Abstract
Branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (brGDGTs) are membrane lipids produced by bacteria usually ascribed to soil and peat deposits. The presence of brGDGTs in marine sediments can thus be used to track terrigenous organic matter inputs to the continental margin and to infer the local continental mean annual air temperature (MAT) and soil pH. The proxy rationale is based on the degree methylation and cyclization of the brGDGTs from terrestrial bacteria, but recently evidence was found of river and oceanic production of brGDGTs with similar configuration, indicating the necessity to better constrain the applicability of the soil brGDGTs in the marine realm. Here we considered crenarchaeol and brGDGTs obtained in 46 core-top sediments from cross-margin transects in the Campos Basin in the Southwest Atlantic, with the goal to evaluate the effectiveness of the brGDGT-associated proxies in a region in the southeastern tropical Brazilian continental margin influenced by upwelling events and low terrigenous inputs. The separation of the 5- and 6-methyl brGDGTs proved to be essential for a better evaluation of the sources of brGDGTs in the environment. Direct evidence of input of terrigenous organic matter by the medium-sized Paraíba do Sul River and other small rivers in the region were observed. More importantly, the high proportions of ring-containing brGDGTs—and the consequent increased values of the #ringstetra–in the sediments deposited between 75 and 400 m water depths (mid-shelf to upper slope) were clear evidence of marine in situ production of brGDGTs. In some stations deeper than 1,900 m, an increase in the acyclic 6-methyl hexamethylated compounds can also be ascribed to in situ production. Our results revealed that the initial soil signal is lost during transport and after river discharge in the Campos Basin, which compromise the use of brGDGTs to reconstruct the soil pH and MAT of the nearby land area.
Introduction
Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) are lipids present in the cell membranes of Archaea and bacteria and occur in the environment in the isoprenoid (isoGDGTs) and branched (brGDGTs) forms (Schouten et al., ). While isoGDGTs are most likely to occur in the terrestrial aquatic and marine environments, brGDGTs are attributed to anaerobic and heterotrophic bacteria present in peat and soil (Pancost and Sinninghe Damsté, ; Weijers et al., , ). Therefore, to evaluate the input and distribution of terrigenous OM in the continental margin, brGDGTs can be used as alternative proxies to the more common tracers derived from higher plants (Hopmans et al., ).
BrGDGT structures vary in the degree of methylation (4-6) and cyclization (up to 2 cyclopentane rings) (Weijers et al., , , Figure 1). The relative abundance of the individual forms of brGDGTs in the lipid membranes varies as a function of different environmental conditions, which could possibly be ascribed to a necessity to maintain the bacterial cellular structure and its vital functions. Weijers et al. () found a significant correlation between the cyclic brGDGTs and the pH of terrigenous materials, and between the methylation of the brGDGTs and both soil pH and the mean annual air temperature (MAT), leading to the definition of the cyclization of branched tetraethers (CBT), and methylation of branched tetraethers (MBT) indices. The MBT was later simplified by Peterse et al. () to the MBT' index. Both indices are widely used in paleoenvironmental studies to evaluate soil pH and MAT, based on regional and/or global calibrations. When applied to marine sediments, brGDGT-reconstructed MAT usually corresponds well with temperatures from the nearby land (Weijers et al., ; Rueda et al., ) in areas with a relatively high amount of terrestrial OM input (Peterse et al., ). However, even though the brGDGTs are predominantly terrigenous, it was demonstrated that they can potentially be derived from in situ production in the river (Zell et al., , ; De Jonge et al., ) and in the marine realm (Peterse et al., ; Zhu et al., ; Hu et al., ; Liu et al., ; Zell et al., ,; Sinninghe Damsté, ), which may constrain the use of the MBT'/CBT proxies.
Figure 1
Recently, a new chromatographic method developed using two HPLC silica columns enabled the separation of the 5- and 6-methyl compounds (De Jonge et al., , ; Hopmans et al., , Figure 1). This new method revealed that the 6-methyl isomer can be present in the water column and sediment from a lake, even if not detected in the soil of the lake's catchment (Weber et al., ). Moreover, the predominance of 6-methyl brGDGT in suspended particulate matter from a Siberian river was not consistent with the soil characteristics from the watershed (De Jonge et al., ). Based on the evidences that in situ production of brGDGTs can only be ruled out by the separate quantification of the 5- and 6-methyl isomers, as well as on the observation of a good correlation between the abundance of 6-methyl brGDGTs with soil pH, De Jonge et al. () proposed the new MBT'5ME and CBT' indices. The first excludes the 6-methyl brGDGT from the equation and removes the pH dependency from the MAT global calibration reducing the residual mean error from 5 to 4.6°C, whereas the second includes the 6-methyl and reduces the error from 0.8 to 0.5 in soil pH reconstructions (Peterse et al., ; De Jonge et al., ). The BIT index (Hopmans et al., ) was proposed to infer the contributions of soil OM to the ocean. It is based on the ratio of the continentally derived brGDGTs and the marine crenarchaeol, an isoprenoid GDGT produced by cosmopolitan pelagic Thaumarchaeota. In addition to the characterization of soil OM, the BIT index also provides information about the applicability of the GDGT-derived proxies in a particular region (Zhu et al., ). As there is evidence for limited terrestrial sources of crenarchaeol, confidence in the BIT values requires evaluation of the relative contributions of allochthonous and autochthonous sources to the total isoprenoid GDGTs, which are derived from archaea, in continental margin sediments (Weijers et al., ).
The Campos Basin, in the south-eastern Brazilian continental margin, is of particular ecological and biogeochemical relevance because of the great diversity in the pelagic and benthic ecosystems (Falcão et al., ) that results from the influence of large to meso-scale hydrodynamic fronts in the region (Brandini et al., ). An important feature is the coastal and shelf break upwelling system off Cabo Frio (~23°S; Figure 2A), which supports primary production rates of 0.04–0.45 mg C m−2 d−1 (Gonzalez-Rodriguez et al., ; Metzler et al., ; Brandini et al., ). These values are among the highest measured in the Brazilian continental margin and contrast with the overall oligotrophic conditions induced by the warm and nutrient-poor waters transported by the Brazil Current (Silveira et al., ). As a consequence of the upwelling events, predominance of autochthonous OM in the basin's sediments on a regional scale is observed (Yoshinaga et al., ; Carreira et al., ; Cordeiro et al., ), a scenario also favored by a relatively low input of allochthonous OM (Carreira et al., ). The major contributor to continentally-derived materials to the Campos Basin is the Paraíba do Sul river, located to the north of the basin (Figure 2), as evidenced by isotopic and molecular markers (Souza et al., ; Albuquerque et al., ; Carreira et al., ), dissolved black carbon (Dittmar et al., ) and metals (Lacerda et al., ; Carvalho et al., ; Araujo et al., ). Even though the Paraíba do Sul River plays a minor role as source of material to the global oceans when compared to other rivers, the influence of Paraíba do Sul River is relevant on a regional scale (Carvalho et al., ).
Figure 2
The south-eastern Brazilian continental margin has proved to be a crucial region for paleoclimate studies (Rühlemann and Butzin,
Study Area
The Campos Basin (Figure 2) extends over an area of 100,000 km2, in the south-eastern Brazilian continental margin between 20.5°S (Vitoria High) and 24°S (Cabo Frio High). The continental shelf has an average width of 100 km and the shelf break water depth varies from 80 m in the northern area to 130 m in the south. The slope, marked by the presence of several submarine canyons and channels, extends over 40 km with an average gradient of 2.5° (Viana et al.,
The circulation in the Campos Basin is mainly controlled by the Brazil Current, formed at 10°S as a southern branch of the South Equatorial Current (Peterson and Stramma,
In the northern Campos Basin, the Paraíba do Sul River (Figure 2), a medium sized river with approximately 1,145 km of extension, flows into the ocean and is the major source of terrestrial material to the basin. The river drains an area of 55,400 km2 (Figures 2B–D), crossing three of the most industrialized states of Brazil: Minas Gerais, São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro (Carvalho et al.,
The climate in the Paraíba do Sul River drainage area is subtropical with a well-defined precipitation regime. The MAT varies from 10.1°C in the upper basin to 24.1°C (Figure 2B) in the lower basin, with an average of 20.1°C (Fick and Hijmans,
The vegetation in the drainage basin of the Paraíba do Sul River is approximately 70% pastures, 27% agriculture and reforestation areas, and only 3% of the original Atlantic Forest (Ovalle et al.,
The texture of the soil along the Paraíba do Sul River basin is mainly silt/clay, with predominance of clay and sand/clay in the upper basin and clay/sand and clay/silt organic sediments (peat) in the flood-plain areas (Carvalho and Torres,
Materials and Methods
Sampling
Surface sediment samples (0–2 cm) were collected from five cross-shelf transects (A, B, G, H, and I) along 12 isobaths (25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 400, 700, 1,000, 1,300, 1,900, 2,500, and 3,000 m) in the Campos Basin as a part of the Habitats Project (CENPES/PETROBRAS) in 2008 and 2009 (Figure 2). Undisturbed sediments were collected with an adapted large volume Van Veen sampler at the continental shelf stations and with a box corer at the slope stations.
Lipid Extraction and GDGT Analysis
Fractions of about 5 g (±0.01 g) of freeze-dried and homogenized samples were extracted by use of an accelerated solvent extraction system (ASE 200, Dionex), with a mixture of dichloromethane:methanol 9:1 (v:v) at a temperature of 100°C and a pressure of 1,000 psi. A known amount of C46-GDGT was added as internal standard prior to the extraction. The volume of the bulk extracts was rotary evaporated under vacuum and saponified for 2 h at 80°C with 1 mL of KOH (0.1 M) in methanol:H2O (9:1; v:v). The extracts were fractionated into separate fractions using silica gel column chromatography. The polar fraction containing the GDGTs was obtained by eluting with dichloromethane:methanol 1:1 (v:v) and dried under a stream of nitrogen at 40°C.
The GDGT fractions were filtered to remove particles and analyzed using an Agilent 1200 series high performance liquid chromatography system coupled via an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization interface to an Agilent 6120 mass spectrometry (HPLC–APCI-MS). A method enabling the separation of 5- and 6-methyl brGDGTs slightly modified from the one proposed by Hopmans et al. (
The identification of the GDGTs was performed using single ion monitoring (SIM) as described by Schouten et al. (
Calculation of the GDGT-Based Indices
The BIT index was calculated according to Hopmans et al. (
Here and in all following equations, the roman numerals identify the different brGDGTs as illustrated in Figure 1, and “cren” is for crenarchaeol.
The weighted average number of cyclopentane moieties was calculated for the tetramethylated brGDGTs according to Sinninghe Damsté (
To evaluate the fractional abundance of the 6-methyl brGDGTs, the isomer ratio (IR) was calculated according to De Jonge et al. (
The most recent CBT' and MBT'5ME indices were calculated according to De Jonge et al. (
The calculation of the CBT'-derived pH and the MBT'5ME-derived MAT were performed based on the global soil calibrations proposed by De Jonge et al. (
Results
GDGT Distribution and BIT, IR, and #Ringstetra Indices
The content of brGDGTs in the surface sediments showed a geographic distribution similar to the total isoGDGTs (Ceccopieri et al.,
Based on the sediment TOC contents reported by Cordeiro et al. (
Figure 3

Contents of (A) total brGDGTs (μg gTOC−1); (B) acyclic brGDGTs (μg gTOC−1); (C) crenarchaeol (μg gTOC−1), (D) BIT index; (E) #ringstetra index and (F) IR. The total brGDGT and crenarchaeol normalized by the TOC were not determined in sample H1 because the TOC content of this sample was below quantification limit, but the contents in the sediment were comparable to sample H2 (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 1
| Station | Latitude (°S) | Longitude (°W) | Water depth (m) | Location | %acyclic | %1 ring | %2 rings | %Tetramethylated | %Pentamethylated | %Hexamethylated | %5 Me | %6 Me |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil 1 | −22.75 | −43.68 | 0 | Brazil-1 | 99 | 1 | 0 | 93 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
| Soil 2 | −21.13 | −42.8 | 0 | Brazil-3 | 98 | 2 | 1 | 97 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| A01 | −22.92 | −42.01 | 25 | Shelf | 49.1 | 33.1 | 17.9 | 53.2 | 32.5 | 14.3 | 22.0 | 24.8 |
| A02 | −22.93 | −41.90 | 50 | Shelf | 56.2 | 28.8 | 15.0 | 52.5 | 32.5 | 15.0 | 22.5 | 25.0 |
| A04 | −23.14 | −41.90 | 100 | Shelf | 50.5 | 32.3 | 17.3 | 49.8 | 34.4 | 15.8 | 20.8 | 29.4 |
| A05 | −23.60 | −41.36 | 150 | Shelf | 42.1 | 37.2 | 20.7 | 52.5 | 34.2 | 13.3 | 21.1 | 26.4 |
| A06 | −23.63 | −41.33 | 400 | Upper slope | 44.4 | 36.2 | 19.4 | 46.5 | 37.5 | 15.9 | 18.4 | 35.1 |
| A08 | −23.69 | −41.27 | 1,000 | Upper slope | 58.0 | 28.0 | 14.0 | 52.4 | 30.4 | 17.2 | 14.9 | 32.7 |
| A09 | −23.75 | −41.20 | 1,300 | Upper slope | 63.0 | 25.7 | 11.3 | 49.4 | 28.1 | 22.5 | 12.3 | 38.2 |
| A10 | −23.87 | −41.08 | 1,900 | Down slope | 70.2 | 21.3 | 8.5 | 47.1 | 24.7 | 28.2 | 9.0 | 43.8 |
| A11 | −24.02 | −40.90 | 2,500 | Down slope | 79.0 | 15.4 | 5.6 | 39.7 | 20.5 | 39.8 | 6.8 | 53.5 |
| B01 | −22.70 | −41.90 | 25 | Shelf | 59.1 | 27.0 | 13.9 | 60.2 | 30.7 | 9.1 | 18.6 | 21.2 |
| B02 | −22.76 | −41.76 | 50 | Shelf | 52.1 | 30.9 | 17.0 | 52.3 | 32.9 | 14.8 | 20.9 | 26.8 |
| B03 | −23.00 | −41.35 | 75 | Shelf | 48.2 | 33.2 | 18.7 | 49.9 | 36.1 | 13.9 | 21.1 | 28.9 |
| B04 | −23.17 | −41.05 | 100 | shelf | 40.0 | 36.0 | 24.1 | 57.9 | 30.5 | 11.6 | 17.5 | 24.6 |
| B05 | −23.19 | −41.01 | 150 | Shelf | 37.4 | 38.6 | 24.0 | 58.9 | 30.2 | 10.9 | 16.9 | 24.3 |
| B06 | −23.17 | −40.95 | 400 | Upper slope | 51.7 | 32.2 | 16.2 | 48.9 | 33.0 | 18.2 | 20.4 | 30.7 |
| B07 | −23.22 | −40.96 | 700 | Upper slope | 52.3 | 31.4 | 16.3 | 52.3 | 31.9 | 15.8 | 18.5 | 29.2 |
| B08 | −23.23 | −40.93 | 1,000 | Upper slope | 53.2 | 30.7 | 16.1 | 49.7 | 31.6 | 18.8 | 19.6 | 30.7 |
| B09 | −23.25 | −40.90 | 1,300 | Upper slope | 54.9 | 30.2 | 14.9 | 51.4 | 31.4 | 17.2 | 16.9 | 31.7 |
| B10 | −23.31 | −40.79 | 1,900 | Down slope | 69.1 | 21.9 | 8.9 | 47.6 | 26.5 | 26.0 | 10.3 | 42.2 |
| B11 | −23.42 | −40.60 | 2,500 | Down slope | 79.3 | 15.2 | 5.5 | 41.1 | 21.9 | 37.0 | 6.5 | 52.4 |
| B12 | −23.76 | −40.00 | 3,000 | Down slope | 84.4 | 12.1 | 3.6 | 34.7 | 21.0 | 44.4 | 4.4 | 61.0 |
| G03 | −22.06 | −40.17 | 75 | Shelf | 35.6 | 38.2 | 26.2 | 62.2 | 29.5 | 8.3 | 16.0 | 21.8 |
| G04 | −22.04 | −40.08 | 100 | Shelf | 38.6 | 37.5 | 23.9 | 58.9 | 31.0 | 10.1 | 16.5 | 24.6 |
| G05 | −22.10 | −40.05 | 150 | Shelf | 34.3 | 40.9 | 24.9 | 57.4 | 33.2 | 9.4 | 18.3 | 24.3 |
| G07 | −22.13 | −39.90 | 700 | Upper slope | 61.0 | 26.8 | 12.2 | 54.7 | 30.8 | 14.5 | 15.1 | 30.1 |
| G08 | −22.12 | −39.87 | 1,000 | Upper slope | 59.5 | 27.5 | 13.0 | 52.4 | 31.3 | 16.3 | 13.6 | 34.0 |
| G09 | −22.12 | −39.82 | 1,300 | Upper slope | 64.9 | 24.6 | 10.6 | 51.7 | 27.3 | 21.0 | 11.4 | 36.8 |
| G10 | −22.12 | −39.74 | 1,900 | Down slope | 73.0 | 19.7 | 7.4 | 51.6 | 23.7 | 24.6 | 8.7 | 39.7 |
| G11 | −22.17 | −39.14 | 2,500 | Down slope | 84.2 | 11.5 | 4.3 | 39.1 | 23.6 | 37.3 | 6.7 | 54.2 |
| G12 | −22.21 | −38.60 | 3,000 | down slope | 88.9 | 10.0 | 1.2 | 30.1 | 17.0 | 52.9 | 2.2 | 67.7 |
| H01 | −21.72 | −40.53 | 25 | Shelf | 62.1 | 25.8 | 12.1 | 55.6 | 29.2 | 15.2 | 14.5 | 29.9 |
| H02 | −21.74 | −40.29 | 50 | Shelf | 63.5 | 24.9 | 11.6 | 52.5 | 28.8 | 18.7 | 13.2 | 34.3 |
| H03 | −21.72 | −40.19 | 75 | Shelf | 38.0 | 37.0 | 25.0 | 62.7 | 29.2 | 8.1 | 15.5 | 21.8 |
| H04 | −21.72 | −40.17 | 100 | Shelf | 34.2 | 38.6 | 27.1 | 60.5 | 31.2 | 8.3 | 16.8 | 22.7 |
| H05 | −21.71 | −40.15 | 150 | Shelf | 45.0 | 34.2 | 20.8 | 52.4 | 33.2 | 14.4 | 20.2 | 27.3 |
| H06 | −21.74 | −40.09 | 400 | Upper slope | 46.7 | 35.0 | 18.3 | 47.3 | 37.2 | 15.5 | 18.3 | 34.4 |
| H07 | −21.74 | −40.04 | 700 | Upper slope | 58.3 | 28.6 | 13.1 | 53.2 | 31.7 | 15.1 | 14.6 | 32.1 |
| H10 | −21.62 | −39.60 | 1,900 | Down slope | 75.3 | 18.2 | 6.5 | 47.2 | 24.0 | 28.8 | 7.4 | 45.4 |
| H11 | −21.62 | −39.05 | 2,500 | Down slope | 82.6 | 12.2 | 5.2 | 41.6 | 20.7 | 37.6 | 5.3 | 53.1 |
| I04 | −21.15 | −40.27 | 100 | Shelf | 45.4 | 33.1 | 21.5 | 58.8 | 30.9 | 10.3 | 16.2 | 25.0 |
| I06 | −21.23 | −40.25 | 400 | Upper slope | 54.9 | 30.0 | 15.1 | 55.8 | 30.9 | 13.2 | 16.5 | 27.7 |
| I07 | −21.19 | −40.21 | 700 | Upper slope | 53.6 | 31.1 | 15.3 | 54.3 | 31.7 | 14.0 | 14.8 | 30.9 |
| I08 | −21.19 | −40.15 | 1,000 | Upper slope | 61.2 | 26.7 | 12.1 | 58.2 | 28.4 | 13.4 | 12.9 | 28.9 |
| I09 | −21.19 | −40.05 | 1300 | Upper slope | 63.8 | 25.2 | 11.1 | 53.7 | 28.0 | 18.3 | 20.6 | 25.7 |
| I10 | −21.18 | −39.66 | 1,900 | Down slope | 77.6 | 16.3 | 6.1 | 48.5 | 21.9 | 29.6 | 6.7 | 44.8 |
| I11 | −21.19 | −39.08 | 2,500 | Down slope | 84.9 | 10.2 | 4.9 | 44.3 | 24.4 | 31.3 | 7.2 | 48.6 |
Relative abundance (%) of each group of brGDGT in the surface sediment samples of the Campos Basin.
Data from the two soil samples included in the global soil calibration set were taken from De Jonge et al. (
The tetramethylated brGDGTs (Ia, Ib, and Ic) were the most abundant in most of the samples with an average abundance of 51% (Table 1), followed by the pentamethylated (IIa, IIb, and IIc) with 29%. In the soil samples, the tetramethylated compounds comprised more than 93% of the total brGDGTs (Table 1, De Jonge et al.,
The novel 6-methyl brGDGTs represented 21–68% of the total brGDGTs content (Table 1; Supplementary Table 2). Their relative abundance and the associated IR index exhibited lower values (<30% and <0.6, respectively, Figure 3F) in the inner shelf stations of transects A and B but, on the other hand, higher values (>40% or >0.8) in the down slope stations. The IRpenta presented values slightly lower than IRhexa, with averages of 0.65 and 0.75, respectively (Supplementary Table 1).
The contents of crenarchaeol varied between 21 and 153 μg gTOC−1, with higher values in the Cabo Frio coastal upwelling area and near the Paraíba do Sul River mouth (Figure 3C). The BIT index values ranged from 0.07 to 0.20 with no clear bathymetric gradient. Only the low BIT values from the slope samples of transect A were noticeable (Figure 3D).
CBT' and MBT'5ME Indices
The CBT' values varied between −0.17 and 0.39, resulting in a CBT'-based estimated pH range from 6.9 to 7.8 and an average of 7.3 ± 0.2 (Figure 4A; Supplementary Table 4). The MBT'5ME ranged from 0.70 to 0.93, resulting in MBT'5ME-based MAT varying from 13.6 to 20.8°C (Figure 4B) with an average of 16.3 ± 1.8°C. Both CBT'-based pH and MBT'5ME-based MAT became lower in the inner shelf (<75 m depth) and higher in the slope stations (>400 m depth).
Figure 4

(A) CBT'-derived pH (De Jonge et al.,
Discussion
Sources and Fate of GDGTs in the Marine Environment
The BIT index represents the ratio between the sum of Ia, IIa, and IIIa branched compounds and crenarchaeol, and provides information on soil OM contributions to the marine sediments. The BIT is expected to be near 0 in sediments from the open ocean and near 1 in soils (Hopmans et al.,
A gradient of decreasing concentration in brGDGTs is commonly observed along the river-estuary-coastal ocean continuum (Hopmans et al.,
The relative contributions of acyclic and cyclic compounds showed marked differences along the sedimentary provinces in the margin. The acyclic compounds represented more than 50–60% of the total brGDGTs in most of the samples at all depths in all transects (A, B, G, H, and I; Table 1). Also in Table 1 the two soils from the Paraíba do Sul River drainage basin included in the global calibration of De Jonge et al. (
It is also noteworthy that the contribution of cyclic compounds (one or two rings, i.e., Ib, IIb, IIb', IIIb, IIIb', and Ic, IIc, IIc', IIIc, and IIIc') decreases for the stations from mid to the lower slope (Table 1). This was reflected in the lowering of the index #ringtetra of these deep-water samples (Figure 3E). In the stations from 1,900 to 3,000 m, the acyclic compounds (Ia, Ia', IIa, IIa', IIIa, and IIIa') represented more than 69% of the total brGDGTs. Moreover, the TOC-normalized contents of the acyclic 6-methyl hexamethylated brGDGT (IIIa') were higher in the lower slope stations in all transects (Figure 5; Supplementary Table 3). Similarly increased proportions of acyclic brGDGTs were observed in the anoxic and OM-rich sediments of the Black Sea and Cariaco Basin (Liu et al.,
Figure 5

Contents of acyclic 6-methyl hexamethylated brGDGTs (μg gTOC−1).
The separation and individual quantification of the 5- and 6-methyl brGDGTs provided new insights about the production and sources of autochthonous and allochthonous brGDGTs in aquatic systems (De Jonge et al.,
Figure 6

(A) Distribution of groups using Ward's hierarchical cluster analysis based on the brGDGTs relative abundance. Group 1 is characterized by samples with predominance of tetramethylated and acyclic brGDGTs; group 2 represents the samples with predominance of cyclic over acyclic brGDGTs and the highest #ringstetra; group 3 represents the samples that are more influenced by the riverine input; group 4 represents the lower slope and rise samples (>1,900 m) with predominance of non-cyclic brGDGTs and relevant contribution of 6-methyl hexamethylated compounds. (B) Cross plots of the relative abundance of the 5- and 6-methyl brGDGTs. (C) Ternary diagram of the relative abundance of the tetra-, penta- and hexamethylated brGDGTs. (D) Ternary diagram of the relative abundance of the acyclic and cyclic (with 1 and 2 cyclopentane rings in the structure) brGDGTs.
Applying Ward's hierarchical clustering method (Ward,
Implications for Soil pH and Continental MAT Reconstructions in the Campos Basin Sediments
The brGDGTs in the marine sediments were first assumed to represent an integrated signal of the entire river basin from where the soil brGDGTs derive (Weijers et al.,
The CBT'-based pH (6.9–7.8, Figure 4A) values for all analyzed samples in the Campos Basin were within the same range of the topsoil pH measured along the Paraíba do Sul River drainage basin and along the states of RJ and ES (4.8–8.0, Figure 2E). The same can be observed when comparing the MBT'5ME-based estimated MAT (13.6–20.8°C; Figure 4B) with the MAT of the Paraíba do Sul River drainage basin (10.1–24.1°C, Figure 2B). The estimated pH of 7 for both H1 and H2 samples, the nearest to the Paraíba do Sul River, seems to reflect the soil pH from the lower basin of this river, while the MAT of 16.6°C for these samples agrees more with the upper basin temperatures. The Paraíba do Sul River discharge and the associated transport of terrigenous/riverine materials is marked by a seasonal rainfall regime, with most of the precipitation measured in the summer in the middle-upper lands (Carvalho and Torres,
Conclusions
The highest brGDGTs contents were found near the Paraíba do Sul River outflow, which confirmed this river as the main source of soil brGDGTs to the study region. The BIT seems to be more strongly influenced by the contents of crenarchaeol rather than brGDGTs and no trend from coast to open ocean was observed, which limits the use of brGDGTs as proxy for input of soil organic carbon in the study region.
The spatial heterogeneity observed for our brGDGTs highlights the existence of different sources and post-depositional effects that compromise the use of brGDGTs to reconstruct the soil pH and MAT of the nearby land area. The strong variation in the estimated pH and MAT along the cross-margin transects might be ascribed to the occurrence of two distinct zones of in situ marine production of brGDGTs: the first takes place between 75 and 400 m depth, where the brGDGTs with cyclopentane moieties are more abundant relative to the adjacent areas; and the second occurs on a smaller scale at the down slope region >1,900 m depth, where an increase in the contents of acyclic 6-methyl hexamethylated brGDGTs is observed.
Therefore, our data contribute to the general observation that the application and interpretation of brGDGTs-estimated MAT and soil pH in marine records must consider the limitations of the proxies. Finally, analyses of soil and water samples from the Paraíba do Sul River drainage basin could provide new insights regarding the potential riverine in situ production of brGDGTs in the Paraíba do Sul River.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
MC, RC, AW, and GM contributed conception and design of the study. MC and JH executed chemical analysis and organized the database. MC performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was funded in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. MC thanks the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, grant 142451/2015-0), CAPES (grant PDSE 88881.134877/2016-01), and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, short-term grant 2015/91591964) for her Ph.D. scholarships. RC was supported by research fellowships from CNPq (grant 309347/2017-3) and CAPES (grant 88881.121009/2016-01). The research was partially funded by CNPq (process 402459/2012-1).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank PETROBRAS (Brazilian Petroleum Company) for providing samples under the Habitats project. Our thanks to Ralph Kreutz and Dr. Enno Schefuβ (MARUM, University of Bremen) for assistance with the sediment extractions and to Prof. Carlos Massone for helping with the statistical analysis using software R. We also thank the comments provided by two reviewers which significantly contributed to improve the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2019.00291/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AlbuquerqueA. L. S.BelémA. L.ZuluagaF. J. B.CordeiroL. G. M.MendozaU.KnoppersB. A.et al. (2014). Particle fluxes and bulk geochemical characterization of the Cabo Frio Upwelling System in Southeastern Brazil: sediment trap experiments between spring 2010 and summer 2012. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc.86, 601–619. 10.1590/0001-37652014107212
2
AraujoB. F.HintelmannH.DimockB.AlmeidaM. G.RezendeC. E. (2017). Concentrations and isotope ratios of mercury in sediments from shelf and continental slope at Campos Basin near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Chemosphere178, 42–50. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.056
3
BrandiniF. P.NogueiraM.SimiãoM.CodinaJ. C. U. J.Almeida NoernbergM. (2014). Deep chlorophyll maximum and plankton community response to oceanic bottom intrusions on the continental shelf in the South Brazilian Bight. Cont. Shelf Res.89, 61–75. 10.1016/j.csr.2013.08.002
4
BrandiniF. P.TuraP. M.SantosP. P. G. M. (2018). Ecosystem responses to biogeochemical fronts in the South Brazil Bight. Prog. Oceanogr.164, 52–62. 10.1016/j.pocean.2018.04.012
5
CaladoL.da SilveiraI. C. A.GangopadhyayA.de CastroB. M. (2010). Eddy-induced upwelling off Cape São Tomé (22°S, Brazil). Cont. Shelf Res.30, 1181–1188. 10.1016/j.csr.2010.03.007
6
CamposE. J. D.VelhoteD.SilveiraI. C. A. (2000). Shelf break upwelling driven by Brazil current cyclonic meanders. Geophys. Res. Lett.27, 751–754. 10.1029/1999GL010502
7
CarreiraR. S.AraújoM. P.CostaT. L. F.AnsariN. R.PiresL. C. M. (2010). Lipid biomarkers in deep sea sediments from the Campos Basin, SE Brazilian continental margin. Org. Geochem.41, 879–884. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.04.017
8
CarreiraR. S.CordeiroL. G. M. S.OliveiraD. R. P.BaêtaA.WagenerA. L. R. (2015). Source and distribution of organic matter in sediments in the SE Brazilian continental shelf influenced by river discharges: an approach using stable isotopes and molecular markers. J. Mar. Syst.141, 80–89. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.05.017
9
CarvalhoC.TorresJ. P. M. (2002). “The ecohydrology of the Paraíba do Sul River, Southeast Brazil,” in The Ecohydrology of South America Rivers and Wetlands, ed M. McClain (Wallingford: International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 179–191.
10
CarvalhoC. E. V.SalomãoM. S. M. B.MolisaniM. M.RezendeC. E.LacerdaL. D. (2002). Contribution of a medium-sized tropical river to the particulate heavy-metal load for the South Atlantic Ocean. Sci. Total Environ.284, 85–93. 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00869-5
11
CastelaoR. M.BarthJ. A. (2006). Upwelling around Cabo Frio, Brazil: the importance of wind stress curl. Geophys. Res. Lett.33:L03602. 10.1029/2005GL025182
12
CeccopieriM.CarreiraR. S.WagenerA. L. R.HefterJ. H.MollenhauerG. (2018). On the application of alkenone- and GDGT-based temperature proxies in the south-eastern Brazilian continental margin. Org. Geochem.126, 43–56. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.10.009
13
ChiessiC.M.MulitzaS.GroeneveldJ.SilvaJ. B.CamposM. C.GurgelM. H. C. (2014). Variability of the Brazil current during the late Holocene. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.415, 28–36. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.12.005
14
CordeiroL. G. M. S.BelemA. L.BouloubassiI.RangelB.SifeddineA.CapillaR.et al. (2014). Reconstruction of southwestern Atlantic sea surface temperatures during the last Century: Cabo Frio continental shelf (Brazil). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.415, 225–232. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.01.020
15
CordeiroL. G. M. S.WagenerA. L. R.CarreiraR. S. (2018). Organic matter in sediments of a tropical and upwelling influenced region of the Brazilian continental margin (Campos Basin, Rio de Janeiro). Org. Geochem.120, 86–98. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.01.005
16
DangX.YangH.NaafsB. D. A.PancostR. D.XieS. (2016). Evidence of moisture control on the methylation of branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers in semi-arid and arid soils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta189, 24–36. 10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.004
17
De JongeC.HopmansE. C.StadnitskaiaA.RijpstraW. I. C.HoflandR.TegelaarE.et al. (2013). Identification of novel penta- and hexamethylated branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers in peat using HPLC–MS2, GC–MS and GC–SMB-MS. Org. Geochem.54, 78–82. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.10.004
18
De JongeC.HopmansE. C.ZellC. I.KimJ.-H.SchoutenS.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2014a). Occurrence and abundance of 6-methyl branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers in soils: implications for palaeoclimate reconstruction. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta141, 97–112. 10.1016/j.gca.2014.06.013
19
De JongeC.StadnitskaiaA.CherkashovG.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2016). Branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers and crenarchaeol record post-glacial sea level rise and shift in source of terrigenous brGDGTs in the Kara Sea (Arctic Ocean). Org. Geochem.92, 42–54. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.11.009
20
De JongeC.StadnitskaiaA.HopmansE. C.CherkashovG.FedotovA.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2014b). In situ produced branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers in suspended particulate matter from the Yenisei River, Eastern Siberia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta125, 476–491. 10.1016/j.gca.2013.10.031
21
De JongeC.StadnitskaiaA.HopmansE. C.CherkashovG.FedotovA.StreletskayaI. D.et al. (2015). Drastic changes in the distribution of branched tetraether lipids in suspended matter and sediments from the Yenisei River and Kara Sea (Siberia): implications for the use of brGDGT-based proxies in coastal marine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta165, 200–225. 10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.044
22
de MahiquesM. M.Coaracy WainerI. K.BuroneL.NagaiR.de Mello e SousaS. H.Lopes FigueiraR. C.et al. (2009). A high-resolution Holocene record on the Southern Brazilian shelf: paleoenvironmental implications. Quater. Int.206, 52–61. 10.1016/j.quaint.2008.09.010
23
Dearing Crampton-FloodE.PeterseF.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2019). Production of branched tetraethers in the marine realm: Svalbard fjord sediments revisited. Org. Geochem.138:103907. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2019.103907
24
DittmarT.RezendeC. E.ManeckiM.NiggemannJ.Coelho OvalleA. R.StubbinsA.et al. (2012). Continuous flux of dissolved black carbon from a vanished tropical forest biome. Nat. Geosci.5:618. 10.1038/ngeo1541
25
EvangelistaH.GurgelM.SifeddineA.RigozoN. R.BoussafirM. (2014). South tropical Atlantic anti-phase response to Holocene Bond events. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.415, 21–27. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.07.019
26
FalcãoA. P. C.Curbelo-FernandezM. P.BorgesA. L. N.FilgueirasV. L.KowsmannR. O.MartinsR. P. (2017). “Importância ecológica e econômica da Bacia de Campos: ambiente transicional na margem continental do Oceano Atlântico Sudoeste,” in Ambiente Bentônico: Caracterização Ambiental Regional Da Bacia de Campos, Atlântico Sudoeste, Vol. 3, eds M. P. Curbelo-Fernandez and A. C. Braga (Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; Habitats, 1–13.
27
FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISS-CAS/JRC (2012). Harmonized World Soil Database (Version 1.2). Rome; Laxenburg: FAO; IIASA.
28
FickS.HijmansR. (2017). WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol.37, 4302–4315. 10.1002/joc.5086
29
FietzS.Martínez-GarciaA.HuguetC.RuedaG.Rosell-MeléA. (2011). Constraints in the application of the Branched and Isoprenoid Tetraether index as a terrestrial input proxy. J Geophys. Res. Oceans116:C10032. 10.1029/2011JC007062
30
FigueiredoR.OvalleA.RezendeC.MartinelliL. (2011). Carbon and Nitrogen in the Lower Basin of the Paraíba do Sul River, Southeastern Brazil: element fluxes and biogeochemical processes. Ambiente Água Interdiscipl. J. Appl. Sci.6, 7–37. 10.4136/ambi-agua.183
31
FreymondC. V.PeterseF.FischerL. V.FilipF.GiosanL.EglintonT. I. (2017). Branched GDGT signals in fluvial sediments of the Danube River basin: method comparison and longitudinal evolution. Org. Geochem.103, 88–96. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.11.002
32
Gonzalez-RodriguezE.ValentinJ. L.AndréD. L.JacobS. A. (1992). Upwelling and downwelling at Cabo Frio (Brazil): comparison of biomass and primary production responses. J. Plankton Res.14, 289–306. 10.1093/plankt/14.2.289
33
HerfortL.SchoutenS.BoonJ. P.WolteringM.BaasM.WeijersJ. W. H.et al. (2006). Characterization of transport and deposition of terrestrial organic matter in the southern North Sea using the BIT index. Limnol. Oceanogr.51, 2196–2205. 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2196
34
HopmansE. C.SchoutenS.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2016). The effect of improved chromatography on GDGT-based palaeoproxies. Org. Geochem.93, 1–6. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.12.006
35
HopmansE. C.WeijersJ. W. H.SchefußE.HerfortL.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S.SchoutenS. (2004). A novel proxy for terrestrial organic matter in sediments based on branched and isoprenoid tetraether lipids. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.224, 107–116. 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.012
36
