Abstract
Advances in the design of novel porous materials open new avenues for the development of chromatographic solid stationary phases. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are promising candidates in this context due to their remarkable structural versatility and exceptional chemical and textural properties. In this minireview, we summarize the main strategies followed in recent years to apply these materials as stationary phases for chromatographic separations. We also comment on the perspectives of this new research field and potential directions to expand the applicability and implementation of COF stationary phases in analytical systems.
1 Introduction
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are highly crystalline organic polymers with large surface area, tunable pore size and geometry, versatile functionalization, and relatively high thermal and chemical stability. Their crystallinity arises from the dynamic nature of the covalent bonds that join the building blocks, which allows the self-healing and error correction of the backbone during the synthesis and gives rise to the most thermodynamically stable structure (; ). Due to their outstanding properties, COFs present great potential in several applications such as supercapacitors and batteries (; ), gas adsorption (; ), catalysis (; ), separation (), sensing (; ) and optoelectronics (). Moreover, extensive research has been developed on using COFs for membrane-based separations (). Still, the application of these materials in column-based separations has been much less explored. Chromatography is the most widely applied method for accurate analysis and separation in many fields, such as clinical analysis (), pharmaceutical industry (), food and beverage testing (), environmental detection (), and control of industrial chemical processes (), among others. The most crucial component in a chromatographic system is the stationary phase. In this regard, the separation efficiency depends on establishing several noncovalent interactions between the stationary phase and the analytes. Due to the control on pore size and chemistry, high surface area, and stability, COFs are gaining much attention as stationary phases for chromatographic separations (; ). Thus, over the last few years, three main approaches have been developed for the preparation of stationary phases based on COFs: i) direct packing of COF powders in columns, alone or mixed with another material (Figure 1); ii) preparation of composites involving COFs and other materials (Figure 2A); and iii) formation of COF coatings in capillary columns (Figure 2B). This minireview summarizes the recent developments in COF chromatographic stationary phases following these strategies (Table 1). We warn that works that assert the use of COFs as stationary phases without demonstrating their crystallinity and/or porosity have not been included in this revision.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

(A) Strategies that have been used to prepare stationary phases based on core-shell COF composites with silica microspheres: (i) in situ growth, (ii) two-step growth, (iii) layer-by-layer growth, and (iv) in situ growth followed by post-synthetic modification. (B) Strategies that have been used to prepare stationary phases based on COF chemical coatings: (i) in situ growth on the capillary walls and (ii) physical adsorption/covalent attachment of pre-synthesized COF particles.
TABLE 1
| Strategy | Stationary phase | Crystallinitya | BET surface area (m2 g-1) | Application | Performanceb | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COF powder | Lysozyme⊂COF 1 | High | 103 | HPLC separation of racemates of amino acids and chiral drugs | High | |
| Peptide⊂COF 1 | High | -c | Low | |||
| Lysine⊂COF 1 | High | -c | Failed | |||
| COF powder—spherical particles | SCOFs-2.0 µm | High | 364 | LC separation of PAHs, anilines, alkylbenzenes, halogenated nitrobenzenes, phthalates, BSA tryptic digest | Failed | |
| SCOFs-1.5 µm | High | 569 | Low | |||
| SCOFs-1.0 µm | High | 856 | High/Good | |||
| SCOFs-0.8 µm | High | 1,167 | Failedd | |||
| COF powder—spherical particles | SF-COFs | Moderate | 170 | HPLC separation of organic halides, organic compounds with different hydrophobicity and aromatic ring structures | Highe | |
| COF powder—single crystals | Single-crystalline | High | 602 | HPLC separation of positional isomers of disubstituted benzenes, alkylbenzenes, monosubstituted aromatics and PAHs | High | |
| COF-300 | ||||||
| Mixture with cellulose derivative | CDMPC@SCOF CSP1 | High | 108 | HPLC separation of racemates and chiral fungicides | Low | |
| CDMPC@SCOF CSP2 | High | 64 | Good | |||
| CDMPC@SCOF CSP3 | High | 45 | High | |||
| Mixture with SiO2 particles | CCOF 5 | Highf | 655f | HPLC separation of racemic alcohols | Good | |
| CCOF 6 | Highf | 613f | High | |||
| Mixture with SiO2 particles | COF 1 | Highf | 666f | HPLC separation of ethylbenzene and xylene isomers and other benzene derivatives | High | |
| COF 1-Zn | Highf | 460f | Low | |||
| COF 2 | Highf | 701f | High | |||
| COF 2-Zn | Highf | 535f | Low | |||
| Mixture with SiO2 particles | PFPP-COF-1a | Highf | 874f | HPLC separation of PAHs | Low | |
| PFPP-COF-1b | Highf | 1,027f | Low | |||
| PFPP-COF-2 | Highf | 1,698f | Highg | |||
| Mixture with SiO2 particles—“Wrapped in Net Method” | CSP-1 | Highf | - | HPLC separation of racemates and chiral drugs | High/Good | |
| CSP-2 | Highf | - | High/Good | |||
| Mixture with SiO2 particles—“Wrapped in Net Method” | CD-PlasmaCOF-CSP-1 | Highf | 581f | HPLC separation of racemates and chiral drugs | High/Good | |
| CD-PlasmaCOF-CSP-2 | Highf | 335f | High/Good | |||
| Mixture with polymer monolith | 3D-IL-COF-1 | Low | 251 | HPLC separation of neutral, acidic, basic, and isomers of organic compounds | Highh | |
| Mixture with polymer monolith | CTzDa-monolith | Moderate | 252 | HPLC separation of racemic amino acids | Highi | |
| Composites—In situ growth | BtaMth@SiO2 | High | 723f | HPLC separation of nitroaromatics isomers/β-cypermethrin and metconazole cis-trans isomers | Good | |
| HPLC separation of β-cypermethrin and metconazole enantiomers | Failed | |||||
| Composites—In situ growth | CTpBD@SiO2 | Low | 260 | HPLC enantiomeric separation of 20 different pairs of enantiomers | Good | |
| Composites—In situ growth | β-CD-COF@SiO2 | Moderate | - | HPLC enantiomeric separation of 24 different pairs of enantiomers | High | |
| Composites—In situ growth | SiO2@COF | -j | 306 | HPLC separation of alkylbenzenes, PAHs, positional isomers, nucleosides, anilines and sulfanilamides | High | Zheng et al. (2021b) |
| Composites—Two-step growth | TpBD@SiO2 | Moderate | 385 | HPLC separation of PAHs, acidic, basic and aromatic compounds, and nucleobases, nucleosides, and deoxynucleosides | Highh | |
| Composites—Two-step growth | COF-300@SiO2 | High | 254 | HPLC separation of PAHs, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, photosensitizers, drugs, alkaloids | High | |
| HPLC separation of substituted benzenes, nucleosides and nucleobases | Good | |||||
| Composites—Two-step growth | NPS@TPB-DMTP | High | 177 | HPLC separation of monosubstituted benzenes, PAHs, alkylbenzenes, anilines and phthalates | High | |
| Composites—Layer-by-layer reaction | COF-300@SiO2 | High | 431 | HPLC separation of benzene homologues, PAHs and substituted aromatics | High | |
| Composites—Post-synthetic modification | Sil-COF | Low | 328 | HPLC separation of alkylbenzenes and PAHs | Good | |
| Sil-COF-CD | Low | - | HPLC separation of 2-phenylpropionic acid and 1-phenyl-1-propanol enantiomers | High | ||
| Composites—Post-synthetic modification | SiO2@rLZU1 | Low | 194 | HPLC separation of PAHs and benzene derivatives | High | |
| HPLC separation of tar, phenol, ammonia and other substances present in cooking wastewater | Good | |||||
| Composites—Post-synthetic modification | COF@CD@SiO2 | -j | 298 | HPLC separation of enantiomers, positional isomers, alkylbenzenes and PAHs | High | Zheng et al. (2022c) |
| Dynamic coating | TpBD | Moderatek | 885f | GC separation of alkanes, cyclohexane and benzene, α- and β-pinene, and alcohols | Highl | |
| Chemical coating—In situ growth | CTpPa-1 | Moderatem | 146f | GC separation of racemates | Highn | |
| CTpPa-2 | Moderatem | 104f | Highn | |||
| CTpBD | Moderatem | 317f | Highn | |||
| Chemical coating—In situ growth | BtaMth | Moderatek | - | GC separation of alkanes, alcohols, and aromatic positional isomers | High/Good | |
| Chemical coating—In situ growth | COF-V | Moderatem | - | CEC separation of benzene derivatives, antileptic drugs, herbicides, active ingredients in Chinese medicine | High | |
| Chemical coating—In situ growth | TAPB-BPTA | Low | - | CEC separation of benzene derivatives, NSAIDs and parabens | High | |
| Chemical coating—In situ growth | TpTFMB | Moderate | 964f | GC separation of isomers of benzene derivatives, alkenes, and acetates | High | |
| TpPa-CF3 | Moderate | 1,306f | High/Good | |||
| Chemical coating—In situ growth | SCOF-303 (1.6 µm) | High | - | GC separation of isomers of xylene, dichlorobenzene and pinene | High/Goodo | |
| SCOF-303 (1.2 µm) | Moderate | - | Higho | |||
| SCOF-303 (0.8 µm) | Moderate | - | Higho | |||
| SCOF-303 (0.4 µm) | Moderate | - | Higho | |||
| Chemical coating—covalent attachment | Tf-DHzOH | Highm | 82 | CEC separation of amino acids, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, and benzene derivatives | High | |
| Chemical coating—covalent attachment | TFA-TAPB | Lowm | - | CEC separation of fluoroquinolones | High | Zong et al. (2022) |
| Chemical coating—covalent attachment | JUC-515 | Moderatem | - | CEC separation of fluoroquinolones | High |
Summary of stationary phases based on COFs.
Crystallinity is classified in “High” “Moderate” or “Low” considering the intensity, signal-to-noise ratio, and half-width of the characteristic signals appearing in the XRD diffractograms.
Performance is classified in “High”, “Good”, “Low” and “Failed” according to the resolution of the peaks in the chromatograms.
Lower than surface area of Lysozyme⊂COF 1.
High back-pressure prevented the measurement.
Better than commercial C18 and pentafluorophenyl columns.
Pristine COF or as-prepared COF.
Better than ZORBAX Eclipse PAH column in resolution.
Better than C18 column.
Better than Poroshell 120 chiral-T column.
Data not available.
Pristine COF heated up to 250 °C.
Better than HP-5 column.
Measurement was made on a coating analog.
Better than β-DEX 225 and Cyclosil B columns.
Performance increases with the decrease of particle size in the coating.
2 Stationary phases based on COF powders
2.1 Pure COF powders
The most straightforward approach to using a COF as a stationary phase involves packing the powder material directly on the chromatographic column (Figure 1). In 2018, Ma et al. designed several chiral stationary phases by immobilizing optically active biomolecules into a new imide-linked COF 1 (
However, the direct use of COF solvothermal powders is often restricted due to the polydispersion in sizes, irregular shape of COF particles, and their small crystal size. This usually results in high back-pressure and low column efficiency. A way to overcome these issues involves preparing micron-sized COFs with regular spherical shapes. This strategy was employed by Lin and co-workers (
Another way of controlling particle size and shape relies on developing single-crystalline COF particles. This approach was recently applied to prepare new HPLC stationary phases (
2.2 Mixtures with other materials
The physical mixing of COFs with other materials (Figure 1) can introduce new separation properties in the stationary phases. For example, Cai and co-workers prepared chiral stationary phases by mixing a cellulose derivative with spherical COFs (
In 2018, they reported a new 3D chiral COF, CCOF 5, based on the solvothermal reaction of a TADDOL-derived tetraaldehyde with a tetrafunctionalized amine. The post-synthetic oxidation of the imine linkages gave rise to the amide-linked CCOF 6. Both materials presented good crystallinity and high BET surface area. The HPLC-packed columns were prepared by mixing ∼0.3 μm COF particles with silica microspheres with an average size of 5 μm. Several alcohol racemates were selected to evaluate the chromatographic properties of the columns. The experiments revealed superior resolution performance for the amide-linked COF compared to the pristine material, which was attributed to stronger interactions between the amide groups and alcohol guests in the pore channels (
COFs have also been incorporated into porous polymer monolithic columns to reduce column back-pressure (
As the main conclusions of this section, we can say, on the one hand, that the use of pure COF powders with controlled geometry and size alleviates the problems associated with high column back-pressures, although there are still issues when the particle size is small (sub-micrometric range). This could be inconvenient when dealing with samples of difficult separation since decreasing the particle size is usually related to a better resolution performance. On the other hand, using mixtures with other materials, namely silica particles and polymer monoliths, has also been demonstrated to be beneficial in decreasing column back-pressure. However, this improvement is achieved at the expense of losing part or most of the pivotal properties of COFs, i.e., crystallinity and surface area. New research efforts should focus on attaining suitable column back-pressures with minimum loss of these essential attributes of COFs.
3 Stationary phases based on COF composites
As mentioned in the previous section, COF powders as stationary phases for chromatography usually present the drawbacks of their wide particle size distribution and the irregularity of their shape, leading to inefficient packing, high column back-pressure, and poor separation performance. Packing the columns with COF–silica mixtures helps reduce these issues and it uses less active material, but can suffer from COF leaching during column runs. To avoid this problem, covalent COF@SiO2 core-shell composites can be prepared to immobilize COFs on the surface of silica microspheres (Figure 2A). This methodology has been successfully accomplished via four different strategies.
3.1 In situ growth method
The most straightforward approach to preparing these core-shell composites consists of adding silica microspheres functionalized with amine groups on their surface (SiO2-NH2) to the COF synthetic medium. Thus, as the COF forms, it is simultaneously anchored to the surface of the silica microspheres via the same covalent bonds that act as COF linkages. This has been achieved with hydrazone-based (
In a first work, Zhang and co-workers used this approach to immobilize the novel hydrazone-based BtaMth COF on the surface of 5 μm SiO2-NH2 microspheres (
This strategy has also been applied to chiral imine-based COFs by Xie and collaborators (
3.2 Two-step growth method
A slightly more sophisticated version of the in situ growth approach involves a first reaction of the SiO2-NH2 microspheres with the aldehyde monomer of the COF (
The first example of this approach was reported by Yan and co-workers (
3.3 Layer-by-layer reaction
To ascertain complete control over the coating thickness, Yan and collaborators applied a layer-by-layer approach to preparing COF@SiO2 composites (
3.4 Post-synthetic modification
Post-synthetic modification (PSM) is a potent approach to introduce functionality into COFs after they have been formed, thus avoiding incompatibilities between the desired functionalities and, for instance, the reaction medium used to obtain the COF (
This approach has been used by different research groups (Zheng Y. et al., 2022;
Finally, Li and co-workers reported a different use of the PSM approach; instead of attaching new moieties to the framework, the authors made a post-synthetic imine-to-amine linkage reduction (
In conclusion, the development of covalent COF@SiO2 core-shell composites offers a promising approach to overcome the issues associated with COF powders. While straightforward and one-pot, the in-situ growth method lacks precise control over the COF coating. In contrast, growing the COFs in steps or employing a PSM affords a finer control of the material and allows tuning of the properties, at the expense of being more complex to implement. Ongoing research aims at a straightforward methodology to control the thickness and functionalization of the COF shell, which would facilitate achieving baseline separation of racemates and complex mixtures.
4 Stationary phases based on COF coatings
Several COFs have also been coated on capillary columns to produce stationary phases for gas chromatography and electrochromatography (CEC) separations (
4.1 Dynamic coating
In 2015, Yan and co-workers reported the preparation of the imine-linked COF TpBD as spherical micron-sized particles using a facile synthesis at room temperature (
4.2 Chemical coating
Chemical coating implies the COF’s covalent immobilization to the capillary column’s inner surface. This approach can render more stable stationary phases than a dynamic coating, which occasionally may require regeneration of the column (
The second strategy to obtain coatings of COFs chemically bound to capillary columns is based on the covalent attachment of the pre-synthesized COF particles (
Therefore, coating COFs on capillary columns opens new opportunities for gas and electrochromatography applications. However, it is still challenging to determine if the crystallinity and surface area of the pristine COFs is preserved in the prepared coatings and under the working conditions of gas chromatography. New research should also focus on optimizing the control of coating thickness and roughness.
5 Conclusion and future outlook
There are various types of porous materials that, due to their properties, can be attractive alternatives to classical stationary phases based on silica and organic polymers. In particular, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), COFs, and zeolites present excellent designability, which offers a fine control on chemical functionalization and pore size distributions, which are found typically in the micropore and mesopore range (
Current strategies to prepare COF stationary phases, mainly based on the column packing with controlled shape and size particles, mixtures, and composites, and COF-coating on capillary columns, have demonstrated good to excellent results in the chromatographic separation of several substrates, including basic, neutral and acidic small organic molecules, positional isomers, racemates, and PAHs. Therefore, it is worth continuing to investigate these approaches. However, each of these strategies has some drawbacks, such as the usual increase in back-pressure when sub-micron-sized particles are employed, the loss of surface area of the pristine material in mixtures and composites, and the complex and long synthetical procedures associated with the preparation of some composites and coatings. In this regard, work on new processing methodologies can help to overcome some of these disadvantages. Moreover, conducting more research on the separation and purification of added-value compounds would be interesting, which could open new business opportunities and academia-industry collaborations.
Statements
Author contributions
RG: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SR: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. FZ: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing, Funding acquisition.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. We thank the financial support to the Spanish MICINN (PID 2022-138908NB-C31, PDC 2022-133498-I00 and TED 2021-129886B-C42) and through the “María de Maeztu” Programme for Units of Excellence in R&D (CEX 2018-000805-M). This work was also supported by the Comunidad de Madrid (MAD2D-CM) and MICINN (Planes complementarios, Materiales Avanzados). FZ also acknowledges support from the European Innovation Council under grant Agreement 101047081 (EVA).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BiswalB. P.ChandraS.KandambethS.LukoseB.HeineT.BanerjeeR. (2013). Mechanochemical synthesis of chemically stable isoreticular covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 5328–5331. 10.1021/ja4017842
2
BurkeD. W.JiangZ.LivingstonA. G.DichtelW. R. (2023). 2D covalent organic framework membranes for liquid-phase molecular separations: state of the field, common pitfalls, and future opportunities. Adv. Mater.36, e2300525. 10.1002/adma.202300525
3
ChenL.GaoJ.WuQ.LiH.DongS.ShiX.et al (2019). Preparation and performance of a novel multi-mode COF-300@SiO 2 chromatographic stationary phase. Eur. Polym. J.116, 9–19. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.04.002
4
ChenZ.KirlikovaliK. O.IdreesK. B.WassonM. C.FarhaO. K. (2022). Porous materials for hydrogen storage. Chem8, 693–716. 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.01.012
5
DingS. Y.GaoJ.WangQ.ZhangY.SongW. G.SuC. Y.et al (2011). Construction of covalent organic framework for catalysis: Pd/COF-LZU1 in Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 19816–19822. 10.1021/ja206846p
6
FikarovaK.MooreE.NicolauA.HorstkotteB.MayaF. (2022). Recent trends on the implementation of reticular materials in column-centered separations. J. Sep. Sci.45, 1411–1424. 10.1002/jssc.202100849
7
GengK.HeT.LiuR.DalapatiS.TanK. T.LiZ.et al (2020). Covalent organic frameworks: design, synthesis, and functions. Chem. Rev.120, 8814–8933. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00550
8
GuanX.MaY.LiH.YusranY.XueM.FangQ.et al (2018). Fast, ambient temperature and pressure ionothermal synthesis of three-dimensional covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 4494–4498. 10.1021/jacs.8b01320
9
GuoJ.-X.YangC.YanX.-P. (2021a). “Thiol–ene” click synthesis of chiral covalent organic frameworks for gas chromatography. J. Mater Chem. A Mater9, 21151–21157. 10.1039/D1TA04621G
10
GuoP.YuanB. Y.YuY. Y.ZhangJ. H.WangB. J.XieS. M.et al (2021b). Chiral covalent organic framework core-shell composite CTpBD@SiO2 used as stationary phase for HPLC enantioseparation. Microchim. Acta188, 292. 10.1007/s00604-021-04954-3
11
HanX.HuangJ.YuanC.LiuY.CuiY. (2018). Chiral 3D covalent organic frameworks for high performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 892–895. 10.1021/jacs.7b12110
12
HeN.LiZ.HuC.ChenZ. (2022). In situ synthesis of a spherical covalent organic framework as a stationary phase for capillary electrochromatography. J. Pharm. Anal.12, 610–616. 10.1016/j.jpha.2022.06.005
13
HorvathJ.DolníkV. (2001). Polymer wall coatings for capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis22, 644–655. 10.1002/1522-2683(200102)22:4<644::AID-ELPS644>3.0.CO;2-3
14
HuangJ.HanX.YangS.CaoY.YuanC.LiuY.et al (2019a). Microporous 3D covalent organic frameworks for liquid chromatographic separation of xylene isomers and ethylbenzene. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 8996–9003. 10.1021/jacs.9b03075
15
HuangX. L.LanH. H.YanY. L.ChenG.HeZ. H.ZhangK.et al (2019b). Fabrication of a hydrazone-linked covalent organic framework-bound capillary column for gas chromatography separation. Sep. Sci. Plus2, 120–128. 10.1002/sscp.201800146
16
KellerN.BeinT. (2021). Optoelectronic processes in covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev.50, 1813–1845. 10.1039/d0cs00793e
17
Kočová VlčkováH.PilařováV.SvobodováP.PlíšekJ.ŠvecF.NovákováL. (2018). Current state of bioanalytical chromatography in clinical analysis. Analyst143, 1305–1325. 10.1039/c7an01807j
18
LiH.DilipkumarA.AbubakarS.ZhaoD. (2023). Covalent organic frameworks for CO2 capture: from laboratory curiosity to industry implementation. Chem. Soc. Rev.52, 6294–6329. 10.1039/d2cs00465h
19
LiuF.QianH. L.YangC.YanX. P. (2020). Room-temperature preparation of a chiral covalent organic framework for the selective adsorption of amino acid enantiomers. RSC Adv.10, 15383–15386. 10.1039/d0ra02647f
20
LiuX.YangC.QianH. L.YanX. P. (2021). Three-Dimensional nanoporous covalent organic framework-incorporated monolithic columns for high-performance liquid chromatography. ACS Appl. Nano Mater4, 5437–5443. 10.1021/acsanm.1c00770
21
LohseM. S.BeinT. (2018). Covalent organic frameworks: structures, synthesis, and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater28. 10.1002/adfm.201705553
22
MaT.KapustinE. A.YinS. X.LiangL.ZhouZ.NiuJ.et al (2018). Single-crystal x-ray diffraction structures of covalent organic frameworks. Science361, 48–52. 10.1126/science.aat7679
23
MaT. T.YangC.QianH. L.MaP.LiuT.YanX. P. (2023). Trifluoromethyl-functionalized 2D covalent organic framework for high-resolution separation of isomers. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces15, 32926–32934. 10.1021/acsami.3c05369
24
MametovR.RatiuI.-A.MonedeiroF.LigorT.BuszewskiB. (2021). Evolution and evaluation of GC columns. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.51, 150–173. 10.1080/10408347.2019.1699013
25
MaoZ.ChenZ. (2019). Advances in capillary electro-chromatography. J. Pharm. Anal.9, 227–237. 10.1016/j.jpha.2019.05.002
26
Martínez-FernándezM.GavaraR.RoyuelaS.Fernández-EcijaL.MartínezJ. I.ZamoraF.et al (2022a). Following the light: 3D-printed COF@poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) dual emissive composite with response to polarity and acidity. J. Mater Chem. A Mater10, 4634–4643. 10.1039/d1ta09614a
27
Martínez-FernándezM.Martínez-PeriñánE.RoyuelaS.MartínezJ. I.ZamoraF.LorenzoE.et al (2022b). Covalent organic frameworks based on electroactive naphthalenediimide as active electrocatalysts toward oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Mater Today26, 101384. 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101384
28
Martín-IllánJ. Á.Rodríguez-San-MiguelD.ZamoraF. (2023). Evolution of covalent organic frameworks: from design to real-world applications. Coord. Chem. Rev.495, 215342. 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215342
29
NatrajA.JiW.XinJ.CastanoI.BurkeD. W.EvansA. M.et al (2022). Single-crystalline imine-linked two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks separate benzene and cyclohexane efficiently. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 19813–19824. 10.1021/jacs.2c07166
30
NúñezO.LucciP. (2020). Application of liquid chromatography in food analysis. Foods9, 1277. 10.3390/foods9091277
31
PolloB. J.AlexandrinoG. L.AugustoF.HantaoL. W. (2018). The impact of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography on oil & gas analysis: recent advances and applications in petroleum industry. TrAC - Trends Anal. Chem.105, 202–217. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.05.007
32
QiS. P.TangR.BixuZ.ZhangfanZ. C.et al (2023). Recent progress of covalent organic frameworks-based materials in photocatalytic applications: a review. Small19, e2303632. 10.1002/smll.202303632
33
QianH.-L.LiuF.LiuX.YangC.YanX.-P. (2022b). Chiral covalent organic framework-monolith as stationary phase for high-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation of selected amino acids. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.414, 5255–5262. 10.1007/s00216-021-03574-3
34
QianH. L.WangZ. H.YangJ.YanX. P. (2022a). Building-block exchange synthesis of amino-based three-dimensional covalent organic frameworks for gas chromatographic separation of isomers. Chem. Commun.58, 8133–8136. 10.1039/d2cc02383k
35
QianH. L.YangC.YanX. P. (2018). Layer-by-layer preparation of 3D covalent organic framework/silica composites for chromatographic separation of position isomers. Chem. Commun.54, 11765–11768. 10.1039/c8cc06621c
36
QianH.-L.YangC.-X.YanX.-P. (2016). Bottom-up synthesis of chiral covalent organic frameworks and their bound capillaries for chiral separation. Nat. Commun.7, 12104. 10.1038/ncomms12104
37
QiuH.LiangX.SunM.JiangS. (2011). Development of silica-based stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.399, 3307–3322. 10.1007/s00216-010-4611-x
38
SeguraJ. L.RoyuelaS.Mar RamosM. (2019). Post-synthetic modification of covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev.48, 3903–3945. 10.1039/c8cs00978c
39
SlaterA. G.CooperA. I. (2015). Porous materials. Function-led design of new porous materials. Science348, aaa8075. 10.1126/science.aaa8075
40
SongR.LiY.ChenY.QiuZ.HuangL. (2023). Chiral covalent organic framework incorporated organic polymer monolithic capillary column for enantioseparations. J. Sep. Sci.46, e2201039. 10.1002/jssc.202201039
41
SteinebachF.Müller-SpäthT.MorbidelliM. (2016). Continuous counter-current chromatography for capture and polishing steps in biopharmaceutical production. Biotechnol. J.11, 1126–1141. 10.1002/biot.201500354
42
SunJ.FeiY.TangH.BaoJ.ZhangQ.ZhouX. (2023). Covalent organic frameworks as promising electrode materials for high-valent ion rechargeable batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 10.1021/acsaem.3c01892
43
SunQ.AguilaB.PermanJ.EarlL. D.AbneyC. W.ChengY.et al (2017). Postsynthetically modified covalent organic frameworks for efficient and effective mercury removal. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 2786–2793. 10.1021/jacs.6b12885
44
SunW.LiuY.ZhouW.LiZ.ChenZ. (2021). In-situ growth of a spherical vinyl-functionalized covalent organic framework as stationary phase for capillary electrochromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Talanta230, 122330. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122330
45
SvecF.LvY. (2015). Advances and recent trends in the field of monolithic columns for chromatography. Anal. Chem.87, 250–273. 10.1021/ac504059c
46
TaoR.YangT.WangY.ZhangJ.WuZ.QiuL. (2023). Design strategies of covalent organic framework-based electrodes for supercapacitor application. Chem. Commun.59, 3175–3192. 10.1039/d2cc06573h
47
Uribe-RomoF. J.DoonanC. J.FurukawaH.OisakiK.YaghiO. M. (2011). Crystalline covalent organic frameworks with hydrazone linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 11478–11481. 10.1021/ja204728y
48
WanM.ZhengY.DaiX.YangH.ZhouJ.OuJ.et al (2023). Click chemistry for the preparation of β-cyclodextrin grafting uniform spherical covalent organic framework materials for chiral separation. Chem. Mater.35, 609–616. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03140
49
WangF.ZhangY.WangG.QiS.LvW.LiuJ.et al (2022a). Synthesis of a covalent organic framework with hydrazine linkages and its application in open-tubular capillary electrochromatography. J. Chromatogr. A1661, 462681. 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462681
50
WangL. L.YangC. X.YanX. P. (2017). In situ growth of covalent organic framework shells on silica microspheres for application in liquid chromatography. Chempluschem82, 933–938. 10.1002/cplu.201700223
51
WangX.HanX.ChengC.KangX.LiuY.CuiY. (2022b). 2D covalent organic frameworks with cem topology. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 7366–7373. 10.1021/jacs.2c01082
52
WangX.WuJ.LiuX.QiuX.CaoL.JiY. (2022c). Enhanced chiral recognition abilities of cyclodextrin covalent organic frameworks via chiral/achiral functional modification. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces14, 25928–25936. 10.1021/acsami.2c05572
53
WangY.ZhuoS.HouJ.LiW.JiY. (2019). Construction of β-cyclodextrin covalent organic framework-modified chiral stationary phase for chiral separation. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces11, 48363–48369. 10.1021/acsami.9b16720
54
WangZ.ZhangS.ChenY.ZhangZ.MaS. (2020). Covalent organic frameworks for separation applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.49, 708–735. 10.1039/c9cs00827f
55
WangZ. H.YangC.LiuT.QianH. L.YanX. P. (2023). Particle size regulation of single-crystalline covalent organic frameworks for high performance of gas chromatography. Anal. Chem.95, 8145–8149. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01550
56
XieM.QuanK.LiH.LiuB.ChenJ.YuY.et al (2023). Non-porous silica support covalent organic frameworks as stationary phases for liquid chromatography. Chem. Commun.59, 314–317. 10.1039/D2CC05650J
57
XuN. Y.GuoP.ChenJ. K.ZhangJ. H.WangB. J.XieS. M.et al (2021a). Chiral core-shell microspheres β-CD-COF@SiO2 used for HPLC enantioseparation. Talanta235, 122754. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122754
58
XuS.LiZ.ZhangL.ZhangW.LiD. (2021b). In situ growth of COF-rLZU1 on the surface of silica sphere as stationary phase for high performance liquid chromatography. Talanta221, 121612. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121612
59
YanY.-L.GuoD.WuJ.-L.TangX.-H.LuoJ.-J.LiS.-Q.et al (2022). Fabrication of cellulose derivative coated spherical covalent organic frameworks as chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation. J. Chromatogr. A1675, 463155. 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463155
60
YangC. X.LiuC.CaoY. M.YanX. P. (2015). Facile room-temperature solution-phase synthesis of a spherical covalent organic framework for high-resolution chromatographic separation. Chem. Commun.51, 12254–12257. 10.1039/c5cc03413b
61
YangY.PanH.LiX.LuoW.BhartiB. (2023). Applications of two-dimensional ion chromatography for analytes determination in environmental matrix: a review. J. Chromatogr. A1694, 463908. 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.463908
62
YinH.ZhenZ.NingW.ZhangL.XiangY.YeN. (2023). Three-dimensional fluorinated covalent organic frameworks coated capillary for the separation of fluoroquinolones by capillary electrochromatography. J. Chromatogr. A1706, 464234. 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464234
63
YuanC.JiaW.YuZ.LiY.ZiM.YuanL. M.et al (2022). Are highly stable covalent organic frameworks the key to universal chiral stationary phases for liquid and gas chromatographic separations?J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 891–900. 10.1021/jacs.1c11051
64
YuanC.WangZ.XiongW.HuangZ.LaiY.FuS.et al (2023). Cyclodextrin incorporation into covalent organic frameworks enables extensive liquid and gas chromatographic enantioseparations. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 18956–18967. 10.1021/jacs.3c05973
65
YueY.JiD.LiuY.WeiD. (2023). Chemical sensors based on covalent organic frameworks. Chem. – A Eur. J.30, e202302474. 10.1002/chem.202302474
66
YusufK.NatrajA.LiK.AteiaM.AlothmanZ. A.DichtelW. R. (2023). Inverse gas chromatography demonstrates the crystallinity-dependent physicochemical properties of two-dimensional covalent organic framework stationary phases. Chem. Mater.35, 1691–1701. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03448
67
ZhangJ.ChenJ.PengS.PengS.ZhangZ.TongY.et al (2019). Emerging porous materials in confined spaces: from chromatographic applications to flow chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev.48, 2566–2595. 10.1039/c8cs00657a
68
ZhangK.CaiS. L.YanY. L.HeZ. H.LinH. M.HuangX. L.et al (2017). Construction of a hydrazone-linked chiral covalent organic framework–silica composite as the stationary phase for high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A1519, 100–109. 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.09.007
69
ZhangS.ZhengY.AnH.AguilaB.YangC.DongY.et al (2018). Covalent organic frameworks with chirality enriched by biomolecules for efficient chiral separation. Angew. Chem.130, 16996–17001. 10.1002/ange.201810571
70
ZhengQ.HeY.MaW.WuY.ChenZ.WangR.et al (2021a). Facile synthesis of spherical covalent organic frameworks as stationary phases for short-column liquid chromatography. Chem. Commun.57, 7501–7504. 10.1039/d1cc03182a
71
ZhengQ.HuangJ.HeY.HuangH.JiY.ZhangY.et al (2022a). Single-crystalline covalent organic frameworks as high-performance liquid chromatographic stationary phases for positional isomer separation. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces14, 9754–9762. 10.1021/acsami.1c20989
72
ZhengQ.LiuJ.WuY.JiY.LinZ. (2022b). Fluoro-functionalized spherical covalent organic frameworks as a liquid chromatographic stationary phase for the high-resolution separation of organic halides. Anal. Chem.94, 18067–18073. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04592
73
ZhengY.WanM.ZhouJ.DaiX.YangH.XiaZ.et al (2022c). One-pot method for the synthesis of β-cyclodextrin and covalent organic framework functionalized chiral stationary phase with mixed-mode retention mechanism. J. Chromatogr. A1662, 462731. 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462731
74
ZhengY.WanM.ZhouJ.LuoQ.GaoD.FuQ.et al (2021b). Striped covalent organic frameworks modified stationary phase for mixed mode chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A1649, 462186. 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462186
75
ZongR.YinH.XiangY.ZhangL.YeN. (2022). Fluorinated covalent organic frameworks as a stationary phase for separation of fluoroquinolones by capillary electrochromatography. Microchim. Acta189, 237. 10.1007/s00604-022-05333-2
Summary
Keywords
COF, COF processability, COF composites, COF stationary phase, chromatography
Citation
Gavara R, Royuela S and Zamora F (2024) A minireview on covalent organic frameworks as stationary phases in chromatography. Front. Chem. 12:1384025. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1384025
Received
08 February 2024
Accepted
15 March 2024
Published
28 March 2024
Volume
12 - 2024
Edited by
Steve Suib, University of Connecticut, United States
Reviewed by
Briana Aguila-Ames, New College of Florida, United States
Bishnu P. Biswal, National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), India
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 Gavara, Royuela and Zamora.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Raquel Gavara, raquel.gavara@uam.es; Félix Zamora, felix.zamora@uam.es
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.