108. doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.241108

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Lechermann F. Late Transition Metal Oxides with Infinite-Layer Structure: Nickelates versus Cuprates. Phys Rev B (2020) 101:081110. doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.081110

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Lechermann F. Multiorbital Processes Rule the Nd_1−xSr_xNiO₂ normal State. Phys Rev X (2020) 10:041002. doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.041002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hu Y, Liu G, Hao W, Liu Y, Liu Z. Experimental Study on Regression Model of Ultraviolet Laser Processing Thermal Barrier Coating Based on Response Surface Method. J Phys Conf Ser (2019) 1187:032046. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1187/3/032046

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sakakibara H, Usui H, Suzuki K, Kotani T, Aoki H, Kuroki K. Model Construction and a Possibility of Cupratelike Pairing in a New d⁹ Nickelate Superconductor (Nd, Sr)NiO₂. Phys Rev Lett (2020) 125:077003. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.077003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Jiang M, Berciu M, Sawatzky GA. Critical Nature of the Ni Spin State in Doped NdNiO₂. Phys Rev Lett (2020) 124:207004. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.207004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Werner P, Hoshino S. Nickelate Superconductors: Multiorbital Nature and Spin Freezing. Phys Rev B (2020) 101:041104. doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.041104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zhang H, Jin L, Wang S, Xi B, Shi X, Ye F, et al. Effective Hamiltonian for Nickelate Oxides Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₂. Phys Rev Res (2020) 2:013214. doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013214

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Karp J, Botana AS, Norman MR, Park H, Zingl M, Millis A. Many-Body Electronic Structure of NdNiO₂ and CaCuO₂. Phys Rev X (2020) 10:021061. doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.021061

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Botana AS, Norman MR. Similarities and Differences between LaNiO₂ and CaCuO₂ and Implications for Superconductivity. Phys Rev X (2020) 10:011024. doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.011024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Wang Y, Kang C-J, Miao H, Kotliar G. Hund's Metal Physics: From SrNiO₂ to LaNiO₂. Phys Rev B (2020) 102:161118. doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.161118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Olevano V, Bernardini F, Blase X, Cano A. Ab Initio many-body GW Correlations in the Electronic Structure of LaNiO₂. Phys Rev B (2020) 101:161102(R). doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.161102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Zhang Y-H, Vishwanath A. Type-II t-J model in Superconducting Nickelate Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₂. Phys Rev Res (2020) 2:023112. doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023112

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Petocchi F, Christiansson V, Nilsson F, Aryasetiawan F, Werner P. Normal State of Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₂ from Self-Consistent GW+EDMFT. Phys Rev X (2020) 10:041047. doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.041047

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Pan GA, Segedin DF, LaBollita H, Song Q, Nica EM, Goodge BH, et al. Superconductivity in a Quintuple-layer Square-planar Nickelate. Nat Mater (published online) (2021). doi:10.1038/s41563-021-01142-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Zhang J, Tao X. Review on quasi-2D Square Planar Nickelates. CrystEngComm (2021) 23:3249–64. doi:10.1039/d0ce01880e

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Nomura Y, Arita R. Superconductivity In Infinite-Layer Nickelates. arXiv:2107.12923 (2021).

Google Scholar

47. Gu Q, Wen H-H. Superconductivity In Nickel Based 112 Systems. arXiv:2109.07654 (2021).

Google Scholar

48. Botana AS, Bernardini F, Cano A. Nickelate Superconductors: An Ongoing Dialog between Theory and Experiments. J Exp Theor Phys (2021) 132:618–27. doi:10.1134/s1063776121040026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Osada M, Wang BY, Lee K, Li D, Hwang HY. Phase Diagram of Infinite Layer Praseodymium Nickelate Pr_1−xSr_xNiO₂ Thin Films. Phys Rev Mater (2020) 4:121801. doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.121801

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Lu H, Rossi M, Nag A, Osada M, Li DF, Lee K, et al. Magnetic Excitations in Infinite-Layer Nickelates. Science (2021) 373:213–6. doi:10.1126/science.abd7726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Lee K-W, Pickett WE. Infinite-layer LaNiO₂: Ni¹⁺ is not Cu²⁺. Phys Rev B (2004) 70:165109. doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.165109

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Anisimov VI, Bukhvalov D, Rice TM. Electronic Structure of Possible Nickelate Analogs to the Cuprates. Phys Rev B (1999) 59:7901–6. doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.7901

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Krishna J, LaBollita H, Fumega AO, Pardo V, Botana AS. Effects of Sr Doping on the Electronic and Spin-State Properties of Infinite-Layer Nickelates: Nature of Holes. Phys Rev B (2020) 102:224506. doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.224506

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Weber C, Yee C, Haule K, Kotliar G. Scaling of the Transition Temperature of Hole-Doped Cuprate Superconductors with the Charge-Transfer Energy. Epl (2012) 100:37001. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/100/37001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Been E, Lee WS, Hwang HY, Cui Y, Zaanen J, Deveraux T, et al. Electronic Structure Trends Across the Rare-Earth Series in Superconducting Infinite-Layer Nickelates. Phys Rev X (2021) 11:011050. doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.011050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Higashi K, Winder M, Kunes J, Hariki A. Core-Level X-Ray Spectroscopy of Infinite-Layer Nickelate: LDA + DMFT Study. Phys Rev X (2021) 11:041009. doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Kang B, Melnick C, Semon P, Ryee S, Han MJ, Kotliar G, et al. Infinite-Layer Nickelates As Ni-e_g Hund’s Metals arXiv:2007.14610 (2021).

Google Scholar

58. Ryee S, Han MJ, Choi S. Hund Physics Landscape of Two-Orbital Systems. Phys Rev Lett (2021) 126:206401. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.206401

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Liu Z, Xu C, Cao C, Zhu W, Wang ZF, Yang J. Doping Dependence of Electronic Structure of Infinite-layer NdNiO₂. Phys Rev B (2021) 103:045103. doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.045103

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Kang C-J, Kotliar G. Optical Properties of the Infinite-Layer La_1−xSr_xNiO₂ and Hidden Hund's Physics. Phys Rev Lett (2021) 126:127401. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.127401

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Plienbumrung T, Daghofer M, Oleś AM. Interplay between Zhang-Rice Singlets and High-Spin States in a Model for Doped NiO₂ Planes. Phys Rev B (2021) 103:104513. doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.104513

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Zhao D, Zhou YB, Fu Y, Wang L, Zhou XF, Cheng H, et al. Intrinsic Spin Susceptibility and Pseudogaplike Behavior in Infinite-Layer LaNiO₂. Phys Rev Lett (2021) 126:197001. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.197001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Lin H, Gawryluk DJ, Klein YM, Huangfu S, Pomjakushina E, von Rohr F, et al. Universal Spin-Glass Behaviour In Bulk LaNiO₂, PrNiO₂, and NdNiO₂. arXiv:2104.14324 (2021).

Google Scholar

64. Zhang R, Lane C, Singh B, Nokelainen J, Barbiellini B, Markiewicz RS, et al. Magnetic and F-Electron Effects in LaNiO₂ and NdNiO₂ Nickelates with Cuprate-like 3d_x²-y² Band. Commun Phys (2021) 4:118. doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00621-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Choi M-Y, Pickett WE, Lee K-W. Fluctuation-frustrated Flat Band Instabilities in NdNiO₂. Phys Rev Res (2020) 2:033445. doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033445

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Wu X, Di Sante D, Schwemmer T, Hanke W, Hwang HY, Raghu S, et al. Robust d_x²-y² -wave Superconductivity of Infinite-layer Nickelates. Phys Rev B (2020) 101:060504. doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.060504

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Gu Q, Li Y, Wan S, Li H, Guo W, Yang H, et al. Single Particle Tunneling Spectrum of Superconducting Nd_1-xSr_xNiO₂ Thin Films. Nat Commun (2020) 11:6027. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19908-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. He R, Jiang P, Lu Y, Song Y, Chen M, Jin M, et al. Polarity-Induced Electronic and Atomic Reconstruction at NdNiO₂/SrTiO₃ Interfaces. Phys Rev B (2020) 102:035118. doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.035118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Bernardini F, Cano A. Stability and Electronic Properties of LaNiO₂/SrTiO₃ Heterostructures. J Phys Mater (2020) 3:03LT01. doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab9d0f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Geisler B, Pentcheva R. Correlated Interface Electron gas in Infinite-Layer Nickelate Versus Cuprate Films on SrTiO₃(001). Phys Rev Res (2021) 3:013261. doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013261

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Ortiz RA, Menke H, Misják F, Mantadakis DT, Fürsich K, Schierle E, et al. Superlattice Approach to Doping Infinite-Layer Nickelates. Phys Rev B (2021) 104:165137. doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.165137

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Ren X, Gao Q, Zhao Y, Hailan Luo XZ, Zhu Z. Superconductivity in Infinite-Layer Pr_{0.8}Sr_{0.2}NiO₂ Films on Different Substrates. arXiv:2109.05761 (2021).

Google Scholar

73. LaBollita H, Botana AS. Tuning the Van Hove Singularities in AV₃Sb₅ (A=K, Rb, Cs) via Pressure and Doping. Phys Rev B (2021) 104:035148. doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.205129

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Poltavets VV, Lokshin KA, Croft M, Mandal TK, Egami T, Greenblatt M. Crystal Structures of Ln₄Ni₃O₈ (Ln = La, Nd) Triple Layer T'-type Nickelates. Inorg Chem (2007) 46:10887–91. doi:10.1021/ic701480v

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Zhang J, Botana AS, Freeland JW, Phelan D, Zheng H, Pardo V, et al. Large Orbital Polarization in a Metallic Square-Planar Nickelate. Nat Phys (2017) 13:864–9. doi:10.1038/nphys4149

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Zhang J, Chen Y-S, Phelan D, Zheng H, Norman MR, Mitchell JF. Stacked Charge Stripes in the quasi-2D Trilayer Nickelate La₄Ni₃O₈. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2016) 113:8945–50. doi:10.1073/pnas.1606637113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Pardo V, Pickett WE. Pressure-Induced Metal-Insulator and Spin-State Transition in Low-Valence Layered Nickelates. Phys Rev B (2012) 85:045111. doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.045111

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Karp J, Hampel A, Zingl M, Botana AS, Park H, Norman MR, et al. Comparative many-body Study of Pr₄Ni₃O₈ and NdNiO₂. Phys Rev B (2020) 102:245130. doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.245130

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Zhang J, Pajerowski DM, Botana AS, Zheng H, Harriger L, Rodriguez-Rivera J, et al. Spin Stripe Order in a Square Planar Trilayer Nickelate. Phys Rev Lett (2019) 122:247201. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.247201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Botana AS, Pardo V, Pickett WE, Norman MR. Charge Ordering in Ni¹⁺/Ni²⁺ Nickelates: La₄Ni₃O₈ and La₃Ni₂O₆. Phys Rev B (2016) 94:081105. doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.081105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Lin JQ, Villar Arribi P, Fabbris G, Botana AS, Meyers D, Miao H, et al. Strong Superexchange in a d^9-δ Nickelate Revealed by Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering. Phys Rev Lett (2021) 126:087001. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.087001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Cheng J-G, Zhou J-S, Goodenough JB, Zhou HD, Matsubayashi K, Uwatoko Y, et al. Pressure Effect on the Structural Transition and Suppression of the High-Spin State in the Triple-LayerT′−La₄Ni₃O₈. Phys Rev Lett (2012) 108:236403. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.236403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Retoux R, Rodriguez-Carvajal J, Lacorre P. Neutron Diffraction and TEM Studies of the Crystal Structure and Defects of Nd₄Ni₃O₈. J Solid State Chem (1998) 140:307–15. doi:10.1006/jssc.1998.7892

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Pardo V, Pickett WE. Quantum Confinement Induced Molecular Correlated Insulating State in La₄Ni₃O₈. Phys Rev Lett (2010) 105:266402. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.266402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Shen Y, Sears J, Fabbris G, Li J, Pelliciari J, Jarrige I, et al. Role of Oxygen States in Square Planar d⁹-Delta Nickelates. arXiv:2110.08937 (2021).

Google Scholar

86. Botana AS, Pardo V, Norman MR. Electron Doped Layered Nickelates: Spanning the Phase Diagram of the Cuprates. Phys Rev Mater (2017) 1:021801. doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.1.021801

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Nica EM, Krishna J, Yu R, Si Q, Botana AS, Erten O. Theoretical Investigation of Superconductivity in Trilayer Square-Planar Nickelates. Phys Rev B (2020) 102:020504. doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.020504

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Crocker J, Dioguardi A, Shirer K, Poltavets V, Greenblatt M, Klavins P, et al. NMR Evidence for Spin Fluctuations in the Bilayer Nickelate La₃Ni₂O₆. Phys Rev B (2013) 88:075124.

Google Scholar

89. Matsumoto Y, Yamamoto T, Nakano K, Takatsu H, Murakami T, Hongo K, et al. High‐Pressure Synthesis of A₂ NiO₂ Ag₂ Se₂ (A=Sr, Ba) with a High‐Spin Ni²⁺ in Square‐Planar Coordination. Angew Chem Int Ed (2019) 58:756–9. doi:10.1002/anie.201810161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Jin H-S, Pickett WE, Lee K-W. Proposed Ordering of Textured Spin Singlets in a Bulk Infinite-Layer Nickelate. Phys Rev Res (2020) 2:033197. doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033197

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Tu W-L, Moon E-G, Lee K-W, Pickett WE, Lee H-Y Field-Induced Bose-Einstein Condensation and Supersolid in the Two-Dimensional Kondo Necklace. arXiv:2107.11936 (2021).

Google Scholar

92. Singh RRP Magnetism of Competing High-Spin/Low-Spin States in Ba₂NiO₂(AgSe)₂ and Related Two-Orbital Two-Electron Systems. arXiv:2108.09706 (2021).

Google Scholar

93. Li Z, Guo W, Zhang TT, Song JH, Gao TY, Gu ZB, et al. Epitaxial Growth and Electronic Structure of Ruddlesden-Popper Nickelates (Ln_n+1Ni_nO_3n+1, n = 1-5). APL Mater (2020) 8:091112. doi:10.1063/5.0018934

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar