ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets
This article is part of the Research TopicPioneering Sustainable Nutrition: Emerging Voices Transforming Global Food SystemsView all 5 articles
Never too late to try something new. Attitudes and intention to taste foods from alternative protein sources in a sample of Italian older adults
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- 2Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milan, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Nutrition in older adults requires special attention due to protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) risk. Therefore, identifying healthy and sustainable protein sources is crucial, as traditional animal proteins pose challenges to both health and the environment. While most research focuses on younger populations, this study examined the responses of older adults to three alternative protein sources (APS): one plant-based (PBF) and two animal-based sources: cultured meat (CM) and insect-based foods (IBF). We investigated the role of explicit and automatic attitudes in shaping intention to consume (ITC) and the influence of familiarity. Methods: A between-subjects design was performed: Each participant was randomly assigned to one APS, reported explicit attitudes and ITC, and completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT) to assess automatic attitudes. Results: Regression analyses showed that ITC varied across APS. For PBF, familiarity was the strongest predictor, followed by explicit attitudes related to taste and automatic attitudes. For CM, ITC was primarily associated with explicit attitudes concerning both taste and safety. For IBF, ICT was mainly related to explicit attitudes concerning taste. ANOVAs comparing the three APSs revealed that IBF was the least favored option. Unexpectedly, although PBF was rated as tastier and safer than CM, it was less preferred in terms of automatic attitudes and ITC. Discussion: These findings offer new insights into older adults' openness to APS. Disgust and perceived risk were identified as the primary factors influencing the acceptance of animal-based APS, while familiarity and automatic reactions were key factors in the acceptance of PBF. Importantly, although PBF received positive evaluations at the explicit level, it prompted negative automatic attitudes and low intention to consume, suggesting that older adults may implicitly resist PBF, viewing it as less compatible with their dietary habits compared to CM. This evidence challenges the common belief that PBF is the most accepted category of APS and highlights the need to investigate further the implicit barriers that may prevent the integration of these foods for healthy aging.
Keywords: Automatic Attitudes1, Explicit Attitudes2, Intentions3, IAT4, Plant-based Food5, Cultured Meat6, Insect-Based Food7
Received: 24 Sep 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Vanutelli, Adorni, Leone, Luperini, D'Addario and Steca. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Roberta  Adorni, roberta.adorni1@unimib.it
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
