In the published article, there was an error. The data referred to needs to correspond to Figure 5. A correction has been made to Results and Discussion, “Chemical Profiling of Sceletium Populations,” Paragraph number 1.
Figure 5
This sentence previously stated:
“These metabolites, specifically dihydrojoubertiamine, 4-(3,4-dimethyoxyphenyl) 4-[2-acetylmethlamino)ethyl]cyclohexanone, mesembrenol and 4'-O-demethylmesembrenol, were highest in Drie Kuilen (209674± 156580 mg/kg DW) (Figure 5M), Warmwaterberg (59,805 ± 37,239 mg/kg DW; p < 0.0001) (Figure 5O), Kannaland (319,373 ± 198,464 mg/kg DW) (Figure 5F) and Warmwaterberg (388,263 ± 565,782 mg/kg DW) (Figure 5Q), respectively.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“These metabolites, specifically dihydrojoubertiamine, 4-(3,4-dimethyoxyphenyl) 4-[2-acetylmethlamino)ethyl]cyclohexanone, mesembrenol and 4'-O-demethylmesembrenol, were highest in Drie Kuilen (34.63 ± 25.86 mg/kg DW) (Figure 5M), Warmwaterberg (6.359 ± 3.964 mg/kg DW; p < 0.0001) (Figure 5O), De Rust (2.795 ± 0.2072 mg/kg DW) (Figure 5F) and Anysberg (181.2 ± 105.4 mg/kg DW) (Figure 5Q), respectively.”
In the published article, there was an error. The data referred to needs to correspond to Figure 5. A correction has been made to Results and Discussion, “Chemical Profiling of Sceletium Populations,” Paragraph number 2.
This sentence previously stated:
“A bi-plot of the PCA (Figure 3C) indicated that the major contributors to separation of the Kannaland population was mesembrenol (319,373 ± 198,464 mg/kg DW; Figure 5F) and Δ7-mesembrenone (3,737,464 ± 1,257,877 mg/kg DW; Figure 5D) and these were statistically significant (p < 0.0001).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“A bi-plot of the PCA (Figure 3C) indicated that the major contributors to separation of the Kannaland population was mesembrenol (1.480 ± 0.2515 mg/kg DW; Figure 5F) and Δ7-mesembrenone (397.8 ± 133.9 mg/kg DW; Figure 5D) and these were statistically significant (p < 0.0001).”
In the published article, there was an error. The data referred to needs to correspond to Figure 5. A correction has been made to Results and Discussion, “Chemical Profiling of Sceletium Populations,” Paragraph number 6.
This sentence previously stated:
“Eighteen different alkaloids were tentatively identified using MSE fragmentation patterns, relative retentions times and accurate mass spectra and several of these metabolites were quantitatively higher in some of the populations, namely, Kannaland (S. tortuosum) and Ladismith 1 exhibiting higher amounts of Δ7-mesembrenone (m/z 288.1600) concentrations of 3,737,464 ± 1,257,877 mg/kg DW (p < 0.0001). Mesembrine (m/z of 290.1757), that is used as a chemical marker in manufactured products of S. tortuosum (1, 10), was highest in the plants collected from Warmwaterberg (2,020,055 ± 864,952/kg DW) and Kannaland (1,541,227 ± 614,992/kg DW). Sceletium A4 (m/z of 325.1914) that is structurally different from mesembrine by having a 2,3-disubstituted pyridine moiety and 2 nitrogen atoms, occurred in highest relative ion intensity in those plants that were collected from Warmwaterberg (324,398 ± 227,304/kg DW; p < 0.0001).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Eighteen different alkaloids were tentatively identified using MSE fragmentation patterns, relative retentions times and accurate mass spectra and several of these metabolites were quantitatively higher in some of the populations, namely, Kannaland (S. tortuosum) and Ladismith 1 exhibiting higher amounts of Δ7-mesembrenone (m/z 288.1600) concentrations of 397.8 ± 133.9 mg/kg DW (p < 0.0001). Mesembrine (m/z of 290.1757), that is used as a chemical marker in manufactured products of S. tortuosum (1, 10), was highest in the plants collected from Drie Kuilen (1,640 ± 582.3 mg/kg DW) and Anysberg (1,402 ± 504.8 mg/kg DW). Sceletium A4 (m/z of 325.1914) that is structurally different from mesembrine by having a 2,3- disubstituted pyridine moiety and 2 nitrogen atoms, occurred in highest relative ion intensity in those plants that were collected from Drie Kuilen (114.5 ± 63.98 mg/kg DW; p < 0.0001).”
In the published article, there was an error. The data referred to needs to correspond to Figure 5. A correction has been made to Results and Discussion, “Chemical Profiling of Sceletium Populations,” Paragraph number 7.
This sentence previously stated:
“Joubertiamine alkaloids had a higher distribution in S. tortuosum species collected from Warmwaterberg and De Rust. The joubertiamine alkaloid 4-(3,4-dimethyoxyphenyl) 4-[2-acetylmethlamino)ethyl]cyclohexanone was found in concentrations of 59,805 ± 37,239 mg/kg DW and 257.3± 292.0 mg/kg DW (Figure 5O), respectively in these populations. S. rigidum (Prince Albert) had considerably lower levels of alkaloids than the other species. In the study of Patnala and Kanfer (46) samples of S. rigidum were reported to not have any mesembrine alkaloids. This particular species is morphologically different from all the other species in the genus (Figures 1D,E) as it has an upright form with many prominent idioblasts and a highly restricted distribution. In this study, it could easily be distinguished from the other Sceletium collections due to the absent of a number of alkaloids. This metabolomic strategy assisted in delineating species in their chemotaxonomic groups despite the observation of morphological similarity amongst the species.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Joubertiamine alkaloids had a higher distribution in S. tortuosum species collected from Warmwaterberg and De Rust. The joubertiamine alkaloid 4-(3,4-dimethyoxyphenyl) 4-[2-acetylmethlamino)ethyl]cyclohexanone was found in concentrations of 6.359 ± 3.964 mg/kg DW and 5.533 ± 6.848 mg/kg DW (Figure 5O), respectively in these populations. S. rigidum (Prince Albert) had considerably lower levels of alkaloids than the other species. In the study of Patnala and Kanfer (46) samples of S. rigidum were reported to not have any mesembrine alkaloids. This particular species is morphologically different from all the other species in the genus (Figures 1D,E) as it has an upright form with many prominent idioblasts and a highly restricted distribution. In this study, it could easily be distinguished from the other Sceletium collections due to the absent of a number of alkaloids. This metabolomic strategy assisted in delineating species in their chemotaxonomic groups despite the observation of morphological similarity amongst the species.”
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 5 as published. An older version of Figure 5 ended up uploaded. The corrected Figure 5 appears below.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
alkaloid chemistry, eco-metabolomics, kanna, kougoed, mesembrine, molecular networks
Citation
Reddy K, Stander MA, Stafford GI and Makunga NP (2022) Corrigendum: Mass spectrometry metabolomics and feature-based molecular networking reveals population-specific chemistry in some species of the Sceletium genus. Front. Nutr. 9:994203. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.994203
Received
14 July 2022
Accepted
18 July 2022
Published
08 September 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited and reviewed by
Ahmed Mediani, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Reddy, Stander, Stafford and Makunga.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nokwanda P. Makunga makunga@sun.ac.za
This article was submitted to Food Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Nutrition
†ORCID: Kaylan Reddy orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-2359
Marietjie A. Stander orcid.org/0000-0003-0806-9734
Gary I. Stafford orcid.org/0000-0003-0198-0955
Nokwanda P. Makunga orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-251X
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.