Frontiers | Field notes

Field notes post list

6 field-notes posts in Research integrity and ethics

Research integrity and ethics

28 Apr 2026

Common mistakes in publishing: copyrighted materials

Submitting a research paper can feel like the final step in a long research journey. After months or years of work, the manuscript is finally ready for submission. But during the production stage of publishing, many manuscripts encounter the same avoidable problem: the incorrect use of images, figures, or other copyrighted materials. For early-career researchers in particular, copyright rules can be confusing. Many mistakes happen because authors assume that materials found online are free to reuse.

Research integrity and ethics

24 Apr 2026

AI literacy for researchers: how to use AI responsibly without compromising your work

Artificial intelligence is already transforming every part of the research process. Increasing numbers of researchers are integrating AI into their everyday workflows, yet many remain uncertain about how to use these tools both responsibly and to their full potential. AI literacy, knowing when to use these tools, when not to, and how to stay accountable for the output, is becoming a core research skill. We spoke with Simone Ragavooloo, Research Integrity Portfolio Manager at Frontiers, about why it matters and how researchers can protect both their own work and the credibility of science.

Research integrity and ethics

16 Mar 2026

What do journal editors do? A guide for researchers

When you submit a manuscript to an academic journal, its scientific evaluation is controlled almost entirely by other researchers. Publisher workflows and industry standards govern peer review, but the people assessing your work are working scientists. They volunteer their expertise to evaluate, improve, and ultimately decide what gets published. Understanding who these people are and how they work can change the way you approach the submission and peer review process. It can help you interpret decisions, respond more effectively to feedback, and see where editorial work fits within the broader research ecosystem.