Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Phys., 30 May 2025

Sec. Medical Physics and Imaging

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2025.1613530

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances of Synchrotron Radiation-Based X-Ray Imaging in Biomedical ResearchView all 7 articles

Editorial: Advances of synchrotron radiation-based X-ray imaging in biomedical research

  • 1Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A, Trieste, Italy
  • 2Department of Clinical and Interventional Radiology, University Medicine Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
  • 3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 4Translational Molecular Imaging, MPI for Multidisciplinary Research, Goettingen, Germany
  • 5Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
  • 6Department of Physics, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
  • 7INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
  • 8Institute of Nanotechnology, CNR, Rome, Italy
  • 9Neuroimaging Laboratory, Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Rome, Italy

Synchrotron radiation-based X-ray imaging, particularly X-ray phase-contrast microtomography (PC-µCT), is of interest in biomedical research thanks to its non-destructive 3D hierarchical visualization power [1, 2]. Unlike laboratory microCT, PC-µCT enables high spatial resolution imaging with intense throughput [3]; thus, aiding the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for image analysis. Phase contrast enhances the discernment of soft tissue structures, making morphological characterization effective even without additional stainings [46].

These aspects allow PC-µCT to supplement traditional histology with 3D data, leading to the emergence of “virtual histology” as a complementary approach in the synchrotron imaging community [79]. However, sample preparation for multiscale and multi-techniques studies still remains a challenge.

The study by Young Lee et al. presents a step-by-step protocol for 3D virtual histology of unstained human brain tissue [10]. Initially designed for the SYRMEP beamline in Trieste, the protocol is also adaptable to other µCT imaging beamlines. It includes tissue preparation, µCT acquisition, reconstruction, post-processing, and validation against histology. The authors demonstrate how blood vessels and neurons appear in images acquired with isotropic voxel sizes of 5 μm3 and 1 μm3. Additionally, it facilitates the investigation of biological substrates such as neuromelanin and corpora amylacea, enabling the study of their spatial distribution using tailored segmentation tools validated by classical histology methods. This approach provides a means to explore the intricate architecture of brain tissue, offering valuable insights into its organization and potential pathological alterations.

The Research Topic also received contributions regarding the optimization of novel sample preparation methods: in one case for producing enhanced contrast in the visualization of specific sample features; in the other for boosting multi-modal investigations.

The paper by Fratini et al. focuses on optimizing sample preparation protocols to improve contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in PC-µCT imaging of white matter (WM) in the central nervous system (CNS) [11]. The study emphasizes the critical role of tissue fixation and dehydration in enhancing CNR for XPCT, which is essential for visualizing delicate WM structures like fibers. Key methodological optimizations include the selection of a fixative protocol involving ethanol perfusion followed by xylene dehydration. This approach preserves tissue architecture while effectively removing water, thereby enhancing phase contrast without the need for exogenous contrast agents. Additionally, structural alterations are minimized through the ethanol-xylene treatment, which helps prevent shrinkage or distortion commonly observed with other fixatives, thus preserving fine gray matter (GM) and WM details. The method improved the visibility of pathological features relevant to neurodegenerative diseases, such as demyelination or axonal damage. It enables high-resolution 3D imaging of WM microstructures, supporting preclinical research into conditions like multiple sclerosis or Alzheimer’s disease. By improving CNR, the technique enhances the detection of subtle pathological changes while preserving tissue for downstream analyses (e.g., histology).

Sagar et al. demonstrate that optical clearing improves propagation-based PC-μCT imaging by reducing artifacts like air bubbles and cracks found in traditional formalin-fixed paraffin embedding (FFPE) methods [12]. Using Phytagel embedding, they achieved high-quality imaging of colon cancer specimens while preserving compatibility with standard histology. This method enhances PC-μCT by providing clearer, artifact-free imaging for better analysis.

Subsequently, to the optimal technical choices improving image acquisition, the processing of tomographic datasets always plays a crucial role. In the post-processing step, the application of AI tools for object detection and sample feature segmentation can be extremely advantageous in order to perform quantitative volumetric analysis on large datasets.

Lopes Marinho et al. evaluated various convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for segmenting PC-µCT images of magnesium-based biodegradable bone implants in sheep tibiae [13]. Accurate segmentation is crucial for assessing implant degradation and osseointegration. The study compared models like U-Net, HR-Net, U2-Net, and both 2D and 3D versions of nnU-Net, using the intersection over union (IoU) metric to assess performance. Findings revealed that the 2D nnU-Net exhibited superior generalization capabilities, though all models faced challenges in accurately segmenting the degradation layer.

The study from Furlani et al. explores the biomechanical properties of collagenous tissues using PC-µCT combined with deep learning techniques to enhance the analysis of collagen bundles [14]. The paper demonstrates the ability to visualize collagen bundles in three dimensions across various body regions, applicable in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. The authors propose that deep learning-based semantic image segmentation can more effectively identify and classify collagen bundles compared to traditional thresholding methods. By employing neural networks, the study achieves quantification of structures in synchrotron phase-contrast images that were previously indistinguishable. Notably, this approach allows for the identification of collagen bundles based on their orientation, moving beyond the limitations of conventional techniques that rely solely on physical densities.

In conclusion, the Research Topic covers both the description of experimental approaches for image acquisition and computational post-processing segmentation pipelines. In addition, in the Research Topic an innovative approach is introduced that explores the feasibility of a dual-modal on-board imaging system combining spectral-CT and cone-beam CT (CBCT) using a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) photon-counting detector (PCD) integrated into a linear accelerator (Linac) by Monte Carlo simulations. This approach, presented in the paper of Ye et al., aims to address limitations in conventional CBCT imaging, such as metal artifacts, insufficient soft-tissue contrast, and lack of functional or molecular imaging capabilities, which can hinder the precision and effectiveness of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) [15]. The study uses the Geant4 Application for Tomography Emission (GATE) software to design and validate the proposed system. The CZT detector’s pixel size was optimized for a balance between photon detection efficiency and spatial resolution. Imaging performance was evaluated using a PMMA phantom containing calcium and contrast agents (iodine, gadolinium, gold), leveraging K-edge spectral imaging to differentiate materials. In conclusion, this novel approach could enhance IGRT by improving target delineation, treatment monitoring, and differentiation between tumor recurrence and treatment-related changes.

This Research Topic displays key advancements in PC-µCT imaging, from refined sample preparation to AI-powered analysis. Together, these studies reinforce PC-µCT as a powerful, non-destructive tool for virtual histology, offering deeper insights into tissue structure and disease.

Author contributions

EL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. CD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. MF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. We acknowledge the CERIC-ERIC consortium for the financial support received through the Integra project (Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste) www.ceric-eric.eu. Sandro Donato is supported by the project “Tech4You- Technologies for climate change adaptation and quality of life improvement” (C.I. ECS 00000009, CUP H23C22000370006).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Euro-BioImaging ERIC (https://ror.org/05d78xc36) for providing access to imaging technologies and services via the Phase Contrast Imaging Node in Trieste, Italy (Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A.). We also thank the Editorial Office of Frontiers in Physics for the kind invitation to launch and lead this Research Topic and for the support received in completing this Research Topic.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Walsh CL, Tafforeau P, Wagner WL, Jafree DJ, Bellier A, Werlein C, et al. Imaging intact human organs with local resolution of cellular structures using hierarchical phase-contrast tomography. Nat Methods (2021) 18:1532–41. doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01317-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Brunet J, Cook AC, Walsh CL, Cranley J, Tafforeau P, Engel K, et al. Multidimensional analysis of the Adult human Heart in Health and disease using hierarchical Phase-Contrast Tomography. Radiology (2024) 312:e232731. doi:10.1148/radiol.232731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Albers J, Nikolova M, Svetlove A, Darif N, Lawson MJ, Schneider TR, et al. High throughput tomography (HiTT) on EMBL beamline P14 on PETRA III. J Synchrotron Radiat (2024) 31(1):186–94. doi:10.1107/S160057752300944X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Cloetens P, Barrett R, Baruchel J, Guigay JP, Schlenker M. Phase objects in synchrotron radiation hard x-ray imaging. J Phys D: Appl Phys (1996) 29:133–46. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/29/1/023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Massimi L, Bukreeva I, Santamaria G, Fratini M, Corbelli A, Brun F, et al. Exploring Alzheimer's disease mouse brain through X-ray phase contrast tomography: from the cell to the organ. NeuroImage (2019) 184:490–5. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Palermo F, Marrocco N, Dacomo L, Grisafi E, Moresi V, Sanna A, et al. Investigating gut alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: in-depth analysis with micro- and nano-3D X-ray phase contrast tomography. Sci Adv (2025) 11:eadr8511. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adr8511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Albers J, Pacilé S, Markus MA, Wiart M, Vande Velde G, Tromba G, et al. X-ray-Based 3D Virtual Histology—Adding the Next Dimension to Histological Analysis. Mol Imaging Biol (2018) 20:732–41. doi:10.1007/s11307-018-1246-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Donato S, AranaPeña LM, Arfelli F, Brombal L, Colmo L, Longo R, et al. Integrating X-ray phase-contrast imaging and histology for comparative evaluation of breast tissue malignancies in virtual histology analysis. Scientific Rep (2024) 14:5831. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56341-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Saccomano G, Pinamonti M, Longo E, Marcuzzo T, Tromba G, Dreossi D, et al. The potential of X-ray Virtual Histology in the diagnosis of skin tumors. Skin Res Technology (2024) 30:e13801. doi:10.1111/srt.13801

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lee JY, Donato S, Mack AF, Mattheus U, Tromba G, Longo E, et al. Protocol for 3D virtual histology of unstained human brain tissue using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast microtomography. Front Phys (2024) 11:11. doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1335285

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Fratini M, Massimi L, Brun F, Batey D, Bukreeva I, Mittone A, et al. Optimising sample preparation to enhance Contrast-to-Noise ratio in X-ray Phase Contrast Tomography of White Matter (WM) Imaging of the Central Nervous System. Front Phys (2024) 13. doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1479573

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Sagar MMR, Svetlove A, D’Amico L, Pinkert-Leetsch D, Missbach-Guentner J, Longo E, et al. Optical clearing: an alternative sample preparation method for propagation based phase contrast μCT. Front Phys (2024) 12:12. doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1433895

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lopes Marinho A, Kazimi B, Ćwieka H, Marek R, Beckmann F, Willumeit-Römer R, et al. A comparison of deep learning segmentation models for synchrotron radiation based tomograms of biodegradable bone implants. Front Phys (2024) 12:12. doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1257512

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Furlani M, Riberti N, Di Nicola M, Giuliani A. Unraveling the biomechanical properties of collagenous tissues pathologies using synchrotron-based phase-contrast microtomography with deep learning. Front Phys (2023) 11:11. doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1220575

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ye F, Wang H, Fang J. Linac-integrated on-board spectral-CT/CBCT imaging using a photon-counting detector: a Monte Carlo study. Front Phys (2023) 11:11. doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1152676

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: X-ray imaging, X-ray computed tomography (CT), phase contrast techniques, preclinical, clinical and biomedical applications, artificial intelligence

Citation: Longo E, Dullin C, Donato S and Fratini M (2025) Editorial: Advances of synchrotron radiation-based X-ray imaging in biomedical research. Front. Phys. 13:1613530. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2025.1613530

Received: 17 April 2025; Accepted: 22 May 2025;
Published: 30 May 2025.

Edited and reviewed by:

Zhen Cheng, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Copyright © 2025 Longo, Dullin, Donato and Fratini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Elena Longo, ZWxlbmEubG9uZ29AZWxldHRyYS5ldQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.