Abstract
The growing global demand for clean and sustainable energy has intensified the development of novel technologies capable of harnessing naturally available resources. Among these, blue energy, referring to the power generated from the mixing of waters with different salinities, has emerged as a promising yet underutilized source. This perspective presents a comprehensive synthesis of recent advances in electrochemical harvesting systems, with a particular focus on Mixing Entropy Batteries (MEBs) as efficient, membrane-free devices for salinity gradient energy recovery. Unlike conventional approaches such as Reverse Electrodialysis (RED) and Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO), which depend heavily on ion-exchange membranes and complex infrastructure, MEBs offer simplified and scalable architecture suitable for harsh environments and industrial effluents. The use of LiCl-based electrolytes enables significant blue energy recovery, achieving energy densities of 38.2 mJ/cm2 and power densities of 13.8 μW/cm2, with excellent cycling stability. This system leverages the high solubility of LiCl (832 g/L) to create steep salinity gradients, utilizing LiFePO4/FePO4 as the cathode and Ag/AgCl as the anode, with no observable performance degradation over 100 cycles. This work analyzes alternative electrode materials, including Prussian Blue analogues (copper hexacyanoferrate CuHCF), MnO2, BiOCl, and polypyrrole, and explores their integration with unconventional water sources such as industrial brines, hypersaline reject streams, and treated wastewater, particularly within the resource-constrained context of the Atacama Desert. This manuscript consolidates experimental data, device designs, and comparative performance metrics, providing a critical framework for advancing blue energy technologies. It also underscores their potential role in circular economy models and off-grid renewable energy systems solutions.
1 Introduction
Chile, particularly its northern macrozone, offers a highly favorable scenario for the deployment of salinity gradient energy technologies, due to its unique geographic, industrial, and hydrological characteristics. The Atacama Desert is the site of significant brine extraction activities, which generate large volumes of concentrated liquid waste, particularly rich in lithium. By combining these residual brines with other water sources, such as seawater, desalination plant wastewater, or municipal wastewater, it is possible to obtain media with salinity gradients suitable for energy recovery applications (Cabello, 2021; Fitzsimons and Warren, 2024; He et al., 2024; Kidder et al., 2020; Lagos et al., 2024; Marinova et al., 2025). These contrasting water streams establish naturally available, high-enthalpy salinity gradients that are ideal for electrochemical energy harvesting, particularly via Mixing Entropy Battery (MEB) technology. Compared to other technologies such as (i) electrodialysis (RED) (Ahualli et al., 2014; Brogioli, 2009; Jia et al., 2013; Jia et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2016a; Kim et al., 2016b; La Mantia et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2017; Logan and Elimelech, 2012; Logan and Elimelech, 2012; Marino et al., 2014; Md Hasan et al., 2017), (ii) Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) (Ahualli et al., 2014; Bag, 2017; Haj Mohammad Hosein Tehrani et al., 2015; Jia et al., 2014a; Ye et al., 2014), (iii) semipermeable membranes (Brogioli, 2009; Brogioli et al., 2012; La Mantia et al., 2011), (iv) selective ion membranes (Bag, 2017; Brogioli, 2009; La Mantia et al., 2011) and (v) concentration cells (Bag, 2017; Brogioli, 2009; Jia et al., 2013; La Mantia et al., 2011), MEBs offer a simpler system capable of operating efficiently in high-saline environments. The exponential increase in global energy demand, along with the detrimental environmental impact caused by fossil fuel consumption, has necessitated the exploration of sustainable alternatives derived from abundant natural resources. This change has redirected attention away from petroleum-based fuels toward cleaner and renewable energy sources. Among the most successful alternatives to date are solar, wind and geothermal energy (Chang et al., 2023; Gómez et al., 2025; Osorio-Aravena et al., 2021; Osorio-Aravena et al., 2025; Oyarzún-Aravena et al., 2025; Véliz et al., 2025). However, the vast expanse of the ocean remains an underexploited and inexhaustible reservoir of renewable energy, which is a relevant opportunity for Chile, given its extensive Pacific coastline that spans the entire length of the country. Marine energy sources, including waves, tides, ocean currents, offshore winds, thermal gradients, and salinity concentration differences, have emerged promising avenues for sustainable energy generation (Marino et al., 2015). In particular, the chemical energy released during the natural mixing of freshwater and seawater at estuarine interfaces, commonly referred as blue energy or salinity gradient energy (Lee et al., 2017; Marino et al., 2014), presents a unique opportunity for electricity generation. This entropic energy release, which occurs when river water meets seawater flow, is estimated to yield up to 2.2 kJ of free energy per liter of freshwater (Brogioli, 2009; Brogioli et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2016a; Kim et al., 2016b; La Mantia et al., 2011; Marino et al., 2015; Md Hasan et al., 2017; Morais et al., 2016). Despite the potential application of MEBs, the use of the hypersaline electrolytes from Atacama Desert and their associated corrosion challenges remain poorly studied.
In 1954, Pattle was the first to propose the generation of renewable energy through the mixing using of freshwater with water of higher ionic concentration, introducing it as an alternative to generate clean energy (Pattle, 1954; Fernández et al., 2015). Later, in 1976, Bert H. Clampitt et al. proposed an electrochemical cell that could recover energy using the concept of mixing waters of different concentrations, as river water and seawater (Clampitt and Kiviat, et al., 1976). In 2009, Brogioli (2009) explained a new and interesting technique of obtaining blue energy under the electrochemistry concept called CAPMIX (Brogioli et al., 2012; Fernández et al., 2015; Gomes et al., 2015; Haj Mohammad Hosein Tehrani et al., 2015; Iglesias et al., 2014; Jia et al., 2013; Jia et al., 2014a; Lee et al., 2017; Marino et al., 2014; Marino et al., 2016; Ye et al., 2014), based on the storage of Na+ and Cl− ion inside activated carbon electrodes (Brogioli, 2009; Brogioli et al., 2012; Fernández et al., 2015; Iglesias et al., 2014; Jia et al., 2014a; Lima et al., 2017; Marino et al., 2015; Marino et al., 2016). This technology has technical disadvantages due to problems to sensitivity to impurities such as dissolved oxygen during the mixing solutions (La Mantia et al., 2011; Salerno et al., 2013). These impurities generate uncontrolled discharges (Brogioli, 2009; La Mantia et al., 2011; Marino et al., 2016) which makes entropic energy production inefficient. In 2011, Fabio La Mantia et al. (La Mantia et al., 2011) proposed a revolutionary system, obtaining called Mixing Entropy Battery (MEB). This technology generated expectations and advanced the technology by working similarly to Brogioli device, utilizing the mixture of two solutions with varying salinity concentrations. The MEB functions as a reversible electrochemical system, causing electroactive ions in the solution with high ionic strength to be stored pseudo-capacitively into the crystalline structure of the cathode and anode materials, respectively (Ali et al., 2025; Du et al., 2025; Li et al., 2025a; Li et al., 2025b; Wang et al., 2025b). The CAPMIX and MEB signify significant strides in energy storage technology. This manuscript compiles relevant information on various electroactive materials that employ the technology and concept of electrochemical ion pumping method for blue energy recovery, with a particular focus on their potential application in the Atacama Desert, Chile.
2 Opportunity of Chile for blue energy recovery
La Mantia reported a significant advancement in blue energy using LiCl as the electrolyte, which is an approach particularly relevant to lithium-rich brines from the Atacama Desert. The alternative electrochemical system operates based on the reversible reaction FePO4 + Ag+ + LiCl ⇌ LiFePO4 + AgCl. In this configuration, the LiFePO4/FePO4 was employed as cathodic electrode (facilitating lithium-ion intercalation), while the Ag/AgCl was employed as anodic electrode (enabling chloride ion capture). Lithium chloride (LiCl), which is highly soluble in water (832 g/L), enables the generation of steep salinity gradients favorable for efficient energy extraction. To simulate freshwater and seawater conditions, LiCl concentrations of 0.03 and 1.5 M were employed, respectively. The system achieved an energy density of 38.2 mJ/cm2 and a power density of 13.8 μW/cm2, slightly surpassing the performance of the NaCl/Na2Mn5O10 system. Furthermore, it demonstrated excellent cycling stability over 100 cycles, with no observable decline in energy output. The cell voltage remained stable throughout operation, attributed to the two-phase nature of the LiFePO4/FePO4 electrode pair (La Mantia et al., 2011). Northern Chile offers a unique combination of environmental and industrial conditions that position it as a prime candidate for the deployment of salinity gradient energy recovery technologies using the saline waters present in the Atacama Desert. The region is characterized by substantial volumes of high-salinity effluents generated by industrial activities, such as lithium brine obtained via evaporation of naturally well-brine (Foo and Lienhard, 2025; Gutiérrez and Ruiz-León, 2024; He et al., 2024; Marinova et al., 2025). These concentrated streams abruptly contrast sharply with low-salinity sources such as municipal wastewater (Furness et al., 2024; Phuc-Hanh Tran et al., 2024; Sampedro et al., 2024; Soo et al., 2024; Zhan et al., 2025), creating favorable salinity gradients that are ideal for blue energy recovery through electrochemical technologies. A promising opportunity lies along the coastal interface of the Atacama Desert, where treated effluents from desalination plants or municipal wastewater facilities (de Lima et al., 2025; Giacalone et al., 2024) can be mixed with hypersaline residual brines from industries as SQM, Albemarle, or future operations by Codelco, forming a gradient with entropic potential exceeding that of natural seawater/river water systems (Cabello, 2021; Lagos et al., 2024; Marinova et al., 2025). From a technological perspective, Chile’s lithium-rich brines are compatible with Li-selective cathodes such as LiFePO4, enabling dual functionalities: (i) energy extraction, and (ii) lithium pre-concentration and recovery (Liu et al., 2025; Lv et al., 2025; Ou et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2025). Similarly, CuHCF materials could be synthetized using low-cost, locally available precursors derived from salts such as NaNO3, KNO3, NaCl, KCl, CuSO4, among other located in the Atacama Desert from Lithium and fertilizer industries. Furthermore, the Atacama Desert’s exceptionally high solar irradiance (exceeding 3,000 kWh/m2 year) (Bayo-Besteiro et al., 2023; Luccini et al., 2016; Marzo et al., 2018; Soler et al., 2025) enables the integration of solar thermal systems for water recovery via solar distillation, solar concentration or photovoltaic-powered brine reuse, creating a hybrid solar-blue energy loop with net-zero emissions.
3 Materials for blue energy recovery
Research into blue energy has traditionally focused on the mixing of seawater and freshwater. However, alternative sources, such as highland brines, municipal wastewater, or reject saline solutions from reverse osmosis plants, are gaining high interest as viable salinity gradient media. The use of commercial cathode materials commonly employed in lithium-ion batteries allows for the reversible intercalation of Na+ or Li+ ions, enabling Faradaic reactions driven by salinity gradients (Altiok et al., 2023; Gaber et al., 2025; Galleguillos et al., 2020; Galleguillos-Madrid et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2022; Mojid et al., 2024; Salazar-Avalos et al., 2023; Suu et al., 2025).
Despite their high energy efficiency, the use of silver (Ag) as an anode is limited due to its high cost and strong thermodynamic susceptibility to form AgCl layers in chloride-containing media (Chauhan et al., 2025; De Silva et al., 2011; Vvedenskii et al., 2007), as well as its tendency to form complexes with ions such as NH4+ and CO32- (Cho et al., 2022; Jin et al., 2003; Pargar et al., 2018; Popović et al., 2023). In a simulated NaCl gradient (0.6 vs. 0.024 M NaCl), energy recovery values of up to 29 mJ/cm2 have been reported with 75% efficiency, while under a LiCl gradient (1.5 vs. 0.03 M LiCl), recoveries of 38.2 mJ/cm2 have been achieved over 100 cycles (La Mantia et al., 2011). Jia et al. (2015) presented a system using CuHCF as the anode and Ag as the cathode, demonstrating reversible Na+ intercalation/deintercalation within the CuHCF crystal structure. Kasiri et al. (2019) proposed the use of CuZnHCF mixture as a cathode material in aqueous zinc-ion batteries, achieving capacity retention of 85.54% at 1C after 1,000 cycles. Similarly, Haj Mohammad Hosein Tehrani et al. (2015) utilized CoHCF as the cathode, observing two redox peaks associated with the Fe2+/Fe3+ coupled and Na+ ion transport, and achieving an energy recovery of up to 24,000 μW/g. In a related study, Lu et al. (2016) evaluated the use of CoHCF as a cathode in sodium-based energy conversion systems, showing excellent capacitance and high specific energy of 54.4 Wh/kg. Kim et al., (2016a) proposed the use of NH4HCO3 as a low-temperature dissociable salt, allowing the operation of hybrid electrochemical cells that integrate thermal distillation. In this configuration, MnO2 showed stability in the presence of NH4+, while PbO and PbO2 were evaluated as anodic electrode in CO32- containing electrolytes, however, the formation of PbCO3 on PbO surfaces limits efficiency during the operation. The Hybrid CapMix concept, introduced by Lee et al. (2017), combines a Faradaic cathode (sodium manganese oxide, NMO) with an activated carbon as anode, and an anion exchange membrane, achieving a power density of 97 mW/m2. Likewise, Kim et al. (2016b) demonstrated the viability of using non-selective membranes as low-cost alternatives to ion-exchange membranes, producing stable power outputs of 411 mW/m2 over 20 cycles. Ye et al. (2019) proposed a MEB using Prussian Blue (PB) and Polypyrrole (PPy), both low-cost materials. The device exhibited nearly 100% Coulombic efficiency and stable operation over 50 cycles, demonstrating the feasibility of energy-free operation. Tan and Zhu (2020) introduced BiOCl as a cost-effective alternative to Ag, achieving power densities up to 87 mW/m2 with the aid of polyelectrolyte coatings. The system exhibited good stability in hypersaline waters (300 g/L NaCl), offering results comparable to or exceeding those of AgCl-based systems. Nevertheless, the use of Ag remains problematic due to partial dissolution in real-world environments, with detected concentrations exceeding EPA limits after several cycles (Ye et al., 2014). Therefore, the development of sustainable materials such as PPy or BiOCl, are essential for the scalable deploying of this technology.
4 Discussion and outlooks
Currently, several techniques are available to recover chemical energy from the salinity gradient between two solutions, including reverse electrodialysis (RED) (Ahualli et al., 2014; Brogioli, 2009; Jia et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2016a; Kim et al., 2016b; La Mantia et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2017; Logan and Elimelech, 2012; Marino et al., 2014; Md Hasan et al., 2017), Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) (Ahualli et al., 2014; Bag, 2017; Haj Mohammad Hosein Tehrani et al., 2015; Jia et al., 2014b; Ye et al., 2014), semipermeable membranes (Brogioli, 2009; Brogioli et al., 2012; La Mantia et al., 2011), selective ion membranes (Bag, 2017; Brogioli, 2009; La Mantia et al., 2011), and concentration cells (Bag, 2017; Brogioli, 2009; Jia et al., 2013; La Mantia et al., 2011). All these technologies have undergone significant technological advancements in recent years. RED systems, which operate using ion-exchange membranes, typically achieve power densities in the range of 1–2 W/m2 and perform more efficiently under low salinity gradients. This technology can be integrated to other processes, such as reverse osmosis; however, the cost associated with building, operation and membrane replacement can be limitations to widespread adoption. In contrast, PRO is better suited for high salinity gradients but requires high-pressure-resistant membranes and complex infrastructure. This technology commonly achieves power densities around of 5–7 W/m2 using seawater/wastewater, and 27 W/m2 using 1 M NaCl with distilled water (Wan and Chung, 2015). Mixing Entropy Batteries (MEBs), however, operate without membranes or rely on simple separators, enabling energy recovery from highly concentrated brines while significantly reducing system complexity. Although current MEBs yield lower power densities (typically between 10 and 100 mW/m2), they offer substantial advantages and versatility in terms of electrode material, modular design, and compatibility with industrial effluents, features particularly beneficial in resource-limited or remote regions such as the Atacama Desert. Furthermore, both RED and PRO are heavily reliant on membranes, for which sustainable recycling or circular economy strategies are not yet widely implemented. In contrast, MEBs adopt a membrane-free concept that facilitates direct electrochemical energy recovery during the mixing of waters with differing salinity.
The strategic convergence of industrial activity, geographical conditions, and saline water resource dynamics in Chile, especially in the Atacama Desert, creates a favorable environment for the development of salinity gradient energy recovery technologies. Brine mining operations not only generate massive quantities of high-salinity effluents, especially lithium-rich brines, but are also complemented by the availability of desalinated seawater and municipal wastewater to meet operational demands in regions of high solar irradiance (Ali Chang et al., 2024; de Lima et al., 2025). These diverse water sources naturally create sharp ionic gradients, which can be connected for blue energy generation using electrochemical technologies such as Mixing Entropy Batteries (MEBs) or hybrid CapMix systems (Cheng et al., 2025; El Moutchou et al., 2024). Chile presents a scenario of high-enthalpy salinity gradients. Industrial brines in northern Chile often exceed 200–300 g/L NaCl (Bonelli and Pavez, 2025; He et al., 2024). Additionally, Chile’s mining sector directly contributes the advancement of blue energy systems. For example, lithium-rich brines match well with Li-selective cathodes like LiFePO4 or NiHCF (Goel et al., 2025; Wei et al., 2025; Xu et al., 2023), enabling simultaneous energy harvesting and lithium pre-concentration. Similarly, materials such as CuHCF and PPy, which are promising candidates for cathode and anode materials, could be synthesized from local resources such as NaNO3 or KNO3 from SQM’s operations. This presents a novel opportunity to deploy emerging technologies that can contribute power generation in hard-to-reach regions such as the Chilean Altiplano. From a technological perspective, a wide range of materials have been evaluated for their suitability in electrochemical systems exploiting salinity gradients. Cathodes, such as NMO and lithium-iron phosphate (LFP), enable Faradaic ion intercalation reactions with Na+ and Li+, respectively, offering high specific capacities and stability. However, the widespread use of silver (Ag) as an anode raises sustainability concerns due to its cost and solubility issues in high-chloride environments, resulting in the formation of AgCl or complex ions that impair system efficiency (Man et al., 2025; Suu et al., 2025; Yim et al., 2025).
The experimental performance of MEBs has been validated through various configurations reported in the literature, as summarized in Table 1. These systems demonstrate successful operation under laboratory conditions simulating real-world salinity gradients. For example, the Na2Mn5O10–Ag and LiFePO4–Ag configurations (La Mantia et al., 2011) achieved energy recovery values of 10.5 and 13.8 μW/cm2, respectively, under synthetic gradients (0.6 vs. 0.024–0.03 M NaCl or LiCl) with stable cycling over 100 cycles. Other systems, such as Na4Mn9O18–Ag (Jia et al., 2014a; Jia et al., 2014b) and CoHCF–Ag (Kiviat, 1976) have reported power densities of up to 0.65 kW/m3 and 24 mW/g1, respectively, confirming their electrochemical reversibility and robustness. Additionally, Faradaic systems based on CuHCF or BiOCl (Logan and Elimelech, 2012; Ye et al., 2019) have demonstrated acceptable energy recovery ranging from 10 to 411 mW/m2, even in configurations with minimal electrode areas or simplified geometries. Collectively, these findings provide a solid experimental foundation for the viability of MEBs and support the conceptual projections outlined in this work. While laboratory results are promising, long-term stability of electrode materials under real brine conditions remains a key challenge for scale-up. Several anodes reported in the literature, such as silver (Ag), are prone to degradation due to chloride-induced reaction (AgCl layer formation), particularly in high-chloride industrial brines. This issue is evident in multiple studies (Fernández et al., 2015; La Mantia et al., 2011; Ye et al., 2014), where Ag is used despite its known environmental risks and tendency to dissolution under prolonged cycling. Alternative anodes such as BiOCl and PPy have emerged as promising substitutes due to their chemical stability and lower environmental impact (Marino et al., 2016; Ye et al., 2019). On the cathodic side, materials like LiFePO4, Na2Mn5O10, and CuHCF have demonstrated high reversibility; however, their performance can be influenced by pH, ionic composition, and the presence of complexing agents such as NH4+ or CO32-. Additionally, the pond of standardized water pre-treatment protocols introduces uncertainty in systems that rely on municipal wastewater or desalination brines. Membrane-based systems such as hybrid CapMix, PRO or RED are further limited by membrane fouling and degradation under hypersaline and organic-rich conditions issues that remain unresolved in the absence of recycling strategies or circular economy models.
TABLE 1
| Ref | Cathodic material | Anodic material | Electrode area (cm2) | Thickness electrode (mm) | MEB volume (cm3) | Electrode spacing (mm) | Potential range (V) | Current range (mA/cm2) | High concentration solution (M) | Low concentration solution (M) | Cycles No |
Recovery potential (V) | Efficiency (%) | Recovered energy W/m2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Mantia et al. (2011) | Na2Mn5O10 | Ag | 2 | — | 0.35 | 10 | — | 0.25 | 0.6 | 0.024 | 100 | 0.135 | 75 | 0.105 |
| La Mantia et al. (2011) | LiFePO4 | Ag | 2 | — | 0.35 | 10 | — | — | 1.5 | 0.030 | 100 | — | — | 0.138 |
| Md Hasan et al. (2017) | Na2Mn5O10 | Ag | 2 | — | 0.30 | 1 | 0–0.65 | 0.50 | 0.6 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Ye et al. (2014) | Zn | Ag | 1 | 0.1 | — | 0.6 | 0.8–1 | 0.50 | 4.5% | 0.68 | — | 0.160 | 80 | 1.6 |
| Marino et al. (2016) | NiHCF | Ppy/Ag | 1 | — | — | — | 0–0.8 | 0.01 | 3 | 0.020 | 100 | — | — | — |
| Salerno et al. (2013) | Na2Mn5O10 | AC | 3.01 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 0–0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.01 | 3 | 0.150 | — | 0.097 |
| Trocoli et al. (2016) | MnO2 | Pb | 7 | 0.2 | 14.1 | — | 0.1–0.8 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.020 | — | 0.100 | — | 0.0063 |
| Logan and Elimelech (2012) | Ag | CuHCF | 5 | — | — | 3 | 0.2–1.2 | 0.50 | 0.6 | 0.024 | 25 | 0.102 | 69 | 17.95 |
| Jia et al. (2014a) | Na4Mn9O18 | Ag | 9 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.7 | — | 0.25 | 0.6 | 0.032 | 12 | — | 68 | 650 |
| Fernández et al. (2015) | Na2Mn5O10 | Ag | 1 | 0.05 | — | 0.6 | — | — | 0.5 | 0.020 | — | — | — | 0.015 |
| Kiviat (1976) | CoHCF | Ag | 1.3 | — | — | 1 | 0–1.1 | 0.01 | 0.6 | 0.024 | 30 | 0.153 | 65 | — |
| Pasta et al. (2012) | CuHCF | CuHCF | 3 | 0.12 | 1.2 | 0.4 | — | 0.5 | 0.513 | 0.017 | 20 | 0.172 | — | 0.411 |
| Ye et al. (2019) | FeHCF | PPy | — | — | — | — | 0–0.3 | — | 0.6 | 0.024 | 50 | 0.3 | — | — |
| Tan and Zhu (2020) | CuHCF | BiOCl | — | — | — | — | 0.5 | 0.2 | 5.14 | 0.017 | — | — | — | 0.010 |
| Smolinska-Kempisty et al. (2020) | C | C | 0.2 | 0.2 | — | — | 0.2 | 1,380 | 1.71 | 0.069 | 10 | — | 86.3 | 0.017 |
| Nasir et al. (2020) | C | C | 9 | 4.5 | — | 1 | 0.6 | — | 0.5 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.6 | — | — |
| Li et al. (2023) | MoS2 | C | 1 | — | — | — | 0.4 | 5 | 0.086 | — | 100 | — | 82.2 | 0.00612 |
Characteristics of the mixing entropic batteries–design and operations conditions described in the literature.
[a] NaCl concentrated solution resistance: 5 Ω, resistance of NaCl diluted solution: 75 Ω [b] LiCl concentrated solution resistance: 5.4 Ω, resistance of the diluted LiCl solution: 10.6 Ω, [c] Load capacity of Na2Mn5Or10 is 35 mAh/g, [d] NaCl concentrated solution resistivity: 0.1 Ωm, NaCl diluted solution resistivity: 1.3 Ωm and a solution feed flow of 5 mL/s, [e] NaCl concentrated solution resistance: 3 Ω, resistance of NaCl diluted solution: 17 Ω and load capacity for Na2Mn5O10 material of 35 mAh/g, [f] 0.5 mL/s, [g] The energy obtained is based to each kJ/mol of Na+ electro inserted into each charge and discharge cycle, [h] The MEB prototype used considers a cation exchange membrane, [i] Resistance of NaCl concentrated solution: 0.3 Ω, resistance of NaCl diluted solution: 5.6 Ω, membrane resistance: 1.0 Ω, solution feed flow: 7.5 mL/min, [j] Activated carbon (AC), anionic exchange membrane with an area of 3.01 cm2, solution feed flow: 20 mL/min.
MEBs offer a membrane-free or minimal-membrane alternative, thereby reducing maintenance burdens and reducing the need for intensive chemical conditioning. However, ensuring stable performance in real effluents streams will require the development of tailored pre-treatment strategies, such as particulate filtration, anti-scalants, or ultraviolet (UV) disinfection, depending on the specific characteristics of the water source. Consequently, further pilot-scale studies are essential to evaluate fouling resistance, redox stability, and long-term durability of MEB electrodes operating in complex saline matrices.
Research has shown that Ag concentrations in treated water can exceed regulatory limits, such as those set by the US EPA, after multiple-discharge cycles (Cervantes-Avilés et al., 2019; Shafer et al., 1998; Wimmer et al., 2019). As a sustainable alternative, BiOCl has demonstrated energy densities comparable to Ag-based systems, reaching up to 87 mW/m2 when enhanced with polyelectrolyte coatings (Dhanasekaran et al., 2025; Reale et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2022). Similarly, PPy as a conducting polymer, exhibits robust performance, broad potential windows, and low energy input requirements, making it well-suited for the selective capture of anions such as Cl−. Transition metal oxides like MnO2 also show high redox stability, particularly in systems utilizing ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3) as a regenerative salt for thermal-electrochemical hybrid configurations (Chen et al., 2025; Jabarullakhan and Kandasamy, 2025; Meng et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2025a). Moreover, research on hybrid CapMix systems has demonstrated promising performance under real-world conditions. These devices, that combine capacitive and Faradaic charge storage strategies, have achieved energy recoveries values approaching 100 mW/m2 under moderate salinity gradients. Notably, Lee et al. (2017) reported a hybrid device based on NMO and activated carbon that exemplifies this synergistic behavior. Additionally, the use of non-selective membranes in place of costly ion-exchange membranes, as demonstrated by Kim et al. (2016a) and Kim et al. (2016b), provides a practical path for large-scale implementation.
Importantly, Chile’s exceptionally high solar irradiance, surpassing 3,000 kWh/m2·year in regions like the Atacama Desert (Luccini et al., 2016; Marzo et al., 2018; Naranjo et al., 2025; Rodríguez-Córdova et al., 2025), offers a strategic advantage for the integration of solar-driven or hybrid energy systems. Looking forward, the implementation of blue energy in Chile can help address several national priorities: (i) diversifying the energy matrix, (ii) valorizing industrial waste streams, and (iii) decarbonizing energy-intensive sectors. By leveraging its lithium and copper resources not only for global battery markets but also for electrochemical blue energy systems, Chile has the potential to pioneer integrated circular economy models that promote clean energy innovation. However, the long-term performance and fouling resistance of electrode materials under real industrial brine conditions must be rigorously evaluated (Arif et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2014; Yangyang Wang, 2022; Yue et al., 2025). Issues such as membrane degradation, ionic selectivity, and cycling efficiency under complex effluent compositions also remain unresolved and demand further study. Furthermore, techno-economic analyses that incorporate site-specific variables, including local flow rates of waters, salinity profiles, and capital and operational expenditures, are essentials to determinate the scalability and investment feasibility of proposed systems.
The exploration of blue energy as a viable alternative to conventional renewables marks a pivotal step toward the global pursuit of sustainable and resilient energy systems. Among the most promising approaches, electrochemical methods for harvesting entropic energy at the interface of fluids with differing salinities, whether natural or anthropogenic origin, have demonstrated robustness and adaptability. In this context, Chile is uniquely positioned to pioneer the industrial-scale implementation and development of blue energy systems. Its northern macrozone, with high lithium and copper resources, abundant access to high-salinity industrial brines, and desalinated or treated water, offers an exceptional salinity gradient that can exceed even that found at natural seawater-river water interfaces. These conditions not only enable efficient blue energy generation with high efficiency but also create opportunities to value critical mineral residues and close the loop on water-energy nexus challenges. On the other hand, the use and deployment of low-cost and sustainable electrodes such as BiOCl, MnO2, CuHCF, or Polypyrrole (PPy), alongside innovative configurations that integrate Faradaic and capacitive charge storage, has enabled stable and scalable energy recovery across a broad range of saline mixtures. Importantly, many of these materials are increasingly compatible with local Chilean resources, particularly lithium-rich brines, offering new avenues for national innovation and industrial cooperation. Moreover, coupling blue energy technologies with Chile’s exceptional solar potential opens the door to hybrid systems in which solar heat is used for distillation or concentration of saline solutions, enhancing system autonomy and net energy yield with zero emissions. Ultimately, blue energy stands as a promising technology for diversifying renewable energy sources. Its capacity to extract chemical energy from water salinity gradients, even under extreme salinity conditions, provides a solid scientific and technological foundation for large-scale deployment. Moving forward, coordinated efforts between academia, industry, and government will be essential to transition from laboratory-scale demonstrations to commercially viable, field-ready solutions. Such collaborations will ensure that blue energy not only contributes to mitigating climate change but also fosters innovation, water circularity, and sustainable development of clean energy.
The implementation of blue energy in Chile holds transformative impact across industrial, economic, social, and environmental dimensions. At the industrial scale, this technology represents a critical step toward the decarbonization of key processes, enabling a more diversified and resilient energy matrix while significantly reducing dependence on fossil fuels. These advances will enhance national energy security and contribute to a substantial reduction in our carbon footprint. For small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), the development of blue energy opens new market opportunities in the design, manufacture, installation, and maintenance of MEB systems. These ecosystems will foster the growth of specialized technical skills, facilitate knowledge transfer, and generate a wide range of skilled employment opportunities, simulation local economies and promoting technological sovereignty. Socially, blue energy offers a unique opportunity to improve the lives of remote communities in regions such as the Atacama Desert, where access to reliable electricity remains a challenge. By utilizing locally available water resources, blue energy systems can support models of regional energy autonomy, enhancing living conditions, and advance sustainable rural development. Strategically, this initiative positions Chile as a frontrunner in global energy innovation. In doing so, Chile reinforces its leadership in the global energy transition, advancing both environmental and economic competitiveness.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because there is no new data. The article considers previously published articles. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to Felipe Galleguillos/felipe.galleguillos.madrid@uantof.cl.
Author contributions
FG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SS-A: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. MB: Investigation, Writing – original draft. JQ: Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. NT: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. GC-Y: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. AS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Programa de Doctorado en Energía Solar of the Universidad de Antofagasta, Chile, for its academic guidance, training and institutional support. The authors are also grateful to ANID-Chile through the research projects FONDECYT Iniciación 11230550 and 11241236, and ANID/FONDAP 1522A0006 Solar Energy Research Center SERC-Chile, for providing scientific collaboration opportunities, technical advice, and access to research infrastructure. The contributions were essentials in facilitating the development of this work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Ahualli S. Jiménez M. L. Fernández M. M. Iglesias G. Brogioli D. Delgado V. (2014). Polyelectrolyte-coated carbons used in the generation of blue energy from salinity differences. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 25241–25246. 10.1039/c4cp03527e
2
Ali Chang S. Balouch A. Abdullah (2024). Analytical perspective of lithium extraction from brine waste: analysis and current progress. Microchem. J.200, 110291. 10.1016/j.microc.2024.110291
3
Ali M. Saleem M. Sattar T. Khan M. Z. Koh J. H. Gohar O. et al (2025). High-entropy battery materials: revolutionizing energy storage with structural complexity and entropy-driven stabilization. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep.163, 100921. 10.1016/j.mser.2024.100921
4
Altiok E. Kaya T. Z. Smolinska-Kempisty K. Güler E. Kabay N. Tomaszewska B. et al (2023). Salinity gradient energy conversion by custom-made interpolymer ion exchange membranes utilized in reverse electrodialysis system. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.11, 109386. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109386
5
Arif M. Jones F. Barifcani A. Iglauer S. (2017). Electrochemical investigation of the effect of temperature, salinity and salt type on brine/mineral interfacial properties. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control59, 136–147. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.02.013
6
Bag A. (2017). Electrochemical cell equipment for salinity gradient power generation. Asian J. Phys. Chem. Sci.3, 1–10. 10.9734/ajopacs/2017/35103
7
Bayo-Besteiro S. de la Torre L. Costoya X. Gómez-Gesteira M. Pérez-Alarcón A. deCastro M. et al (2023). Photovoltaic power resource at the atacama desert under climate change. Renew. Energy216, 118999. 10.1016/j.renene.2023.118999
8
Bonelli C. Pavez A. (2025). White mining’s green dream: entropy and the mirage of sustainability in Northern Chile. Extr. Industries Soc.23, 101683. 10.1016/j.exis.2025.101683
9
Brogioli D. (2009). Extracting renewable energy from a salinity difference using a capacitor. Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 058501. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.058501
10
Brogioli D. Ziano R. Rica R. A. Salerno D. Kozynchenko O. Hamelers H. V. M. et al (2012). Exploiting the spontaneous potential of the electrodes used in the capacitive mixing technique for the extraction of energy from salinity difference. Energy Environ. Sci.5, 9870–9880. 10.1039/c2ee23036d
11
Cabello J. (2021). Lithium brine production, reserves, resources and exploration in Chile: an updated review. Ore Geol. Rev.128, 103883. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103883
12
Cervantes-Avilés P. Huang Y. Keller A. A. (2019). Incidence and persistence of silver nanoparticles throughout the wastewater treatment process. Water Res.156, 188–198. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.031
13
Chang M. Paardekooper S. Prina M. G. Thellufsen J. Z. Lund H. Lapuente P. (2023). Smart energy approaches for carbon abatement: scenario designs for Chile’s energy transition. Smart Energy10, 100098. 10.1016/j.segy.2023.100098
14
Chauhan B. Singh A. D. Sengupta S. Nadakuduru V. N. Mundotiya B. M. (2025). Corrosion behavior of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni-Ag alloy coatings on Cu-substrate: the effect of the Ag content. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem Eng. Asp.722, 137323. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.137323
15
Chen M. Huang X. Zhong Z. Wang P. (2025). MnO2·MnO nanocrystalline as a highly efficient cooperative catalyst for formaldehyde oxidation. Appl. Surf. Sci.705, 163530. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.163530
16
Cheng L. Luo Y. Wang H. Zhou Z. Yang M. Li C. et al (2025). Optimized synthesis and electrochemical behaviors of Prussian blue analogues cathodes for potassium-ion batteries. Mater. Rep. Energy5, 100331. 10.1016/j.matre.2025.100331
17
Cho K. R. Kim M. Kim B. Shin G. Lee S. Kim W. (2022). Investigation of the AgCl formation mechanism on the Ag wire surface for the fabrication of a marine low-frequency-electric-field-detection Ag/AgCl sensor electrode. ACS Omega7, 25110–25121. 10.1021/acsomega.2c01481
18
Clampitt B. H. Kiviat F. E. (1976). Energy recovery from saline water by means of electrochemical cells. Sci. New Ser.194, 719–720.
19
de Lima J. P. M. Amaral M. C. S. de Lima S. C. R. B. (2025). Sustainable water management in the mining industry: paving the way for the future. J. Water Process Eng.71, 107239. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107239
20
De Silva K. C. R. Kaseman B. J. Bayless D. J. (2011). Silver (Ag) as anode and cathode current collectors in high temperature planar solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy36, 779–786. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.10.034
21
Dhanasekaran T. Jayathuna M. A. Manigandan R. Negishi Y. (2025). Ag-Embedded hollow Poly(o-phenylenediamine)-reinforced NiOOH-BiOCl hybrid-structured nanomaterials for highly sensitive dual electrocatalysis. Langmuir41, 12403–12413. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04003
22
Du X. Zhang Z. Sun C. Zhen M. Hu Z. Liu H. (2025). High-entropy materials for high-performance rechargeable batteries: concepts, synthesis, and development. J. Alloys Compd.1036, 181806. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.181806
23
El Moutchou S. Sabi N. Oueldna N. Trabadelo V. Aziam H. Ben Youcef H. (2024). High-entropy cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries: correlating synthesis, crystal structure and electrochemical properties. J. Energy Storage98, 113078. 10.1016/j.est.2024.113078
24
Fernández M. M. Ahualli S. Iglesias G. R. González-Caballero F. Delgado Á. V. Jiménez M. L. (2015). Multi-ionic effects on energy production based on double layer expansion by salinity exchange. J. Colloid Interface Sci.446, 335–344. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.009
25
Fitzsimons E. Warren P. (2024). Desalination investment for copper mining: barriers and opportunities in Chile. Extr. Industries Soc.17, 101449. 10.1016/j.exis.2024.101449
26
Foo Z. H. Lienhard J. H. (2025). Emerging membrane technologies for sustainable lithium extraction from brines and leachates: innovations, challenges, and industrial scalability. Desalination598, 118411. 10.1016/j.desal.2024.118411
27
Furness M. F. Bello-Mendoza R. Güereca L. P. Chamy Maggi R. (2024). The biofactories: quantifying environmental benefits of the wastewater circular economy in Chile using life cycle assessment. Circ. Econ.3, 100091. 10.1016/j.cec.2024.100091
28
Gaber R. I. Hong S. Kuttiani Ali J. Abdulhamid M. A. Bahamon D. Vega L. F. et al (2025). Development of high ion-selective montmorillonite-incorporated polyethersulfone nanocomposite membranes for salinity gradient energy harvesting. Chem. Eng. J.503, 158607. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.158607
29
Galleguillos F. Cáceres L. Maxwell L. Soliz Á. (2020). Electrochemical ion pumping device for blue energy recovery: mixing entropy battery. Appl. Sci.10, 5537. 10.3390/app10165537
30
Galleguillos-Madrid F. M. Salazar-Avalos S. Fuentealba E. Leiva-Guajardo S. Cáceres L. Portillo C. et al (2024). High performance of Mn2O3 electrodes for hydrogen evolution using natural bischofite salt from atacama desert: a novel application for solar saline water splitting. Materials17, 5129. 10.3390/ma17205129
31
Giacalone F. Filingeri A. Tamburini A. Cipollina A. Micale G. (2024). Electrodialysis for sustainable management of seawater-brine: increasing water recovery via production of hypersaline solution for brine-mining processes. Desalination575, 117294. 10.1016/j.desal.2024.117294
32
Goel G. Sharma M. Tripathi S. K. (2025). Prussian blue analogue as cathode materials in sodium ion batteries: a review. J. Energy Storage126, 116995. 10.1016/j.est.2025.116995
33
Gomes W. J. A. S. De Oliveira C. Huguenin F. (2015). Energy harvesting by nickel prussian blue analogue electrode in neutralization and mixing entropy batteries. Langmuir31, 8710–8717. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01419
34
Gómez J. S. Marín L. G. Morales H. K. Llor A. Hincapié V. Vuelvas J. et al (2025). Fueling the transition: a comprehensive analysis of hydrogen roadmaps in Chile, Brazil and Colombia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.222, 115885. 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115885
35
Gutiérrez G. Ruiz-León D. (2024). Lithium in Chile: present status and future outlook. Mater Adv.10.1039/d4ma00625a
36
Haj Mohammad Hosein Tehrani S. Seyedsadjadi S. A. Ghaffarinejad A. (2015). Application of electrodeposited cobalt hexacyanoferrate film to extract energy from water salinity gradients. RSC Adv.5, 30032–30037. 10.1039/C5RA03909F
37
He Z. Korre A. Kelsall G. Nie Z. Colet Lagrille M. (2024). Environmental and life cycle assessment of lithium carbonate production from Chilean atacama brines. RSC Sustain.3, 275–290. 10.1039/d4su00223g
38
Iglesias G. R. Fernández M. M. Ahualli S. Jiménez M. L. Kozynchenko O. P. Delgado A. V. (2014). Materials selection for optimum energy production by double layer expansion methods. J. Power Sources261, 371–377. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.125
39
Jabarullakhan M. A. Kandasamy R. (2025). Electrochemical evaluation of MnSiO3/MnO composite derived from manganese ore waste for supercapacitor applications. Fuel400, 135759. 10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135759
40
Jia Z. Wang B. Song S. Fan Y. (2013). A membrane-less Na ion battery-based CAPMIX cell for energy extraction using water salinity gradients. RSC Adv.3, 26205. 10.1039/c3ra44902e
41
Jia Z. Wang B. Song S. Fan Y. (2014a). Blue energy: current technologies for sustainable power generation from water salinity gradient. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.31, 91–100. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.049
42
Jia Z. Wang J. Wang Y. (2014b). Electrochemical sodium storage of copper hexacyanoferrate with a well-defined open framework for sodium ion batteries. RSC Adv.4, 22768–22774. 10.1039/C4RA02559H
43
Jia Z. Wang B. Wang Y. (2015). Copper hexacyanoferrate with a well-defined open framework as a positive electrode for aqueous zinc ion batteries. Mater Chem. Phys.149, 601–606. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.11.014
44
Jin X. Lu J. Liu P. Tong H. (2003). The electrochemical formation and reduction of a thick AgCl deposition layer on a silver substrate. J. Electroanal. Chem.542, 85–96. 10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01474-2
45
Kasiri G. Glenneberg J. Bani Hashemi A. Kun R. La Mantia F. (2019). Mixed copper-zinc hexacyanoferrates as cathode materials for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater19, 360–369. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.03.006
46
Kidder J. A. Leybourne M. I. Layton-Matthews D. Bowell R. J. Rissmann C. F. W. (2020). A review of hydrogeochemical mineral exploration in the atacama desert, Chile. Ore Geol. Rev.124, 103562. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103562
47
Kim T. Rahimi M. Logan B. E. Gorski C. A. (2016a). Evaluating battery-like reactions to harvest energy from salinity differences using ammonium bicarbonate salt solutions. ChemSusChem9, 981–988. 10.1002/cssc.201501669
48
Kim T. Rahimi M. Logan B. E. Gorski C. A. (2016b). Harvesting energy from salinity differences using battery electrodes in a concentration flow cell. Environ. Sci. Technol.50, 9791–9797. 10.1021/acs.est.6b02554
49
Kiviat F. E. (1976). Energy recovery from saline water by means of electrochemical cells. Science194 (194), 719–720. 10.1126/science.194.4266.719
50
La Mantia F. Pasta M. Deshazer H. D. Logan B. E. Cui Y. (2011). Batteries for efficient energy extraction from a water salinity difference. Nanoletters11, 1810–1813. 10.1021/nl200500s
51
Lagos G. Cifuentes L. Peters D. Castro L. Valdés J. M. (2024). Carbon footprint and water inventory of the production of lithium in the Atacama Salt Flat, Chile. Environ. Challenges16, 100962. 10.1016/j.envc.2024.100962
52
Lee J. Yoon H. Lee J. Kim T. Yoon J. (2017). Extraction of salinity-gradient energy by a hybrid capacitive-mixing system. ChemSusChem10, 1600–1606. 10.1002/cssc.201601656
53
Li J.-J. Zhang W.-B. Zhou X. Theint M. M. Yin Y. Yang J.-L. et al (2023). Electrochemical conversion of salinity gradient energy via molybdenum disulfide electrode. J. Electrochem Soc.170, 020518. 10.1149/1945-7111/acb8e4
54
Li H. Cheng X. Zhao J. Gao M. Xu H. Wang X. (2025a). Recent advancements of high entropy ceramic/carbon composites toward rechargeable batteries. J. Alloys Compd.1010, 178237. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.178237
55
Li H. Sun X. Huang H. (2025b). The concept of high entropy for rechargeable batteries. Prog. Mater Sci.148, 101382. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101382
56
Lima G. Morais W. Gomes W. Huguenin F. (2017). Acid–base machines: electrical work from neutralization reactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 31202–31215. 10.1039/C7CP05362B
57
Liu X. Chen X. Zhao Z. Liang X. (2014). Effect of Na+ on Li extraction from brine using LiFePO 4/FePO4 electrodes. Hydrometallurgy146, 24–28. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.03.010
58
Liu X. Liu N. Zhao C. Liu Q. Liu Y. Liu Z. et al (2022). Hard carbon with an “adsorption-intercalation/filling” behavior for selective deionization of lithium ions. Desalination544, 116124. 10.1016/j.desal.2022.116124
59
Liu J. Nan T. Su A. Bai K. Zhu Q. Shi P. et al (2025). In-situ selective extracting lithium from waste LiFePO4 cathode by gas–solid oxidative deintercalation. Sep. Purif. Technol.364, 132597. 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132597
60
Logan B. Elimelech M. (2012). Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature488, 313–319. 10.1038/nature11477
61
Lu K. Song B. Gao X. Dai H. Zhang J. Ma H. (2016). High-energy cobalt hexacyanoferrate and carbon micro-spheres aqueous sodium-ion capacitors. J. Power Sources303, 347–353. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.031
62
Luccini E. Rivas M. Rojas E. (2016). Cloud optical depth from total and UV solar irradiance measurements at two sites of the Atacama Desert in Chile. Atmos. Res.174 (175), 18–30. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.01.007
63
Lv Z. B. Xu L. Chen C. Chen Z. H. Fu M. L. Yuan B. (2025). Selective recovery of lithium from spent LiFePO4 batteries based on PMS advanced oxidation process. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.13, 115735. 10.1016/j.jece.2025.115735
64
Man J. Cui Y. Liu W. Sun X. Liu K. Wang D. et al (2025). In-situ construction of Ag protective layer with trace amount of electrolyte additive towards highly reversible Zn anode. J. Power Sources633, 236436. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236436
65
Marino M. Misuri L. Carati A. Brogioli D. (2014). Proof-of-concept of a zinc-silver battery for the extraction of energy from a concentration difference. Energies (Basel)7, 3664–3683. 10.3390/en7063664
66
Marino M. Misuri L. Ruffo R. Brogioli D. (2015). Electrode kinetics in the “capacitive mixing” and “battery mixing” techniques for energy production from salinity differences. Electrochim Acta176, 1065–1073. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.069
67
Marino M. Kozynchenko O. Tennison S. Brogioli D. (2016). Capacitive mixing with electrodes of the same kind for energy production from salinity differences. J. Phys. Condens. Matter28, 114004. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/11/114004
68
Marinova S. Roche L. Link A. Finkbeiner M. (2025). Water footprint of battery-grade lithium production in the Salar de Atacama, Chile. J. Clean. Prod.487, 144635. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144635
69
Marzo A. Ferrada P. Beiza F. Besson P. Alonso-Montesinos J. Ballestrín J. et al (2018). Standard or local solar spectrum? Implications for solar technologies studies in the Atacama Desert. Renew. Energy127, 871–882. 10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.039
70
Md Hasan K. N. Khai T. Kannan R. Zakaria Z. (2017). Harnessing ‘blue energy’: a review on techniques and preliminary analysis. MATEC Web Conf.131, 04013. 10.1051/matecconf/201713104013
71
Meng Z. H. Wu S. H. Sun S. W. Xu Z. Zhang X. C. Wang X. M. et al (2020). Formation and oxidation reactivity of MnO2+(HCO3–)n in the MnII(HCO3–)–H2O2 system. Inorg. Chem.59, 3171–3180. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03524
72
Mojid M. R. Lee K. J. You J. (2024). A review on advances in direct lithium extraction from continental brines: ion-sieve adsorption and electrochemical methods for varied Mg/Li ratios. Sustain. Mater. Technol.40, e00923. 10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e00923
73
Morais W. Gomes W. Huguenin F. (2016). Neutralization pseudocapacitors: an acid-base machine. J. Phys. Chem. C120, 17872–17877. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04480
74
Naranjo D. Fuentes F. Muñoz I. (2025). Industrial solar heat potential in Chile: a technical-economic analysis. Sol. Energy Adv.5, 100082. 10.1016/j.seja.2024.100082
75
Nasir M. Nakanishi Y. Patmonoaji A. Suekane T. (2020). Effects of porous electrode pore size and operating flow rate on the energy production of capacitive energy extraction. Renew. Energy155, 278–285. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.163
76
Osorio-Aravena J. C. Aghahosseini A. Bogdanov D. Caldera U. Ghorbani N. Mensah T. N. O. et al (2021). The impact of renewable energy and sector coupling on the pathway towards a sustainable energy system in Chile. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.151, 111557. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111557
77
Osorio-Aravena J. C. Muñoz-Cerón E. Aguilera J. de la Casa J. Reyes-Chamorro L. (2025). Enablers, trends, opportunities and scenarios for solar photovoltaic prosumers in Chile. Energy Strategy Rev.58, 101693. 10.1016/j.esr.2025.101693
78
Ou J. Kang S. Chen J. E J. Liao G. Zhang F. et al (2024). Study on the selective recovery of metals from lithium iron phosphate cathode materials based on hydrothermal oxidation. J. Energy Storage101, 113832. 10.1016/j.est.2024.113832
79
Oyarzún-Aravena A. M. Chen J. Brownbridge G. Akroyd J. Kraft M. (2025). An analysis of renewable energy resources and options for the energy transition in Chile. Appl. Energy381, 125107. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125107
80
Pargar F. Kolev H. Koleva D. A. van Breugel K. (2018). Microstructure, surface chemistry and electrochemical response of Ag|AgCl sensors in alkaline media. J. Mater Sci.53, 7527–7550. 10.1007/s10853-018-2083-0
81
Pasta M. Wessells C. D. Cui Y. La Mantia F. (2012). A desalination battery. Nanoletters12, 839–843. 10.1021/nl203889e
82
Pattle R. (1954). Production of electric power by mixing fresh and salt water in the hydroelectric pile. Nature174, 660. 10.1038/174660a0
83
Phuc-Hanh Tran D. You S. J. Bui X. T. Wang Y. F. Ramos A. (2024). Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater: progress in resource and energy recovery improvement approaches. J. Environ. Manage366, 121855. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121855
84
Popović A. S. Jugović D. Grgur B. N. (2023). Electrochemical formation and behavior of silver and lead chlorides as potential cathodes for quasi-rechargeable magnesium seawater cell. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.34, 1155. 10.1007/s10854-023-10558-9
85
Reale E. R. Regenwetter L. Agrawal A. Dardón B. Dicola N. Sanagala S. et al (2021). Low porosity, high areal-capacity Prussian blue analogue electrodes enhance salt removal and thermodynamic efficiency in symmetric faradaic deionization with automated fluid control. Water Res.13, 100116. 10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100116
86
Rodríguez-Córdova N. Sarmiento-Laurel C. Estay H. Behzad M. (2025). Transient transport phenomena in lithium-rich solar evaporation ponds: a case study in the Atacama Salt Flat, Chile. Energy Convers. Manag.340, 119873. 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119873
87
Salazar-Avalos S. Soliz A. Cáceres L. Conejeros S. Brito I. Galvez E. et al (2023). Metal recovery from natural saline brines with an electrochemical ion pumping method using hexacyanoferrate materials as electrodes. Nanomaterials13, 2557. 10.3390/nano13182557
88
Salerno D. Ziano R. Mantegazza F. Van Roij R. Brogioli D. (2013). Capacitive mixing for harvesting the free energy of solutions at different concentrations. Entropy15, 1388–1407. 10.3390/e15041388
89
Sampedro T. Mazo E. Gómez-Coma L. Arruti A. Fallanza M. Pinedo J. et al (2024). Harnessing salinity gradient energy: pushing forward in water reclamation via on-site reverse electrodialysis technology. J. Environ. Manage371, 123251. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123251
90
Shafer M. M. Overdier J. T. Armstong D. E. (1998). Removal, partitioning, and fate of silver and other metals in wastewater treatment plants and effluent‐receiving streams. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.17, 630–641. 10.1002/etc.5620170416
91
Smolinska-Kempisty K. Siekierka A. Bryjak M. (2020). Interpolymer ion exchange membranes for CapMix process. Desalination482, 114384. 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114384
92
Soler D. Rigamonti L. Gazbour N. Fuentealba E. (2025). Environmental performance of a 1 MW photovoltaic plant in the Atacama Desert: a life cycle assessment study. Sol. Energy292, 113454. 10.1016/j.solener.2025.113454
93
Soo A. Kim J. Shon H. K. (2024). Technologies for the wastewater circular economy – a review. Desalination Water Treat.317, 100205. 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100205
94
Suu L. Lim J. Lee J. H. Choi Y. Choi J. S. (2025). Advances in electrochemical recovery of valuable metals: a focus on lithium. Desalination612, 118960. 10.1016/j.desal.2025.118960
95
Tan G. Zhu X. (2020). Polyelectrolyte-coated copper hexacyanoferrate and bismuth oxychloride electrodes for efficient salinity gradient energy recovery in capacitive mixing. Energy Technol.8, 1900863. 10.1002/ente.201900863
96
Trocoli R. Bidhendi G. K. Mantia F. (2016). Lithium recovery by means of electrochemical ion pumping: a comparison between salt capturing and selective exchange. J. Phys. Condens. Matter28, 114005. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/11/114005
97
Véliz K. D. Walters J. P. Fica C. Busco C. (2025). Modeling the interconnected drivers of power sector decarbonization in Chile. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.211, 115299. 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115299
98
Vvedenskii A. Grushevskaya S. Kudryashov D. Kuznetsova T. (2007). Kinetic peculiarities of anodic dissolution of silver and Ag-Au alloys under the conditions of oxide formation. Corros. Sci.49, 4523–4541. 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.03.046
99
Wan C. F. Chung T. S. (2015). Osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater brine as the draw solution and wastewater retentate as the feed. J. Memb. Sci.479, 148–158. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.036
100
Wang C. Yao M. An W. Ding Z. Zhang C. Chen J. et al (2025a). Bond structure enhancement of Mn–O bonds to form high cycle stability manganese-rich olivine-type cathode. Chem. Eng. J.518, 164453. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.164453
101
Wang Z. Ni Z. Chen J. Dai Y. Gao Y. Zhang Q. et al (2025b). Recent progress and challenges on emerging high-entropy materials for better Zn-Air and Zn-Ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater75, 104064. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104064
102
Wei Y. Zhang Q. Han Y. Xu X. Zhao W. Hu Y. et al (2025). Electrochemical lithium extraction from high Mg/Li brine using LiMn2O4-Zn mixed-ion battery. Sep. Purif. Technol.354, 129372. 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129372
103
Wimmer A. Ritsema R. Schuster M. Krystek P. (2019). Sampling and pre-treatment effects on the quantification of (nano)silver and selected trace elements in surface water - application in a Dutch case study. Sci. Total Environ.663, 154–161. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.244
104
Xu W. Liu D. Liu X. Wang D. He L. Zhao Z. (2023). Highly selective and efficient lithium extraction from brines by constructing a novel multiple-crack-porous LiFePO4/FePO4 electrode. Desalination546, 116188. 10.1016/j.desal.2022.116188
105
Yangyang Wang G. Z. G. D. Zhang G. Dong G. Zheng H. (2022). Research progress of working electrode in electrochemical extraction of lithium from brine. Batteries8, 225. 10.3390/batteries8110225
106
Ye M. Pasta M. Xie X. Cui Y. Criddle C. (2014). Performance of a mixing entropy battery alternately flushed with wastewater effluent and seawater for recovery of salinity-gradient energy. Energy Environ. Sci.7, 2295–2300. 10.1039/c4ee01034e
107
Ye M. Pasta M. Xie X. Dubrawski K. L. Xu J. Liu C. et al (2019). Charge-free mixing entropy battery enabled by low-cost electrode materials. ACS Omega4, 11785–11790. 10.1021/acsomega.9b00863
108
Yim H. Park K. R. Shim B. Oh S. H. Kim B. S. Kim W. B. (2025). Synergistic effects of embedded Ag nanoparticles and surface SiO2 layers on recycled silicon anodes for high performance lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J.504, 158865. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.158865
109
Yue X. Liu J. Wang J. Wan J. Wang X. Lv Y. et al (2025). Selective lithium extraction from natural brine with high Na/Li and Mg/Li ratios using a polyporous LiMn0.5Fe0.5PO4/C electrode. Desalination609, 118859. 10.1016/j.desal.2025.118859
110
Zhan J. Yao Y. Wang X. (2025). Electrochemical technologies for sustainable agricultural water treatment and resource recovery. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.20, 101029. 10.1016/j.ijoes.2025.101029
111
Zhang M. Wang W. Jiang L. Chang Z. Wei D. Anwar H. et al (2024). In-situ oxidation for selective lithium extraction from spent LiFePO4 cathodes by low acid dosage. J. Industrial Eng. Chem.139, 473–480. 10.1016/j.jiec.2024.05.024
112
Zhang Y. Gao Z. Su Z. (2025). Selective leaching of metal components from the spent LiFePO4 cathode material using (NH4)2S2O8. Ceram. Int.51, 31941–31948. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.04.384
113
Zhou X. Zhang W. B. Han X. W. Chai S. S. Guo S. B. Zhang X. L. et al (2022). Principles and materials of mixing entropy battery and capacitor for future harvesting salinity gradient energy. ACS Appl. Energy Mater5, 3979–4001. 10.1021/acsaem.1c03528
Summary
Keywords
blue energy, Mixing Entropy Battery (MEB), salinity gradient energy, electrochemical ion pumping, Atacama Desert, Atacama brine
Citation
Galleguillos Madrid FM, Salazar-Avalos S, Bergendahl M, Quispe J, Toro N, Casanueva-Yáñez G and Soliz A (2025) Blue energy recovery in the Atacama Desert using electrochemical ion pumping devices: a Chilean perspective on salinity gradient energy. Front. Chem. 13:1659479. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1659479
Received
04 July 2025
Accepted
08 August 2025
Published
19 August 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Fang Yi, Sun Yat-sen University, China
Reviewed by
Mohamed Essalhi, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Morocco
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Galleguillos Madrid, Salazar-Avalos, Bergendahl, Quispe, Toro, Casanueva-Yáñez and Soliz.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Felipe M. Galleguillos Madrid, felipe.galleguillos.madrid@uantof.cl
ORCID: Sebastian Salazar-Avalos, orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-2413; Markus Bergendahl, orcid.org/0009-0005-6253-087X; Galvarino Casanueva-Yáñez, orcid.org/0000-0002-6154-1551
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.