REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 12 August 2021

Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services

Volume 5 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.688641

Red Chittagong Cattle: An Indigenous Breed to Help Tackle the Challenges of Modern Animal Production Systems

  • 1. Animal Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • 2. Livestock Production and Welfare Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Article metrics

View details

2

Citations

11,8k

Views

982

Downloads

Abstract

Modern livestock selection is rapidly condensing the indigenous cattle gene pool. This trend limits the options for future genetic selection to benefit both animal well-being and farmer challenges. Here we reveal the potential of Red Chittagong cattle (RCC), a native genotype of Bangladesh, for tackling these current and pending challenges. Red Chittagong cattle are reddish in color and small in size with mature bulls and cows weighing 342 and 180 kg from birth weights of 16 and 14 kg, respectively. Whilst low mean levels of milk production of 618 L across a 228-day lactation are recorded so are high levels of milk protein (3.8%) and fat (4.8%) with offered feed types typically low in nutritive value, particularly crude protein. However, one in five cows under farm condition yield >1,000 L/lactation. Alongside high levels of milk protein and fat, other key features of this breed include resistance to common diseases and parasites with a high level of adaptation to agro-ecological conditions. As opposed to other indigenous breeds, there is currently high genetic variation in the RCC population, and associated variation in productive and reproductive traits highlighting the opportunity for development through long-term breeding programs alongside improved management conditions. Such efforts would enable this breed to become a global resource for tackling the challenges of modern animal production systems. In addition, further work is required to reveal the demographic distribution of the breed, potential production levels through the provision of improved diets and the mechanisms enabling disease resistance and digestibility of feeds.

Introduction

The transition of agriculture from the Neolithic age to the intensive commercial systems of today helps ensure food security and better standards of living for the growing global population (Silbergeld, 2019). In many commercial animal production systems around the world, high producing animals of similar genotypes are typically reared in confined housing systems with mechanically processed feedstuff. Recently, farms in Bangladesh have introduced Holstein genetics into more intensive systems from Australia and the Netherlands. Such high producing animal genotypes are reared to achieve high productivity and profitability, largely omitting native animal genotypes which threatens their survival as a breed. Moreover, such intensification may increase the risk of disease transmission both between animals, and animal-to-human, alongside antibiotic resistance (Leibler et al., 2017; Aidara-Kane et al., 2018). Therefore, long term sustainability of intensive livestock production using commercial breeds, which mostly developed in the temperate countries, is questionable especially under tropical climatic condition. In contrast, native livestock resources in tropical countries evolved through natural selection based on the phenotype characteristics and organoleptic evaluation (tastes of products) preferred by the native consumers whilst these local breeds are typically adapted to prevailing hot and humid climates, locally available feeds, are resistant to parasitic and diseases, and have a greater survival rate, giving birth to a calf every year (i.e., more fertile). For example, Khan et al. (2012) reported the profitability of rearing crossbred dairy cows in Bangladesh (Holstein × Indigenous cattle) was less than native Red Chittagong Cattle (RCC) on a lifetime productive performance basis. Also, indigenous cattle genetic resources are usually resistant to some parasites, disease infections and environmental stress in their natural habitats (Nyamushamba et al., 2017). Therefore, maintaining an improved balance between intensification of commercial genotypes (mainly Holstein and their crossbreds/hybrids that are frequently reared in commercial farms) and the extension of high producing local genotypes may help ensure food and nutrition security and improve health of local communities by keeping antibiotic resistance of animals and reducing community disease transmission into the future. In this context, this review will focus on the native Red Chittagong cattle (RCC) breed of Bangladesh—a breed developed under highly challenging environmental conditions.

The name “Red Chittagong” cattle is derived from the breed's reddish coat color (Huque et al., 2010; Bhuiyan, 2013; Sultana, 2018) and the name of its natural breeding habitat—Chittagong, Bangladesh. Red Chittagong cattle are regarded as an improved native cattle species in Bangladesh (Mason and Buvanendran, 1982; Mason, 1988). Other improved native cattle genotypes found in Bangladesh are Pabna cattle at Pabna region, North Bengal Gray at Northern region, and Munshigonj and Madaripur cattle of Central Bangladesh (BLRI, 2004; Bhuiyan et al., 2005; Hossain, 2005; Bhuiyan, 2013; Sultana, 2018). Red Chittagong cattle are a dual-purpose breed for dairy and beef production and play a key role in poverty alleviation for small holder farmers in its habitat (BLRI, 2004). The breed also has a short post-partum heat period, high conception rates, greater milk fat content (Halim et al., 2010; Bhuiyan, 2013) and high calving rate (Khan et al., 2012). In addition, the breed is more resistant to parasites and diseases prevailing in its habitats than other cattle (Ahmed et al., 2015; Chowdhury et al., 2017) with high survivability in both adults and calves (Quaderi et al., 2013). A life-time economic evaluation of different dairy cattle breeds conducted in the rural areas of Chittagong reported greater profitability of rearing RCC compared to other cattle genotypes (Khan et al., 2012). Considering these attributes, RCC may be regarded as a potential cattle genotype to tackle the future challenges of intensive animal production in Bangladesh. Therefore, the objectives of this review were to synthesize existing research knowledge of the RCC breed and reveal the potential of this breed to tackle the challenges of our modern animal production systems whilst highlighting the opportunities for future research. A review of Red Chittagong cattle distribution, genotype and the interaction of this genotype with the environment (phenotype) are provided here.

The Distribution of Red Chittagong Cattle

The main habitat of RCC is in Chittagong. A survey conducted a decade ago (2008) in Chittagong found only 9% cattle were RCC ranging from 2% in the Rangunia region to 35% in Chandanaish (Table 1 and Figure 1) (Huque et al., 2010). Anecdotally, the number of RCC was decreasing due to indiscriminate crossbreeding with Holstein and other native cattle, presumably because of a common conception that crossbreds of native cattle with high-yielding breeds will produce more meat and milk, ignoring potentiality of lifetime productivity and profitability from RCC. Given these dwindling numbers, the Bangladesh Government took the initiative to protect this RCC in its habitat and develop the breed to help ensure its survival (RCC breed Improvement and Conservation Project, implemented by Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute during 2007–2012).

Table 1

RegionsTCNRCC (%)RCC (heads, calculated)
Anowara24,6249.872,430
Chandanaish28,34835.4210,040
Raozan40,57819.988,106
Potiya30,5868.832,699
Boalkhali10,41814.511,512
Satkania47,0828.774,131
Lohagora38,3746.322,427
Banshkhali49,6255.262,610
Rangunia48,7621.57768
Hathazari26,44713.483,564
Fatikchhari85,1601.841,570
Sitakunda29,6165.521,634
Total459,620-41,730

Number of Red Chittagong cattle at Chittagong, Bangladesh (2008).

TCN, total cattle number in 2008 (BBS, 2011); RCC (%), Red Chittagong cattle (Huque et al., 2010); RCC (heads), calculates as .

Figure 1

Figure 1

Geographical distribution of Red Chittagong cattle at Chittagong in 2008 [adapted from Huque et al. (2010)].

The impact of this government intervention is evident as per a recent survey (BSR, 2018) taken from six administrative regions of Chittagong (Anowara, Banskhali, Chandanaish, Hathazari, Patiya, and Satkania) that showed 15% of the total cattle population to be RCC. More importantly, this survey showed RCC was spreading throughout the country in the districts neighboring Chittagong such as Feni, Noakhali, Comilla, Rangamati, Bandarban, Khagrachori to as north as Mymensingh and Kurigram (Huque et al., 2010; Hamid et al., 2017; BSR, 2018). BSR (2018) in a recent survey reported 58% of cattle in Mymensingh sadar, 7% in Kurigram (Rajarhat) and 4% cattle in Bandarban (Naikhongchari) were RCC. Thus, a detailed survey is required to document RCC number and distribution across the country, including its impact on farmers to further steps to protect RCC and improve the breed through the genetic selection process.

Genotype

The origin of the RCC breed is closely linked to Indian zebu cattle genotypes (Bos indicus sub species). Bhuiyan et al. (2007a) reported that the mitochondrial DNA diversity between RCC and some zebu cattle (Ongole, Sahiwal, Hariana) was lower than the diversity between RCC and some taurine breeds (Friesian and Simmental). The minimum mitochondrial-DNA nucleotide sequence divergence value between RCC and Indian zebu cattle (Sahiwal, Hariana, and Ongole cattle; 0.011, 0.012, and 0.013, respectively) compared to some taurine cattle (Friesian, Hanwoo, and Simmental; 0.054, 0.055, and 0.056, respectively) indicates a close genetic relationship between RCC and Indian zebu cattle (Bhuiyan et al., 2007a), particularly between RCC and Sahiwal. When mitochondrial-DNA nucleotide sequence divergence value was viewed across time between RCC vs. Sahiwal, Hariana, and Ongole cattle, the estimated divergence time were ~22,700, 24,800, and 26,900 years before present (Bhuiyan et al., 2007a), suggesting their concurrent emergence long before the time of animal domestication (about 10,000 years). The Y-chromosome specific marker test (INRA-124) also showed no introgression of taurine blood in the RCC male (Bhuiyan et al., 2007a).

Whilst natural selection played a key role in the evolution of RCC, human activity also contributed to shaping the breed such as reddish coat color and strong and stout physical conformation suitable for draft and transport (Bhuiyan et al., 2008; Bag et al., 2010). These characteristics were also in line with the needs of rural farmers and their religious and social rituals, as a mature healthy bull with attractive red color is important for sacrifice during different religious events (such as, Eid al-Adha).

