Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 08 January 2026

Sec. Nutrition and Metabolism

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1728525

This article is part of the Research TopicThe role of Lipids in Relation to Preventing Inflammation and Chronic DiseasesView all 9 articles

Association between HDL-cholesterol subfractions and the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a single-center retrospective observational study

Yu Geng&#x;Yu Geng1Xingfei Deng&#x;Xingfei Deng2Yajun Xue&#x;Yajun Xue1Bin WangBin Wang1Qing LiuQing Liu1Tingting LvTingting Lv1Changhua LvChanghua Lv1Yifei Wang
&#x;Yifei Wang1*Ping Zhang
&#x;Ping Zhang1*
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  • 2Ardent BioMed LLC (ABIOM), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the association between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subfractions and long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Method: A total of 1,240 AMI patients admitted to Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between 2017 and 2023 were included. HDL subfractions, including HDL-2b and HDL-3, were quantified using microfluidic chip electrophoresis. Patients were stratified into tertiles according to HDL-3 levels. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACCEs. Kaplan–Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards models, restricted cubic spline (RCS), and mediation analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between HDL subfractions and MACCEs.

Result: During a median follow-up of 52.4 months, 132 MACCEs (10.7%) occurred. Patients in the highest HDL-3 tertile had a lower MACCEs incidence than those in the lowest tertile (6.7% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001). Higher HDL-3 levels were associated with improved event-free survival (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37–0.91) and demonstrated discriminative ability for MACCE risk (AUC = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.57–0.67), whereas HDL-C and HDL-2b were not significant. RCS analysis revealed a linear inverse association between HDL-3 and MACCEs (p for non-linearity = 0.356). The Gensini score partially mediated this relationship, accounting for 11.8% of the total effect.

Conclusion: Lower HDL-3 levels were independently associated with a higher long-term risk of MACCEs in AMI patients. HDL-3 may represent a potential biomarker for residual cardiovascular risk stratification and a potential therapeutic target for improving post-infarction outcomes.

1 Introduction

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide, with ischemic heart disease (IHD) representing the dominant contributor, accounting for 8.99 million deaths in 2021 (1). Among the modifiable risk factors, metabolic disturbances are major determinants of IHD, responsible for 46.21% of IHD-related deaths in 2021 (2). Over the past three decades, the global burden attributable to metabolic risk factors has increased by 1.6 to 3 times (3), highlighting their significance as key therapeutic targets in cardiovascular prevention.

Lipid-lowering therapy, particularly statin treatment, remains the cornerstone for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and preventing major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) (4, 5). However, despite the substantial benefits of LDL-C reduction, a considerable residual cardiovascular risk persists (6). This persistent risk has renewed attention on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), traditionally regarded as “good cholesterol” owing to its potential protective effects against atherosclerosis (7).

Nevertheless, accumulating evidence has challenged this traditional paradigm. Several cohort studies have reported a U-shaped association between HDL-C and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among patients with IHD (8), while randomized controlled trials aimed at pharmacologically increasing HDL-C levels failed to show reductions in cardiovascular events (9). These inconsistencies suggest that HDL-C functionality, rather than total HDL-C concentration, may better reflect cardiovascular protection.

HDL particles are highly heterogeneous, comprising distinct subfractions that differ in density, diameter, and biological function (10, 11). Large, cholesterol-rich HDL-2 particles (HDL-2a, HDL-2b) primarily facilitate reverse cholesterol transport, whereas small, dense HDL-3 particles (HDL-3a, HDL-3b, and HDL-3c) exhibit potent antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects (12, 13). Previous studies have demonstrated that small HDL particles are inversely associated with coronary disease severity and mortality among patients with IHD (1416).

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a major clinical manifestation of IHD, continues to be associated with substantial risks of recurrent events and long-term mortality despite advances in reperfusion therapy and secondary prevention (17, 18). However, evidence directly linking HDL subfractions to long-term outcomes in AMI remains limited. Moreover, variability in HDL subfraction measurement techniques across studies may contribute to heterogeneous findings. Therefore, this study used microfluidic chip electrophoresis to precisely quantify HDL subfractions (HDL-2b and HDL-3) and to evaluate their association with long-term MACCE risk in patients with AMI.

