Physical activity level among male and female middle to high school students and impact of perceived school climate: a longitudinal analysis

Background: Physical activity levels are declining among middle and high school students, and schools could provide an ideal space for engaging adolescents in physical activity. The study aimed to assess physical activity levels among male and female middle to high school students and the impact of perceived school climate.

Methods: This longitudinal study utilized the Georgia Student Health Survey (GSHS) from 2016 to 2020, with change in the proportion of physically active students as an outcome and school climate measures as predictors. Factor analysis yielded a composite index for each school climate measure. Descriptive analysis measured the trend and male vs. female differences in physical activity. A multivariable linear regression model was developed to assess the impact of school climate on physical activity and male–female differences.

Results: The decline in physical activity with increasing grade levels was notably more pronounced in females than males. Improvement in the perception of school climate measures was consistently linked to an increased proportion of physically active students as they progressed to higher grades (for example, change in perception of school connectedness: β = 5.39; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The study findings underscore the importance of fostering positive school climates to mitigate the decline in physical activity levels, especially among adolescent females.

1 Introduction

Inactivity is a global concern; 3 in 4 adolescents (11–17 years old) do not meet the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended 60 min (mins) or more of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) (1, 2). Regular physical activity among adolescents could improve cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle mass growth, metabolic syndrome, and mental health (3–6). Regardless of the myriad benefits of being physically active, studies report a declining trend of physical activity among adolescents (7, 8). A study by the WHO among 1.6 million adolescents reported that 81% of 11-17-year-old school children are not meeting the recommended level of physical activity (7). Further, recent studies have reported that a higher proportion of female adolescents are not meeting the recommended physical activity levels compared to male adolescents (9, 10). A longitudinal study found a significant decline in mean minutes (mins) of MVPA between prepubertal and pubertal periods from 52.1 min to 42.6 min for girls, compared to 61.4 min to 49.3 min for boys (11). Such a decline in physical activity during the transition from childhood to adolescence is particularly concerning as many studies continue showing a positive impact of physical activity on physical and mental health (12–14). For example, a higher frequency of physical activity among adolescents was significantly associated with reduced odds of mood disorder, bipolar II disorder, and general psychological distress (5). There is a need to identify new areas of population health-based interventions in large settings to address global inactivity.

Schools could provide that opportunity for engaging adolescents in physical activity, as they offer structured settings and social opportunities that can significantly influence students’ behavior (15). According to Social Cognitive Theory, individuals are influenced by both personal and environmental factors, suggesting that the school climate, a key environmental factor, can shape students’ physical activity levels (16). A study by Owen et al. found that 73.7% of adolescents want to get involved in physical activity at school, and 88.8% want to do such physical activities with their friends (17). This indicates that peer relationships, a critical component of school climate, can compound students’ motivation to participate in physical activity. Further, schools can foster a motivational environment that prioritizes personal improvement and effort over competition (18). Such an environment fosters a supportive and inclusive atmosphere that could encourage all students to participate in physical activities, regardless of their skill levels (19). A study by van Sluijs et al. found that a school climate with a motivational environment and comprehensive school-based physical activity programs was associated with improved physical activity levels among students (20). These school climates include school support environment (rules and adult guidance present at school), school connectedness (likeness to school, feeling of fit and success, and connection with others at school), peer social support (connection with other students in the school), school physical environment (care and conditions for the school), cultural acceptance (perception of diversity acceptance at school), school safety (self-perceived safety of school, occurrence, and involvement in a fight at school), peer victimization (extent of bullying by peers), and adult social support (student’s perception of teachers’ attitude toward the students) (21).

A review by WHO found that school-based programs, such as increased physical education, active classrooms, and regular sports activities, significantly improved physical activity levels and academic achievement (22). This is corroborated by observational and experimental studies, which consistently demonstrate the positive impact of a supportive school climate on students’ physical activity levels and academic achievement (23–28). Further, studies have reported that school climate-related barriers, such as a lack of social support from friends and teachers, accessible places, and professional physical education teachers, are associated with declining physical activity levels among students (29, 30). The evidence strongly suggests that a positive school climate can significantly influence students’ physical activity levels. However, to our knowledge, there is no longitudinal research on the impact of school climate on adolescents’ physical activity levels. This study extends the existing body of knowledge on the association of school climate with student physical activity.

In the United States (US), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recommendation is consistent with the WHO recommendation of 60 min of MVPA (31), however, physical activity is consistently decreasing with age among adolescents in the United States (32) as it is globally. In the United States, the state of Georgia (GA) has high differences in physical activity levels among male vs. female adolescents; a majority (57%) of high school male students were physically active compared to only 35% of their female counterparts in 2017 (21). GA is also a state in the southern US with high rates of sedentarism among adolescents; 15.4% of children aged 5–17 are obese, 24% of high school students do not meet their 60 min of MVPA requirement, and 41.2% report using a computer for three or more hours for something other than related to school work (8). Thus, we base this study in Georgia to assess physical activity levels among male and female middle to high school students and the impact of perceived school climate.

2 Methods

2.1 Participants and study design

This study followed a longitudinal design to study the impact of school climate on adolescents’ physical activity (PA) levels using secondary data from an anonymous survey of middle and high-school students—the Georgia Student Health Survey (GSHS) 2.0 from 2016 through 2020. The GSHS is a standardized annual statewide anonymous survey developed by the Georgia Department of Education (GDoE) in collaboration with the Georgia Department of Public Health (GDPH) and research universities, and has been administered since 2001 by the GDoE (33). The GSHS survey is primarily used for School Climate Star Ratings for all Georgia Public Schools; participation is mandatory for public schools with passive parental permission and is optional for private schools (34, 35). The data is collected every school year from October to February; as such, the data for a calendar year also includes the last quarter of the previous year (35).

The data setup allowed longitudinal tracking of physical activity levels and school climate separately for male and female students within each grade as they advanced in grade (from 6th to 12th grade) within each participating school. Individual student responses were aggregated up to the class level separately for male and female students using the grade variable to aggregate individual responses. GSHS is an anonymous survey, and even though longitudinal analysis at the individual level is impossible, it provides opportunities for longitudinal analysis at the grade level. The students that make up a grade cluster could change year over year, but the study assumes that the cluster behavior does not change over time. The assumption is based on the homogeneity of the student body served by school districts in the US, where home addresses govern which school students go to, and homes in a school district have similar social determinants of health (36, 37).

Under GA code 20–2-291, high schools in GA contain any grade above grade eight, and middle school contains no grade below grade four or above grade eight (38). This standard definition of middle and high school grades helped to ensure uniformity across Georgia schools for setting up the data for longitudinal analysis. Grades four and five were excluded from the study data because GSHS collects data on those grades using an elementary school survey with limited questions on school climate measures. Amidst COVID-19, a shortened version of the “Voluntary Student Wellness Survey” was conducted, which replaced the GSHS 2.0 for 2021 and 2022 (34). Therefore, this study did not include data from 2021 and 2022. Data collection for 2020 was conducted from October 2019 to February 2020, and the school closure due to COVID-19 in Georgia started on March 18, 2020 (39). Therefore, COVID-19-related school closures had no impact on the response rate in 2020. The study data included 3,423,888 middle and high school students (51.25% females) from the schools with at least two consecutive years of data across the study period (2016–2020).

2.2 Study measures

We used self-reported PA and school climate measures from the GSHS. Specifically, the measure of PA was based on the response to the following question: “In the past 7 days, how many days were you physically active for at least 60 min at school or home?” with possible responses “Not at all,” “1 day per week,” “2–3 days per week,” and “4–5 days per week.” Though the highest response level of “4–5 days per week” does not completely align with the aforementioned WHO and CDC’s recommendations for PA for youth in this age group (2, 31), previous studies (21, 40, 41) have used it to define being physically active. Given this limitation, we dichotomized the responses into two categories: physically active (coded 1 if responded “4–5 days per week”) and less physically active (coded 0 for all other responses), instead of using met/not met the physical activity requirement.

2.2.1 Longitudinal outcome measure: change in physical activity

The outcome measure was the change in the proportion of physically active male and female students ( $\Delta N_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p$ ) as they advance in grade level, as illustrated in Equation 1. The change subtracts a lower grade (for example, grade 7^th) from a higher grade (for example, grade 8^th); therefore, a negative value in the change shows a decline in the proportion of physically active students (for example, if $N_{\mathit{\text{female}},7\mathit{th}\mathit{\text{grade}},2018,\mathit{\text{in school}}S}^p$ is 0.6 and $N_{\mathit{\text{female}},8\mathit{th}\mathit{\text{grade}},2019,\mathit{\text{in school}}S}^p$ is 0.5, the $\Delta N_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p$ by definition is −0.1).

$\begin{array}{ll}\Delta N_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p=(\frac{\sum {\left(P_{m/f}\right(G+1\left)\right(Y+1\left)\right)}_S}{\sum {\left(T_{m/f}\right(G+1\left)\right(Y+1\left)\right)}_S}-\frac{\sum {\left(P_{m/f}\mathit{GY}\right)}_S}{\sum {\left(T_{m/f}\mathit{GY}\right)}_S})\times 100& (1)\end{array}$

${\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{f}}$ and ${\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{f}}$ the number of physically active and total number of male and female students, respectively, in grade G in school year Y within school S; m/f = female/male, G = Grades 6th to 12th, and Y = 2016 to 2020.

2.2.2 Measures of school climate

Eight measures of school climate: school connectedness, peer social support, adult social support, cultural acceptance, physical environment, school safety, peer victimization, and school support environment were used, based on previous studies (21, 42–48). Students’ perception of each school climate measure was assessed on a four-point Likert scale, where a higher score denotes a higher level of agreement on perceptions, i.e., 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = somewhat disagree, 3 = somewhat agree, and 4 = strongly agree. The questions on school climate were measured across all study years (2016–2020). However, the questions were revised in 2019, resulting in the exclusion of 6 questions out of 44 questions that were assessed during 2016–2018. Our study is based on the 38 questions consistently asked across all study years (questions related to the study are presented in Appendix Table A1). We reordered some responses (identified in Appendix Table A1 with an asterisk) to ensure consistency across all questions such that positive responses were assigned higher values. For example, in the question “My school is well maintained,” the highest response (strongly agree) is positive and is thus assigned a higher value. However, for the question “I have felt unsafe at school or on my way to or from school,” the highest response (strongly agree) is negative and is reordered so that the strongly disagree (positive response) is assigned a higher value. GDoE conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses during their initial validation to group the school climate-related questions into these measures (48, 49). Further, reliability assessment by GDoE using measurement invariance analyses has found these questions and their respective school climate measures to be consistent overall and across race/ethnicity and male/female students (48).

There were four to seven questions for each school climate measure. We conducted principal component factor analyses for each school climate measure to reduce the dimensionality of the eight school climate measures, following the technique used in earlier studies using GSHS data (21, 40, 48). From the four to seven questions within each school climate measure, the principal component analysis yielded a single latent factor for each school climate measure that met the latent factor selection criteria of the factor with an Eigenvalue greater than one for each measure. Appendix Table B1 outlines the Eigenvalues of each latent factor. We used the resulting measure of latent indices for each student on each school climate measure to aggregate it up to the class level separately for female and male students within each grade. Similar to the change in the proportion of physically active students (longitudinal outcome measure), the change in perception of school climate between grades by gender was obtained by subtracting the average perception of school climate measures of a lower grade from a higher grade by gender. Therefore, a negative value in the change shows a decline in school climate perception.

2.3 Data analysis

A descriptive analysis of the proportion of physically active male and female students by grade was conducted, combined for all years and separately for each year. Then, we tested the grade level association and differences between male and female students using a multiple linear regression model (Equation 2) with the proportion of physically active students ( $N_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p)$ as a function of grade (G), male/female (m/f), and a categorical-by-categorical interaction term for grade and female gender. A negative coefficient on the interaction term would show a decline in the proportion of physically active students. Equation 2 was run separately for each year.

$\begin{array}{ll}{N}_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p={\beta }_0+{\beta }_{1}m/f_S+{\beta }_2{G}_S+{\beta }_3{(G\times \mathit{\text{female}})}_S& (2)\end{array}$

Second, we developed multiple unadjusted linear regression models (Equation 3) to test the association between the change in the perception of school climate measures ( $\mathit{\Delta S}{C}_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}$ ) and change in the proportion of physically active students ( $\Delta N_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p$ ) for the full data and data subsets for males and females. All these models were run separately for each school climate measure.

$\begin{array}{ll}\Delta N_{g/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p={\beta }_0+{\beta }_1\mathit{\Delta S}{C}_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}+{\beta }_2\mathit{\Delta Y}& (3)\end{array}$

In these models, the $\Delta$Y is the change in year due to grade transition (for example Grade 6 in 2016 transition to Grade 7 in 2017), i.e., 2016–2017, 2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020.

Lastly, following a change score method (50), we developed our final multiple linear regression models (Equation 4) with the change in the proportion of physically active students as a function of the change in perception of school climate measures ( $\mathit{\Delta S}{C}_{\mathit{\text{gGYS}}}$ ), proportion of physically active students in the previous grade (i.e., baseline), grade, male/female, and a categorical-by-continuous interaction term for male/female and change in perception of school climate measures. The models were run separately for each school climate measure.

$\begin{array}{l}\Delta N_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p={\beta }_0+{\beta }_1{N}_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}^p+{\beta }_2\mathit{\Delta S}{C}_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}+{\beta }_{3}m/f_S+\\ {\beta }_4{\mathit{\Delta G}}_S+{\beta }_5\mathit{\Delta S}{C}_{m/\mathit{\text{fGYS}}}\times \mathit{\text{female}}+{\beta }_6\mathit{\Delta Y}\end{array}\text{ (4)}$

In these models, $\Delta \mathrm{G}$ is the grade transition, i.e., Grade 6-to-Grade 7, Grade 7-to-Grade 8, Grade 8-to-Grade 9, Grade 9-to-Grade 10, Grade 10-to-Grade 11, and Grade 11-to-Grade 12.

In all models with the school year, we used the school year as a fixed effect to account for possible omitted variable bias due to year-to-year changes in levels of physical activity. We also clustered the standard errors at the school level to account for possible bias as a result of school system-level factors that may affect physical activity. R version 4.1.0 was used to conduct data analysis with the RStudio integrated development environment. A p-value of <0.05 was used as the criterion for significance reporting.

3 Results

We found the proportion of students who reported being physically active decreased from grade 6 to grade 7 and so on until grade 12 across all study years. The proportion of physically active male students was higher than the proportion of physically active female students in each grade; and the decrease in the proportion of physically active students in grade 6 vs. grade 12 was higher among females compared to males, i.e., the mean (yearly) decrease from grade 6th to grade 12th for females was 17.23%, and for males was 7.87% (Appendix Table C1). Figure 1 shows that the decrease among females was significantly more pronounced compared to male students across all years combined (Figure 1a) and each year separately (Figures 1b–f). The linear regression results (shown in Appendix Table D1) confirm the widening gender gap in physical activity as adolescents advance through the grades. The results show negative and significant coefficients in grades 10, 11, and 12 compared to grade 6 across all years. Results also show a significant negative coefficient for the interaction term and generally increase from lower to higher grades for females, suggesting a higher decrease among female students compared to male students.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Proportion of physically active students and 95% confidence interval (CI) by gender from grade 6 to 12 for all years combined and by year (a) 2016 to 2020 (b) 2016, (c) 2017, (d) 2018, (e) 2019, and (f) 2020.

We found a significant positive unadjusted association between the change in the perception of school climate measures and the change in the proportion of physically active students among all students and male and female students separately, except for cultural acceptance and peer victimization (Table 1). The results suggest that with an improved perception of school climate, there is an improvement in the proportion of physically active students. The coefficients were higher for peer social support for female students (7.744, p value<0.001), whereas it was school connectedness for male students (8.001, p value <0.001).

Table 1

Table 1. Unadjusted association of changes in the proportion of physically active students with changes in the perception of school climate measures for all students, female-only and male-only students.

The adjusted final model confirms that a change in the perception of school climate measures is significantly associated with a change in the proportion of physically active students. For example, a one-unit increase in change in the perception of school connectedness was significantly (p-value <0.001) associated with a 5.397 unit increase in a year-over-year increase in the proportion of physically active students. It means that there was nearly a one-to-five unit effect for change in the proportion of physically active students as the change in perception of school connectedness increased from grade to grade (Table 2). As shown in Table 2, the same directionality was observed for all school climate measures except cultural acceptance and peer victimization. However, the effect of the perception of school climate on physical activity did not differ significantly by gender (Appendix E1). Appendix Table E1 presents the full results summarized in Table 2.

Table 2

Table 2. Impact of year-to-year changes in school climate measure on year-to-year changes in the proportion of physically active students.

4 Discussion

We used 5 years (2016 to 2020) of state population-based self-reported data from middle and high school students in a state with established differences in physically active male and female students. The study objective was to identify the impact of changing perceptions of school climate on changing physical activity levels. We found a decrease in the proportion of physically active students as students advanced in grade, with a statistically significantly higher decline among female students compared to male students. Similarly, we found that the improved perception of school climate as students’ progress through the school system, i.e., moving to higher levels, improves physical activity, as evidenced by the significant positive association of grade-to-grade improved perception of school climate measures with grade-to-grade increases in the proportion of physically active students.

4.1 Trend in physical activity among middle and high school students

The study findings on the decreasing proportion of physically active students with a higher decline among females, are consistent with previous literature (51, 52). The results also suggest a significant drop in the proportion of physically active students during the transition from middle to high school, which could be due to the fact that in the US, physical activity instruction tends to be more regimented after students leave elementary and middle school (53), and the nature of physical education in higher grades could have accentuated such gender differences (54).

Looking closely, we observe that the boys increase their physical activity in middle school but then drop off as they transition to high school in 9th grade. It could be due to self-sorting by high school students into either a high-intensity physical activity (athletic teams) or only taking the more general physical education to meet the required one credit hour of physical education course requirement in the study state (55). Moreover, the single-credit physical education course can be taken online (56), thus disincentivizing physical activity. It is common among students to take physical education courses online during summer, further plummeting physical activity opportunities for students who are not participating in school sports teams. Girls show a more consistent downward trend without the distortion around school transition points showing an ongoing decline in physical activity during the pre-pubertal and pubertal phases. The finding raises concern for adolescents’ health as they transition to adulthood, and such a decrease in physical activity is associated with a higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and obesity (57–60) and is a threat to adolescent mental health (61–63). Interventions to prevent the decline in physical activity at school transition points appear essential to maintaining physical activity, particularly among female adolescents.

4.2 Impact of school climate on physical activity

Our finding builds on previous research, including cross-sectional studies and systematic reviews, indicating that the odds of being physically active increased with a positive perception of school climate that includes supportive school environments, school connectedness, peer social support, school physical environments, school safety, and adult social support (21, 64). School connectedness, school support environment, and peer social support were identified as the most important dimensions (effect size > 5), consistent with current literature that shows a strong association between physical activity and school connectedness (65–68), school support environment (64, 69), and peer social support (70–73). Such a phenomenon could be explained by the social development model, which proposes that individual students’ feeling of attachment and commitment (i.e., school connectedness) to the school environment due to support system available at the school promotes standards for positive behavior (such as involvement in exercise or sports) that are consistent with the standards and values of the school around physical activity (74–76). Additionally, as adolescents grow, they spend more time with their friends who share similar preferences toward physical activity, and the Youth Physical Activity Promotion (YPAP) model proposes that such peer social support acts as a reinforcing factor to motivate and ensure continued physical activity participation (77).

Likewise, our study and the current literature suggest that adult social support (71, 73, 78–80) and physical environment (64, 81, 82) are associated with physical activity among adolescents. Availability of school physical environment, such as proper school buildings, access to playgrounds and sports facilities, increases students’ access to resources and equipment. The YPAP model suggests that in a school environment that fosters a motivational environment to build students’ self-efficacy, the availability of such physical resources acts as an enabling factor to engage students in physical activity, further reinforced by the parental support at home and teachers/mentors in school settings (77). Similarly, our study and a 2023 analysis of the National Youth Risk Behavior Survey highlight how safety concerns at school could impact physical activity (83). Any experiences that threaten safety or perceived safety might discourage adolescents from engaging in outdoor physical activities such as walking or playing in parks (84). Such opportunities could be further limited by restrictions from parents due to safety concerns and/or poor physical environments (85, 86).

4.3 Implications of findings on public health

The current study and the extent of evidence highlight that investing in improving all components of school climate could help schools reduce the declining trend of physical activity in higher grades. These school climates are interrelated and call for attention to implement holistic interventions that aim to improve the overall school climate. Adolescents spend significant time in school, and the UN sustainable development goals must include schools as an avenue to provide the infrastructure and access to physical activity opportunities to promote their health and well-being.

Besides improved physical activity, improving school climate would have other positive consequences, such as improved academic performance (87–89). Studies have also found the mental health status of adolescents to be likely improved by better school climate, such as school safety, reduced peer victimization and bullying, and school support (90–92). Thus, schools need to pursue evidence-based strategies to improve their climate, such as the CDC’s six strategies to improve school connectedness (93) or published practical guidelines that provide step-by-step procedures to improve climate utilizing the high schools’ existing multitiered framework of outcomes, data, practices, and systems (94). Similarly, schools could focus on improving teacher-student relationships, student–student relationships, and rule clarity as studies have found improved perceptions of students’ relationships with teachers and other peers to reduce peer victimization and bullying and improve school safety (95–97). A longitudinal study among elementary school students found that the change in physical activity depends on school characteristics such as recess time, integrated physical activity programs, free and reduced lunch provision, and geographic location (98).

4.4 Strengths and limitations

This study has a few limitations. The survey responses were prone to bias and measurement errors due to the self-reported nature of the questions used to measure physical activity level and school climate perception among middle and high school students. Similarly, we were unable to differentiate between physical activity at home or school; the overall physical activity levels are still indicative of the general physical activity behaviors of the participants. Additionally, the highest level of response on physical activity measure was “4–5 days per week,” which is close to the recommended level but does not align perfectly with the WHO and CDC’s recommended level of physical activity. Thus, caution should be used while interpreting the results on physical activity as the study measures higher vs. lower physical activity levels instead of meeting the physical activity requirement vs. not. Potential confounding due to factors such as the demographic background of the students such as race/ethnicity, socio-economic background, and their parents’ characteristics were not directly controlled for, however, in the US school system the schools serve a neighborhood that has similar race/ethnicity, socio-economic background, and parents’ characteristics and our models cluster standard errors at the school level. The GDoE does not release data with both race/ethnicity and school name to ensure data anonymity, nor does it collect information on digital devices use among adolescents. Similarly, GSHS did not have information on availability and accessibility to resources (especially financially), the rural/urban location of the school, and neighborhood socio-economic status, which could impact the school’s ability to improve its school climate environment. Furthermore, the study was conducted at grade level, as the GSHS was an anonymous survey, and longitudinal follow-up of individual students was not feasible. However, the mandatory participation requirement for public schools allowed for longitudinal follow-up at the grade level for each school, and the homogeneity of the student body served by school districts in the US can safely be assumed (36, 37). Caution needs to be taken while interpreting the findings from this study as the results are drawn from group-level data with the assumption of similar distribution of student body over time, and missing potential confounding variables such as demographic characteristics and school-level contextual factors.

Despite these limitations, the study’s main strength is the longitudinal assessments of the impact of changed perceptions of school climate on changes in the proportion of physically active students from population-based data that requires a 75% participation rate from all middle and high schools of GA (99). Previous studies have either conducted longitudinal assessments with a single school climate measure only or are limited to cross-sectional studies, whereas we incorporate recent data to study all school climate measures. Future longitudinal studies at the individual level that accounts for students’ socio-demographic characteristics (such as social origin) and behavioral characteristics, along with school-level contextual factors (such as geographical location of schools, access to resources, and neighborhood characteristics) are needed to provide robust causal estimate on the impact of school climate on physical activity and assess the presence of any heterogeneous treatment effect by sex, race/ethnicity or school-level characteristics. Additionally, future studies should also strive to measure the physical activity level in detail, such as the level of energy expended, to assess the impact of school climate on different levels of physical activity.

5 Conclusion

The study showed a declining trend in the proportion of physically active students as they advanced in grade, particularly among females. Moreover, our study suggests that improvement in school climate will help increase physical activity among students as they progress to higher grades. This connection underscores the importance of fostering positive school climates to mitigate the decline in physical activity levels. Schools should implement evidence-based interventions to improve the school climate and promote physical activity in higher grades for overall adolescent health.

Data availability statement

The study utilized publicly available Georgia Student Health Survey 2.0 data, available to request at https://georgiainsights.gadoe.org/contact-request-data/. The data that supports the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

No ethics approval was sought for the present study as the study utilized data from an anonymous survey. There was no direct involvement of human subjects or access to private, sensitive information.

Author contributions

BT: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JM: Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MT: Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. LD: Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. KT: Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. YS: Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JI: Validation, Writing – review & editing. JR-T: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1582693/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CI, Confidence Interval; CVD, Cardiovascular Diseases; GA, Georgia; GDoE, Georgia Department of Education; GDPH, Georgia Department of Public Health; GSHS, Georgia Student Health Survey; MVPA, Moderate-to-Vigorous Intensity Physical Activity; PA, Physical Activity; US, United States; WHO, World Health Organization; YPAP, Youth Physical Activity Promotion.

References

1. WHO. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization (2018).

Google Scholar

2. WHO. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization (2020).

Google Scholar

3. Bielemann, RM, Martinez-Mesa, J, and Gigante, DP. Physical activity during life course and bone mass: a systematic review of methods and findings from cohort studies with young adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2013) 14:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-77

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chaput, JP, Willumsen, J, Bull, F, Chou, R, Ekelund, U, Firth, J, et al. 2020 who guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: summary of the evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2020) 17:141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. He, JP, Paksarian, D, and Merikangas, KR. Physical activity and mental disorder among adolescents in the United States. J Adolesc Health. (2018) 63:628–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.05.030

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Oliveira, RG, and Guedes, DP. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic syndrome in adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational evidence. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0168503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168503

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Guthold, R, Stevens, GA, Riley, LM, and Bull, FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2020) 4:23–35. doi: 10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30323-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Merlo, CL, Jones, SE, Michael, SL, Chen, TJ, Sliwa, SA, Lee, SH, et al. Dietary and physical activity behaviors among high school students-youth risk behavior survey, United States, 2019. MMWR Suppl. (2020) 69:64–76. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6901a8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Armstrong, S, Wong, CA, Perrin, E, Page, S, Sibley, L, and Skinner, A. Association of physical activity with income, race/ethnicity, and sex among adolescents and young adults in the United States: findings from the National Health and nutrition examination survey, 2007-2016. JAMA Pediatr. (2018) 172:732–40. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1273

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Telford, RM, Telford, RD, Olive, LS, Cochrane, T, and Davey, R. Why are girls less physically active than boys? Findings from the look longitudinal study. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0150041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Llorente-Cantarero, FJ, Aguilar-Gómez, FJ, Anguita-Ruiz, A, Rupérez, AI, Vázquez-Cobela, R, Flores-Rojas, K, et al. Changes in physical activity patterns from childhood to adolescence: Genobox longitudinal study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:7227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197227

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Goldfield, GS, Henderson, K, Buchholz, A, Obeid, N, Nguyen, H, and Flament, MF. Physical activity and psychological adjustment in adolescents. J Phys Act Health. (2011) 8:157–63. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.2.157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Liu, M, Zhang, J, Kamper-DeMarco, KE, Hu, E, and Yao, S. Associations of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity with psychological problems and suicidality in Chinese high school students: a cross-sectional study. PeerJ. (2020) 8:e 8775. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8775

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Fagan, MJ, Duncan, MJ, Bedi, RP, Puterman, E, Leatherdale, ST, and Faulkner, G. Physical activity and substance use among Canadian adolescents: examining the moderating role of school connectedness. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:889987. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.889987

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Fenesi, B, Graham, JD, Crichton, M, Ogrodnik, M, and Skinner, J. Physical activity in high school classrooms: a promising avenue for future research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020688

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Schunk, DH, and DiBenedetto, MK. Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemp Educ Psychol. (2020) 60:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Owen, M, Kerner, C, Newson, L, Noonan, R, Curry, W, Kosteli, M-C, et al. Investigating adolescent girls' perceptions and experiences of school-based physical activity to inform the girls' peer activity intervention study. J Sch Health. (2019) 89:730–8. doi: 10.1111/josh.12812

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Granero-Gallegos, A, Gómez-López, M, Rodríguez-Suárez, N, Abraldes, JA, Alesi, M, and Bianco, A. Importance of the motivational climate in goal, enjoyment, and the causes of success in handball players. Front Psychol. (2017) 8:2081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02081

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wu, X, Gai, X, Yu, T, Yu, H, and Zhang, Y. Perceived motivational climate and stages of exercise behavior change: mediating roles of motivation within and beyond physical education class. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:737461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737461

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. van Sluijs, EMF, Ekelund, U, Crochemore-Silva, I, Guthold, R, Ha, A, Lubans, D, et al. Physical activity Behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention. Lancet. (2021) 398:429–42. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01259-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Rajbhandari-Thapa, J, Metzger, I, Ingels, J, Thapa, K, and Chiang, K. School climate-related determinants of physical activity among high school girls and boys. J Adolesc. (2022) 94:642–55. doi: 10.1002/jad.12052

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Barbosa, A, Whiting, S, Simmonds, P, Scotini Moreno, R, Mendes, R, and Breda, J. Physical activity and academic achievement: an umbrella review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:5972. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165972

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Berkowitz, R. School matters: the contribution of positive school climate to equal educational opportunities among ethnocultural minority students. Youth Soc. (2020) 54:372–96. doi: 10.1177/0044118X20970235

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Fritz, J, Cöster, ME, Rosengren, BE, Karlsson, C, and Karlsson, MK. Daily school physical activity improves academic performance. Sports (Basel). (2020) 8:83. doi: 10.3390/sports8060083

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Gall, S, Adams, L, Joubert, N, Ludyga, S, Müller, I, Nqweniso, S, et al. Effect of a 20-week physical activity intervention on selective attention and academic performance in children living in disadvantaged neighborhoods: a cluster randomized control trial. PLoS One. (2018) 13:e0206908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206908

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. García-Hermoso, A, Hormazábal-Aguayo, I, Fernández-Vergara, O, González-Calderón, N, Russell-Guzmán, J, Vicencio-Rojas, F, et al. A before-school physical activity intervention to improve cognitive parameters in children: the active-start study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2020) 30:108–16. doi: 10.1111/sms.13537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Graham, DJ, Lucas-Thompson, RG, and O’Donnell, MB. Jump in! An investigation of school physical activity climate, and a pilot study assessing the acceptability and feasibility of a novel tool to increase activity during learning. Front Public Health. (2014) 2:58. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00058

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Delgado-Floody, P, Cristi-Montero, C, Jerez-Mayorga, D, Ruiz-Ariza, A, Guzmán-Guzmán, IP, Álvarez, C, et al. Exploring the mediating role of promoting school physical activity on the relationship between low socioeconomic status and academic achievement and school climate: evidence from 4, 990 Chilean schools. Front Public Health. (2024) 12:1426108. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1426108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ferreira Silva, RM, Mendonça, CR, Azevedo, VD, Raoof Memon, A, Noll, PRES, and Noll, M. Barriers to high school and university students’ physical activity: a systematic review. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0265913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265913

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Hu, D, Zhou, S, Crowley-McHattan, ZJ, and Liu, Z. Factors that influence participation in physical activity in school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic review from the social ecological model perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:3147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063147

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. CDC. Physical activity for different groups (2021). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/age-chart.html (Accessed on 10/10/2022)

Google Scholar

32. Loux, T, Matusik, M, and Hamzic, A. Trends in U.S. adolescent physical activity and obesity: a 20-year age-period-cohort analysis. Pediatr Obes. (2023) 18:e12996. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12996

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hodges, J, and Benefield, C. Georgia Student Health Survey (Gshs). (2025). Available online at: https://dcconference.gadoe.org/Documents/FY2020/SEA/Georgia%20Student%20Health%20Survey.pdf (Accessed on 2025 May 26)

Google Scholar

34. GDoE. Using the Georgia Student Health Survey to Understand Student Trends: Office of Whole CHild Supports, Georgia Department of Education (2021). Available online at: https://www.gadoe.org/wholechild/GSHS-II/Documents/GSHS%20and%20Wellness%20Survey%20Overview_9.14.2021.pdf?csf=1&e=syN4cj (Accessed on 2023 February 27)

Google Scholar

35. Ingels, JB, Thapa, K, Shrestha, S, and Rajbhandari-Thapa, J. Cigarette and electronic vapor product use among high school students in Georgia, 2015-2018. Prev Med Rep. (2020) 19:101140. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101140

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Owens, A, and Rich, P. Little boxes all the same? Racial-ethnic segregation and educational inequality across the urban-suburban divide. RSF Russell Sage Found J Soc Sci. (2023) 9:26–54. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2023.9.2.02

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. United States Government Accountability Office. K12 education student population has significantly diversified, but many schools remain divided along racial, ethnic, and economic lines. US: United States Government Accountability Office (2022).

Google Scholar

38. Georgia Secretary of State. Release 82 of the Official Code of Georgia, Title 20 Education: 20-2-291. (2021). Available online at: https://unicourt.github.io/cic-code-ga/transforms/ga/ocga/r82/gov.ga.ocga.title.20.html#t20c02a06p13s20-2-291 (Accessed December 12, 2023).

Google Scholar

39. Education Week. Map: coronavirus and school closures (2020, march 6) (2020). Available online at: https://www.edweek.org/leadership/map-coronavirus-and-school-closures-in-2019-2020/2020/03 (Accessed on 2023 December 17)

Google Scholar

40. Greer, J, Thapa, K, McNulty, J, and Thapa, JR. Parental school involvement on physical activity and screen time among middle and high school students. J Ga Public Health Assoc. (2021) 8:3. doi: 10.20429/jgpha.2021.080303

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Seidu, A-A, Ahinkorah, BO, Agbaglo, E, Darteh, EKM, Ameyaw, EK, Budu, E, et al. Are senior high school students in Ghana meeting who’s recommended level of physical activity? Evidence from the 2012 global school-based student health survey data. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0229012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Collins, TA, LST, P, Jesslynn, RN, FJ, A, and Scott, MN. No safe space: school climate experiences of black boys with and without emotional and behavioral disorders. Sch Psychol Rev. (2023) 52:250–63. doi: 10.1080/2372966X.2021.2021783

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Kittelman, A, La Salle, TP, Mercer, SH, and McIntosh, K. Identifying profiles of school climate in high schools. Sch Psychol Forum. (2024) 39:50–60. doi: 10.1037/spq0000553

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. La Salle, TP, Wang, C, Parris, L, and Brown, JA. Associations between school climate, suicidal thoughts, and behaviors and ethnicity among middle school students. Psychol Sch. (2017) 54:1294–301. doi: 10.1002/pits.22078

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Parris, L, Neves, JR, and La Salle, T. School climate perceptions of ethnically diverse students: does school diversity matter? Sch Psychol Int. (2018) 39:625–45. doi: 10.1177/0143034318798419

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Salle, TL, George, HP, McCoach, DB, Polk, T, and Evanovich, LL. An examination of school climate, victimization, and mental health problems among middle school students self-identifying with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behav Disord. (2018) 43:383–92. doi: 10.1177/0198742918768045

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Wang, C, Salle, T, Wu, C, Do, K, and Sullivan, K. School climate and parental involvement buffer the risk of peer victimization on suicidal thoughts and behaviors among Asian American middle school students. Asian Am J Psychol. (2018) 9:296–307. doi: 10.1037/aap0000138

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. La Salle, TP, McCoach, DB, and Meyers, J. Examining measurement invariance and perceptions of school climate across gender and race and ethnicity. J Psychoeduc Assess. (2021) 39:800–15. doi: 10.1177/07342829211023717

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. La Salle, TP, and Meyers, J. The Georgia Student Health Survey 2.0. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Department of Education (2014).

Google Scholar

50. Allison, PD. Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociol Methodol. (1990) 20:93–114. doi: 10.2307/271083

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kann, L, McManus, T, Harris, WA, Shanklin, SL, Flint, KH, Queen, B, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. (2018) 67:1–114. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Lee, BY, Adam, A, Zenkov, E, Hertenstein, D, Ferguson, MC, Wang, PI, et al. Modeling the economic and health impact of increasing children’s physical activity in the United States. Health Aff. (2017) 36:902–8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1315

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Corbin, CB. Conceptual physical education: a course for the future. J Sport Health Sci. (2021) 10:308–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.10.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Guerrero, MA, and Guerrero Puerta, L. Advancing gender equality in schools through inclusive physical education and teaching training: a systematic review. Sociol Sci. (2023) 13:64. doi: 10.3390/soc13030064

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. GDoE. Rule 160–4-2-.48: high school graduation requirements for students enrolling in the ninth grade for the first time in the 2008–09 school year and subsequent years (2020). Available online at: https://rules.sos.ga.gov/gac/160-4-2-.48 (Accessed on 2024 January 12)

Google Scholar

56. GDoE. (2010). Georgia high school graduation requirements: preparing students for success. Available online at: https://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/Curriculum-and-Instruction/Documents/Grad%20Guidance%20Doc%20REVISED%20-%20January%2006,%202010.pdf (Accessed on 2024 January 12)

Google Scholar

57. Ashcraft, KA, Peace, RM, Betof, AS, Dewhirst, MW, and Jones, LW. Efficacy and mechanisms of aerobic exercise on Cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis: a critical systematic review of in vivo preclinical data. Cancer Res. (2016) 76:4032–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-16-0887

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Herting, MM, and Chu, X. Exercise, cognition, and the adolescent brain. Birth Defects Res. (2017) 109:1672–9. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1178

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Janssen, I, and Leblanc, AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2010) 7:40. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-40

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Stanford, KI, and Goodyear, LJ. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: molecular mechanisms regulating glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. Adv Physiol Educ. (2014) 38:308–14. doi: 10.1152/advan.00080.2014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Andermo, S, Hallgren, M, Nguyen, T-T-D, Jonsson, S, Petersen, S, Friberg, M, et al. School-related physical activity interventions and mental health among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med-Open. (2020) 6:25. doi: 10.1186/s40798-020-00254-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Chi, X, Liang, K, Chen, ST, Huang, Q, Huang, L, Yu, Q, et al. Mental health problems among Chinese adolescents during the Covid-19: the importance of nutrition and physical activity. Int J Clin Health Psychol. (2021) 21:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.100218

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Marconcin, P, Werneck, AO, Peralta, M, Ihle, A, Gouveia, ÉR, Ferrari, G, et al. The association between physical activity and mental health during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. (2022) 22:209. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12590-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Morton, KL, Atkin, AJ, Corder, K, Suhrcke, M, and van Sluijs, EMF. The school environment and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a mixed-studies systematic review. Obes Rev. (2016) 17:142–58. doi: 10.1111/obr.12352

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Faulkner, GEJ, Adlaf, EM, Irving, HM, Allison, KR, and Dwyer, J. School disconnectedness: identifying adolescents at risk in Ontario, Canada. J Sch Health. (2009) 79:312–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00415.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Michael, SL, Li, J, Sliwa, S, Cornett, K, and Hertz, M. Association between adolescent self-reported physical activity behaviors and feeling close to people at school during the Covid-19 pandemic. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2024) 18:364–75. doi: 10.1177/15598276231157324

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Trinh, L, Wong, B, and Faulkner, GE. The independent and interactive associations of screen time and physical activity on mental health, school connectedness and academic achievement among a population-based sample of youth. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2015) 24:17–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00176.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Weatherson, KA, O'Neill, M, Lau, EY, Qian, W, Leatherdale, ST, and Faulkner, GEJ. The protective effects of school connectedness on substance use and physical activity. J Adolesc Health. (2018) 63:724–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.07.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Chen, R, Wang, L, Wang, B, and Zhou, Y. Motivational climate, need satisfaction, self-determined motivation, and physical activity of students in secondary school physical education in China. BMC Public Health. (2020) 20:1687. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09750-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Chen, H, Sun, H, and Dai, J. Peer support and adolescents’ physical activity: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and enjoyment. J Pediatr Psychol. (2017) 42:569–77. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Haidar, A, Ranjit, N, Archer, N, and Hoelscher, DM. Parental and peer social support is associated with healthier physical activity behaviors in adolescents: a cross-sectional analysis of Texas school physical activity and nutrition (Tx span) data. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:640. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7001-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Mendonça, G, and Farias Júnior, JC. Physical activity and social support in adolescents: analysis of different types and sources of social support. J Sports Sci. (2015) 33:1942–51. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1020842