Bhuiyan et al. (2007a) reported a high genetic variation of this breed within the population using mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis. It also possesses moderate heritability of its productive traits, ranging from 0.38 to 0.49 (Table 2; Alam et al., 2007; Rabeya et al., 2009; Afroz et al., 2011, 2012; Rahman et al., 2016; Ferdous et al., 2019). The moderate heritability of traits imply that additive gene action may play a role in regulating them, and their improvement may be possible by improved management and selection practices. Bhuiyan et al. (2007b) also reported selective breeding programs as a key tool for the development of RCC.

Table 2

Productive traitsHeritabilitySDNMinimumMaximumTotal cattle observation
Birth weight0.470.0240.450.49419
Weaning weight0.480.0130.470.49401
Lactation length0.440.0530.390.47330
Lactation milk yield0.380.0940.270.47380
Pre-weaning gain0.470.0440.410.50528
Post-weaning gain0.490.0020.490.49288

Heritability estimates of some productive traits of Red Chittagong cattle.

SD, standard deviation; N, number of articles that reported the parameters. From Afroz et al. (2011), Afroz et al. (2012), Alam et al. (2007), Ferdous et al. (2019), Rabeya et al. (2009), and Rahman et al. (2016).

Phenotype

The phenotypic traits of RCC shown (Figure 2) are taken from Bag et al. (2010) and Bhuiyan et al. (2008) and are presented in Table 3. The measurements of mature male and female Red Chittagong cattle body parts are provided in Table 4 and were taken from Bag et al. (2010) and Habib et al. (2003). The RCC is a readily distinguishable reddish indigenous cattle genotype with greater average body length, height at wither and heart girth (111–132, 107–125, and 123–147 cm, respectively; Table 5) than non-descriptive indigenous and North Bengal gray cattle (106, 100, and 129 and 100–105, 93–94, and 122–127 cm, respectively; Hamid et al., 2017), but much lower than Pabna cattle (164, 118, and 148 cm, respectively; Hamid et al., 2017). Therefore, RCC may be regarded as a medium-size breed amongst native Bangladeshi genotype, but a small genotype compared to crossbreds or temperate breeds.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Red Chittagong cattle of Bangladesh.

Table 3

Body partColor%Other descriptions
Body--The body is blocky. Male is heavier than female.
Physical condition--They are strong and stout in physical condition.
Head--Head is narrow and thin with flat forehead.
Hump--Hump is well-developed and vertically erected. It is more prominent in male than female.
LegsLegs are medium, firmly set under the body and well-apart from one another.
Ears--Ears are medium in size, alert and slightly dropping.
Coat colorReddish78The hair coat is fine, short, strong and smooth with remarkable shine.
Reddish-yellow13
Reddish-white9
HornsReddish-black94Horns are medium and stumpy, tapering to a blunt point.
Whitish6
MuzzleReddish65-
Whitish-red35
HoofReddish78-
Pale red12
Eye ballReddish98-
Blackish-red2
Eye browReddish100-
VulvaReddish100-
SwitchReddish100-

Physical appearance of Red Chittagong cattle.

From Bag et al. (2010) and Bhuiyan et al. (2008).

Table 4

Parameters (cm)MaleFemaleTotal cattle observation
AverageSDNMinMaxAverageSDNMinMax
Length (shoulder to pin bone)132321301341115210711470
Wither height125121241251071210610870
Heart girth14713213715612325210514070
Horn length121--11-1--50
Horn diameter121--9-1--50
Teat length-----5-1--50
Teat diameter-----6-1--50
Distance between fore teats-----7-1--50
Distance between rear teats-----6-1--50
Regardless of sex
Ear length161-----50
Ear width121-----50
Tail with switch921-----50

Physical measurements of mature Red Chittagong cattle.

SD, standard deviation; N, number of articles that reported the parameters; Min, minimum; Max, maximum.

From Bag et al. (2010) and Habib et al. (2003).

Table 5

ParametersAverageSDNMinimumMaximumTotal cattle observation
Birth weight of male calf, kg160.961416659
Birth weight of female calf, kg140.861215659
Weaning age, months81479293
Weaning weight, kg535.384865420
Mature weight of male animal, kg342704268436147
Mature weight of female animal, kg180144160191721
Age at puberty of male calf, months25-1--27
Age at puberty of female calf, months294191533163
Gestation period, days2833232792871,742
Age at first calving, months413113445754
Post-partum estrous, days963321401411,163
Calving interval, months1412612151,978
Conception rate of cows, %78-1--95
Service per conception1.50.2311.21.81,757
Calf survivability, %942493971,348

Productive and reproductive traits of Red Chittagong cattle.

SD, standard deviation; N, number of articles that reported the parameters. From Afroz et al. (2011), Alam et al. (2007), Amin et al. (2013), Asaduzzaman et al. (2017a), Asaduzzaman et al. (2017b), Asaduzzaman et al. (2019), Azizunnesa et al. (2010), Bag et al. (2010), Bhuiyan et al. (2008), Das et al. (2018), Habib et al. (2003), Habib et al. (2008), Habib et al. (2009), Habib et al. (2010b), Hamid et al. (2017), Hasanuzzaman et al. (2012), Hossain et al. (2018), Huque et al. (2010), Kamal (2010), Karim et al. (2019), Khan et al. (2000), Khan et al. (2010), Khan et al. (2012), Mostari et al. (2007), Nahar et al. (2016), Nath et al. (2016), Rabeya et al. (2009), Rahman et al. (2016), and Sarker et al. (2015).

Genotype Environment Interaction

Production and Reproduction

The productive and reproductive characteristics of the RCC breed are provided in Table 5. Overall, the birth weight of the RCC calf was between 14 and 16 kg (Table 5) similar to non-descriptive indigenous, but lower than Pabna, and North Bengal gray cattle (15, 21, and 18 kg, respectively; Bhuiyan, 2013). RCC heifers reached puberty 5, 9, and 7 months earlier than Munshiganj, Pabna, and Sahiwal cattle genotype in Bangladesh (34, 38, and 36 months, respectively; Bhuiyan, 2013). The gestation period of RCC (283 ± 3 days) was similar to other cattle genotypes in Bangladesh and the post-partum estrus of the RCC cow (96 ± 33 days) was lower than Sahiwal and Sindhi crossbreeds (105 and 127 days, respectively; Islam et al., 2014a). The mature live weight of RCC (180–342 kg) was greater than indigenous cattle (120–180 kg; BLRI, 2004), but lower than crossbreds (300–550 kg; BLRI, 2004).

The calving interval of RCC at 14 months (14 months; Table 5) was similar to non-descriptive indigenous cattle, North Bengal gray, and Pabna cattle (15, 15, and 14 months, respectively; Bhuiyan, 2013). The service per conception (1.5; Table 5) was greater than non-descriptive indigenous, Pabna cattle, North Bengal gray, and Munshiganj cattle of Bangladesh (1.4, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.3, respectively; Bhuiyan, 2013) and calf survivability was 94% which was similar to non-descriptive indigenous, but higher than crossbreds at farm level (83%; Khan et al., 2012). The RCC cow reached puberty at 29 months, gave birth every 14 months and returned to heat by 96 days post-partum, better than other indigenous and crossbred cattle in Bangladesh.

The quantity and quality of RCC milk is presented in Table 6. On average, the RCC cow produced 618 L of milk across a 228-day lactation period, with a daily milk yield of 2.7 L/day, which contained high fat and protein content. The greatest RCC milk production herd was from the Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI) recorded to be 838 L from a 219-day lactation (4 L/day; Khan and Mostari, 2015). In the BLRI herd, 18% of the cows produce more than 1,000 L of milk in a lactation, with the greatest recorded production from a single cow being 1,436 L in one lactation (Khan and Mostari, 2015). This high phenotypic variation in milk production per lactation (618–1,436 L) suggests that there is a great prospect for the development of RCC through selective breeding. Production of 1,436 L milk per lactation is substantial from a mature RCC cow of 180 kg live weight (Table 5), and it would be equivalent to ~6,000 L/lactation from a modern Holstein Friesian of 700 kg mature live weight. This suggests that the feed conversion ratio of RCC could be similar to Holstein Friesian cows but there is no comparative study available on this issue. A 2-year comparative study at farm level reported greater lactation length and milk yield of RCC (265 days and 597 L, respectively) than non-descriptive indigenous varieties (258 days and 497 L, respectively), but lower than crossbreds (285 days and 1,272 L, respectively) (Khan et al., 2012). However, rearing RCC was reported to be more profitable than Holstein x local crossbred cows based on lifetime production performance (Khan et al., 2012). These researchers reported greater calving rate and calf survivability and lower calving intervals of RCC compared to crossbred cows. In addition, feed requirements, health and reproduction costs of RCC were lower compared to crossbred cows. The fat content of RCC milk (4.8%; Table 6) was greater than indigenous and Holstein crossbreds in Bangladesh (3.7 and 3.4%, respectively for indigenous and crossbreds; Islam et al., 2014b). Also, RCC milk contained greater milk protein and lactose (3.8 and 5.6%, respectively; Table 6) compared to indigenous cattle (3.6 and 5.1%, respectively), Holstein crossbreds (2.7 and 4.6%, respectively), and buffaloes (3.5 and 4.7%, respectively) (Islam et al., 2014b).

Table 6

ParametersAverageSDNMinimumMaximumTotal cattle observation
Lactation length, days22824231612652,805
Lactation milk production, L618124214538381,579
Milk composition, % fresh milk
Lactose5.60.2165.35.8119
Milk protein3.80.25123.24.1199
Milk fat4.80.39134.25.3211
Solids not fat (SNF)9.40.941310.88.1211
Total solids141.24131316211
Ash0.30.3230.20.746

Milk production of Red Chittagong cattle and its composition.

SD, standard deviation; N, number of articles that reported the parameters. From Alam et al. (2007), Asaduzzaman et al. (2017a), Asaduzzaman et al. (2017b), Azizunnesa et al. (2010), Bag et al. (2010), Bhuiyan et al. (2008), Debnath et al. (2003), Ferdous et al. (2019), Habib et al. (2003), Habib et al. (2009), Habib et al. (2010a), Hasanuzzaman et al. (2012), Hossain et al. (2018), Huque et al. (2010), Islam et al. (2015), Khan and Mostari (2015), Khan et al. (2000), Khan et al. (2010), Khan et al. (2012), Mostari et al. (2007), Nath et al. (2016), Rahman et al. (2016), Reza et al. (2008), Sarker et al. (2015), and Sarker et al. (2019).

Disease Resistance

The prevalence of diseases and parasites in RCC is presented in Table 7. RCC cattle is more resistant to common diseases and parasites than other native and crossbreds. The prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in RCC was about 9 and 16% lower than local cattle and crossbreds, respectively (Ahmed et al., 2015; Chowdhury et al., 2017). Blood parasites were also 4% less prevalent in RCC than crossbreds (Siddiki et al., 2010). Subclinical mastitis in RCC was half the prevalence in crossbreds (Quaderi et al., 2013).

Table 7

Prevalence of diseases and parasites (% cattle)Cattle genotypesTotal cattle observation
Red Chittagong cattleLocalCrossbreds
Gastrointestinal parasites556471100
Blood parasites9-13560
Subclinical mastitis283156198

Prevalence of diseases and parasites in Red Chittagong cattle.

From Ahmed et al. (2015), Chowdhury et al. (2017), Quaderi et al. (2013), and Siddiki et al. (2010).

Conclusions and Recommendations

Red Chittagong cattle are a red colored, small-sized genotype that are more fertile and resistant to common parasites and diseases compared to crossbreds and suitable for the small-holder farmers in the tropics. This genotype has the potential to be developed as a native dairy cattle breed of Bangladesh by the establishment of a well-planned, long-term, selective breeding program due to the high genetic and phenotypic variation within the current population. Also, promoting the benefits of this genotype across Bangladesh may help conserve this genetic resource at a farm level. A long-term plan is necessary to benchmark its current distribution throughout Bangladesh and its impact on smallholder farming. In addition, research is required as to the mechanisms enabling their resistance to environmental stress and tropical diseases.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Author contributions

ND literature search, data synthesis, imagery processing, and drafting manuscript. CC and MI conceptualizing, literature search, drafting reviewing, and editing of manuscripts. CC, MI, NS, and MJ supervising the work. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AfrozM. A.HoqueM. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H. (2011). Estimation of heritability for growth traits of Red Chittagong cattle in a nucleus herd. Bang. Veterinar. 28, 39–46. 10.3329/bvet.v28i1.8812

  • 2

    AfrozM. A.HoqueM. A.HabibM. A.CarvalheiraJ. G. V.BhuiyanA. K. F. H. (2012). Estimation of adjustment factors for standardizing age and season corrected 305-day milk yield and estimation of heritability and repeatability of standardized milk yield of Red Chittagong cattle. Ind. J. Anim. Sci.82, 879–883.

  • 3

    AhmedR.BiswasP. K.BaruaM.AlimM. A.IslamK.IslamM. Z. (2015). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasitism of cattle in Banskhali upazilla, Chittagong, Bangladesh. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2, 484–488. 10.5455/javar.2015.b113

  • 4

    Aidara-KaneA.AnguloF. J.ConlyJ. M.MinatoY.SilbergeldE. K.McEwenS. A.et al. (2018). World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Contr.7:7. 10.1186/s13756-017-0294-9

  • 5

    AlamM.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.AliA.MamunA. (2007). Genetic analysis of birth weight and milk production of Red Chittagong cattle of Bangladesh. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 36, 24–32.

  • 6

    AminM. R.HabibM. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H. (2013). Reproductive potential of Red Chittagong cattle in Bangladesh. J. Trop. Resour. Sust. Sci. 1, 71–86.

  • 7

    AsaduzzamanM.AminM. R.HuqueK. S. (2017a). Study on the on-farm pre-natal nutritional status of red chittagong cows in selected breeding habitat of satkania upazila of Chittagong District of Bangladesh. Agri. Forest. Fish. 6, 155–160. 10.11648/j.aff.20170605.12

  • 8

    AsaduzzamanM.AminM. R.HuqueK. S. (2017b). Study on the on-farm post-natal nutritional status of red chittagong cows in selected breeding habitat of satkania upazila of Chittagong District of Bangladesh. Anim. Vet. Sci. 5, 57–62. 10.11648/j.avs.20170504.12

  • 9

    AsaduzzamanM.AminM. R.SarkarN. R.HuqueK. S. (2019). Development of productive and reproductive potential of pregnant Red Chittagong cows through improved feeding in small scale dairy farm. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 48, 42–4710.3329/bjas.v48i1.44558

  • 10

    AzizunnesaS. B. C.HasanuzzamanM.MiaziO. F.AktaruzzamanM.FarukM. O. (2010). Study on the Productive and Reproductive Performances of Red Chittagong Cow at rural areas in Chittagong. Rajshahi Univ. J. Zool. 28, 27–31. 10.3329/ujzru.v28i0.5282

  • 11

    BagM. A. S.MannanM. A.KhanM. S. R.ParvezM. M.UllahS. M. (2010). Morphometric characterization and present status of Red Chittagong cattle in Chittagong district in Bangladesh. Inter. J. Biol. Res. 1, 11–14.

  • 12

    BBS (2011). Bangladesh Bureau of statistics (BBS). District Statistics 2011, Chittagong. Agriculture census, 2008. Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 31–58. Available online at: http://203.112.218.65:8008/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/District%20Statistics/Chittagong.pdf (accessed March 25, 2021).

  • 13

    BhuiyanA. K. F. H. (2013). "Farm animal genetic diversity country report-Bangladesh," in Farm Animal Genetic Resources in SAARC Countries: Diversity, Conservation and Management, eds A. K. F. H. Bhuiyan, M. M. Hossain, and Deb [Mymensingh; Dhaka: Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University; SAARC Agriculture Centre (SAC)], 2202, 1215.

  • 14

    BhuiyanA. K. F. H.HossainM. M.DebG. K. (2007b). Indigenous cattle genetic resources of Bangladesh and a way forward to their development. Bang. J. Prog. Sci. Tech. 5, 105–112.

  • 15

    BhuiyanA. K. F. H.lslamS. S.AshrafA.HabibM. A. (2008). Research on Characterization, Conservation and Improvement of Red Chittagong Cattle of Bangladesh. Final Technical Report. Mymensingh: Department of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, 2202.

  • 16

    BhuiyanA. K. F. H.ShahjalalM.IslamM. N.RahmanA. K. M. A.KewonJ. F.VanVleckL. D. (2005). Characterization, conservation and improvement of Red Chittagong Cattle of Bangladesh. Bang. Agric. Univ. Res. Prog. 16, 13–21.

  • 17

    BhuiyanM. S. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.YoonD. H.JeonJ. T.ParkC. S.LeeJ. H. (2007a). Mitochondrial DNA diversity and origin of Red Chittagong Cattle. Asian-Austr. J. Anim. Sci.20, 1478–1484. 10.5713/ajas.2007.1478

  • 18

    BLRI (2004). Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute. First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources (AnGR). Animal Genetic Resources of Bangladesh. Savar; Dhaka: The Government of the Peoples' Republic of Bangladesh.

  • 19

    BSR (2018). Baseline Survey Report. Red Chittagong Cattle Improvement and Conservation Project (2nd phase). Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka. Ministry of fisheries and Livestock. Savar; Dhaka: People's Republic of Bangladesh.

  • 20

    ChowdhuryR.SenA.KarJ.NathS. K. (2017). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasitism of cattle at Chandaniash Upazilla, Chittagong, Bangladesh. Inter. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci.4, 144–149.

  • 21

    DasN. G.SarkerN. R.HuqueK. S.TalukdarM. A. I. (2018). Study of on-farm pre and post-natal feeding practices of Red Chittagong cattle. Bang. J. Lives. Res. 21–25, 159–167. 10.3329/bjlr.v0i0.45459

  • 22

    DebnathG. K.KoberA. K. M. H.ChandaT.HoqueM. A.HalimM. A. (2003). Effect of supplementary concentrate feeding on milk production, quality and body weight changes of Red Chittagong cows and their calves under village management condition. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.6, 945–947. 10.3923/pjbs.2003.945.947

  • 23

    FerdousF.ChoudhuryM. P.FaruqueM. O.HossainM. M.BhuiyanA. K. F. H. (2019). Genetic evaluation of Red Chittagong cattle in Bangladesh. SAARC J. Agric. 17, 141–154. 10.3329/sja.v17i2.45301

  • 24

    HabibM.PollottG. E.LeaverJ. D. (2008). Effect of cattle genotype and variable feed supply on forage intake and digestibility. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21, 1435–1440. 10.5713/ajas.2008.80007