2 Method

2.1 Study population

This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with AMI who were admitted to Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between September 2017 and June 2023. Both ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: (1) missing serum samples for HDL subfraction measurement; (2) missing blood cholesterol data; (3) presence of active infection, autoimmune disease, severe hepatic or renal insufficiency, or malignancy; and (4) incomplete follow-up information.

A total of 1,240 patients were included in the final analysis (Figure 1). The study protocol was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (Approval No. 23578-4-01). Given the retrospective design, the requirement for written informed consent was waived.

Figure 1
Flowchart showing the patient selection process for a study on patients diagnosed with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), initially numbering 1,306. Exclusions were 14 for missing serum sample, 36 for missing blood cholesterol data, 6 for active infection, autoimmune disease, severe hepatic or renal insufficiency, and malignancy, and 10 for loss of follow-up. The final analysis included 1,240 patients.

Figure 1. Flowchart of patient inclusion and exclusion criteria.

2.2 Measurement of HDL subfractions

Fasting venous blood samples were collected within 24 h of hospital admission. Serum was separated and stored at −80 °C until analysis. HDL subfractions were quantified using a microfluidic chip capillary electrophoresis system (MICEP-30, Ardent BioMed, Guangzhou, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (19). Briefly, this technique separates HDL particles based on size and electrical charge, allowing quantification of HDL-2b and HDL-3 subfractions as percentages (%) of total HDL particles, from which corresponding concentrations were calculated. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were both <5%. Conventional lipid parameters, including total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, and HDL-C, were measured using standard enzymatic methods in the central laboratory of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital.

2.3 Clinical data and definitions

Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory data, and coronary angiographic findings were extracted from the hospital’s electronic health record system. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or current use of antihypertensive drugs. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, or current use of antidiabetic therapy. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Statin use was recorded if the patient was prescribed statin therapy at discharge. The severity of coronary artery stenosis was assessed using the Gensini score. Coronary angiograms were independently evaluated by two cardiologists who were blinded to patient outcomes, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

2.4 Outcomes and follow-up

The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACCEs, defined as a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), stroke, and major bleeding events (intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal tract bleeding).

Follow-up information was obtained through outpatient visits, hospital records, and structured telephone interviews conducted every 6–12 months. The follow-up period was calculated from the date of the index AMI admission to the date of the first MACCE event or the last available contact.

2.5 Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as medians (Q1, Q3), and categorical variables were presented as counts (percentages). Differences among HDL subfraction tertile groups were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the discriminative ability of HDL-C, HDL-2b, and HDL-3 for predicting MACCEs. The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using DeLong’s non-parametric method, and AUCs were compared across HDL subfractions. Event-free survival was evaluated with Kaplan–Meier curves, and between-group differences were assessed with the log-rank test.

To examine the association between HDL subfractions and MACCEs, Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated. HDL subfractions were analyzed both as tertiles and as continuous variables (per 0.1 mmol/L increment). Three hierarchical models were fitted, and the proportional hazards assumption was tested using Schoenfeld residuals and was satisfied for all models:

• Model 1: unadjusted;

• Model 2: adjusted for age and sex;

• Model 3: further adjusted for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, CKD, and statin use. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) models with four knots were applied to evaluate potential non-linear relationships between HDL subfractions and MACCEs risk. To explore potential mechanisms, mediation analysis was performed to assess whether the Gensini score mediated the association between HDL-3 and MACCEs, using a bias-corrected bootstrap approach with 1,000 replications. Subgroup analyses were further conducted according to age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and CKD status, and multiplicative interaction terms were included to test for effect modification.

All analyses were performed using R software (version 4.4.3), with two-tailed p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Baseline characteristics

Among the 1,240 patients included in this study, the median age was 64 years, and 25.1% were women (Table 1). Patients were stratified into three groups according to HDL-3 tertiles for comparison. Individuals in the lowest HDL-3 tertile were significantly older (p = 0.001) and had a higher prevalence of CKD (p < 0.001). In contrast, the distributions of sex, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were comparable across HDL-3 tertiles. In addition, patients with lower HDL-3 levels had substantially reduced eGFR values (p < 0.001) and elevated C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.001), suggesting more pronounced renal dysfunction and systemic inflammation.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population stratified by HDL-3 tertiles.

3.2 Association between HDL subfractions and MACCEs risk

During a median follow-up of 52.4 months, 132 patients (10.7%) experienced MACCEs, including 42 deaths (3.4%) and 57 recurrent myocardial infarctions (4.6%) (Table 1).

The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant differences in MACCEs risk across tertiles of total HDL-C or HDL-2b (log-rank p > 0.05; Figures 2A,B). In contrast, the cumulative incidence of MACCEs decreased progressively across increasing HDL-3 tertiles (log-rank p < 0.001; Figure 2C).

Figure 2
Three Kaplan-Meier survival curves show survival probability over time in months. Panel A compares HDL levels with a log-rank P value of 0.293. Panel B compares HDL2b levels, P value 0.250. Panel C compares HDL3 levels, P value less than 0.001. Each panel includes three groups: T1 (red), T2 (green), and T3 (blue).

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for MACCEs by HDL subfraction tertiles. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing the cumulative incidence of MACCEs across tertiles of (A) total HDL-C, (B) HDL-2b, and (C) HDL-3. Differences among tertile groups were evaluated using the log-rank test.

ROC analysis showed that HDL-C (AUC = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.50–0.61) and HDL-2b (AUC = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.49–0.60) showed limited discriminative ability for predicting MACCEs (Figure 3). In comparison, HDL-3 demonstrated stronger predictive performance (AUC = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.57–0.67).

Figure 3
ROC curve graph depicting three colored lines: red for AUC (HDL) with 0.56, green for AUC (HDL2b) with 0.55, and blue for AUC (HDL3) with 0.62. The x-axis represents 1-specificity, and the y-axis represents sensitivity. A diagonal dashed line indicates a baseline with no discrimination capability.

Figure 3. ROC curves of HDL subfractions for predicting MACCEs. ROC curves illustrating the discriminative performance of total HDL-C, HDL-2b, and HDL-3 for predicting long-term MACCEs in patients with AMI.

In univariate Cox regression analysis, neither higher HDL-C nor HDL-2b levels were significantly associated with MACCEs risk compared with the lowest tertile (p > 0.05). In contrast, higher HDL-3 levels were associated with a lower MACCEs risk (Table 2). The HRs for MACCEs across HDL-3 tertiles were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.37–0.83) for the middle tertile and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.28–0.68) for the highest tertile. When analyzed as a continuous variable, each 0.1 mmol/L increment in HDL-3 was associated with a 28% reduction in MACCEs risk (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61–0.85).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Cox regression models for the association between HDL subfractions and MACCEs risk.

The inverse association between HDL-3 and MACCEs remained significant after adjusting for potential confounding factors (Table 2). In the fully adjusted model (Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, CKD, and statin use), patients in the highest HDL-3 tertile had a significantly lower risk of MACCEs compared with those in the lowest tertile (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.37–0.91). In the continuous model, each 0.1 mmol/L increase in HDL-3 was associated with a 17% reduction in the risk of MACCEs (HR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70–0.98).

3.3 Linear relationship between HDL-3 and MACCEs

RCS models adjusted for all covariates in Model 3 were used to evaluate the dose–response relationships between HDL subfractions and MACCEs risk. Neither HDL-C nor HDL-2b showed a significant association with MACCEs (p for overall > 0.05; Figures 4A, B). In contrast, HDL-3 demonstrated a linear inverse association with MACCEs (p for non-linearity = 0.356; Figure 4C).

Figure 4
Three graphs labeled A, B, and C show hazard ratios for HDL, HDL2b, and HDL3 levels respectively. Each graph has a red line indicating the trend with a shaded pink area representing the ninety-five percent confidence interval. The hazard ratio is plotted against different HDL levels. Graph A shows a hazard ratio decreasing below one and rising beyond certain HDL levels. Graph B and C display similar curvilinear trends. Significance levels for overall and nonlinear fits are noted above each graph.

Figure 4. RCS analyses for the association between HDL subfractions and MACCEs. RCS analyses illustrating the dose–response relationships between HDL subfractions and MACCEs risk. Models were adjusted for all covariates included in Model 3 (age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and statin use). Panels show (A) total HDL-C, (B) HDL-2b, and (C) HDL-3.

3.4 Mediation and subgroup analyses

Mediation analysis indicated that the Gensini score partially mediated the association between HDL-3 and MACCEs. Higher HDL-3 levels were inversely associated with the Gensini score, and this mediation pathway accounted for 11.8% of the overall protective effect of HDL-3 on MACCEs risk (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Mediational diagram showing the relationship among three variables: HDL3, Gensini, and MACCE. The direct effect between HDL3 and MACCE is negative zero point fifteen. The indirect effect through Gensini is negative zero point zero two, with eleven point seventy-eight percent proportion mediated. Statistical significance is indicated with P less than zero point zero zero one.

Figure 5. Mediation analysis of the association between HDL-3 and MACCEs. Mediation analysis evaluating the indirect effect of the Gensini score on the association between HDL-3 and MACCEs.

Subgroup analyses were performed to assess potential effect modification by demographic factors (age and sex) and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and CKD). The inverse association between HDL-3 and MACCEs was consistent across age, sex, hypertension, and CKD subgroups (all p for interaction > 0.05). Notably, the protective association was stronger among patients with diabetes mellitus (p for interaction = 0.001; Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Subgroup analyses of the association between HDL-3 and MACCEs risk.

Cox proportional hazards models examining the association between HDL-3 levels and MACCEs across subgroups defined by age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and CKD.

4 Discussion

In this single-center longitudinal cohort of patients with AMI, lower levels of the HDL-3 subfraction were significantly associated with a higher risk of long-term MACCEs, whereas total HDL-C and HDL-2b showed no independent predictive value. The inverse association between HDL-3 and MACCEs was linear and was partially mediated by the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, as quantified by the Gensini score. Notably, the protective effect of HDL-3 was most pronounced in patients with diabetes mellitus.

These results extend previous cross-sectional findings by demonstrating the long-term prognostic relevance of HDL subfractions in AMI patients. Earlier studies have reported that both HDL-2b and HDL-3 are inversely correlated with the severity of coronary stenosis, whereas total HDL-C did not display a consistent pattern (15, 20). Additional clinical studies across diverse cardiovascular populations also support the prognostic value of HDL-3. For instance, Kim et al. observed that HDL-3 exhibited a stronger protective association than HDL-2 in patients with carotid artery disease (21). Similarly, among individuals with heart failure, HDL-3, but not HDL-2 or total HDL-C, was significantly associated with reduced 3-month mortality (22). In two independent AMI cohorts (n = 2,465 and 2,414, respectively), HDL-3 was inversely associated with long-term adverse cardiac events (23). Furthermore, several studies focusing on HDL particle size have emphasized that smaller HDL particles provide better predictive power for mortality among patients with cardiovascular disease (24, 25).

HDL-3 represents the small, dense HDL particles enriched with functional proteins such as paraoxonase-1 and apolipoprotein A-I, which confer potent antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties (2628). Mechanistically, HDL-3, often described as small-sized HDL particles, can inhibit low-density lipoprotein oxidation, reduce endothelial adhesion molecule expression, and promote cholesterol efflux via ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) (2931). These biological effects limit macrophage foam-cell formation, suppress vascular inflammation within the arterial wall, and stabilize vulnerable plaques, thereby reducing the likelihood of recurrent ischemic events (32, 33). The mediation effect of the Gensini score observed in our study supports these classical anti-atherogenic pathways, suggesting that higher HDL-3 levels may help reduce atherosclerotic burden and promote coronary stability.

