Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Chem.

Sec. Analytical Chemistry

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1594567

This article is part of the Research TopicRecent Advances in Pharmaceutical Analysis: Applications and New Challenges for the Quality of MedicinesView all 14 articles

Investigation of Illicit Pregabalin in Seized Samples from Saudi Arabia

Provisionally accepted
Fatimah M.  AlamriFatimah M. Alamri1Sultan K.  AlshammariSultan K. Alshammari2Monerah A.  AltamimyMonerah A. Altamimy2Ibrahim A.  Al OthaimIbrahim A. Al Othaim2Yahya  AlshehriYahya Alshehri2Fahad S.  AldawsariFahad S. Aldawsari2*Rayed M.  AlafraaRayed M. Alafraa3Ahmad D.  AlmalkiAhmad D. Almalki3Turki A.  AlkhalifaTurki A. Alkhalifa3Taher  SahlabjiTaher Sahlabji1Abubakr M.  IdrisAbubakr M. Idris1Haitham  Al-HamoudHaitham Al-Hamoud4Yahya F.  JamousYahya F. Jamous4
  • 1King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • 2Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 3Ministry of Interior (MOI), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 4King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Pregabalin (PGL) is a medication that is prescribed for controlling specific neurological-related symptoms. Due to its abuse in multiple countries, PGL has been classified as a controlled substance by authorities, including the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA).This study developed a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array detector (UPLC-PDA) method to quantify PGL in 40 seized samples (35 capsules, 5 powders).A complementary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used to detect potential adulterants. The UPLC-PDA method demonstrated linearity (r = 0.9973) for PGL quantification (0.50-3.00 mg/mL), with an accuracy of 96-102%. The RSD% values were 0.63% and 1.03% for intra-day and inter-day precision, respectively. Analysis of the five powder samples revealed a relative inconsistency in PGL content (107.91-114.55%).Moreover, it showed higher variability in PGL content (RSD 1.16-5.30%), suggesting possible adulteration or poor manufacturing. Furthermore, the results of the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) showed an acceptable purity for the powder samples. On the other hand, among 35 capsules, 5 (14.29%) exceeded pharmacopeial limits (95-105% PGL content), while 6 (17.14%) contained <95% PGL. These results demonstrate significant variability in PGL content and the presence of adulterants, underscoring the need for robust analytical methods in forensic chemistry. Furthermore, the LC-MS/MS method detected adulteration of PGL with codeine, paracetamol, and gabapentin in 2.9% of the analyzed capsules, suggesting custom mixing by perpetrators. In general, 31.43% of these samples failed to meet quality standards and contained substances beyond declared contents that posed toxicity risks, revealing inadequacies in illicit drug production and circulation. The UPLC-PDA method offers a rapid, validated approach for PGL quantification, while LC-MS/MS enhances adulterant detection, supporting forensic and quality control applications.

Keywords: pregabalin, forensic analysis, Abused drugs, seized samples, Counterfeit Drugs, Adulterants, Ultra-performance liquid chromatography, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Received: 16 Mar 2025; Accepted: 08 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Alamri, Alshammari, Altamimy, Al Othaim, Alshehri, Aldawsari, Alafraa, Almalki, Alkhalifa, Sahlabji, Idris, Al-Hamoud and Jamous. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Fahad S. Aldawsari, Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh, 13513, Saudi Arabia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.