  • 25

    HabibM. A.AfrozM. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H. (2010a). Lactation performance of Red Chittagong cattle and effects of environmental factors. The Bang. Vet. 27, 18–25. 10.3329/bvet.v27i1.5911

  • 26

    HabibM. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.AminM. R. (2009). Birth weight and its non-genetic effect in Red Chittagong Cattle (RCC) in a closed nucleus herd. Inter. J. Biol. Res. 1, 35–39. 10.3329/bjas.v39i1-2.9673

  • 27

    HabibM. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.AminM. R. (2010b). Reproductive performance of Red Chittagong cattle in a nucleus herd. Bang. J. Anim. Sci.39, 9–19.

  • 28

    HabibM. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.BhuiyanM. S. A.KhanA. A. (2003). Performance of Red Chittagong cattle in Bangladesh Agricultural University dairy farm. Bang. J. Anim. Sci.32, 101–108.

  • 29

    HalimM. A.KashemM. A.AhmedJ. U.HossainM. (2010). Economic analysis of Red Chittagong cattle farming system in some selected areas of Chittagong district. J. Bang. Agri. Univ. 8, 271–276. 10.3329/jbau.v8i2.7937

  • 30

    HamidM. A.RahmanA.ZamanM. A.HossainK. M. (2017). Cattle genetic resources and their conservation in Bangladesh. Asian J. Anim. Sci.11, 54–64. 10.3923/ajas.2017.54.64

  • 31

    HasanuzzamanM.HossainM. E.IslamM. M.BegumM. R.ChowdhuryS.HossainM. Z. (2012). Performance of Red Chittagong cattle in some selected areas of Chittagong district of Bangladesh. Bang. J. Anim. Sci.41, 29–34. 10.3329/bjas.v41i1.11973

  • 32

    HossainM. M. (2005). Characterization and distribution pattern of Red Chittagong Cattle of Bangladesh. (M.S. Thesis). Mymensingh: Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University.

  • 33

    HossainS. M. J.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.AfrozM. F.KabirM. A.MirazM. F. H.HabibM. (2018). Growth Performance of Red Chittagong cattle based on phenotypic and genetic parameters. Int. J. Anim. Sci.2:1025.

  • 34

    HuqueK. S.SarkarN. R.MuftiM. M. R.DasN. G. (2010). A Compendium on Red Chittagong Cattle of Bangladesh. Savar: Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute.

  • 35

    IslamM. A.AlamM. K.IslamM. N.KhanM. A. S.EkebergD.RukkeE. O.et al. (2014b). Principal Milk Components in buffalo, Holstein cross, indigenous cattle and Red Chittagong cattle from Bangladesh. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27, 886–897. 10.5713/ajas.2013.13586

  • 36

    IslamM. R.UddinM. N.AkandaM. R.KhanM. M. H.BasetM. A.BelalS. A. (2015). Effect of milk urea nitrogen of dairy cows in relation to breed. Iranian J. Appl. Anim. Sci.5, 279–283.

  • 37

    IslamM. T.ShosheN. Z.IslamM. T.HowladerM. M. R.IslamM. S. (2014a). Evaluation of productive and reproductive performances of indigenous and crossbred dairy cows at Sylhet district in Bangladesh. J. Sylhet Agri. Univ. 1, 155–159.

  • 38

    KamalM. M. (2010). A review on cattle reproduction in Bangladesh. Inter. J. Dairy Sci.5, 245–252. 10.3923/ijds.2010.245.252

  • 39

    KarimM. N.KashemA.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.BhuiyanM. S. A. (2019). Investigation of fitness traits of Red Chittagong cattle of Bangladesh. Inter. J. Natur. Soc. Sci.6, 35–45.

  • 40

    KhanM. K. I.HuqueK. S.MiahA. G.KhatunM. J. (2000). Study on the performance of Red Chittagong cows under different production systems. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.3, 318–319. 10.3923/pjbs.2000.318.319

  • 41

    KhanM. K. I.MiahG.HuqueK. S.KhatunM. J.DasA. (2012). Economic and genetic evaluations of different dairy cattle breeds under rural conditions in Bangladesh. Lives. Res. Rural Dev.24, 1–8.

  • 42

    KhanM. K. I.MiahG.KhatunM. J.DasA. (2010). Economic values for different economic traits of Red Chittagong cows. Ind. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 1138–1140.

  • 43

    KhanM. Y. A.MostariM. P. (2015). “Study on candidate genes for milk production traits of Red Chittagong cattle,” in Proceedings of the Annual Research Review Workshop 2014-2015. (Savar: Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute), 1341.

  • 44

    LeiblerJ. H.DaltonK.PekoszA.GrayG. C.SilbergeldE. K. (2017). Epizootics in industrial livestock production: preventable gaps in biosecurity and biocontainment. Zoonoses Public Health64, 137–145. 10.1111/zph.12292

  • 45

    MasonI. L. (1988). A World Dictionary of Livestock Breeds, Types and Varieties, 3rd Edn. Oxford Shire: CAB International.

  • 46

    MasonJ. L.BuvanendranV. (1982). Breeding Plans for Ruminant Livestock in the Tropics. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper (Rome), 34–89.

  • 47

    MostariM. P.HuqueK. S.HasanatM. S.GulshanZ. (2007). Productive and reproductive performances of Red Chittagong cattle under farm condition. Progr. Agric. 18, 109–114. 10.3329/pa.v18i2.18166

  • 48

    NaharS.IslamA. F. M. F.HoqueM. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H. (2016). Animal performance of indigenous Red Chittagong cattle in Bangladesh. Acta Scientiarum. Anim. Sci.38:177–182. 10.4025/actascianimsci.v38i2.28718

  • 49

    NathS. K.DashA. K.AlamR.BhowmikD. K.AzamN. E.MokbulS. B.et al. (2016). Productive and reproductive performance of Red Chittagong cattle in rural rearing system of Bangladesh. Asian J. Sci. Technol. 7, 3152–3156.

  • 50

    NyamushambaG. B.MapiyeC.TadaO.HalimaniT. E.MuchenjeV. (2017). Conservation of indigenous cattle genetic resources in Southern Africa's smallholder areas: turning threats into opportunities — a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci.30, 603–621. 10.5713/ajas.16.0024

  • 51

    QuaderiM. A. A. L.HusainM.AlamM. G. S.KhatunM.HossainM. A. (2013). Prevalence of sub-clinical mastitis in dairy farms. The Bang. Veterinarian. 30, 70–77. 10.3329/bvet.v30i2.18257

  • 52

    RabeyaT.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.HabibM. A.HossainM. S. (2009). Phenotypic and genetic parameters for growth traits in Red Chittagong Cattle of Bangladesh. J. Bang. Agril. Univ.7, 265–271. 10.3329/jbau.v7i2.4733

  • 53

    RahmanF.AlamM. P.HoqueM. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H. (2016). Genotype and environmental interaction in growth and milk yield traits of indigenous Red Chittagong cattle. J. Bios. Agric. Res. 11, 955–962. 10.18801/jbar.110216.117

  • 54

    RezaM. S. A.BhuiyanA. K. F. H.HabibM. A.RabeyaT. (2008). Evaluation of Red Chittagong cows based in test day milk production. Progr. Agric. 19, 101–109. 10.3329/pa.v19i2.16950

  • 55

    SarkerN. R.BasharM. K.HossainS. M. J.AlamM. K.HuqueK. S. (2015). Study on feeding effect of different levels of protein and energy on production performance of pregnant mother and neo-natal calves. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 5, 81–89. 10.17265/2161-6256/2015.02A.001

  • 56

    SarkerN. R.YeasminD.HabibM. A.TabassumF. (2019). Feeding effect of total mixed ration on milk yield, nutrient intake, digestibility and rumen environment in Red Chittagong cows. Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 5, 71–77. 10.3329/ajmbr.v5i1.41048

  • 57

    SiddikiA. Z.UddinM. B.HasanM. B.HossainM. F.RahmanM. M.DasB. C.et al. (2010). Coproscopic and haematological approaches to determine the prevalence of helminthiasis and protozoan diseases of Red Chittagong breed in Bangladesh. Pakistan Vet. J. 30, 1–6.

  • 58

    SilbergeldE. K. (2019). One health and the agricultural transition in food animal production. Glob. Transitions. 1, 83–92. 10.1016/j.glt.2019.01.003

  • 59

    SultanaZ. S. (2018). “Animal breeding policies and strategies in Bangladesh,” in Animal Breeding Policies and Strategies in South Asia, ed N. A. Siddiky (Dhaka: SAARC Agriculture Centre), 6–27.

Summary

Keywords

Bangladesh, genetic variation, heritability, milk production, morphology, origin and distribution

Citation

Das NG, Islam MR, Sarker NR, Jalil MA and Clark CEF (2021) Red Chittagong Cattle: An Indigenous Breed to Help Tackle the Challenges of Modern Animal Production Systems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5:688641. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.688641

Received

31 March 2021

Accepted

20 July 2021

Published

12 August 2021

Volume

5 - 2021

Edited by

Pablo Gregorini, Lincoln University, New Zealand

Reviewed by

Hiroki Anzai, University of Miyazaki, Japan; Marco Acciaro, Agris Sardinia, Italy

Updates

Copyright

© 2021 Das, Islam, Sarker, Jalil and Clark.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nani Gopal Das

This article was submitted to Agroecology and Ecosystem Services, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics