ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1645824
This article is part of the Research TopicSpaces for Sustainable Food Systems and Healthy DietsView all 4 articles
Mapping of the adherence to the Planetary Health Diet in 11 European countries: comparison of different diet quality indices as a result of the PLAN'EAT project
Provisionally accepted- 1Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economy Analysis | CREA, Rome, Italy
- 2Universita degli Studi del Molise Dipartimento Agricoltura Ambiente e Alimenti, Campobasso, Italy
- 3Universita degli Studi di Torino Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie Forestali e Alimentari, Grugliasco, Italy
- 4Universita Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- 5Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
INTRODUCTION The Planetary Health Diet (PHD) is a nutritional approach integrating public health and environmental sustainability aspects. This study, conducted within the European PLAN'EAT project, aimed to assess adherence to PHD in 11 European countries. METHODS Three dietary quality indices were used: the EAT-Lancet index, the original WISH and a newly developed version, WISH 2.0. This last index incorporates two additional food categories: processed meat and alcoholic beverages. The inclusion of these categories was driven by their recognized public health and environmental relevance. The food consumption data was retrieved from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database. Scores were calculated and normalized to carry out descriptive and comparative analyses. Cluster analyses were also performed to examine dietary patterns’ differences by country and gender. RESULTS Low adherence to PHD was observed across all countries. However, Southern European countries such as Italy, Greece, and Spain showed comparatively higher adherence particularly among the females’ groups. Cluster analyses, based on EAT-Lancet and WISH 2.0 scores, highlighted regional and gender patterns. These findings emphasize the cultural specificity of dietary behaviors. The two indices have different discriminating capacity. From the EAT-Lancet index higher average normalized scores were obtained. WISH 2.0 could distinguish between different dietary patterns and was better aligned with actual food consumption data, demonstrating an enhanced capacity to better detect national dietary patterns more accurately. DISCUSSION These results underscore the potential of WISH 2.0 as a comprehensive and practical instrument for mapping and monitoring dietary quality in Europe. Additionally, the findings indicate that adapting global dietary guidelines to local contexts may be essential to improve population-level adherence and policy relevance.
Keywords: Dietary patterns, Diet indices, Health, sustainability, PLAN'EAT project, European countries, Cluster analysis. Words: 7688 Figures: 6 Table: 1 Table in supplementary material: 10
Received: 12 Jun 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Grant, Aureli, Di Veroli and Rossi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jacopo Niccolò Di Veroli, Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economy Analysis | CREA, Rome, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.