In the past few decades, studies on sleep have been increasing in number, as an important crossroads of different disciplines including psychiatry, neurology, neuroscience, respiratory medicine, psychology, nursing, and public health (1, 2). Moving beyond studies of basic sleep science and sleep disorders, sleep health has emerged as a new direction that provides a more holistic framework for the main dimensions of sleep: regularity, satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration (1, 3). Given its growing importance, it is imperative to evaluate, consolidate, and further develop measures of sleep health so that the global sleep research community has more valid tools to deploy.
A growing body of research has revealed that poor sleep health is associated with poor health behaviors (e.g., smoking and alcohol consumption), negative psychological states (e.g., anxiety, depression, and perceived stress), chronic diseases (e.g., cardiovascular disease and diabetes), and physical injuries (e.g., road traffic injuries). Irregular sleep schedules, bedtime procrastination, and other unhealthy sleep behaviors such as widespread use of electronic devices and social media, may negatively impact sleep health in modern societies (4). As good sleep health is a critical cornerstone for overall health, routine monitoring, multi-level preventive measures, and interventions are needed to further elucidate an unmet public health problem and improve health equity (5).
To this end, our Research Topic “Sleep health and measures” includes original research articles, reviews, and opinion pieces that explore the current state of sleep health, its influencing factors, and key health outcomes. By identifying approaches to accurately measure, assess, and improve sleep health, the current Research Topic strives to further substantiate the significance of sleep health as a multidisciplinary field of research. In this editorial, we provide a brief overview of selected articles published on the Research Topic “Sleep health and measures” in the journal Frontiers in Public Health (https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/48787/sleep-health-and-measures/articles).
The study by Tesfaye et al. aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of poor sleep quality among healthcare professionals in Northwest Ethiopia. Using a cross-sectional design and stratified random sampling, data were collected from 418 participants using self-administered questionnaires. Results revealed a high prevalence of poor sleep quality (58.9%). Factors significantly associated with poor sleep quality included being female, shift work, a lack of regular exercise, khat chewing, and so on. The authors recommend early screening for sleep disturbances, better management of shift work schedules, and interventions targeting lifestyle behaviors and mental health support, to improve sleep quality among healthcare professionals.
Guo et al. investigated how sleep quality, perceived stress, and social support interact to influence depression in stroke patients. Conducted between January and May 2023 using cluster random sampling in five hospitals in Henan Province, China, this multicenter cross-sectional survey with 471 stroke patients revealed that poor sleep quality partially mediated the relationship between perceived stress and depression. Moreover, social support moderated this mediation effect. These findings suggest that improving sleep quality and social support may be key strategies to mitigate depression in stroke patients, providing a foundation for developing targeted intervention programs.
The study by Loke et al. reported on the development and validation of the Sleep Health And Wellness Questionnaire (SHAWQ) to identify sleep problems and potential depression risks in adolescents and university students. Using a 6-item questionnaire derived from key sleep and health predictors, the SHAWQ was tested in four studies involving 8,567 adolescents and university students. The tool demonstrated good convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and predictive validity (for academic performance), indicating that the SHAWQ is effective for screening for sleep health and mood issues in teenagers and young adults, which could guide interventions to improve sleep and mental health status in this at-risk segment of the population.
The systematic review by González-Martín et al. was an instrumental addition to this Research Topic. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of mindfulness-based programs on sleep quality in healthy, non-institutionalized older adults. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review included 10 out of 177 initially identified articles from four databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL) searched in May and June 2023. Overall, older adults who underwent mindfulness-based programs indicated significant improvements in sleep quality, with moderate effect sizes across different sleep assessment tools. The findings suggest that mindfulness may be an effective treatment for insomnia symptoms and other sleep quality issues in older adults.
The breadth of measurements, measurement strategies, and related health outcomes investigated in the articles included in this Research Topic, highlights not only the excitement surrounding sleep health, but also the challenges inherent in any emerging area of investigation. We encourage scholars to be intentional in their selection of both measures and outcomes. As the accumulation of knowledge is dependent on the ability to synthesize across studies, much progress in our understanding of sleep health can be made with small advances in conceptualization and measurement.
Statements
Author contributions
RM: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EYYL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JMD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Medical Research Fund of Zhejiang Province, Grant No. 2023RC073 and the Research Initiation Fund of Hangzhou Normal University, Grant No. RWSK20201003.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
GardaniMBradfordDRRRussellKAllanSBeattieLEllisJGet al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of poor sleep, insomnia symptoms and stress in undergraduate students. Sleep Med Rev. (2022) 61:101565. 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101565
2.
CarskadonMADementWC. Chapter 2 - Normal human sleep: an overview. In:KrygerMHRothTDementWC, editors. Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders (2005). p. 13–23. 10.1016/B0-72-160797-7/50009-4
3.
BuysseDJ. Sleep health: can we define it? Does it matter?Sleep. (2014) 37:9–17. 10.5665/sleep.3298
4.
BartelKAGradisarMWilliamsonP. Protective and risk factors for adolescent sleep: a meta-analytic review. Sleep Med Rev. (2015) 21:72–85. 10.1016/j.smrv.2014.08.002
5.
HaleLTroxelWBuysseDJ. Sleep health: an opportunity for public health to address health equity. Ann Rev Publ Health. (2020) 41:81–99. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094412
Summary
Keywords
sleep health, measures, quality of life, wellbeing, population health
Citation
Meng R, Ma H, Spruyt K, Lau EYY and Dzierzewski JM (2024) Editorial: Sleep health and measures. Front. Public Health 12:1476077. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1476077
Received
05 August 2024
Accepted
19 August 2024
Published
13 September 2024
Volume
12 - 2024
Edited and reviewed by
Christiane Stock, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Meng, Ma, Spruyt, Lau and Dzierzewski.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Runtang Meng mengruntang@hznu.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.