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Mendonça, G, Cheng, LA, Mélo, EN, and de Farias Júnior, JC. Physical activity and social support in adolescents: a systematic review. Health Educ Res. (2014) 29:822–39. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Catalano, RF, Oesterle, S, Fleming, CB, and Hawkins, JD. The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: findings from the social development research group. J Sch Health. (2004) 74:252–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08281.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Chapman, RL, Buckley, L, Sheehan, M, and Shochet, I. School-based programs for increasing connectedness and reducing risk behavior: a systematic review. Educ Psychol Rev. (2013) 25:95–114. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9216-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Hawkins, JD, Catalano, RF, Kosterman, R, Abbott, R, and Hill, KG. Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. (1999) 153:226–34. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.3.226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Welk, GJ. The youth physical activity promotion model: a conceptual bridge between theory and practice. Quest. (1999) 51:5–23. doi: 10.1080/00336297.1999.10484297

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Eather, N, Morgan, PJ, and Lubans, DR. Social support from teachers mediates physical activity behavior change in children participating in the Fit-4-fun intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2013) 10:68. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-68

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Pluta, B, Korcz, A, Krzysztoszek, J, Bronikowski, M, and Bronikowska, M. Associations between adolescents’ physical activity behavior and their perceptions of parental, peer and teacher support. Arch Public Health. (2020) 78:106. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00490-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Shen, B, Li, W, Sun, H, and Rukavina, PB. The influence of inadequate teacher-to-student social support on amotivation of physical education students. J Teach Phys Educ. (2010) 29:417–32. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.29.4.417

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Hawkins, GT, Chung, CS, Hertz, MF, and Antolin, N. The school environment and physical and social-emotional well-being: implications for students and school employees. J Sch Health. (2023) 93:799–812. doi: 10.1111/josh.13375

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Crooks, N, Alston, L, Nichols, M, Bolton, KA, Allender, S, Fraser, P, et al. Association between the school physical activity environment, measured and self-reported student physical activity and active transport Behaviours in Victoria, Australia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2021) 18:79. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01151-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Cornett, K, Michael, S, Sliwa, S, Chen, T, Kissler, C, McKinnon, I, et al. Physical activity behaviors and negative safety and violence experiences among high school students-youth risk behavior survey, United States, 2023. MMWR Suppl. (2024) 73:94–103. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su7304a11

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Constable Fernandez, C, Patalay, P, Vaughan, L, Church, D, Hamer, M, and Maddock, J. Subjective and objective indicators of Neighbourhood safety and physical activity among Uk adolescents. Health Place. (2023) 83:103050. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Ries, AV, Gittelsohn, J, Voorhees, CC, Roche, KM, Clifton, KJ, and Astone, NM. The environment and urban adolescents' use of recreational facilities for physical activity: a qualitative study. Am J Health Promot. (2008) 23:43–50. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.07043042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Zhu, M, Teng, R, Wang, C, Wang, Y, He, J, and Yu, F. Key environmental factors affecting perceptions of security of night-time walking in neighbourhood streets: a discussion based on fear heat maps. J Transp Health. (2023) 32:101636. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2023.101636

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Berkowitz, R, Moore, H, Astor, RA, and Benbenishty, R. A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Rev Educ Res. (2016) 87:425–69. doi: 10.3102/d0034654316669821

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Cuellar, MJ, Coyle, S, and Weinreb, KS. Dealing with the day-to-day: harnessing school climate to address the effects of student victimization on academic performance. Psychol Sch. (2021) 58:1799–815. doi: 10.1002/pits.22560

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Wang, W, Vaillancourt, T, Brittain, HL, McDougall, P, Krygsman, A, Smith, D, et al. School climate, peer victimization, and academic achievement: results from a multi-informant study. Sch Psychol Q. (2014) 29:360–77. doi: 10.1037/spq0000084

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Franco, K, Baumler, E, Torres, ED, Lu, Y, Wood, L, and Temple, JR. The link between school climate and mental health among an ethnically diverse sample of middle school youth. Curr Psychol. (2023) 42:18488–98. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03016-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Leurent, B, Dodd, M, Allen, E, Viner, R, Scott, S, and Bonell, C. Is positive school climate associated with better adolescent mental health? Longitudinal study of young people in England. SSM Ment Health. (2021) 1:33. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Lombardi, E, Traficante, D, Bettoni, R, Offredi, I, Giorgetti, M, and Vernice, M. The impact of school climate on well-being experience and school engagement: a study with high-school students. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02482

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. CDC. School connectedness; strategies for increasing protective factors among youth. Centers for Disease C, Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease P, Health Promotion DoA, School H. US: Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2009).

Google Scholar

94. Van Lone, J, Freeman, J, LaSalle, T, Gordon, L, Polk, T, and Rocha Neves, J. A practical guide to improving school climate in high schools. Interv Sch Clin. (2019) 55:39–45. doi: 10.1177/1053451219832988

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Aldridge, JM, McChesney, K, and Afari, E. Associations between school climate and student life satisfaction: resilience and bullying as mediating factors. Learn Environ Res. (2020) 23:129–50. doi: 10.1007/s10984-019-09296-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Ferrer- Cascales, R, Albaladejo- Blázquez, N, Sánchez- San Segundo, M, Portilla- Tamarit, I, Lordan, O, and Ruiz- Robledillo, N. Effectiveness of the TEI program for bullying and cyberbullying reduction and school climate improvement. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040580

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Lewno-Dumdie, BM, Mason, BA, Hajovsky, DB, and Villeneuve, EF. Student-report measures of school climate: a dimensional review. Sch Ment Heal. (2020) 12:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s12310-019-09340-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Rajbhandari-Thapa, J, Ingels, J, Thapa, K, Davis, M, and Corso, P. Longitudinal evaluation of the impact of school characteristics on changes in physical activity opportunities. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0228716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228716

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. GDoE. (2019). School climate star ratings data calculation guide for principals and district users (2019). Available online at: https://www.gadoe.org/wholechild/Documents/2019%20School%20Climate%20Star%20Rating%20Calculation%20Guide_October%202019.pdf (Accessed on 2024 January 12)

Google Scholar