You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

EDITORIAL article

Front. Chem., 07 November 2025

Sec. Porous Crystalline Networks

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2025.1722377

Editorial: Retroconstruction of porous crystalline networks for a sustainable future

  • 1. Department of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China

  • 2. Hong Kong Institute for Clean Energy, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China

Article metrics

View details

1,3k

Views

82

Downloads

The 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, awarded to Susumu Kitagawa, Richard Robson, and Omar M. Yaghi, celebrates their pioneering work on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) (Hoskins and Robson, 1990; Kondo et al., 1997; Yaghi et al., 1995), a class of porous crystalline networks (PCNs) built from metal nodes and organic linkers. This breakthrough introduced a new paradigm in materials design, enabling the creation of nanosized cavities with molecular precision. From this foundation, “reticular chemistry” (Yaghi et al., 2019) has flourished, expanding PCNs to include covalent organic frameworks (COFs) (Côté et al., 2005) and hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs) (He et al., 2011). By linking molecular building blocks through strong bonds like coordination, covalent, or hydrogen interactions, reticular chemistry unlocks vast chemical diversity. This high designability encodes functions such as gas storage, separation, and catalysis into PCNs. Yet, despite these advances, industrial-scale “killer applications” remain scarce, with only a few showing real-world promise. With the groundwork laid, what lies ahead for PCNs?

Timed to coincide with the Nobel recognition, this Research Topic assembles five articles that bridge fundamental PCN research with sustainability challenges amid the climate crisis. The Research Topic spans structural modulation (Johnson et al.), materials hybridization (Hossain et al.), and applications in carbon capture (Cammarere et al.), energy storage (Ghuffar and Noh), and wastewater treatment (Mohammed Yaseen et al.). Central to this is our proposed “retroconstruction” approach, which merges retrosynthesis (designing molecules backward from desired outcomes) with retroengineering (deconstructing problems to identify solutions). Retroconstruction involves three steps: (1) identifying essential properties needed for real-world problems; (2) selecting molecular motifs, topologies, and pore structures to achieve them; and (3) developing efficient synthesis and processing methods. This framework shifts PCNs from serendipitous discoveries to targeted tools for sustainability.

Carbon capture is pivotal for curbing anthropogenic emissions and meeting the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting global warming to 2 °C above preindustrial levels (Baker et al., 2018; Masson-Delmotte et al., 2018). Traditional amine scrubbing is energy-intensive, prone to sorbent degradation, and challenging to retrofit (Rochelle Gary, 2009). PCNs, with their tunable porosity for reversible gas adsorption, offer a solvent-free alternative (Lin et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2024). However, water vapor in flue gases or air often competes with CO2, reducing efficacy (Siegelman et al., 2019). Cammarere et al. review water-enhanced CO2 capture in MOFs, highlighting mechanisms like dipole-quadrupole interactions, water dissociation creating new adsorption sites, nanopocket confinement, and chemical sorption via carbamates, carbamic acids, or bicarbonates. By retroconstructing MOFs by choosing specific metal nodes, ligands, topologies, and pores, these designs optimize performance under humid conditions, paving the way for efficient point-source or direct air capture.

Equally vital for carbon neutrality are renewable energy technologies, which demand advanced electrochemical devices like batteries and electrolyzers. A key hurdle is understanding lithium-ion-coupled electron transfer (LCET) reactions at electrode-electrolyte interfaces, including their thermodynamics and Li+-electron stoichiometry, which is vital in cathode design in Li-ion batteries (Nikitina et al., 2017). Bulk metal oxides often fail to show Nernstian behavior with Li+ concentrations, precluding the derivation of LCET thermochemistry. Ghuffar and Noh address this through retroconstruction: a Zr-based MOF confines tungsten oxide (WOx) into nanoparticles within its pores, creating an ideal platform for LCET studies. This nano-confinement reveals precise stoichiometry and Gibbs free energy, offering insights for energy storage and conversion that align with sustainable electrification.

Clean water access, another UN Sustainable Development Goal, faces threats from chemical pollutants and pathogens. Retroconstructing PCNs can yield multifunctional materials for wastewater treatment (Li et al., 2021). Mohammed Yaseen et al. introduce a vanadium-based MOF with 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid ligands, combining porosity for dye adsorption with antimicrobial properties against agents like E. coli. This synergy derived from bioactive ligands and porosity demonstrates how targeted design addresses dual challenges in water purification.

Practical deployment of PCNs is often hampered by their powdery form, limiting processability. Hossain et al. review covalent integration of polymers with PCNs, such as MOFs, COFs and HOFs, to create hybrids with enhanced stability, flexibility, and scalability. These strategies overcome traditional drawbacks, enabling retroconstruction for industrial applications like membranes or coatings.

At the heart of PCN functionality are their topologies and porosities, yet MOF structures can be unpredictable due to metal multivalency and ligand conformations (Jiang et al., 2021). Johnson et al. probe this in tetraphenylethene-based MOFs, using rotamer and pillar ligands to control net dimensionality, pore sizes, and surface areas. This modular approach exemplifies retroconstruction, facilitating rational design for tailored applications without reinventing building blocks.

