EDITORIAL article

Front. Chem., 25 April 2025

Sec. Electrochemistry

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2025.1613443

Editorial: Defect chemistry in electrocatalysis - volume II

  • 1. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan, China

  • 2. College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (NJUPT), Nanjing, China

  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

  • 4. KAUST Catalysis Center (KCC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

The second volume of the Defect Chemistry in Electrocatalysis series continues to explore the vital role of defect engineering in advancing electrocatalytic technologies (). Electrocatalysis is essential to the operation of devices used for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Because the efficiency of these systems is heavily dependent on the kinetics of electrochemical reactions, developing high-performance electrocatalysts to accelerate these processes is crucial (). Since these reactions primarily take place at the catalyst surface, the surface electronic structure significantly influences the catalytic activity (). Defect engineering—through the intentional introduction of vacancies, dopants, or structural modifications—has emerged as a powerful strategy to tune catalyst behavior. By manipulating defects, researchers can enhance active site accessibility, modulate electronic structures, and improve reaction kinetics, ultimately boosting catalytic efficiency and selectivity (; ; ). In recent years, this area has witnessed rapid progress, with a surge of new research efforts emerging in response to the foundational studies presented in the previous Research Topic.

This Research Topic features recent advances that deepen our understanding of defect chemistry. Maseko et al. reveal that potassium and manganese co-promoters significantly enhance olefin selectivity in CoFe-ZSM-5 zeolites for CO2 hydrogenation, demonstrating the effectiveness of targeted metal modification in zeolite catalysts. Zhang et al. develop a nitrogen and boron dual-doped porous defect-rich carbon catalyst derived from saccharina japonica, achieving enhanced oxygen reduction activity. Their combined computational and experimental approach highlights the potential of biomass-based materials in sustainable electrocatalysis. Linling et al. review strategies for NO electroreduction to NH3, emphasizing the role of vacancy and doping defects in improving activity. Their work presents defect engineering as a viable strategy to achieve efficient electrocatalytic ammonia synthesis replacing the energy-intensive Haber-Bosch process. Chen et al. focus on the electrooxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, outlining how engineered anionic and cationic vacancies can accelerate reaction kinetics and improve catalyst performance for biomass valorization.

As guest editors, we extend our sincere gratitude to all the authors for their outstanding contributions, and to the reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. These contributions underscore the transformative impact of defect chemistry on electrocatalyst design. By elucidating the structure–performance relationship, this Research Topic advances the development of next-generation catalysts with greater efficiency, selectivity, and durability. Continued exploration in this field holds promise for breakthroughs in clean energy and environmental sustainability.

Statements

Author contributions

DY: Writing – original draft. LW: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. FZ: Writing – original draft. HH: Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Summary

Keywords

defect, electrocataiysis, energy storage and conversion, electrocatalysts, defect engineering

Citation

Yan D, Wang L, Zeng F and Huang H (2025) Editorial: Defect chemistry in electrocatalysis - volume II. Front. Chem. 13:1613443. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1613443

Received

17 April 2025

Accepted

17 April 2025

Published

25 April 2025

Volume

13 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Nosang Vincent Myung, University of Notre Dame, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Dafeng Yan, ; Longlu Wang, ; Feng Zeng, ; Huawei Huang,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics