Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 28 October 2025

Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1638750

This article is part of the Research TopicProcessing and Preservation of Indigenous Food Crops: Sustainable Agenda for Nutrition Security in The Global SouthView all 9 articles

Redesigning traditional grains: a functional approach to protein quality using Kodo millet and chickpeas

Deeksha RanaDeeksha Rana1Renuka AggarwalRenuka Aggarwal1Harpreet KaurHarpreet Kaur1Aditi Sewak
Aditi Sewak1*Kiran BainsKiran Bains1Inderpreet Kaur DhaliwalInderpreet Kaur Dhaliwal2
  • 1Department of Food and Nutrition, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • 2Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Introduction: Diversifying staple diets with nutritionally dense crops like millets offers a viable strategy to combat hidden hunger and undernutrition. Studies suggest that including coarse cereals like millets can compensate for amino acid deficiencies. Kodo millet is rich in essential amino acids such as lysine, threonine, valine, and sulfur-containing amino acids, with a leucine-to-isoleucine ratio of approximately 2.0. Therefore, the present investigation was carried out to formulate and nutritionally evaluate millet-pulse-based food products by replacing traditional cereals.

Methods: Food products, such as “crispy crunch” and “nutrimilletvita,” were formulated using Kodo millet (IPS 178), wheat (PBW 826), rice (PR 131), and chickpea in different proportions. For “crispy crunch,” the ingredients were supplemented in the ratio of 50:30:20 percent, while “nutrimilletvita” was prepared with 50 percent supplementation of each of Kodo millet and chickpea. The developed food products were tested for their acceptability and nutritional composition against the traditional cereal.

Results: The overall acceptability of formulated crispy crunch and nutrimilletvita was 7.54 and 7.80, respectively, which was comparable with the wheat- and rice-based product and wheat-based product, respectively. These products had a substantial amount of protein (10.01–18.31 g/100 g) and lysine (3.96–4.06 g/100 g) with considerable in vitro protein digestibility (73.7–78.3%) and protein digestibility amino acid score (0.39–0.45). The products, when stored for 3 months, were found to be organoleptically acceptable for 45 days. The developed products were cost-effective and nutritionally superior when compared with their traditional and market counterparts.

Conclusion: The study concluded that consumption of one serving of developed kudo millet chickpea-based products met 22–41% of the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for protein and 46.1–79.5% of the lysine requirements of school-going children (7–12 years). Hence, the developed Kodo millet–chickpea combination can be effectively used as a replacement for wheat/rice for preparing various food products with good-quality protein.

1 Introduction

Every manifestation of childhood malnutrition, such as undernutrition (wasting, stunting, and underweight), micronutrient deficiencies, coupled with overweight and obesity, represents the triple burden of disease, particularly affecting low- and middle-income countries, and is a major contributor to poor health globally. It poses a significantly negative impact, being a major impediment to individual development, and hinders the achievement of full human potential (1). In 2022, global estimates indicated that 149 million children under the age of 5 years were stunted, nearly 45 million experienced wasting, around 340 million faced micronutrient deficiencies, and approximately 37 million were overweight or obese (2, 3). However, approximately 45% of deaths among children under 5 years worldwide can be attributed to undernutrition (4).

Child and maternal undernutrition remain a significantly persistent public health concern worldwide, especially in India, bearing the responsibility of nearly 15% of the country’s disease burden throughout (5). In addition to improvements in the availability of food, great segments of the population, especially vulnerable groups of the society (infants, young children, and women of reproductive age), remain susceptible to protein-energy malnutrition. However, inadequate intake of quality protein, critically in terms of amino acid composition, remains a continuing contributor to this predicament. Approximately 80% of children under 5 years in India are unable to meet minimum daily protein requirements when adjusted for amino acid composition. This shortfall contributes significantly to prevalent subclinical deficiencies and associated functional impairments (6). Due to plant-based dominated food preferences of major strata of the Indian population, the biological value of dietary protein remains suboptimal, characterized by an inherent deficiency in essential amino acids, notably lysine (7).

Lysine is an essential amino acid, crucial for collagen synthesis, absorption of calcium in human metabolism, production of various hormones, maintaining functionality of the immune system, and retention of nitrogen in the body, particularly during periods of rapid growth (infancy and adolescence) (8). It is often the first limiting amino acid in cereal-based diets, prepared primarily with wheat and rice as staple foods for most Indians. Unlike animal proteins, offering a balanced amino acid profile, plant-based proteins are commonly deprived of a good amino acid balance. Being characteristically low in lysine, cereal proteins may be complemented with legumes such as chickpeas, which are deficient in sulfur-containing amino acids like methionine and cysteine. This combination can complete the amino acid profile, resulting in the consumption of good-quality protein (9). However, an imbalance among these amino acids leads to incomplete protein synthesis, which further impairs lean body mass deposition and may compromise immune defense and cognitive function in children.

Children bearing chronic lysine deficiency may not suffer from evident protein-calorie malnutrition, but they may experience the condition referred to as “hidden hunger,” which is a form of micronutrient and amino acid insufficiency posing serious long-term consequences. Literature indicates that inadequate consumption of lysine among school-going children is associated with obstruction in linear growth, stunting, and increased susceptibility to infections owing to reduced hemoglobin levels. Sometimes, this deprivation may have consequences, such as delayed sexual maturation and impaired neurodevelopmental outcomes (10, 11). Furthermore, lysine deficiency can hinder serotonin metabolism, thereby becoming causative of behavioral and cognitive turbulences (12). In this regard, dietary intake of quality protein by children becomes a critical determinant of their nutritional status than the quantity of protein alone.

Nonetheless, despite the implementation of several nutrition support programs in the country, such as the Mid-Day Meal Scheme and Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), their effectiveness is inhibited due to the intake of poor-quality dietary protein in the provided meals. The National Family Health Survey-5 (13) reports suggested a minimal improvement in stunting and wasting indicators among Indian children over the past decade, emphasizing the insufficiency of current dietary interventions in addressing indispensable nutrient shortfalls. Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG-2), which calls for ending all forms of malnutrition by 2030, is not just based upon caloric sufficiency but also a transformation in dietary protein sources and quality.

In this regard, there has been an increasing scientific interest toward studying millets, especially underutilized minor millets, for their potential role in food and nutritional security. Millets are proficient in nutrients like dietary fiber, polyphenols, and micronutrients while they are resilient to climate stress. Among these, Kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum) is distinguished due to its superior nutritional profile and traditional acceptance in numerous Indian communities, containing approximately 8–9% protein, a significantly higher fiber content (~9%) with a promising amino acid composition than major cereals (rice or wheat) (14, 15). Prominently, Kodo millet contains higher lysine levels than most cereals, although not sufficient on its own to completely meet lysine requirements of the body (16). Therefore, it becomes highly complementary when combined with lysine-rich legumes, such as chickpeas.

Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) are a nutritionally well-acknowledged legume with a protein content ranging from 18 to 22% with a high lysine concentration. However, being deficient in methionine and cysteine, their independent effectiveness as a complete protein source is restrained (17). The combination of Kodo millet and chickpeas has the potential to overcome the mutual limitations due to their complementary amino acid profiles, resulting in a superiorly balanced and complete protein intake. This strategy can be ideal for addressing the protein quality gaps in vegetarian diets. Additionally, such combinations can provide a rich matrix of micronutrients as exemplified by iron, calcium, folate, and zinc, which are often concurrently deficient in regular diets of children, particularly in low-resource settings.

The functional and nutritional symbiosis of Kodo millet and chickpeas proposes a novel scope for the development of cost-effective, culturally suitable, protein-rich food products for children. Nonetheless, research evidence has assessed the nutritional benefits of millets or legumes independently, while few have explored their integrated potential in addressing lysine deficiency and improving the intake of quality protein among Indian children. Therefore, the current research aims to bridge that gap by scientifically formulating and evaluating value-added functional food products based on Kodo millet and chickpeas, specifically designed for school-going children.

Further, the thermo-functional dimensions, such as gelatinization behavior and water-holding capacity of Kodo millet, facilitate its use across diverse food formats, such as biscuits, porridges, and extruded snacks (18). However, fortification with legume flours can enhance protein density and amino acid score of such products, making them suitable for large-scale institutional feeding programs and household consumption alike. Empirical trials have shown that blending 70% Kodo millet flour with 30% soy or chickpea flour can increase the protein content of baked goods from 5.09% to over 11.8%, while also improving sensory acceptability (19).

Therefore, the present study is conceptualized as a novel intervention strategy focused on formulating and evaluating complementary millet-legume-based food products with an emphasis on lysine fortification. This study addresses a critical nutritional deficiency not just by increasing protein intake but by enhancing its biological utilization, having direct implications in child growth, cognitive development, and long-term health. By harnessing the advantages of traditional grains and legumes through modern processing and scientific evaluation, this research contributes toward a sustainable, scalable, and nutritionally sound approach to combat protein quality deficiency in resource-constrained populations.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Procurement and processing of sample

Kodo millet (IPs 178), wheat (PBW 826), and rice (PR 131) were sourced from the Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics at Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), Ludhiana, immediately after harvest, and chickpea was purchased from the local market. The procured grains were cleaned, dried in a hot air oven (Model MSW 211, Macro Scientific Works Pvt. Ltd., India) to achieve desired moisture level (5%) and then finely ground into flour using high speed domestic stoneless flour mill (Saffron, Relitech Industries Pvt., Ltd., Ahmedabad, India) for subsequent nutritional analysis of the raw material.

2.2 Development of Kodo millet–chickpea–based food products

For the development of value-added products, a combination of Kodo millet (IPs 178) flour along with chickpea flour was used (Table 1). Chickpea has good-quality protein; therefore, it was selected for the development of products. The developed products were subsequently compared with recipes prepared using flours of cereal counterparts, such as wheat or rice, serving as controls. In the current study, the target group was school-going children, keeping in view their food preferences, millet-pulse-based products were developed. Offering milk as a meal or snack is a common dietary practice followed by parents for their school-going children. So, nutrimilletvita, which could be mixed with milk, was developed using Kodo millet flour and chickpea flour. Further, eating fried snacks in between meals is also common among children in India. Therefore, to fulfil the energy and protein requirements of this age, along with improvement in protein quality, a fried snack named crispy crunch was also developed.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Development of Kodo millet-chickpea products.

2.3 Organoleptic evaluation of the developed food products

Semi-trained individuals affiliated with the Department of Food and Nutrition at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, conducted sensory evaluations of standardized products derived from Kodo millet–chickpea combination, which were assessed on the basis of various sensory attributes, such as color, appearance, texture, taste, flavor, and overall acceptability (Figure 1). The evaluation was performed utilizing a nine-point Hedonic rating scale, where a rating of 9 represented “like extremely” and a rating of 1 represented “dislike extremely” (21).

Figure 1
Radar chart comparing four variations of crispy crunch products on six attributes: color, appearance, texture, taste, flavor, and overall acceptability. Lines represent Control Crispy Crunch (orange), Control Nutrivita (green), Kodo-Millet-Chickpea Crispy Crunch (yellow), and Kodo-Millet-Chickpea Nutrimilletvita (brown), with ratings ranging from 6.6 to 8.

Figure 1. Organoleptic evaluation of Kodo millet–chickpea products.

2.4 Nutritional evaluation of millet pulse-based food products

The developed products derived from Kodo millet–chickpea, alongside their respective control counterparts, prepared from conventional cereal sources such as wheat or rice, underwent comprehensive analysis for various nutritional parameters such as proximate composition, estimation of amino acid content, estimation of protein digestibility, and protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS).

