In the published article, there was an error in the approval number mentioned in the Data availability statement, MU-CIRB 2021/362.1108. The correct Data availability statement appears below.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data analyzed in this study cannot be shared publicly because of the Personal Data Protection Act and is managed by the Institutional Review Board of Mahidol University, which authorized the questionnaire and assigned it the approval number COE No. MU-CIRB 2021/249.2709 only.
In the published article, there was a mistake in the protocol number mentioned in the Ethics statement, MU-CIRB 2021/362.1108. The correct Ethics statement appears below.
Ethics statement
The researcher describes the conditions for data collection and destruction in the questionnaire document, of which participants were informed and consented. Then all participants answering the questionnaire will be invited to participate completely voluntarily. Free from direct and indirect coercion, pressure, motivation, use of language, and speech that honors the participants. Non-infringement of research participants’ rights and being cautious of negative consequences. Furthermore, all consent documentation was provided via questionnaires, and all questions included in the research protocol were revised and approved by the Mahidol University central Institutional Review Board (MU-IRB). In addition, participants worked independently while adhering to strict research protocols. This study was classified as low-risk and exempt from the Mahidol University central Institutional Review Board because it did not record information that could readily identify the subject (direct or indirect/linked). Mahidol University central Institutional Review Board, COE No. MU-CIRB 2021/249.2709.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
sustainable business model, sustainable development goals, interactive qualitative analysis, community engagement, risk management, sustainable production and consumption
Citation
Sukma N and Leelasantitham A (2024) Corrigendum: From conceptual model to conceptual framework: a sustainable business framework for community water supply businesses. Front. Environ. Sci. 12:1367055. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1367055
Received
08 January 2024
Accepted
12 January 2024
Published
19 January 2024
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
12 - 2024
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Sukma and Leelasantitham.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Adisorn Leelasantitham, adisorn.lee@mahidol.ac.th
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.