Toward a roadmap for addressing today's health dilemma–The 101-statement consensus report

Abstract

Importance:

In recent decades there has been an expansion in the quantity and quality of scientific findings and guidelines on different health topics to promote individual and public health status. Reports also indicate that there has been a simultaneous increase in the financial burden of disease, including trillions spent on healthcare resources by governments worldwide (predominantly in developing countries) to address health concerns. At the same time, personal health behavior is well-known as efficient and cost-free, holding four times the potential to prevent early death compared to health care. Despite this knowledge, data show that the increasing prevalence of unhealthy lifestyles and the associated chronic diseases, especially in Western societies, still need to be controlled. This circumstance exemplifies today‘s global health dilemma, which alarms the inadequacy of ongoing efforts to address the existing health concerns worldwide.

Setting, insights, and observations:

Three international, multidisciplinary, and inter-university events (two scientific conferences and one tertiary education symposium) were held in Austria (Innsbruck) between 2020 and 2022 to discourse, discuss, and debate these concerns. Two hundred eighty-four experts from 76 universities, organizations, and stakeholders spanning 31 nations and five continents participated in this international research and knowledge exchange to address today's global health dilemma. The latest scientific findings were discussed to develop practical strategies for improving lifestyle behavior and focus on the dual “Healthy Eating & Active Living” approach as a minimum recommendation for sustainable lifelong health and care. The expert panel debated crucial research priorities and future policies, identified gaps and untapped potential in basic health approaches that have been grossly neglected, and approved the evidence-based 101 consensus statements presented.

Conclusions and relevance:

These endeavors aim to develop novel and effective interventions that address the needs of individuals and communities and promote optimal health status.

Highlights

• To address the global health dilemma of increasing non-communicable (chronic) diseases despite growing advances in health science and healthcare budgets, it is the consensus of the panel of experts that the power of Lifestyle Medicine has the potential to significantly contribute to the “Prevention First” appeal. The dual approach to sustainable and lifelong health—“Healthy Eating & Active Living”—is the minimum recommendation inclusive of every individual for better public health.

• To maximize health benefits for all, the permanent linkage of “Healthy Eating” is, at best, whole food plant-predominant, preferably vegetarian/vegan, and “Active Living” is, at best, daily and outdoors/in nature.

• This consensus statement aligns with the current trend towards de-medicalized and more holistic, personalized approaches to health and well-being, focusing on sustainable preventative policies.

1 Introduction, aims and methods

Despite groundbreaking accomplishments in science and technology over recent decades (1–4) health professionals currently face various challenges in addressing public health issues. These include financial interests, which can bias decision-making or priority-setting; difficulties in disseminating conclusive research to policy makers and the public in a timely and effective manner; and professional hubris, where overconfidence in expertise may hinder collaboration or the consideration of alternative approaches (5–9). Together, these factors have contributed to the increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and particularly their underlying risk factors (5–9). These challenges are primarily due to the broad and complex interface of health science disciplines and the contradictory viewpoints on health priorities. By bringing together experts and health professionals from diverse areas and communities through common ground, various foci could be openly linked in addressing current health issues of pressing concern.

The present paper reports the consensus and theme-specific results of three international, multidisciplinary, and cross-university events (10, 11) that hosted 284 internationally recognized experts from 76 universities, stakeholders, and organizations (including the WHO Regional Office for Europe) around the world (31 nations, five continents):

• (1) “Health and Wellbeing: Addressing today's Global Paradox. Visioning an International Research and Knowledge Exchange”. 6. February 2020, 1-day hybrid conference, Innsbruck, Austria.

• (2) “Improving Child and Adolescent Health for Better Public Health—Fiction or Within the Scope of Possibility? The perspective of a lifestyle-centered approach for Addressing Today's Global Health Paradox”. 10–11. November 2020, 2-day e-conference, Innsbruck, Austria.

• (3) “The future in (y)our hands. Improved public health arises through better health of every individual. A tertiary education symposium about the future of human and planetary health”. 8. June 2022, 1-day hybrid conference, Innsbruck, Austria.

Through a consensus-generating approach (Figure 1, Supplementary Appendix S1), the experts (i) discussed the latest scientific findings including existing limitations in health approaches, (ii) identified gaps and untapped potentials in encouraging approaches that have been neglected, (iii) debated the necessity of specific and crucial research priorities, (iv) foresighted policies supporting novel and promising scientific and practical efforts, and (v) weighed on developing practical strategies to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors in everyday scenarios at different levels and settings with a specific emphasis on holistic and integrated health perspectives, particularly the preventative dual approach of “Healthy Eating & Active Living” (13–15) for sustainable, lifelong health and wellbeing.

Figure 1

The overarching aim of the congresses, within the context of an international research and knowledge exchange, was to establish direct statements to address today's global health dilemma—in the present context to be understood as a systemic paradox rather than a binary choice—which explores why growing advances in health science and increasing healthcare budgets do not adequately control the increasing prevalence of NCDs. This dilemma confronts policymakers and health care systems with competing, often undesirable trade-offs at the focal point of prevention, treatment, and long-term sustainability. Accordingly, it has been agreed that developing an evidence-based consensus statement outlining novel and effective intervention approaches to address the healthcare needs of individuals and communities is crucial for providing a scientific basis to promote an individual's optimal health status and improve the public health of nations worldwide. The aim was to focus on innovative interventions for improving the health outcomes of individuals and populations worldwide, which would reduce the social, ecological, and monetary burden of chronic diseases. As the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) once famously exclaimed, “Health is not everything, but without health, everything is nothing.”

2 Background to the issue

2.1 Today's global health dilemma

Health is the natural aspiration of the human being from birth. Over the past few decades, the world has witnessed a shift in the primary focus of health concerns from infectious to chronic diseases, specifically NCDs (9, 16, 17). To control health problems, governments and international health organizations have established various policies over the past decades that have led to a general incline in healthcare budgets worldwide (18, 19) and are projected to cumulate to USD 15 trillion by 2050 (20). Accordingly, there has been rapid growth in the quantity and quality of health and medical investigations in recent decades (21, 22). Despite significant improvements in several areas of health sciences, such as sanitization/hygiene (23), neonatal health care practices (24), vaccination programs (25), and cancer screening (26), there are still gaps between the practical and applicable understanding of disease causes, the identification of biological markers of their presence and stage, and specific indicators influencing the effectiveness of potential remedies (27, 28). Therefore, the high-tech medicine of the 21st century has catalyzed today's global health dilemma, where despite significant advancements in health and healthcare, the world still experiences vast preventable deaths, high per-capita health burdens, and substantial financial costs.

In our technology-driven world, advanced and cutting-edge medicines are prioritized. It has been proposed that “omics” technologies, including proteomics, genomics, lipidomics, epigenomics, metabolomics, analysis of the microbiome, modern imaging methods, and physiological monitoring approaches, may once again play an important role, as they have already proven effective in fostering the implementation of precision medicine in daily practice (29–31). Based on this precision medical approach, specialists and physicians should ideally apply personalized treatment and consider the patient's unique physiology, microbial characteristics (viral, fungal, or bacterial properties), and the capacity to metabolize a particular medication and/or drug (31, 32). Contemporary advancements in science indicate the growing need to prioritize personalized approaches in medicine and expand our perspectives toward the person/patient as a whole organism. In 2022, NCDs accounted for 74% of all deaths globally (5); however, sustainably successful medicalized cures for preventable health conditions, particularly chronic health diseases with a more complex and multi-faceted etiology, such as obesity, diabetes type 2, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer, remain rare and elusive (33–36). While the theoretical aspects of modern medicine imply the necessity to apply three principles (diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis) to tackle the burden of diseases (37, 38), many current health approaches, specifically those to manage NCDs, are based on clear-cut diagnoses that often miss the underlying causes and subtler manifestations of illness (28, 39, 40). Such medical practice might lead to significant misinterpretation and may be—in some cases—significantly misleading.

The Continuum Concept, one of the most fundamental principles of physiology, biology, and disease, explains the status of an individual from optimal health to a hidden imbalance, progressing to severe dysfunction, ultimately leading to disease (41). A holistic and systematic approach to pathophysiology could shift models of disease in medicine away from simple associations rooted in empirical reductionism toward an appreciation of network-based models (42). An application of these systemic theoretical concepts in medicine can be seen, for instance, in the emerging field of psychoneuroimmunology, an interdisciplinary area of research exploring the complex interactions between psychological, neural, endocrine, and immune processes (43). While traditional medicine relies on specific regulatory types to handle treatment based on symptoms and the patient's general profile, it is also crucial to recognize cross-cultural factors in preventive and therapeutic approaches, particularly understanding shared and distinct pathological, physiological, and psychological features (44). It has been shown that personal behavior is the predominant determinant of health today, with four-fold the power to prevent premature death compared to healthcare (45, 46). Therefore, to promote overall health and wellness, it is essential to encourage behaviors that benefit the entire complex rather than isolating specific organs, tissues, cells, or structures. Unhealthy lifestyle behavior (e.g., physical inactivity, poor dietary habits, and substance abuse), along with overweight/obesity, is the primary mechanism of the pressing NCD challenge (5, 47, 48). To tackle these global health issues that predominantly track from childhood to old age (49, 50), it is crucial to address the pressing concerns identified by health organizations and experts worldwide (51, 52).

2.2 Health and the power of lifestyle

The desire for a happy and long life (with as few years lived with disability as possible–especially at the end of one's lifespan) has been a fundamental human aspiration and traces back to the beginning of humankind (53). In 1550, however, Luigi Cornaro (an Italian humanist, 1475–1566; Figure 2) reported for the first time that the human lifespan can be extended by making lifestyle modifications (54, 55). This idea is consistent with the current body of science, which indicates that genetics account for 20%−25% of an individual's lifespan, while the remaining 75%−80% is determined by various factors but principally lifestyle (56–58).

Figure 2

Today, the lifestyle medicine concept is a concrete, evidence-based, and comprehensive approach to preventing, treating, and even reversing various diseases by implementing health-promoting behaviors and replacing poor/unhealthy ones that are disadvantageous to health in daily routines. According to the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM), there are six pillars of lifestyle, including a whole-food, plant-predominant eating pattern, physical activity (PA), stress management, positive social relationships, restorative sleep, and the avoidance of risky substances (59, 60) (Figure 3). These six areas form the foundation of the recently designed “Lifestyle Medicine Curriculum,” which has been integrated into medical education (61). Lifestyle medicine aims to reduce dependence on medical treatments such as pharmaceutical therapy (prescribed medication) or surgical strategies by strongly emphasizing health-related behaviors. Instead, Lifestyle Medicine taps the potential of healthy dietary habits, regular PA, stress management techniques, positive relationship reinforcement (solid social support), improving sleep quality, and restricting smoking and alcohol intake (59, 60).

Figure 3

In line with and as an extension of lifestyle medicine, evidence suggests that Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) may significantly manage various health problems (62). TCIM is typically used alongside modern evidence-based medical approaches and is classified into five major categories: “whole medical systems,” “mind-body techniques,” “biologically based practices,” “manipulative and body-based therapies,” and “energy therapies” (63). TCIM (64), which is closely tied to cultural aspects, has received endorsement from the European Union (EU) (65), WHO (66), and other intergovernmental organizations (67–69). Considering that the cost-effectiveness of TCIM-based treatments is approved by the European Parliament (70) and may reduce concerns associated with the rising cost of modern medical practices, such health management approaches should be considered in future healthcare efforts worldwide.

2.3 “Healthy Eating & Active Living”

As one key component of a healthy lifestyle, a person's diet has the power of medicine and has thus been applied in treating various health conditions beyond preventative effects (71–76). Dietary patterns (e.g., type of diet: omnivorous, vegetarian) have always been influenced by food preferences and availabilities of geographical, sociocultural, economic, and religious factors (77–79), which have uncovered the complexity of defining a healthy diet (80–86). Available dietary guidelines have consistently emphasized replacing unhealthy food options with healthy ones (e.g., fruits, vegetables, whole grains, beans, legumes and pulses, nuts, and seeds) (81–91). While there are wide discrepancies in defining a healthy diet (71, 78), it has been well-documented that a whole-food plant-predominant (WFPP) diet (most significantly through a vegetarian or vegan pattern) is a general description for a healthy dietary approach (14, 84, 92–97). Notwithstanding the clarifications provided by scientific evidence, several misconceptions persist regarding the adverse health effects of transitioning to a vegetarian diet, especially a vegan one. However, such beliefs may lack scientific rigor, as they often result from a limited understanding of how to choose a diverse array of plant foods as substitutes for animal-sourced foods, as well as the potential for unbalanced and poorly planned dietary regimens, which can occur in any diet (93, 98). As so-called critical nutrients of the vegan diet (e.g., iron, iodine, calcium, vitamin D, vitamin B12) are not more problematic than any other diet type, it appears that vegans are at no exceptional risk for deficiency with a well-composed, wholesome diet appropriately supplemented by vitamin B12 (93). Hence, regardless of diet type, nutritional inadequacy usually emerges from other factors, primarily based on individually misapplied dietary behaviors (99–101).

A well-planned healthy diet has been documented as the most simple, safe, accessible, and affordable way to prevent and treat various diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and the associated risk factors, including hypertension, hyperglycemia, and obesity (14, 88–90, 102, 103). Conversely, poor or unhealthy diets significantly contribute to global mortality, with dietary risks identified as one of the leading risk factors for death and disability, accounting for 20% of the cases worldwide (47, 104). For instance, data show that cardiovascular diseases, the world's leading causes of death over the past two decades (104, 105), are reversible by diet alone but only when adhering to a healthy, WFPP (especially vegan) diet (106–108). Healthcare approaches are highly connected to medical education. Nowadays, medical education and training seem to be primarily disease-centered, based on the specific knowledge of diseases and medical approaches. At the same time, health promotion is almost absent in curricular-determined learning and training content, which is a reflection of out-of-date education and practice (109–112). Results from a systematic review show that medical students lack the competence to provide high-quality, adequate nutrition and lifestyle care (113). Such circumstances have directed healthcare systems toward being more reactive than proactive, prioritizing treatment of illnesses over prevention, ultimately resulting in massive expenses to medically intervene (114–116). However, since 2019, policymakers in the EU emphasized the urgent need for more significant and more pressing efforts toward a shift to the prevention of ill health and disease and pose health promotion as a key pillar in ensuring future public health across nations (114). Accordingly, there has been an emphasis on lifestyle-based approaches that need to be included in the current healthcare system and the associated medication-based, disease-centered programs (117–119). The American Medical Association (AMA) consistently advocated for implementing plant-predominant meal options in hospitals and medical facilities (120). This initiative extends beyond merely improving the health of patients, staff, and visitors while encouraging the elimination of animal products from the menu (120). However, today's health dilemma has also raised concerns among primary care physicians and pediatricians regarding vegan/vegetarian nutrition, primarily due to a lack of detailed academic education on critical topics. The lack of compulsory education covering the depth of vegetarian dietary patterns and health makes it challenging for medical doctors to effectively support, recommend, or interact with individuals following non-omnivorous dietary patterns (98, 119, 121).

The history of reporting on plant-predominant diets dates back over 2,500 years, when Pythagoras introduced the philosophy of vegetarianism based on his observations (98). This nature-based philosophy, which generally prevailed until the 19th century, often recommended diets predominantly composed of plant foods to maintain health and wellbeing as well as alleviate and heal disorders and diseases (98, 122). However, during the past century (especially after World War II), profound changes in dietary habits have occurred worldwide: mainly including changes from (i) meals to snacks, (ii) eating at home to eating out, (iii) eating fruits and vegetables (plant-rich diets) to eating more animal foods; and (iv) eating intact, fresh, and organic foods to processed and industrialized products high in sugar, salt, (saturated) fats, and preservatives (78, 95, 123, 124). These changes, which have been associated with the increasing prevalence of NCDs and the risk factors for global mortality (5, 6, 125, 126), have led to the emergence of a vast number of research efforts since 1978, investigating and displaying evidence on the effectiveness of different types of diets, especially plant-predominant diets on sustainable health promotion (92, 100–103, 127–134) and longevity (108, 135, 136). Blue zones (specific locations around the world with populations living significantly longer and in good physical condition) are natural examples of the relationship between plant-predominant diets and healthy longevity (137, 138). Regarding the sustainability aspect of dietary maintenance, the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems is considered a giant step (139). Even more recently, the European Commission (EC) has advocated Food 2030 as a framework for research and innovation policies, aiming to facilitate the transition toward sustainable, nutritious, and inclusive food systems (140). Furthermore, the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) summary report for policymakers highlights that shifting to a plant-predominant diet across all socio-ecological levels holds the most significant potential to protect individual and global health, promote human sustainability, including mitigating infectious diseases, epidemics, pandemics, and resource depletion along with increasing active mobility and other beneficial actions for health (141–143).

In parallel with the occurrence of dietary changes over the past century, the advancements and implications of technology in the daily routines of human beings have developed a new health concern worldwide called “sedentary lifestyle” (144). The effect of PA, sports, and exercise on NCDs has been widely studied over recent decades, and it has been proven that physical exercise is a versatile and effective treatment of NCDs, thus considered as medicine (145–151). As a crucial part of a healthy lifestyle nowadays, PA, sports, and exercise are critical factors in maintaining physical, physiological, and mental health and wellbeing across the life course, which is influenced by interpersonal and environmental factors (152–154). Rather than having specific and direct benefits for health, natural settings for performing PA, sports, and exercise promote health-enhancing behavior (155–160). There is scientific agreement that properly planned and regularly carried out PA (at best daily and outdoors/in nature) seems to act as a preventive measure, delaying or avoiding the onset of certain diseases, and as an effective treatment for subjects already affected by NCDs by increasing the quality of life, slowing down the progression of illness, and/or eradicating it (146–151, 158, 159). According to the general health guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) (145, 154), adults are recommended to comply with at least 150 min of moderate-intensity PA per week distributed over at least 3 days (at best, a minimum of 20 min daily) (161–163), while children and adolescents (aged 5–17 years) are advised to engage in at least 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA daily, with mostly continuous activities involving large muscle groups.

Research advancements in health behavior have revealed the cumulative health benefits of PA and diet when applied simultaneously. Specifically, a healthy diet and regular PA, each as a single, 1-dimensional strategy, not only play independent roles in preventing and treating NCDs and associated risk factors per se, but their combination brings about additional synergistic benefits (164–166). This fact suggests the adoption and adherence of a holistic approach to health behavior by integrating all areas of lifestyle medicine, with a particular focus on the two main pillars of sustainable health–“Healthy Eating & Active Living”–forms the minimum recommendation to start one's engagement toward better health behaviors, habits, and patterns (Figure 3) (13–15, 165–172). This dual approach to sustainable and lifelong health is in line with contemporary views on human physiology and health (173–175), which requires a systemic perspective that integrates multimodal data from various entities to create a network functioning in health and disease and to explore its dynamic responses to disturbances (176). These integrative and multidimensional interactions shape the system's behavior and must be considered comprehensively over time, space, and the context of appearance (177, 178). Therefore, a holistic, de-medicalized, and systemic approach to health could move models of preventive and therapeutic strategies from simple associations rooted in empirical reductionism toward the appreciation of network-based models (29, 45, 179–182).

2.4 Environmental and ethical concerns in health promotion efforts

The benefits of healthy lifestyle behavior are not limited to the promotion of individual health or the public health of nations. Each component of a healthy lifestyle (e.g., consumption of plant foods, regular engagement in PA, sports, and exercise, etc.) considers ethical, social, and ecological aspects directly and indirectly (183–185). The United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) mainly aim to end (#1) poverty and (#2) hunger globally (186). To do so, however, the most critical steps are achieving (#3) good health and wellbeing simultaneously with (#4) quality education (186), especially for women (187). From a broader perspective, personal health behavior is connected to planetary health and can significantly contribute to preserving and maintaining human development (185, 188). In parallel, ecosystem changes, particularly climate changes (primarily originating from human behavior over the past century), pose a significant threat to human health (188–191). In addition to increasing the likelihood of natural disasters (192), anthropogenic climate change has gradually led to environmental alterations, such as air pollution, loss of biodiversity, resource depletion, more frequent and heightened heatwaves, deforestation, and exacerbating water shortages, which may result in a wide range of health concerns, including instability and insecurity of resources, particularly food insecurity (180, 187, 188). However, the implementation of holistic solutions that consider synergies and trade-offs to target the United Nations' SDGs (181) and simultaneously address health and climate change challenges is restricted by the lack of action by decision-makers at both the national and global levels (189, 193–196). The WHO estimates that between 2030 and 2050, climate change will cause an additional 250,000 deaths globally each year due to malnutrition, infectious diseases, and heat stress (197). Children are among the most vulnerable populations, as recent reports from UNICEF indicate that about one billion children worldwide are at high risk of the impacts associated with climate change (198).

With a new and future-oriented holistic and de-medicalized lifestyle approach, critical concerns about animal testing in the pursuit of scientific progress could be addressed and tackled. Since the Medieval era, animal experimentation has driven medical research and justified medical progress. It is still considered the gold standard to advance knowledge in various fields, such as life science, medicine, agriculture, or product safety (199, 200). In 2012, almost half of the National Institute of Health's funding was allocated to testing that involved animal use (201). Today, however, there is ongoing questioning about the contemporaneity of vivisection and the utility and ethical acceptability of invasive animal research. Irrespective of ethical concerns regarding the justifiability of animal experiments in research activities, animal experimentation may not align with precision medicine approaches, which focus on the genetic diversity of human populations and inter-individual differences based on non-hereditary alterations during the life course (29, 30). This fact is evident, for example, in many human-specific diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes, cystic fibrosis, and hemophilia A, which do not appear in animals (202, 203).

Furthermore, evidence shows that most (up to 95%) pharmaceutical drugs found effective and safe in animal studies fail in subsequent clinical phases in human populations, mainly due to insufficient efficacy, toxicity, and the emergence of unacceptable adverse drug reactions, raising significant concerns for ethical and economic reasons (204–211). This failure is predominantly attributed to the limitations of animal models in accurately representing human physiology during preclinical evaluations (211). It should also be considered that even if a drug is approved, safe use on humans is not guaranteed, as about one-third of the approved drugs are later withdrawn from sale or have warnings issued due to serious side effects (212). In September 2021, the European Parliament passed a resolution with 99% support to phase out animal testing across member countries, focusing on plans and actions to accelerate the transition to innovation without using animals in research, regulatory testing, and education (213). The EC is currently preparing a roadmap for phasing out animal studies for chemical safety testing in 15 legislative domains, which will be published at the beginning of 2026 (214). The EC responds to the European Parliament and the European Citizen Initiative to commit to a Europe without animal testing, collecting more than 1.2 million signatures from citizens (215). As a preparation, several transdisciplinary recommendations on how to become successful have already been published (216). Similarly, in December 2022, U.S. President Biden signed the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 into law, with strong bipartisan support, to speed up the discovery process, lower the costs of new life-saving treatments, and reduce animal testing (217). As a follow-up, an FDA roadmap has been published, stating that in 3–5 years time human-relevant testing methods (non-animal New Approach Methods) will be the default for safety/toxicity testing instead of animal studies (218). The National Institutes of Health in the US have followed suit in prioritizing the development and use of human-relevant testing methods by stating that projects only encompassing animal studies will no longer be funded (219).

2.5 Health education

Health education is not solely limited to the medical society, including healthcare practitioners. Children, adolescents, and young adults are widely recognized as vulnerable populations regarding health behavior, and promoting their health is crucial for their growth and future human development (220–223). Given that young people spend most of their daily activities in school as well as other educational contexts throughout a significant portion of their lifetime (224), it is essential to understand that schools and universities are vital settings for delivering health-related knowledge and developing competencies through adequate and effective education and training (220–222). Moving to a higher educational level may also bring about challenges regarding significant life changes in peer social circles and social pressures as well as educational environments, assignments, and facilities, thus permitting quick-fix, unhealthy lifestyle choices (225–227). However, the opportunity to provide education and training on healthy lifestyle behavior seamlessly linked from kindergarten, primary, and secondary school to college and university remains available according to national curricula, and it is yet to be fulfilled (221, 228). The WHO recommendations on health education emphasize that school and educational policies should support the adoption and maintenance of healthy lifestyle behaviors as a requirement for improving public health (220) and thus created the standard of “Health promoting schools” (WHO's Global School Health Initiative), launched in 1995 (229). Kindergartens, schools, and universities are living, working, and, at best, health-promoting environments that provide an optimal educational context for shaping lifelong healthy lifestyle behavior (230–232). Likewise, through educational efforts, the public is entitled to know about the controversy surrounding disease definitions and evaluations and the self-limiting and relatively benign natural course of many health conditions (233). Overall compulsory education is the optimum period (8–15 years in Europe) (234) in the life cycle where young people can be educated, trained, and empowered for healthy lifestyle behavior (234–236).

Nowadays, based on the overarching educational goal of “health promotion” as a curricular state mandate of many Western nations, it is therefore relevant that all compulsory subjects are competence-oriented and applied from the primary level to secondary level II (237–239). However, the central issue in translating conclusive, health-related scientific evidence into robust behaviors in adults and older adults is the reduced ability to learn new healthy behaviors after childhood and adolescence (240–243). Along with this, aptly formulated ancient wisdom was proclaimed by Confucius, a Chinese philosopher, politician, and educator: “If your plan is for 1 year, plant rice. If your plan is for 10 years, plant trees. If your plan is for 100 years, educate children.” Typically, compared to adults, health conditions may have a higher value in infancy, childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood, during which an individual faces several changes and transition phases. Outside of young people's family/guardianship and upbringing, it is generally recognized that early-stage education is critical for establishing long-term, health-related knowledge, skills, and competencies to achieve health policies. Developing a sustainable and lifelong health-related action readiness is essential, as well as the willingness to act wholesome; as the German writer Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832) stated: “Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.”

3 101 evidence-based consensus statements and research priorities

Table 1 presents a condensed overview of the 101 evidence-based consensus statements and research priorities along with respective rating the quality-level of evidence (Quality Rating Scheme for Studies and Other Evidence, modified from Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, with ratings from 1: properly powered and conducted randomized clinical trial/systematic review with meta-analysis; to 5: opinion of respected authorities; case reports).

4 Overview and discussion

4.1 Summary

The three international congresses of research and knowledge exchanges between 2020 and 2022 aimed to contribute evidence-based consensus statements to address today's global health dilemma (rating quality of evidence see Table 1). These congresses were held to improve the individual's optimal state of health, which would cumulatively reduce the social, ecological, and monetary burden of chronic diseases in the mid- and long-term, ultimately resulting in better public health on a global scale. Considering the limitations and neglected gaps in current health-related approaches, this panel has proposed practical strategies that prioritize a holistic and integrated health perspective, specifically focusing on key elements of sustainable health behavior outlined in this report. Accordingly, research priorities and policies for future scientific and practical efforts have also been suggested.

The evidence-based statements developed by this consortium encompass various topics concerning sustainable health behavior and the improvement of global health, including general considerations on and approaches toward a good state of health (theme 1), the minimum (primary, key) behaviors associated with good health: “Healthy Eating & Active Living” (themes 2 and 3), other important, non-energy-balance-mediated lifestyle behaviors (theme 4), health education and literacy as critical aspects associated with good health and wellbeing (theme 5), and research priorities (theme 6). Regarding basic approaches, the statements (n = 22) generally emphasize the value of addressing health behavior as a complex and dynamic phenomenon shaped by individual, social, and environmental factors. This requires a focus from individual-level interventions, such as goal setting and self-monitoring, to broader population-level approaches that aim to change health-related social norms and policies concerning care. Regarding healthy eating, the statements (n = 19) highlight the importance of an adequate healthy diet considered medicine for various lifestyle disorders/conditions. Strategies for promoting healthy eating emphasize whole-food, plant-predominant diets and include nutrition education and policy initiatives such as subsidies for healthy foods and restrictions on marketing unhealthy products. For active living, the statements (n = 15) emphasize the importance of regular PA for improving and maintaining good health and reducing the likelihood of the associated risk factors. Strategies for promoting PA include environmental and policy changes, such as improving access to safe and convenient places for PA engagement. Other health behaviors addressed in the statements (n = 12) include sleep, stress management, relationships, and substance abuse. These areas highlight the need for a holistic and contemporary approach to health that addresses a cognizant range of lifestyle factors that contribute to overall health and wellbeing. In health education and literacy, the statements (n = 14) emphasize the need for effective communication and health literacy skills to promote behavior change and informed decision-making. This area includes the importance of tailoring evidence-based health information and messages to individual needs and preferences, ensuring its accessibility and distribution at all educational levels. Finally, the statements highlight the importance of research in advancing our understanding of health behavior and informing effective interventions (n = 19). This includes the need for interdisciplinary collaboration, rigorous methodology, and consideration of various critical factors in research designs and implementation. Overall, the 101 statements provide an in-depth overview of the essential de-medicalized factors involved in promoting and maintaining good health through behavior, with a particular focus on the dual approach of sustainable and lifelong health and wellbeing and the associated educational and communal considerations on the simple formula of “Healthy Eating & Active Living.” By addressing the complex and multi-faceted nature of health behavior and highlighting effective strategies for promoting behavior change, these statements offer valuable insights and guidance for researchers, practitioners, decision-makers, and policymakers in the field of public health.

4.2 From individual to public health

The dual approach of “Healthy Eating (at best, WFPP, and preferably vegetarian/vegan) and Active Living (at best daily and outdoors/in nature)” is a scientifically informed strategy that is well-known as promising due to its unique health benefits (13–15, 155–163, 165–172). The approach emphasizes the codependent and continuous application of healthy dietary patterns and regular engagement in PA, sports, and exercise, which serves to address the dynamic interplay between energy intake and expenditure (163, 238). By avoiding the development of NCDs and the risk factors, the dual approach is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of preventive medicine, public health, and care practice. It highlights the significance of a holistic perspective that integrates various dimensions and interactions to generate network models of health and disease functioning (43, 45, 167, 273). Therefore, “Healthy Eating & Active Living” displays the minimum recommendation to unlock and begin tapping into the full potential of the power of lifestyle organization and change to improve one's health at the individual level from childhood into adulthood and old age (50). This, in turn, can contribute to prioritizing the person (and/or patient) centered approach over disease (and/or medication-) centered and thus shaping better public health of nations. Figure 4 displays the most relevant target groups in accordance with and derived from models of the determinants of health (29, 179, 180, 252, 268). With the potential to shift from a patient- and disease-centered approach to a preventive person-centered health approach, the model spans all levels and units of action to achieve better public health of nations that emerge from improved individual health.

Figure 4

Consistent with the saying “you can't teach an old dog new tricks,” childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood are extremely sensitive life stages for ingraining healthy behavior. However, the challenge of the behavior change process remains significant for adults to cope with (Figure 5), and considering that relapses may occur (and at various stages), the successful adoption of new healthy behavior and the complete termination of previous unhealthy behavior is rare (Stage 6). Therefore, defining behavior change success is suggested to be any forward progression in the model rather than focusing solely on reaching the final stage of termination. Indeed, when the power of personal behavior at its lowest range estimate (the cause of 40% of all deaths) exceeds all other determinants of health (29, 30), including the health care system (10%), environment (5%), social circumstances (15%), and genetics (30%), the pursuit of addressing this challenge becomes even more crucial.

Figure 5

4.3 Current and future health approaches

The introduction of novel medications and drugs stimulates economic growth, creates employment opportunities, and contributes to the overall success of the capitalist system (274, 275). As a matter of fact, it is valuable for companies, especially in terms of profitability, to prioritize the continuous treatment of individuals with long-term health issues using modern medical products, rather than addressing preventive and sustainable health behavior across different societal levels—a challenge often encountered in the field of medicine (275–278). This consequence is especially apparent when comparing the impact of different health determinant domains on money spent in billions annually, e.g., behavior has a 38% annual impact (equivalent to USD 260 billion), while medical care has an 11% annual impact (or total USD 3,337 billion) (29). The mainstream media may play a key role in investigating and promoting contemporary medical activities while neglecting the primary mechanism of NCDs (274). In today's case, industrialization is successful with its crucial strategy of hidden and unregulated attempts to change public perceptions about health and illness (276–278). In Europe and the US, prescribed medications rank as the third leading cause of death right after heart disease and cancer, with approximately half of these deaths due to taking the medication correctly as prescribed, while the other half of these deaths are due to overdoses or drug abuse (274, 279). Interestingly, around 70%−80% of psychotropic (including antidepressant) medications are prescribed in primary care practices (280). The adverse combination of medical universities aligning closely with their university-industry partnerships, and the emphasis on patents rather than public-interest science, is quite evident (274). Often, the industry's conflict of interest is apparent rather than subtle since disease prevention, non-drug-dependent methods lack commercial interest, as healthy people have little-to-no dependency and are not lucrative clients for the medication industry (279). Healthcare and medicine must evolve into a proactive public health system that is predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory (P4 model) (263). Therefore, it is crucial to step back from a fragmented and merely reactive health approach, which involves minimal interactions among specialists, often resulting in non-concerted prescriptions and scattered follow-ups. This approach also limits the information available to primary/family care physicians, therapists, and individuals/patients, ultimately leading to a suboptimal cost-effectiveness ratio. Along with the Hodges' model (a comprehensive framework offering a practical approach for learners and professionals considering health and aligned with the SDGs) that navigates healthcare complexities, transcends boundaries, encompasses various literacies, and fosters interdisciplinary connections (273), the integrated “P4 Health Spectrum” model promises to reduce the significant burden of NCDs and increase healthy aging and the health span (263).

Currently, the public health community partially relies on commercial determinants of health, specifically factors influenced by profit motives and monetary gain (281). In fact, many countries with tax-financed public health systems are increasingly facing social and health care inequalities due to profit and privatization-oriented health care reforms (282). In the ongoing conflict concerning the detrimental impact of commercial interests on health, particularly advertising strategies used by tobacco, alcohol, processed food, and sugary beverage entities, it's important to note that these influences drive (and often control) not only what to eat and drink but also individual access to health services (29, 180). It is well-documented that the process of ultra-processing food is predominantly associated with a loss of its nutritional value (283, 284). Currently, in the USA, Canada, and the UK, half or more of dietary energy comes from ultra-processed food products, and the production and consumption of these products are rapidly increasing worldwide (276–278). When introduced into young people's lives, for example, sugar-sweetened beverages contribute significantly to the development of overweight/obesity in children and adolescents (243, 285, 286). Obesity can cause severe diseases in childhood and adolescence and is a risk factor for obesity, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, diabetes mellitus, and other chronic diseases in adulthood (287). Evidence indicates substantial health benefits associated with improving nutrition during the early stages of life, including the promotion of breastfeeding and the improvement of the quality of early childhood feeding (288). Eating habits, mainly shaped by the domestic environment, often persist throughout life (257). Adopting a healthy eating approach can positively affect other aspects of lifestyle, resulting in an overall healthier lifestyle, and can practically serve as a key factor in the transition to and adoption of other health-promoting behaviors, such as better sleep, increased PA/exercise levels, reduced stress levels/better resilience, and a lower likelihood of engaging in substance abuse (72, 76–78).

By embracing such an effective de-medicalized approach to health (i.e., “Healthy Eating & Active Living”), preventive and therapeutic models can surpass empirical reductionism (253, 289). To meet this, it seems crucial for any therapeutic approach to consider and effectively apply the three-to-one ratio (Figure 6): three competence-orientated areas of health-related actions, including—first and foremost—the prevention of diseases, maintenance of good health status, and promotion of health, followed by one, as a last resort, medicalized therapeutic strategies (as a fourth area of competence-orientated actions) to target specific health conditions, including curing and healing diseases. Consistent with this “prevention first” appeal (182, 184), EU policymakers have already identified and emphasized (i) the urgent need for greater and more pressing efforts toward a shift to the prevention of ill-health and disease with health promotion as a key pillar in ensuring future public health (114, 118), and (ii) the cross-European need to focus on changes in future medical and health pedagogy to address the current public health gaps (262, 290).

Figure 6

In line with the statement of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief medical advisor of the US, “the first thing is to stick with the science” (interviewed by the NEJM); therefore, it is imperative to follow the conclusive evidence on healthy lifestyle behavior when considering disease prevention, health maintenance, and the promotion of good health altogether (291). Sticking to the science, however, is long overdue in the promotion of better public health of nations worldwide, except for the science of a specialized therapy, especially when dealing with preventable diseases, which, in such cases, intervention is often too little, too late. A current Lancet comment states that it is not enough to talk about change, and thus tertiary entities need to act in helping society to grow and tap its potential for change (292). As crucial platform not only to empower future health-professionals but individuals for a healthier life, too, colleges and universities play a pivotal role in establishing the provision and transition to evidence-based information about the health-related power of lifestyle medicine and lifestyle behaviors as foundation for informed lifestyle choices. In this regard, universities must advocate for the plant-predominant dietary transition as one key pillar of empowering people for a healthy life, starting with students and academic staff (292, 293). Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an ongoing debate regarding the question of how firmly scientific findings and recommendations for primary care practice are rooted in high-quality, research-based evidence (294–296). It has been reported that only 18% of the recommendations for primary care practice are based on patient-oriented evidence from consistent, high-quality studies (294). Consistently, findings from a study assessing changes in the quality of evidence in updates of Cochrane reviews indicate that only a minority of outcomes for healthcare interventions are backed by high-quality evidence (9.9%), and the quality of the evidence does not consistently show improvement or deterioration in updated reviews (251). Another study indicates that over 90% of healthcare interventions examined in recent Cochrane Reviews lack robust support from high-quality evidence, and there is insufficient reporting of associated harms (297). Moreover, in various scientific domains, research findings are frequently presumed to reflect the prevailing bias (298), and a significant number of published results may be false or exaggerated (277, 278, 299–301), with an estimated 85% of research resources being wasted (302). However, it is inconceivable to envision modern healthcare without considering evidence-based medicine (269), and readers of journals should exercise caution when interpreting research findings (303). The adoption of large-scale collaborative research, standardization of definitions and analyses, pilot examination of interventions, and improvement in study design standards, peer review, reporting, and dissemination of research have been identified as crucial actions to enhance the validity of scientific works (302). The recent planning of the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative is a great example of aiming to combine evidence synthesis from all fields of research and all countries globally (304). The planning phase was run by Cochrane, Campbell and the Joanna Briggs Institute (Australia) and the execution will start in the fall of 2025 by Wellcome UK, investing 45 million GBP in establishing this global infrastructure. The aim is to work toward better informed decision and policy-making, with the Global South in the lead and sustainability as the major focus point.

4.4 Scientific and educational animal use

Since “man is not a mouse” (305, 306), an advanced, fit-for-future, holistic, and de-medicalized health and care approach requires methods free of animal testing, as animal experiments no longer meet today's bio-technological standards regarding the advancement of medical and human sciences. In line with the well-documented incompatibility between animal experiments and human trials (209, 307, 308), current evidence from systematic reviews identified significant limitations in preclinical animal research, encompassing both the quality of publications and translational value (209, 210). Translational percentages (concordance rates) of results exhibit a wide range from 0–100% with no predictable factors for translational success or failure in humans (309), and even multiple experiments fail to significantly contribute to improving the reproducibility of animal testing, accounting for 41%−72% of the observed total variance (310, 311). These results show how misleading animal experimentation can be in terms of human health and emphasize the necessity to study the specific human disease in detail first and, on this basis, select the cost-appropriate, technologically advanced human-relevant model or method (e.g., use of isolated cells and tissues, organoids, robotics, computer bio-modeling) and system of testing before starting the research (312).

Recent decades have shown a tremendous development in science and technology, which have also made it possible to move to more human-centered science. Despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was possible to develop reliable vaccines for the market within 1 year, with fewer animal studies, increased use of alternatives, and expedited movement to clinical trials (272, 313). It should also be considered that legislative requirements for animal studies lack a solid, evidence-based foundation (314). In addition, there is a special need to entrench advanced alternatives across tertiary curricula and training for medical students, as well as students of relevant life and health sciences. Results from a systematic review on the educational efficacy of humane teaching methods indicate that learning outcomes are superior (30%), equivalent (60%), or inferior (10%) to those produced by traditional animal use (315). The review concludes that widespread implementation of humane teaching methods would preserve learning outcomes and may provide additional benefits for students and educators, tertiary institutions, and entities, with a particular focus on the wellbeing of animals (315). Animal-free methods in educational training and research, as part of de-medicalized future approaches to health, are on the pulse of time, indeed. With this, humane teaching methods have already been implemented within life and health sciences education and in many countries. Nowadays, ethically motivated students are able to pursue their studies in tertiary education and training without harming animals (316–318).

Over the past two decades, funding agencies have launched opportunities and specific calls for innovative projects across various disciplines to develop alternative methods replacing animal experiments (319–322). These initiatives and programs, often backed not only by national funding agencies and/or corresponding federal ministries but also increasingly on a European and world-wide level, aim to support the development of effective, efficient, human-relevant and human-centric technologies and tools in sustainable biomedical research (319–321). The recent launch of the new Ombion Center for animal-free biomedical innovations is a demonstration of major investments by the Dutch government to build an infrastructure offering research, education, training, advice and support to enhance the acceptance and use of animal-free biomedical innovations (323).

In this regard, innovative and award-winning databases provide transparent information, helping to avoid or at least reduce the use of animals in experiments characterized by repeated trials and multiple testing (324, 325). A recent survey commissioned by the Eurogroup for Animals, polled approximately 11,000 EU citizens from eight member states on the abolition of animal testing in research, testing, and education, with 77% of EU citizens in favor of phasing out animal testing (326). This outcome is in line with a registered 2023 European Citizens' Initiative advocating for a Europe without animal testing, supported by more than 1.2 million valid signatures from citizens of all 27 EU member states (327, 328), providing a strong indication of the shift away from animal testing.

4.5 The COVID-19 pandemic

Opportunities to follow healthy lifestyle behavior may be influenced by limiting factors and acute events that are beyond an individual's intention and control. During the past 5 years, COVID-19, as a magnifying glass of public health problems, posed an unprecedented worldwide challenge and evolved into a sudden public health emergency overnight, which is unparalleled in contemporary history (329, 330). To control the spread of the pandemic, social contact restrictions (e.g., encouraging people to stay at home, avoid non-essential travel, and maintain social distance) and lockdowns with (self-)quarantine (e.g., closure of public gardens, educational and recreational services and utilities) have been frequently implemented (331, 332). Regardless of the health-related problems associated with direct infection with SARS-CoV-2, data show that the pandemic has had unfavorable impacts on lifestyle behaviors (including dietary and activity patterns) and health status (including mental health) of various populations worldwide (333–335), which have gradually become more common than the outbreak itself. Additionally, education and community life have also been markedly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions (336, 337), which may potentially result in further detrimental health effects from a long-term viewpoint (although this is currently hidden). Evidence indicates that healthy lifestyle behaviors, particularly regular engagement in PA, sports, and exercise alongside a healthy (particularly, WFPP, preferably vegetarian/vegan) diet can strengthen the immune system and reduce the likelihood of COVID-19 infection (338–344). Additionally, an active lifestyle is considered an effective strategy to reduce the psychological distress associated with the pandemic and lockdowns (345–347). During such an unprecedented pandemic, where medical and/or pharmacological treatments are not yet available to effectively manage its spread, a collaborative effort between health organizations and governmental decision-makers is necessary to promote evidence-based, de-medicalized approaches, such as “Healthy Eating & Active Living,” to prioritize providing practical incentives for people to consume healthier food options and engage in desirable PA, sports, and exercise opportunities (348–351).

Currently, although it appears that the world is in the final stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, there exists no guarantee that hidden health-related concerns (especially those associated with psychosocial health) will not potentially appear or develop in the form of post-pandemic consequences, or that the world will not experience a similar health tragedy in the future. While current global policies face challenges in effectively proposing and addressing Earth's overpopulation as a general approach to mitigate most global pandemics, there appears to be a further emphasis on the fundamental adoption of healthy lifestyle behaviors as a key factor in modern and sustainable health and care practices for better public health outcomes to address existing public health concerns. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that the health of the individual is not equal to the health of the community. Therefore, at the very least, benefits from behavioral change occur across societal levels. From the perspective of the unenthusiastic population health developments worldwide, as well as the COVID-19 crisis recently passed, the public health community urgently needs advice-focused, hands-on actions along with the drivers of those generating increasing social, health, and care inequalities. It requires the willingness to act from professionals of all health-related areas and spheres of influence to tackle inequalities and strive for fairer treatment in the post-pandemic world (180, 191).

Due to the positive health effects in the promotion and maintenance of health over the life course, the following observations shall be considered for the protection against moderate-to-severe COVID-19 infections during situations of severe health conditions (although they were not entirely present in the public mass media as general recommendation to aid in one's state of health or even to support vaccine efficacy): the risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes and the associated death was lower (i) in active people meeting the PA, sports, and exercise guidelines during the COVID-19 situation compared to inactive people (338, 352–362), (ii) in people following dietary patterns characterized by high-quality choices, especially through healthy plant foods as “best buys” (339) compared to those did not prioritize their diet quality, and (iii) in people following vegetarian and vegan diets, which were associated with lower risk and severity of COVID-19 (reduction of up to 73%) compared to those following omnivorous diets (339, 340, 359–367). To reduce the likelihood of future epidemics, positive lifestyle changes (i.e., toward healthy eating habits) must be reflected since evidence indicates that slaughterhouse cooling chambers provide an optimum environment to preserve highly infectious viruses, like SARS-CoV-2, which further raises the need to talk about meat (368, 369). When a high-quality diet (indicated by a high percentage of plant foods or entirely WFPP diets at best) is supported by regular PA, sports, and exercise (daily outdoors/in nature at best), the unique synergistic effects improve the cardiovascular, metabolic, and immune systems, which ultimately benefits immune-surveillance and has the potential to counter similar virus infections and symptoms at three preventative levels: (1) strengthening immune system in combating infections; (2) increasing vaccine-efficacy via responses from other types of infections (e.g., influenza); (3) improving physical fitness and quality of life. Thus, PA, sports, and exercise combined with a healthy diet serves as an effective and promising dual approach to protect the human body from similar viral infections and symptoms (338–365). Since current policies have insufficiently addressed people's willingness to change, it is time for public-health communities, decision-makers, and health experts to encourage people and patients on “Healthy Eating & Active Living” through professional guidance (370, 371). From this perspective, it is any physician's responsibility to prioritize individual, public, and global health issues (191, 246), as basal and permanent moral drivers in medical and health-related professions, not only limited to times of severe crisis.

4.6 Closing remarks

According to the ACLM (60), there are several key behaviors, including core competencies with the minimum of the dual approach to sustainable health:

• Eating healthy food before taking medication (i.e., Food over Medicine), and continuously linked to

• Moderate-to-high levels of day-to-day PA, sports, and exercise (i.e., Exercise over Medicine).

There is no evidence-supported doubt that diet is a major determinant of health and wellbeing (for good) or disease (for worse) (27, 372, 373). Although analyses and recommendations of renowned studies like The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (270), the North Karelia Project (374) and The China Study (375, 376) vary, the general conclusions of these and many other conclusive publications usually state that healthy dietary patterns are mainly plant-predominant. Regarding Food over Medicine, the term WFPP diet has been coined by pioneers in the field of healthy eating (95, 377–379), as plant foods are believed to be even more effective than medicine (103). Exercise over Medicine, however, shows that healthy diet also has limitations, as other aspects of life and behavior fulfill the holistic concept (172, 183, 380, 381). Physical education as a compulsory school subject, therefore, plays a greater role in school health promotion than any other school subject such as science, history, or math. From a developmental perspective, PA requires children to have competence in motor skills to be able to move effectively and safely (382), and therefore, it requires fitness development (266, 267). Indeed, the integration of school subjects as a cohesive body of knowledge emphasizes the significance of their interactions, reflecting the potential to promote healthy behavior (383, 384).

Data from epidemiological evidence, such as the EPIC-Oxford Study or the Adventist cohorts, show quite broadly how a healthy lifestyle, including PA and exercise, along with plant-predominant (including vegan) diets, can contribute to long-term sustainable health (100, 385, 386). That is to say that these populations have provided a basic example of a healthy aging lifestyle, which has been shown to expand the lifespan from 10–17 years (91, 387, 388). Nearly 700 million years lived with disability were caused by NCDs in 2013, which constitute 9 out of the 10 leading causes of years lived with disability (389). NCD-caused years lived with disability contribute to most of the disease burden in many countries (389–391) and insurance groups are advocating for healthier behaviors, especially vegan nutrition, due to the exceptional characteristics (392–398). Many countries are now spending 30%−86% of their health care budgets on the medical management and symptomatic relief of NCDs and other chronic conditions (18, 20, 254, 399). Times of increased stress levels come and go but remain prevalent for specific populations, as not all diseases are preventable (e.g., due to genetics or that many people currently live with NCDs/chronic conditions), and therefore stress management and relief practices (e.g., Red Noses Clowndoctors, Sensory Room Therapy, yoga) hold precious value (400–402). These holistic practices are closely tied to our interpersonal relationships, which profoundly contributes to mental health (264). Happiness, after all, is the highest goal for many people in life (403), with much to learn from the circumstances in Bhutan, the one and only country with a federal ministry on happiness (404). Without health, considered the greatest wealth, the potential for happiness experienced over a lifetime is restricted (405). Therefore, it is especially important to consider the scale of misery for individuals as well as nations (403). In the best-case scenario for individuals, starting from natural health at birth to the full extent of leading a complete, healthy lifespan, the end of the aging process almost guarantees discomfort and/or some degree of suffering (388, 390, 406), while the choices to behave accordingly to avoid additional problems remain. The development and implementation of comprehensive public metrics to evaluate healthy lifestyle behaviors, along with offering financial incentives, compensation, or bonuses from statutory health insurance funds to families, educational entities at all levels, employees, and businesses that adopt health-promoting behaviors, could be effective toward fostering a culture of health and wellbeing within society and across nations (8, 10, 146, 230, 231).

Considering the “prevention first” appeal (that has been acknowledged across many global health policies but has deficient implementation) and given the importance of informed lifestyle choices as a practical step (114, 172), health experts, policymakers, journalists, and patients should be conscious of corporate-sponsored material regarding the nature or prevalence of the disease. Instead, they should rely on publicly funded sources that provide information on the de-medicalized treatment of common health problems as a primary preventive course of action. Likewise, rather than relying solely on prescribed medication, it is essential to consider the power of lifestyle medicine and health behavior, prioritizing a person-centered approach to health over a disease-centered one (15, 167). This involves making healthy lifestyle choices as the first line of intervention, placing them above the immediate prescription of medications to address unhealthy behaviors. Collectively, it is also essential for politicians, physicians, and the public to address the disparities and conflicts between public health and private health, including issues like the right to health, a patient's bill of rights, and patient autonomy. Rather than debating slogans, it is crucial to identify tailored solutions to the pressing health issues and challenges (407).

In the context of holistic support of personal health (particularly the de-medicalized evidence-based concept of lifestyle medicine) and based on consensus that food and physical exercise are considered medicines, the basic and simultaneously sound dual approach that forms the foundation to sustainable and lifelong health and wellbeing is “Healthy Eating & Active Living.” Based on the interwoven, related, and integrated nature from both the key pillars of health, (1) healthy–at best WFPP, preferably vegetarian/vegan–diets permanently linked to (2) regular–at best daily and outdoors/in nature–PA, sports, and exercise (13–15, 155–159, 161, 162, 165–172) is the minimum recommendation to start tapping the full potential of the power of lifestyle to improve one's health on an individual level. “Healthy Eating & Active Living” must come first in school education and be seamlessly linked with college and university education to promote the health and wellbeing of nations; person- (or patient-) centered approaches trumps disease- (medication-) centered approaches.

5 Conclusions

Despite increased healthcare budgets and improved quality of scientific data resulting in the development of evidence-based guidelines and recommendations aimed at promoting better individual health outcomes, the prevalence of unhealthy lifestyles, chronic conditions, and environmental challenges continues to accelerate. This is particularly evident in industrial nations and Western societies, but it is also becoming more prevalent and alarming in developing countries. These trends suggest that global health efforts may not be as effective as intended in promoting better individual health outcomes to improve public health. The overemphasis on medicalization and the limitations of current treatment methods in modern, high-tech medicine in tackling NCDs raise serious concerns and pose major challenges in achieving sustainable healthcare in an increasingly digitalized world. Additionally, various perspectives on scientific conclusions in the commercialized areas and fields of the global health sector can further complicate the understanding and dissemination of appropriate health information. These perspectives may be influenced by interests that do not always prioritize people's health and can damage the credibility of experts, reduce patient confidence, and create significant obstacles to public health promotion efforts. As a result, it is important to recognize and address these challenges to ensure that accurate and reliable health information is accessible to all.

The present consensus paper summarizes the findings and conclusions of three multidisciplinary meetings held in Innsbruck, Austria from 2020–2022, which collectively hosted 284 internationally recognized experts from 76 universities, stakeholders, and organizations from five continents. The aim of these research and knowledge exchange events was to address today's unenthusiastic and challenging global health dilemma by sharing practical and purposeful strategies to develop healthy lifestyle behaviors and habits, with a special focus on the evidence-base of “Healthy Eating & Active Living,” at best WFPP, preferably vegetarian/vegan diets permanently linked to PA, sports, and exercise at best daily and outdoors/in nature, as the minimum recommendation for initiating advantageous personal lifestyle changes for health. The goal was to motivate and empower individuals, general populations, as well as health, education, and policymaking experts alike to tap a huge intrapersonal potential often neglected or ignored. The experts identified gaps in health-related approaches, addressed how to tackle and bridge these, and debated research priorities and necessary policies for future efforts. The consortium of authors made and approved a significant number of consensus statements (N = 101) spanning across six specific themes based on sound and robust scientific evidence.

In conclusion, to address the current global health dilemma of today's high-tech medicine, multiple strategies are necessary, including establishing innovative curricula at all educational levels for children/adolescents, future teachers, pedagogics, and healthcare professionals. This should be accompanied by increased stakeholder participation from policymakers, health authorities, and public bodies, tackling organizational challenges related to multidisciplinary collaborations, addressing infrastructure requirements, revising disease classification systems, updating testing models, establishing regulatory frameworks and reimbursement models, and addressing potential ethical, legal, and social concerns. Moreover, it is crucial to evaluate the monetary and health-related effectiveness of specific health programs, interventions, and measures in terms of their impact on public health outcomes and thus budgets scaling vs. factual health of the public in being able to rate their return on investment, considering the different settings of nations' health care systems.

The presented consensus statements, though perhaps not immediately implementable worldwide, can serve as a crucial step toward establishing a roadmap for best practices in health science. To facilitate practical application, certain initial entry points can help guide implementation. Promoting “Healthy Eating & Active Living” (through well-planned wholefood, plant-predominant diets and regular PA) provides a foundational approach to prevent NCDs and improve overall health and well-being. Early interventions targeting children and adolescents, alongside personalized health behavior programs for adults, can foster sustainable lifestyle habits. In parallel, enhancing health education and literacy across all educational levels equips individuals with the knowledge, skills, and motivation to adopt and maintain healthier behaviors throughout life. Together, these strategies offer a pragmatic starting framework for translating the broader 101 consensus statements into actionable measures and to ensure optimal vertical permeability at all relevant levels and settings. This approach aims to address today's public health challenges, particularly in the increasing prevalence of NCDs and their underlying mechanisms, that are often neglected and/or forgotten, yet often need to be addressed despite growing advance in health science and increasing healthcare budgets. By providing practical strategies and highlighting research priorities and policies, the present consensus report and its detailed statements can assist in developing up-to-date and effective approaches that emphasize de-medicalized, holistic, and integrated health perspectives. They hold the potential to bridge existing gaps and limitations in health-related approaches and ensure that future efforts are aligned with the latest scientific findings.

The present consensus statements can contribute to the development of effective approaches, aiming for the overall improvement of individual and public health. This is especially relevant for policy and decision-makers, as well as various stakeholders, including NGOs, globally acting organizations, research funding agencies, health experts, scientists, healthcare and educational professionals, educational entities and institutions, and health-related industries.

References

• 1.

  WeatherallDGreenwoodBCheeHLWasiP. Science and technology for disease control: past, present, and future. In:JamisonDTBremanJGMeashamARAlleyneGClaesonMEvansDBetal., editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (2006). Chapter 5. p. 119–37. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11740/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  FortunatoSBergstromCTBörnerKEvansJAHelbingDMilojevićSet al. Science of science. Science. (2018) 359:eaao0185. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0185

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  SalasECannon-BowersJA. The science of training: a decade of progress. Annu Rev Psychol. (2001) 52:471–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  HoulihanCFWhitworthJA. Outbreak science: recent progress in the detection and response to outbreaks of infectious diseases. Clin Med. (2019) 19:140–4. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-140

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable Diseases. WHO Fact Sheets (2022). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  MurrayCJLopezADeditors. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health (2013).

  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  NCD Countdown 2030 collaborators. NCD Countdown 2030: worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress toward Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4. Lancet. (2018) 392:1072–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31992-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  HambletonIRCaixetaRJeyaseelanSMLucianiSHennisAJM. The rising burden of non-communicable diseases in the Americas and the impact of population aging: a secondary analysis of available data. Lancet Reg Health Am. (2023) 21:100483 doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100483

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. (2018) 392:1736–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  WirnitzerKDrenowatzCKirschnerWTanousDRosemannT. International Research & Knowledge Exchange for Addressing Today's Global Health Paradox. Lausanne: Front Public Health (2020).

  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  WirnitzerKGattererLThalerJ. The Future in (y)our Hands – Be the Game Changers! Innsbruck, Austria (2022). Available online at: https://www.i-med.ac.at/event/gamechanger.html (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  GattrellWTLogulloPvan ZuurenEJPriceAHughesELBlazeyPet al. ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): a reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med. (2024) 21:e1004326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  TusoP. Physician update: total health. Perm J. (2014) 18:58–63. doi: 10.7812/TPP/13-120

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  TusoPJIsmailMHHaBPBartolottoC. Nutritional update for physicians: plant-based diets. Perm J. (2013) 17:61–6. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-085

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  TusoP. Prediabetes and lifestyle modification: time to prevent a preventable disease. Perm J. (2014) 18:88–93. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  McKeownRE. The epidemiologic transition: changing patterns of mortality and population dynamics. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2009) 3:19S−26S. doi: 10.1177/1559827609335350

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  MercerAJ. Updating the epidemiological transition model. Epidemiol Infect. (2018) 146:680–7. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818000572

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  SchäferhoffMMartinezSOgbuojiOSabinMLYameyG. Trends in global health financing. BMJ. (2019) 365:l2185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2185

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  SchneiderMTChangAYChapinAChenCSCrosbySWHarleACet al. Health expenditures by services and providers for 195 countries, 2000-2017. BMJ Glob Health. (2021) 6:e005799. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005799

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995-2050. Lancet. (2019) 393:2233–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  NormanG. Research in medical education: three decades of progress. BMJ. (2002) 324:1560–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1560

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  MendlovicJMimouniFBAradIHeimanE. Trends in health quality–related publications over the past three decades: systematic review. Interact J Med Res. (2022) 11:e31055. doi: 10.2196/31055

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  ZhouXLiZZhengTYanYLiPOdeyEAet al. Review of global sanitation development. Environ Int. (2018) 120:246–61. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.047

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  LawnJEBlencoweHOzaSYouDLeeACWaiswaPet al. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival [published correction appears in Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):132]. Lancet. (2014) 384:189–205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  Institute of Medicine (US). Committee to study priorities for vaccine development. Stratton KR, Durch JS, Lawrence RS, editors. Vaccines for the 21st Century: A Tool for Decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US) (2000). 2, Progress in Vaccine Development. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233325/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  LoudJTMurphyJ. Cancer screening and early detection in the 21st century. Semin Oncol Nurs. (2017) 33:121–8. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.02.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  BravemanPGottliebL. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. (2014) 129(Suppl 2):19–31. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S206

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  KrukMEGageADArsenaultCJordanKLeslieHHRoder-DeWanSet al. High-quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. (2018) 6:e1196–252. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  GinsburgGSPhillipsKA. Precision medicine: from science to value. Health Aff. (2018) 37:694–701. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1624

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  JohnsonKBWeiWQWeeraratneDFrisseMEMisulisKRheeKet al. Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clin Transl Sci. (2021) 14:86–93. doi: 10.1111/cts.12884

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  BrittainHKScottRThomasE. The rise of the genome and personalised medicine. Clin Med. (2017) 17:545–51. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-6-545

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  MathurSSuttonJ. Personalized medicine could transform healthcare. Biomed Rep. (2017) 7:3–5. doi: 10.3892/br.2017.922

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33.

  Brunner-La RoccaHPFleischhackerLGolubnitschajaOHeemskerkFHelmsTHoedemakersTet al. Challenges in personalised management of chronic diseases-heart failure as prominent example to advance the care process. EPMA J. (2016) 7:2. doi: 10.1186/s13167-016-0051-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34.

  HadianMMozafariMRMazaheriEJabbariA. Challenges of the health system in preventing non-communicable diseases; systematized review. Int J Prev Med. (2021) 12:71. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_487_20

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35.

  SchwartzLNShafferJDBukhmanG. The origins of the 4 × 4 framework for noncommunicable disease at the World Health Organization. SSM Popul Health. (2021) 13:100731. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100731

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36.

  PerakAMBaker-SmithCHaymanLLKhouryMPetersonALWareALet al. Toward a roadmap for best practices in pediatric preventive cardiology: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. (2023) 16:e000120. doi: 10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000120

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37.

  MasicIMiokovicMMuhamedagicB. Evidence based medicine - new approaches and challenges. Acta Inform Med. (2008) 16:219–25. doi: 10.5455/aim.2008.16.219-225

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38.

  CroftPAltmanDGDeeksJJDunnKMHayADHemingwayHet al. The science of clinical practice: disease diagnosis or patient prognosis? Evidence about “what is likely to happen” should shape clinical practice. BMC Med. (2015) 13:20. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0265-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39.

  BairdJJacobCBarkerMFallCHHansonMHarveyNCet al. Developmental origins of health and disease: a lifecourse approach to the prevention of non-communicable diseases. Healthcare. (2017) 5:14. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5010014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40.

  BudreviciuteADamiatiSSabirDKOnderKSchuller-GoetzburgPPlakysGet al. Management and prevention strategies for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. Front Public Health. (2020) 8:574111. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.574111

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41.

  LiedloffJ. The Continuum Concept: In Search Of Happiness Lost. New York City, NY: Addison-Wesley. (1975).

  • Google Scholar

• 42.

  BarabásiALGulbahceNLoscalzoJ. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. (2011) 12:56–68. doi: 10.1038/nrg2918

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43.

  SchubertC. Bewusstwerdung als Heilung – die Wirkung künstlerischen Tuns auf das Immunsystem. In: Von Spreti F, Martius P, Steger F (Hrsg.). KunstTherapie. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer (2017). p. 43–128.

  • Google Scholar

• 44.

  KratkyK.W. Human typology in integrative medicine. In:HashiH, editors. Philosophy of Nature in Cross-Cultural Dimensions. The Result of the International Symposium at the University of Vienna. Dr. Kovač, Hamburg (2017). p. 197–217.

  • Google Scholar

• 45.

  GoInvo. Determinants of Health, 2017-2018. Available online at: https://www.goinvo.com/vision/determinants-of-health/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 46.

  SchroederSA. Shattuck Lecture. We can do better–improving the health of the American people. N Engl J Med. (2007) 357:1221–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa073350

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47.

  GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. (2019) 393:1958–72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48.

  World Economic Forum Harvard Harvard School of Public Health. The Global Economic Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases. Available online at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-economic-burden-non-communicable-diseases/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 49.

  AgirbasliMTanrikuluAMBerensonGS. Metabolic syndrome: bridging the gap from childhood to adulthood. Cardiovasc Ther. (2016) 34:30–6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12165

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50.

  DelaneyLSmithJP. Childhood health: trends and consequences over the life course. Future Child. (2012) 22:43–63. doi: 10.1353/foc.2012.0003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51.

  GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. (2016) 388:1659–724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52.

  World Health Organization Europe. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study. Available online at: https://www.who.int/europe/initiatives/health-behaviour-in-school-aged-children-(hbsc)-study (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 53.

  CrimminsEM. Lifespan and Healthspan: Past, Present, and Promise. Gerontologist. (2015) 55:901–11. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv130

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54.

  ButlerWF. The Art of Living Long. A New and Improved English version of the Treatise by the celebrated Venetian Centenarian Luigi Cornaro. 1917, Milwakee. Digitalized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from Microsoft Corporation. Available online at: https://archive.org/details/artoflivinglong00corniala; https://archive.org/download/artoflivinglong00corniala/artoflivinglong00corniala_jp2.zip (Accessed May 15, 2025). Digital Reproduction by the California Digital Library. Available online at: https://archive.org/details/cdl (Accessed May 5, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 55.

  HowellTH. The art of living long by Luigi Cornaro. Age Ageing. (1987) 16:194–5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/16.3.194

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56.

  HerskindAMMcGueMHolmNVSørensenTIHarvaldBVaupelJW. The heritability of human longevity: a population-based study of 2,872 Danish twin pairs born 1870-1900. Hum Genet. (1996) 96:319–23. doi: 10.1007/BF02185763

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57.

  SkyttheAPedersenNLKaprioJStaziMAHjelmborgJVIachineIet al. Longevity studies in GenomEUtwin. Twin Res. (2003) 6:448–54. doi: 10.1375/twin.6.5.448

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58.

  GovindarajuDAtzmonGBarzilaiN. Genetics, lifestyle and longevity: lessons from centenarians. Appl Transl Genom. (2015) 4:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2015.01.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59.

  GuthrieGE. What is lifestyle medicine?Am J Lifestyle Med. (2018) 12:363–4. doi: 10.1177/1559827618759992

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60.

  American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM). Available online at: https://www.lifestylemedicine.org/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

• 61.

  TrilkJLElkhiderIAAsifIBuchananAEmersonJKennedyABet al. Design and implementation of a lifestyle medicine curriculum in undergraduate medical education. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2019) 13:574–85. doi: 10.1177/1559827619836676

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62.

  EisenbergDMDavisRBEttnerSLAppelSWilkeySVan RompayMet al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. (1998) 280:1569–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.18.1569

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63.

  National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What's In a Name? Available online at: https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/complementary-alternative-or-integrative-health-whats-in-a-name (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 64.

  World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014-2023. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506090 (Accessed April 18, 2019).

  • Google Scholar

• 65.

  European Parliament. Benefits and Results of Complementary and Alternative Medicine for the European Union Citizens. Brussels, Belgium: European Parliament. Available online at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/benefits-and-results-of-complementary-in/product-details/20210927WKS03802 (Accessed September 27, 2021).

  • Google Scholar

• 66.

  WHO. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014-2023. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/92455 (Accessed September 28, 2021).

  • Google Scholar

• 67.

  NATO Science and Technology Organization. March 2017. Integrative Medicine Interventions for Military Personnel. doi: 10.14339/STO-TR-HFM-195

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68.

  Word Health Organization (WHO) World Health Assembly (WHA). The Sixty-ninth World Health Assembly's resolution WHA69.24. Strengthening integrated, people-centred health services (2016). Available online at: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_R24-en.pdf (Accessed September 28, 2021).

  • Google Scholar

• 69.

  National Institutes of Health. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Available online at: https://www.nccih.nih.gov/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 70.

  European Parliament. Proceedings of the workshop ‘Alternative Medicines' (2011). Available online at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/workshop/join/2011/475079/IPOL-ENVI_AT(2011)475079_EN.pdf (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 71.

  DownerSBerkowitzSAHarlanTSOlstadDLMozaffarianD. Food is medicine: actions to integrate food and nutrition into healthcare. BMJ. (2020) 369:m2482. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2482

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72.

  MozaffarianDMandeJMichaR. Food is medicine-the promise and challenges of integrating food and nutrition into health care. JAMA Intern Med. (2019) 179:793–5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0184

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73.

  LedererA-KHuberR. The relation of diet and health: you are what you eat. Int J Env Res Pub Health. (2022) 19:7774. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137774

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74.

  KoederCPerez-CuetoFJA. Vegan nutrition: a preliminary guide for health professionals. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2024) 64:670–707. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2107997

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75.

  ChenAMHDraimeJABermanSGardnerJKraussZMartinezJ. Food as medicine? Exploring the impact of providing healthy foods on adherence and clinical and economic outcomes. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. (2022) 5:100129. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100129

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76.

  LucanSC. When food isn't medicine - A challenge for physicians and health systems. Prev Med Rep. (2018) 10:62–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.02.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77.

  MonterrosaECFrongilloEADrewnowskiAde PeeSVandevijvereS. Sociocultural influences on food choices and implications for sustainable healthy diets. Food Nutr Bull. (2020) 41(2_suppl):59S−73S. doi: 10.1177/0379572120975874

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78.

  ChenPJAntonelliM. Conceptual models of food choice: influential factors related to foods, individual differences, and society. Foods. (2020) 9:1898. doi: 10.3390/foods9121898

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79.

  DjekicIBartkieneESzucsVTarceaMKlarinICernelić-BizjakMet al. Cultural dimensions associated with food choice: a survey based multi-country study. Int J Gastron Food Sci. (2021) 26:100414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100414

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80.

  PopkinBM. Global nutrition dynamics: the world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 99:1507–16. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.2.289

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81.

  CenaHCalderPC. Defining a healthy diet: evidence for the role of contemporary dietary patterns in health and disease. Nutrients. (2020) 12:334. doi: 10.3390/nu12020334

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82.

  World Health Organization. Healthy Diet Fact Sheet (2018). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 83.

  HarvardT.H. Chan School of Public Health. The Healthy Eating Plate. Available online at: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-eating-plate/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 84.

  Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. Good Nutrition (2023). Available online at: https://www.pcrm.org/good-nutrition (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 85.

  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthy Eating for a Healthy Weight (2021). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/healthy_eating/index.html (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 86.

  U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025. 9th ed (2020). Available online at: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/Dietary_Guidelines_for_Americans-2020-2025.pdf (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 87.

  HerforthAArimondMÁlvarez-SánchezCCoatesJChristiansonKMuehlhoffE. A global review of food-based dietary guidelines [published correction appears in Adv Nutr. 2019 Jul 1;10:730]. Adv Nutr. (2019) 10:590–605. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy130

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88.

  NeuhouserML. The importance of healthy dietary patterns in chronic disease prevention. Nutr Res. (2019) 70:3–6. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2018.06.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89.

  World Health Organization (WHO). Healthy Diet. Available online at: https://www.who.int/initiatives/behealthy/healthy-diet (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 90.

  WilsonTBendichA. Nutrition guidelines for improved clinical care. Med Clin North Am. (2022) 106:819–36. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2022.04.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91.

  CámaraMGinerRMGonzález-FandosELópez-GarcíaEMañesJPortilloMPet al. Food-based dietary guidelines around the world: a comparative analysis to update AESAN scientific committee dietary recommendations. Nutrients. (2021) 13:3131. doi: 10.3390/nu13093131

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92.

  ThompsonASTresserra-RimbauAKaravasiloglouNJenningsACantwellMHillCet al. Association of healthful plant-based diet adherence with risk of mortality and major chronic diseases among adults in the UK. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e234714. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4714

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93.

  MelinaVCraigWLevinS. Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: vegetarian diets. J Acad Nutr Diet. (2016) 116:1970–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94.

  Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM). Frequently Asked Questions About Nutrition. 1. Do You Recommend a Vegetarian or a Vegan Diet? Available online at: http://www.pcrm.org/health/diets/vegdiets/frequently (Accessed January 1, 2018).

  • Google Scholar

• 95.

  DeanE. Academy of plant-based physical therapy: overdue to address a nutrition crisis with a transformative population approach. J Phys Ther Sci. (2023) 35:645–58. doi: 10.1589/jpts.35.645

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96.

  GregerM. Plant-based nutrition to slow the aging process. ijdrp. (2023) 6:4. doi: 10.22230/ijdrp.2024v6n1a423

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97.

  GoldfarbGSelaY. The ideal diet for humans to sustainably feed the growing population – review, meta-analyses, and policies for change. F1000Res. (2023) 10:1135. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.73470.2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98.

  LeitzmannC. Vegetarian nutrition: past, present, future. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 100(Suppl 1):496S−502S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071365

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99.

  Román-ViñasBSerra-MajemLRibas-BarbaLNgoJGarcía-AlvarezAWijnhovenTMet al. Overview of methods used to evaluate the adequacy of nutrient intakes for individuals and populations. Br J Nutr. (2009) 101(Suppl 2):S6–11. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509990535

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100.

  OrlichMJFraserGE. Vegetarian diets in the Adventist Health Study 2: a review of initial published findings. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 100(Suppl 1):353S−8S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071233

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101.

  RudloffSBührerCJochumFKauthTKerstingMKörnerAet al. Vegetarian diets in childhood and adolescence. Position paper of the nutrition committee, German Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ). Mol Cell Pediatr. (2019) 6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40348-019-0091-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102.

  MenzelJJabakhanjiABiemannRMaiKAbrahamKWeikertC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations of vegan and vegetarian diets with inflammatory biomarkers. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:21736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78426-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103.

  DybvikJSSvendsenMAuneD. Vegetarian and vegan diets and the risk of cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Nutr. (2023) 62:51–69. doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-02942-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104.

  ChareonrungrueangchaiKWongkawinwootKAnothaisintaweeTReutrakulS. Dietary factors and risks of cardiovascular diseases: an umbrella review. Nutrients. (2020) 12:1088. doi: 10.3390/nu12041088

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105.

  The World Health Organization. WHO Reveals Leading Causes of Death and Disability Worldwide: 2000-2019 (2020). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of-death-and-disability-worldwide-2000-2019 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 106.

  Esselstyn CBJrGendyGDoyleJDoyleJGolubicMRoizenMF. A way to reverse CAD?J Fam Pract. (2014) 63:356–364b.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 107.

  QuekJLimGLimWHNgCHSoWZTohJet al. The association of plant-based diet with cardiovascular disease and mortality: a meta-analysis and systematic review of prospect cohort studies. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8:756810. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.756810

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108.

  KimHCaulfieldLEGarcia-LarsenVSteffenLMCoreshJRebholzCM. Plant-based diets are associated with a lower risk of incident cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular disease mortality, and all-cause mortality in a general population of middle-aged adults. J Am Heart Assoc. (2019) 8:e012865. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012865

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109.

  RaoRHawkinsMUlrichTGatlinGMabryGMishraC. The evolving role of public health in medical education. Front Public Health. (2020) 8:251. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00251

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110.

  LiuYZhangYLiuZWangJ. Gaps in studies of global health education: an empirical literature review. Glob Health Action. (2015) 8:25709. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.25709

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111.

  StorzMA. Is there a lack of support for whole-food, plant-based diets in the medical community?Perm J. (2018) 23:18–068. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-068

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112.

  DevriesSAgatstonAAggarwalMAspryKEEsselstynCBKris-EthertonPet al. A deficiency of nutrition education and practice in cardiology. Am J Med. (2017) 130:1298–305. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.04.043

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113.

  CrowleyJBallLHiddinkGJ. Nutrition in medical education: a systematic review. Lancet Planet Health. (2019) 3:e379–e89. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30171-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114.

  European Commission (EC). State of Health in the EU: Shift to Prevention and Primary Care is the Most Important Trend across Countries. Brussles: State of Health in the EU (2019) Press release: 28 November 2019. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_6336 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 115.

  RheinbergerCMHerrera-AraujoDHammittJK. The value of disease prevention vs treatment. J Health Econ. (2016) 50:247–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.08.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116.

  LyuHXuTBrotmanDMayer-BlackwellBCooperMDanielMet al. Overtreatment in the United States. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0181970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181970

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117.

  European Commission. Healthy Lifestyle for All. Available online at: https://sport.ec.europa.eu/initiatives/healthylifestyle4all (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 118.

  European Union Office of the European Olympic Committees. EU Commission Publishes Its 2023 Work Programme Including Actions on Piracy of Live Content and More. Available online at: https://www.euoffice.eurolympic.org/eu-commission-publishes-its-2023-work-programme-including-actions-piracy-live-content-and/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 119.

  CaraKCGoldmanDMKollmanBKAmatoSSTullMDKarlsenMC. Commonalities among dietary recommendations from 2010 to 2021 clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2023) 17:290–9. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.03.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120.

  American Medical Association (AMA). Healthy Food Options in Hospitals H-150.949. Available online at: https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/Healthy%20Food%20Options%20in%20Hospitals%20H-150.949?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-627.xml (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 121.

  VilletteCVasseurPLapidusNDebinMHanslikTBlanchonTet al. Vegetarian and vegan diets: beliefs and attitudes of general practitioners and pediatricians in France. Nutrients. (2022)14:3101. doi: 10.3390/nu14153101

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122.

  SavageGP. Vegetarianism: a nutritional ideology? Part 1: History, Ideology and nutritional aspects. NZ Sci Rev. (1996) 53:72–8. doi: 10.13140/2.1.3984.1921

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123.

  PopkinBMAdairLSNgSW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. (2012) 70:3–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124.

  AltKWAl-AhmadAWoelberJP. Nutrition and health in human evolution-past to present. Nutrients. (2022) 14:3594. doi: 10.3390/nu14173594

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125.

  MurrayCJAtkinsonCBhallaKBirbeckGBursteinRChouDet al. The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. (2013) 310:591–608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.13805

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126.

  JankoRKHaussmannIPatelA. The prevalence of infectious diseases among seventh-day adventists: a systematic review. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2025) 19:15598276251370238. doi: 10.1177/15598276251370238

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127.

  PhillipsRLemonFBeesonWKzumaJ. Coronary heart disease mortality among seventh-day adventists with differing dietary habits: a preliminary report. Am J Clin Nutr. (1978) 31:191–8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/31.10.S191

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128.

  SchwingshacklLBogensbergerBHoffmannG. Diet quality as assessed by the healthy eating index, alternate healthy eating index, dietary approaches to stop hypertension score, and health outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. (2018)118:74–100.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129.

  FraserGE. Vegetarian diets: what do we know about their effects on common chronic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. (2009) 89:1607S−16S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736K

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130.

  GregerMStoneG. How Not to Die. Discover the Foods Scientifically Proven to Prevent and Reverse Disease. New York City, NY: Flatiron Books (2015).

  • Google Scholar

• 131.

  SpringmannMMason-D'CrozDRobinsonSGarnettTGodfrayHCGollinDet al. Global and regional health effects of future food production under climate change: a modelling study. Lancet. (2016) 387:1937–46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01156-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132.

  SengulP. Comparison of vegan and non-vegan diets on memory and sleep quality. Clin Nutr Open Sci. (2022) 43:P78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.nutos.2022.05.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133.

  GalchenkoAGapparovaKSidorovaE. The influence of vegetarian and vegan diets on the state of bone mineral density in humans. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2023) 63:845–61. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1996330

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134.

  TermannsenADClemmensenKKBThomsenJMNørgaardODíazLJTorekovSSet al. Effects of vegan diets on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. (2022) 23:e13462. doi: 10.1111/obr.13462

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135.

  BuettnerDSkempS. Blue zones: lessons from the world's longest lived. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2016) 10:318–21. doi: 10.1177/1559827616637066

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136.

  KeyTJPapierKTongTYN. Plant-based diets and long-term health: findings from the EPIC-Oxford study. Proc Nutr Soc. (2022) 81:190–8. doi: 10.1017/S0029665121003748

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137.

  PoulainMHermAPesG. The blue zones: areas of exceptional longevity around the world. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. (2013) 11:87–108. Available online at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43050798 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 138.

  BuettnerD. Lessons From the Blue Zones: There is No Silver Bullet (or Magic Pill) for a Long, Healthy Life. here see Abstract last sentences - make the healthy choice the easy choice

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 139.

  WillettWRockströmJLokenBSpringmannMLangTVermeulenSet al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. (2019) 393:447–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140.

  European Commission. Food 2030 Research and Innovation – Pathways for action 2.0. Available online at: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-research-and-innovation-news/new-report-food-2030-research-and-innovation-pathways-action-20-2023-12-04_en (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 141.

  IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (2022). Available online at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_SPM.pdf (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 142.

  IPCC. Climate Change 2023 Synthesis Report (2023). Available online at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 143.

  ScarboroughPClarkMCobiacLPapierKKnuppelALynchJet al. Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts. Nat Food. (2023) 4:565–74. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00795-w

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144.

  OwenNSparlingPBHealyGNDunstanDWMatthewsCE. Sedentary behavior: emerging evidence for a new health risk. Mayo Clin Proc. (2010) 85:1138–41. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0444

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145.

  World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (2018). Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272722 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 146.

  VinaJSanchis-GomarFMartinez-BelloVGomez-CabreraMC. Exercise acts as a drug; the pharmacological benefits of exercise. Br J Pharmacol. (2012) 167:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01970.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147.

  WarburtonDERBredinSSD. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. (2017) 32:541–56. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000437

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148.

  ThompsonWRSallisRJoyEJaworskiCAStuhrRMTrilkJL. Exercise is medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2020) 14:511–23. doi: 10.1177/1559827620912192

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149.

  ChowLSGersztenRETaylorJMPedersenBKvan PraagHTrappeSet al. Exerkines in health, resilience and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2022) 18:273–89. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00641-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150.

  SwisherAK. Yes, “Exercise is Medicine”….but It Is So Much More!Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. (2010) 21:4. doi: 10.1097/01823246-201021040-00001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151.

  InoueKTsugawaYMayedaERRitzB. Association of daily step patterns with mortality in US adults. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e235174. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5174

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152.

  WarburtonDENicolCWBredinSS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. (2006) 174:801–9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153.

  Collado-MateoDLavín-PérezAMPeñacobaCDel CosoJLeyton-RománMLuque-CasadoAet al. Key factors associated with adherence to physical exercise in patients with chronic diseases and older adults: an umbrella review. Int J Env Res Pub Health. (2021) 18:2023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154.

  World Health Organization (WHO). Physical Activity. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 155.

  MitchellRPophamF. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet. (2008) 372:1655–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156.

  Della-MorteDPacificiF. Nature can still be the strongest help against aging and neurodegeneration: the sirtuins way. Neural Regen Res. (2023) 18:1271–2. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.360173

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157.

  Twohig-BennettCJonesA. The health benefits of the great outdoors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environ Res. (2018) 166:628–37. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158.

  WhiteMPAlcockIGrellierJWheelerBWHartigTWarberSLet al. Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:7730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159.

  FrancoLSShanahanDFFullerRA. A review of the benefits of nature experiences: more than meets the eye. Int J Env Res Pub Health. (2017) 14:864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080864

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160.

  CollingsC. On your mark, get set, go! It's time to elevate all six pillars of lifestyle medicine... starting with physical activity!Am J Lifestyle Med. (2020) 14:612–4. doi: 10.1177/1559827620948009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161.

  Euractiv Special Report. Physical Inactivity Costs Estimated at € 80 bn per Year (2015). Available online at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/sports/news/physical-inactivity-costs-estimated-at-80bn-per-year/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 162.

  KirkebyM. The Economic Cost of Physical Inactivity in Europe (ECIPE). An ISCA/Cebr report (2015). Available online at: https://inactivity-time-bomb.nowwemove.com/download-report/The%20Economic%20Costs%20of%20Physical%20Inactivity%20in%20Europe%20(June%202015).pdf (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 163.

  SagelvEHHopstockLAMorsethBHansenBHSteene-JohannessenJJohanssonJet al. Device-measured physical activity, sedentary time, and risk of all-cause mortality: an individual participant data analysis of four prospective cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. (2023) 57:1457–63. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106568

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164.

  GuiseJMChangCViswanathanMGlickSTreadwellJUmscheidCAet al. Systematic Reviews of Complex Multicomponent Health Care Interventions. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) (2014) Report No.: 14-EHC003-EF. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK194846/

  • Google Scholar

• 165.

  DunnCLHannanPJJefferyRWSherwoodNEPronkNPBoyleR. The comparative and cumulative effects of a dietary restriction and exercise on weight loss. Int J Obes. (2006) 30:112–21. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803046

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166.

  SénéchalMSlaghtJBhartiNBouchardDR. Independent and combined effect of diet and exercise in adults with prediabetes. Diab Metab Syndr Obes. (2014) 7:521–9. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S62367

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167.

  OECD. Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyles: Best Practices in Public Health. Paris, France: OECD Publishing (2022).

  • Google Scholar

• 168.

  KoehlerKDrenowatzC. Integrated role of nutrition and physical activity for lifelong health. Nutrients. (2019) 11:1437. doi: 10.3390/nu11071437

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169.

  TanousDRRuedlGKirschnerWDrenowatzCCraddockJRosemannTet al. School health programs of physical education and/or diet among pupils of primary and secondary school levels I and II linked to body mass index: a systematic review protocol within the project From Science 2 School. PLoS ONE. (2022) 17:e0275012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170.

  From Science 2 School:Sustainably Healthy – Active & Veggy. Available online at: https://www.science2.school/en/ (Accessed August 30, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 171.

  Sustainably healthy – From Science 2 Highschool & University. Available online at: https://uni.science2.school/en/ (Accessed August 30, 2025).

• 172.

  WirnitzerKDrenowatzC. An integrative approach in addressing today's global health crisis. Editorial, main: 14-22. In:WirnitzerKetal., editors. International Research & Knowledge Exchange for Addressing Today's Global Health Paradox. Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA. Front Pub Health (2020).

  • Google Scholar

• 173.

  KuruvillaSSadanaRMontesinosEVBeardJVasdekiJFAraujo de CarvalhoIet al. A life-course approach to health: synergy with sustainable development goals. Bull World Health Organ. (2018) 96:42–50. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.198358

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174.

  SeetharamanMKrishnanGSchneiderRH. The future of medicine: frontiers in integrative health and medicine. Medicina. (2021) 57:1303. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121303

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175.

  McKeeJ. Holistic health and the critique of Western medicine. Soc Sci Med. (1988) 26:775–84. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90171-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176.

  LoscalzoJBarabasiA-L. Systems biology and the future of medicine. Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. (2011) 3:619–27. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.144

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177.

  RippeJM. Lifestyle Medicine: The health promoting power of daily habits and practices. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2018) 12:499–512. doi: 10.1177/1559827618785554

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178.

  ShortSEMollbornS. Social determinants and health behaviors: conceptual frames and empirical advances. Curr Opin Psychol. (2015) 5:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.05.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179.

  Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on Assuring the Health of the Public in the 21st Century. The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US) (2002). A – Models of Health Determinants. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221240/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 180.

  DahlgrenGWhiteheadM. The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows. Public Health. (2021) 199:20–4. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181.

  RaihanNCogburnM. Stages of change theory. In:RaihanNCogburnM, editors StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing (2023). Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556005/ (Accessed September 26, 2025).

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 182.

  ProchaskaJOVelicerWF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. (1997) 12:38–48. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183.

  JaeschkeLSteinbrecherALuzakAPugginaAAleksovskaKBuckCet al. Socio-cultural determinants of physical activity across the life course: a ‘Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity' (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2017) 14:173. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0627-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184.

  BackettKCDavisonC. Lifecourse and lifestyle: the social and cultural location of health behaviours. Soc Sci Med. (1995) 40:629–38. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)80007-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185.

  OrtizCLópez-CuadradoTRodríguez-BlázquezCSimónLPerez-VicenteRMerloJet al. Physical and social environmental factors related to co-occurrence of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. Health Place. (2022) 75:102804. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102804

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186.

  MortonSPencheonDSquiresN. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and their implementation: a national global framework for health, development and equity needs a systems approach at every level. Br Med Bull. (2017) 124:81–90. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldx031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187.

  UN Women – Headquarters. SDG 4: Ensure Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Promote Lifelong Learning Opportunities For All. Available online at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/women-and-the-sdgs/sdg-4-quality-education (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 188.

  WheelerNWattsN. Climate change: from science to practice. Curr Environ Health Rep. (2018) 5:170–8. doi: 10.1007/s40572-018-0187-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189.

  MalhiYFranklinJSeddonNSolanMTurnerMGFieldCBet al. Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. (2020) 375:20190104. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0104

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190.

  RocqueRJBeaudoinCNdjaboueRCameronLPoirier-BergeronLPoulin-RheaultRAet al. Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. (2021) 11:e046333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191.

  GattererLKriwanFTanousDWirnitzerK. Human health in peril: the need to upgrade medical education in light of COVID-19. Front Med. (2022) 9:999671. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.999671

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192.

  SauerbornREbiK. Climate change and natural disasters: integrating science and practice to protect health. Glob Health Action. (2012) 5:1–7. doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.19295

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193.

  SchmidhuberJTubielloFN. Global food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2007) 104:19703–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701976104

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194.

  XieEde BarrosEFAbelsohnASteinATHainesA. Challenges and opportunities in planetary health for primary care providers. Lancet Planet Health. (2018) 2:e185–7. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30055-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195.

  AtwoliL. Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health: Wealthy nations must do much more, much faster. Rev Panam Salud Publica. (2021) 45:e122. doi: 10.14744/ejmi.2021.00011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196.

  MartenRYangchenSCampbell-LendrumDPratsEVNeiraMPGhaffarA. Climate change: an urgent priority for health policy and systems research. Health Policy Plan. (2021) 36:218–20. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa165

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197.

  WHO. Climate Change. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 198.

  UNICEF. The Climate Crisis is a Child Rights Crisis. Available online at: https://www.unicef.org/media/105376/file/UNICEF-climate-crisis-child-rights-crisis.pdf (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 199.

  HajarR. Animal testing and medicine. Heart Views. (2011) 12:42. doi: 10.4103/1995-705X.81548

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200.

  KilkennyCParsonsNKadyszewskiEFestingMFCuthillICFryDet al. Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS ONE. (2009) 4:e7824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007824

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201.

  PerelPRobertsISenaEWheblePBriscoeCSandercockPet al. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ. (2007) 334:197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39048.407928.BE

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202.

  BaileyJ. Nonhuman primates in medical research and drug development: a critical review. Biog Amines. (2015) 29:235–55. doi: 10.1163/156939105774647385

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203.

  BrackenMB. Why animal studies are often poor predictors of human reactions to exposure. J R Soc Med. (2009) 102:120–2. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.08k033

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204.

  PoundPEbrahimSSandercockPBrackenMBRobertsIReviewing Animal Trials Systematically (RATS)Group. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?BMJ. (2004) 328:514–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7438.514

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205.

  ArrowsmithJ. A decade of change. Nature Rev Drug Disc. (2012) 11:17–8. doi: 10.1038/nrd3630

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206.

  PoundP. Are animal models needed to discover, develop and test pharmaceutical drugs for humans in the 21st century?Animals. (2020) 10:2455. doi: 10.3390/ani10122455

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207.

  SinghVPPratapKSinhaJDesirajuKBahalDKukretiR. Critical evaluation of challenges and future use of animals in experimentation for biomedical research. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. (2016) 29:551–61. doi: 10.1177/0394632016671728

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208.

  Alliance for Human Relevant Science. WHITE PAPERS. Accelerating the Growth of Human Relevant Life Sciences in the United Kingdom. A White Paper by the Alliance for Human Relevant Science. Available online at: https://www.humanrelevantscience.org/white-papers/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 209.

  Ritskes-HoitingaMPoundP. The role of systematic reviews in identifying the limitations of preclinical animal research, 2000-2022: part 1. J R Soc Med. (2022) 115:186–92. doi: 10.1177/01410768221093551

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210.

  Ritskes-HoitingaMPoundP. The role of systematic reviews in identifying the limitations of preclinical animal research, 2000-2022: part 2. J R Soc Med. (2022) 115:231–5. doi: 10.1177/01410768221100970

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 211.

  Science. A New Path to New Drugs: Finding Alternatives to Animal Testing. Available online at: https://www.science.org/content/resource/new-path-new-drugs-finding-alternatives-to-animal-testing/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 212.

  DowningNSShahNDAminawungJAPeaseAMZeitounJDKrumholzHMet al. Postmarket safety events among novel therapeutics approved by US Food and Drug Administration between 2001 and 2010. JAMA. (2017) 317:1854–63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5150

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213.

  European Commission. Animals in Science. EU Actions for the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. Available online at: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/chemicals/animals-science_en (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 214.

  European Commission. Roadmap Towards Phasing Out Animal Testing. Available online at: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/chemicals/reach/roadmap-towards-phasing-out-animal-testing_en (Accessed August 29, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 215.

  European Union. Save Cruelty Free Cosmetics - Commit to a Europe Without Animal Testing. Available online at: https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/save-cruelty-free-cosmetics-commit-europe-without-animal-testing_en (Accessed August 29, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 216.

  WalderLPalloccaGBastosLFBeekhuijzenMBusquetFConstantinoHet al. EU roadmap for phasing out animal testing for chemical safety assessments: recommendations from a multi-stakeholder roundtable. ALTEX. (2025) 42:435–50. doi: 10.14573/altex.2503241

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217.

  Congress.gov. S.2759. FDA Modernization Act of 2021. Available online at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2759 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 218.

  U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/files/newsroom/published/roadmap_to_reducing_animal_testing_in_preclinical_safety_studies.pdf (Accessed August 29, 2025).

• 219.

  National Institute of Health (NIH). How Does the NIH Initiative to Prioritize Human-Based Research Affect Research Proposing the Use of Laboratory Animals? Available online at: https://grants.nih.gov/news-events/nih-extramural-nexus-news/2025/07/how-does-the-nih-initiative-to-prioritize-human-based-research-affect-research-proposing-the-use-of-laboratory-animals (Accessed August 29, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 220.

  World Health Organization (WHO). School Policy Framework: Implementation of the WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43923 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 221.

  MotevalliMStanfordFCGüntherAWirnitzerKC. Integrating lifestyle behaviors in school education: a proactive approach to preventive medicine. Prevent Med Rep. (2025) 51:102999. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.102999

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 222.

  LeeALoASCKeungMWKwongCMAWongKK. Effective health promoting school for better health of children and adolescents: indicators for success. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:1088. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7425-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223.

  KaminTKoroušić SeljakBFidler MisN. Water wins, communication matters: school-based intervention to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and increase intake of water. Nutrients. (2022) 14:1346. doi: 10.3390/nu14071346

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 224.

  Da ParenteCMDarósM. Compared analysis of the school day in European Union countries. Cad Pesqui. (2020) 50:78–94. doi: 10.1590/198053146760

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225.

  ZajacovaALawrenceEM. The relationship between education and health: reducing disparities through a contextual approach. Annu Rev Public Health. (2018) 39:273–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044628

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 226.

  LenzB. The transition from adolescence to young adulthood: a theoretical perspective. J Sch Nurs. (2001) 17:300–6. doi: 10.1177/10598405010170060401

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 227.

  BauldryS. Conditional health-related benefits of higher education: an assessment of compensatory versus accumulative mechanisms. Soc Sci Med. (2014) 111:94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 228.

  RaghupathiVRaghupathiW. The influence of education on health: an empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995-2015. Arch Public Health. (2020) 78:20. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00402-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 229.

  Health Promoting Schools. Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-promoting-schools#tab=tab_1 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

• 230.

  WirnitzerKCDrenowatzCCoccaATanousDRMotevalliMWirnitzerGet al. Health behaviors of austrian secondary level pupils at a glance: first results of the from science 2 school study focusing on sports linked to mixed, vegetarian, and vegan diets. Int J Env Res Pub Health. (2021) 18:12782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312782

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 231.

  WirnitzerKCMotevalliMCoccaATanousDRWirnitzerGWagnerKHet al. Health behavior of Austrian tertiary students focusing on diet type linked to sports and exercise—first glimpse of results from the “sustainably healthy—from science 2 high school and university” study. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1129004. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232.

  JakobovichRBerryEMLevitaALevin-ZamirD. Developing healthy lifestyle behaviors in early age-an intervention study in kindergartens. Nutrients. (2023) 15:2615. doi: 10.3390/nu15112615

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 233.

  FunkSGiladEWatkinsCJansenVA. The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2009) 106:6872–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810762106

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234.

  Eurydice. Compulsory Education in Europe 2022/2023. Available online at: https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/publications/compulsory-education-europe-20222023 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 235.

  European Comission (EC). Policy Fields. YouthWiki. Available online at: https://national-policies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/policy-fields (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 236.

  School Education Gateway. Compulsory Education in Europe (2022). Available online at: https://www.schooleducationgateway.eu/en/pub/resources/publications/compulsory-ed-in-europe.htm (Accessed June 23, 2023).

  • Google Scholar

• 237.

  GreerSLFalkenbachMSicilianiLMcKeeMWismarMFiguerasJ. From health in all policies to health for all policies. Lancet Public Health. (2022) 7:e718–20. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00155-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238.

  LeeALoALiQKeungVKwongA. Health promoting schools: an update. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. (2020) 18:605–23. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00575-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 239.

  PulimenoMPiscitelliPColazzoSColaoAMianiA. School as ideal setting to promote health and wellbeing among young people. Health Promot Perspect. (2020) 10:316–24. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.50

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 240.

  FrechA. Pathways to adulthood and changes in health-promoting behaviors. Adv Life Course Res. (2014) 19:40–9. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2013.12.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 241.

  KellySMartinSKuhnICowanABrayneCLafortuneL. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake and maintenance of healthy behaviours by people at mid-life: a rapid systematic review. PLoS ONE. (2016) 11:e0145074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145074

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 242.

  FewtrellMBronskyJCampoyCDomellöfMEmbletonNFidler MisNet al. Complementary feeding: a position paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2017) 64:119–32. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001454

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 243.

  Fidler MisNBraeggerCBronskyJCampoyCDomellöfMEmbletonNDet al. Sugar in infants, children and adolescents: a position paper of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2017) 65:681–96. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001733

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 244.

  HardcastleSJHancoxJHattarAMaxwell-SmithCThøgersen-NtoumaniC. Hagger MS. Motivating the unmotivated: how can health behavior be changed in those unwilling to change?Front Psychol. (2015) 6:835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00835

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 245.

  MichaelsenMMEschT. Understanding health behavior change by motivation and reward mechanisms: a review of the literature. Front Behav Neurosci. (2023) 17:1151918. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1151918

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 246.

  MoserAMStiglerFLHaditschB. Physicians' responsibility for planetary health. Lancet Planet Health. (2017) 1:e56. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30023-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 247.

  StoumposAIKitsiosFTaliasMA. Digital Transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20:3407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043407

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 248.

  TangcharoensathienVKanchanachitraCThomasRHeaden PfitzerJWhitneyP. Addressing the health of vulnerable populations: a call for papers. Bull World Health Organ. (2016) 94:235. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.172783

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 249.

  FarhudDAryanZ. Circadian rhythm, lifestyle and health: a narrative review. Iran J Public Health. (2018) 47:1068–76.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 250.

  BrownsellSBradleyDBlackburnSCardinauxFHawleyMS. A systematic review of lifestyle monitoring technologies. J Telemed Telecare. (2011) 17:185–9. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100803

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 251.

  HowickJKoletsiDPandisNFlemingPSLoefMWalachHet al. The quality of evidence for medical interventions does not improve or worsen: a metaepidemiological study of Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. (2020) 126:154–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 252.

  DahlgrenGWhiteheadM. The main determinants of health, Chapter 3: Understanding the different policy levels. 1991. In:DahlgrenGWhiteheadM, editors. Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health. Background document to WHO – Strategy paper for Europe. Stockholm, Sweden: Institute for Futures Studies (2007). p. 11. ISBN: 978-91-85619-18-4.

  • Google Scholar

• 253.

  ShahzadMUpshurRDonnellyPBharmalAWeiXFengPet al. A population-based approach to integrated healthcare delivery: a scoping review of clinical care and public health collaboration. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:708. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7002-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 254.

  KranzRMKettlerCKoederCHusainSAnandCSchochNet al. Health economic evaluation of a controlled lifestyle intervention: the healthy lifestyle community program (Cohort 2; HLCP-2). Nutrients. (2023) 15:5045. doi: 10.3390/nu15245045

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 255.

  MulijonoD. Healing with food or managing with injection? A new era in chronic disease care. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. (2025) 6:373–7. doi: 10.37871/jbres2092

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 256.

  YaseenNRBarnesCLKSunLTakedaARiceJP. Genetics of vegetarianism: a genome-wide association study. PLoS ONE. (2023) 18:e0291305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291305

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 257.

  ScaglioniSDe CosmiVCiappolinoVParazziniFBrambillaPAgostoniC. Factors influencing children's eating behaviors. Nutrients. (2018) 10:706. doi: 10.3390/nu10060706

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 258.

  CannonGLeitzmannC. Food and nutrition science: the new paradigm. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2022) 31:1–15. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202203_31(1).0001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 259.

  BarisicALeatherdaleSTKreigerN. Importance of frequency, intensity, time and type (FITT) in physical activity assessment for epidemiological research. Can J Public Health. (2011) 102:174–5. doi: 10.1007/BF03404889

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 260.

  BullFCAl-AnsariSSBiddleSBorodulinKBumanMPCardonGet al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. (2020) 54:1451–62. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 261.

  EconomosCDHatfieldDPKingACAyalaGXPentzMA. Food and physical activity environments: an energy balance approach for research and practice. Am J Prev Med. (2015) 48:620–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 262.

  European Commission (EC). Public Health. EU4Health Programme 2021-2027: A Vision for a Healthier European Union. Available online at: https://health.ec.europa.eu/funding/eu4health-programme-2021-2027-vision-healthier-european-union_en (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 263.

  SagnerMMcNeilAPuskaPAuffrayCPriceNDHoodLet al. The P4 health spectrum - a predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory continuum for promoting healthspan. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. (2017) 59:506–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.08.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 264.

  WHO. Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2030 (2021). Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031029 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 265.

  KarnaBSankariATatikondaG. Sleep disorder. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing (2025). Available online at:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560720/

  • Google Scholar

• 266.

  CoccaAEspino VerdugoFRódenas CuencaLTCoccaM. Effect of a game-based physical Education program on physical fitness and mental health in elementary school children. Int J Env Res Pub Health. (2020) 17:4883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134883

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 267.

  SiegristMLammelCHallerBChristleJHalleM. Effects of a physical education program on physical activity, fitness, and health in children: the JuvenTUM project. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2013) 23:323–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01387.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 268.

  DahlgrenGWhiteheadM. European strategies for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 2. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe (Studies on social and economic determinants of population health, No. 3). WHO Collaborating Centre for Policy Research on social Determinants of Health, University of Liverpool (2007). p. 20. WHOLIS E89384.

  • Google Scholar

• 269.

  SzajewskaH. Evidence-based medicine and clinical research: both are needed, neither is perfect. Ann Nutr Metab. (2018) 72(Suppl 3):13–23. doi: 10.1159/000487375

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 270.

  StamlerJNeatonJD. The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT)—importance then and now. JAMA. (2008) 300:1343–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.11.1343

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 271.

  WadmanM. FDA no longer needs to require animal tests before human drug trials. Science. (2023) 379:127–8. doi: 10.1126/science.adg6276

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 272.

  Ritskes-HoitingaM. Medical regulators: look beyond animal tests. Nature. (2022) 604:599. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01110-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 273.

  JonesPWirnitzerK. Hodges' model: the sustainable development goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. (2022) 5:358–63. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000254

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 274.

  MoynihanRHeathIHenryD. Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering. BMJ. (2002) 324:886–90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7342.886

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 275.

  llichI. Die Nemesis der Medizin. Die Kritik der Medikalisierung des Lebens. München: C. H. Beck (2022). ISBN: 978-3-406-77679-3.

  • Google Scholar

• 276.

  AngellM. The truth about the drug companies: how they deceive us and what to do about it. BMJ. (2004) 329:862. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7470.862

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 277.

  GodleeF. Editor's Choice. Doctors. patients, and the drug industry. BMJ. (2009) 338:b463.

  • Google Scholar

• 278.

  CumminsAG. Rapid response to: Doctors, patients, and the drug industry. BMJ. (2009) 338:b463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b463

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 279.

  GøtzschePC. Our prescription drugs kill us in large numbers. Pol Arch Med Wewn. (2014) 124:628–34. doi: 10.20452/pamw.2503

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 280.

  BeardsleyRSGardockiGJLarsonDBHidalgoJ. Prescribing of psychotropic medication by primary care physicians and psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry (1998) 45:1117–9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800360065009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 281.

  MaaniNCollinJFrielSGilmoreABMcCambridgeJRobertsonLet al. Bringing the commercial determinants of health out of the shadows: a review of how the commercial determinants are represented in conceptual frameworks. Eur J Public Health. (2020) 30:660–4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz197

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 282.

  McCartneyGPophamFMcMasterRCumbersA. Defining health and health inequalities. Public Health. (2019) 172:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 283.

  MonteiroCACannonGMoubaracJCLevyRBLouzadaMLCJaimePC. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. (2018) 21:5–17. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000234

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 284.

  MonteiroCALawrenceMMillettCNestleMPopkinBMScrinisGet al. The need to reshape global food processing: a call to the United Nations Food Systems Summit. BMJ Global Health. (2021) 6:e006885. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006885

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 285.

  LugerMLafontanMBes-RastrolloMWinzerEYumukVFarpour-LambertN. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review from 2013 to 2015 and a comparison with previous studies. Obes Facts. (2017) 10:674–93. doi: 10.1159/000484566

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 286.

  JohnsonRKAppelLJBrandsMHowardBVLefevreMLustigRHet al. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2009) 120:1011–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192627

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 287.

  BendorCDBardugoAPinhas-HamielOAfekATwigG. Cardiovascular morbidity, diabetes and cancer risk among children and adolescents with severe obesity. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2020) 19:79. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01052-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 288.

  KoletzkoBFishbeinMLeeWSMorenoLMouaneNMouzakiMet al. Prevention of childhood obesity: a position paper of the Global Federation of International Societies of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (FISPGHAN). J Ped Gastroent Nutr. (2020) 70:702–10. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002708

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 289.

  FangFCCasadevallA. Reductionistic and holistic science. Infect Immun. (2011) 79:1401–4. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01343-10

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 290.

  European Union (EU). Health. Supporting public health in Europe. Available online at: https://european-union.europa.eu/priorities-and-actions/actions-topic/health_en (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 291.

  GotbaumR. The Fauci Phenomenon, Part 2 (2023). Perspective Intention to Treat. NEJM. (2023) 388:e40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2300938

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 292.

  KrattenmacherJCasalPDutkiewiczJHuchardESandersETreichNet al. Universities should lead on the plant-based dietary. Lancet Planet Health. (2023) 7:e354–5. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00082-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 293.

  Plant-Based Universities Open Letter. Available online at: https://www.plantbaseduniversities.org/post/plant-based-universities-open-letter?fbclid=IwAR2-kDC2_F3v9yhhS3PPb6KOpYR2WHqZEamA2SPLOzF47f7wQVxrIPKy_sQ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 294.

  EbellMHSokolRLeeASimonsCEarlyJ. How good is the evidence to support primary care practice?Evid Based Med. (2017) 22:88–92. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110704

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 295.

  SmithRChenKWinnerDFriedhoffSWardleC. A systematic review of COVID-19 misinformation interventions: lessons learned. Health Affairs. (2023) 42:1738–46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00717

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 296.

  SpeicherDJ. DNA Fragments Detected in Monovalent and Bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 Vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory Dose Response Relationship with Serious Adverse Events. Available online at: https://osf.io/xv3nz/?fbclid=IwAR0pebFs2pPsPCCWNOH7O4WoXOhvTgcyLbgKs8MQGZUiQmi3dShWt7gGR4U_aem_AYRf8u_E-H3Yw7Cqwo9OmCeChTxfAeXSNeP2huVQ0Vay5HoutZ5KOutcAmaOx1eT5Mo (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 297.

  HowickJKoletsiDIoannidisJPAMadiganCPandisNLoefMet al. Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. (2022) 148:160–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 298.

  IoannidisJPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. (2005) 2:e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 299.

  AngellM. Relationships with the drug industry: keep at arm's length. Analysis. BMJ. (2009) 338:b222. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b222

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 300.

  HortonR. Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma?Lancet. (2015) 385:1380. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60696-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 301.

  GreenbergSA. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. BMJ. (2009) 339:b2680. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2680

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 302.

  IoannidisJPA. How to make more published research true. PLoS Med. (2014) 11:e1001747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 303.

  GylesC. Skeptical of medical science reports?Can Vet J. (2015) 56:1011–2.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 304.

  Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC). Available online at: https://evidencesynthesis.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ESE?mode=global (Accessed August 29, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 305.

  Man or Mouse? Why Drug Research has taken the Wrong Turning. New Scientist. Leader and Health (2016). Available online at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23230973-700-man-or-mouse/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 306.

  How the ‘Mouse Man' Changed Medical Research. New Scientist. Life (2009). Available online at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126922-000-how-the-mouse-man-changed-medical-research/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 307.

  Alliance for Human Relevant Science (Altern Lab Anim. 2017;45:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291704500109). Accelerating the Growth of Human Relevant Life Sciences in the United Kingdom. A White Paper by the Alliance for Human Relevant Science. UK (2020). Available online at: https://www.humanrelevantscience.org/white-papers/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 308.

  ManuppelloJSlankster-SchmiererEBakerESullivanK. Animal use and opportunities for reduction in carcinogenicity studies supporting approved new drug applications in the U.S., 2015–2019. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. (2023) 137:105289. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105289

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 309.

  LeenaarsCHCKouwenaarCStafleuFRBleichARitskes-HoitingaMDe VriesRBMet al. Animal to human translation: a systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates. J Transl Med. (2019) 17:223. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1976-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 310.

  von KortzfleischVTAmbréeOKarpNAMeyerNNovakJPalmeRet al. Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies?PLoS Biol. (2022) 20:e3001564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001564

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 311.

  von KortzfleischVTAmbréeOKarpNAMeyerNNovakJPalmeRet al. Correction: Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies?PLoS Biol. (2022) 20:e3001948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001948

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 312.

  de VriesRBBumaPLeenaarsMRitskes-HoitingaMGordijnB. Reducing the number of laboratory animals used in tissue engineering research by restricting the variety of animal models. Articular cartilage tissue engineering as a case study. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. (2012) 18:427–35. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0059

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 313.

  Ritskes-HoitingaMBarellaYKleinhout-VliekT. The promises of speeding up: changes in requirements for animal studies and alternatives during COVID-19 Vaccine Approval-A Case Study. Animals. (2022) 12:1735. doi: 10.3390/ani12131735

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 314.

  SwatersDvan VeenAvan MeursWTurnerJERitskes-HoitingaM. A history of regulatory animal testing: what can we learn?Altern Lab Anim. (2022) 50:322–9. doi: 10.1177/02611929221118001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 315.

  ZemanovaBKnightA. The educational efficacy of humane teaching methods: a systematic review of the evidence. Animals. (2021) 11:114. doi: 10.3390/ani11010114

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 316.

  Ärzte gegen Tierversuche e.V. (Ägt). Schwerpunkt: Ohne Tierleid durchs Studium? ÄgT - Ärzte gegen Tierversuche Journal. (2022) 4:1–11.

  • Google Scholar

• 317.

  GerlachC. SATIS - Projekt für eine human Ausbildung. Schwerpunkt: Ohne Tierleid durchs Studium? ÄgT - Ärzte gegen Tierversuche Journal. (2022) 4:10. Available online at: https://www.satis-tierrechte.de (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 318.

  JanssensMRESalvatoriDHogervorstJNonisCBaileyJBajramovicJet al. Developing a global education hub for animal-free innovation. ALTEX. (2025) 42:354–7. doi: 10.14573/altex.2411251

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 319.

  FWF. Ersatzmethoden für Tierversuche. Jährliche Forschungsförderung “Ersatzmethoden für Tierversuche”. Available online at: https://www.fwf.ac.at/de/forschungsfoerderung/fwf-programme/ersatzmethoden-tierversuche (Accessed May 23, 2023). and Available online at: https://www.fwf.ac.at/foerdern/foerderportfolio/themenfoerderungen/ersatzmethoden-fuer-tierversuche and https://www.fwf.ac.at/aktuelles/detail/neue-ersatzmethoden-fuer-tierversuche-erforschen#:~:text=Der%20Wissenschaftsfonds%20FWF%20f%C3%B6rdert%20in,Belastung%20von%20Tieren%20zu%20mindern (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 320.

  AdashiEYO'MahonyDPCohenIG. The FDA modernization Act 2.0: drug testing in animals is rendered optional. Am J Med. (2023) 136:853–4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.03.033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 321.

  SGF - Samenwerkende GezondheidsFondsen. Langer gezond leven voor iedereen in Nederland. Programma Gezonde Generatie. Available online at: https://www.gezondheidsfondsen.nl/activiteit/preventieprogramma-gezonde-generatie/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 322.

  ZonMw. ValNAM: Validating and Implementing New Approach Methodologies in a Regulatory Context. Available online at: https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/subsidie/valnam-validating-and-implementing-new-approach-methodologies-regulatory-context (Accessed August 29, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 323.

  Utrecht University. Ombion Centre for Animal-free Biomedical Translation Celebrates Launch and Site Opening. Available online at: https://www.uu.nl/en/news/ombion-centre-for-animal-free-biomedical-translation-celebrates-launch-and-site-opening (Accessed August 29, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 324.

  Ärzte gegen Tierversuche e.V. (ÄgT). Ausgezeichnet: NAT-Datenbank für tierversuchsfreie Methoden. ÄgT - Ärzte gegen Tierversuche Journal. (2023) 1:1–7.

  • Google Scholar

• 325.

  ZonMW. The NAM Navigator: A Repository on Validation and Acceptance of New Approach Methodologies. Available online at: https://www.zonmw.nl/en/news/nam-navigator-repository-validation-and-acceptance-new-approach-methodologies (Accessed August 29, 2025).

  • Google Scholar

• 326.

  Eurogroup for Animals. Use of Animals in Research, Testing and Education. Headline Report for Eurogroup for Animals (2022). Animal Research Poll – Eurogroup for Animals – 31 March 2023. Available online at: https://savanta.com/knowledge-centre/published-polls/animal-research-poll-eurogroup-for-animals-31-march-2023/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 327.

  European Citizens' Initiative. Save Cruelty Free Cosmetics - Commit to a Europe Without Animal Testing. Commission registration number: ECI(2021)000006 (2023). Available online at: https://europa.eu/citizens-initiative/initiatives/details/2021/000006_en (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 328.

  Committees European Parliament. Hearing in the European Parliament on the European Citizens' Initiative ”Save Cruelty-Free Cosmetics. Save cruelty-free cosmetics – Commit to a Europe without animal testing (2023). Available online at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/save-cruelty-free-cosmetics-commit-to-a-/product-details/20230502CHE11661 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 329.

  LazarusJVRomeroDKopkaCJKarimSAAbu-RaddadLJAlmeidaGet al. A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat. Nature. (2022) 611:332–45. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05398-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 330.

  MallahSIGhorabOKAl-SalmiSAbdellatifOSTharmaratnamTIskandarMAet al. COVID-19: breaking down a global health crisis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. (2021) 20:35. doi: 10.1186/s12941-021-00438-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 331.

  AlfanoVErcolanoS. The efficacy of lockdown against COVID-19: a cross-country panel analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. (2020) 18:509–17. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00596-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 332.

  HaugNGeyrhoferLLondeiADervicEDesvars-LarriveALoretoVet al. Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nat Hum Behav. (2020) 4:1303–12. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 333.

  AzzouziSStrattonCMuñoz-VelascoLPWangKFourtassiMHongBYet al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthy lifestyle behaviors and perceived mental and physical health of people living with non-communicable diseases: an international cross-sectional survey. Int J Env Res Pub Health. (2022) 19:8023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 334.

  KengSLStantonMVHaskinsLBAlmenaraCAIckovicsJJonesAet al. COVID-19 stressors and health behaviors: a multilevel longitudinal study across 86 countries. Prev Med Rep. (2022) 27:101764.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 335.

  MotevalliMDrenowatzCWirnitzerKCTanousDRWirnitzerGKirschnerWet al. Changes in physical activity during the COVID-19 lockdown based on the sociodemographic profile of 5569 students and academic staff of Austrian universities. Public Health. (2023) 219:102–9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.04.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 336.

  BozkurtAKarakayaKTurkMKarakayaÖCastellanos-ReyesD. The impact of COVID-19 on education: a meta-narrative review. TechTrends. (2022) 66:883–96. doi: 10.1007/s11528-022-00759-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 337.

  ChaturvediKVishwakarmaDKSinghN. COVID-19 and its impact on education, social life and mental health of students: a survey. Child Youth Serv Rev. (2021) 121:105866. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105866

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 338.

  World Health Organization. #HealthyAtHome - Physical Activity. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/campaigns/connecting-the-world-to-combat-coronavirus/healthyathome/healthyathome—physical-activity (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 339.

  World Health Organization. #HealthyAtHome: Healthy Diet. Available online at: https://www.who.int/campaigns/connecting-the-world-to-combat-coronavirus/healthyathome/healthyathome—healthy-diet (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 340.

  KimHRebholzCMHegdeSLaFiuraCRaghavanMLloydJFet al. Plant-based diets, pescatarian diets and COVID-19 severity: a population-based case-control study in six countries. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. (2021) 4:257–66. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000272

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 341.

  StorzMA. Lifestyle Adjustments in long-COVID management: potential benefits of plant-based diets. Curr Nutr Rep. (2021) 10:352–63. doi: 10.1007/s13668-021-00369-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 342.

  CerasolaDArganoCCorraoS. Lessons from COVID-19: physical exercise can improve and optimize health status. Front Med. (2022) 9:834844. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.834844

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 343.

  DwyerMJPasiniMDe DominicisSRighiE. Physical activity: benefits and challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2020) 30:1291–4. doi: 10.1111/sms.13710

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 344.

  MerinoJJoshiADNguyenLHLeemingERMazidiMDrewDAet al. Diet quality and risk and severity of COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Gut. (2021) 70:2096–104. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325353

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 345.

  NiemanDC. Coronavirus disease-2019: a tocsin to our aging, unfit, corpulent, and immunodeficient society. J Sport Health Sci. (2020) 9:293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.05.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 346.

  MarconcinPWerneckAOPeraltaMIhleAGouveiaÉRFerrariGet al. The association between physical activity and mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. (2022) 22:209. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12590-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 347.

  EzzatvarYRamírez-VélezRIzquierdoMGarcia-HermosoA. Physical activity and risk of infection, severity and mortality of COVID-19: a systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis of data from 1 853 610 adults. Br J Sports Med. (2022) 1–7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105733

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 348.

  KhoramipourKBaserehAHekmatikarAACastellLRuheeRTSuzukiK. Physical activity and nutrition guidelines to help with the fight against COVID-19. J Sports Sci. (2021) 39:101–7. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1807089

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 349.

  SmirmaulBPCChamonRFde MoraesFMRozinGMoreiraASBde AlmeidaRet al. Lifestyle medicine during (and after) the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2020) 15:60–7. doi: 10.1177/1559827620950276

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 350.

  Balanzá-MartínezVAtienza-CarbonellBKapczinskiFDe BoniRB. Lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19 - time to connect. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2020) 141:399–400. doi: 10.1111/acps.13177

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 351.

  NiemanDC. Exercise is medicine for immune function: implication for COVID-19. Curr Sports Med Rep. (2021) 20:395–401. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000867

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 352.

  Jimeno-AlmazánAPallarésJGBuendía-RomeroÁMartínez-CavaAFranco-LópezFSánchez-Alcaraz MartínezBJet al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome and the potential benefits of exercise. Int J Env Res Pub Health. (2021) 18:5329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105329

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 353.

  FaghyMAArenaRStonerLHarafRHJosephsonRHillsAPet al. The need for exercise sciences and an integrated response to COVID-19: a position statement from the international HL-PIVOT network. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. (2021) 67:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.01.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 354.

  SallisRYoungDRTartofSYSallisJFSallJLiQet al. Physical inactivity is associated with a higher risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes: a study in 48 440 adult patients. Br J Sports Med. (2021) 55:1099–105. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104080

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 355.

  ChenPMaoLNassisGPHarmerPAinsworthBELiF. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): the need to maintain regular physical activity while taking precautions. J Sport Health Sci. (2020) 9:103–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.02.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 356.

  HughesHEHughesTCMorbeyRChallenKOliverISmithGEet al. Emergency department use during COVID-19 as described by syndromic surveillance. Emerg Med J. (2020) 37:600–4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209980

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 357.

  JakobssonJMalmCFurbergMEkelundUSvenssonM. Physical activity during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: prevention of a decline in metabolic and immunological functions. Front Sports Act Living. (2020) 2:57. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00057

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 358.

  WoodsJAHutchinsonNTPowersSKRobertsWOGomez-CabreraMCRadakZet al. The COVID-19 pandemic and physical activity. Sports Med Health Sci. (2020) 2:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2020.05.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 359.

  MoradianNOchsHDSedikiesCHamblinMRCamargoCAJr MartinezJAet al. The urgent need for integrated science to fight COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Transl Med. (2020) 18:205. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02364-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 360.

  MattioliAVSciomerSCocchiCMaffeiSGallinaS. Quarantine during COVID-19 outbreak: Changes in diet and physical activity increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2020) 30:1409–17. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.05.020

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 361.

  KhanA. The Best Exercises and Diet Tips Pre, Post and During COVID-19: Necessary Exercises to Reduce the Covid-19 Risk (2021).

  • Google Scholar

• 362.

  ChastinSFMAbaraoguUBourgoisJGDallPMDarnboroughJDuncanEet al. Effects of regular physical activity on the immune system, vaccination and risk of community-acquired infectious disease in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. (2021) 51:1673–86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01466-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 363.

  KahleovaHBerrien-LopezRHoltzDGreenASheinbergRGujralHet al. Nutrition for hospital workers during a crisis: effect of a plant-based dietary intervention on cardiometabolic outcomes and quality of life in healthcare employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Lifestyle Med. (2021) 16:399–407. doi: 10.1177/15598276211050339

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 364.

  StancicSCullimoreJBarnardD. Shoring up vaccine efficacy. Am J Med. (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.09.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 365.

  de Faria Coelho-RavagnaniCCorgosinhoFCSanchesFFZPradoCMMLavianoAMotaJF. Dietary recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutr Rev. (2021) 79:382–93. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa067

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 366.

  Durand-MoreauQMackenzieGAdiseshAStraubeSChanXHSZelyasNet al. Twitter analytics to inform provisional guidance for COVID-19 challenges in the meatpacking industry. Ann Work Expo Health. (2021) 65:373–6. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa123

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 367.

  Durand-MoreauQAdiseshAMackenzieGBowleyJStraubeSChanXHet al. COVID-19 in meat and poultry facilities: a rapid review and lay media analysis. The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2020). Available online at: https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/what-explains-the-high-rate-of-sars-cov-2-transmission-in-meat-and-poultry-facilities-2/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 368.

  The Lancet's Editorial. We need to talk about meat. Lancet. (2018) 392:P2237. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32971-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 369.

  WHO. Cancer: Carcinogenicity of the Consumption of Red Meat and Processed Meat (2015). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 370.

  MirallesOSanchez-RodriguezDMarcoEAnnweilerCBaztanABetancorÉet al. Unmet needs, health policies, and actions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a report from six European countries. Eur Geriatr Med. (2021) 12:193–204. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00415-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 371.

  FilipRGheorghita PuscaseluRAnchidin-NorocelLDimianMSavageWK. Global challenges to public health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of pandemic measures and problems. J Pers Med. (2022) 12:1295. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081295

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 372.

  PettKDWillettWCVartiainenEKatzDL. The seven countries study. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38:3119–21. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx603

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 373.

  AnderssonCJohnsonADBenjaminEJLevyDVasanRS. 70-year legacy of the Framingham Heart Study. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2019) 16:687–98. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0202-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 374.

  VartiainenE. The North Karelia Project: cardiovascular disease prevention in Finland. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. (2018) 2018:13. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2018.13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 375.

  CampbellTCCampbellTM. The China Study. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books (2016).

  • Google Scholar

• 376.

  CampbellTC. Center for Nutrition Studies. A History of the China Study. The China Project. Available online at: https://nutritionstudies.org/the-china-study/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 377.

  von KoerberKLeitzmannC. Vollwert-Ernährung: Konzeption einer zeitgemäßen und nachhaltigen Ernährung. Haug (2012).

  • Google Scholar

• 378.

  LeitzmannCKellerM. Vegetarische und vegane Ernährung. 4, vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage UTB (2020).

  • Google Scholar

• 379.

  LeitzmannCCannonG. The New Nutrition Science project. Public Health Nutr. (2005) 8(6A):673–94. doi: 10.1079/PHN2005819

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 380.

  XingYYangSDWangMMFengYSDongFZhangF. The beneficial role of exercise training for myocardial infarction treatment in elderly. Front Physiol. (2020) 11:270. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00270

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 381.

  OwenAWilesJSwaineI. Effect of isometric exercise on resting blood pressure: a meta-analysis. J Hum Hypertens. (2010) 24:796–800. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 382.

  StoddenDFGoodwayJDLangendorferSJRobertonMARudisillMEGarciaCet al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest. (2008) 60:290–306. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 383.

  RobertsCFreemanJSamdalOSchnohrCWde LoozeMENic GabhainnSet al. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: methodological developments and current tensionsInt J Public Health. (2009) 54(Suppl 2):140–50. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-5405-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 384.

  Tapia-FonllemCFraijo-SingBCorral-VerdugoVGarza-TeránGMoreno-BarahonaM. School environments and elementary school children's well-being in Northwestern Mexico. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:510. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00510

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 385.

  University of Oxford. The EPIC-Oxford Study. Available online at: https://www.ceu.ox.ac.uk/research/epic-oxford-1 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 386.

  Loma Linda University. Health. Adventist Health Study. https://adventisthealthstudy.org/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 387.

  BuettnerD. 10 Blue Zones Food Guidelines. Blue Zones Project by Healthways. Sept 12, 2017. Available online at: https://www.bluezones.com/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 388.

  Eurostat. Statistics Explained. Healthy life Years Statistics (2023). Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Healthy_life_years_statistics (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 389.

  Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. (2015) 386:743–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 390.

  GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1204–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 391.

  YanDLiuKLiFShiDWeiLZhangJet al. Global burden of ischemic heart disease associated with high red and processed meat consumption: an analysis of 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2019. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23:2267. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16954-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 392.

  Österreichische Gesundheitskasse (ÖGK). Vegetarismus und Veganismus (2019). https://www.gesundheitskasse.at/cdscontent/load?contentid=10008.692090&version=1574258313 (Accessed June 21, 2023).

  • Google Scholar

• 393.

  BKK adVita. Nachhaltig gesund. BKK advita kämpft für alternatives Vorsorgeangebot für Menschen mit überwiegend veganer oder vegetarischer. Ernährung (2016). Available online at:https://www.bkk24.de (Accessed September 12, 2017).

  • Google Scholar

• 394.

  BKK adVita. Ihre Belohnung für eine gesunde Ernährung (2016). Available online at: https://www.bkk24.de/(Accessed September 12, 2017).

  • Google Scholar

• 395.

  BKK ProVita. Die Kasse fürs Leben. Vegetarische und vegane Ernährung—die BKK ProVita klärt auf und unterstützt ihre Versicherten (2016). Available online at: https://bkk-provita.de (Accessed September 12, 2017).

  • Google Scholar

• 396.

  BKK ProVita. Die Leistungen der BKK ProVita im Zusammenhang mit pflanzlicher Ernährung (2016). Available online at: https://bkk-provita.de/ (Accessed September 12, 2017).

  • Google Scholar

• 397.

  Vienna Insurance Group (VIG). Vegetarische und vegan Ernährung. Vorteile, Nachteile und ob es tatsächlich häufig zu Mangelerscheinungen kommt (2015). Available online at: https://www.wienerstaedtische.at/ (Accessed September 30, 2015).

  • Google Scholar

• 398.

  Vienna Insurance Group (VIG). Leben Vegetarier gesünder? Gesundheitliche Aspekte der vegetarischen und veganen Ernährung (2015). Available online at: https://www.wienerstaedtische.at/ (Accessed September 30, 2015).

  • Google Scholar

• 399.

  SalehSEl HarakehABaroudMZeineddineNFarahASibaiAM. Costs associated with management of non-communicable diseases in the Arab Region: a scoping review. J Glob Health. (2018) 8:020410. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020410

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 400.

  Lopes-JúniorLCBomfimEOlsonKNevesETSilveiraDSCNunesMDRet al. Effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom management in paediatrics: systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. BMJ. (2020) 371:m4290. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4290

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 401.

  BanerjeeSFordC. Sensory Rooms for Patients with Dementia in Long-Term Care: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (2018). Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537804/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 402.

  BirdeeGSRothmanRLSohlSJWertenbakerDWheelerABossartCet al. Feasibility and safety of intradialysis yoga and education in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. (2015) 25:445–53. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2015.02.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 403.

  HelliwellJFLayardRSachsJDAkninLBDe NeveJ-EWangS. World Happiness Report 2023. Available online at: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2023/ (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 404.

  SitheyGThow AM LiM. Gross national happiness and health: lessons from Bhutan. Bull World Health Organ. (2015) 93:514. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.160754

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 405.

  SolanM. The Secret to Happiness? Here's Some Advice from the Longest-Running Study on Happiness. Harvard Health Publishing. Harvard Medical School. Harvard Health Blog (2017). Available online at: https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-secret-to-happiness-heres-some-advice-from-the-longest-running-study-on-happiness-2017100512543 (Accessed March 23, 2024).

  • Google Scholar

• 406.

  PrynnJEKuperH. Perspective on disability and non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries, with a focus on stroke and dementia. Int J Env Res Pub Health. (2019) 16:3488. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183488

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 407.

  SzaszTS. The therapeutic state: the tyranny of pharmacracy. Independent Rev. (2001) 5:485–521. ISSN 1086-1653.

  • Google Scholar