2.4.1 Proximate composition

Moisture, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, and ash were analyzed using three replications of each formulation (22). A 5 g sample was weighed and placed in three pre-weighed China crucibles in a hot air oven at 105°C for 8 h to dry to a constant weight to determine its moisture content. Nitrogen determination was done using the macro Kjeldahl method (KEL PLUS KES 12 L RTS, Pelican Equipments, India), where nitrogen was converted to crude protein using a conversion factor of 6.25. The crude fat content was determined using the Automatic Soxhlet apparatus (SOCSPLUS—SCS 06 AS DLS TS), moisture-free sample was placed in a thimble, and fat was extracted using petroleum ether as a solvent. The extracted fat from the sample was weighed after evaporating the remaining solvent. Crude fiber was determined using a 5 g (moisture and fat-free) sample by refluxing with 1.25% sulfuric acid initially, followed by 1.25% sodium hydroxide (NaOH). It was further oven-dried, and ash content was analyzed by igniting the weighed samples at 550 °C in a muffle furnace (Laboratory Model NSW 101, Narang Scientific Works Pvt., Ltd., India) for 4 h. After cooling in a desiccator, the crucible with residue was weighed again. Total carbohydrates were calculated by subtracting the sum of all proximate parameters (moisture content, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, and total ash) from 100.

2.4.2 Amino acids by GC–MS reagents amino acid extraction

The sample (0.2 g) was homogenized with 1.5 mL of 0.1 M HCl and centrifuged (Abdos DMO412). The supernatant was collected and stored (−80°C) until analysis. For the deproteinization and derivatization, the extract (100 μL) was combined with 250 μL of acetonitrile in a safe-lock micro test tube and centrifuged (10,000 rpm/3 min). The supernatant was mixed with 100 μL of an internal standard (IS) solution (5 μg/mL) and transferred to heat-resistant tubes, subsequently dried under nitrogen. 1-Chloromethane (50 μL) was added to the dried samples and the mixture was evaporated. Further, MTBSTFA (50 μL) and acetonitrile (50 μL) were added and incubated (100°C for 60 min), followed by refrigeration for storage and later analyzed by GC–MS (GCMS 2400 System, PerkinElmer, United States) for amino acids.

2.4.3 In vitro protein digestibility

In vitro protein digestibility was analyzed by mixing dry sample (0.5 g) with pepsin solution (50 mL) in a 250 mL conical flask, followed by incubation at 37°C for 24 h (Waiometra OSIV-5642). The solution was then neutralized with approximately 30 mL of 0.2 N NaOH, after which pancreatin solution (50 mL) was added and again incubated (37°C for 24 h). An enzyme blank (without sample) was concurrently run under prescribed conditions, and an aseptic environment in the system was maintained by adding a few drops of toluene. Subsequently, the contents were centrifuged at high speed and filtered through Whatman No. 44 filter paper, and the residue was analyzed for nitrogen content using the macro-Kjeldahl method. The digestibility coefficient was determined by subtracting the residual protein from the initial protein content based on 100 g of the sample (23).

2.4.4 Protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (24)

PDCAAS was calculated using the following formula.

PDCAAS = (mg of limiting amino acid in 1 g of test protein/mg of the same amino acid in 1 g reference protein) × in vitro protein digestibility,

where lysine was identified as the most limiting amino acid. The reference amino acid pattern corresponded to the amino acid requirements of preschool children aged 2–5 years, and values exceeding 1.00 were adjusted and recorded as 1.00.

2.5 Shelf-life evaluation of the developed food products

Developed food products were kept in low-density polyethylene pouches (thickness: 51 microns) at room temperature. The organoleptic characteristics of the stored products were evaluated every 15 days using a 9-point hedonic scale for 3 months (25).

2.6 Consumer acceptability of the developed food products

Consumer acceptability of the developed products was assessed by at least 50 school-going children (7–12 years) using a Likert Rating Scale. It provides a quantitative way to capture respondents’ attitudes and perceptions on a scale ranging from extremely liked to extremely disliked with scores of 5 and 1, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Radar chart comparing four products: Control crispy crunch, Control nutrivita, Kodo millet-chickpea crispy crunch, and Kodo millet-chickpea nutrimilletvita. Evaluated attributes are color, appearance, texture, taste, flavor, and overall acceptability on a scale from zero to five. Each product displays a distinct pattern, illustrating varying performance across the attributes.

Figure 2. Consumer acceptability of Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch and nutrimilletvita (100 g, dry weight basis).

2.7 Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed in a completely randomized design using SPSS software (26 version). Mean and standard deviation for the various parameters were computed. Analysis of Variance (One-way ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann–Whitney test were employed to assess the sensory and nutritional parameters of developed value-added food products prepared from Kodo millet–chickpea. The methodology of the study has been illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3
Flowchart illustrating the process of developing Kodo millet-chickpea-based food products. It begins with procuring ingredients and processing them into flour. Two products, Nutrimilletvita and Crispy Crunch, are evaluated organoleptically, nutritionally, and for shelf-life and consumer acceptability. Statistical analysis follows.

Figure 3. Methodology of the study.

3 Results

3.1 Organoleptic evaluation of Kodo millet–chickpea products

The developed foods were subjected to organoleptic evaluation by a panel of semi-trained judges, and the results revealed that among the developed products, nutrimilletvita obtained a higher overall acceptability score (7.80 ± 0.42) than crispy crunch (7.54 ± 0.34) (Figure 1). Both the developed products received comparable overall acceptability scores with respect to their control counterparts and were found to be acceptable by the panel of judges by obtaining a score of more than 7.5. A significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) in the sensory characteristics (color, texture, taste, and flavor) was found between the prepared crispy crunch and its control, while nutrimilletvita displayed a non-significant difference.

3.2 Nutritional composition

3.2.1 Proximate composition of Kodo millet–chickpea products

The crude protein content in the Kodo millet–chickpea–based value-added products ranged from 6.90 ± 0.00 to 18.31 ± 2.85 g/100 g on a dry weight basis, with a higher content in Kodo millet–chickpea nutrimilletvita. The observed protein content in developed products was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher than their respective control counterparts (Table 2). Significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher crude fiber content was also observed in Kodo millet–chickpea nutrimilletvita (5.00 ± 0.60 g/100 g) as compared with Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch, where both the developed products displayed significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher crude fiber content than their corresponding control products. However, the crude fat content varied significantly (p ≤ 0.01) in the developed products and ranged from 7.80 ± 0.26 to 25.60 ± 1.15 g/100 g, with maximum content exhibited by Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Nutritional composition of Kodo millet–chickpea products (g/100 g, dry weight basis).

3.2.2 Amino acid composition

The indispensable amino acid profile of the products prepared from Kodo millet–chickpea revealed that the amount of the most limiting amino acid, lysine, in cereal diets was found to be significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher in the developed products than their control counterparts (Table 3). Significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher lysine content was observed in Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch (4.06 ± 0.56 g/100 g). Other indispensable amino acids, such as, methionine, valine, and leucine varied in a narrow range. Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch was found to have higher values of many indispensable amino acids to the tune of leucine (16.02 ± 0.03 g/100 g), phenylalanine (6.71 ± 0.16 g/100 g), isoleucine (7.02 ± 0.10 g/100 g), and tryptophan (2.06 ± 0.02 g/100 g). Similarly, significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher leucine (15.03 ± 0.74 g/100 g) and isoleucine (5.19 ± 0.09 g/100 g) content was displayed by the developed nutrimilletvita than its control counterpart.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Amino acid composition of Kodo millet–chickpea products (g/100 g, dry weight basis).

However, the data about dispensable amino acids of the developed products revealed that all the dispensable amino acids, such as alanine, arginine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, serine, and tyrosine, varied significantly (p ≤ 0.01) among the developed products. However, the values of tyrosine were found to be lower in all the products in comparison to other amino acids.

3.2.3 In vitro protein digestibility and PDCAAS of the products prepared from Kodo millet–chickpea

In the current investigation, the in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) and PDCAAS of the developed nutrimilletvita were found to be 73.66 ± 5.86 percent and 0.39 ± 0.07, respectively, which was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) lower than 78.33 ± 2.08 percent and 0.45 ± 0.07, respectively, in Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch (Figures 4, 5). However, significantly (p ≤ 0.01) lower in vitro protein digestibility and PDCAAS values were also observed in the respective control groups of the developed products.

Figure 4
Bar chart showing the percentage preferences for four developed products. Control crispy crunch at 70.67%, Kodo millet-chickpea crispy crunch at 78.33%, Control nutrivita at 71.24%, and Kodo millet-chickpea nutrimilletvita at 73.66%. Error bars indicate variability.

Figure 4. In vitro protein digestibility of Kodo millet–chickpea products (100 g, dry weight basis).

Figure 5
Bar chart comparing PDCAAS values of different developed products. Control crispy crunch scores 0.3, Kodo millet-chickpea crispy crunch scores 0.45, Control nutrivita scores 0.37, and Kodo millet-chickpea nutrimilletvita scores 0.39. Error bars are present for each product.

Figure 5. Protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) of Kodo millet–chickpea products (100 g, dry weight basis).

3.3 Consumer acceptability of the products prepared from Kodo millet-chickpea

The developed products were tested for their acceptability by the consumers (Figure 2). Fifty children in the age group of 7–12 years were asked to evaluate the developed products based on the Likert scale. Both the developed products were found to attain an overall acceptability score of more than 3, with a higher score displayed by Kodo millet–chickpea nutrimilletvita (4.70 ± 0.21). The scores obtained were found to be statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) when analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test.

3.4 Shelf-life evaluation of the products prepared from Kodo millet-chickpea

The food products developed from a combination of Kodo millet and chickpea, were sealed in low-density polyethylene pouches (thickness-51 microns) and stored at a constant room temperature (37 °C) in cool and dry conditions, which were evaluated every 15 days over 3 months through sensory assessments conducted by a semi-trained panel using a 9-point Hedonic scale (Tables 4, 5). The sensory scores of the developed products, Crispy Crunch and Nutrimilletvita, were 7.90 ± 0.52 and 8.10 ± 0.52, respectively, on the 0th day. These scores gradually declined to 5.45 ± 0.57 and 5.69 ± 0.34 by the 90th day, showing a significant (p ≤ 0.01) decrease over the 3-month storage period.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Sensory scores of crispy crunch prepared from kodo millet-chickpea at an interval of 15 days for 3 months.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Sensory scores of nutrimilletvita prepared from kodo millet–chickpea at an interval of 15 days for 3 months.

3.5 Nutritional composition of the products prepared from Kodo millet–chickpea (on a per-serving basis)

The portion size of the developed products was calculated using the standardized measuring containers. The serving size of crispy crunch was standardized as 25 g and nutrimilletvita as 15 g. The nutritional composition of the products prepared from Kodo millet–chickpea based was worked out. The developed Kodo millet–chickpea-based crispy crunch provided 2.5 g of protein and 1.01 g of lysine, whereas the prepared nutrimilletvita, which should be taken along with milk (100 mL), provided 6 g of protein and 9.18 g of lysine (Figure 6). Therefore, consuming one serving of prepared products was found to meet about 22–41% of the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for protein and fulfilled approximately 100% of the lysine requirement (The RDAs mentioned in the RDA table by ICMR for 13–15-year-old children have been considered for calculating the percent contribution of the product in meeting RDA).

Figure 6
Bar chart comparing protein and lysine content in various food samples. Crispy crunch control (25g) has 1.72g protein and 0.87g lysine, while Kodo millet chickpea (25g) has 2.5g protein and 1.01g lysine. Nutrimilletvita control (15g) has 2.4g protein and 0.6g lysine; Kodo millet chickpea (15g) has 2.74g protein and 0.59g lysine. A 100mL portion has 3.26g protein and 8.59g lysine. Totals are 6g protein and 9.18g lysine. Blue bars represent protein, yellow bars represent lysine.

Figure 6. Nutritional composition of Kodo millet-chickpea product (per serving basis).

3.6 Cost estimation of the products prepared from Kodo millet-chickpea

The cost estimation of the product was done considering the raw ingredients used along with overhead charges (30%) on a per-serving basis. It was observed that the crispy crunch was prepared with the amount of Rs. 7.80 (on a per-serving basis), while nutrimilletvita was prepared with a cost of Rs. 27.15, with a milk-inclusive cost of Rs. 33.15/−.

3.7 Cost–benefit ratio of finger millet-chickpea product

The cost–benefit ratio of crispy crunch and nutrimilletvita prepared from Kodo millet–chickpea combination was found to be 1.42 and 1.17, respectively, which shows that the developed products are profitable and sustainable.

4 Discussion

4.1 Organoleptic evaluation of Kodo millet-chickpea products

Organoleptic properties of a food are perceived by human senses, such as smell, touch, sight, and taste. The acceptance or rejection of food is predicted solely by its ability to meet consumer expectations and needs (26). In the current study, cereals were replaced with a combination of millets and chickpeas to develop a high-quality protein product optimized to meet the preferences of school-going children. Kodo millet was replaced with wheat and rice from 30 to 50 percent, depending upon the acceptability of the products. As crispy crunch is preferred and liked by the targeted group, it obtained an overall acceptability score of more than 7.5.

However, the crispy crunch prepared from Kodo millet–chickpea obtained a score lower than the control, primarily due to the fibrous residue left after chewing (27), attributable to the high fiber content of Kodo millet, which also proved to be the highest among all flours used in the preparation of the products However, the Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch prepared in the present investigation was characterized by its darker hue and inconsistent texture and received lower scores in both color and overall acceptability compared with its control counterparts. Similar results were reported by a research study that revealed an overall acceptability score ranging from 7.65 to 8.25 in Kurkure developed from Kodo millet (28). Also, the nutrimilletvita developed from Kodo millet–chickpea was in powdered form and had to be consumed with milk and had higher scores than the control. A similar study reported that the preparation of a weaning food using millet and pulse combination reported higher acceptability in nutritional and sensory quality compared to its counterparts (29). These findings were substantiated through an analysis of various physical, chemical, and sensory attributes. Overall, among both the developed products, Kodo millet–chickpea nutrimilletvita obtained a higher overall acceptability score.

4.2 Proximate composition of Kodo millet–chickpea products

In the current study, the crude protein content was found to be more than 10 g/100 g in both the developed products, which could be attributed to the millet and pulse combination. The protein present in millets is higher than in traditional cereal wheat and rice, out of which 44.7% of the amino acids are essential (30). The nutrimilletvita had higher protein content than crispy crunch, which could be due to the use of a higher amount of millet and pulse used in the preparation of nutrimilletvita. Moreover, deep frying of crispy crunch might have led to its lower protein content. A similar trend of protein in fried snacks made up of Kodo millet, having 11.08 percent protein content, was reported (31). It was observed that the developed value-added food products had higher protein content than traditional counterparts, indicating that these can be used as a nutrient-dense food by the targeted group and may help in alleviating protein deficiency among them. Moreover, the developed products are mostly preferred by children, so there are chances of more consumption of these products, leading to their higher nutritional status. The results of the current investigation are in line with other research findings, which reported protein content of 12.25 g/100 g in developed nutri-rich RTE using finger millet and corn in the ratio of 25:75 (32).

The variation in the crude fat content among the different products can be attributed to the use of different ingredients for their preparation. Moreover, it was observed that Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch had higher fat content during frying as compared with other products. Both the products developed from Kodo millet in the current study had higher fat content than their control counterparts, which can be due to the greater fat absorption by the millet as it has higher fiber content (7.40 ± 0.39 g/100 g). Moreover, Kodo millet has high amylose content, which forms a porous structure and swells when cooked, allowing more fat to absorb (33, 34). A similar range of fat content in millet-based products was found in finger millet chocolate (23.62 g/100 g), porso millet chakli (30.47 g/100 g), finger millet cookies (15 g/100 g), and instant health mix (3537).

The crude fiber content of any product depends upon the processing techniques used for its preparation. In the current study, the Kodo millet–based products were found to have a higher crude fiber content, which can be attributed to more fiber present in the grain (7.40 ± 0.39), as compared with the other grains used in the study. The results showed that the fiber content was higher in all the developed products than their control counterparts, which can be due to the presence of higher amounts of fiber in millet and pulse grains. Similarly, other research evidence reported crude fiber content of 5.09 and 7.86 g/100 g in Kodo millet mathri and chocofills (32, 38).

4.3 Amino acid composition

The presence of indispensable amino acids in a food improves its quality, and the absence of any one of them makes the protein inferior, and it is not utilized by the body to make muscle protein (39). Hence, a food must have all the indispensable amino acids. In India, cereal-based diets offer poor quality protein with quality protein differences ranging from 4 to 26 percent (40). Therefore, in the current study, an attempt was made to replace cereals with millets and pulses to improve the quantity and quality of protein.

The food products developed with a millet-pulse combination resulted in a better amino acid profile. Lysine, the limiting amino acid of cereals, was found to be increased in the developed products. The maximum lysine percent increase content was observed in Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch (16.0%). The increase in lysine content of the developed products can be attributed to the amino acid profile of millets and pulses, complementary amino acid combination, and their synergetic effect. It was reported that millet pulse blend provided a balanced amino acid profile, particularly increased lysine levels (28).

The data obtained from analysis of dispensable amino acids showed that all of them, such as alanine, arginine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, serine, and tyrosine, are present in sufficient amounts in the developed products. It is believed that these can be synthesized by the body and so are not required in the diet. However, the presence of dispensable amino acids in food is also important as they help to balance the overall amino acid profile of food. This balance is important for efficient protein synthesis and utilization in the body. Moreover, foods that contain a variety of amino acids, such as dispensable amino acids, contribute to a more balanced protein source (41). An investigation on the dispensable amino acid profile of millet pulse-based products found that dispensable amino acids, such as arginine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and glycine content, increased in the products than their control counterparts (42).

4.4 In vitro protein digestibility and PDCAAS

In vitro protein digestibility of any product depends upon its amino acid profile, protein content, pH ionic strength, temperature, and anti-nutritional factors. The processing technology applied also affects the digestibility. The in vitro protein digestibility of the developed products was found to be more than 70%,% with a digestibility of 78.33% in Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch. The higher protein digestibility depicts the balanced amino acid profile in the ingredients used for the development of the products. The in vitro protein digestibility led to a high PDCAAS value of more than 0.4 in Kodo millet–chickpea crispy crunch (0.45). The combination of millet and pulse has led to the improvement in protein digestibility and PDCAAS since this combination makes a more balanced amino acid profile, improving overall protein quality (43). Similar results in the in vitro protein digestibility and protein digestibility–corrected amino acid score of the millet soybean blend had been observed (44). From the foregoing results, it can be interpreted that millet pulse–based foods can help in improving nutritional health and food security, especially in developing countries, where cereals are consumed as staple foods. The consumption of these newly developed foods by the vulnerable population may improve their nutritional status, decreasing the prevalence of undernutrition.

4.5 Consumer acceptability of Kodo millet–chickpea products

Consumer acceptability evaluation scale is a measure of using the Likert scale to determine the liking of consumers for food items in terms of their taste, texture, appearance, flavor, etc. In the current study, the developed products obtained scores comparable with their control counterparts, depicting the consumer’s acceptability toward this product. The low score of Kodo millet–chickpea can be due to the dark green color that the product attained after frying, which is clear from the scores for color (3.22), appearance (2.70), texture (3.70), taste (4.00), and flavor (2.70). Moreover, the product observed had higher fat and was commented as oily due to more fat absorption by the millet as it has higher fiber content (7.40 ± 0.39 g/100 g). Moreover, Kodo millet has high amylose content, which forms a porous structure and swells when cooked, allowing more fat to be absorbed. On the contrary, the developed nutrimilletvita obtained a significantly higher overall acceptability score of 4.70 as compared with the developed crispy crunch as well as the control nutrivita. This could be attributed to the addition of milk powder and cocoa powder along with millet powder, making an acceptable combination for consumption, particularly by school-going children. The consumers showed great satisfaction and liking for the developed Kodo millet–chickpea–based products, which is clear from the overall acceptability score. Evidence suggested that pearl millet-based dalia received higher acceptability scores compared with their control counterpart (45). Contrary to the present study, a study reported the reception of low organoleptic scores (3.1 to 3.7) of finger millet-based food products (46). The addition of chickpeas to the products in the current study might have improved the taste and overall consumer acceptability. The combination not only balances the flavor profile but also improves texture and nutritional quality, making the products more appealing and beneficial. Likewise, the addition of pulses was reported to improve the unique aroma and texture of millet-based foods (47, 48).

4.6 Shelf-life evaluation of Kodo millet–chickpea products

Millets with high-fat content can oxidize when exposed to air at varying rates, which degrades both their nutritional value and sensory quality. The shelf life of millet flour is shortened because of oxidative and hydrolytic deterioration (49). The lower shelf life of millet is mainly due to the presence of enzymes such as lipase and lipoxygenase, which trigger the oxidation of a large amount of fat present in flour, resulting in the production of an off-odor and flavor. As a result, rancidity is one of the most significant drawbacks of millet consumption (50). The oxidation of phenolic components by polyphenol oxidase and peroxidases, in addition to fatty acid oxidation, causes off-flavor and browning of millet flour during storage (51). To study the changes in organoleptic parameters of the developed products, the products were stored for 3-month periods and evaluated at an interval of 15 days. It was observed that the acceptability decreased with an increase in storage period. The developed products were acceptable for a period of 45 days, after which less acceptability scores were obtained. Similarly, a significant drop in the overall acceptability of a millet-based composite sports bar was noted from 38.3 to 13.1 over 3 months, while another report documented a comparable trend in karonda candy, whereby the overall acceptability gradually fell from 8.01 to 7.74 for unripe and from 7.78 to 6.98 for ripe candies over a 6-month storage period (52, 53).

4.7 Nutritional composition (per serving basis) of Kodo millet-chickpea products

The millet pulse-based product has been developed for school-going children, so it is important to know the amount of nutrients on a per serving basis. The developed food products were found to be rich in protein and lysine based on their one portion in comparison to their control counterparts. Hence, consumption of one portion of the millet pulse–based developed in the current study can help in combating protein malnutrition and improving protein quality in the country. Evidence emphasized that adding pulses to millet-based food increases both protein and lysine content (54).

4.8 Cost estimation of Kodo millet-chickpea food products

The cost of the developed product was compared with the available options in the market. It was observed that the same serving size of the crispy crunch of Brand A (25 g) is available at Rs. 24.87/−, while the developed product had a cost of Rs. 7.80/− Similarly, nutrimilletvita (100 g) was also found to be prepared at a lesser price of 11.21% per gram compared with varied options in the market. The data obtained highlighted the fact that the developed product involved less money in its preparation than its control and market counterparts. Moreover, these products had higher nutritional value. Therefore, the products developed in the current study are economical options for recommendation to the target group for combating undernutrition. Research demonstrated that the developed finger millet mix jaggery chocolate not only offers substantial cost savings but also boasts a superior nutrient profile when compared with a commercially available market product (35).

5 Conclusion

In the present investigation, the combination of Kodo millet and chickpea demonstrated an enhanced potential for the development of value-added, cost-effective products characterized by high organoleptic quality, enhanced nutritional attributes, extended shelf-life, and strong consumer acceptability. The formulated products delivered good-quality protein, exhibited improved in vitro protein digestibility, and achieved a higher PDCAAS. The products also demonstrated greater consumer acceptance and exhibited a shelf-life of up to 45 days. Based on these findings, it can be inferred that millet- and pulse-based foods have the potential to enhance nutritional health and promote food security, particularly in developing countries where cereals serve as staple foods. Thus, products developed from Kodo millet and chickpea demonstrated superior nutritional value per serving compared with conventional cereal-based foods, presenting an effective approach to addressing protein malnutrition and enhancing food security. Millet–pulse combinations are especially recommended for vulnerable populations, such as school-aged children, pregnant women, and adolescent girls, to ensure adequate intake of high-quality protein. These nutrient-dense products can also be integrated into National Feeding Programs to combat malnutrition at the community level. The potential of millet-based food products for children appears highly encouraging and is fueled by the growing demand for nutritious, allergy-friendly, and sustainable dietary options. Additionally, the increasing popularity of functional foods, gluten-free diets, and personalized nutrition offers opportunities for innovation, exemplified by the millet-based formulations developed in the present study.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. No harm was given to the subjects; only sensory evaluation of the developed millet-based products was conducted for consumer acceptability. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

DR: Writing – original draft. RA: Writing – original draft. HK: Writing – review & editing. AS: Writing – review & editing. KB: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. ID: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Central Institute of Women in Agriculture (CIWA), Bhubaneswar, for purchasing the requisite chemicals and other facilities required to carry out this research work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Amoroso, L. The second international conference on nutrition: implications for hidden hunger. World Rev Nutr Dietet. (2016) 115:142–52. doi: 10.1159/000442100

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. World Health Organization. Malnutrition. (2024) Available online at: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition (Accessed August 24, 2025).

Google Scholar

3. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (Accessed January 26, 2021).

Google Scholar

4. World Health Organization. Malnutrition. Available online at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition (Accessed January 26, 2021).

Google Scholar

5. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network (2020) Global burden of disease study 2019 (GBD 2019) results. Seattle, United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).

Google Scholar

6. Zhu, T, Zhang, L, Li, R, Li, X, Zhu, H, and Shu, L. Associations between protein intake status and the association of “double burden of malnutrition” in children aged 2–5 years: a health and nutrition survey of selected children in Bengbu City, China. Front Nutr. (2025) 12:1564733. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1564733

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. FAO/WHO/UNU. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition In: WHO technical report series no. 935. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (2007).

Google Scholar

8. Wu, G. Amino acids: metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids. (2013) 45:407–11. doi: 10.1007/s00726-013-1500-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Young, VR, and Pellett, PL. Plant proteins in relation to human protein and amino acid nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. (1994) 59:1203S–12S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.5.1203S

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Rashmi, MR, Shweta, BM, Fathima, FN, Agrawal, T, Shah, M, and Sequeira, R. Prevalence of Malnutrition and Relationship with Scholastic Performance among Primary and Secondary School Children in Two Select Private Schools in Bangalore Rural District (India). Ind Journal Comm Med. (2015) 49:97–102. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.153871

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Naik, AA, Zhang, Q, and Zhang, Q. Slow physical growth, delayed reflex ontogeny, and permanent behavioral as well as cognitive impairments in rats following intra-generational protein malnutrition. Front Neurosci. (2015) 9:446. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00446

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Fernstrom, JD. Can nutrient supplements modify brain function? Am J Clin Nutr. (2000) 71:1669S–73S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1669S

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. National Family Health Survey-5. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. New Delhi and Mumbai, India: Ministry of Health and Family (2021).

Google Scholar

14. Saleh, ASM, Zhang, Q, Chen, J, and Shen, Q. Millet grains: nutritional quality, processing, and potential health benefits. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2013) 12:281–95. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12012

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Gopalan, C, Ramasastri, BV, and Balasubramanian, SC. Nutritive value of Indian foods National Institute of Nutrition, ICMR. Hyderabad, India: National Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (2004).

Google Scholar

16. Sharma, R, Sharma, S, Dar, BN, and Singh, B. Millets as potential nutri-cereals: a review of nutrient composition, phytochemical profile and techno-functionality. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2021) 56:3703–18. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.15044

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Rizzo, G, and Baroni, L. Plant-based diets and mineral bioavailability: a review. Forum Nutr. (2018) 10:1492. doi: 10.3390/nu10010043

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chandrasekara, A, and Shahidi, F. Antiproliferative potential and DNA scission inhibitory activity of phenolics from whole millet grains. J Funct Foods. (2011) 3:159–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Nambiar, VS, Dhaduk, JJ, Sareen, N, Shahu, T, and Desai, R. Potential functional implications of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in health and disease. J Appl Pharmaceut Sci. (2011) 1:62–7.

Google Scholar

20. Arora, L, Aggarwal, R, Dhaliwal, I, Gupta, OP, and Kaushik, P. Assessment of sensory and nutritional attributes of foxtail millet-based food products. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:1146545. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1146545

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Nicolas, L, Marquilly, C, and O’Michael, M. The 9-point hedonic scale: are words and numbers compatible? Food Qual Prefer. (2010) 21:1008–15. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2000).

Google Scholar

23. Akeson, WE, and Stachinan, MA. A pepsin-pancreatin digest index of protein quality evaluation. J Nutr. (1964) 83:257–61. doi: 10.1093/jn/83.3.257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Rutherfurd, SM, Fanning, AC, Miller, BJ, and Moughan, PJ. Protein digestibility- corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats. J Nutr. (2015) 145:372–9. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.195438

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Likert, R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. (1932) 22:1–55.

Google Scholar

26. Mosca, AC, van de Velde, F, Bult, JH, van Boekel, MA, and Stieger, M. Taste enhancement in food gels: effect of fracture properties on oral breakdown, bolus formation and sweetness intensity. Food Hydr. (2015) 43:794–02. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.08.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Dhingra, D, Michael, M, Rajput, H, and Patil, RT. Dietary fibre in foods: a review. J Food Sci Tech. (2012) 49:255–66. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0365-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Thakur, K. Development of baked and extruded products from Kodo millet. Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry (DYSUHF), Solan. [Master Thesis]. (2020).

Google Scholar

29. Prasanna, MS, Sowjanya, VS, Jaya, E, and Rajender, G. Development of millet based instant weaning mix. J Pharmacog Phytochem. (2020) 9:1908–13.

Google Scholar

30. Gyawali, P. Production trend, constraints, and strategies for millet cultivation in Nepal: a study from review perspective. Int J Agric Appl Sci. (2021) 2:30–40. doi: 10.52804/ijaas2021.213

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kavya, MR, Manasa, R, and Shivananjappa, M. Formulation and evaluation of mathri developed with partial replacement of wheat flour with Kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum) flour. IP J Nutr Metab Health Sci. (2023) 6:28–31. doi: 10.18231/j.ijnmhs.2023.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Venugopal, H, Jayaprakasha, HM, and Arunkumar, H. Nutririch millet (finger millet) and legume (Macrotyloma uniflorum) in developing ready-to-eat (RTE) food. Int J Adv Res Ideas Innov Technol. (2018) 4:136–9.

Google Scholar

33. Jideani, VA, and Jideani, IA. Developments on the cereal grains of millet: a review. J Food Sci Tech. (2011) 48:501–13. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0208-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Singh, N, and Kaur, L. Starch digestibility in millets: a review. Food Chem. (2004) 87:217–24.

Google Scholar

35. Choubey, D. Process standardization for the development of finger millet mix jaggery chocolate (doctoral dissertation). Pantnagar: GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology (2022).

Google Scholar

36. Sarojani, JK, Suvarna, CH, Hilli, JS, and Sneha, S. Development of ready to cook Kodo millet pasta. Pharma Innov J. (2021) 10:910–5.

Google Scholar

37. Jayram. Studies on preparation of oat and finger millet cookies (M. Sc dissertation). Parbhani: Vasantrao naik makrathwada krishi Vidyapeeth (2016).

Google Scholar

38. Geetha, K, Ilamaran, M, Ramasamy, DP, and Abdullah, E. Studies on optimize the process for development of millet based chocofills. Int J Chem Stud. (2020) 8:2637–9. doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i1an.8670

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Fitts, RH, Ramatowski, JG, and Peters, JR. The deleterious effects of bed rest on human skeletal muscle fibres are exacerbated by hypercortisolemia and ameliorated by dietary supplementation. Amer J Physiol Cell Physiol. (2007) 293:313–20. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00573.2006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Minocha, S, Thomas, T, and Kurpad, AV. Dietary protein and the health-nutrition-agriculture connection in India. J Nutr. (2017) 147:1243–50. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.243980

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wu, G. Amino acids: metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids. (2009) 37:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0269-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Anitha, S, Govindaraj, M, and Kane-Potaka, J. Balanced amino acid and higher micronutrients in millets complements legumes for improved human dietary nutrition. Cereal Chem. (2019) 1–11. doi: 10.1002/cche.10227

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Shukla, K, and Srivastava, S. Evaluation of finger millet incorporated noodles for nutritive value and glycemic index. J Food Sci Technol. (2014) 51:527–34. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0530-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Inyang, CU, and Zakari, UM. Effect of germination and fermentation of pearl millet on proximate chemical and sensory properties of instant ‘Fura’ - a Nigerian cereal food. Pak J Nutr. (2008) 7:9–12. doi: 10.3923/pjn.2008.9.12

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Sewak, A, Singla, N, Javed, M, and Gill, GS. Suitability of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) based food products for diabetics. Acta Aliment. (2023) 52:366–77. doi: 10.1556/066.2022.00144

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Mubiru, D, Recha, T, and Atieno Otieno, G. Sensory evaluation of finger millet and bean products in Hoima Uganda In: Report of field work conducted 6–12 September 2019 (2019)

Google Scholar

47. Rawat, M, Varshney, A, Rai, M, Chikara, A, Pohty, AL, Joshi, A, et al. A comprehensive review on nutraceutical potential of underutilized cereals and cereal- based products. J Agric Food Res. (2023) 12:100619. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100619

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Jaybhaye, RV, Pardeshi, IL, Vengaiah, PC, and Srivastav, PP. Processing and technology for millet based food products: a review. J Ready Eat Food. (2014) 1:32–48.

Google Scholar

49. Bekele, EK, Nosworthy, MG, Henry, CJ, Shand, PJ, and Tyler, RT. Oxidative stability of direct-expanded chickpea sorghum snacks. Food Sci Nutr. (2020) 8:4340–51. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1731

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Rani, S, Singh, R, Kaur, BP, and Upadhyay, A. Pearl millet processing: a review. Nutr Food Sci. (2018) 48:30–44. doi: 10.1108/NFS-04-2017-0070

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Goyal, P, and Chug, L. Shelf-life determinants and enzyme activites of pearl millet: a comparison of changes in stored flours of hybrids CMS lines, in breds and composities. J Food Sci Technol. (2017) 54:3161–9. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2752-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Sobana, RM. Quality evaluation of millet based composite sports bar. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2017) 2:65–8.

Google Scholar

53. Hegde, RM. Nutritional composition and antioxidant potential of karonda (Carissa spp.) fruit and its processed products (doctoral dissertation). Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University (2020).

Google Scholar

54. Rao, PV, and Devi, PU. Improving nutritional quality of millet-based products using pulses: a review. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2019) 10:1080

Google Scholar

Keywords: chickpea, Kodo millet, nutrition composition, recommended dietary allowance, value-added products, sensory evaluation

Citation: Rana D, Aggarwal R, Kaur H, Sewak A, Bains K and Dhaliwal IK (2025) Redesigning traditional grains: a functional approach to protein quality using Kodo millet and chickpeas. Front. Nutr. 12:1638750. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1638750

Received: 04 July 2025; Accepted: 12 September 2025;
Published: 28 October 2025.

Edited by:

Agnes Mwangwela, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Malawi

Reviewed by:

Yessica Enciso-Martínez, University of Sonora, Mexico
Faroque M. D. Mohsin, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
Ashoka S., College of Agriculture, India
Kajal Srivastava, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India

Copyright © 2025 Rana, Aggarwal, Kaur, Sewak, Bains and Dhaliwal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aditi Sewak, YWRpdGktZm5AcGF1LmVkdQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.