Nevertheless, mediation analysis showed that only 11.8% of the association between HDL-3 and clinical outcomes was explained by the Gensini score, implying that the majority of HDL-3’s protective effects are mediated through non-atherosclerotic pathways. Beyond plaque-related pathways, HDL-3 exerts systemic anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects beyond the arterial plaque. By scavenging reactive oxygen species, modulating toll-like receptor signaling, and suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation, HDL-3 dampens post-infarction sterile inflammation and ventricular remodeling independent of plaque burden (3437). In addition, HDL can improve endothelial function and microvascular perfusion via a sphingosine-1-phosphate-dependent pathway, further enhancing prognosis. More importantly, sphingosine-1-phosphate has been reported to be preferentially enriched in small, dense HDL3 particles (38, 39). Additionally, HDL-3 demonstrates antithrombotic and antiplatelet properties, reducing platelet aggregation and tissue-factor expression while enhancing endothelial prostacyclin and nitric oxide release, thereby decreasing the likelihood of thrombosis-driven recurrent events (40, 41). Collectively, these pleiotropic functions, including anti-inflammatory, vasodilatory, and antithrombotic effects, provide a biologically plausible explanation for the prognostic benefit of HDL-3 that is not mediated by coronary atherosclerosis.

A notable finding from this study is the significant interaction between HDL-3 and diabetes mellitus in determining the long-term prognosis of patients with AMI. Previous studies have reported associations between HDL subfractions and metabolic syndrome in individuals with premature coronary heart disease (42, 43). In diabetes, chronic hyperglycemia leads to oxidative modification and non-enzymatic glycation of HDL-associated proteins, including apolipoprotein A-I and paraoxonase-1, resulting in impaired cholesterol efflux capacity, reduced antioxidative activity, and a shift toward a pro-inflammatory HDL phenotype. Recent reviews further highlight that these compositional and enzymatic alterations contribute to the formation of dysfunctional HDL, characterized by reduced capacity to suppress vascular inflammation and preserve endothelial function (44). The stronger protective effect of HDL-3 observed in diabetic patients in our study may therefore reflect that, in a metabolically stressed environment, individuals with relatively preserved HDL-3 functionality derive the greatest cardiovascular benefit. In contrast, among non-diabetic individuals, who generally exhibit lower oxidative and inflammatory burden and experience fewer events, the functional gradient across HDL subfractions may be less pronounced, potentially explaining the absence of a significant association in this subgroup.

The findings of this study suggest that HDL subfractions, particularly the small, dense HDL-3 particles, may serve as practical and sensitive biomarkers for risk stratification in patients after AMI. Unlike total HDL-C, which represents a heterogeneous assemblage of HDL particles differing in size and function, HDL-3 directly reflects the most bioactive fraction with antioxidative and anti-inflammatory potential (33). Incorporating HDL-3 measurement into routine lipid profiling may help identify high-risk patients with elevated residual risk who could benefit from intensified lipid-lowering or anti-inflammatory therapies.

Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, as an observational single-center cohort, causal relationships cannot be established, and unmeasured confounding factors may still exist despite multivariable adjustment. Second, HDL-3 was measured only at baseline, and longitudinal changes in HDL subfractions during follow-up were not assessed. Third, information on non-statin lipid-lowering therapies was not included because their prescription rates were extremely low, although a residual effect cannot be fully excluded. Finally, external validation in multicenter, prospective cohorts is needed to confirm the generalizability of these findings.

5 Conclusion

In this retrospective cohort of patients with AMI, lower HDL-3 subfraction levels were independently and linearly inversely associated with a higher long-term risk of MACCEs, whereas total HDL-C and HDL-2b did not demonstrate significant prognostic value. Part of the association between HDL-3 and cardiovascular outcomes was mediated by the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, as reflected by the Gensini score. These findings suggest that HDL-3 represents a functionally relevant component of HDL metabolism and may more accurately reflect residual cardiovascular risk than conventional lipid parameters.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (Approval No. 23578-4-01). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

YG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft. XD: Data curation, Writing – original draft. YX: Data curation, Writing – original draft. BW: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. QL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. TL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. CL: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. YW: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. PZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Fund (Grant Nos. 12023C1002 and 12023Z1005) and the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [Grant No. 7244450].

Conflict of interest

XD was employed Ardent BioMed LLC (ABIOM).

The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Naghavi, M, Ong, KL, Aali, A, Ababneh, HS, Abate, YH, Abbafati, C, et al. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. (2024) 403:2100–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wang, Y, Li, Q, Bi, L, Wang, B, Lv, T, and Zhang, P. Global trends in the burden of ischemic heart disease based on the global burden of disease study 2021: the role of metabolic risk factors. BMC Public Health. (2025) 25:310. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21588-9,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zhang, H, Zhou, X-D, Shapiro, MD, Lip, GYH, Tilg, H, Valenti, L, et al. Global burden of metabolic diseases, 1990–2021. Metabolism. (2024) 160:155999. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2024.155999,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Almeida, SO, and Budoff, M. Effect of statins on atherosclerotic plaque. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2019) 29:451–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.01.001,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kytö, V, Rautava, P, and Tornio, A. Initial statin dose after myocardial infarction and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. (2023) 9:156–64. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac064,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hoogeveen, RC, and Ballantyne, CM. Residual cardiovascular risk at low LDL: remnants, lipoprotein(a), and inflammation. Clin Chem. (2021) 67:143–53. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa252,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Superko, HR, and King, S. Lipid management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a new strategy is required. Circulation. (2008) 117:560–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.667428,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Madsen, CM, Varbo, A, and Nordestgaard, BG. Extreme high high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is paradoxically associated with high mortality in men and women: two prospective cohort studies. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38:2478–86. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx163,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Salahuddin, T, Kittelson, J, Tardif, J-C, Shah, PK, Olsson, AG, Nicholls, SJ, et al. Association of high-density lipoprotein particle concentration with cardiovascular risk following acute coronary syndrome: a case-cohort analysis of the dal-outcomes trial. Am Heart J. (2020) 221:60–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.003,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lappegård, KT, Kjellmo, CA, and Hovland, A. High-density lipoprotein subfractions: much ado about nothing or clinically important? Biomedicine. (2021) 9:836. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9070836,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chen, Q, Abudukeremu, A, Li, K, Zheng, M, Li, H, Huang, T, et al. High-density lipoprotein subclasses and their role in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: a narrative review. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:7856. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147856,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Eisenberg, S. High density lipoprotein metabolism. J Lipid Res. (1984) 25:1017–58. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)37713-0,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Blanche, PJ, Gong, EL, Forte, TM, and Nichols, AV. Characterization of human high-density lipoproteins by gradient gel electrophoresis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Lipids Lipid Metab. (1981) 665:408–19. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(81)90253-8,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Duparc, T, Ruidavets, J-B, Genoux, A, Ingueneau, C, Najib, S, Ferrières, J, et al. Serum level of HDL particles are independently associated with long-term prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease: the GENES study. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:8138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65100-2,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Geng, Y, Wang, B, Liu, L, Lv, C, Qian, H, Lv, T, et al. Association between the proportion of HDL-cholesterol subclasses and the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Lipidol. (2024) 18:e710–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.003,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. de la Cruz-Ares, S, Leon-Acuña, A, Yubero-Serrano, EM, Torres-Peña, JD, Arenas-de Larriva, AP, Cardelo, MP, et al. High density lipoprotein subfractions and extent of coronary atherosclerotic lesions: from the cordioprev study. Clin Chim Acta. (2022) 533:89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.06.002,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Puelacher, C, Gualandro, DM, Glarner, N, Lurati Buse, G, Lampart, A, Bolliger, D, et al. Long-term outcomes of perioperative myocardial infarction/injury after non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. (2023) 44:1690–701. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac798,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Nestelberger, T, Boeddinghaus, J, Wussler, D, Twerenbold, R, Badertscher, P, Wildi, K, et al. Predicting major adverse events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 74:842–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.025,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhezhi, D, Zhihui, Z, Shifeng, Z, Minping, L, Xue, X, Weiwei, Q, et al. HDL subfractions determined by microfluidic chip electrophoresis predict the vulnerability of intracranial plaque: A HRMRI study. Clin Chim Acta. (2024) 553:117713. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117713,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wang, B, Li, D, Geng, Y, Jin, F, Wang, Y, Lv, C, et al. Interpretable predictive value of including HDL-2b and HDL-3 in an explainable boosting machine model for multiclass classification of coronary artery stenosis severity in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J Digit Health. (2025) 6:228–39. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae100,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Kim, DS, Burt, AA, Rosenthal, EA, Ranchalis, JE, Eintracht, JF, Hatsukami, TS, et al. HDL-3 is a superior predictor of carotid artery disease in a case-control cohort of 1725 participants. J Am Heart Assoc. (2014) 3:e000902. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.000902,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Degoricija, V, Potočnjak, I, Gastrager, M, Pregartner, G, Berghold, A, Scharnagl, H, et al. HDL subclasses and mortality in acute heart failure patients. Clin Chim Acta. (2019) 490:81–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.12.020,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Martin, SS, Khokhar, AA, May, HT, Kulkarni, KR, Blaha, MJ, Joshi, PH, et al. HDL cholesterol subclasses, myocardial infarction, and mortality in secondary prevention: the lipoprotein investigators collaborative. Eur Heart J. (2015) 36:22–30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu264,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. McGarrah, RW, Craig, DM, Haynes, C, Dowdy, ZE, Shah, SH, and Kraus, WE. High-density lipoprotein subclass measurements improve mortality risk prediction, discrimination and reclassification in a cardiac catheterization cohort. Atherosclerosis. (2016) 246:229–35. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.012,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Silbernagel, G, Pagel, P, Pfahlert, V, Genser, B, Scharnagl, H, Kleber, ME, et al. High-density lipoprotein subclasses, coronary artery disease, and cardiovascular mortality. Clin Chem. (2017) 63:1886–96. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.275636,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Generoso, G, Bensenor, IM, Santos, RD, Santos, IS, Goulart, AC, Jones, SR, et al. Association between high-density lipoprotein subfractions and low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome components: the ELSA-Brasil study. J Clin Lipidol. (2018) 12:1290–1297.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2018.05.003,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Chaudhary, R, Kinderytė, M, Chaudhary, R, Sukhi, A, Bliden, K, Tantry, U, et al. HDL3-C is a marker of coronary artery disease severity and inflammation in patients on statin therapy. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. (2019) 20:1001–6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.12.019,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Pammer, A, Klobučar, I, Stadler, JT, Meissl, S, Habisch, H, Madl, T, et al. Impaired HDL antioxidant and anti-inflammatory functions are linked to increased mortality in acute heart failure patients. Redox Biol. (2024) 76:103341. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103341,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ashby, DT, Rye, KA, Clay, MA, Vadas, MA, Gamble, JR, and Barter, PJ. Factors influencing the ability of HDL to inhibit expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (1998) 18:1450–5. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.18.9.1450,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Groenen, AG, Halmos, B, Tall, AR, and Westerterp, M. Cholesterol efflux pathways, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. (2021) 56:426–39. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2021.1925217,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ochoa-Guzmán, A, Guillén-Quintero, D, Muñoz-Hernández, L, García, A, Díaz-Díaz, E, Pérez-Méndez, O, et al. The influence of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and HDL subfractions on insulin secretion and cholesterol efflux in pancreatic derived β-cells. J Endocrinol Invest. (2021) 44:1897–904. doi: 10.1007/s40618-021-01504-9,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Nguyen, SD, Öörni, K, Lee-Rueckert, M, Pihlajamaa, T, Metso, J, Jauhiainen, M, et al. Spontaneous remodeling of HDL particles at acidic pH enhances their capacity to induce cholesterol efflux from human macrophage foam cells. J Lipid Res. (2012) 53:2115–25. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M028118,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Du, X-M, Kim, M-J, Hou, L, Le Goff, W, Chapman, MJ, Van Eck, M, et al. HDL particle size is a critical determinant of ABCA1-mediated macrophage cellular cholesterol export. Circ Res. (2015) 116:1133–42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305485,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Nurmi, K, Niemi, K, Kareinen, I, Silventoinen, K, Lorey, MB, Chen, Y, et al. Native and oxidised lipoproteins negatively regulate the serum amyloid A-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human macrophages. Clin Transl Immunol. (2021) 10:e1323. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1323,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. McEneny, J, Henry, S-L, Woodside, J, Moir, S, Rudd, A, Vaughan, N, et al. Lycopene-rich diets modulate HDL functionality and associated inflammatory markers without affecting lipoprotein size and distribution in moderately overweight, disease-free, middle-aged adults: A randomized controlled trial. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:954593. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.954593,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Wang, Y, Bi, L, Li, Q, Wang, Q, Lv, T, and Zhang, P. Remnant cholesterol inflammatory index and its association with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and elderly populations: evidence from US and Chinese national population surveys. Lipids Health Dis. (2025) 24:155. doi: 10.1186/s12944-025-02580-z,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Rysz, J, Gluba-Brzózka, A, Rysz-Górzyńska, M, and Franczyk, B. The role and function of HDL in patients with chronic kidney disease and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:601. doi: 10.3390/ijms21020601,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Li, H-F, Lin, H, Liu, H-T, Lin, T-J, and Tseng, T-L. Activating transcription factor-3 orchestrates the modulation of vascular anti-contractile activity and relaxation by governing the secretion of HDL-bound sphingosine-1-phosphate in perivascular adipose tissue. Br J Pharmacol. (2025) 182:1763–82. doi: 10.1111/bph.17433,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Therond, P, and Chapman, MJ. Sphingosine-1-phosphate: metabolism, transport, atheroprotection and effect of statin treatment. Curr Opin Lipidol. (2022) 33:199–207. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000825,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Garcia, C, Montée, N, Faccini, J, Series, J, Meilhac, O, Cantero, A-V, et al. Acute coronary syndrome remodels the antiplatelet aggregation properties of HDL particle subclasses. J Thromb Haemost. (2018) 16:933–45. doi: 10.1111/jth.14003,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Camont, L, Lhomme, M, Rached, F, Le Goff, W, Nègre-Salvayre, A, Salvayre, R, et al. Small, dense high-density lipoprotein-3 particles are enriched in negatively charged phospholipids: relevance to cellular cholesterol efflux, antioxidative, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic functionalities. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2013) 33:2715–23. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301468,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Paavola, T, Kuusisto, S, Jauhiainen, M, Kakko, S, Kangas-Kontio, T, Metso, J, et al. Impaired HDL2-mediated cholesterol efflux is associated with metabolic syndrome in families with early onset coronary heart disease and low HDL-cholesterol level. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0171993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171993,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lucero, D, Sviridov, D, Freeman, L, López, GI, Fassio, E, Remaley, AT, et al. Increased cholesterol efflux capacity in metabolic syndrome: relation with qualitative alterations in HDL and LCAT. Atherosclerosis. (2015) 242:236–42. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.07.019,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Femlak, M, Gluba-Brzózka, A, Ciałkowska-Rysz, A, and Rysz, J. The role and function of HDL in patients with diabetes mellitus and the related cardiovascular risk. Lipids Health Dis. (2017) 16:207. doi: 10.1186/s12944-017-0594-3,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: HDL subfractions, HDL-3, acute myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, prognosis

Citation: Geng Y, Deng X, Xue Y, Wang B, Liu Q, Lv T, Lv C, Wang Y and Zhang P (2026) Association between HDL-cholesterol subfractions and the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a single-center retrospective observational study. Front. Nutr. 12:1728525. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1728525

Received: 20 October 2025; Revised: 16 November 2025; Accepted: 16 December 2025;
Published: 08 January 2026.

Edited by:

Ioannis Zabetakis, University of Limerick, Ireland

Reviewed by:

Yaman Walid Kassab, National University of Science and Technology, Oman
Yan Li, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, China

Copyright © 2026 Geng, Deng, Xue, Wang, Liu, Lv, Lv, Wang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yifei Wang, eWlmZWktd2FuZzEzQHRzaW5naHVhLm9yZy5jbg==; Ping Zhang, emhwZG9jQDEyNi5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

ORCID: Yifei Wang, orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-0974
Ping Zhang, orcid.org/0000-0002-5843-1108

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.