HuJ.MeyersP. A.ChenG.PengP.YangQ. (2012). Archaeal and bacterial glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers in sediments from the Eastern Lau Spreading Center, South Pacific Ocean. Org. Geochem.43, 162–167. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.10.012
37
HuguetC.CartesJ. E.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S.SchoutenS. (2006). Marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids in decapods: implications for the TEX86 paleothermometer. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.7:Q11010. 10.1029/2006GC001305
38
HuguetC.SchimmelmannA.ThunellR.LourensL. J.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S.SchoutenS. (2007). A study of the TEX86 paleothermometer in the water column and sediments of the Santa Barbara Basin, California. Paleoceanography22:PA3203. 10.1029/2006PA001310
39
KimJ.-H.SchoutenS.BuscailR.LudwigW.BonninJ.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S.et al. (2006). Origin and distribution of terrestrial organic matter in the NW Mediterranean (Gulf of Lions): exploring the newly developed BIT index. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.7:Q11017. 10.1029/2006GC001306
40
KimJ. H.SchoutenS.HopmansE. C.DonnerB.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2008). Global sediment core-top calibration of the TEX86 paleothermometer in the ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta72, 1154–1173. 10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.010
41
LacerdaL. D.CarvalhoC. E. V.RezendeC. E.PfeifferW. C. (1993). Mercury in sediments from the Paraíba do Sul River continental shelf, S.E. Brazil. Mar. Pollut. Bull.26, 220–222. 10.1016/0025-326X(93)90626-U
42
LazzariL.WagenerA. L. R.CarreiraR. S.GodoyJ. M. O.CarrascoG.LottC. T.et al. (2018). Climate variability and sea level change during the Holocene: insights from an inorganic multi-proxy approach in the SE Brazilian continental shelf. Quater. Int.508, 125–141. 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.11.011
43
LessaD. V. O.RamosR. P.BarbosaC. F.da SilvaA. R.BelemA.TurcqB.et al. (2014). Planktonic foraminifera in the sediment of a western boundary upwelling system off Cabo Frio, Brazil. Mar. Micropaleontol.106, 55–68. 10.1016/j.marmicro.2013.12.003
44
LessaD. V. O.VenancioI. M.dos SantosT. P.BelemA. L.TurcqB. J.SifeddineA.et al. (2016). Holocene oscillations of Southwest Atlantic shelf circulation based on planktonic foraminifera from an upwelling system (off Cabo Frio, Southeastern Brazil). Holocene26, 1175–1187. 10.1177/0959683616638433
45
LiuX.-L.ZhuC.WakehamS. G.HinrichsK.-U. (2014). In situ production of branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers in anoxic marine water columns. Mar. Chem.166, 1–8. 10.1016/j.marchem.2014.08.008
46
MetzlerP. M.GlibertP. M.GaetaS. A.LudlamJ. M. (1997). New and regenerated production in the South Atlantic off Brazil. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap.44, 363–384. 10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00129-X
47
NaafsB. D. A.InglisG. N.ZhengY.AmesburyM. J.BiesterH.BindlerR.et al. (2017). Introducing global peat-specific temperature and pH calibrations based on brGDGT bacterial lipids. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta208, 285–301. 10.1016/j.gca.2017.01.038
48
NagaiR.MartinsV.BuroneL.WainerI.SousaS.FigueiraR.et al. (2016). In-phase inter-hemispheric changes in two upwelling regions: the Southeast Brazilian and and NW Iberian margins. J. Sediment. Environ.1, 43–67. 10.12957/jse.2016.21463
49
NagaiR. H.SousaS. H. M.BuroneL.MahiquesM. M. (2009). Paleoproductivity changes during the Holocene in the inner shelf of Cabo Frio, southeastern Brazilian continental margin: benthic foraminifera and sedimentological proxies. Quater. Int.206, 62–71. 10.1016/j.quaint.2008.10.014
50
OliveiraD. R. P.CordeiroL. G. M. S.CarreiraR. S. (2013). Characterization of organic matter in cross-margin sediment transects of an upwelling region in the Campos Basin (SW Atlantic, Brazil) using lipid biomarkers. Biogeochemistry112, 311–327. 10.1007/s10533-012-9726-z
51
OvalleA. R. C.SilvaC. F.RezendeC. E.GattsC. E. N.SuzukiM. S.FigueiredoR. O. (2013). Long-term trends in hydrochemistry in the Paraíba do Sul River, southeastern Brazil. J. Hydrol.481, 191–203. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.036
52
PancostR. D.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2003). Carbon isotopic compositions of prokaryotic lipids as tracers of carbon cycling in diverse settings. Chem. Geol.195, 29–58. 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00387-X
53
PeterseF.KimJ.SchoutenS.KlitgaardD.KoçN.SinningheJ. S. (2009). Constraints on the application of the MBT/CBT palaeothermometer at high latitude environments (Svalbard, Norway). Org. Geochem.40, 692–699. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.03.004
54
PeterseF.van der MeerJ.SchoutenS.WeijersJ. W. H.FiererN.JacksonR. B.et al. (2012). Revised calibration of the MBT-CBT paleotemperature proxy based on branched tetraether membrane lipids in surface soils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta96, 215–229. 10.1016/j.gca.2012.08.011
55
PetersonR. G.StrammaL. (1991). Upper level circulation in the South Atlantic Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 26, 1–73. 10.1016/0079-6611(91)90006-8
56
PivelM. A. G.SantarosaA. C. A.ToledoF. A. L.CostaK. B. (2013). The Holocene onset in the southwestern South Atlantic. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.374, 164–172. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.01.014
57
RodriguesR. R.LorenzzettiJ. (2001). A numerical study of the effects of bottom topography and coastline geometry on the Southeast Brazilian coastal upwelling. Cont. Shelf Res.21, 371–394. 10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00094-7
58
RuedaG.Rosell-meléA.EscalaM.GyllencreutzR.BackmanJ. (2009). Comparison of instrumental and GDGT-based estimates of sea surface and air temperatures from the Skagerrak. Org. Geochem.40, 287–291. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.10.012
59
RühlemannC.ButzinM. (2006). Alkenone temperature anomalies in the Brazil-Malvinas confluence area caused by lateral advection of suspended particulate material. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.7:Q10015. 10.1029/2006GC001251
60
SchmidtF.HinrichsK.-U.ElvertM. (2010). Sources, transport, and partitioning of organic matter at a highly dynamic continental margin. Mar. Chem.118, 37–55. 10.1016/j.marchem.2009.10.003
61
SchoutenS.HopmansE. C.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2013). The organic geochemistry of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether lipids: a review. Org. Geochem.54, 19–61. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.09.006
62
SchoutenS.HuguetC.HopmansE. C.KienhuisM. V. M.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2007). Analytical methodology for TEX86 paleothermometry by high-performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.79, 2940–2944. 10.1021/ac062339v
63
SilveiraI. C. A.Foloni NetoH.CostaT. P.SchmidtA. C. K.PereiraA. F.Castro FilhoB. M.et al. (2017). “Physical oceanography of Campos Basin continental slope and ocean region,” in Meteorology and Oceanography: Regional Environmental Characterization of the Campos Basin, Southwest Atlantic, Vol. 2, eds R. P. Martins and G. S. Grossmann-Matheson (Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; Habitats, 135–190.