These articles collectively illustrate retroconstruction’s power: by deconstructing sustainability problems and reassembling PCNs accordingly, we can accelerate real-world impact. Challenges persist in scalability, cost, and environmental stability, which must be addressed through interdisciplinary efforts, including AI-driven design and lifecycle assessments. Nonetheless, the future of PCNs centers on rational innovation to transform energy systems, reduce emissions, and ensure resource equity, aligning with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.

In this Nobel-inspired moment, retroconstruction invites us to envision PCNs not as mere materials, but as architects of a sustainable future that is porous with possibility.

Statements

Author contributions

XL: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. XL acknowledges the funding support from the City University of Hong Kong (9382002 and 7020132) and the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (9048340).

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    Baker H. S. Millar R. J. Karoly D. J. Beyerle U. Guillod B. P. Mitchell D. et al (2018). Higher CO2 concentrations increase extreme event risk in a 1.5 °C world. Nat. Clim. Change8, 604608. 10.1038/s41558-018-0190-1

  • 2

    Côté A. P. Benin A. I. Ockwig N. W. O'Keeffe M. Matzger A. J. Yaghi O. M. (2005). Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science310, 11661170. 10.1126/science.1120411

  • 3

    He Y. Xiang S. Chen B. (2011). A microporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework for highly selective C2H2/C2H4 separation at ambient temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 1457014573. 10.1021/ja2066016

  • 4

    Hoskins B. F. Robson R. (1990). Design and construction of a new class of scaffolding-like materials comprising infinite polymeric frameworks of 3D-linked molecular rods. A reappraisal of the zinc cyanide and cadmium cyanide structures and the synthesis and structure of the diamond-related frameworks [N(CH3)4] [CuIZnII(CN)4] and CuI[4,4',4'',4'''-tetracyanotetraphenylmethane]BF4·xC6H5NO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc.112, 15461554. 10.1021/ja00160a038

  • 5

    Jiang H. Alezi D. Eddaoudi M. (2021). A reticular chemistry guide for the design of periodic solids. Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 466487. 10.1038/s41578-021-00287-y

  • 6

    Kondo M. Yoshitomi T. Matsuzaka H. Kitagawa S. Seki K. (1997). Three-dimensional framework with channeling cavities for small molecules: {[M2(4, 4′-bpy)3(NO3)4]·xH2O}n (M · Co, Ni, Zn). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.36, 17251727. 10.1002/anie.199717251

  • 7

    Li R. Chen T. Pan X. (2021). Metal–organic-framework-based materials for antimicrobial applications. ACS Nano15, 38083848. 10.1021/acsnano.0c09617

  • 8

    Lin J.-B. Nguyen Tai T. T. Vaidhyanathan R. Burner J. Taylor Jared M. Durekova H. et al (2021). A scalable metal-organic framework as a durable physisorbent for carbon dioxide capture. Science374, 14641469. 10.1126/science.abi7281

  • 9

    Masson-Delmotte V. Zhai P. Pörtner H.-O. Roberts D. Skea J. Shukla P. R. et al (2018). “Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways,” in The context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change (Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretariat). Available online at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf.

  • 10

    Nikitina V. A. Zakharkin M. V. Vassiliev S. Y. Yashina L. V. Antipov E. V. Stevenson K. J. (2017). Lithium ion coupled electron-transfer rates in superconcentrated electrolytes: exploring the bottlenecks for fast charge-transfer rates with LiMn2O4 cathode materials. Langmuir33, 93789389. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01016

  • 11

    Rochelle Gary T. (2009). Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science325, 16521654. 10.1126/science.1176731

  • 12

    Siegelman R. L. Milner P. J. Forse A. C. Lee J.-H. Colwell K. A. Neaton J. B. et al (2019). Water enables efficient CO2 capture from natural gas flue emissions in an oxidation-resistant diamine-appended metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 1317113186. 10.1021/jacs.9b05567

  • 13

    Yaghi O. M. Li G. Li H. (1995). Selective binding and removal of guests in a microporous metal–organic framework. Nature378, 703706. 10.1038/378703a0

  • 14

    Yaghi O. M. Kalmutzki M. J. Diercks C. S. (2019). Introduction to reticular chemistry. Wiley. 10.1002/9783527821099.fmatter

  • 15

    Zhou Z. Ma T. Zhang H. Chheda S. Li H. Wang K. et al (2024). Carbon dioxide capture from open air using covalent organic frameworks. Nature635, 96101. 10.1038/s41586-024-08080-x

Summary

Keywords

porous crystalline networks, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs), carbon capture, wastewater treatment, lithium-ion-coupled electron transfer, crystal engineering

Citation

Li X (2025) Editorial: Retroconstruction of porous crystalline networks for a sustainable future. Front. Chem. 13:1722377. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1722377

Received

10 October 2025

Accepted

24 October 2025

Published

07 November 2025

Volume

13 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Felix Zamora, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Xing Li,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics