ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. For. Glob. Change, 11 February 2022

Sec. Forest Growth

Volume 5 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.743039

Distribution of a Foliage Disease Fungus Within Canopies of Mature Douglas-Fir in Western Oregon

  • 1. Department of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States

  • 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Corvallis, OR, United States

Abstract

Nothophaeocryptopus gaeumannii is a common native, endophytic fungus of Douglas-fir foliage, which causes Swiss needle cast, an important foliage disease that is considered a threat to Douglas-fir plantations in Oregon. Disease expression is influenced by fungal fruiting bodies (pseudothecia), which plug the stomata and inhibit gas exchange. Trees are impacted when pseudothecia plug stomates on 1-year-old and older needles resulting in early needle abscission. Mature (100 years+) trees appear to be less impacted from disease, and we hypothesize this is due to the greater emergence of pseudothecia on older than younger needles, which allows for more needle retention. We measured the density of pseudothecia occluding stomates across 2- to 5-year-old needles from upper, middle, and lower canopy positions of mature trees at three sites in the Oregon Coast Range and two sites in the western Oregon Cascade Mountains. Binomial generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to test for the effects of canopy position (upper, middle, and lower), sites, needle age (2–5 years old), and years (2016 and 2017), and their interactions on the pseudothecia density. Pseudothecia density varied annually depending on sites, needle age and canopy positions. Pseudothecia density peaked on 3-, and 4-year-old needles, however, needles emerging from the same year, like 2-year-old needles in 2016 and 3-year-old needles in 2017 both emerged in 2014, had consistently similar patterns of pseudothecia density for both years, across site and canopy positions. Canopy position was important for 3-, and 4-year-old needles, showing less pseudothecia in the lower canopy. This research confirms that N. gaeumannii pseudothecia density is greatest in 3- and 4-year old needles in mature trees in contrast to plantations where pseudothecia density usually peaks on 2-year-old needles, and that pseudothecia density (disease severity) is generally lower in mature trees. Something about mature forest canopies and foliage appears to increase the time it takes for pseudothecia to emerge from the needles, in contrast to younger plantations, thus allowing the mature trees to have greater needle retention.

Introduction

Nothophaeocryptopus gaeumannii is a common native, endophytic fungus which occurs only in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) foliage (). The fungus can cause a foliage disease known as Swiss needle cast, which is currently defoliating and decreasing growth of Douglas-fir along the Pacific Coast in Oregon, Washington, and SW British Columbia (; ). Disease is caused when the fruiting bodies of the fungus, known as pseudothecia (Figure 1), emerge from and plug the stomates which causes reduced gas exchange and carbon starvation (). This fungus may be unusual for a pathogen in that newly emerged needles are the predominant substrate for new infection by ascospores (; ) and colonization within needles is exclusively intercellular and non-lethal to cells (). Swiss needle cast induced reductions in tree growth of coastal Douglas-fir stands vary in space and time depending upon elevation, aspect, proximity to the coast, and site conditions and primary environmental factors influencing the degree of pathogen dynamics (; ). Evidence from dendrochronological studies indicate that Swiss needle cast impacts in Oregon were least severe in the first half of the 20th century and increased in frequency, severity and range after ∼1980 due to increasing winter temperature associated with climate change (; , ). The Swiss needle cast epidemic in the most recent decades is a primary economic and ecological concern to the timber industry in the Pacific Northwest because disease severity is greater in young coastal Douglas-fir plantations than in mature stands but reasons for this remains elusive (; ). Coastal young Douglas-fir trees typically retain up to 4 years of needles but may have only current and 1-year-old foliage in severely infected plantations (; ; ) due to early needle abscission when between 25 and 50% of the stomates are occluded (; ; ). Anecdotal evidence from epidemiological studies suggest needle retention appears to drive the growth impacts on the tree, with foliage retention of only 2 years causing a reduction in growth of about 30% (, ; ). Needle retention and fungal fruiting body presence and abundance on 1- and 2-year-old foliage have routinely been used as indices of disease severity in Douglas-fir plantations (; ; ). However, disease severity on 2-year-old needles may be misleading for mature Douglas-fir trees which typically have greater needle retention of more than 5 years () and lesser frequency and magnitude of growth losses ().

FIGURE 1

Recent epidemiological evidence suggests that disease severity, as measured by incidence times the percentage of pseudothecia occluding stomates (), is greatest in 2-year-old needles for young trees, and 3–5 year-old needles for older trees (). The reason for this difference remains elusive, as foliar nitrogen and leaf wetness did not explain the difference. The reason mature trees have greater foliage retention, and are healthier, may be influenced by the timing of pseudothecia emergence. While there is considerable epidemiological evidence of disease severity for young Douglas-fir plantations in coastal Oregon and Washington (, ), the data and knowledge gaps of disease severity for mature Douglas-fir are large due primarily to comparably few epidemiological studies on mature Douglas-fir and scaling issues from sampling only 2-year-old needles for measuring incidence.

This manuscript extends our previous epidemiological study () to examine the differences in disease severity between needle age classes and canopy position of mature Douglas-fir trees based on within-leaf measurements of the density of pseudothecia occluding stomates. There is no published data on pseudothecia density of multiple needle age classes in mature trees. found a greater percentage of 3–5 year-old needles of mature Douglas-fir were infected by the presence of pseudothecia than younger needles, but the amount of stomata occluded by pseudothecia on infected needles (i.e., pseudothecia density) was not measured. Consequently, the pathogenicity of N. gaeumannii and epidemiology of mature trees are still not very clear. Because the physiological effects of SNC (impaired CO2 uptake and photosynthesis) are associated with the physical blockage of stomata, the density of pseudothecia occluding stomates is a relevant response variable for assessing disease severity across needle age classes and canopy positions of mature trees. We hypothesized that disease severity is less in mature trees because the time since initial infection to the emergence of pseudothecia is longer for mature than young trees. Within the mature tree crowns, we also explored whether pseudothecia density varied with needle age, canopy position, and site. We believe that this analysis provides important insight into spatial and temporal dynamics of Swiss needle cast disease progression in mature tree canopies. Also, filling a data gap of the differences in mature and young trees can lead to a better understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of this important foliage disease.

Materials and Methods

Study Sites

We sampled the same mature trees from five of the seven sites in western Oregon that were included in the study by ; three sites were in the long-term ecological monitoring plot (LTEM) system established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (hereafter EPA; ; ) and two sites were not part of the LTEM system. Moose Mountain and Falls Creek are located on the west slope of the Cascade Range in the Willamette National Forest, and Cascade Head, Woods Creek, and Klickitat Mountain are in the Siuslaw National Forest in the Coast Range (Figure 2). The forests were unmanaged mature stands of Douglas-fir that were 120–150 years old and ranged in height from 55 to 70 m. Elevation of sites varied from 140 to 670 m. Annual precipitation varied from 1700–2500 mm. Associated tree species included western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and western red cedar (Thuja plicata), in Cascade Head Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) is also associated. Monthly precipitation and mean temperature data from 2010 to 2017 at all sites were downloaded from PRISM at Oregon State University1 by providing GPS coordinates. We use average winter mean temperature (December, January, and February) and average summer precipitation (May, June and July), the climatological variables that are associated with Swiss needle cast severity (), to compare the weather conditions across the sites (Figure 3).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 3

Field Sampling

Branch samples were collected on the south side of each tree in late May through early June in 2016 and 2017, after bud-break and before new branchlets were elongated. The May–June period is also optimal for sampling because N. gaeumannii asci mature during April–June in western Oregon and sporulation occurs mid-May to July (; ; ). We collected 1–3 branches from three canopy positions (lower, middle, and upper crown) in each of three trees at each site (total number of trees = 15). At least one branch > 1 m in length was selected to ensure sufficient needle material for measurements. Several shorter branches were chosen if there were no branches greater than 1 m in length. Branches were transported to the lab and stored in a 5°C cold room. Three young trees (20 – 30 years old) next to the mature trees at each site were sampled at the same time by and data are used here for comparison to older stands.

Lab Analysis

For each canopy position of 15 mature trees, 50 individual needles were randomly selected from the cohort of each foliar age class and needles were taped on an index card and stored at −20°C. All needle age classes from 2 to 6 years old were examined for N. gaeumannii pseudothecia incidence and density. The pseudothecia incidence is defined as the percentage of the 50 needles with pseudothecia present. Pseudothecia density was determined by selecting the first 10 needles with pseudothecia present beginning at the top of the card and working down, and then counting the percent of stomates occluded in three regions (base, middle, and tip) of the needle (). The entire length of the needle was evenly divided into three regions, for each region we picked a starting point using a random number table, and examined 100 contiguous stomates from the starting point to determine the number that were occluded by pseudothecia. Pseudothecial occlusion in the three regions was then averaged for each needle and then averaged for 10 needles per canopy position per tree.

Disease severity is typically determined by multiplying the incidence times the density of stomates blocked by pseudothecia for 2-year-old needles (; ; ). Disease severity is an important metric used to compare disease importance in forest stands (), while density alone is most important in casting of individual needles (; ; ). The 2-year-old foliage is the key age class in coastal forests but foliage retention of severely diseased trees can be less than 2 years (). Where disease severity is lower, pseudothecia can take as long as 4 years to mature when environmental conditions are less favorable for fungal growth (). In this study, we measured density of stomates plugged with pseudothecia for needles aged 2–5 years and included incidence data from . We used the pseudothecia occlusion density rather than incidence as the primary measure of disease expression because there were many incidence values at or near zero.