64
Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity of sources of branched tetraethers in shelf systems: the geochemistry of tetraethers in the Berau River delta (Kalimantan, Indonesia). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta186, 13–31. 10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.033
65
SmithR. W.BianchiT. S.LiX. (2012). A re-evaluation of the use of branched GDGTs as terrestrial biomarkers: implications for the BIT Index. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta80, 14–29. 10.1016/j.gca.2011.11.025
66
SoutoD. D.LessaD. V. O.AlbuquerqueA. L. S.SifeddineA.TurcqB. J.BarbosaC. F. (2011). Marine sediments from southeastern Brazilian continental shelf: a 1200year record of upwelling productivity. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.299, 49–55. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.10.032
67
SouzaT. A.GodoyJ. M.GodoyM. L. D. P.MoreiraI.CarvalhoZ. L.SalomãoM. S. M. B.et al. (2010). Use of multitracers for the study of water mixing in the Paraíba do Sul River estuary. J. Environ. Radioact.101, 564–570. 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.11.001
68
SouzaW. F. L.KnoppersB. A. (2003). Fluxos de água e sedimentos a costa leste do Brasil: relações entre a tipologia e as pressões antrópicas. Geochim. Brasil.17, 57–74. 10.21715/gb.v17i1.198
69
VianaA. R.FaugeresJ. C.KowsmannR. O.LimaJ. A. M.CaddahL. F. G.RizzoJ. G. (1998). Hydrology, morphology and sedimentology of the Campos continental margin, offshore Brazil. Sediment. Geol.115, 133–157. 10.1016/S0037-0738(97)00090-0
70
WalshE. M.IngallsA. E.KeilR. G. (2008). Sources and transport of terrestrial organic matter in Vancouver Island fjords and the Vancouver-Washington Margin: a multiproxy approach using d13Corg, lignin phenols, and the ether lipid BIT index. Limnol. Oceanogr.53, 1054–1063. 10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.1054
71
WardJ. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.58, 236–244. 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
72
WeberY.De JongeC.RijpstraW. I. C.HopmansE. C.StadnitskaiaA.SchubertC. J.et al. (2015). Identification and carbon isotope composition of a novel branched GDGT isomer in lake sediments: evidence for lacustrine branched GDGT production. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta154, 118–129. 10.1016/j.gca.2015.01.032
73
WeijersJ. W. H.SchefußE.KimJ.-H.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S.SchoutenS. (2014). Constraints on the sources of branched tetraether membrane lipids in distal marine sediments. Org. Geochem.72, 14–22. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.04.011
74
WeijersJ. W. H.SchefussE.SchoutenS.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2007a). Coupled thermal and hydrological evolution of tropical africa over the last deglaciation. Science315, 1701–1704. 10.1126/science.1138131
75
WeijersJ. W. H.SchoutenS.HopmansE. C.GeenevasenJ. A. J.DavidO. R. P.ColemanJ. M.et al. (2006a). Membrane lipids of mesophilic anaerobic bacteria thriving in peats have typical archaeal traits. Environ. Microbiol.8, 648–657. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00941.x
76
WeijersJ. W. H.SchoutenS.SpaargarenO. C.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2006b). Occurrence and distribution of tetraether membrane lipids in soils: implications for the use of the TEX86 proxy and the BIT index. Org. Geochem.37, 1680–1693. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.07.018
77
WeijersJ. W. H.SchoutenS.van den DonkerJ. C.HopmansE. C.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2007b). Environmental controls on bacterial tetraether membrane lipid distribution in soils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta71, 703–713. 10.1016/j.gca.2006.10.003
78
WuchterC.SchoutenS.WakehamS. G.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2005). Temporal and spatial variation in tetraether membrane lipids of marine Crenarchaeota in particulate organic matter: implications for TEX86 paleothermometry. Paleoceanography20:PA3013. 10.1029/2004PA001110
79
YoshinagaM.SumidaP.WakehamS. G. (2008). Lipid biomarkers in surface sediments from an unusual coastal upwelling area from the SW Atlantic Ocean. Org. Geochem.39, 1385–1399. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.07.006
80
ZellC.KimJ.-H.AbrilG.SobrinhoR. L.DorhoutD.Moreira-TurcqP.et al. (2013a). Impact of seasonal hydrological variation on the distributions of tetraether lipids along the Amazon River in the central Amazon basin: implications for the MBT/CBT paleothermometer and the BIT index. Front. Microbiol.4:228. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00228
81
ZellC.KimJ.-H.DorhoutD.BaasM.Sinninghe DamstéJ. S. (2015). Sources and distributions of branched tetraether lipids and crenarchaeol along the Portuguese continental margin: implications for the BIT index. Cont. Shelf Res.96, 34–44. 10.1016/j.csr.2015.01.006
82
ZellC.KimJ.-H.FernandesM. J.DorhoutD.FernandesC.BaasM.et al. (2014a). Transport of branched tetraether lipids from the Tagus River basin to the coastal ocean of the Portuguese margin: consequences for the interpretation of the MBT'/CBT paleothermometer. Biogeosci. Discuss.11, 5637–5655. 10.5194/bgd-11-3731-2014
83
ZellC.KimJ.-H.Moreira-TurcqP.AbrilG.HopmansE. C.BonnetM.-P.et al. (2013b). Disentangling the origins of branched tetraether lipids and crenarchaeol in the lower Amazon River: implications for GDGT-based proxies. Limnol. Oceanogr.58, 343–353. 10.4319/lo.2013.58.1.0343
84
ZellC.KimJ. H.HollanderD.LorenzoniL.BakerP.SilvaC.G.et al. (2014b). Sources and distributions of branched and isoprenoid tetraether lipids on the Amazon shelf and fan: implications for the use of GDGT-based proxies in marine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta139, 293–312. 10.1016/j.gca.2014.04.038
85
ZhuC.WeijersJ. W. H.WagnerT.PanJ. M.ChenJ. F.PancostR. D. (2011). Sources and distributions of tetraether lipids in surface sediments across a large river-dominated continental margin. Org. Geochem.42, 376–386. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.02.002
Summary
Keywords
organic matter, terrestrial biomarker, soil pH, MAT, Paraíba do Sul River, Campos Basin, in situ production
Citation
Ceccopieri M, Carreira RS, Wagener ALR, Hefter J and Mollenhauer G (2019) Branched GDGTs as Proxies in Surface Sediments From the South-Eastern Brazilian Continental Margin. Front. Earth Sci. 7:291. doi: 10.3389/feart.2019.00291
Received
26 March 2019
Accepted
22 October 2019
Published
08 November 2019
Volume
7 - 2019
Edited by
Timothy Ferdelman, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology (MPG), Germany
Reviewed by
Francien Peterse, Utrecht University, Netherlands; Xiao-Lei Liu, University of Oklahoma, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2019 Ceccopieri, Carreira, Wagener, Hefter and Mollenhauer.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Milena Ceccopieri milena.ceccopieri@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Biogeoscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.