Statistical Analysis

Binomial generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to test for effects of canopy positions (upper, middle, and lower), sites, needle ages (2–5 years old), years (2016 and 2017), and their interactions on the pseudothecia density at the 0.05 level of significance. In the GLMM, canopy position, site, and needle age were treated as fixed effects with interaction terms in the GLMM whereas year was treated as an additive fixed effect, the individual trees on the same site were treated as random effects. We first ran the GLMM by using only 2-year-old needles of mature and young trees, to confirm the statistical differences of pseudothecia incidence and density between mature and young trees. We analyzed pseudothecia incidence and density ratios (0–1) using binomial GLMM assuming a logit-linear model with four fixed factors and one random factor for individual trees.

To understand more deeply about pseudothecia density on mature trees, we first ran the GLMM by using the complete dataset. In the preliminary results, there were interactions involving canopy positions, sites, and needle age, so we also ran the GLMM by year and by needle age, to test for differences in pseudothecia density on canopy position and site separately. We conducted a Bonferroni mean separation test to infer which treatment means were different. GLMM tests were performed using R (v. 4.0.2, ) and package dplyr (), emmeans (), ggplot2 (), nlme (), glmmTMB (), and multcomp ().

Results

Mature Douglas-fir trees were less severely infected by N. gaeumannii than nearby young Douglas-fir trees (10–20 years old) based on examination of pseudothecia incidence and density for 2-year-old needles (Table 1). The mean percentage of 2-year-old needles with pseudothecia present, or incidence, ranged from 1.3 to 98% across sites and years for mature Douglas-fir trees, compared with 44 to 100% for the young plantations (Table 2). Tree age differences (i.e., mature vs. young trees) in pseudothecia incidence and density for 2-year-old needles were highly significant at the 0.05 level of significance (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001 respectively, Table 1). To a lesser extent, site and canopy position effects and their interactions on incidence and density for 2-year-old needles were also significant at the 0.05 level of significance based on the binomial GLMM, however, year effect was significant only in pseudothecia incidence but not density (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Density
Incidence
EstimatesSEz valuep valueEstimatesSEz valuep value
(Intercept)–2.490.24–10.56<0.001***2.180.484.51<0.001***
treeageYoung1.020.293.49<0.001***2.220.952.330.020*
canopyMiddle–0.670.36–1.860.063.1.870.642.910.004**
canopyLower–1.590.49–3.200.001**0.000.370.001.000
siteKlickitat Mt–0.800.40–2.000.046*–2.950.66–4.50<0.001***
siteWoods Creek–1.000.42–2.370.018*–6.550.95–6.89<0.001***
siteFalls Creek–2.480.74–3.370.001***–5.470.76–7.22<0.001***
siteMoose Mt–1.890.58–3.280.001**–3.880.67–5.81<0.001***
year20170.190.290.640.5231.150.492.320.021*
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle0.250.430.580.559–1.571.26–1.250.213
treeageYoung:canopyLower0.340.570.600.5500.291.150.250.800
treeageYoung:siteKlickitat Mt0.040.490.080.9391.991.211.640.101
treeageYoung:siteWoods Creek0.870.491.760.078.4.011.342.990.003**
treeageYoung:siteFalls Creek1.500.791.900.057.4.901.313.75<0.001***
treeageYoung:siteMoose Mt0.850.651.320.1862.581.182.180.029*
canopyMiddle:siteKlickitat Mt–0.530.72–0.730.465–2.440.70–3.49<0.001***
canopyLower:siteKlickitat Mt–0.050.89–0.060.952–0.880.47–1.870.061.
canopyMiddle:siteWoods Creek–2.651.80–1.470.141–1.451.12–1.290.196
canopyLower:siteWoods Creek1.620.692.370.018*1.290.891.450.148
canopyMiddle:siteFalls Creek0.361.120.320.749–1.320.83–1.590.113
canopyLower:siteFalls Creek1.851.041.770.077.1.270.612.070.038*
canopyMiddle:siteMoose Mt0.250.900.280.778–1.350.71–1.910.057.
canopyLower:siteMoose Mt0.491.140.430.6650.480.481.010.312
treeageYoung:year20170.330.350.930.351–0.851.20–0.710.475
canopyMiddle:year20170.250.480.530.599–0.731.05–0.700.485
canopyLower:year20170.680.611.110.2670.190.720.270.791
siteKlickitat Mt:year2017–0.450.61–0.740.457–1.920.62–3.080.002**
siteWoods Creek:year2017–3.511.79–1.960.050*–1.151.12–1.020.308
siteFalls Creek:year2017–0.020.98–0.020.986–1.710.84–2.020.044*
siteMoose Mt:year2017–0.570.86–0.660.507–2.920.70–4.18<0.001***
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:siteKlickitat Mt0.430.820.520.6011.891.421.330.183
treeageYoung:canopyLower:siteKlickitat Mt0.710.990.720.4720.411.330.310.757
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:siteWoods Creek3.541.831.940.053.3.761.732.170.030*
treeageYoung:canopyLower:siteWoods Creek–0.090.77–0.120.9071.311.650.800.425
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:siteFalls Creek0.161.180.140.8911.891.691.120.262
treeageYoung:canopyLower:siteFalls Creek–0.801.13–0.710.478–1.401.48–0.950.345
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:siteMoose Mt0.440.970.460.6472.521.461.730.084.
treeageYoung:canopyLower:siteMoose Mt0.841.210.700.4861.111.420.780.434
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:year2017–0.660.57–1.160.2460.441.910.230.818
treeageYoung:canopyLower:year2017–0.580.71–0.820.414–0.481.75–0.280.782
treeageYoung:siteKlickitat Mt:year2017–1.370.75–1.830.067.0.701.360.510.609
treeageYoung:siteWoods Creek:year20171.741.830.950.340–1.921.59–1.210.227
treeageYoung:siteFalls Creek:year2017–0.371.04–0.350.7231.151.560.740.458
treeageYoung:siteMoose Mt:year2017–0.930.97–0.960.3380.091.350.070.947
canopyMiddle:siteKlickitat Mt:year2017–0.151.15–0.130.8991.971.161.700.089.
canopyLower:siteKlickitat Mt:year2017–1.491.76–0.850.397–0.821.03–0.800.421
canopyMiddle:siteWoods Creek:year2017–12.373909.490.000.9970.731.670.440.662
canopyLower:siteWoods Creek:year2017–0.722.57–0.280.781–0.911.41–0.650.517
canopyMiddle:siteFalls Creek:year2017–2.652.79–0.950.3410.651.370.480.632
canopyLower:siteFalls Creek:year2017–2.561.90–1.340.179–1.461.16–1.260.209
canopyMiddle:siteMoose Mt:year20171.081.200.900.371–0.831.37–0.610.544
canopyLower:siteMoose Mt:year20170.311.500.210.835–1.301.07–1.220.224
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:siteKlickitat Mt:year20170.041.400.030.977–2.042.09–0.980.329
treeageYoung:canopyLower:siteKlickitat Mt:year20171.741.900.920.3600.302.020.150.880
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:siteWoods Creek:year201711.943909.490.000.998–2.082.44–0.850.393
treeageYoung:canopyLower:siteWoods Creek:year20170.162.630.060.951–0.652.30–0.280.779
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:siteFalls Creek:year20172.522.840.890.374–0.402.47–0.160.873
treeageYoung:canopyLower:siteFalls Creek:year20171.542.000.770.4401.062.210.480.633
treeageYoung:canopyMiddle:siteMoose Mt:year2017–0.811.36–0.600.5500.072.220.030.975
treeageYoung:canopyLower:siteMoose Mt:year2017–0.471.64–0.290.7760.862.090.410.681

Summary of GLMM of pseudothecia incidence and density, across five study sites (15 trees) in western Oregon, tree age (mature or young trees), year, canopy positions and their interactions.

Only 2-year-old needles were used. Asterisks indicate significance at the 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), and 0.001 (***) levels. Estimates are based on a logit transformation.

TABLE 2

SitesYoung plantation 2 year
Mature 2 year
Mature 3 year
Mature 4 year
Mature 5 year
Mature 6 year
201620172016201720162017201620172016201720162017
Incidence
Cascade Head99.78 ± 0.22100 ± 091.78 ± 2.3297.78 ± 1.3186.4 ± 9.2793.11 ± 5.4377.96 ± 3.7990.01 ± 7.2681.57 ± 7.9797.22 ± 2.7884.51 ± 1.3585.71 ± 14.29
Klickitat Mountain96.22 ± 1.6185.78 ± 4.0626.44 ± 7.3910 ± 5.3669.78 ± 7.0341.12 ± 9.339.18 ± 6.9650.19 ± 10.1526.59 ± 12.5534.65 ± 8.8215.53 ± 7.9928.04 ± 11.67
Woods Creek94.89 ± 3.2744.44 ± 8.072.22 ± 0.911.33 ± 0.5830.22 ± 7.688.44 ± 2.8433.78 ± 5.9722.44 ± 4.718.12 ± 1.6427.78 ± 4.29.33 ± 3.256.29 ± 2.29
Moose Mountain96.89 ± 1.5768.67 ± 9.8822.44 ± 6.971.78 ± 0.9154.89 ± 13.9634.44 ± 10.9452.51 ± 12.4140 ± 12.4151.59 ± 14.2534.79 ± 11.0639.5 ± 19.1933.5 ± 12.82
Falls Creek98.89 ± 0.5997.33 ± 1.157.78 ± 2.32.44 ± 0.8762.67 ± 10.3938 ± 7.2651.95 ± 6.9765.79 ± 10.7256.57 ± 8.2151.66 ± 9.0856.16 ± 12.1453.64 ± 11.65
Density
Cascade Head12.82 ± 1.8417.89 ± 3.084.56 ± 1.036.51 ± 1.347.52 ± 0.916.28 ± 0.76.63 ± 1.096.4 ± 0.887.36 ± 1.084.12 ± 0.579.33 ± 2.486.1 ± 0.7
Klickitat Mountain6.22 ± 0.732.07 ± 0.381.84 ± 0.51.16 ± 0.522.04 ± 0.682.02 ± 0.472.68 ± 0.683.06 ± 1.182.36 ± 0.464.05 ± 1.961.42 ± 0.572.44 ± 1.42
Woods Creek20.82 ± 2.074.65 ± 1.092.07 ± 1.140.07 ± 0.057.78 ± 2.411.59 ± 0.818.41 ± 1.786.94 ± 0.876.91 ± 1.65.7 ± 0.94.44 ± 1.242.72 ± 1.22
Moose Mountain8.63 ± 1.183.18 ± 0.440.84 ± 0.151.25 ± 0.733.9 ± 0.74.51 ± 1.493.2 ± 0.738.82 ± 1.493.27 ± 1.076.63 ± 2.172.14 ± 0.514.07 ± 1.07
Falls Creek7.93 ± 0.976.15 ± 1.750.71 ± 0.130.35 ± 0.278.55 ± 2.082.69 ± 0.585.54 ± 1.696.89 ± 1.363.98 ± 0.483.46 ± 1.053.95 ± 0.793.51 ± 0.89

Disease incidence (%) and pseudothecia density (%) of 2-year old needles of young plantations (data used to determine disease severity in ) and 2–6 year age classes on mature trees (n = 15).

Pseudothecia incidence was uniformly high for all needle classes of mature trees at Cascade Head where disease severity was greatest. For less severely diseased stands of mature trees, incidence varied by needle age class and peaked for 3- and 4-year old needles rather than for 2-year-old needles. The mean percentage of occluded stomates on 2-year-old needles with pseudothecia present, or pseudothecia density, ranged from 0.1 to 6.5% for mature trees in comparison to a range of 2–21% for young plantations. The highest pseudothecia density recorded for mature trees were: Cascade Head 9.3% for 6-year-old needles, Klickitat Mountain 4.0% for 5-year, Woods Creek 8.4% for 4-year, Moose Mountain 8.8% for 4-year, and Falls Creek 8.6% for 3-year old needles (Table 2). Because of the limited sample size in this study, the variation of pseudothecia density and incidence between tree to tree could be large (Table 2).

Disease severity (incidence times density) was consistently greater for 2-year-old needles of young plantation trees than for 2–5 years old needles of mature trees (Figure 4). Disease severity was greatest for 3- and 4-year old needles of mature trees, although 5-year-old needles were similar to 4-year old needles at Cascade Head and Moose Mountain.

FIGURE 4

Within Crown and Site Patterns of Mature Trees

Pseudothecia density varied by canopy position, site, and year depending upon needle age class (Figures 5, 6 and Table 3). Site differences in pseudothecia density of 2-year-old needles were statistically significant at the 0.05 level, with greater pseudothecia density at the Cascade Head site than the inland sites (Figures 4, 5). Canopy position differences in pseudothecia density of 3- and 4-year-old needles were statistically significant at the 0.05 level, with greater pseudothecia density in the upper canopy than in the lower canopy (Figure 6).

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

TABLE 3

EstimateSEz valuep value
(Intercept)–2.320.26–8.88<0.001***
canopyMiddle–0.530.23–2.250.024*
canopyLower–1.160.29–4.07<0.001***
needleage3 year–0.060.21–0.310.759
needleage4 year–0.430.24–1.780.075.
needleage5 year–0.200.28–0.720.473
siteKlickitat Mt–0.990.42–2.370.018*
siteWoods Creek–1.790.47–3.80<0.001***
siteFalls Creek–2.500.58–4.33<0.001***
siteMoose Mt–2.350.52–4.48<0.001***
year2017–0.140.06–2.620.009**
canopyMiddle:needleage3 year0.450.321.410.159
canopyLower:needleage3 year0.690.371.840.065.
canopyMiddle:needleage4 year0.920.342.710.007**
canopyLower:needleage4 year1.140.392.920.004**
canopyMiddle:needleage5 year0.410.371.110.265
canopyLower:needleage5 year0.730.421.730.084.
canopyMiddle:siteKlickitat Mt–0.630.55–1.140.253
canopyLower:siteKlickitat Mt–0.680.72–0.950.341
canopyMiddle:siteWoods Creek–2.821.78–1.590.113
canopyLower:siteWoods Creek1.200.542.210.027*
canopyMiddle:siteFalls Creek–0.470.93–0.500.615
canopyLower:siteFalls Creek0.810.781.040.301
canopyMiddle:siteMoose Mt0.860.571.500.133
canopyLower:siteMoose Mt0.590.720.820.412
needleage3 year:siteKlickitat Mt0.180.400.440.663
needleage4 year:siteKlickitat Mt0.420.430.970.332
needleage5 year:siteKlickitat Mt–0.460.62–0.730.465
needleage3 year:siteWoods Creek1.560.423.67<0.001***
needleage4 year:siteWoods Creek2.490.435.79<0.001***
needleage5 year:siteWoods Creek1.930.464.23<0.001***
needleage3 year:siteFalls Creek2.670.535.02<0.001***
needleage4 year:siteFalls Creek3.020.555.52<0.001***
needleage5 year:siteFalls Creek2.030.593.46<0.001***
needleage3 year:siteMoose Mt1.810.483.74<0.001***
needleage4 year:siteMoose Mt2.610.505.22<0.001***
needleage5 year:siteMoose Mt1.920.553.48<0.001***
canopyMiddle:needleage3 year:siteKlickitat Mt–0.300.75–0.400.692
canopyLower:needleage3 year:siteKlickitat Mt–0.130.91–0.150.883
canopyMiddle:needleage4 year:siteKlickitat Mt–0.070.72–0.100.918
canopyLower:needleage4 year:siteKlickitat Mt–0.090.89–0.110.916
canopyMiddle:needleage5 year:siteKlickitat Mt1.120.851.320.186
canopyLower:needleage5 year:siteKlickitat Mt1.220.991.230.220
canopyMiddle:needleage3 year:siteWoods Creek2.631.811.450.147
canopyLower:needleage3 year:siteWoods Creek–1.760.67–2.620.009**
canopyMiddle:needleage4 year:siteWoods Creek2.031.811.120.262
canopyLower:needleage4 year:siteWoods Creek–2.160.65–3.31<0.001***
canopyMiddle:needleage5 year:siteWoods Creek2.691.821.480.138
canopyLower:needleage5 year:siteWoods Creek–1.460.68–2.150.031*
canopyMiddle:needleage3 year:siteFalls Creek–0.270.98–0.270.785
canopyLower:needleage3 year:siteFalls Creek–1.550.86–1.800.072.
canopyMiddle:needleage4 year:siteFalls Creek–0.490.99–0.500.620
canopyLower:needleage4 year:siteFalls Creek–1.710.86–1.980.048*
canopyMiddle:needleage5 year:siteFalls Creek0.401.020.400.693
canopyLower:needleage5 year:siteFalls Creek–0.820.90–0.900.366
canopyMiddle:needleage3 year:siteMoose Mt–1.150.67–1.720.086.
canopyLower:needleage3 year:siteMoose Mt–0.850.82–1.040.299
canopyMiddle:needleage4 year:siteMoose Mt–1.510.67–2.260.024*
canopyLower:needleage4 year:siteMoose Mt–1.210.81–1.490.137
canopyMiddle:needleage5 year:siteMoose Mt–1.140.74–1.540.123
canopyLower:needleage5 year:siteMoose Mt0.100.840.120.904

Summary of GLMM of pseudothecia density across five study sites (15 trees) in western Oregon, needle age (2–5-year-old), year, canopy position and their interactions.

Asterisks indicate significance at the 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), and 0.001 (***) levels. Estimates are based on a logit transformation.

Site differences in pseudothecia density were statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance (Table 3), indicating that temporal and spatial variability might exist in response to local weather variability. Only current year foliage is infected by N. gaeumannii, and variability of weather during the year foliage emerges can influence infection success (). Year-to-year variation in temperature in winter and rainfall in summer is common (Figure 3). Pseudothecia density of 2-year-old needles was greatest at Cascade Head, notably in 2017, whereas that of 4-year-old needles in 2016 was greatest at Woods Creek (Figure 5 and Table 2). Pseudothecia density peaked in either 2- or 3-year-old needles at Cascade Head and 3- or 4-year-old needles at the inland sites depending upon year (Figure 5).

Canopy position differences were statistically significant at the 0.05 level (Table 3). Needles from upper canopy position had significantly higher pseudothecia density than the needles from middle (p = 0.024, Table 3) and lower canopies (p < 0.001, Table 3). In addition, these trends in canopy position also persisted over time for needles that emerged from the same year. For example, the canopy position trends in 2-year-old needles in 2016 was similar to the canopy position trends in 3-year-old needles in 2017, which they both emerged from 2014. The canopy position trends are particular for the 2- and 3-year old needles in 2016. In contrast, the canopy position trends in 3-year-old needles in 2016 did not persist in 4-year-old needles in 2017 due, in part, to a combination of pseudothecia density in the upper canopy peaking in 2016 followed by greater needle abscission in 2017 (Figure 6). The needle cohorts that emerged from the same year had similar trends among sites, implying a weather effect.

Discussion

Swiss needle cast is an important disease of plantation Douglas-fir along the coast, yet mature stands are apparently not currently severely infected except in limited areas such as Tillamook, Oregon (). Older trees have lower disease severity on 2-year-old needles () and older stands rarely show up in Swiss needle cast aerial detection surveys (). In this study, pseudothecia density, as well as disease severity, peaks on 3-, and 4-year-old needle age classes in mature Douglas-fir trees (Figure 4). This is consistent with previous findings that pseudothecia incidence peaks on 3-year or older needles for mature Douglas-fir (). Pseudothecia density is also very low across all our mature tree samples compared to young tree 2-year-old needles, with density never exceeding 10% for any needle age class (Table 2). states that carbon assimilation decreases proportionally with increasing stomate occlusion, while suggest leaves are cast above 50% occlusion and suggest casting with as low as 25% stomate occlusion. Therefore, it is likely that the levels of stomate occlusion found in older trees do not influence needle function as strongly as in younger trees, although we did not test this.

The combination of lower pseudothecia density and the emergence of pseudothecia on 3- or 4-year-old needles, rather than 2-year-old needle age class, is potentially the key difference between Swiss needle cast disease expression in young and mature Douglas-fir. This supports our hypothesis, that the reason mature stands do not typically suffer from disease caused by N. gaeumannii is because needle retention is typically above 3 years (). The lower pseudothecia density on mature trees also makes needle casting due to disease less likely in mature needles.

Why Do Pseudothecia Emerge on Older Needles in Mature Forests?

The factors that control timing of pseudothecia emergence from needles are not well understood, yet they may be critical to explaining disease epidemiology because the N. gaeumannii is an endophyte that appears to only impact leaves when pseudothecia emerge and block gas exchange (, ). has shown that winter temperature may explain timing of pseudothecial development, while showed that leaf wetness and leaf nitrogen do not explain differences in Swiss needle cast disease severity using 2-year-old needles of young and mature trees. Evidence from dendrochronological studies suggest winter temperature is strongly associated with disease impact at wetter, cooler sites while summer conditions are more important at less humid, warmer sites (). In 2015, the PNW experienced the warmest winter on record with winter temperatures 3.4°C above historical average (). The anomalously warm winter of 2015 likely contributed to the high disease severity at the coast site while below-average spring and summer precipitation and above-average summer temperatures in 2015 likely decreased pseudothecia incidence and density at inland sites outside of the coastal fog zone (, ).

What Factors Could Control Timing of Pseudothecia Emergence?

Although we did not specifically test why pseudothecia emerge on older needles of mature trees, canopy architecture is distinct between young plantations and mature tree crowns. The mature trees are taller, with longer vertical foliage distribution and more complex microclimatic variation (). Leaf temperature in winter may be reduced in mature trees compared to younger stands due to age differences in canopy height and architecture, and this could slow the development of pseudothecia production (). Spore dispersal could also be different within older forest stands with complex crowns compared to even-structured young stands where canopy connectivity and homogeneity may allow for better colonization of needles. Other factors that might influence pseudothecia development time could be related to differences in leaf structure or chemistry between young and mature trees ().

Patterns Within Mature Tree Crowns

We found that N. gaeumannii pseudothecia density varies year to year depending on needle age and canopy position in mature Douglas-fir of western Oregon. Needles emerging from the same year, for example, 2-year-old needles in 2016 and 3-year-old needles in 2017 both emerged in 2014, have similar patterns of pseudothecia density across needle ages which likely relates to differences in weather during the year that needles are infected (Figure 5). Nothophaeocryptopus gaeumannii only infects the current-year needles from May–August when pseudothecia disperse spores () and leaf wetness is important for fungal colonization (). The weather during these months may cause the similar pseudothecia occlusion for the same-year needle cohorts due to similarities in weather-driven fungal colonization. The site effect was important for 2-year-old needles in our study, with highest pseudothecia densities at the Cascade Head site, but site was also important for 3- and 4-year-old needles. Distance from coast is important to Swiss needle cast disease severity and needle retention in young stands, with Swiss needle cast impacts greater at lower elevation areas and closer to coast (; ; ; , ; ).

Disease severity and pseudothecial density measured on 2-year-old needles is highest in the upper crowns of plantation-grown Douglas-fir compared to middle and lower crown positions (; ; ; ; ). Our pseudothecia density data across older needles is generally consistent with Douglas-fir crown vertical patterns for 2-year-old needles in plantations. The lower canopy position had consistently lowest density of pseudothecia for all needle age classes (Figure 6 and Table 3), while the upper canopy had the highest density, except the mid canopy of 4-year old needles in 2017.

Foliage diseases are generally thought to be most impactful in the highest humidity regions of a tree crown, which is typically the lower and inner crown (; ). In Christmas tree plantation settings in Pennsylvania and western Washington, N. gaeumannii was most severe in the lower and inner portion of the tree crown (; ). However, in western Oregon, disease severity of N. gaeumannii is consistently greatest in the upper crown for plantation trees (; ; ), while the mid- and upper crown of mature trees show greater pseudothecia density in our study. This implies that environmental conditions for the fungus are more favorable in the mid and upper crown of mature trees, consistent with younger trees in western Oregon forests. analyzed the 22-year mean May through September low cloudiness (i.e., stratus, stratocumulus, and fog) and found a strong decline of low clouds in May and June, and a peak in July in the terrestrial highlands mode (Moose Mt. and Falls Creek). Seasonally, coastal fog frequency increases to a peak in August and is highest from June to September (). The coastal summer fog maintains needle wetness during the period of low summer precipitation and high summer temperatures. The coastal mode (Cascade Head, Klickitat Mt. and Woods Creek) had consistent low cloudiness that also peaked in late summer. The fog may wet the upper and mid crowns of co-dominant and dominant trees more than the lower canopy, and help explain canopy differences of N. gaeumannii density, although leaf wetness was not consistently higher on upper canopy foliage ().

In western Oregon, winter temperature influences disease severity at a range of spatial and temporal scales (; ,; ; , ; ). Leaf canopy temperature may be a key predictor of variations in N. gaeumannii density within the canopy of mature Douglas-fir. A wide range of biological responses from leaf photosynthesis () to net ecosystem exchange () are better predicted by leaf temperature than air temperature. Several thermal imaging and radiation absorption modeling studies show leaf temperature is higher in the upper crown than in the lower crown and understory (; ) due to more direct daytime solar irradiation at the treetop than at the bottom of the canopy (). The gradients in leaf canopy temperature are most likely an important factor for fungal development, notably in the cool winter months when temperatures are most limiting to the formation of pseudothecia. In coastal Oregon, pseudothecial primordia form in epistomatal chambers October to April following initial infection in the summer months (). Pseudothecia density was generally low (< 10%) for all needle age classes in mature trees, implying less colonization of the needles or slower growth within the needles. have demonstrated that pseudothecia density is significantly correlated with quantitative PCR, or the abundance of fungi within the needle. Therefore, other factors may be influencing colonization success of needles in mature trees. Although more recently, contend that there is not a clear relationship between pseudothecia density, fungal DNA load and needle retention. They propose that there is a more complex unknown pathology involved in needle loss.

Conclusion

Nothophaeocryptopus gaeumannii causes disease in plantation and forest trees when over 25% of the stomates of young (1 and 2-year-old) foliage are occluded, causing early needle casting. Our hypothesis that disease severity is lower in mature trees because pseudothecia emerge later on older needles is supported. Within the mature tree crowns, we also found that pseudothecia density varied with needle age, canopy position, and site. In older and mature trees, pseudothecia of N. gaeumannii were most abundant on 3- and 4-year-old needles and density of pseudothecia on all needles was very low (< 10%). Something about mature forest canopies and foliage appears to decrease the success of needle colonization or increase the time it takes for pseudothecia to emerge from the needles, in contrast to younger plantations (), thus allowing the mature trees to have greater needle retention. Tree crown and canopy architectural differences may help explain these results, because mature trees have more complexities in microenvironmental patterns with deeper crowns, more shade, and less crown connectivity between trees, but this needs more studies in the future.

Author Disclaimer

This manuscript has been subjected to review by the Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

Y-HL contributed to the study design, field sampling, data process and analysis, and writing. DS contributed to the study design and writing and especially for the discussion. EL contributed to the data analysis cooperation and stats interpretation. PB contributed to the study design, field sampling, especially organizing the climbing crew, and discussion. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Swiss Needle Cast Cooperative at Oregon State University for providing funding and technical support during the research. We thank the EPA long term ecological monitoring network team for tree climbing and needle sampling supports. We really appreciate the tree climbing and ground support of Mike Bollman, Ron Waschmann, Steve Cline, Gabi Ritóková, Rong Fang, Rebecca Hsu, Brian Chiu, Eric Forsman, Dave Woodruff, Jimmy Swingle, Chia-Yun Hsu, Mark Ko, and Hans Song. We also thank Alexis Danley, Shannon Burton, and Lori Lewis for lab work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer CL declared a past collaboration with one of the authors DS to the handling editor.

Footnotes

1.^http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/explorer/, accessed 11 April 2021.

References

Summary

Keywords

Douglas-fir, fungal disease, foliar pathogen, Nothophaeocryptopus gaeumannii, Swiss needle cast, tree canopy

Citation

Lan Y-H, Shaw DC, Lee EH and Beedlow PA (2022) Distribution of a Foliage Disease Fungus Within Canopies of Mature Douglas-Fir in Western Oregon. Front. For. Glob. Change 5:743039. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.743039

Received

17 July 2021

Accepted

14 January 2022

Published

11 February 2022

Volume

5 - 2022

Edited by

Akihiro Nakamura, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Reviewed by

Romà Ogaya, Ecological and Forestry Applications Research Center (CREAF), Spain; Stefan Zeglen, Government of British Columbia, Canada; Christopher Lee, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yung-Hsiang Lan,

This article was submitted to Forest Growth, a section of the journal Frontiers in Forests and Global Change

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics